Critical Success Factors - Welcome to City of Woodbury, MN...The critical success factors are:...
Transcript of Critical Success Factors - Welcome to City of Woodbury, MN...The critical success factors are:...
Critical Success Factors
2014 Report
Safety Quality of Life
Business Climate
Education Community City Services Sustainability
City of Woodbury
8301 Valley Creek Road
Woodbury, MN 55125
Every organization exists to achieve a certain purpose. In order
to achieve those purposes, there are a certain number of things
that it must do well. This is as true for a community as much as
any other entity. The City Council has identified a list of critical
success factors, which the community must do well in order to
remain and develop as a desirable living and working environ-
ment. These factors are safety, quality of life, business climate,
education, community, city services, and sustainability. In many
cases these factors go beyond areas that are the exclusive, or
even primary, responsibility of the city organization. As a result,
each section is lead by a statement that explains the role the city
intends to play in regard to that factor.
Critical Success Factor Page
Safety……………………………………………..........2
Quality of Life………………………………………… 6
Business Climate……………………………………... 10
Education……………………………………………… 14
Community………………………………………......... 16
City Services…………………………………………... 17
Sustainability……….…………………………………..19
“The American city should be a collection of communities where every
member has a right to belong. It should be a place where every man
feels safe on his streets and in the house of his friends. It should be a
place where each individual's dignity and self-respect is strengthened by
the respect and affection of his neighbors. It should be a place where
each of us can find the satisfaction and warmth which comes from being
a member of the community of man. This is what man sought at the
dawn of civilization. It is what we seek today.”
~Lyndon B. Johnson
CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS
20
14 C
20
14 C
20
14 C
RIT
ICA
LR
ITIC
AL
RIT
ICA
L SS S
UC
CESS
UC
CESS
UC
CESS FF F
AC
TO
RS
AC
TO
RS
AC
TO
RS RR R
EPO
RT
EPO
RT
EPO
RT
August 19, 2015
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of the City Council
City of Woodbury
Subject: 2014 Critical Success Factors Report
Dear Mayor Giuliani Stephens and Council Members:
City staff and I are pleased to present the 2014 Critical Success Factors Report. The City Council
identified the list of Critical Success Factors many years ago, believing that a community must
do well in these areas in order develop and sustain a desirable living and working environment.
The critical success factors are: safety, quality of life, business climate, education, community,
city services and sustainability. In many cases these factors go beyond areas that are the
exclusive, or even primary, responsibility of a city organization. At the beginning of each section
is a statement that explains the role the city intends to play in regard to that factor.
This report is intended to be used in conjunction with the 2014 Performance Report to provide
the City Council and the citizens of Woodbury with an honest and in-depth analysis of
Woodbury as a city and community. Performance measures are used in this report as a tool for
evaluating the city’s success in the seven areas. The Critical Success Factors Report is macro-
focused and it provides mainly high-level outcome measures. The companion Performance
Report provides an array of information ranging from the micro-level details to many of the
same outcome measures that are included in this report. Where possible, comparative data from
the International City/County Management Association’s Center for Performance Measurement
and other sources has been used to provide context to how well Woodbury is doing compared to
its peers.
I hope the City Council and the citizens of Woodbury find this report useful in evaluating
Woodbury’s success as a community and I would appreciate any feedback the Council has on
ways to improve the information and its presentation.
Respectfully submitted,
Clinton P. Gridley
City Administrator
- 2 -
Safety
Police Department
Woodbury residents feel safe in their person and their property. The city provides high quality, visible, protective services and works with other agencies serving our citizens to provide similarly high quality services.
