Course Topics - Health Care Compliance Association · 42 CFR §412.3(a); 78 Fed. Reg. 50496, 50965...
-
Upload
hoangkhanh -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Course Topics - Health Care Compliance Association · 42 CFR §412.3(a); 78 Fed. Reg. 50496, 50965...
1
Health Care Compliance AssociationClinical Practice Compliance Conference
Philadelphia, PA October 13-15, 2013
Timothy P. BlanchardRobert H. OssoffMyla R. Reizen
Clinical Appropriateness: Implications for Compliance Across the Continuum of Care:
Improving Quality and Avoiding Readmissions
Course Topics
What continuum?
What challenges?
What concerns?
What's new?
What’s better?
What to beware of.
What you can (try) to do about it.
1
Continuum of Care
Outpatient, including observation services
Inpatient admission
Discharge planning
– Post-acute care (coverage implications)
Readmission reduction
2
2
The Challenges
Taking care of people while providing services:
– Only when “reasonable and necessary”
– Meeting recognized standards of quality
– Economically (right level of care, etc.)
Adequate medical record documentation
Proper billing and correction when necessary
3
Practical Challenges for Providers
Patient care
Observation vs. inpatient admission
– Making the determinations
– Documenting the decisions
Correcting patient status errors
Part A/Part B payment adjustments
Discharge planning and effective follow-up
Reducing inappropriate readmissions
Avoiding fraud & abuse allegations in the process
4
OIG Patient Status Concerns: Both Ways OIG Report: Hospitals’ Use of Observation Stays and Short Inpatient Stays for Medicare Beneficiaries, OEI-02-12-00040 (July 29, 2013)
“Observation Stays,” “Long Outpatient Stays” and “Short Inpatient Stays”
– Similar reasons for encounters, but
– Generally higher reimbursement for inpatient stays
– Generally greater beneficiary liability for inpatient stays
– Adverse impact of observation and long outpatient stays on SNF coverage (lack of 3-day inpatient stay)
5
3
CMS Policy Changes
New inpatient admission benchmark/presumption
New documentation requirements
New final rule for correcting patient status errors
Potential confusion regarding post-acute coverage requirements
Expansion of Readmission Reduction Program
6
Observation:
Handling Changes and Errors in Patient Status
Assignment
7
Observation is Not a Patient Status
Patient Status = Inpatient or Outpatient, not Observation
Observation is a type of outpatient service
– Frequently the UR question is whether an inpatient could have been treated with observation service (i.e., as an outpatient)
Patient Status ≠ Coverage Criteria
8
4
Observation Services
“[A] well-defined set of specific, clinically appropriate services, which include ongoing short term treatment, assessment, and reassessment before a decision can be made regarding whether patients will require further treatment as hospital inpatients or if they are able to be discharged from the hospital.”
Observation services DO NOT include:– Those provided for convenience of patient/family/physician
– Those provided when inpatient admission would have been appropriate
– Standard preparation for, or monitoring related to, other services
– Post-op monitoring during standard recovery period
– Those lasting more than 48 hours, in most circumstances
9
Causes of Patient Status Assignment Errors
Differences of opinion
Proprietary non-Medicare-specific guidelines
Misunderstandings– Physicians’ obligations
– Coverage and payment implications
– Clinical care implications
Medical record documentation issues– “Medical-ese”
– Unclear orders
– Unclear supporting documentation
– Timing of orders/authentication/implementation
10
False Claims Exposure: Recent Cases
WakeMed
– Cahaba (PSC) audit in 2007
– $8 million settlement
– Deferred prosecution agreement
– Corporate integrity agreement
Shands HealthCare
– 2008 whistleblower case
$26 million settlement (Federal and State claims) Orlando Sentinel, August 2013
11
5
Medicare Reimbursement (Summary) Inpatient DRG vs. Outpatient APC Patient can be admitted as inpatient after observation
– Purpose of observation is to determine whether inpatient admission in necessary
– Effective at time of the admitting order– 3-day payment window might (or might not) apply
Once admitted as an inpatient (after inpatient order):– No APC billing
• Unless Condition Code 44 requirements are met– No change of patient status: still inpatient– Only certain services can be billed under Part B
»No services requiring outpatient status
12
Final Rule Replacing CMS Ruling 1455–R
If Medicare Part A inpatient claim is denied as not “reasonable” and “necessary” or Hospital UR discovers after discharge that admit was not “reasonable” and “necessary”
– Payment may be made under Part B for:• Any inpatient services that would have been reasonable and necessary if the beneficiary had been treated as a hospital outpatient
– Excluding services required outpatient status (with certain exceptions (e.g., outpatient therapy services))
– Any services furnished in the 3-day payment window
– Provided . . .
