Cross-Codes Electricity Forum · 2018. 4. 23. · final consl. late Sep/early Oct P262: 31/12/10 or...

Cross-Codes Electricity Forum17 September 2010

Webinar help

» To submit questions:

• Type into the chat box (not the „raise hand‟ icon)

• We‟ll take questions at the end of each presentation

» To see the chat box when in full-screen slide mode:

• Click on the toolbar speech bubble icon

» If you have any problems:

• Send us a message through the chat function, or ring our switchboard on 020 7380 4100

• If you can‟t hear us, check you‟ve dialed the right teleconference number from our email

• Kathryn Coffin (020 7380 4030 [email protected]) • Cross-Codes Electricity Forum 17 September 2010

Welcome and introductionToday‟s aims and running order

mailto:[email protected]

Health & safety

» Evacuation muster point in Triton Square

• Opposite Pret/Starbucks, next to the wavy grass

Aims of this forum

» A „one-stop shop‟ for information on BSC, CUSC and related Grid Code changes, including:

• „Joined up‟ info on cross-code changes

» A way for you to find out:

• Which changes impact you

• How you can get involved (and why your views matter)

» An opportunity to informally talk to us and other Parties about change

Kathryn Coffin,Change Analyst, Change Management

Who we are

Alex Thomason,Electricity Codes

Senior Commercial Analyst

Tom DerryElectricity Codes

Commercial Analyst

Andrew Wright,Change Analyst, Change Management

Agenda

» Today‟s running order:

• Main presentations 10:10-11:50

• Optional session 11:50-13:00

» Optional session:

• Anything you‟d like to know or discuss?

• We‟re available to:

─ Give an overview of Governance Review changes

─ Walk through individual changes in detail

─ Talk to you about change

Questions?

Change-spotter’s guidePurpose, status and impacts of current changes

• Kathryn Coffin (020 7380 4030 [email protected])

• Alex Thomason (01926 656379 [email protected])

• Tom Derry (01926 654208 [email protected])

• Cross-Codes Electricity Forum 17 September 2010




The common CUSC/BSC change process

„Pre-change‟ process

Change raised

Panel decision on progression

Industry consultation

Panel final report to Ofgem

Ofgem decision to approve or

reject

Appeal to Competition Commission

Workgroup assessment

Urgent process

(if Ofgem decision differs from Panel recommendation and no effect on security of supply)

4 areas of cross-code change

1. Grid Code compliance:

• Impacts Grid Code, CUSC and Distribution Code

2. Interconnector Frequency Response provision:

• Impacts CUSC and BSC

3. Transmission charging for 132kV generation:

• BSC change to facilitate Charging Methodology work

4. Governance Review:

• Primary impacts on CUSC, BSC and UNC

A/10: Generator Compliance

Consultation

Coming soon

Subject area: • Generator Grid Code compliance process

Impacts:• Medium: Generators, manufacturers,

Distributors• CUSC and Distribution Code (not DCUSA)

Consultation dates:• Original consultation closed 18 June 2010• Further consultation in late September

Implementation:• No retrospective application

http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/gridcode/consultationpapers/

Grid Code

CAP181: Consequential changes related to Grid Code Amendment A/10 (Compliance)

Subject area: • Limitation of liability (National Grid & Licence

Exempt Embedded Medium Power Stations)

Impacts:• Medium: Distributors, National Grid,

LEEMPs

Consultation dates:• Workgroup consultation closed July 2010• In parallel with Grid Code/Distribution Code• Awaiting review of Grid Code A/10

Implementation:• Consequential to Grid Code implementation

http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/systemcode/amendments/currentamendmentproposals/


On hold pending Grid Code work

CUSC

Distribution Code: Consequential changes related to Grid Code Amendment A/10 (Compliance)

Subject area: • National Grid, Distributors and LEEMPs

obligations in LEEMPs compliance process

Impacts:• Medium: Distributors, National Grid,

LEEMPS

Consultation dates:• Closed July 2010• In parallel with Grid Code/CUSC• Awaiting review of Grid Code A/10

Implementation:• Consequential to Grid Code implementation

http://www.energynetworks.info/consultations/


On hold pending Grid Code work

DC

P259: Provision of Applicable Balancing Services Volumes for Interconnectors

Subject area: • Interconnectors

Impacts:• High: National Grid, Interconnector Error

Administrators• Medium: BSC Agents

Recommendation:• Approve change (no alternative solution

developed)

