Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study
description
Transcript of Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study
Critical Thinking Strategies Case Study
Angela Broughton, Claudette Johnson, Deborah Knutson, Eileen Padilla &
Danica Stout
Grand Canyon UniversityNUR: 649E Nursing Education Seminar II
Professor Jacquie Lisicki May 22, 2013
Learner Objectives
Upon completion of the program, participants will be able to:Describe the pathophysiology of CHF and how the diagnosis of CHF is determined.
Learner Objectives
Explain the difference between systolic and diastolic heart failure and the importance of assessing left ventricular function in suspected CHF patients
Learner Objectives
Describe the role of appropriate medications for CHF patients
Identify the components of appropriate discharge planning for CHF patients.
Evaluation Methods for Objectives
Observation
Participation
Evaluation Methods for Objectives
Pre/Post Test
Diagram fill-in
Evaluation Methods for Objectives
Interactive Case Scenarios
Simulation Lab
Observation
Advantages
Immediate feedback
Assess Attitude and Values
Immediate mediation
Participation
Advantages
Easy preparation
Inexpensive
Immediate Feedback
Evaluation Advantages & Disadvantages
Pre & Post Test
Advantages
Efficient assessment
Assess performance and knowledge
Diagram
Advantages
Good for visual students
Compact way to convey information
Interesting, convincing, forceful
Quick way to visualize information
Evaluation Advantages & Disadvantages
Evaluation Advantages & Disadvantages
Interactive Case Scenarios
Advantages
Participatory
Assess problem solving skills
Application of knowledge and skill
Simulation Lab
Advantages
Realistic, Interactive
Immediate Specific Feedback
Integrate theory and practice
Promotes independence
Acceptable Outcomes
Pre & Post Designed Testing- Cognitive Domain
Does not pre-determine how a student can learn, however can determine knowledge base
Analyzes conclusions drawn from the information in lecture form.
Assesses knowledge learned in the class (in post testing).
Acceptable Outcomes
Observation & Simulation- PsychomotorDomain Teach, learn and practice Safe environment Encourages close interaction in learning Ultimate level is at skill performance-
automatic without practice needed.
Acceptable Outcomes
Participation/Discussion- Audio Domain Active learning should be encouraged Discuss CHF in a report of the consequences
on diet and medication non-compliance Discuss in this same report that patient
contribution and taking action in diet and medications make a big difference in how they feel.
Assessment Model for Evaluation Design
CIPP Decision-Oriented Evaluation Framework
Context Input Process Product
CIPP Evaluation Model
Context Evaluation– Identify target population– Needs assessment (pre/post testing, observation)– Textbook knowledge applied to practice
CIPP Evaluation Model
Input Evaluation– Identifies & assesses:
System capabilitiesAlternative program strategiesProcedural designs for implementationStudent plan of care & interventions
CIPP Evaluation Model
Process Evaluation– Detects defects– Advantages vs. disadvantages– Evaluate performance, time
management, documentation– Simulation-Educators can
observe & intervene
CIPP Evaluation Model
Product Evaluation– Collect description/Analysis of Outcomes– Prioritization of goals and outcomes– Interpret results
Conclusion
Evaluation is accomplished through observation, participation, pre/post testing, diagrams, case studies, and simulation.
Effective evaluation strategies must consider the purpose, advantages and disadvantages of the evaluation tool.
CIPP Evaluation Framework-measures weaknesses/strengths, provides alternative options/information for decision makers
ReferencesAnderson, O. C. (2010). A Study of Teacher-Mediated Enhancement of Students’ Organization of Earth Science Knowledge Using
Web Diagrams as a Teaching Device. Journal of Science Teacher Education , 21, 683-701.Ari, A. (2009). The effect of quizzing on learning as a tool of assessment. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences , 8 (27), 202.Billings, D. M., & Halstead, J. A. (2012). Teaching in nursing: A guide for faculty (4th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier-Saunders.Carmichael, E., & Farrell, H. (2012). Evaluation of the effectiveness of online resources in developing student critical thinking:
Review of literature and case study of a critical thinking online site [Journal]. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/EJ974914.pdf
Clifton, S. L. & Schriner, C.L. (2010). Assessing the quality of multiple choice test items. Nursing Educator, 35(1). 25-34.Flannelly, L. T. (2001). Using feedback to reduce students’ judgment bias on test questions. Journal of Nursing Education, 40. 10-
16.Founds, S. Z. (2011). Development of high-fidelity simulated clinical experiences for baccalaureate nursing students. Journal of
Professional Nursing , 27 (1), 5-9.Garrett, B. , MacPhee, M., & Jackson, C. (2010). High-fidelity patient simulation: Considerations for effective learning. Nursing
Education Perspectives, 31(5), 309-313.Hall, M., Daly, B., & Madigan, E. (2010). Use of anecdotal notes by clinical nursing faculty: a descriptive study. The Journal Of
Nursing Education, 49(3), 156-159. doi:10.3928/01484834-20090915-03Hill, C. (2006). Integrating clinical experience into the concept mapping process. Nurse Educator, 31(1). 36-39.Jeffries, P. (2007). Simulation in nursing education: From conceptualization to evaluation. New York, NY: National League for
Nursing.Oermann, M.H., Yarbrough, S. S., Saewert, K. J., Ard, N., & Charasika,M. E. (2009). Clinical evaluations and grading practices in
schools of nursing: National survey findings Part II. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(6). 352-357.Pacsi, A. (2008). Human simulators in nursing education. Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association , 39 (2), 8-11.Polit, D. F. & Beck, C.T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins.Reed, S. J. (2010). Designing a simulation for student evaluations using Scriven’s key evaluation checklist. Clinical Simulation in
Nursing, 6(2). 41-44.Vetter, R. E. (2009). Learning to be an effective teacher: strengthening observational skills. Missouri Journal of Health, Physical
Education, Recreation, and Dance , 19, 4-14.Williams, S. M. & Beattie, H. J. (2006). Problem based learning in the clinical setting- A systemic review. Nurse Education Today,
28(2). 146-154.