CPO Fitrep ObservationsCDR Kevin Robinson

1

Purpose/Method

• Slides that follow are a combination of a NPC slideshow given to C.O.’s and observations of personnel with previous enlisted board experience.

• Slides with have the NPC logo are the standard slides from PERS-3• RED font comments are additional observations

• Slides with no logos have been added to provide observation or recommendations.

General Comments• Most C.O.’s do not understand the CPO/SCPO/MCPO selection board process.• As a result, key information and is often missing.• While the opening and closing statements are as important as in officer fitreps, the old

adage that the “stuff in between is just fluff” is not true regarding enlisted evals.– Significant time is spent reading these words– What you say and HOW YOU QUANTIFY can have significant impact

• At the SCPO/MCPO level, it is assumed they are technical experts. – What sets selectees apart at this level is leadership within the mess, command-wide impact on Sailors, and

willingness to step up and assume responsibility outside one’s rating

• General and flowery comments are a waste of precious lines in the comments section– “I pray to King Neptune every day to thank him for sending me this sea granite.” ??????????– “A strong player within the mess.” (How so? What does he do in there?)

• Talking about the ship’s accomplishments without directly tying it to the member’s contribution to the accomplishments is a waste of space

• Stop blaming the “constraints of the fitrep system” on where you break someone out– Exceptions are in small-number groups

• Soft breakouts on 1 of 1 fitreps are important, especially on transfer fitreps• Read the precept from past boards to understand and reinforce this info

4

•Precept–Convening order to the board President–Provides approved membership –Number of quotas per rate –Defines selection standard

Selection considerations and guidance

CPO/SCPO/MCPO BOARD

5

CPOSCPO/MCPO BOARD

• Selection standard– Best and fully qualified definition

First Line Leadership Education/Personal and Professional Development Competency/Skill Information

o Rating knowledge-impact to mission successo Teachingo Communication skillso Contributions to division/departmental achievements

Special Duty Assignmento Instructor dutyo Recruit dutyo RDCo Detailer

Anti-Terrorism and Force Protection Language, Regional Expertise and Culture Experience Navy Special Warfare Experience

6

•Board Membership setup in panels–Approximately 20 panels for record review:

1 - O-5 (and a LDO/CWO on large panels)3-10 - Master ChiefsRelated Ratings and Special Qualifications Where Possible

Admin Panel Surf Hull/Eng PanelAviation Panel Intel/Crypto PanelAviation Maintenance Panel Seabee PanelAvionics Panel Spec War Panel IT Panel Supply PanelEngineering Panel Surf Deck/Ops

PanelHealth Care Panel Weapons PanelNuc Sub Panel Surface ET PanelSurface Tactics Panel Fwd Sub Panel

CPO BOARD

7

Active Duty FY-09 Selection Percentages

Boards Eligible Selected Percent

MCPO 3,097 353 11.40

SCPO 12,568 1356 10.79

CPO 19,738 4,021 20.37

CPO/SCPO/MCPO BOARD

8

CPO BOARD

(1) Score Sheets Graded

•Two panel members score

•Scores are averaged

•Differential set point

–Third member reviews

(2) Slate Created

•Panel “rack and stack” eligibles

–Rank by score

•Sanity check

–Eligibles close to the quota cut off

(3) Tanking

•Panel presents slate to the board–By rating

•Board membership confirm/ not confirm panel recommendation

•Slate gender neutral with candidates not identified

Grading

1. Generic score sheets are developed for the board overall and modified for specific ratings.

- In general, these modifications take into account rating-specific nuances- All rating sheets are briefed to the Board President and Board Sponsor for approval- Maximum points for an area cannot change, just how you determine those points for a

specific rating

2. After the two members score the records and all records are numerically stacked, a “crunch line” is established

- All members above the crunch line are now reviewed by the whole– panel to determine the select/non-select slate- Personnel can move up/down within this period

3. What you write and how you quantify it is significant for two reasons:- Good quantification gets the candidate into the crunch- Well-written articulation can be significant as the panel does the final ranking/selecting

10

CPO BOARD

• Score Sheet used for grading (precept)– Performance Eval

Promotion recommendation Performance mark relative to summary group Leadership/Sailorization Narrative/performance documented/achievement Accept responsibilities/collateral duties

