CREEKSIDE SCHOOL FY2017-18 · Mrs. Kathy DeWinter Parent Mrs. Tracy Degracia Parent Mr. Bob Jeswald...

CREEKSIDE SCHOOL

FY2017-18

Creekside School May 12, 2017 ● of 44

A. SCHOOLWIDE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SIP)

TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAM (SWP) PLAN

NAME OF SCHOOL/PRINCIPAL: Creekside School

Principal, Dr. Dan Lomax

8403 GA Hwy. 315

Cataula, GA 31804

NAME OF DISTRICT/SUPERINTENDENT:

Harris County School District

Superintendent, Dr. James D. Martin

132 Barnes Mill Rd.

Hamilton, GA 31811

□ Comprehensive Support School □ Targeted Support School □ Schoolwide Title 1 School□ Targeted Assistance Title 1 School □

Non-Title 1 School □ Opportunity School

X

Division of School and District Effectiveness | School Improvement PLAN


DIVISION OF SCHOOL AND DISTRICT EFFECTIVENESS

B. Advancing Leadership | Transforming Schools

All required components of the Title I Schoolwide and Targeted Assistance are included in this template.

Planning Committee Members (SW- 7, 9, 14, 15, 18)

SIGNATURES:

Superintendent _______________________________________________ Date ________________

Principal Supervisor ___________________________________________ Date ________________

Principal ____________________________________________________ Date ________________

Title I Director _______________________________________________ Date ________________

(Title I Schools only)

Name Position/Role Signature

Dr. Dan Lomax Principal

Mrs. Shurlane Josey Assistant Principal

Mrs. Patricia Holloway Parental Involvement Coordinator

Ms. Deborah Chambers Special Education Teacher – 5th& 6th grades

Mrs. Holly Ferrone Teacher – 5th Grade

Mrs. Samantha Harrison Teacher – 5thGrade

Mrs. Latina Maddox Teacher – 5thGrade

Mrs. Chelsea Woodall Teacher – 5thGrade

Mrs. Angie Everson Teacher – 6th Grade

Mrs. Heather Martin Teacher – 6th Grade

Ms. Stacy Strickland Teacher – 6th Grade

Mrs. Melanie Williams Teacher – 6th Grade



Mrs. Donna Durham Teacher – 5th Grade Literacy Lab

Mrs. Ronette Burnett Teacher – 6th Grade Literacy Lab

Mrs. Adrienne Cox Parent

Mrs. Patty Lott Parent

Mrs. Kathy DeWinter Parent

Mrs. Tracy Degracia Parent

Mr. Bob Jeswald Parent

Dr. Betty Dunlap Director of Federal Programs

Mrs. Vonda Phinazee Camp David Vision of Hope

Dr. Tawana D. Miller Consultant – Title I

Title I only (SWP 9, 14, 18)

The Letter of Intent for Title I Schoolwide was submitted on April 17, 2017. This plan was developed with parent stakeholder input for the 2017-2018 school year.

Please indicate the programs that are consolidated in this plan: _This plan includes no other consolidated funds, only Title I Part A._

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

School Designated as a Priority School __No__ (Yes or No) School Designated as a Focus School __No__ (Yes or No)



C. Needs Assessment/ Data Review Results (SWP 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17)

CREEKSIDE SCHOOL – Student Population and Economically Disadvantaged

School Name Student Subgroup %

Creekside School

White 74%

Creekside School Black 16%

Creekside School Hispanic 4%

Creekside School Two or more races 4%

Creekside School Asian 9%

Creekside School American Indian or Alaska Native

.01%

Creekside School

Economically Disadvantaged 41%



CREEKSIDE SCHOOL – 5th Grade Comprehensive Needs Assessment – 3-year profile

CCRPI COMPONENT 2014 2015 2016 3-yr Avg

District CCRPI Score 77.7 79.4 80.2 79.1000

State CCRPI Score 72.7 76 71.7 73.4667

School CCRPI Score 76.1 79 75.8 76.9667

Ind # 1. ACHIEVEMENT Pts (40) 51.2 33.4 34.4 39.6667

1 ELA (%) 94.7 67.4 54.9 72.3203

2 Reading (%) 98.1 NA 66.2 82.1400

2 Mathematics (%) 96.0 76.9 72.3 81.7417

3 Science (%) 86.2 70.1 71.7 76.0240

4 Social Studies (%) 84.1 61.5 65.1 70.2317

Achievement: Content Mastery Category Performance 0.9182 0.6899 0.6888 0.7656

Content Mastery Points Earned (out of 40) 36.72 27.597 27.526 30.6143

Content Mastery Weighted Performance 0.3672 0.276 0.2752 0.3061

5 Positive Movement for ELL's NA NA NA NA

6 SWD in Gen Ed ≥ 80% 93.5 80 65 79.5000

5th grade Writing Assessment 71 NA NA 71.0000

7 3rd graders with Lexile ≥ 650 NA NA NA NA

8 5th graders with Lexile ≥ 850 71 70.904 71.618 71.1740

9 ≥ 2 Career Assessment Lessons 100 100 100 100.0000

10 Student Attendance Rate 95.9 45.5 97.531 79.6437

Achievement: Post ES Readiness Category Performance 0.8780 0.8440 0.9290 0.8837

Post MS Readiness Points Earned (out of 40) 43.90 33.76 37.16 38.2737

Post MS Readiness Weighted Performance

0.2634 0.2532 0.2787 0.2651

11 % Pass 4 content and CRCT Meet or Exceed/ %Proficient or Distinguished Learner on GA.

