Critical Thinking
-
Upload
linda-rush -
Category
Documents
-
view
673 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Critical Thinking
Critical ThinkingDr Linda Rush Vice Dean, Teacher Education
Learning OutcomesTo critically explore what it means to ‘critically
think’ and its relationship to ‘critical reflection’
To critically explore what it means to ‘critically think’ and its application within learning and teaching
Concept AnalysisIn pairs
Mindmap the phrase “critical thinking”
From the mindmap create categories or emerging themes
From the categories construct a sentence which offers your definition of critical thinking
Critical Thinking: First Thoughts….Akin to the process of learning
‘Critical’ element suggests something more than the process of ‘thinking’
Associated with the reprocessing of material that has been learnt
Implication that subject material is complex and that understanding is required
Implication that there is a rationale for the process* and an outcome, or a judgement (*idea that evidence is assessed in the process)
Word ‘critical’ often associated with negative comments
Definition 1Mitchell and Andrews (2000) take a technical
view of the process of critical thinking:
“…a cognitive ability that can be increased by the knowledge and rules of logic and practice of them.”
Definition 2Other approaches to the defining of critical
thinking are less rule bound.
A common approach is to identify the component processes, skills and abilities in critical thinking:
‘working through for oneself, afresh, a problem’ (Kneale, 2003).
Kneale identifies processes as ‘critically evaluating’, making judgements, awareness of bias, ‘commenting in a thoughtful way’
Definition 3Marshal & Rowland (1998) talk of ‘fundamental
elements’ of critical thinking:
“…the presentation of arguments to persuade…debate and negotiating positions…reflection…it is a communicative activity…it has as its outcome making a decision and acting on what you come to think and believe and it involves emotion as well as reason and rationality.”
Definition 4Cotterell (1999) posits the notion of a sequence
approach in which a series of stages are given for reader/writer to follow in order to arrive at a conclusion of some sort:
“identify the line of reasoning; critically evaluate the line of reasoning; question surface appearances; identify evidence in text; evaluate the evidence; identify the writer’s conclusions; and evaluate whether the evidence supports the conclusions.”
Definition 5Critical thinking is also described in relation to
pedagogical issues.
From the outset there is a concern not to capture a tight definition but to facilitate the development of critical thinking in the ‘classroom’.
Brookfield’s (1987) advocates processes of trying to awaken, prompt, nurture and encourage the process. Critical thinking here, it is argued, should be fostered through the engagement of students’ interests and motivation via a facilitated environment.
Definition 6Ronald Barnett considers critical thinking as an
element of the taking of a critical stance – an acquired disposition towards knowledge and action.
‘Developmental epistemology’ is an emerging body of work that describes the developing manner in which students conceive of the nature of knowledge.
William Perry'sScheme of Intellectual and Ethical Development
Dualism/Received Knowledge:There are right/wrong answers, engraved on Golden Tablets in the sky, known to Authorities.
Multiplicity/Subjective Knowledge:There are conflicting answers;therefore, students must trust their "inner voices", not external Authority.
Multiplicity/Subjective Knowledge:There are conflicting answers;therefore, students must trust their "inner voices", not external Authority.
At this point, some students become alienated, and either retreat to an earlier ("safer") position ("I think I'll study math, not literature, because there are clear answers and not as much uncertainty") or else escape (drop out) ("I can't stand college; all they want is right answers" or else "I can't stand college; no one gives you the right answers".)
Relativism/Procedural Knowledge:There are disciplinary reasoning methods:Connected knowledge: empathetic (why do you believe X?; what does this poem say to me?)vs. Separated knowledge: "objective analysis" (what techniques can I use to analyze this poem?)
Commitment/Constructed Knowledge:Integration of knowledge learned from others with personal experience and reflection.
Commitment:Student makes a commitment.
Challenges to Commitment:Student experiences implications of commitment.Student explores issues of responsibility.
"Post-Commitment":Student realizes
Critical Thinking: writing
The obvious link between critical thinking and writing is the use of writing to represent the process of thinking.
The capacity to write clearly and precisely is particularly associated with critical thinking, both in sequencing and layout of evidence and in the broader summing up of the case.
The production of a paper ‘version’ of our thoughts provides a chance for review. It is a chance to engage with metacognition about our own thinking as we judge whether the material on paper says what we need it to say – and we duly revise it, or not.
Critical Thinking: writing
Aspects of peer review is the consideration of reference list. Initially we see references as an acknowledgement of sources, but it is also much to do with the breadth of consideration and the quality of evidence consulted ie the critical thinking processes.
Critical thinking in its draft written form most clearly interacts with thinking and learning – when ideas are explored, ‘toyed-with’, tried out as a note book. The scribble of an idea, concept maps and other graphic depictions, layouts of ideas, lists and plans all come into this group. This is an under explored form of writing that has much to do with critical thinking in the process of HE.
Critical Thinking: Pedagogy
Ref Jenny Moon’s discussion paper:
Teaching of philosophy or theory of knowledge
Talking about epistemology and the process of critical thinking
Critical thinking about ‘real life’ issues
Placements and out-of-class activities
Critical Thinking: PedagogyUse of reflection to enhance critical
thinking
The deliberate provision of ‘thinking time’
Encouraging critical thinking through the process of assessment
Oral critical thinking
Writing and critical thinking
Critical reflection and critical thinkingBrookfield (1987) key components of critical
thinking:-
Identifying and challenging assumptions
Imagining and exploring alternative ways of thinking and acting
Atkins (2000 in Burns and Bulman p30)
Take place during the critical analysis element of a reflective framework
Using a reflective framework in reflective writingDescription - demonstrates clear
understanding of the relevant and important issues, well structured and concise
Feelings - beneath the surface.
Demands “emotional intelligence”
The ability to recognise and manage emotions in yourself and others (Mortiboys 2002)
Critical AnalysisCritical Analysis -Identify and illuminate
existing knowledge of relevance, challenge assumptions, explore alternatives. Separate the whole into its component parts
Synthesis“The integration of the new knowledge,
feelings or attitudes with previous knowledge, feelings or attitudes. This is necessary in order to develop a fresh insight or a new perspective on a situation and learn from it” (Atkins 2002:46)
Martin (1999) suggests contemporary staff need to manage paradox and be constantly adaptive
Evaluation: the ability to make a judgement about the value of something, looking back…but it is also future orientated
A thought for the future…A fully functioning person is an ever changing
person….personal growth is marked by a degree of disorganisation followed by reorganisation which necessitates acceptance of self (based on Rogers, and Martin 1999)