CPS Energy’s Generation Strategy...jobs have been committed to San Antonio by our NEE partners....
Transcript of CPS Energy’s Generation Strategy...jobs have been committed to San Antonio by our NEE partners....
1
CPS Energy’s Generation Strategy
Todd HorsmanSr. Director, Strategy & Product Development
Kim R. Stoker Sr. Director, Environmental & Sustainability
January 17, 2017
2
CPS ENERGY: BY THE NUMBERS
786K339K
AA+Largest municipally-owned electric and gas Utility in US
Electric and Gas Customers
Premier credit rating
$11B in assets $2.5B in annual revenue
Solar leader in Texas;Tenth in the nation.
Annual economic impact to San Antonio community
More than 1,000 new jobs have been committed to San Antonio by our NEE partners.
New Energy Economy Partnerships
#1 786K339K
AA+
$11B$2.5B #1
$1.4BEconomic Impact
>900Jobs
VISION 2020
Vision 2020 transitions CPS Energy from a company that is highly dependent on traditional generation power sources to a company that provides competitively priced power based
on a diverse generation portfolio.
3
20% renewable energy capacity in power generation mix
65% of generation low-carbon
20% renewable energy capacity in power generation mix
Diversification
4
Fuel and Technology Diversification - Installed Capacity
1970
Gas/steam
1980
Gas/steam Coal
1990
Gas/Steam Coal Nuc
2015
Gas Coal Nuc STEP Wind/Landfill Gas Solar
1648 MW
3338 MW
3930 MW 8056 MW
Gas-Steam 100%
Gas-Steam 75.1%
Coal 24.9%
Gas-Steam 61.1%
Nuclear 17.8%
Coal 21.1%
Gas-Steam 41%
Coal 27%
Nuclear 13%
STEP 3.7%
Wind/LandfillGas 13% Solar 1.7%
Generation Mix
2010
Coal & Nuclear Renewables & Gas
2015
Coal & Nuclear Renewables & Gas
5
Nuclear 33.2%Coal 48.9%
Renewables and Gas
Nuclear 29.6%Coal 29.2%
Renewables and Gas
41.2%
82.1% 58.2%Gas 26.3%Wind 11.1%Solar 1.1%
17.9%
HOW WE GOT HERE
6
Nuclear 33.2%Coal 48.9%
Nuclear 29.6%Coal 29.2%
82.1% 58.2%Gas 26.3%Wind 11.1%Solar 1.1%
17.9%
Innovative Strategic Approach
– Actively managing risk through diversification of generation sources
– Reducing carbon intensity / transitioning to a cleaner fleet
– Pursuing affordable renewables, supported by more flexible & dynamic traditional thermal fleet
– Leveraging clean energy development & energy efficiency initiatives to create economic opportunity in San Antonio
Our actions have included:
• Early deactivation of coal (Deely 1 & 2) & use of ultra-low sulfur coal
• Purchase of an 800MW Natural Gas Combined Cycle (Rio Nogales)
• Deployment of 500MW of Solar & 1059 MW of Wind
• Innovative & strong local rooftop solar market (~50 MW)
• STEP 771 MW - Demand Response & Energy Efficiency
“CPS Energy’s strategic goals and decisions are among the most progressive in the country. It is shooting for 20 percent renewable energy generation capacity by 2020 and has plans to mothball one of its 1970s-era coal plants in 2018, 15 years earlier than expected.” -Jim Marsten, Founding Director of the Texas office of Environmental Defense Fund (EDF)
CPS ENERGY IS #1 IN SOLAR FOR TEXAS
7
Somerset Solar Farm - Southeast San Antonio
WIND IS A LARGE PART OF GENERATION MIX
8
Desert Sky Wind Farm - Iraan, TX Pecos County
9
Solara 110 MW
Pearl 50 MW (Under Construction)
Sirius 110 MW(In Testing)
Helios 95 MWEclipse 40 MW
DIVERSITY IN OUR RENEWABLES
Sinkin 1&2 20 MW
Somerset 11 MW
Alamo 1 40 MW
Alamo 24.4 MW
Alamo 3 5.5 MW
Blue Wing14 MWSweetwater 3 &4
341 MW
Desert Sky 1&2 161 MW
Cedro Hill 150 MW
Los Vientos 200 MW
Penascal 77 MW
Papalote Creek 130 MW-Wind Farms
-Solar Farms
Legend:
• Electric vehicle charging network
OPTIONS, CHOICES & CONVENIENCE FOR OUR CUSTOMERS
• Residential and commercial energy efficiency
• Home Manager
• Smart Thermostat
10
• SolarHost SA
• Roofless Solar
• Weatherization Program
• Nest• Energy Hub• Honeywell• Weather Bug
DEMAND RESPONSEEQUIVALENT TO A SMALL POWER PLANT
11
96105
137
172
201 196
0
50
100
150
200
250
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
MW
14% of customers are on DR program
~125,000 customers on demand response programs
CPS ENERGY CO2 INTENSITY
12
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
198
0
198
1
198
2
198
3
198
4
198
5
198
6
198
7
198
8
198
9
199
0
199
1
199
2
199
3
199
4
199
5
199
6
199
7
199
8
199
9
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
201
3
201
4
201
5
CO
2 In
