Covestro PUR Infusion resinmy.eventbuizz.com/assets/editorImages/1542061385-DWA_01.pdfUD, Biax,...
Transcript of Covestro PUR Infusion resinmy.eventbuizz.com/assets/editorImages/1542061385-DWA_01.pdfUD, Biax,...
covestro.com
Covestro PUR
Infusion resin Kim H. Klausen October 18
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 1
Technical advice
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 2
This information and our technical advice – whether verbal, in
writing or by ways of trial –are given in good faith but without
warranty, and this also applies where proprietary rights of third
parties are involved.
The information is provided by Covestro without assumption
of any liability.
Our advice does not release you from the obligation to verify the
information provided – especially that contained in our safety data
and technical information sheets –, to check for updates of any
information provided by us and to test our products as to their
suitability for the intended processes and uses.
The application, use and processing of our products and the
products manufactured by you on the basis of our technical
advice are beyond our control and, therefore, entirely your
own responsibility.
Our products are sold in accordance with the current version
of our General Conditions of Sale and Delivery.
Covestro PUR infusion resin
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 3
Main characteristic
• Low viscosity
• Fast curing
• Color change indicating degree of cure
• Low exotherm
• Excellent mechanical properties
Proven industrial feasibility
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 4
In April 2016, 1.5MW wind blade (37.5m, ~5800kg) was made with
Covestro polyurethane resin
Spar cap
PU resin
44 layers
UD1200
Shear web
PU resin
PVC Foam
Biax l800
Blade shell
PU resin
max.110 layers
UD, Biax, Triax
PVC foam
Balsa wood
Blade components Full blade
14 Wind Blades made – 2 Wind up running
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 5
4 x Blades 55.2m
Passed all blade tests
4 x blades 59.5m
Passed all blade tests
1 x Blade 37.5m
World First PU Blade
1 x Blade 59.5m
Passed static test
1 x Blade 63,5m
Passed static test
3 x Blade 68.5m
Section trials
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 6
Spar Cap Widest Chord
• Testing of lay up
• Testing of compatibility with other
materials like:
• Glass
• Flow mesh
• Core materials
• Peel ply
• Vap membrane
• Processing parameters
Spar Cap Section Trial
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 7
Record of infusion. Total infusion time 38 minutes.
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
00
:00
:00
00
:02
:00
00
:04
:00
00
:06
:00
00
:08
:00
00
:10
:00
00
:12
:00
00
:14
:00
00
:16
:00
00
:18
:00
00
:20
:00
00
:22
:00
00
:24
:00
00
:26
:00
00
:28
:00
00
:30
:00
00
:32
:00
00
:34
:00
00
:36
:00
00
:38
:00
Pressure Metering Valve bar
Pressure Vacuum mbar
Temp Surface Mold °C
Temp Core °C
Temp Surface PVC °C
Temp Surface Glass °C
Temp Surface Balsa °C
Pressure Core mbar
Shotweight g
We
igh
t in
gra
m
Time min.
Pre
ssu
re m
ba
r
Viscosity
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 8
100 g. resin in constant water bath
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 30 60 75 90 105 120 150 175 180
PUR 25 °C
Epoxy 25 °C
PUR 35 °C
Epoxy 35 °C
mP
a.s
Time, min.
Infusion time with PUR is in general less than 50% of Epoxy
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 9
Gra
m
Shotweight g PUR 35°C
Shotweight g Epoxy 35°C
Hour
Curing time necessary to reach min. 95% conversion rate
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
70 72,5 75 80 85 90 95 100
Ho
ur
ºC
Degree of Cure and Colour Change
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 11
Colour of test plates 4mm cured 2h@60°C, then
70°C
1h,
82%
2h,
88%
3h,
90%
12h,
94%
24h
96%
80°C
1h,
90%
2h,
94%
3h,
96%
4h,
97%
24h
96%
90°C
1h,
97%
2h,
99%
3h,
99%
4h,
99%
24h
99%
100°C
1h,
99%
2h,
99%
3h,
99.8%
4h,
99.6%
24h
99.8%
Colour change indicating degree of cure
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 12
Exothermic peaks of thick layer composite
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 13
60 layer UD composite
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
00
:00
:00
00
:15
:00
00
:30
:00
00
:45
:00
01
:00
:00
01
:15
:00
01
:30
:00
01
:45
:00
02
:00
:00
02
:15
:00
02
:30
:00
02
:45
:00
03
:00
:00
03
:15
:00
03
:30
:00
03
:45
:00
04
:00
:00
04
:15
:00
04
:30
:00
04
:45
:00
05
:00
:00
05
:15
:00
05
:30
:00
05
:45
:00
06
:00
:00
06
:15
:00
06
:30
:00
06
:45
:00
07
:00
:00
07
:15
:00
Temp Surface Mold °C AFR2017-005
Temp Core °C AFR2017-005
Temp Surface Mold °C AFR2017-012
Temp Core °C AFR2017-012
Hour
ºC
Compatibility with other resins and adhesives
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 14
PUR Resin
Epoxy resin
Full Blade
Adhesive
We have tested the
compatibility with selected
Epoxy resins and adhesives.
