CriticalWithouttheK

8/9/2019 CriticalWithouttheK

1/8

Critical Without the K Brendan Gallagher

Borrowed from policy

Alternative framework

Values lets you use K from the start

I. Why run ita. Surprise opponentsb. Forcing someone to defend something that is out of their comfort

zone

c. Less written responsesd. Wide ranging categorye. Many critical authors make good arguments in a debate context

because they take extremists or decisive positions

f. Critical philosophy answers a lot of traditional argumentsg. Arose as a response to modern philosophyh. Interesting

II.Why more than the Ka. Dont want to devote all speech to 7 minute kb. Other answers want to makec. Many judges who wouldnt be receptive are fine with kirikal

authors!!!!!!!

d. Sometimes that it doesnt make sense to run a 7 min k, can runtopical arguments

e. Aff- k structure doesnt workIII. Specific uses

a. Framework justificationsi. Make sure your criterion is tailored to the terminology by

the authors

ii. Make your evidence understandableiii. Authors that cite that author and summarize what the

author says in a more understandable manor (google

scholar)

iv. Framwork linked into a non-impact, moral reasonv. Can use critical evidence as impact based

1. BOW POW2. Bad impact

IV.EX1. Of a casea. Ought=mo


2/8

b. No such thing as independent desirabilityc. V:md. Trancend borderse. Universal ethic doesnt excludef. 1. Arbitraryg. 2. All connected by identity of humanityh. affirm common worthi. State has global human rightsj. 3. All have moral reasonk. Nationalism contraryl. Casues atrocitiesm.Outside inferiorn. Campbeell- Ritualized acts, service of its ideals, foreign policy,

inside outside, domestic foreign, externalized dangers,

axiollogically, moral heiarchy, discipline, secure identity on the

inside, nationalism displaces threat onto others, us them

dichotomy

o. Zizek- Threat put onto outside enemy, all powerful, legitimizethe current power structures, Stalin, Americans-Communism,

protective measure of defense, threat to human rights, So

nationalist ideology is false, threats

p. C: reducing focus on the nationV. EX 2.

a. Because the resolution asksb. Ought=moralityc. Ethical systemd. No idependent desirabilitye. No controlf. Gender is contraryg. C: less women oppressionh. 1. Understanding true effecti. can never understand aggregatej. Peksen- analyze the groups who take shockk. Economic powerl. 2. Using the lens of gender is crucial to understandingm.Peksen 2- particular attention to women


3/8


4/8

ii. Master unexpectediii. Articulated as universal interpretationiv. Visage in which disorder eliminatedv. Own remaindervi. All persisting order is , no utopian realizedvii. Constituteviii. Killing 1 to save more causes more violenceix. Doesnt make things worsex. Turn on the AC

c. AC claims an action is permissiblei. Scale or conceptii. Cant pass binaryiii. Matters of degreeiv. Better or worsev. Alexander

1. Judgements are binary2. Equally turns on acces of properties3. Morally forbidden or permissible4. Not morally perfect5. Flawed binary judgement6. Only morally better

XI.Entire case positionsa. Structure the case normallyb. Based on same philosophyc. Broad article for frameorkd. Then contention with topic specific

XII. Ex.a. Prevent fabrication of the felonb. Rather than a technical termc. Rather tha consider fact of murderd. Makes it possible for the government to suppresse. Diltz- Fabricating the deluinquent

i. Evil done tof. Foucalt- Not most intense form of illegalityg. An effect of penalityh. Supervise illegalities


5/8

i. Worst violation of democracyj. When people are fabricated they are no longer representedk. Invented as class of felonl. Society ceases to bem.Democratic successn. Must be linked to criminalo. Not linked to punishmentp. Know they are felon without knowingq. Crime is irrelevenr. Felon fabrication destroys punishments. 3. Destroys harmonious democracyt. Marks as an abnormal equal groupu. Anti-citizenv. Abstruction of the anti-identityw.My thesis- dis- fabricates the felonx. Removesy. Diltz 2- From physically societyz. Commoonly think of as the real worldaa. Social formsbb. Restrain selves entirelycc.Must be restricteddd. Inside political boundries of the nationee. Members of societyff. Disenfranchisementgg. Dsitinc categoryhh. B. Repeatedly conflates pastii. Diltz- remakes reminds that they are felonjj. Even after successfulkk. Requirementll. Sex offendermm. Repeadedly substitues for past effectnn. Denied political voiceoo. C. other forms of social exclusionpp. Foundation on other forms of disenfranchisementqq. How can we excpect a legal barriersrr.Representative society


6/8

ss. D. construct the felon as character that must be excludedtt.Diltz 5- outside of the dmosuu.

XIII. Moral permissibilitya. Right actions are permittedb. Proving resolution wrong negatesc. Implies this is a goald. An aim store could be out of milke. That of the one innocentf. Prevenent constant catastrophieg. Constant catastrophyh. Death of more legitimates constant state of emergencyi. Zizek existing power structures, threat externalized, divert

catastrophy

j. Create multruistick. Stop creatingl. Solves original problemm.Thereapuditcn. Lifton-Markunsent- kill hundreds in order to stop, Nazis

XIV. A2 argsa. Respond to theories that are olderb.


7/8

7/19/2010 10:58:00 AM


8/8

7/19/2010 10:58:00 AM

CriticalWithouttheK

Documents

Transcript of CriticalWithouttheK