Implementation:• 31 March 2011 if decision by 21 Oct 2010• Next available Release if after 21 Oct 2010

http://www.elexon.co.uk/changeimplementation/modificationprocess/modificationdocumentation/modproposalview.aspx?propid=287

BSC

With Ofgem for decision

CAP182: Provision of Frequency

Response from DC converters

Subject area: • Balancing Services (Frequency Response)

Impacts:• Medium: Interconnector Asset Owners,

National Grid

Consultation dates:• Workgroup consultation closed• Workgroup report November 2010

Implementation:• 10WDs after decision

CUSC



Recommendation:Tbc

P260: Extension to data provided to the Transmission Company in the TUoS report

Subject area: • Data provision

Impacts:• Low: ELEXON, BSC Agents and National

Grid only

Consultation dates:• Out now – closes 29 September 2010• Views sought on benefits of data to Parties

Implementation:• 31 Mar 2011, if decision by 19 Nov 2010• Next available Release if after 19 Nov 2010

http://www.elexon.co.uk/changei

mplementation/modificationproce

ss/modificationdocumentation/m

odproposalview.aspx?propid=28

8

BSC

Recommendation:Reject original and alternative solutions

Final consultation

Governance Review changes

» 6 areas covered at previous forums:

• Ofgem Significant Code Reviews (SCRs) for important changes (which may affect more than one code)

• Panel self-governance for minor „non-material‟ changes

• „Send back‟ process if Panel‟s report lacks information for Ofgem to make a decision

• Charging Methodologies under normal CUSC/DCUSA code change processes (Parties can raise changes)

• Code Administrators to adhere to new Code of Practice

• Workgroups and Panels to assess environmental impacts of changes (all codes)

Governance Review changes

» 1 new area of change:

• SCR code changes should have 2/3rds majority support of Panel Members to be recommended for approval

• Uncertain if inconsistent with Energy Act

» The 7 areas impact all users of the change process - not just Proposers and Panels

» Ofgem‟s review aims:

» Transparency, flexibility, accessibility, accountability, effectiveness and alignment of code change processes

Area CUSC BSC StatusRecommen

-dationConsultation

datesImplement-

ation

SignificantCode Reviews

CAP183

P262Workgroupassessment

Approve P262

(2 potential solution

additions)

CAPs 183-185: tbc

P262 workgroup

consl. out now (closes 22 Sep)

CAPs 183-185 final consl. late Sep/early Oct

P262: 31/12/10 or

15WDs

CAPs 183-185: 10WDs

Self-governance

CAP184

Code Administrator

Code of Practice

CAP185

„Send-back‟ process

CAP186

P263

P263 in final consultation

CAPs 186/187 with Ofgem for

decision

Approve all changes

P263 final consl. out now (closes 22 Sep)

CAPs 186/187 consl. closed

P263: 31/12/10 or

15WDs

CAPs186/187: 10WDs

Environmental assessment

CAP187

Charging methodology governance

CAP188 N/AWorkgroup assessment

TbcFinal consl. late Sep/early Oct

10WDs withtransition

arrangements

2/3rds Panelmajority for SCR changes

CAP190 P264

Workgroup assessment on hold awaiting legal advice

Tbc Tbc Tbc

Other changes – Grid Code

» Ordered by their stage in the change process:

• Changes in workgroup stage

• Changes in final report stage

• Changes with Ofgem

C/10: Electronic Dispatch and Logging (EDL)


Recommendation:Tbc

Subject area: • Generator connection conditions and

Balancing Code

Impacts:• Low: Generators, National Grid

Workgroup meeting dates:• First workgroup meeting 20 August 2010


Grid Code

B/10: Record of Inter-System Security Precautions (RISSP)

Preparing final report to Ofgem

Support from across industry

Subject area: • Administrative IS change to the RISSP

electronic form• Form used for the co-ordination,

establishment & maintenance of access to other Users‟ transmission systems

Impacts:• Low: Transmission Owners, Distributors,

National Grid

Consultation dates:• Grid Code consultation closed

Implementation:• Tbc as part of Ofgem‟s decision process


Grid Code

D/10: Frequency and Voltage Operating Range (FaVOR)