It is obvious to start using the
PUR resin for the Root ring and
the Spar Cap, but this requires
compatibility with other resins
and common used adhesives.
Lap shear strength between PUR and Epoxy resin
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 15
Lap shear strength between two layers of resin
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
环氧树脂+环氧基材 环氧树脂+聚氨脂基材 聚氨脂树脂+聚氨脂基材
MP
a
EP/EP EP/PU PU/PU
Lab shear strength between substrate and Epoxy adhesive
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 16
Lap shear strength with epoxy (EP) adhesive
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
3mm 0.5mm
环氧胶+环氧基材
环氧胶+聚氨脂基材
MP
a
Adhesive thickness
EP adhesive +
EP substrate
EP adhesive +
PU substrate
3 mm adhesive
thickness
0.5 mm adhesive thickness
Properties of polyurethane resin FRP
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 17
Uniaxial glass fiber TM+ glass ( EKU1200 (0) PU (TM+) )
│ Data source: CPIC Test Report QC2017/009
Properties of polyurethane resin FRP
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 18
Biaxial glass fiber E- glass ( EKB800 (+45/-45) PU )
│ Data source: CPIC Test Report QC2017/009
Properties of polyurethane resin FRP
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 19
Triaxial glass fiber E-glass EKT1250(0,+/-45) PU
│ Data source: CPIC Test Report QC2017/009
We have much more data.
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 20
• Impact strength
• Tg. by DMA, TMA, DSC
• Conversion rate by DSC
• Strength. vs. temperature
• Water absorption
• Shrinkage
• Tensile strength
• Compression strength
• Creep
• Shear strength
• Elongation
Some examples:
• Ageing test
• 70 °C 95 % Rel. Humidity
• 80 °C natural humidity
• In water at 23 °C
• Tensile module
• Tensile strength
• Mass change
• Test of composite
• Fatigue R = -1, R = 0,1
• Tensile
• Compression
• Interlinear shear
Test results
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 21
Epoxy
Fiber reinforced composite – fatigue test R= -1 tension – compression
Polyurethane
│ IMA Dresden test report, Fatigue test tension-compression
Three point bending
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 22
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Max Load
N/s
q.m
m
PUR
EP
0
0,5
1
1,5
2
2,5
3
3,5
4
Elongation at break
% PUR
EP
Longer and longer blades –
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 23
– leads to exponential increase of the cost
Blade weight
Space required
Mold cost 0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
30 45 60 75 90 105 120
CapEx/m² swept area
€
meter
SOLUTION: FASTER PRODUCTION
│ Source SGRE presentation AMI conference
Low
viscosity
Fast
curing
Better
properties
Value for our customers
October 18 │ TBM Conference Hamburg 24
Superior
Performance
Superior interface with glass fabric
Excellent mechanical performance
Superior fatigue resistance
Enables lighter
blades & lower
material cost
Improved
Productivity
Low viscosity, faster infusion speed
Faster curing, improve productivity, less investment
Lower exothermic
Faster production
leads to
reduced
CAPEX needs
Forward-looking statements
October 18 │ Presentation Title 25
This presentation may contain forward-looking statements based on current assumptions and forecasts made
by Covestro AG.
Various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors could lead to material differences between
the actual future results, financial situation, development or performance of the company and the estimates
given here. These factors include those discussed in Covestro’s public reports, which are available on the
Covestro website at www.covestro.com.
The company assumes no liability whatsoever to update these forward-looking statements or to adjust them
to future events or developments.
covestro.com
Thank you for your
attention Kim Klausen
April 2018
TBM Conference Hamburg