Coyotes in North Carolina...coyotes released to chase with hounds. Coyote Distribution: Mid-1980s ....
Transcript of Coyotes in North Carolina...coyotes released to chase with hounds. Coyote Distribution: Mid-1980s ....
Coyotes in North CarolinaTITLE
History, Distribution, and Status
North American Coyote Distribution: Prior to European Settlement
North American Coyote Distribution:Current
Coyotes in North Carolina
Description
Typically 25-40 pounds
Variation in color
NC Coyotes: Prior to 1983
•1938: Gaston
•1947: Swain
•1955: Johnston
•1970: Wake
•1977: Surry
•1978: Surry Ne
wH
an
ov
er
Onslow
Carteret
Craven
Pamlico
Beaufort
Hyde
Dare
Northampton
Hertford
Ch
ow
an
Perq
uim
ans
Cam
den
Pasq
uotan
k
Curritu
ck
Granville
Durham
Alam
ance
Montgomery
Richmond
Scotland`
Cleveland
Mecklenburg
McDowell
Mitchell
Transylvania
Henderson 1938
1947
1970
19551975
19771978
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Caswell
Catawba Chatham
Cherokee
Clay
Columbus
Cumberland
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Hoke
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison Martin
Moore
Nash
Orange
Pender
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Stanly
StokesSurry
Swain
Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
GreeneJohnston
Wilson
Coyotes Spread across the Southeast
•Louisiana: late 1940s
•Arkansas: 1960s
•East of the Mississippi River•1970s through 1980s•Expedited by merging local populations from
coyotes released to chase with hounds
Coyote Distribution: Mid-1980s
Coyotes in NC: Post-1983
•Collection of reliable reports & specimens helped track coyotes in North Carolina
•Populations first established in eastern part of state obviously from illegal translocations
•1988–1990: First natural migration into western counties
•After 1996: All populations merged together
Coyote Occurrences1983 – 1985
Ne
wH
an
ov
er
Onslow
Carteret
Craven
Pamlico
Beaufort
Hyde
Dare
Northampton
Hertford
Ch
ow
an
Perq
uim
ans
Cam
den
Pasq
uotan
k
Curritu
ck
Granville
Durham
Alam
ance
Montgomery
Richmond
Scotland`
Cleveland
Mecklenburg
McDowell
Mitchell
Transylvania
Henderson
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Caswell
Catawba Chatham
Cherokee
Clay
Columbus
Cumberland
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Hoke
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison Martin
Moore
Nash
Orange
Pender
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Stanly
StokesSurry
Swain
Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
GreeneJohnston
Wilson
Coyote Occurrences1988
Ne
wH
an
ov
er
Onslow
Carteret
Craven
Pamlico
Beaufort
Hyde
Dare
Northampton
Hertford
Ch
ow
an
Perq
uim
ans
Cam
den
Pasq
uotan
k
Curritu
ck
Granville
Durham
Alam
ance
Montgomery
Richmond
Scotland`
Cleveland
Mecklenburg
McDowell
Mitchell
Transylvania
Henderson
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Caswell
Catawba Chatham
Cherokee
Clay
Columbus
Cumberland
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Hoke
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison Martin
Moore
Nash
Orange
Pender
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Stanly
StokesSurry
Swain
Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
GreeneJohnston
Wilson
Coyote Occurrences1990
Ne
wH
an
ov
er
Onslow
Carteret
Craven
Pamlico
Beaufort
Hyde
Dare
Northampton
Hertford
Ch
ow
an
Perq
uim
ans
Cam
den
Pasq
uotan
k
Curritu
ck
Granville
Durham
Alam
ance
Montgomery
Richmond
Scotland`
Cleveland
Mecklenburg