13
Final Rule Requirements and Limitations
PROVIDED THAT ---
Beneficiary was enrolled in Part B
Part A claim is withdrawn
Part A appeal rights waived
Part B claims billed (i.e., re-billed) within the 1-year claim filing deadline
– See 42 CFR § 424.44(a)
14
6
Final Rule Limitation
Part B payment will not be available for denials issued too late for timely rebilling – i.e., for most denials
42 C.F.R. § 414.5; 78 Fed. Reg. 50496 (Aug. 19. 2013)
15
Handling Patient Status Errors
Errors detected before discharge (CC-44)
Post-discharge determinations (Final Rule)
– Expanded Part B billing for inpatient services
– 1-year re-billing deadline
Strong incentive for:– Concurrent case management and/or
– Prompt post-discharge internal utilization review
Disincentive for reliance on denial management and appeals
16
Condition Code 44 Criteria (Not Changed)
UR Committee decides inpatient criteria are not satisfied
Change before discharge and before hospital billing
Physician’s concurrence is documented in medical record
Observation time starts when the physician orders observation and nursing begins to implement it.
– Not retroactive; time on inpatient status does not count toward OPPS observation service claim
“Reporting of individual HCPCS codes on an outpatient claim must be consistent with all instructions and CMS guidance, including . . . direct supervision required for hospital outpatient therapeutic services.”
17
7
Utilization Review Rules vs. Condition Code 44
Normal UR committee rules allow decisions to be made either:
– (1) by one member of the UR Committee and the “practitioner or practitioners responsible for the care of the patient” or
– (2) by two physician members of the UR Committee without the concurrence of the treating physician(s).
In either case, the patient’s rights are protected by mandatory opportunity to confer regarding UR Committee determinations
18
Inpatient Admissions--
Decisionmaking and Documentation
19
Inpatient/Outpatient: Patient Status Matters
Basis of hospital coverage and payment
Impact on coverage for SNF care
Patient co-payment obligations
Focus of Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)
Overpayment exposure
Potential False Claims exposure
Effectiveness of Provider’s
Utilization Review and Discharge Planning Functions
Compliance Program
20
8
Patient Status: New Rules
Concern about recent increases in time Medicare beneficiaries spend as outpatients receiving observation services:– Number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving observation services
for more than 48 hours increased from approximately 3 percent in 2006 to approximately 8 percent in 2011. “This trend concerns us because of the potential financial impact on Medicare beneficiaries.”
Desire to improve clarity and consensus regarding relationship between admissions decisions and appropriate Medicare payment
21
Revised Inpatient Admission Requirements
[A]n individual is considered an inpatient of a hospital, including a critical access hospital, if formally admitted as an inpatient pursuant to an order for inpatient admission by a physician or other qualified practitioner in accordance with this section and §§ 482.24(c), 482.12(c), and 485.638(a)(4)(iii) of this chapter for a critical access hospital.
42 CFR § 412.3(a); 78 Fed. Reg. 50496, 50965 (Aug. 19, 2013) (emphasis added).
22
Specific Inpatient Admission Requirements
§ 482.24(c) – Medical Records Condition of Participation
§ 482.12(c) – Medical Staff Appointment, Admitting Privileges, Condition of Participation
§ 485.636(a)(4)(iii) – CAH-specific rule
§ 412.622 – IRF-specific rules
New requirements in § 412.3 itself
23
9
§ 412.3(a) Requirements
“This physician order must be present in the medical record and be supported by the physician admission and progress notes, in order for the hospital to be paid for hospital inpatient services under Medicare Part A.”– It is a Condition of Payment, not just a Condition of
Participation (COP)
– Note the ANDs
24
§ 412.3(b) Requirements
“The order must be furnished by a qualified and licensed practitioner who has admitting privileges at the hospital as permitted by State law, and who is knowledgeable about the patient’s hospital course, medical plan of care, and current condition.”
The ordering may not be delegated to an individual who is not authorized to admit patients, . . . “or has not been granted admitting privileges applicable to that patient by the hospital’s medical staff.”
25
§ 412.3(c) and (d) Requirements
Physician order also constitutes required component of physician certification of the medical necessity of hospital inpatient services under subpart B of Part 424
“Physician order must be furnished at or before the time of the inpatient admission.”
26
10
Physician Certification Requirements
Physician must certify/recertify:
– That services are provided in accordance with §412.3;
– Reasons for inpatient admission or special or unusual services in cost outlier cases;
– Estimated time patient needs to remain in the hospital;
– Plans for posthospital care, if appropriate.
Must be completed, signed, documented in the medical record prior to discharge.
42 CFR § 424.13, see also §§ 424.11, 424.14-.15
27
Benchmark and Presumption § 412.3(e)
Inpatient Admission appropriate when:
– For procedure on Inpatient Only List, or
– THE PHYSICIAN EXPECTS the patient to require a stay that crosses at least two midnights.