Preparing final report to Ofgem

Support from across industry

Subject area: • A generator‟s mandatory operating ranges

for both frequency and voltage

Impacts:• Low: National Grid, generators,

manufacturers

Consultation dates:• Closed 2 September 2010



Grid Code

H/09: Submission of detailed planning data

Subject area: • Generator connection conditions

Impacts:• Low: Generators, manufacturers,

National Grid

Consultation dates:• Grid Code consultation closed



Grid Code


Other changes - CUSC


• Changes in workgroup stage


CAP179: Prevention of ‘timing out’ of Authority decisions on Amendment Proposals

Subject area: • Governance

Impacts:• Medium: Panel, Ofgem, workgroups and

all participants affected by Amendment Proposal Implementation Dates

Consultation dates:• Original workgroup consultation closed• Further consultation on alternative solution• Report to October 2010 Panel

Implementation:• 10WDs after decision


CUSC


Further consultation coming soon

CAP189: Standard Gas Insulated

Switchgear ownership boundaries

Subject area: • Gas Insulated Switchgear ownership

boundaries between users

Impacts:• High: Transmission Owners, generators,

Distributors, directly-connected customers

Workgroup meeting dates:• First workgroup meeting September 2010

Implementation:• To be established by workgroup

CUSC



Recommendation:Tbc

CUSC changes with Ofgem

» Transmission access changes:

• CAP148 and CAPs 161 to 168

• On hold following DECC‟s decision to implement “Connect and Manage”

» CAP170 „Category 5 system to generator operational Intertripping scheme‟:

• Final report to Ofgem March 2009

• Ofgem impact assessments and consultations

• Ofgem decision anticipated late 2010

CUSC



Other changes - BSC


• Changes with workgroups

• Changes out for final consultation


» Currently no issues in „pre-change‟ process

P253: Improving the accuracy of the credit calculation for SVA participants

Subject area: • Calculation of Parties‟ Credit Cover• Addresses 3 issues using actual data

Impacts:• High: Suppliers, Half Hourly Data

Aggregators & Data Collectors, BSC Agents

Consultation dates:• Out now – closes 30 September 2010• Party Agent costs sought

Implementation:• 03 Nov 2011, if decision by 19 Nov 2010• 23 Feb 2012, if decision by 23 Feb 2011

http://www.elexon.co.uk/changeimplementation/findachange/modproposal_details.aspx?propid=281

BSC

Recommendation:Approve change

Final consultation

P265: Improving accuracy of credit calculation for SVA participants (P253 alternative solution)

Subject area: • Calculation of Parties‟ Credit Cover• Addresses 2 issues using estimated data

Impacts:• High: BSC Agents• No participant impact

Consultation dates:• Out now – closes 30 September 2010• Panel overall preference for P253

Implementation:• 03 Nov 2011, if decision by 19 Nov 2010• 23 Feb 2012, if decision by 23 Feb 2011

http://www.elexon.co.uk/changeimplementation/findachange/modproposal_details.aspx?propid=281

BSC

Recommendation:Approve change

Final consultation

P256: Improving efficiency & clarity of the Trading Disputes process

Subject area: • Trading Disputes

Impacts:• High: Trading Disputes Committee, and

Parties who want to raise a Trading Query/Dispute


developed)

Implementation:• 04 Nov 2010, if decision by 24 Sep 2010• Next available Release if after 24 Sep 2010


BSC


P257: Removal of the concept of Trading Queries


Impacts:• High: Trading Disputes Committee• Low: Parties who want to raise a Trading

Query/Dispute


developed)

Implementation:• 04 Nov 2010, if decision by 24 Sep 2010• Next available Release if after 24 Sep 2010


BSC


P258: Party Agent inclusion in the Trading Disputes process


Impacts:• High: Trading Disputes Committee, and

Parties and Party Agents

Recommendation:• Reject change (no alternative solution

developed)

Implementation:• 03 Nov 2011, if decision by 01 Nov 2010• Next available Release if after 01 Nov 2010


BSC


How can I get further info?