Milestones EOG

76.1 46.319 44.947 55.7887

% Exceeds on CRCT 42.9 NA NA 42.9000

Achievement: Predictor for HS Category Performance 14.8000 4.6320 4.4950 7.9757



Predictor for HS Grad Points Earned (out of 10) 14.8 4.632 4.495 7.9757

Predictor for HS Grad Weighted Performance 0.222 0.1389 0.135 0.1653

2. PROGRESS Pts (40) 15.3 35.7 32.6 27.8667

Progress Pts Component Performance # Typ SGP/ Total SGP's

# Typ SGP/ Total SGP's


P ELA (%) 0.5318 0.6303 0.5651 0.5757

P Reading (%) 0.5714 NA NA 0.5714

P Mathematics (%) 0.6443 0.7553 0.662 0.6872

P Science (%) 0.6278 0.6697 0.6435 0.6470

P Social Studies (%) 0.6917 0.6757 0.6295 0.6656

3. ACHIEVEMENT GAP Pts (12) 7 5.8 6.7 6.5000

Achievement Gap Component Performance

Gap Size or Gap

Change/12

Gap Size or Gap

Change/12

Gap Size or Gap

Change/12

A ELA (%) 0.0833 0.0833 0.1666 0.1111

A Reading (%) 0.0833 NA NA 0.0833

A Mathematics (%) 0.1666 0.1666 0.1666 0.1666

A Science (%) 0.1666 0.1666 0.1666 0.1666

A Social Studies (%) 0.0833 0.1666 0.1666 0.1388

4. CHALLENGE Pts (ED/EL/SWD + ETB (up to 10)) 2.6 4.1 2.1 2.9333

ED/EL/SWD 1.6 3.6 1.1 2.1000

Exceeding the Bar 1 0.5 1 0.8333

5. School Climate Rating (up to 5 stars) 5 4 3 4.0000

Student Data Profile 2014 2015 2016 3-yr Avg.

Total Student Enrollment #DIV/0!

Student Attendance (%) 96.244 82.857 92.182 90.4277

Discipline Incidences 89.681 87.329 86.885 87.9650

On Grade Level Lexile (%) #DIV/0!

Above Grade Level Lexile Percentage #DIV/0!



Staff Data Profile 1 to 3 Years

4-10 Years 11-20 Years

21+ Years

Current Principal's # of Years in Position

Teaching Staff # of Years in Current School

Teaching Staff # of Years in Profession

2014 2015 2016 3-yr Avg

Administrator Attendance Rate 99.333 98.333 98.333 98.6663

Teacher Attendance Rate 95.916 95.595 96.407 95.9727

Staff Attendance Rate 96.829 95.488 96.337 96.2180

TKES Standards (%) Level I Level II Level III Level IV

1 Professional Knowledge

2 Instructional Planning

3 Instructional Strategies

4 Differentiated Instruction

5 Assessment Strategies

6 Assessment Uses

7 Positive Learning Environment

8 Academically Challenging Environment

9 Professionalism

10 Communication



CREEKSIDE SCHOOL – 6th Grade Comprehensive Needs Assessment – 3-year profile

CCRPI COMPONENT 2014 2015 2016 3-yr Avg.

