Critical Analysis

4
Herrera 1 Marjorie Herrera Daniel Powell ENC 3241 February 6, 2015 Critical Analysis One: Technical Reports In this critical analysis the reports that will be compared will be The Art of Digital Publishing: A foundation of combined standards to support the future of publishing written by Daniel Lynch and Content Conditioning and Distribution for Dynamic Virtual Worlds, written by Jeffrey Terrace. In this analysis we will compare which author is the stronger communicator also which author demonstrate a stronger design principle. We will compare each author’s approach to syntax and cadence while also citing a piece of each author’s work. We will also compare how each write excels in their written reports and we will compare which is the stronger report. Both authors come off as good communicators but one more than the other. Daniel Lynch began with a great abstract. Just about every sentence was pulled out of his report. Although his

description

Critical analysis comparing "The Art of Digital Publishing: A foundation of combined standards to support the future of publishing" written by Daniel Lynch and "Content Conditioning and Distribution for Dynamic Virtual Worlds", written by Jeffrey Terrace.

Transcript of Critical Analysis

Herrera 3

Marjorie Herrera

Daniel Powell

ENC 3241

February 6, 2015

Critical Analysis One: Technical Reports

In this critical analysis the reports that will be compared will be The Art of Digital Publishing: A foundation of combined standards to support the future of publishing written by Daniel Lynch and Content Conditioning and Distribution for Dynamic Virtual Worlds, written by Jeffrey Terrace. In this analysis we will compare which author is the stronger communicator also which author demonstrate a stronger design principle. We will compare each authors approach to syntax and cadence while also citing a piece of each authors work. We will also compare how each write excels in their written reports and we will compare which is the stronger report.

Both authors come off as good communicators but one more than the other. Daniel Lynch began with a great abstract. Just about every sentence was pulled out of his report. Although his abstract started off as just one long paragraph he used short and concrete sentences. He gave a small insight into the format the latter parts of his report. His paragraphs were short and made up of just a few short sentences with the occasional long paragraph. He made references to other authors that have touched based in one way or another to what he is discussing. He also wrote on a subject that may interest many of the population being that it touches base on todays technology and education system. Although I must mention, Jeffrey Terraces opening his introduction was definitely great. It especially is great for grabbing a readers attention.

Terrace demonstrated stronger design principles. His report was written as a dissertation for a doctoral degree. The length of his report was perfect for its purpose. He was able to determine the amount of knowledge his readers would have in regards to the subject that he was writing about. In knowing that he was writing a dissertation for a doctoral degree we was able to research and follow the format and style that was expected of him. Determining the knowledge of his readers on the subject and following the given format of writing a dissertation were both part of him adjusting the writing style to the reader, the purpose and the context. Terrace adjusting the writing style demonstrated stronger design principles.

Lynchs short sentences and short paragraphs help a reader read through the report in a fluent manner which keep the tone of the report. He gives great examples and uses metaphors to give great examples. Just as music notation is what enables an orchestra to play in a synchronized manner, standards can enable us to document science in a harmonious way. (Lynch, 10). Using metaphors and making examples as the above help the tone of report a bit less serious and approachable for any reader that is interested and willing to read the report.

The stronger report seems to be The Art of Digital Publishing: A foundation of combined standards to support the future of publishing written by Daniel Lynch. He pay close attention to his format. He kept all of his paragraphs short and his sentences were also short but still concrete making his paragraphs easy to read and comprehend. He makes use of resources that he has at hand. He makes reference to other published authors within and out of his field of study. He quotes authors that were published dating back to 1979 and more current authors that were published in 2006.

In critically analyzing the reports The Art of Digital Publishing: A foundation of combined standards to support the future of publishing by Daniel Lynch and Content Conditioning and Distribution for Dynamic Virtual Worlds written by Jeffrey Terrace we identified which of the authors was the stronger communicator and which of the authors demonstrated stronger design principles. We analyzed and identified which author had a better approach to syntax and cadence within their reports. Finally, we also identified which of the two was the stronger report.