Performance Indicator: Percentage of residents who feel very safe or reasonably safe walking in their neighborhoods at night (Woodbury Community Surveys):
Performance Indicator: Percentage of residents rating the safety of city park and recreational facilities as either excellent or good (Woodbury Community Surveys):
- 3 -
Safety
Performance Indicator: Woodbury Part I and Part II crime rates per 1,000 residents by year:
City
Part I
Crimes Population
Part I Crimes
per 1,000
Population
Maplewood 1,978 39,054 51
Bloomington 3,423 86,652 40
Burnsville 1,836 61,747 30
Savage 630 29,047 22
Inver Grove Heights 754 34,831 22
Apple Valley 1,088 50,330 22
Shakopee 825 39,523 21
Woodbury 1,309 66,119 20
Maple Grove 1,202 64,448 19
Edina 918 50,261 18
Eagan 1,206 66,810 18
Minnetonka 818 51,144 16
Plymouth 1,119 73,633 15
Eden Prairie 874 62,593 14
Shoreview 311 25,723 12
Lakeville 699 59,361 12
homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault,
burglary, theft, auto theft and arson
Part I crimes include:
City
Part II
Crimes Population
Part II Crimes
per 1,000
Population
Bloomington 5,344 86,652 62
Burnsville 2,844 61,747 46
Savage 1,294 29,047 45
Maplewood 1,438 39,054 37
Shakopee 1,321 39,523 33
Apple Valley 1,640 50,330 33
Woodbury 1,929 66,119 29
Inver Grove Heights 955 34,831 27
Maple Grove 1,588 64,448 25
Eagan 1,544 66,810 23
Minnetonka 1,165 51,144 23
Plymouth 1,627 73,633 22
Lakeville 1,192 59,361 20
Eden Prairie 1,075 62,593 17
Shoreview 362 25,723 14
Edina 653 50,261 13
Part II crimes include all other criminal offenses
City
Part I & II
Crimes Population
Part I & II
Crimes
per 1,000
Population
Bloomington 8,767 86,652 101
Maplewood 3,416 39,054 87
Burnsville 4,680 61,747 76
Savage 1,924 29,047 66
Shakopee 2,146 39,523 54
Apple Valley 2,728 50,330 54
Inver Grove Heights 1,709 34,831 49
Woodbury 3,238 66,119 49
Maple Grove 2,790 64,448 43
Eagan 2,750 66,810 41
Minnetonka 1,983 51,144 39
Plymouth 2,746 73,633 37
Lakeville 1,891 59,361 32
Edina 1,571 50,261 31
Eden Prairie 1,949 62,593 31
Shoreview 673 25,723 26
- 4 -
Safety
Performance Indicator: Emergency response times and response standards.
Average response times (in minutes) for public safety emergency calls. The current Public Safety records management system is unable to interpret emergency from non-emergency responses. Staff would have to analyze data from a random sample of police incidents, in which it is believed the officer responded in emergency mode, creating an inaccurate and unreliable estimate.
Fire Department
Performance Indicator: Five fire personnel respond on the scene in less than nine minutes 90 percent of the time.
Performance Indicator: Sustain major fire response - six additional personnel on the scene in less than 13 minutes 90 percent of the time.
- 5 -
Safety
Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
Performance Indicator: Average response time
Number of minutes from paramedic’s receipt of call to arrival on scene.
Performance Indicator: Response standards
(1) Paramedic response – on scene in less than five minutes at least 90 percent of the time.
(2) Ambulance response – percentage of time on scene with two paramedics in less than 11
minutes, at least 90% of the time.
- 6 -
Quality of Life
Woodbury maintains a high quality living environment characterized by attractive neighborhoods that offer a variety of housing options for people in all stages of life and that are linked through the city’s park and trail system. The city provides open spaces that allow active and passive uses by the public. Residents have convenient access to essential private sector goods and services such as health care, as well as to high quality year-round leisure and recreational services. The city directly implements those aspects of the physical and service environment for which it is responsible and promotes the provision of desired services by private and other governmental agencies in areas outside its own responsibility. Performance Indicator: Percentage of residents rating the quality of life as “excellent” or “good” in the Woodbury Community Survey. Woodbury residents have continually rated their quality of life with high marks. According to National Research Center, Inc., more than 9 in 10 Woodbury residents rated their overall quality of life as “good” or “excellent.”
- 7 -
Quality of Life
Performance Indicator: Access to Recreational Amenities.
Miles of trails maintained by the city per 1,000 households:
Number of acres in the park system per 1,000 households:
- 8 -
Quality of Life Performance Indicator: Access to a variety of housing options. Percentage of housing stock meeting definitions of affordability (rental and owner-occupied):
Housing Type 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Rental: 8.2% 8.2% 8.2% 7.6% 7.6% 8.7% 8.7%
Owner-occupied: 28.2% 31.5% 45.0% 43.6% 46.9% 51.8% 39.95%
The statistics displayed for 2008 through 2014 provide an estimate of the affordability of Woodbury’s housing stock. This measure follows generally accepted federal and regional guidelines on housing affordability, which are based on housing value and do not take into account all the aspects that make housing “affordable.” Ownership in 2014 is down to due significant value increase in community being greater than income increase.
