Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

22
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural Ethiopia John Hoddinott, Derek Headey and Mekdim Dereje

description

International Food Policy Researc Institute/Ethiopia Strategy Support Program and Ethiopian Development Research Institute (EDRI) seminar series. June 11, 2013. ILRI Campus

Transcript of Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Page 1: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural Ethiopia

John Hoddinott, Derek Headey and Mekdim Dereje

Page 2: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Introduction

In rural areas, is child nutrition affected by which goods the household produces?

Conceptually, if there are complete markets, production and consumption decisions are separable

=> production decisions do not affect consumption

=> agricultural assets & production decisions only affect nutrition via their contribution to income

But if markets are missing, this will no longer be true

production decisions can directly affect nutrition

There is an opportunity for agricultural policies to influence nutrition outcomes directly, not just via income

2

Page 3: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Introduction, cont’d

Milk production is an instructive good to consider

Markets often missing since milk is naturally perishable

• In Ethiopia, 85% of all milk produced is consumed by the producing household

• Another 7% seems to be trade/bartered locally

• Domestically processed milk only started about a decade ago and largely confined to urban areas

Milk is important for growth in early life

• Cow’s milk contains and stimulates insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) which plays a key role in child growth

• Also important source of animal-sourced protein, amino acids, iron, B-12 and other micronutrients

3

Page 4: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Introduction, cont’d

Milk may also be important for other reasons:

1. Relative to solids, it’s easily digestible for young children

2. Dairy cattle often the responsibility of women, so more maternal control of milk resources than other nutrient-rich crops

Factors above may imply more opportunities for snacking

Milk consumption may also explain a long-noted paradox in Ethiopia:

some areas of high agricultural potential have relatively high rates of malnutrition (e.g SNNP); some areas of low potential have relatively low rates of stunting (e.g. Somali region) >>> could cow ownership explain this?

4

Page 5: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Introduction, cont’d

Nutrition literature finds evidence of milk impacting linear growth and other nutrition outcomes (Marquis, et al. 1997,

McLean, et al. 2007, Murphy & Allen 2003, Neumann et al. 2002, Randolph, et al. 2007)

But not much evidence on the issue at the farm level:

Small sample farm surveys from Kenya (Hoorweg, Leegwater and Veerman 2000, Nicholson, et al. 2003), and Uganda (Vella, et al. 1995)

More experimental design from Rwanda (Pimkina et al. 2013) uses cow allocation to HHs in an NGO program

Sadler et al. (2012) use an RCT with supplementary feed in pastoralist Ethiopia (during drought)

Nearly all find some impact on child growth

5

Page 6: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Data

Primarily use a very new and large (n=7,930 HHs) baseline survey for GoE’s Agricultural Growth Programme (AGP)

Sample is drawn from 94 high agricultural potential woredas, with 304 villages (EAs) , 2011

Most of the sample pertains to highlands

Although “high potential”, there is actually a lot of variation in agroecologies and market access

This variation should, in turn, produce the necessary variation in farm sizes, asset ownership and access to markets

6

Page 7: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

7

F1: AGP enumeration areas , major markets and woreda level population density

Source: http://www.gafspfund.org/content/ethiopia. Market towns (light circles) are from FEWSNET, and population density at the woreda level is from the 2007 National Census of Ethiopia. Notes: Population density categories (in persons per square kilometer) from lightest to darkest are 0-31, 31-101, 101-139, 139-195, 195-537, 537 and above.

Page 8: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Data

Data collected on agricultural assets, production, foods consumed by children under 2 years in previous seven days, anthropometry of children under 5 years

• Around one quarter of children consumed milk in the last 7 days;

• one of the most important sources of protein for young children, in a highly undiversified diet

• About 64% of households own at least one cow

• High level of stunting (47%)

8

Page 9: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Data

Cattle and other livestock ownership are also available in the Demographic Health Surveys (DHS) of 2000 and 2010

However, 2011 only includes 24 hr recall, and both surveys don’t distinguish between sex of cattle

Nevertheless, they are nationally representative high-quality surveys, so we test robustness to these data

9

Page 10: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Estimation strategy – very simple

Outcome variables:

• Did child consume milk in last 7 days

• Number of days child consumed milk in last 7 days

• Anthropometry (HAZ, stunting, WHZ, wasting)

Use linear probability models and OLS. More complicated estimators (probit, count models) produce similar results

Include as controls: child sex and age; care givers education and age; characteristics of the head (age, education, sex); region dummy variables; and capital goods for agriculture - land operated by the household for cultivation and the ownership of at least one cow.

Standard errors are clustered at the woreda level.10

Page 11: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

First some descriptives . . .