» Websites:

• http://www.elexon.co.uk/changeimplementation/findachange/modificationproposals.aspx

» Sign up to email distribution lists by:

• Emailing [email protected]

• Going to:

− http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/systemcode/alerts/

− http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/gridcode/alerts/

http://www.elexon.co.uk/changeimplementation/findachange/modificationproposals.aspx

http://www.elexon.co.uk/changeimplementation/findachange/modificationproposals.aspx


http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/systemcode/alerts/


http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/gridcode/alerts/


BSC Panel election update

» Results published 16 August 2010

» New Panel effective 1 October 2010

» The elected Industry Panel Members are:

• Nigel Cornwall (Cornwall Energy)

• Barbara Vest (AEP)

• Stuart Cotton (Drax Power)

• Peter Bolitho (E.ON)

• Andrew Colley (SSE)

» http://www.elexon.co.uk/bscpanelandcommittees/panelelection.aspx

http://www.elexon.co.uk/bscpanelandcommittees/panelelection.aspx

Questions?

• Kathryn Coffin (020 7380 4030 [email protected])• Cross-Codes Electricity Forum 17 September 2010

Cracking the consultationsWhat we want to know and why


» Working groups, Panels and Ofgem need to know:

• The benefits and drawbacks of a change (and their materiality)

• Who a change affects and how (impacts, costs, lead times)

» This information is used to:

• Decide whether to make a change

• Set Implementation Dates

Why we consult

Change process

How do I receive consultations?

» Subscribe to consultation emails by:

• Emailing [email protected]

• Signing up at:

─ http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/systemcode/alerts/

─ http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/Electricity/Codes/gridcode/alerts/






Common myths dispelled (1 of 5)

“I‟m a small Party.

There‟s no point responding to consultations because my

views won‟t count.

It‟s a numbers game –whatever the Big 6 say

goes.”

Panel considers strength of argument,

not numbers

Small Party responses stand out – workgroups, Panel and Ofgem

take notice


“It‟s not worth spending time and effort now to work out my impacts and costs.

I‟ll do this later if the change is approved.”

A risky strategy! If you can‟t make the Implementation Date you could be left non-compliant with your

obligations

A missed opportunity! Providing this information earlier could

influence whether the change is approved, its solution and its Implementation Date


“If I provide costs my competitors will see them, and I‟ll be at a commercial

disadvantage”

It‟s helpful to workgroups and the Panel to see all costs

We‟d rather get confidential costs than no costs at all!

But you can provide confidential info which

only Ofgem sees


“I don‟t have time to fill in a response form, answer all the questions or refer to

Applicable Objective X – it‟s too bureaucratic”

We use forms to highlight specific areas where the workgroup/Panel wants

your views

If you‟re pushed for time, or unsure which Objective to use, just give us your general views (an email will do)

We try to ask „Yes/No‟ questions so we can be

sure of your views

We‟d rather get your unpolished thoughts

than no views!


“I don‟t have time to reply to both the workgroup and

final consultations.

It‟s better to just respond to the final one so the Panel and Ofgem see my views”

The Panel and Ofgem see views from each

consultation – those from earlier on aren‟t “lost”

You therefore have more opportunity to influence a change by responding to

the workgroup‟s consultation

It‟s only the workgroup that can alter the solution

How can we make it easier for you to respond?

» ELEXON‟s thinking about how we can engage better with you on BSC change

» Some ideas include:

• A regular, proactive „Change Corner‟ in Newscast

• Website „Modcasts‟ explaining each change

• Teleconferences to support each consultation

» Email suggestions to [email protected]

• We‟ll consider anything within the limits of practicality!


Questions?

Briefing on the Smart Metering Implementation

ProgrammeCross Codes Electricity Forum

Chris RowellSeptember 2010

The Prospectus

The Prospectus

Revised IAs – Domestic & SMEs Remote Enablement / Disablement

Consumer Research Report

28 Sep 28 Oct

Statement of Design Requirements

Implementation Strategy

Rollout Strategy

Communications Business Model

Disablement/enablement gas meters

Regulatory and Commercial Framework

Non – Domestic Sector

In-home DisplayConsumer Protection

Data Privacy and Security

Suppliers Network

Operators

Other

Authorised

Parties

WAN

Module

Gas

Elec

IHD

HAN

Other

Devices

Supplier

WAN

Data

Function

Gateway

DataCommsCo (DCC)

(27-127 terabytes pa)

Proposed Responsibilities

Secure Communications & Access Control

Translation Services Scheduled Data Retrieval

Smart Grid (initial reqs) Meter Registration

Potential Scope of the DCC

Smart Grid (evolved reqs) Change of Supplier Data

Extra-Industry Services

Consumer Value-Added Services

Data Processing

Data Aggregation & Storage

DCC S

erv

ice P

rovi

ders

Regulatory Framework

DCC Licence

Smart Energy Code

DCC

Comms

Data

Code Admin.