– Career History Operational vs. Non-Operational (Sea-Shore) Arduous duty or command deployments – IA, Unit deployment Special qualifications

– Awards (more points in current pay grade)– Education– Community involvement– Adverse information (NJP, PFA or missed quals)– Potential Subjective

Approx. 65% total score

Tie-breakers

11

CPO BOARD

– Other considerations and factorsCollateral Duties (esp. command-wide w/mission

impact)o 3M Coordinatoro PRT Coordinatoro Urinalysis Coordinatoro Professional Development Board

Overseas and Arduous DutyIndividual Augmentation (IA)

o Superior performance, even if outside of normal career path.

Leadership in Diverse Organizations

Important Information

• Collateral duties - While challenging and creates some churn within the command, recommend laying out a plan for command collateral duties and cycling people through. The Sailor who is the PRT Coordinator one year, UAC the next year, and AEWS Coordinator the third year has shown a willingness to branch out and take risk more so that the 3 year PRT Coordinator

• Being a member of a board has little impact, unless the significance of the membership can be quantiifed• Bad – “Active member of the Career Development Board”• Good – “Hand selected by the CMDCM and myself to be on one of only three Chiefs (out of 18) to be a

permanent member of all CDBs.”• What is their leadership impact within the mess?

• “Leader within the mess” says nothing• “Volunteered as Committee Chairman for 2009 CPO Transition. Smooth, well-run process which has

strengthened my mess.” tells the board a lot more• IA -

• Not enough to just go on an IA. Documented performance AND not lowering a person’s ranking status are important.

• The C.O. who takes the time to talk about the positive impact of a member on an IA is noticed• Example –” Despite the need for Chief Jones within this command, he volunteered for a tough

assignment in Iraq. His feedback on the IA mobilization process has been instrumental in making the transition for 3 other personnel who have also been assigned to IAs”

• GET THEIR AWARDS FOR THE IA TO THE BOARD

13

CPO BOARD Scoring the Eligible

• Evals document performance

– Promotion Recommendation (Hard and soft breakouts) Consistent? Improving? Declining? One of one versus competitive peer group

• Duties– Job scope, leadership and level of responsibility

Including collateral duties (Leads Peers?)– Impact of position on command mission– Difficult/Arduous Duty? Increased responsibilities?– Mentoring-positive impact on retention and Sailor growth– Rating knowledge-impact on command

• Narrative – Does write-up support marks and promotion recommendation?

Accomplishments to results (quantitative) o Contributions to unit mission and morale o Retention and advancement results

Scoring the Eligible• Leadership –

• Quantifying impact is the key– Bad – “Through his efforts this DDG has received the Golden Anchor Award for the past two

years”– Good – “ Through his direct engagement as Chairman of all CDBs, 9 of 10 Sailors have met PTS

requirements, 7 of 8 (88%) E-5s were advanced to E-6 (Flt Avg 30%), and 4 of 6 (66%) E-6’s were advanced to CPO (Flt Avg 33%).

• Documented perfomance – Remember that technical ability at the SCPO/MCPO level should be a given.

• The PROMOTABLE of 15 who “has my strongest recommendation for advancement to MCPO” has sent a mixed signal to the board and appears to be written for the member, not the board

• Accepts responsibilites/collateral duties – • Training teams within one’s rating are expected and don’t break someone out• Command-wide (or large department-wide) duties and how they are quantified do break

someone out and are key– Good – “As Command DAPA for this 274 person crew, there has been a 74% decrease in alcohol-

related incidents during this reporting period”– No good – “As a member of the STT, was instrumental in the successful completion of all ATG

events and ISIC NAVCERT

15

CPO BOARD • Professional Maturity and Experience

– History of assignments (normal sea/shore rotation)– Diversity of duty (FFG, CVN, LHA, Forward Deployed)– Out of rate assignments

• Warfare Qualifications– Warfare designators can be attained, it is a requirement to qualify

• Special Qualifications– NAC, MTS, ATS, EOOW, or CSOW

• Awards– Personal awards in current pay grade carries more weight

• Education - Schools, Courses, etc– Advanced degree– Professional Military Education (“A” school, NECs)

16

RECOMMENDATION FOR PROMOTION QUIZ?!?!

