Creativity for Learning 5: Linking theory and practice through collaborative inquiry
-
Upload
chrissi-nerantzi -
Category
Education
-
view
494 -
download
0
Transcript of Creativity for Learning 5: Linking theory and practice through collaborative inquiry
with Chrissi Nerantzi @chrissinerantzi
Creativity for Learning and FLEX artwork by artist Ellie Livermore
Workshops info • workshop 1 (29.1.15, 1-4pm, AS105): Unit overview, introduction to creativity in HE, enablers and
barriers
• workshop 2 (5.2.15, 1-4pm Manchester City Centre): Creativity in action! Let’s play the “Sell your bargains” game, where game-based learning meets problem-based learning
• workshop 3 (12.2.15, 1-4pm, AS 105): The use of story for learning and teaching
• workshop 4 (19.2.15, 1-4pm, AS105): Learning through making and LEGO® Serious Play®
• workshop 5 (5.3.15, 1-4pm), AS105: Linking theory and practice through creative collaborative inquiry
• BONUS: automatically join the Greenhouse, monthly gatherings with showcase events Creative Spaces
• Next term: – action learning sets (peer support) – Face-to-face and online tutor support – 17 June showcase your innovations at the Greenhouse and BSE pre-conference event, – here on campus, more info to follow – CELT Summer Conference
theory and practical application, activities and development of creative practices
pre-workshop tasks
1. Look back at your idea for an innovation and identify a clear focus.
2. Familiarise yourself with action research. Study Action Research for Professional Development.
3. Have a look at some other innovative pedagogic projects in your discipline/professional area. What do they have in common?
Please read!
"In the varied topography of professional practice, there is a high, hard ground
overlooking a swamp. On the high ground, manageable problems lend themselves to
solution though the application of research-based theory and technique. In the
swampy lowland, messy, confusing problems defy technical solution. The irony of this
situation is that the problem of the high ground tend to be relatively unimportant to
individuals or society at large, however great their technical interest may be, while in
the swamp lie the problems of greatest human concern. The practitioner must choose.
Shall he remain on the high ground where he can solve relatively unimportant
problems according to prevailing standards of rigor, or shall he descend to the swamp
of important problems and non rigorous inquiry?“ (Schön, 1987, 3)
messy learning in the studio using a World Cafe approach:
3 zones of explorative activities
• self-organised and self-determined learning in small groups
• learning through social interactions and co-construction of ideas and knowledge
• emphasis on process but also creating an output that can be shared
• initial leads, self-selected groups, but whole groups rotate after 40 minutes
http://www.theworldcafe.com/
Principles
• Set the context
• Create hospitable space
• Explore questions that matter
• Encourage everyone’s contribution
• Connect diverse perspectives
• Listen together for patterns and insights
• Share collective discoveries
http://www.theworldcafe.com/principles.html
• In flow (Csikszentmihaly)
• Zone of Proximal Development (Vygotsky)
• Anything else you find related to the above
• Kerry (initial lead)
In flow (Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi)
http://indiedevstories.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/flow-channel1.png
Zone of Proximal Development (Vygotsky, 1978)
panic alert
panic
alert
comfy
Where are you as a learner? Where are you as a teacher?
• Four stages of learning (Maslow)
• Learning power (Claxton) http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09585170701445947#.VNPGt9KsVIE
• Anything else you find related the above
Marcin (initial lead)
4 stages of learning (Maslow)
• you know what you know
• you don’t have to think what you are doing
• you know what you don’t know
• you don’t know what you don’t know
unconscious incompetence
conscious incompetence
conscious competence
unconscious competence
con
scio
us
com
pet
ence
lear
nin
g m
atri
x
htt
p:/
/ww
w.b
usi
nes
sbal
ls.c
om
/co
nsc
iou
sco
mp
eten
cele
arn
ingm
od
el.h
tm
5th s
tage
: R
efle
ctiv
e C
om
pet
ence
4 stages of learning Unconscious incompetence - This basically means that you
don't know what you don't know.
Conscious incompetence - This is where the learner is aware
that s/he does not know something or can learn something new.
Put more plainly, you realize that you are not as expert as perhaps
you thought.
Conscious competence - This is where you have to think about a
task or exercise in order to complete it correctly.