Other Business Customers

Electricity Sector

Designated Parties

Gas Sector Designated

Parties

Registration Services

Funds

Transfer

BSC Services

Meter

Operations

Settlement

Meter Data

Retrieval

Data

Processing

Data

Aggregation

Volume

Allocation

Registration

Supplier Services

Current Electricity Processes & Potential DCC Scope

Short Term SMIP Plan

» The SMIP Consultations

•28 September – Priority questions

•28 October – All other questions

» Information Requests

•28 September - Rollout

» Groups

•Smart Metering Design Group (SMDG)

•Data and Communications Group (DCG)

•Implementation Co-ordination Group (ICG)

•Consumer Advisory Group (CAG)

•PSAG, SMUG, Disability Avisory Forum

S O N

Aut

D J F

Win

M A M

Spr

J J A

Sum

Medium Term SMIP Plan

(to DCC Go Live)

S O N

Aut

D J F

Win

M A M

Spr

J J A

Sum

S O N

Aut

D J F

Win

M A M

Spr

J J A

Sum

S O N

Aut

D J F

Win

Phase 3Implement Framework

DCC Use

Mandated

[60%] roll out

in 4 years

Functional

Reqs & Tech

Specs

confirmed

Go Active

Go-Live DCC

Go-Live Roll Out

Go Live Rollout

Commences

DCC Service

Providers Appointed

DCC SP Testing

DCC Go Active

DCC SP Appointment

DCC Framework

ImplementedDCC Licence

granted

DCC Licence Application

Phase 4Ongoing Compl

Govt Response to

Prospectus Consultation issued

Phase 1Policy Design

Supply

Licence

Framework

Implemented

Phase 2Establish Framework

Create Licence changes, new DCC Licence & Smart Energy Code

BSC Changes

20112010 2012 2013 2014

Any Questions

Paul Brodrick020 7380 [email protected]

Chris Rowell020 7380 [email protected]




Any questions?

End of main presentations

» We‟d really like your feedback!

• Please use the feedback forms; or

• Email [email protected]



Delving into detailOptional session

Topics

» Anything you‟d like to know or discuss?

» We‟re available to:

• Give an overview of the Governance Review changes

• Walk through individual changes in detail

• Talk to you about change

• Kathryn Coffin (020 7380 4030 [email protected])• Cross-Codes Electricity Forum 17 September 2010

Ofgem’s Governance ReviewOverview of the CUSC and BSC changes to deliver our new Licence obligations


The common CUSC/BSC change process


Change raised





reject



Urgent process


Impact of Governance Review

» Still one common change process

» But now has 3-tier governance:

• Initial Panel „filter‟ to determine which tier to use for a change

• A change can switch tiers during its progression if needed

• Each tier uses the same basic process with some steps added/removed

New 3-tier change governance

Change raised

Does it relate to an Ofgem

SCR?

Does it have a material

effect?

Special governance

(NEW)

Normal governance (as now)

Self-governance

(NEW)

Yes

Yes

No

No

Highest impact

Lowest impact

Indust

ry

New 3-tier change governance

Change raised

Does it relate to an Ofgem

SCR?

Does it have a material

effect?

Special governance

(NEW)

Normal governance (as now)

Self-governance

(NEW)

Yes

Yes

No

No

Highest impact

Lowest impact

Indust

ry

Code of Practice and environmental assessment obligations apply to all 3 tiers (though unlikely a self-governance change would impact emissions)

„Send back‟ process can be used for SCR and normal changes (and self-governance changes if appealed to Ofgem)

BSC/CUSC process for SCR changes (P262/CAP183)


Change raised





reject



Urgent process


Ofgem can commence an SCR for areas of significant, and/or cross-codes, impact


Ofgem SCR process

Change raised





reject



Urgent process


At end of SCR process, Ofgem can direct National Grid to raise a change

This change follows the normal process, except it can‟t be withdrawn or amalgamated without Ofgem‟s consent