PromotionRecommendation

NOBSignificantProblems

Progressing PromotableMust

PromoteEarly

Promote42.INDIVIDUAL X43.SUMMARY 0 0 0 0 2 0

PromotionRecommendation

NOBSignificantProblems

Progressing PromotableMust

PromoteEarly

Promote42.INDIVIDUAL X43.SUMMARY 0 0 0 0 1 1

OR??

17

RECOMMENDATION FOR PROMOTION QUIZ?!?!

Promotion Recommendation

NOB Significant Problems

Progressing Promotable Must

Promote Early

Promote 42. INDIVIDUAL

X

43. SUMMARY 0 0 0 0 1 0

Promotion Recommendation

NOB Significant Problems

Progressing Promotable Must

Promote Early

Promote 42. INDIVIDUAL

X 43. SUMMARY 0 0 0 0 0 1

OR??

Good bye kiss

18

WRITTEN COMMENTS (BLOCK 41)

Opening:“Read as an EP, ranked against the XO.”

“My top JO ranked against Department Heads.” “First report as CDR”

“My first report on this outstanding officer”“Ranked 2 of 10 hand picked active duty officers.”

Closing: “He has my strongest endorsement and recommendation

for major command. In addition, he has earned my strongest possible recommendation for accelerated promotion to captain now.”

19

WRITTEN COMMENTS (Block 41)

“Read this carefully…the rules force me to make him only a Must Promote. He is an Early Promote! He is rated against another O-X who I anticipate will be promoted. Joe’s turn is next. Joe would truly be number one in any other setting.”

20

SAMPLE EVAL Layout

*** #1 of 20 OUTSTANDING FIRST CLASS PETTY OFFICERS**** He has my strongest possible recommendation for promotion to CPO or selection for LDO. **NEVERSAIL Sailor of Year for 2008**-PROFESSIONAL MANAGER & LEADER. Planned and executed an aggressive work load for Repair Division during NEVERSAIL limited availability. Through his efforts the division completed 300 work requests, including the installation of 21 reducing/relief isolation valves and the replacement of #2 CHT pump.-EXCEPTIONAL TRAINER. Hand picked as a DCTT member, he provided training and oversight to 40 Sailors in two repair lockers. His dedication significantly contributed to NEVERSAIL Battle E and Red DC awards.-STAND-OUT MENTOR. Dedicated numerous hours in providing sound counsel and guidance to junior personnel, promoting professional growth and development. Under his supervision his division achieved a 80 percent increase in retention and a 90 percent increase in advancement rates.

BATTLE PROVEN LEADER already performing at the level of a CPO. PROMOTE NOW!

21

SAMPLE EVAL

#1 of 20 outstanding first class petty officers. Neversail Sailor of Year for 2008Planned and executed an aggressive work load for Repair Division during NEVERSAIL limited availability. Through his efforts the division completed 300 work requests, including the installation of 21 reducing/relief isolation valves and the replacement of #2 CHT pump. Hand picked as a DCTT member, he provided training and oversight to 40 Sailors in two repair lockers. His dedication significantly contributed to NEVERSAIL Battle E and Red DC awards. Dedicated numerous hours in providing sound counsel and guidance to junior personnel, promoting professional growth and development. Under his supervision his division achieved a 80 percent increase in retention and a 90 percent increase in advancement rates. Battle proven leader already performing at the level of a CPO. promote now! He has my strongest possible recommendation for promotion to CPO or selection for LDO.

22

SAMPLE BULLETS

TACTICALLY ADEPT. Qualified as AAWC, normally a CPO or officer position. As a member of CSTT/STT, he helped qualify 3 AICs and 2 CIC watch teams, developed complex combat systems scenarios and increased PQS accomplishment from 40% to 90% in five months.

EXCEPTIONAL ADMINISTRATOR. As OPS department 3M assistant, he managed 7 work centers and accomplished 100% RAR and 95% SAR during the most recent 3M certification.

CONSUMATE LEADER. Repair 5 locker leader, received the highest grade from ATG instructors of all repair lockers onboard. Provided expert training and guidance to 70 Sailors, resulting in 100% mission readiness.

OUTSTANDING LEADER. Petty Officer Smith had a major role in training 5 POs and 24 Seaman ensuring the success of NEVERSAIL’s ARQ, SARCERT, ULTRA-C and UNREP and earning personal recognition from ATGLANT and PAC, NAVSEA and CSD-1.