Variety of housing types built (single family, multi-family, and apartment):
- 9 -
Quality of Life Change in average value of residential properties (compared to Washington County):
Woodbury 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Average Residential Value $283,100 $258,100 $253,300 $235,700 $245,000 $285,200
% change from previous year -6.8% -8.8% -1.9% -6.9% 3.9% 16.4%
Washington County
Average Residential Value $297,800 $264,700 $254,400 $235,200 241,800 $274,200
% change from previous year -3.1% -11.1% -3.9% -7.5% 2.8% 13.4%
Data source: 2014 Assessment Report, Washington County Assessors Division
Performance Indicator: Access to Private Sector Goods and Services
According to the Department of Employment and Economic Development, the number of business
enterprises continues to grow in Woodbury. One of the most noticeable sectors of job growth continues
to be in medical field. The health care sector has seen consistent growth in Woodbury since the
establishment of the Medical Campus District and the arrival of the Woodwinds hospital campus.
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Number of Businesses 1,265 1,282 1,295 1,297 1,372 1,364
Number of Health Care Businesses 142 153 164 172 183 188
Data Source: MN DEED Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages
- 10 -
Business Climate
Recognizing that economic vitality is the foundation of community progress and livability, the City of Woodbury will continue to capitalize on its unique strengths and distinct character: a strategic location, strong demographics, and abundant opportunities for economic growth. Through its strategic planning efforts, the City will continually seek to strengthen business relationships and promote continued business investment and job growth. Woodbury’s business friendly environment, responsive service and development standards that demand high quality, contribute to our strong business climate, help make Woodbury a premier location for business, and position the city for sustained success. Performance Indicator: New Business Investment
Square footage and permit value of commercial property added each year:
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
$3.3 $16.3 $1.1 $3.1 $10.0 $20.5
Value of New Commercial Tax Base Added (in millions)
Building on the previous year’s success, 2014 saw both new construction and reinvestment activities
continue their upward trajectory. In 2014, Woodbury saw ten new commercial buildings begin
construction, with a total of 185,926 square feet with an approximate value of $19.5 million. These ten
projects included:
1. Jerry’s Foods: 79,162 square feet
2. Children’s Hospitals and Clinics: 21,455 square feet
3. HealthEast Clinic – Tamarack: 18,940 square feet
4. Commerce Hill Retail: 17,170 square feet
5. Bielenberg Gardens Retail: 12,350 square feet
- 11 -
Business climate
Performance Indicator: Business Outreach Number of new business proposals sent
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
5 9 9 11 13 10
Number of Business Proposals Sent
Proposals include financing packages, brochures with potential sites, and financing considerations.
Number of business outreach meetings
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
0 0 44 23 26 16
Number of Business Retention Meetings
Performance Indicator: Business Reinvestment
Leasehold improvements (value and number of permits)
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Number of Permits 84 154 110 155 120 150
Value in Millions 10.2$ 20.0$ 14.9$ 20.1$ 23.3$ 33.3$
Leasehold Improvements (Value and Number of Permits)
Performance Indicator: Jobs (Employment) in the City of Woodbury.
Jobs in the City of Woodbury during the Second Quarter
Data source: Data Source: DEED QCEW Second Quarter 2014
- 12 -
Business climate
Performance Indicator: Employment continued
Employment in Woodbury by industry
Data Source: DEED QCEW Second Quarter 2013
Unemployment Rates in December for Woodbury, Minnesota, and the nation
Data Source: DEED Local Area Unemployment Statistics (LAUS)
- 13 -
Business climate
Performance Indicator: Balanced supply of commercial development.
Estimated cumulative amount of retail and non-retail commercial development This chart shows the relative amount of retail spaces (4.3 million square feet) as compared to the amount of office and industrial space (5.4 million square feet) in the city.
Performance Indicator: Vacant single-tenant commercial buildings.
Number of buildings and square footage
2013 2014
Number of Buildings 2 4
Cumulative Sq. Ft. 460,096 502,725
Vacant Single-Tenant Commercial Buildings
The four vacant single-tenant commercial buildings in 2014 are Sinclair Station, Pizza Hut, City Place Big Building, and Medical Care Development International (MCDI).