District CCRPI Score 83.1 76.3 83.4 80.9333

State CCRPI Score 73.8 71.2 71.5 72.1667

School CCRPI Score 90.2 78.8 86.1 85.0333

Indicator # 1. ACHIEVEMENT Pts (40) 53.2 32.7 35.8 40.5667

1 ELA (%) 94.5 60.1 67.5 74.0173

NA Reading (%) 97.6 NA NA 97.6000

2 Mathematics (%) 94.0 70.7 80.6 81.7690

3 Science (%) 86.4 65.6 75.3 75.7773

4 Social Studies (%) 89.2 68.5 78.8 78.8083

Achievement: Content Mastery Category Performance 0.9234 0.6621 0.7554 0.7803

Content Mastery Points Earned (40) 36.96 26.484 30.218 31.2207

Content Mastery Weighted Performance 0.36936 0.264838 0.302 0.3121

5 Positive Movement for ELL's NA NA NA NA

6 SWD in Gen Ed ≥ 80% 88.1 76.471 63 75.7873

8th grade Writing Assessment NA NA NA NA

7 8th graders with Lexile ≥ 1050 NA NA NA NA

8 ≥ 2 Career Related Assessment/inventories

NA NA NA NA

9 Student Attendance Rate 96.6 54.846 56.443 69.2963

Achievement: Post ES Readiness Category Performance 0.7400 0.8530 0.8460 0.8130

Post MS Readiness Points Earned (out of 20) 7.40 17.06 16.92 13.7943

Post MS Readiness Weighted Performance

0.2220 0.2559 0.2538 0.2439

10 % Pass 4 content and CRCT Meet or Exceed/ % Proficient or Distinguished

Learner on GA. Milestones EOG

NA 4.414 5.364 4.8890

% Exceeds on CRCT 74.1 NA NA 74.1000

Achievement: Predictor for MS Category Performance 0.7400 0.4414 0.5364 0.5726



Predictor for MS Grad Points Earned (out of 20) 7.4 4.414 5.364 5.7260

Predictor for MS Grad Weighted Performance 0.222 0.13242 0.16092 0.1718

2. PROGRESS Pts (40) 18.2 37.6 40 31.9333

Progress Pts Component Performance # Typ SGP/ Total SGP's



P ELA (%) 0.5738 0.5809 0.6986 0.6178

P Reading (%) 0.6861 NA NA 0.6861

P Mathematics (%) 0.8123 0.7641 0.771 0.7825

P Science (%) 0.6721 0.6684 0.7507 0.6971

P Social Studies (%) 0.8877 0.7943 0.8406 0.8409

3. ACHIEVEMENT GAP Pts (12) 14 7.5 6.7 9.4000

Achievement Gap Component Performance

Gap Size or Gap

Change/15

Gap Size or Gap

Change/12

Gap Size or Gap

Change/12

A ELA (%) 0.2 0.1666 0.1666 0.1777

A Reading (%) 0.2 NA NA 0.2000

A Mathematics (%) 0.2 0.25 0.1666 0.2055

A Science (%) 0.1333 0.1666 0.1666 2.0000

A Social Studies (%) 0.2 0.1666 0.1666 0.1777

4. CHALLENGE Pts (ED/EL/SWD + ETB (up to 10)) 4.8 1 3.6 3.1333

ED/EL/SWD 4.3 1 3.6 2.9667

ETB 0.5 0 0 0.1667

5. School Climate Rating (up to 5 stars) 5 4 3 4.0000



Creekside School 2015 & 2016 Georgia Milestones – Content Mastery by Group – Highlighted Areas indicate performance flags