COMMAND WIDE IMPACT. An active member of FPTT, his aggressive attitude was a critical element in NEVERSAIL certifying as self-assess capable in FP early. As line coach, he trained and qualified over 100 Sailors.

UNLIMITED POTENTIAL TO EXCEL. Has my complete trust in all areas. Most strongly recommended for IMMEDIATE SELECTION to Chief Petty Officer!

23

SAMPLE BULLETS

OUTSTANDING OS. Qualified as AAWC, normally a CPO or officer position. ATG recognize OS1 Smith for outstanding performance during the ship’s recent no notice ATG Training Assessment. Because of his performance during a difficult deployment, he earned my complete trust. I want him on watch regardless of the tactical situation.

COMMITTED TEACHER. As a member of CSTT/STT, he developed complex combat systems scenarios that qualified 3 AICs and 2 CIC watch teams while increasing PQS accomplishment from 40% to 90% in five months.

EXCEPTIONAL SUPERVISOR. As OPS department 3M assistant, he managed 7 work centers and accomplished 100% RAR and 95% SAR during the most recent 3M certification.

24

SAMPLE BULLETS

OUTSTANDING LEADER. Petty Officer Smith had a major role in training 5 POs and 24 Seaman ensuring the success of NEVERSAIL’s ARQ, SARCERT, ULTRA-C and UNREP and earning personal recognition from ATGLANT and PAC, NAVSEA and CSD-1.

COMMAND INVOLVEMENT. Revitalized and streamlined an aggressive ESWS program that lead to over 60% of XXXXX junior Sailors earning quals.

SAILOR’S ADVOCATE. Responsible for a 90 percent divisional retention rate; the driving force behind 10 Sailors advancements and one Command Advancement selectee.

SUPERB TECHNICIAN. Repaired two major SHF equipment casualties during “XXXXXX”

correcting 40% loss in communications capability.

25

SUMMARY-NARRATIVE

• Use headers, Caps and white space• Summary Group vs. RSCA• Accomplishments-mission impact

– Leadership, technical, mentoring/teaching, communication, teamwork or potentialTraining Team (i. e. DCTT) impact

• Major collateral duties– 3M Coordinator, PRT Coordinator, Urinalysis

Coordinator, Professional Development Board

• Community Involvement– Demonstrates leadership

Recommended Layout for SCPOs/MCPOs NUMBER 1 OF 4 SCPO’S IN THIS COMMAND

FROM CMDCM - - “MY GO-TO CPO WITHIN THE MESS WHO CLEARLY OUT-PERFORMS ALL OTHERS”

LEADERSHIP. Through his direct engagement as Chairman of all CDBs, 9 of 10 Sailors have met PTS requirements, 7 of 8 (88%) E-5 were advanced to E-6 (Flt Avg 30%), and 4 of 6 (66%) E-6’s were advanced to CPO (Flt Avg 33%).OUTSTANDING OS. Qualified as AAWC, normally an officer position. As a member of CSTT/STT, he was the key to qualifying 3 AICs and 2 CIC watch teams, developed complex combat systems scenarios and increased PQS accomplishment from 40% to 90% in five months. My best AAWC, he is the General Quarters AAWC because I trust him most to fight the ship if needed.EXCEPTIONAL SUPERVISOR. As OPS department 3M assistant, he managed 7 work centers and accomplished 100% RAR And 95% SAR during the most recent 3M certification. Department achieved certification during initial assessment.COMMITTED MENTOR. Has taken on the role as mentor to seven Chief Petty Officers who had previously been struggling. As a result, Engineering Department was able to certify EOC at ULTRA-E, freeing up 6 weeks of training time from a tight schedule. Hand selected by the CMDCM and myself to be on one of only three Chiefs (out of 18) to be a permanent member of all CDBs.MISSION FOCUSED. Volunteered as Command PRT Coordinator. Reduced PRT failures from 14% to 3% in 6 six months.

UNLIMITED POTENTIAL TO EXCEL. Has my complete trust in all areas. Most strongly recommended for IMMEDIATE SELECTION To Master Chief Petty Officer and Command Senior Chief/CMDCM Programs!