Unconscious competence - Eventually you reach a point where
you no longer have to think about what you are doing in order to
complete it correctly. True experts often do things very well without
thinking about it.
the 7 dimensions of learning power (Claxton)
stre
ngt
h
Changing and Learning
Meaning Making
Critical Curiosity
Creativity
Learning Relationships
Strategic Awareness
Resilience
wea
knes
s Being Stuck and Static
Data Accumulation
Passivity
Being Rule Bound
Isolation & Dependence
Being Robotic
Fragility & Dependence
facilitating/inhibiting learner centredness
faci
litat
ing Belief & professional
vision
positive classroom culture
collaborative teaching
positive relationships
professional dialogue & choice
golden moments
being empowered as a professional
inh
ibit
ing Covering the curriculum
results and targets
performance management
workload
large numbers of students
policing practice
large numbers of classes in week
lack of time
lack of know how
• Action research (Lewin)
• Case study research (Stake)
• Anything else you find related the above
• Helena (initial lead)
Action Learning
“Action Learning is a continuous process of learning and reflection, supported by colleagues, with an intention of getting things done. Through action learning individuals learn with and from each other by working on real problems and reflecting on their own experiences. The process helps us to take an active stance towards life and helps to overcome the tendency to think, feel and be passive towards the pressures of life. (McGill and Beaty, 2001)
experiential learning cycle (Kolb, 1984)
concrete experience
reflective observation
abstract conceptualisation
active experimentation
How? Reflective Cycle (Gibbs, 1988)
25
1. Description
What happened?
2. Feelings
What were you thinking and feeling?
3. Evaluation
What was good and bad
about the experience?
4. Analysis
What sense can you make
of the situation?
5. Conclusion
What else could you
have done?
6. Action plan
If it arose again, what
would you do?
deepening reflection describing
feeling
analysing
reasoning
stepping back
being self-critical
exploring options
linking to action
own perspective
link to theory
colleagues
students
Brookfield Critical Lenses Critical reflection: “... the process by which we research the assumptions informing our own practice by viewing these through four complementary lenses – the lenses of our students’ eyes, colleagues’ perceptions, literature and our own autobiography. [...] Finally, we can review our personal autobiographies as learners so that we can make visceral connections to, and gain a better understanding of, the pleasures and terrors our own students are experiencing.” (Brookfield, 2006, 26)
Action Research Sets • learning in a small group • sharing and supporting
reflection • peer support and challenge • action planning • everybody works on their
own project • regular meetings to
reflect/discuss/challenge and plan further actions
• collaboration as learning/focus is the process of learning
• agree working practices at the outset
Action Learning Cycle source: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/id291_action_learning.pdf
Project ideas (action learning set activity)
Individually:
• Brainstorming create a mindmap/use sticky notes to put a plan together
• What is the vision?
• How will you get there?
• How will you know that it has worked? What is your evaluation strategy?
Together:
• Share, discuss and challenge. What are your actions?
post-workshop extensions
• Reflect on what we did and identify how some of it links to your innovation project
• Start putting some thoughts together in your portfolio
• Think about development, implementation and evaluation of your innovation
• What is your plan? • Working closely with your action learning set
over the next few months! Organise regular meetings. Update and invite me to some of them.
Timeline
• March: First action learning set meetings, to discuss innovation projects
• April: Report progress and seek help (development) (tutorial: 16 April, All Saints 105, 1-4pm – David and Helena, academic posters workshop)
• May: Update and share work (implementation) (tutorial: 14 May, All Saints 105, 1-4pm)
• June: Complete evaluation and develop poster (tutorial: 18 June, All Saints 105, 1-4pm)
• 15 July: Present posters at the CELT Conference
Action research sets
• Helena, Najibeh, David
• Kerry, Emma, Susan
• Marcin, Haleh, Olivia, Ellie
Our first little collaborative writing project
We agreed to all write a little something, well 300 words in response to the following statement as contributed by Kerry and agreed by all ;)
Playing with ideas in HE Our contributions will be for the next Creative Academic Magazine and also become open data to write this up
as a paper. Perhaps Kerry, could lead with somebody on this, as it was her idea?
References • Beaty, L. (2003) Action Learning, Continuing Professional Development Series No.
1, York: Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN), available at https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/id291_action_learning.pdf
• Brookfield, S. D. (2006) The Skilful Teacher (2nd edition) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Gibbs, G., 1998. Learning by Doing: A Guide to Teaching and Learning. London:
FEU. • Kolb D A (1984) Experiential Learning, Prentice Hall, New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs. • McGill, I. and Beaty, L. (2001) Action Learning. London: Kogan Page.(3rd ed.) • Nash, R. (2004) Liberating Scholarly Writing. The Power of Personal Narrative, New
York: Teachers College Press. • Schön, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. • Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological
Processes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
with Chrissi Nerantzi @chrissinerantzi
Creativity for Learning and FLEX artwork by artist Ellie Livermore
https://p2pu.org/en/courses/2615/creativity-for-learning-in-higher-education/
This workshop/course counts towards FLEX, which is a personalised and practice-based CPD programme with formal and informal pathways and enables you to get recognition via the FLEX award for your CPD activities, work towards up to 30 credits of the PgCert/MA in Academic Practice and help in preparation for an application for professional recognition with the HEA. FLEX activities need to have a focus on learning and teaching. To find out more about FLEX and how to submit your claim, please visit FLEX at http://www.celt.mmu.ac.uk/flex/ or on Twitter using the hashtag #flexcpd FLEX lead Chrissi Nerantzi at [email protected]
practice-based CPD