Criminals in Love Review
-
Upload
farah-khan -
Category
Documents
-
view
15 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Criminals in Love Review
Criminals In Love Personal Response Paper
-By Farah Khan
Criminals In Love is a comedy about how a teenager, Junior, gets himself and
his girlfriend sucked into what he perceives to be his destiny—the family business
of crime.
As I walked into the theater, rock music was playing and the stage was lit
dimly but evenly, providing a dark atmosphere. Most of the set was made to look
like concrete with a slight slope and some cracks, suggesting a decrepit urban
environment, and a wall partially separated the interior and exterior space. The
dated look of the aluminum trash cans as well as the patterned futon and table
lamps suggested the time period to be around the 1980s.
I was at first a little worried about the interior and exterior spaces bleeding
into each other during the play, but the lighting technician did a good job in
distinguishing the spaces, and the actors did a good job keeping within those spaces.
This containment of space throughout the play served to reinforce the oppressive
feeling that Junior and his friends face under his so-called destiny.
To offset the dark theme of being trapped by one’s (self-imposed) fate, there
was an outrageous comedy element that commented on the ridiculousness of the
notion. Henry, with his slicked back hair, and Wineva in her freedom fighter
headband and bellbottoms were almost cartoonish representations of adults, who
had their heyday in the 70s. In contrast, the teenagers didn’t dress like stereotypical
80s teens. Rather, their costumes were very tame, and almost too modern. This
difference in costume makes the notion that Henry and Wineva had power over the
teenagers’ destiny laughable, and unbelievable. And it was true, Henry and Wineva
didn’t actually control Junior’s fate; it was Junior’s own belief of fate that trapped
him and his friends.
As far as the acting goes, Christian Muniz, playing William, stood out to me
the most. The way he moved was very heavy for the most part, which made sense as
his character mentioned feeling “dragged down”. The enunciated accent that he
used was also interesting because it distinguished William as a bum who saw
himself as an intellectual. His comedic timing was excellent and he delivered his
lines in earnest.
Wineva was another character who stood out to me. Although Mae McDowell
played her in a cartoonish fashion—especially with the maniacal laughter—she
stayed true to the character, who was supposed to be outlandish to begin with. She
bounced from informatively quiet and falsely loving to loud, angry, and passionate
at the drop of a hat, and she definitely commanded attention with her presence and
devotion to pushing the other actors around.
The scenes with Sandy (Hanna Yang) and Gail (Erin Patterson), are the ones
where I saw the most truth in relationships. In the first scene where Sandy and Gail
are together after Sandy’s shift, they are close and comfortable. It feels real that they
are friends. When they meet out late on the streets, they keep a distance from each
other, each girl perhaps a little ashamed at what she’s been up to, and not wanting
to discuss much with the other. They even threaten to tell each other’s mothers.
Erin also played her scenes with Chaz Atkinson convincingly. They had many
great non-verbal interactions, particularly when William or Wineva were acting
ridiculous. The romantic bits, though, seemed a little forced. William and Junior’s
father-son-relationship also fell short to me, so when William encountered Henry,
his anger seemed to be out of nowhere.
The play engaged me on one level in that I could sort of relate to the self-
imposed trapped-in-a-box feeling that Junior had. For a long time, I blamed my
parents for sheltering me from people. I always thought, unless it was with other
Bangladeshi people, they wouldn’t let me spend time with friends. I would
automatically turn down invitations with the excuse, “my parents probably won’t let
me”, but this was a sentiment that I just kept from when I was younger, and I hadn’t
realized they would trust my judgment better the older I got. After I started asking
them, though, they were absolutely fine with letting me hang out with my friends
outside of school. In the play, what’s at stake for Junior is the guilt of leaving his
father to die—the same father who doesn’t care about him. He is pushed around by
Henry and Wineva, and instead of taking the ample time outside of Wineva’s
presence to find a solution—such as reporting Wineva and his uncle (who are the
main threat), he continues to let himself, and his friends be pulled down further
from being accessories to accomplices, to (unintentional) conspirators of crime, to
criminals avoiding arrest.
As I walked out of the theater, I was relaxed. The comedy may have
overpowered the drama for me, but the play was done well enough. One moment
that still stays in my mind is when the bomb went off. The flash of lighting was very
well-timed there. Another was when Gail encounters Sandy on the street. The
ambient city noises and occasional flashes of “car lights” aided the mood.