ten
sit
y (
lbs/m
wh
)
To
tal G
en
era
tio
n (
millio
n m
wh
)
time
Historical CO2
Intensity for CPS Energy (lbs of CO2
emissions per net mwh of generation from all sources of
power including gas, coal, wind, and nuclear)
Total Generation CO2 Intensity
1988- STP 1 & 2 added to Generation mix
1993- STP shutdown for year
2005- Increase STP from 28% to 40% ownership
2009 - Increase due to Spruce 2
WE ARE CLOSE TO MEETING GOAL OF 65% LOWER CARBON EMISSIONS
13
AA+
Sources: 2016 Annual Report & January 2016 Gen Mix Report, YTD – January, & M&V reports through CY 2016
Source: 2016 Annual Report, January 2016 Gen Mix Report, YTD – January, & M&V reports through CY 2016
Total Carbon-Free GenerationTotal Generation
15
Nuclear25.8%
STEP2.7%
Wind9.9% Solar
1.0%
Landfill Gas0.3%
Gas23.3%
Purch Pwr12.0%
Coal25.1%
Nuclear65.4%
STEP6.9%
Wind 25.1%
Solar2.6%
INTELLIGENCE & AUTOMATION OF GRID
• Community Benefits:• Economic growth
• Enhanced reliability
• Maintain competitive rates
1414
15
STRONG VALUE PROPOSITION FOR GRID 2.0
FUTURE STATE
Automating processes
Better data and decision making
New products & services
Accelerated customer response & problem resolution
• 13M miles driven annually
• 103K miles walked annually
• 4.1M calls answered annually
• Old processes
CURRENT STATE
BATTERY STORAGE PROJECT
16
Solar
5 MW Solar PV Facility
Battery Energy Storage System
10 MW-1hr Battery or
5 MW-2hr Battery
Will reduce the emissions of pollutants through Solar Shifting in addition to providing Ancillary Services in the ERCOT market.
TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION PILOTS
17
CPS Energy Microgrid• Partners: JBSA, UTSA, Omnetric,
Duke Energy• Location: Fort Sam Houston Library• Purpose:
• Microgrid can isolate from the grid for resiliency and back-up purposes
• The lessons learned from this pilot will allow for future installations throughout the service territory increasing the robustness of the utility grid
Photovoltaic system paired with a 75kW battery system
CUMULATIVE HISTORICAL WATER SAVINGS
18
Water saved
CPS STEP (2005-2015) 5,842
CPS Renewables (2015) 40,410
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
acre
-fee
t
CPS STEP (2005-2015)
CPS Renewables (2015)
19
ANNUAL WATER SAVINGS
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
STEP (Energy Efficiency) - - - 1 41 91 216 385 496 595 770 917 1,09 1,23 1,08 1,26 1,42 1,62 1,75
Renewables 581 622 656 789 1,45 2,02 2,50 2,67 3,81 4,82 4,45 5,36 5,72 4,92 6,62 7,19 7,11 7,21 7,16
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Wat
er
Save
d (
acre
-fe
et/
year
)
Water Saved Due to Renewables & Energy Efficiency
20
COMBINED NOX + SO2 RATE RANKING
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
77
4
75
4
73
4
71
4
69
4
67
4
65
4
63
4
61
4
59
4
57
4
55
4
53
4
51
4
49
4
47
4
45
4
43
4
41
4
39
4
37
4
35
4
33
4
31
4
29
4
27
4
25
4
23
4
21
4
19
4
17
4
15
4
13
4
11
4
94
74
54
34
14
Com
bin
ed E
mis
sio
n R
ate
of N
Ox p
lus S
O2
(lb/M
MBTU
)
Numerical Ranking of Units - Worst to Best
Generating Unit Emission Rates - 2015Combined NOx plus SO2 (lb/MMBTU)
744 Operating Coal Units Reporting Emissions in
Deely 1 ranked #475 ( 64% in nation)Deely 2 ranked #453 ( 58% in nation)Spruce 1 ranked #144 ( 19% in nation)Spruce 2 ranked #1
U.S Average Emission Rate = 0.7517
Deely Unit 2 = 0.5908 lb/MMBTU
All CPS Energy Units Combined = 0.3589 lb/MMBTU (Top 35% in
Nation)
Spruce 1=0.1868 lb/MMBTU
Spruce 2=0.0518 lb/MMBTU
Deely Unit 1 = 0.6061 lb/MMBTU
NOX REDUCTION
21
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
CPS Energy Total Nitrogen Oxide
(NOx) Emissions (tons/year)
NOx total tons
CPS Energy has
reduced NOx
Emissions by over
78% since 1997
PARTICULATE MATTER REDUCTION
22
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1997 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
PM
em
iss
ion
s (
ton
s)
year
CPS Energy Coal Unit Particulate Matter
(PM) Emissions
JTD1&2 PM (tons) JKS1 PM (tons) JKS2 PM (tons)
Reduction due to replacing
JTD1&2 Electrostatic
Precipitators with more
SO2 REDUCTION
23
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
CPS Energy Total Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
Emissions (tons/year)
SO2 total tons
2012 Reduction due to
use of ULS coal at Deely
QUESTIONS?
24
Photo courtesy of OCI Solar