Ofgem SCR process

Change raised





reject



Urgent process


Workgroup can still develop alternative(s)

Workgroup‟s and Panel‟s ability to make recommendation, and Parties‟ appeal rights, are unaffected

2/3rds majority needed to recommend approval? (P264/CAP190)


Ofgem SCR process

Change raised





reject



Urgent process


A change raised during an SCR can be subsumed into the SCR process unless exempted by Ofgem

Panel can recommend, and Ofgem can decide, that a change is subsumed into SCR

A subsumed change „freezes‟ until end of SCR

BSC/CUSC self-governance process (P262/CAP184)


Change raised




reject



Urgent process


Will ask Parties whether agree should be self-governance (Ofgem sees responses 5WDs before Panel meeting and can veto)


Panel can decide to progress a „non-material‟ change through self-governance (if yes, issues Self-Governance Statement to Ofgem)



Change raised


Panel decision to approve or

reject


Urgent process

Ofgem or Panel can decide to progress a „non-material‟ change as self-governance (if Panel, issues Self-Governance Statement to Ofgem)


Will ask Parties whether agree should be self-governance (Ofgem sees responses 5WDs before Panel meeting and can veto)

If agree self-governance, then Panel (not Ofgem) approves or rejects



Change raised



reject


Urgent process


reject


Can appeal to Ofgem within 15WDs



Change raised



reject



Urgent process



reject



Panel decision viewed as recommendation for purpose

of CC appeals process



Change raised



reject



Urgent process



reject



Panel decision viewed as recommendation for purpose

of CC appeals processCould have urgent self-governance change, but unlikely

BSC/CUSC ‘send back’ process (P263/CAP186)


Change raised





reject


Urgent process

If Ofgem is unable to make a decision because of missing, deficient or out-of-date information in the Panel‟s report, then it can send the change back to the Panel



Change raised





reject


Urgent process

The Panel decides what steps are needed to provide the information within Ofgem‟s timescales (will include consultation unless limited to obvious legal text typos)



Change raised





reject


Urgent process

The Panel submits an updated report to Ofgem, and can change its recommendation (and

Implementation Date) if appropriate



Change raised





reject


Urgent process

The Panel‟s revised report and (if appropriate) its revised recommendation become the basis for Ofgem‟s decision and any appeal to the CC





Change raised





reject


Urgent process

„Send back‟ process can apply to urgent changes

It can also be used more than once

Impacts

» Proposers:

• New fields in change form

• Change could be subsumed into SCR

• Change may no longer have Ofgem decision

» Panel/workgroups:

• Assess impact of greenhouse gas emissions

• Undertake additional work if change „sent back‟

Impacts

» Parties:

• Consultation process & appeal rights unchanged

• More alignment of code change processes

• Transparent principles for code administrators

Area CUSC BSC StatusRecommen

-dationConsultation

datesImplement-

ation

SignificantCode Reviews

CAP183

P262Workgroupassessment

Approve P262

(2 potential solution

additions)

CAPs 183-185: tbc

P262 workgroup

consl. out now (closes 22 Sep)

CAPs 183-185 final consl. late Sep/early Oct

P262: 31/12/10 or

15WDs

CAPs 183-185: 10WDs

Self-governance

CAP184

Code Administrator

Code of Practice

CAP185

„Send-back‟ process

CAP186

P263

P263 in final consultation

CAPs 186/187 with Ofgem for

decision

Approve all changes

P263 final consl. out now (closes 22 Sep)

CAPs 186/187 consl. closed

P263: 31/12/10 or

15WDs

CAPs186/187: 10WDs

Environmental assessment

CAP187

Charging methodology governance

CAP188 N/AWorkgroup assessment

TbcFinal consl. late Sep/early Oct

10WDs withtransition

arrangements

2/3rds Panelmajority for SCR changes

CAP190 P264

Workgroup assessment on hold awaiting legal advice

Tbc Tbc Tbc

Questions?

Cross-Codes Electricity Forum · 2018. 4. 23. · final consl. late Sep/early Oct P262: 31/12/10 or...

Documents

Transcript of Cross-Codes Electricity Forum · 2018. 4. 23. · final consl. late Sep/early Oct P262: 31/12/10 or...