School Name

Grade Cluster

Reporting Category Assessment

Type Assessment Subject

2015 Proficiency

Rate

2016 Proficiency

Rate Gain/Loss

Creekside School

E ALL Students

EOG English Language Arts

67.361 66.18 -1.181

Creekside School

M ALL Students


60.1 67.452 7.352

Creekside School

E Asian/Pacific Islander


Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School

M Asian/Pacific Islander


Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School

E Black


50 44.34 -5.66

Creekside School

M Black


41.964 46.875 4.911

Creekside School

E Hispanic


79.412 81.25 1.838

Creekside School

M Hispanic


65.217 67.647 2.43

Creekside School

E American Indian/Alaskan


No Data Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School

M American Indian/Alaskan


No Data No Data NA

Creekside School

E White


63 69.792 6.792

Creekside School

M White


70.397 71.196 0.799

Creekside School

E Multi-Racial


50 55.882 5.882

Creekside School

M Multi-Racial


59.524 55.882 -3.642

Creekside School

E Students with Disability


25.926 33.333 7.407

Creekside School

M Students with Disability


40.426 38.235 -2.191



School Name

Grade Cluster

Reporting Category

Assessment Type

Assessment Subject

2015 Proficiency

Rate

2016 Proficiency

Rate

Gain/Loss

Creekside School

E English Learners



NA

Creekside School

M English Learners


Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School

E Economically Disadvantaged


47.581 50.342 2.761

Creekside School

M Economically Disadvantaged


40.942 45.6 4.658

Creekside School

E ALL Students

EOG Mathematics

76.944 72.281 -4.663

Creekside School

M ALL Students

EOG Mathematics

70.698 80.609 9.911

Creekside School


EOG Mathematics

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School


EOG Mathematics

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School

E Black

EOG Mathematics

53.571 48.113 -5.458

Creekside School

M Black

EOG Mathematics

63.333 66.667 3.334

Creekside School

E Hispanic

EOG Mathematics

65.217 93.75 28.533

Creekside School

M Hispanic

EOG Mathematics

76.471 82.353 5.882

Creekside School


EOG Mathematics


NA

Creekside School


EOG Mathematics

No Data No Data NA

Creekside School

E White

EOG Mathematics

79.603 76.042 -3.561

Creekside School

M White

EOG Mathematics

73.833 83.696 9.863

Creekside School

E Multi-Racial

EOG Mathematics

76.19 61.765 -14.425



School Name

Grade Cluster



2015 Proficiency

Rate

2016 Proficiency

Rate Gain/Loss

Creekside School

M Multi-Racial

EOG Mathematics

64.706 58.824 -5.882

Creekside School


EOG Mathematics

50 38.542 -11.458

Creekside School


EOG Mathematics

31.481 49.02 17.539

Creekside School

E English Learners

EOG Mathematics

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School

M English Learners

EOG Mathematics


NA

Creekside School


EOG Mathematics

54.348 58.904 4.556

Creekside School


EOG Mathematics

57.661 61.6 3.939

Creekside School

E ALL Students

EOG Science

70.139 71.733 1.594

Creekside School

M ALL Students

EOG Science

65.586 75.346 9.76

Creekside School


EOG Science

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School


EOG Science

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School

E Black

EOG Science

47.778 46.226 -1.552

Creekside School

M Black

EOG Science

43.75 44.792 1.042

Creekside School

E Hispanic

EOG Science

73.913 93.75 19.837

Creekside School

M Hispanic

EOG Science

76.471 79.412 2.941

Creekside School


EOG Science


NA

Creekside School


EOG Science

No Data No Data NA

Creekside School

E White

EOG Science

74.91 76.049 1.139



School Name

Grade Cluster



2015 Proficiency

Rate

2016 Proficiency

Rate Gain/Loss

Creekside School

M White

EOG Science

69.333 80.797 11.464

Creekside School

E Multi-Racial

EOG Science

47.059 55.882 8.823

Creekside School

M Multi-Racial

EOG Science

59.524 61.765 2.241

Creekside School


EOG Science

33.333 39.583 6.25

Creekside School


EOG Science

58.511 48.039 -10.472

Creekside School

E English Learners

EOG Science


NA

Creekside School

M English Learners

EOG Science

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School


EOG Science

49.597 56.164 6.567

Creekside School


EOG Science

42.391 49.6 7.209

Creekside School

E ALL Students

EOG Social Studies

68.454 65.067 -3.387

Creekside School

M ALL Students

EOG Social Studies

61.528 78.771 17.243

Creekside School


EOG Social Studies

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School


EOG Social Studies

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School

E Black

EOG Social Studies

49.107 39.623 -9.484

Creekside School

M Black

EOG Social Studies

46.667 53.261 6.594

Creekside School

E Hispanic

EOG Social Studies

73.913 96.875 22.962

Creekside School

M Hispanic

EOG Social Studies

67.647 94.118 26.471

Creekside School


EOG Social Studies


NA



School Name

Grade Cluster



2015 Proficiency

Rate

2016 Proficiency

Rate Gain/Loss

Creekside School


EOG Social Studies

No Data No Data NA

Creekside School

E White

EOG Social Studies

64.801 68.357 3.556

Creekside School

M White

EOG Social Studies

70.833 82.909 12.076

Creekside School

E Multi-Racial

EOG Social Studies

76.19 52.941 -23.249

Creekside School

M Multi-Racial

EOG Social Studies

44.118 58.824 14.706

Creekside School


EOG Social Studies

46.809 36.458 -10.351

Creekside School


EOG Social Studies

30.556 43.75 13.194

Creekside School

E English Learners

EOG Social Studies


NA

Creekside School

M English Learners

EOG Social Studies

Too Few Students

Too Few Students

NA

Creekside School


EOG Social Studies

47.101 48.973 1.872

Creekside School


EOG Social Studies

43.145 53.226 10.081



GaDOE CCRPI Scores (2016)



2016 Creekside School (Elementary)



2016 Creekside School (Middle)



GaDOE CCRPI Scores (2015)



2015 Creekside School (Elementary)



2015 Creekside School (Middle)



Creekside School CCRPI GA Milestones Analysis (2015-2016)



Comprehensive Needs Assessment (SW 1)

Data Review Summary “Root Cause Analysis”

Strengths Weaknesses Needs

(Highlight 3 Prioritized Needs)

Prioritized Needs

Achievement Data

• 5th grade showed growth

from 2015-2016 in Science

and Social Studies

• 5th grade Hispanic students

met Participation Rate, State

Performance Target, and

Subgroup Performance

Target in all core content

areas for 2015 and 2016

• 6th grade students showed

growth from 2015-2016 in all

core content areas

• 6th grade Hispanic students

met Participation Rate, State

Performance Target, and

Subgroup Performance

Target in all core content

areas for 2015 and 2016

• 44.97% of 5th grade students and 53.65% of6th

grade students scored at Proficient or

Distinguished Learner on the 2016 GA

Milestones EOGs

• 34% of 5th grade students and 33% of 6th grade

students did not score at Developing Learner or

Above on GA Milestones ELA EOG in 2016



Above on GA Milestones Math EOG in 2016



Above on GA Milestones Science EOG in 2016



Above on GA Milestones Social Studies EOG

in 2016

• 29% of 5th grade students did not achieve a

Lexile measure equal to or greater than 850 on

the GA Milestones ELA EOC in 2016

• 5th grade students ELA and Math GA

Milestones EOGs have declined from 2015-

2016

• Address ELA and writing areas

of concern for 5th and 6th grade

students

• Address Math areas of concerns

for 5th and 6th grade students

• Address Science and Social

Studies areas of concern for 5th

and 6th grade students

Root Causes

1) Additional teacher Professional

Development (PD) needed in Georgia

Standards of Excellence and the

CCRPI

2) Additional teacher PD needed on 5th

and 6th grade ELA Reading and

Vocabulary, and Writing and

Language

3) Additional teacher PD needed in 5th

grade Math Operations and Algebraic

Thinking, Numbers and Operations,

and 6th grade Math Ratios and

Proportional Relationships,

Expressions and Equations

4) Additional teacher PD needed in

Science and Social Studies

5) Additional teacher PD needed in

Differentiated Instruction

Prioritized Need 1:

Increase student achievement in

English Language Arts &

Writing in grades 5-6.

Prioritized Need 2:


Math in grades 5-6.

Prioritized Need 3:


Science and Social Studies in

grades 5-6.



Perception Data • School received a 4 star

CCRPI climate rating in

2015

• All teachers are highly

qualified. Two teachers are

National Board Certified

and 100% are In-Tech

certified

• Schoolwide student

attendance is 92%

• Increase CCRPI climate rating to 5 star in

2017

• Increase periodic parent surveys about school

environment, student learning and parent-

child relationship

• Increase weekly newsletters about core

content classroom activities

• Provide a parent resource center to create a

wealth of current information

Observation Data ▪ TKES data indicates that

most teachers received Level

III ratings in: 1.

Positive Learning Environ.