- 14 -
Education
Statement: The City of Woodbury understands the great importance of having quality educational programs and facilities in our community. In order to support these efforts, the city continually seeks build to upon our partnership with the school district by supporting their building needs and by maintaining a safe, positive environment for Woodbury schools. Performance Indicator: Percentage of residents rating the quality of education provided by their school district as excellent or good (Woodbury Community Surveys):
- 15 -
Education
Performance Indicator: Graduation and attendance rates: Woodbury residents are served by three public school districts. The South Washington County School District covers a majority of the city, but a portion of the northeast corner of Woodbury is served by the Stillwater Area School District and a piece of the northwest corner of the city is served by the North St. Paul-Maplewood School District. The tables and graphs to the right provide a snapshot of some key data for each district along with statewide data for comparative purposes.
School District
Four-Year
Graduation Rate
(2013-2014)
Attendance Rate
(2013-2014)
K-12 Students
Served (2013-2014)
Stillwater Area 88.6% 93.9% 8,229
South Wash. County 92.5% 95.7% 17,808
North St. Paul-Maple 81.2% 95.1% 10,603
State of MN 81.2% 94.8% 857,039
- 16 -
Community
The citizens of Woodbury have a strong sense of community, and their level of civic and community engagement continues to be one of the city’s most valuable resources. The city is committed to building upon our already strong partnerships with community organizations, and it continually seeks to support these organizations to help create an even deeper sense of community. Performance Indicator: Percentage of residents rating the general sense of community among Woodbury residents as “excellent” or “good” on the community survey.
- 17 -
City Services
The city seeks to provide efficient and cost-effective services through the use of appropriate technology, equipment, and infrastructure. The city measures these services by the satisfaction level of our residents and benchmarks this level of satisfaction against Twin Cities metropolitan suburbs. Performance Indicator: Percentage of residents who rate the general value of city services as excellent or good in the community survey:
Performance Indicator: Average city property tax rate compared to the metropolitan average.
League of Minnesota Cities Property Tax Report
- 18 -
City Services
Performance Indicator: Percentage of respondents rating core city services as excellent or good in the biennial community survey. According to National Research Center Inc., Woodbury’s ratings tended to be similar to or higher than other communities across the nation and similar to other communities within Minnesota and communities of similar size.
- 19 -
Sustainability
Woodbury strives to be a sustainable community that promotes community health and wellness through the protection of the environment. The city assesses and improves its development practices, city and community energy use, and use of its natural resources in order to not use resources at the expense of future generations. The city's role is to establish and implement policies, guidelines, goals and strategic actions to protect air and water quality, preserve natural areas, conserve energy, and reduce waste. Performance Indicator: Average grade of lake water quality according to the Metropolitan Council’s Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP). . Water quality can change significantly from year-to-year due to changes in weather conditions such as rainfall amount and distribution, temperature and number of sunny days. It is also affected by human activities such as soil erosion from construction, land use changes, and lawn care practices. The Metropolitan Council’s CAMP program uses citizen volunteers to test and monitor the water quality of metropolitan lakes. The data collected is then analyzed by the Metropolitan Council and each lake is given an overall water quality grade. The overall average grade for Woodbury lakes increased to 2.4 out of 4. Carver Lake and Powers Lake are deeper, and have the potential for better water quality. Powers Lake seems to be showing improvement, which may be attributable to the many projects that have been implemented under the Powers Lake Management Plan.
Data Source: Metropolitan Council, 2013 Lake Water Quality Report
Lake Name 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Lake
Average
Battle Creek 3 3 2 3 3 2.80
Carver 2 2 2 3 2.4 2.28
Colby 1 1 0 1 0 NA 1 1 0 1 1 0.70
La NA 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 1.90
Markgrafs 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1.3 0.75
Powers 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 4 4 2.7 2.61
Wilmes 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2.00
Average 1.5 1.6 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1.6 1.9 1.9 2.4 2.1 1.7
- 20 -
Sustainability
Performance Indicator: Recycling
Number of tons recycled and recycled pounds per household
Performance Indicator: Energy used at city facilities
BTUs per square foot
- 21 -
Sustainability
Performance Indicator: Fuel use
Performance Indicator: Water use
Conserving water is important in order to maintain aquifer levels, water quality, and to avoid
unnecessary expenses for new water infrastructure.
Residential per capita water usage, gallons per day.