11

-2.07

-2.00-2.03

-1.73

-2.10

-2.00

-1.90

-1.80

-1.70

-1.60

-1.50

No milk 1 to 3 times 4 to 6 times Daily

Ch

ild H

az s

core

s

Consumption milk, last 7 days

Page 12: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

12

0.550.52

0.55

0.45

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

No milk 1 to 3 times 4 to 6 times Daily

Pro

bab

ility

of

be

ing

stu

nte

d

Consumption milk, last 7 days

Page 13: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Basic results

Household owns at least one cow: Impact on:(se’s in parentheses)

Marginal impacts on Anthropometry: 6-24m

Anthropometry: 12-24m

Any milk in last 7 days

# milk days last week

HAZ Stunted HAZ Stunted

0.225*** 1.263*** 0.214* -0.055* 0.324*** -0.099***

(0.024) (0.140) (0.112) (0.028) (0.117) (0.028)

13

Page 14: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Extensions and robustness checks (1): Including additional controls

Impact of cow ownership on # days milk consumed in last 7 days

1.263*** 1.005*** 1.212*** 0.983*** 1.289*** 0.818***

Other assets N Y N Y Y Y

Ag income N N Y Y Y Y

Village factors N N N N Y Y

Woreda dummy N N N N N Y

14

Impact of cow ownership on stunting, children 12-24m

-0.099*** -0.088*** -0.102*** -0.091*** -0.086*** -0.069***

Other assets N Y N Y Y Y

Ag income N N Y Y Y Y

Village factors N N N N Y Y

Woreda dummy N N N N N Y

Page 15: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Extensions and robustness checks (2): “Placebo test”

Marginal effect on any cow ownership on other types of food consumption in last seven days

Pulses Vegetables Leafy vegetables

Fruit Meat Meat organs

Eggs

0.002 -0.015 0.022 0.012 0.000 0.003 0.006

(0.027) (0.019) (0.024) (0.018) (0.016) (0.005) (0.023)

15

If cow ownership represents wealth rather than dairy consumption, we would expect it to have a significant impact on consumption of other high value foods

This placebo test suggests no evidence of this

Page 16: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Extensions and robustness checks (3): Looking for the missing markets

Food Market in village No food market in village

Any milk consumption

# days milk consumed

Stunted12-24m

Any milk consumpti

on

# days milk consumed

Stunted12-24m

HH owns cow 0.189*** 0.702** 0.114 0.222*** 1.275*** -0.119***

(0.050) (0.309) (0.106) (0.026) (0.152) (0.033)

16

Any milk consumption

# days milk consumed

HAZ12 – 24m

Stunted12-24m

HH owns cow 0.225*** 0.20*** 1.26*** 1.10*** 0.32*** 0.23* -0.099 -0.08***

(0.024) (0.024) (0.140) (0.126) (0.117) (0.130) (0.023) (0.029)

Village cows - 0.058** - 0.362***

- 0.22 -0.032

(log) (0.028) (0.152) (0.150) (0.030)

Page 17: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Extension to 2000 Ethiopian DHS

Any milk consumption

Milk every day

Stunted12-24m

Child HAZ

Stunted12-24m

Child HAZ

HH owns cow

0.20*** 0.20** -0.06*** 0.22***

or camel (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.06)

Milk daily 0.10*** 0.28***

(0.02) (0.06)

Controls

Maternal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Wealth Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Region Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

N 6150 6150 5430 5430 5430 5430

17

Page 18: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Extension to 2000 Ethiopian DHS

Any milk consumption

Milk every day

Stunted12-24m

Child HAZ

Stunted12-24m

Child HAZ

HH owns cow

0.20*** 0.20** -0.06*** 0.22***

or camel (0.02) (0.02) (0.02) (0.06)

Milk daily 0.10*** 0.28***

(0.02) (0.06)

Controls

Maternal Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Wealth Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Region Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

N 6150 6150 5430 5430 5430 5430

18

Page 19: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Conclusions

Ownership of cows is associated with higher milk consumption by children 6-24m (especially children 12-24m), improvements in HAZ and reductions in stunting

Magnitudes of effects are large – reduction in stunting of approximately 7-10 percentage points

Impact is much larger than many other variables

Some evidence that the existence of food markets can partially substitute for own production

19

Page 20: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Conclusions

Need to be cautious; not an experimental study, though results are robust to a number of checks and alternative model specifications, and even very different data

Main concern is that cows are not randomly allocated; unobservables could be associated with cattle

Particular concern is that cattle represents wealth

In future work we are exploring instrumentation strategies. Conceivably, livestock feed constraints might impact cow ownership but not nutrition directly

May also try propensity score matching

20

Page 21: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Conclusions

Interesting and important policy implications

In subsistence settings, ownership of cows at household level is key, though some externalities to ownership at village level too

But ultimately cow ownership may decline with increasing feed and water constraints, and mechanization

This decline is substituted, however, by greater market access

For GoE and partners, there may be large returns to increasing investment in dairy sector, which currently gets a tiny fraction of agricultural budget

21

Page 22: Cows, missing milk markets and nutrition in rural ethiopia

Conclusions

What sorts of investments?

Ethiopia has large livestock herd, but very little use of improved breeds

Yields are very low: about half of neighbouring Kenya

Modern processing of dairy products very limited and confined to urban areas

Potentially, important lessons to be learned from international dairy success stories, such as India

Perhaps also potential for dairy supplements, though these need to target young children

22