2. Professional Knowledge

▪ Focus Walks indicate that

100% of teachers have

standards posted and lessons

are aligned with the Georgia

Standards of Excellence

▪ TKES data indicates that Level II ratings

identified were in:

1. Academically challenging environment and

differentiation



Needs Assessment/ Data Review Results

(SWP 1, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17)

Prioritized Needs Data Source Participants Involved Communication to Parents and

Stakeholders

• Reading/ELA challenges in grades 5-6

• GA Milestones 2015 and 2016

• CCRPI Report 2015 and 2016

• District Pre/Post Tests

• GRASP Fluency and

Comprehension Screener

• STAR Reading

• End of Unit Tests / 9 week exams

• Principal/leadership team

• Teachers

• Parent Coordinator

• Parents

• Georgia Dpt. Of Ed. – CCRPI Reports

• School website

• Report Cards

• Teacher/Parent Conferences

• PTA Meetings

• Math challenges in grades 5-6






• Teachers


• Parents

• Science challenges in grade 5-6 • Social Studies challenges in grades 5-6






• Teachers


• Parents



D. SMART GOAL #1 (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-Based, and Time-Bound)

(SW 2, 6, 8, 9)

Smart Goal #1 (ELA/Reading): For the 2017-2018 school year, 5thgrade students will increase from 66% to 85% on the GA Milestones ELA assessment.

For the 2017-2018 school year, 6th grade students will increase from 67% to 85% on the GA Milestones ELA assessment.

Georgia School Performance

Standard

Student

group

(All or

subgroup)

Action /Strategies

(Include description of SWP 2, 7, 9, 10)

Evaluation of Implementation

and Impact on Student

Learning

Monitoring Actions of

Implementation

Estimated Cost,

Funding Source,

and/or

Resources (SWP 9) Artifacts Evidence

Curriculum Standard 2: Designs

curriculum documents and aligns resources

with the intended rigor of the required standards

Assessment Standard 2: Uses a balanced

system of assessments including diagnostic, formative, and summative to monitor

learning and inform instruction

Assessment Standard 4: Implements a process to collaboratively analyze

assessment results to adjust instruction

Instruction Standard 3: Establishes and

communicates clear learning targets and

success criteria aligned to curriculum standards

Instruction Standard 4: Uses research-

based instructional practices that positively impact student learning

Instruction Standard 5: Differentiates

instruction to meet specific learning needs of students

Instruction Standard 6: Uses appropriate, current technology to enhance learning

Professional Learning Standard 1: Aligns

professional learning with needs identified through analysis of a variety of data

Professional Learning Standard 5:

Allocates resources and establishes systems to support and sustain effective PD

ALL

• Implement enhanced GSE-focused reading

assessments and instructional units

• Implement school-wide Read and Guided

Reading to improve student mastery of state

standards

• Implement Writing Roadmap – incorporate

prewriting activities using Thinking Maps

• Implement after school tutorial to help

students improve in reading/writing

• Acquire new technology (Chrome Books)

and orchestrate Google learning classroom

• Acquire instructional materials and resources

to support core content learning initiatives

(GA Milestones student workbooks, manipulatives, paper, pencils, pens,

notebooks)

• Provide parent workshops in ELA with a

focus on reading comprehension/fluency

• Acquire 800 Parent/Student/Teacher STEM

books/ instructional resources with an

emphasis on Math and Science and College

and Career Readiness

• Provide Professional Development to

teachers in Guided Reading, Google Classrooms and Chromebooks, Guided

Reading, Georgia Standards of Excellence,

STEM, Writing Roadmaps, Differentiated Instruction and Project Based Learning

Lesson plans,

observations,

sign-in sheets, agendas,

technology

reports

School Leaders

Demonstrate: Initiate and sustain change to increase

staff performance

and student learning

Teachers

Demonstrate: Clear learning

targets and success criteria aligned to

curriculum

standards

Students

Demonstrate: Ability to work

independently and

in teams to solve real-world

problems that

require advanced effort, decision

making, and

creative thinking

At/Above

standards on GA Milestones

Title I Director provides

guidance and oversees Title I

cross-functional monitoring of

program - Technical School Visits

- Plan/Budget Analysis - Professional Development and

Guidance

Principal and AP - Admin TKES walkthroughs

and formative assessments - Admin Informal Observations

- District Level Observations

and Reports

-

Teachers - Observations - Grade Level Meetings

- TKES

Title I Budget

Computers

(Chromebooks)

$36,000

Instructional

Materials $15,500

After school, tutorial $1,000

Parent Workshops

$2,000

Parent Resource Materials

$15,000



SMART GOAL #2 (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Results-Based, and Time-Bound)

(SW 2, 6, 8, 9)

Smart Goal #2 (Math): For the 2017-2018 school year, 5th grade students will increase from 72% to 85% on the GA Milestones Math assessment.

For the 2017-2018 school year, 6th grade students will increase from 81% to 95% on the GA Milestones Math assessment.


Standard

Student

group

(All or

subgroup)

Action /Strategies




Learning


Implementation

Estimated Cost,

Funding Source,

and/or






















ALL

• Implement enhanced GSE-focused math

assessments and instructional units

• Acquire math software for 5thand 6th grade

usage


students improve in math (numbers and

operations, expressions and equations, and geometry





(GA Milestones math student workbooks, manipulatives, paper, pencils, pens,

notebooks)

• Provide parent workshops in math with a

focus on numbers and operations, expressions and equations, and geometry


books/instructional resources with an

emphasis on Math and Science and College and Career Readiness


teachers in Google Classrooms and

Chromebooks, Georgia Standards of Excellence, STEM, Differentiated Instruction

and Project Based Learning

Lesson plans,

observations,


technology

reports

School Leaders


staff performance


Teachers



curriculum

standards

Students


independently and


problems that


making, and

creative thinking

At/Above







Guidance




and Reports -


- TKES

Title I Budget

Computer Software

$7,000

See above for initial estimated costs




(SW 2, 6, 8, 9)

Smart Goal #3 (Science): For the 2017-2018 school year, 5th grade students will increase from 72% to 85% on the Georgia Milestones Science EOG assessment.