McDowell
Mitchell
Transylvania
Henderson
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Caswell
Catawba Chatham
Cherokee
Clay
Columbus
Cumberland
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Hoke
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison Martin
Moore
Nash
Orange
Pender
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Stanly
StokesSurry
Swain
Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
GreeneJohnston
Wilson
Coyote Occurrences 1996
Ne
wH
an
ov
er
Onslow
Carteret
Craven
Pamlico
Beaufort
Hyde
Dare
Northampton
Hertford
Ch
ow
an
Perq
uim
ans
Cam
den
Pasq
uotan
k
Curritu
ck
Granville
Durham
Alam
ance
Montgomery
Richmond
Scotland`
Cleveland
Mecklenburg
McDowell
Mitchell
Transylvania
Henderson
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Caswell
Catawba Chatham
Cherokee
Clay
Columbus
Cumberland
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Hoke
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison Martin
Moore
Nash
Orange
Pender
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Stanly
StokesSurry
Swain
Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
GreeneJohnston
Wilson
Coyote Occurrences2000
Ne
wH
an
ov
er
Onslow
Carteret
Craven
Pamlico
Beaufort
Hyde
Dare
Northampton
Hertford
Ch
ow
an
Perq
uim
ans
Cam
den
Pasq
uotan
k
Curritu
ck
Granville
Durham
Alam
ance
Montgomery
Richmond
Scotland`
Cleveland
Mecklenburg
McDowell
Mitchell
Transylvania
Henderson
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Caswell
Catawba Chatham
Cherokee
Clay
Columbus
Cumberland
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Hoke
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison Martin
Moore
Nash
Orange
Pender
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Stanly
StokesSurry
Swain
Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
GreeneJohnston
Wilson
Coyote Occurrences2003
Ne
wH
an
ov
er
Onslow
Carteret
Craven
Pamlico
Beaufort
Hyde
Dare
Northampton
Hertford
Ch
ow
an
Perq
uim
ans
Cam
den
Pasq
uotan
k
Curritu
ck
Granville
Durham
Alam
ance
Montgomery
Richmond
Scotland`
Cleveland
Mecklenburg
McDowell
Mitchell
Transylvania
Henderson
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Caswell
Catawba Chatham
Cherokee
Clay
Columbus
Cumberland
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Hoke
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison Martin
Moore
Nash
Orange
Pender
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Stanly
StokesSurry
Swain
Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
GreeneJohnston
Wilson
Coyote Occurrences2005
Ne
wH
an
ov
er
Onslow
Carteret
Craven
Pamlico
Beaufort
Hyde
Dare
Northampton
Hertford
Ch
ow
an
Perq
uim
ans
Cam
den
Pasq
uotan
k
Curritu
ck
Granville
Durham
Alam
ance
Montgomery
Richmond
Scotland`
Cleveland
Mecklenburg
McDowell
Mitchell
Transylvania
Henderson
Alexander
Alleghany
Anson
Ashe
Avery
Bertie
Bladen
Brunswick
Buncombe
Burke
Cabarrus
Caldwell
Caswell
Catawba Chatham
Cherokee
Clay
Columbus
Cumberland
Davidson
Davie
Duplin
Edgecombe
Forsyth
Franklin
Gaston
Gates
Graham
Greene
Guilford
Halifax
Harnett
Haywood
Hoke
Iredell
Jackson
Johnston
Jones
Lee
Lenoir
Lincoln
Macon
Madison Martin
Moore
Nash
Orange
Pender
Person
Pitt
Polk
Randolph
Robeson
Rockingham
Rowan
Rutherford
Sampson
Stanly
StokesSurry
Swain
Tyrrell
Union
Vance
Wake
Warren
Washington
Watauga
Wayne
Wilkes
Wilson
Yadkin
Yancey
GreeneJohnston
Wilson
Estimated Coyote Harvest by Method
19,422
36,144 36,041
31,662
27,152
