CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I SYLLABUS (August3, 2015).doc

3
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE SYLLABUS Ateneo de Manila University Prof. Tranquil S. Salvador III Part I A. Venue in Criminal Cases is Jurisdictional 1. Pilipinas Shell v. Romars International, G.R. No. 189669, February 16, 2015 2. People v. Taroy, G.R. No. 192466, September 7, 2011 3. Hector Trenas v. People, G. R. No. 195002, January 25, 2012 B. Jurisdiction to Issue Hold Departure Orders (Regular Courts Distinguished with the Sandiganbayan) 1. Father Reyes v. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 182161, December 03, 2009 2. Mondejar v. Buban, A.M. No. MTJ-01-1349, July 12, 2001 3. Mupas v. Espanol, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1850, July 14, 2004 C. Jurisdiction is conferred by law and determined by the allegations of the Complaint 1. Dazon v. Yap, G.R. No. 157095, January 15, 2010 2. Foz v. People, October 9, 2009, G.R. No. 167764 D. Creation of the Sandiganbayan Section 4, Article XI of the 1987 Constitution Presidential Decree 1486 dated June 11, 1978 Presidential Decree 1606 dated December 10, 1978 Presidential Decree 1861

Transcript of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I SYLLABUS (August3, 2015).doc

Page 1: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I SYLLABUS (August3, 2015).doc

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE SYLLABUSAteneo de Manila UniversityProf. Tranquil S. Salvador III

Part I

A. Venue in Criminal Cases is Jurisdictional

1. Pilipinas Shell v. Romars International, G.R. No. 189669, February 16, 2015

2. People v. Taroy, G.R. No. 192466, September 7, 2011 3. Hector Trenas v. People, G. R. No. 195002, January 25, 2012

B. Jurisdiction to Issue Hold Departure Orders (Regular Courts Distinguished with the Sandiganbayan)

1. Father Reyes v. Court of Appeals, G. R. No. 182161, December 03, 20092. Mondejar v. Buban, A.M. No. MTJ-01-1349, July 12, 20013. Mupas v. Espanol, A.M. No. RTJ-04-1850, July 14, 2004

C. Jurisdiction is conferred by law and determined by the allegations of the Complaint

1. Dazon v. Yap, G.R. No. 157095, January 15, 20102. Foz v. People, October 9, 2009, G.R. No. 167764

D. Creation of the Sandiganbayan

Section 4, Article XI of the 1987 ConstitutionPresidential Decree 1486 dated June 11, 1978Presidential Decree 1606 dated December 10, 1978Presidential Decree 1861 Republic Act 7995 approved March 10, 1995Republic Act 8249 approved February 5, 1997

E. Jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan

1. People v. Sandiganbayan, August 25, 2009, G.R. No. 1673042. Serrana v. Sandiganbayan, January 22, 2008, G.R. 1620593. Garcia v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. NO. 165835, June 22, 2005

F. Dismissal of the Complaint because of inordinate delay

1. Tatad v. Sandiganbayan, 159 SCRA 70

Page 2: CRIMINAL PROCEDURE PART I SYLLABUS (August3, 2015).doc

2. People v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 188165, December 11, 2013

G. Anti-Graft Cases in the Sandiganbayan

1. Venus v. Desierto, 298 SCRA 2192. Magcusi v. Sandiganbayan, 240 SCRA 133. Sistoza v. Desierto , G.R. No. 144784, September 3, 2002

H. Jurisdiction of the Ombudsman

1. Department of Justice v. Liwag, February 11, 2005, G.R. No. 1493112. Lazatin v. Desierto, June 5, 2009, G.R. No. 1470973. Angeles v. Merceditas Gutierrez, G.R. Nos. 189161 & 189173, March 21,

20124. Gonzales v. Office of the President, G.R. No. 196231, January 28, 2014

I. Review of Decisions of the Ombudsman

1. Antonino v. Desierto, December 18, 2008, G.R. No. 1444922. Enemecio v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 146731, January 13,

20043. Baviera v. Zoleta, G.R. NO. 169098, October 12, 2006

J. Procedure before the Ombudsman

1. Sesbreno v. Aglugub, February 28, 2005, A.M. No. MTJ 05-1581 2. Enriquez v. Caminade, A.M. NO. RTJ-05-1966, March 21, 2006

I. Power of the Secretary of Justice over Prosecutors

1. Dino et al. v. Olivarez, G.R. No. 170447, December 04, 2009

J. Role of the Office of the Solicitor General in Criminal Cases

1. People v. Duca, October 9, 2009, G.R. No. 171175 2. Republic v. Iyoy, G.R. NO. 152577, September 21, 2005