For the 2017-2018 school year, 6th grade students will increase from 75% to 90% on the Georgia Milestones Science EOG assessment.


Standard

Student

group

(All or

subgroup)

Action /Strategies




Learning


Implementation

Estimated Cost,

Funding Source,

and/or


Curriculum Standard 2: Designs curriculum documents and aligns resources

with the intended rigor of the required

standards






Instruction Standard 3: Establishes and communicates clear learning targets and

success criteria aligned to curriculum

standards





Instruction Standard 6: Uses appropriate,

current technology to enhance learning





ALL

• Implement GSE standards-based writing

strategies to improve Informative,

Expository, and Persuasive writing, content

related text, and lab reflections into instructional Science units

• Utilize balanced assessments to evaluate

students’ prior/post knowledge and to

measure conceptual growth as relates to Science units


students improve in Science (Earth, Physical,

Life, Anatomy and Geology)





(GA Milestones Science student workbooks)


books with an emphasis on Math and Science and College and Career Readiness



Chromebooks, Georgia Standards of Excellence, STEM, Differentiated Instruction

and Project Based Learning

Lesson plans, observations,

sign-in sheets,

agendas, technology

reports

School Leaders

Demonstrate: Initiate and sustain

change to increase staff performance

and student

learning

Teachers


targets and success

criteria aligned to

curriculum

standards

Students


independently and


problems that


making, and

creative thinking

At/Above






- Plan/Budget Analysis

- Professional Development and Guidance


and formative assessments

- Admin Informal Observations


and Reports -


- TKES

Title I Budget

Personnel Costs per available budget

Personnel – 2 CSR [class size reduction]

teachers in core

content areas - TBD $136,000 ($68,000@)




(SW 2, 6, 8, 9)

Smart Goal #4 (Social Studies): For the 2017-2018 school year, 5th grade students will increase from 65% to 85% on Georgia Milestones Social Studies EOG assessment.

For the 2017-2018 school year, 6th grade students will increase from 78% to 90% on Georgia Milestones Social Studies EOG assessment.


Standard

Student

group

(All or

subgroup)

Action /Strategies




Learning


Implementation

Estimated Cost,

Funding Source,

and/or






















ALL

• Implement GSE standards-based instruction

• Utilize balanced assessments to evaluate

students’ prior/post knowledge and to measure conceptual growth as relates to

Social Studies units


students improve in Social Studies for 5th and 6th grade





(GA Milestones Science student workbooks)



Chromebooks, Georgia Standards of

Excellence, Differentiated Instruction and Project Based Learning

• New Connections Class - Computer Literacy

Class in 5th grade using an interdisciplinary

instructional approach.

Lesson plans,

observations,


technology

reports

School Leaders


staff performance


Teachers



curriculum

standards

Students


independently and


problems that


making, and

creative thinking

At/Above







Guidance




and Reports

-


- TKES

Title I Budget

Personnel Costs per

available budget



E. Professional Learning Plan to Support School Improvement Plan

(SW 3)

Professional Learning

Strategy to support

achievement of SMART

Goals

Professional

Learning Timeline

Estimated Cost,

Funding Source,

and/or Resources

Person(s)

Responsible

Monitoring Teacher

Implementation of

Professional

Learning

Artifacts/Evidence of

Impact on Student

Learning

• Corruption, Fraud, Waste, and

Abuse

• Title I Personnel

responsibilities and duties (if

applicable). To include

personnel who may be

providing a Title I

before/after/Saturday/Summer

school program

• Title I inventory procedures (if

applicable)

• Title I Complaint Process

Preplanning in

August 2017

$0

Title I Director

provides guidance

to Principal and

Principal trains

staff

Title I Office Monitoring

Agenda, Sign in Sheet, Handouts,

Investigation Report

5th and 6th grade Teachers

participate in Georgia Standards of

Excellence professional

development for all core content

areas

Ongoing

August 2017-May 2018

$0

Principal, AP, and

Teachers

Principal & Teachers

Agenda, Sign-in Sheets, Handouts

STAR Reading

District Benchmarks / 9 wk. exams

GRASP Fluency/Comprehension


participate in PD for differentiated

instruction, balanced assessments,

and Depth of Knowledge

Ongoing


$0

Principal, AP, and

Teachers

Principal & AP


STAR Reading / IXL

District Benchmarks



End of Unit Tests / 9 wk. exams


participate in STEM Professional

Development

Ongoing


$0

Principal, AP, and

Teachers

Career Education

Specialist

Principal & AP

Career Education

Specialist


IXL / Moby Max



participate in Google classroom

and Chromebook technology

Professional Development

Ongoing


$0

Principal, AP, and

Teachers

Principal & AP


STAR Reading / IXL

District Benchmarks


5th grade Teachers participate in

Guided Reading through Content

Professional Development

November 2017-May

2018

$0

Principal, AP, and

Teachers

Curriculum Support

Teacher and Principal


STAR Reading

Write To Learn reports


participate in Math PD provided by

school district


$0

Math Coach

Math Coach, Curriculum

Support Teacher, Assistant

Principal, Principal


STAR Math Results



participate in Science and Social

Studies PD provided by school

district


$0

Math Coach

Math Coach, Curriculum

Support Teacher, Assistant

Principal, Principal


District Benchmarks




G. Parent Engagement and Communication

(SW 4)