34,972
43,507
133
325
593 567
847
1,434
1,747
2,091
2,843
3,458
3,8583,975
4,196
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
Har
vest
by
Trap
pin
g
Har
vest
by
Hu
nti
ng
Hunter harvest Trapper Harvest
Average Coyote Harvest by Method
3.4
4.54.2
4.7
5.6
6.46.6
7.27
7.6
7.1
8.1
1
1.471.11 1.23
1.04 1.021.23
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15
# o
f C
oyo
tes
Har
vest
ed
Average Harvest per Trapper Average Harvest per Hunter
Adaptability
•Habitat
•Food Habits
•Behavior
Credit: NC Travel & Tourism
Diet estimates of coyotes
Albermarle Peninsula Diets (scats)
Diet Item Percent Occurrence
Small rodents 32.7%
Rabbits 29.7%
White-tailed deer 24.8%
Other mammals 7.9%
Vegetation 3.0%
Other 2.0%
Fort Bragg Diets (scats)
Diet Item Percent Occurrence
Soft mast 40.7%
Insects 21.4%
White-tailed deer 8.0%
Small rodents 7.6%
Trash 5.9%
Rabbits 5.3%
Coyote Dispersal
Ft. Bragg Coyote Study
Credit: Morgan Elfelt, North Carolina State University
Coyotes in Urban Areas
Credit: Joseph Hinton (LSU)
Adaptability to Mortality1. Vehicle 2. Disease 3. Harvest
Litter sizes Pup survival rates# yearlings breeding
High Mortality
Low Mortality
Increased competition
Decreased competition
Litter sizes Pup survival rates # yearlings breeding
Coyote Interactions in NC
Coyote-Wildlife Interactions
•Impacts are likely to be minimal to beneficial overall
•Ecological Role
Coyote-Wildlife Interactions
•Coyotes may have impacts if prey populations are low due to other factors• Unlikely as coyotes switch to whatever is most abundant
• This seems to hold true for deer
•Red foxes are probably the only species that could be adversely impacted by coyotes
Coyote-Human Interactions
•Various concerns associated with coyotes:•Diseases•Depredation•Human Safety
Rabies(1990-2015)
Raccoon, 7150
Skunk, 1569
Fox, 1251
Cat, 416
Dog, 128
Bat, 626
Other, 208 OTHER (208)
64-COW
58-BOBCAT
34-EQUINE
14-COYOTE
10-GOAT
9-GROUNDHOG
6-BEAVER
4-DEER
3-RABBIT
3-OPOSSUM
1-FERRET
1-OTTER
Urban Coyote-Human Interactions
•Conflicts:•Attracted to unsecure food
• Pets• Pet food• Bird seed• Garbage
•Begin to associate humans with food
•Will adapt to living among people where they are not harassed• Attacks are rare; no unprovoked attacks in NC
Rural Coyote-Human Interactions
•Depredation a concern with livestock
•Predation (all species) accounts for:• 39% of all sheep and
goat losses (nationally)• 5.5% of all cattle losses
(nationally)
Rural Coyote-Human Interactions
• Livestock Damage:• Pre-2000: Dogs blamed• Post-2000: Coyotes blamed• Reality: Both responsible• Not all coyotes kill livestock
•Unconfined & unprotected livestock vulnerable
•Husbandry practices important
Tools for Preventing/Resolving Conflicts
Non-lethal:1. Education2. Tolerance3. Modifying Human Behavior
• Removal of attractant
• Leashing dogs
• Cats indoor
• Husbandry practices
Lethal
Eradication?•To cause and maintain population decline:
• Remove 70% annually• Coyotes will return
Not possible or needed
Bounties•They don’t work
•Target <5% of coyote population
•Paying people who are already catching coyotes
•Rampant fraud• Coyotes “grow wheels” (out-of-state & out-of-county)• Can buy parts/pieces online
•Cost 10s of thousands
•Don’t target the problem animals• Many states have tried, all have failed
Managing Coyotes is Important
•Must use integrated approach
•Population management ≠ damage management
You can help us document coyote trends!
Hunter, Trapper, and Hunter Observation surveys