Parent Engagement

Activities

Timeline Estimated

Cost, Funding

Source,

and/or

Resources

Person(s)

Responsible

Evaluation

Results

Artifacts/Evidence of Impact on

Student Learning

Parent Involvement Policy

Family and Community Engagement

Standard #2: Establishes partnerships

and decision making processes that build

capacity for family engagement in the success of students


Standard #5: Collaborates about

available school interventions as well as

support strategies that can be used at home to enhance academic achievement

Revised and

submitted for

approval with FY18 (new)

GADOE checklist

by September 15, 2017

Distributed by October 15, 2017

Ongoing distribution

throughout the

year for new,

incoming students

– should be

documented

Utilize onsite

personnel to assist in

building parent capacity (parent

involvement plan/

revision, compact, parent workshops/

meetings) to help

improve student achievement

Principal

Parent Liaison

Staff Parents

Education Checklist (new

template for FY18)

(Met, Did Not Meet, N/A) Must include a parent

feedback and suggestion

option at the end which must have a question or

request for revisions to the

PIP’s content (This is separate from the input

meeting feedback form.)

Parent survey including questions which are

relevant to content

included in the PIP

Summary of survey results

Parent Input Meetings Agenda

Feedback forms

Minutes Evidence of feedback form availability (website screenshot,

email invitation, photo of hardcopies available in the front

office/PRC)

Evidence of Distribution (2 or more):

School website (screenshot) with an active link to the PIP Sent home (bookbag), photos

Signed and dated teacher dissemination statement indicating

the PIP was sent home with each student “All Teachers/Staff” email requesting they send home the

PIP with students

Email with parent distribution list indicating PIP attached

Available at school for pickup (photos)

School Messenger w/ Script, notifying parents when and how

PIPs will be sent home and/or where to pick up a copy if not received.

Parent Resource Center visitors log indicating parent

notification pick-up Annual Title I Meeting (entire packet) indicating PIP

distribution as handout at the meeting

Compact



and decision making processes that build capacity for family engagement in the

success of students



available school interventions as well as support strategies that can be used at

home to enhance academic achievement

Revised/Approved

by Sept. 15, 2017

100% compacts

collected by Oct. 15, 2017

$0

Principal

Parent Liaison

Staff Parents

Students (K-5)

Georgia Department of

Education Checklist (new

for FY18) (Met, Did Not Meet, N/A)

Parent survey including questions which are

relevant to content

included in the compact

Summary of survey results

Staff Input Meetings:

Grade level collaboration to establish target learning goals

Agenda/Sign-In Sheets Meeting Minutes

Student input (5th-6th grade)

Parent input meeting invitations (minimum of 2 different

modes) Parent Input Meetings

Agenda

Feedback forms Minutes



Evidence of feedback form availability (website screenshot,

email invitation, photo of hardcopies available in the front office/PRC)

Evidence of Distribution (2 or more): Returned signature page signed and dated by parent and

teacher

School website (screenshot) with an active link to the compact

Sign-in sheets/invitations and documentation that compacts

were used in parent-teacher conferences Signed and dated teacher dissemination statement indicating

the compact was sent home with each student

Email with parent distribution list indicating compact attached

Available at school for pickup (photos)

School Messenger w/ Script, notifying parents when and how compacts will be sent home and/or where to pick up a copy if

not received.

Parent Resource Center visitors log indicating parent

Title I Parent Input Meeting and 1%

Title I Annual Meeting


Standard #2: Establishes partnerships and decision making processes that build

capacity for family engagement in the

success of students


Standard #5: Collaborates about available school interventions as well as

support strategies that can be used at

home to enhance academic achievement

April-May 2017

August 31, 2017

$0

$0

Principal Parent Liaison

Staff Parents

Georgia Department of Education Checklists for

compact and PIP (Met, Did Not Meet, N/A)

Minimum of 2 different all-parent invitations

School website (required) Flyer, Marquee, School Messenger

Refer to agenda, minutes and feedback form templates

provided by Title I (parent liaison and portal)

Annual Title I Meeting is the only title allowed. Refer to

GADOE and FCS Title I templates (parent liaison/portal)

Agenda

Sign-in sheets

Minutes PowerPoint

Min. 2 all-parent invitations

Distribution evidence of compact and PIP

If Priority/Focus School, inform of FLP

U.S. mailed letter

Student Assessment & Results Parent

Meeting

(SW 10, 11, 12, 13)

Throughout the

school year

$0

Parent Liaison

Teachers

Assistant Principal

Title I Parent

Workshops/Meetings

evaluations

School-parent compact

Parent-Teacher conferences (required for elementary schools)

Parent workshops

Annual Title I Meeting

Transition Meetings

(Preschool Programs)

(SW 6)

Throughout the

year and at least

once per semester August 2017-May

2018

$0

Parent Liaison

Teachers Counselor

Agenda

Sign-in sheets (for incoming parents) Presentation (PowerPoint)

Handouts



May 12, 2017 –

rising 6th graders

Parent Resource Center


Varies depending on 1%

Parent Coordinator Principal

Feedback from Parent Input Meeting Photos

Flier with hours/days of operation

Open House (flier) Parent event calendar/schedule

Visitor log

Computer usage/materials check-out log Other evidence of a PRC

Monthly Title I Parent

Meetings/Family Nights



and decision making processes that build

capacity for family engagement in the success of students



available school interventions as well as

support strategies that can be used at home to enhance academic achievement

September 2017 –

May 2018

Sept. 2017 Oct. 2017

Dec. 2017

Jan. 2018 Feb. 2018

Mar. 2018

Parent Resource Area

Materials for

Checkout

$15,000

Parent Workshops

$2,000

Principal

Parent Liaisons

Teachers

Title I Parent

Workshops/Meetings

evaluations

School Parental Involvement Plan

Compact

Parent calendar of events Documentation packet for each: agenda, sign-in sheets,

evaluation, handouts, presentation

Examples

Family connections cohort

Literacy/Math Nights/events Building parent/staff capacity

Core content

Understanding State academic standards and assessments



H. Highly Qualified Staff

(SW 3, 5)

All courses are taught by highly qualified staff. ___YES____ (Yes or No)

If no, explain:

List efforts to recruit highly qualified teachers to your school.

• Use website to promote school initiatives and culture and climate

• Provide school based principal mentorship to newly arriving teachers

• Utilize social media such as Facebook and Twitter to promote school highlights and accolades

• Utilize current staff to recruit highly qualified teachers

I. GaDOE Title I Components

Comprehensive Needs Assessment of the entire school, (including taking into account the needs of migratory children as defined in Section 1309

(1) that is based on information which includes the achievement of children in relation to the state academic content standards and the state

student academic achievement standards described in Section 1111(b)(1).

Response

We have considered the needs of migrant children by following these procedures:

• All new students receive an Occupational Survey form, as well as the registration form. This will be checked and verified by the registrar.

• We will work closely with our counselor, school social worker, and our central office liaison to ensure that the student’s needs are met for any students

identified.

• Providing intervention programs and additional assistance for any migrant student who might be identified and is experiencing academic deficiencies.

• Students will be considered for additional services based on formative data and classroom assessments.

• Students who may be homeless will be referred to the Harris County Schools Homeless Liaison for possible services. Creekside will provide services as

required for any homeless students.

Currently, there are no Migrant students attending our school.

There are no Neglected and Delinquent students currently enrolled at the school.



Student Transition Plan

Response

• Creekside has an open-door policy for local parents and students to visit classes at anytime

• Creekside holds two days of elementary school visitation. This allows rising 5th grade students an opportunity to listen to a presentation about

the school hosted by a teacher. Students take part in a Question and Answer session followed by a guided tour of the building. A parent night is

organized annually to introduce parents to Creekside and answer any questions they may have.

• Creekside implements 7th grade transition by taking 6th graders to HCCMS (middle school). This occurs over a 4-day period. The students are

taken on a guided tour of the school and are then given a presentation on key points and information about the middle school experience.

Students are then allowed to ask questions about the academic programs available at the middle school along with the sports programs and

academic eligibility and expectations. A 6th grade parent night allows parents to tour the school and ask questions about the middle school

programs.

Any Additional Funds/Carryover

Response

The plan for utilizing any additional funds is as follows:

• Acquisition of instructional supplies (GA Milestones ELA/Math student workbooks, math manipulatives)

• Technology related supplies (headphones and adapters)

• Chromebooks and computers

• Parental involvement resource center supplies for parent workshops



J. Comprehensive Needs Assessment

Resources

Georgia School Performance Standards – http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/School-Improvement-Services/Pages/default.aspx

Professional Learning Plan Template Guidelines -http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/School-Improvement-

Services/Documents/Professional%20Learning/Learning%20Forward%20Professional%20Learning%20Plan%20Template.pdf

System for Effective School Instruction:http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/School-Improvement-

Services/Documents/System%20for%20Effective%20School%20Instruction/System%20for%20Effective%20School%20Instruction.pdf

Title 1- http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/Federal-Programs/Pages/default.aspx

QCIS (Indistar) -http://www.indistar.org/

Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) -http://www.gadoe.org/Technology-Services/SLDS/Pages/SLDS.aspx

Source Document

Data Sources: Achievement Data: Perception Data: Observation Data:

Georgia Milestones TKES Surveys TKES Data

SLDS – Georgia Milestones, Student Growth Title I Parent Survey Content Walkthroughs (if applicable)

CCRPI Title I Teacher Survey

SLOs Title I Student Survey

Promotion/Retention Data Climate Survey

Lexile Scores Professional Learning Survey

Local School Data Local School Perception Data

Subgroup Data

Attendance Data

Discipline Data

http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/School-Improvement-Services/Pages/default.aspx

http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/School-Improvement-Services/Documents/Professional%20Learning/Learning%20Forward%20Professional%20Learning%20Plan%20Template.pdf

http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/School-Improvement-Services/Documents/Professional%20Learning/Learning%20Forward%20Professional%20Learning%20Plan%20Template.pdf

http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/School-Improvement-Services/Documents/System%20for%20Effective%20School%20Instruction/System%20for%20Effective%20School%20Instruction.pdf

http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/School-Improvement-Services/Documents/System%20for%20Effective%20School%20Instruction/System%20for%20Effective%20School%20Instruction.pdf

http://www.gadoe.org/School-Improvement/Federal-Programs/Pages/default.aspx

http://www.indistar.org/

http://www.gadoe.org/Technology-Services/SLDS/Pages/SLDS.aspx

CREEKSIDE SCHOOL FY2017-18 · Mrs. Kathy DeWinter Parent Mrs. Tracy Degracia Parent Mr. Bob Jeswald...

Documents

Transcript of CREEKSIDE SCHOOL FY2017-18 · Mrs. Kathy DeWinter Parent Mrs. Tracy Degracia Parent Mr. Bob Jeswald...