Otherwise: the services are generally inappropriate for inpatient admission and Medicare Part A payment, “regardless of the hour that the patient came to the hospital or whether the patient used a bed.”
– Except in unforeseen circumstances, e.g., death or transfer resulting in a shorter stay than expected
28
Application of the 2-Midnights Rule
“Medicare’s review contractors [are to] consider all time after the initiation of care at the hospital in applying the benchmark.”
“in the hospital receiving medically necessary services” ≠ as an “inpatient” – i.e., after the inpatient order
– Outpatient observation time counts toward benchmark, but is not considered inpatient
– Inpatient care starts with the inpatient order, but one midnight in OBS can be considered towards the new (2-midnights) benchmark
29
11
No Presumption Regarding Medical Necessity
“No presumptive weight shall be assigned to the physician’s order under § 412.3 or the physician’s certification under Subpart B of Part 424 of the chapter in determining the medical necessity of inpatient hospital services under section 1862(a)(1) of the Act.”
“A physician’s order or certification will be evaluated in the context of the evidence in the medical record.”
42 CFR § 412.46(b) (medical review requirements)
30
Two-Midnights Rule Compliance is Rebuttable
If a hospital is found to be abusing this 2-midnight presumption for nonmedically necessary inpatient hospital admissions and payment (in other words, the hospital is systematically prolonging the provision of care to surpass the 2-midnight timeframe), CMS review contractors would disregard the 2-midnight presumption when conducting review of that hospital.
31
§ 412.3(e) Requirements
“The expectation of the physician should be based on such complex medical factors as patient history and comorbidities, the severity of signs and symptoms, current medical needs, and the risk of an adverse event.”
“The factors that lead to a particular clinical expectation must be documented in the medical record in order to be granted consideration.”
32
12
Discharge Planning
33
CoP: Discharge Planning (42 U.S.C. § 1395x(ee))
• Identify, at an early stage of hospitalization, patients likely to have adverse health consequences without adequate discharge planning• Discharge Planning Evaluation
• Ensure that appropriate arrangements for post-hospital care will be made before discharge• Include likely need for appropriate post-hospital services and the availability of those services through participating providers in the area (“that request to be listed by the hospital”)• Discuss with the patient (or representative)
• Hospital must arrange for the development AND initial implementation of a discharge plan for the patient (“upon the request of a patient's physician”)
34
Discharge Planning: Survey Interpretation
The hospital is responsible for developing the discharge plan for patients who need a plan and for arranging its initial implementation. The hospital's ability to meet discharge planning requirements is based on the following:
• Implementation of a needs assessment process with identified high-risk criteria;• Evidence of a complete, timely, and accurate assessment;• Maintenance of a complete and accurate file on community-based services and facilities including long-term care, sub-acute care, home care or other appropriate levels of care to which patients can be referred; and • Coordination of the discharge planning evaluation among various disciplines responsible for patient care.
• State Operations Manual, App. A, A-0808; see 42 C.F.R. § 482.43(b)(4)
35
13
QIO Review Implications
• Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Review
“Focusing on readmissions is a great way totackle inappropriate use of hospital stays, ”…[Readmissions are] “the intersection of threethings we care about: cost, quality, and patientsafety.” Jane Brock, M.D., Colorado Foundationfor Medical Care
36
• QIO Reviews Include:
• Reasonable and medically necessary
• Early readmissions (<31 days) “to determine if the previous inpatient hospital services and the post-hospital services met professionally recognized standards of health care.”
• Whether a hospital has misrepresented admission or discharge information or has taken an action that results in—(i) The unnecessary admission . . . under Part A;(ii) Unnecessary multiple admissions of an individual; or . . .
• 42 U.S.C. § 1320c-3; 42 C.F.R. § 476.71; QIO Manual, IOM 100-10, Chap. 4
QIO Review Implications
37
Defending Discharge Appropriateness-1
• Documentation Quality
• EMR vs. hard copy medical records
• Discharge summary vs. discharge/transfer records
• Discharge summary vs. internal consultation reports, PT/OT/speech/respiratory therapy recommendations
• Discharge summary vs. discharge/take home orders vs. problem list vs. care plan vs. medication reconciliation vs. discharge plan
38
14
Defending Discharge Appropriateness-2
• Process, Process, Process• Appropriate, coordinated inpatient consultations
• Address all clinical recommendations, resolve conflicts
• Communication: patient and family comprehension
• Communication: post-acute and primary care providers
• Ongoing case management and utilization review
39
Readmission Reduction
40
• Estimated 12% of all 2011 Medicareadmissions were followed by a potentiallypreventable readmission.
• Potential savings from reducing avoidablereadmissions by 10% would achieve $1billion or more.
Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) (2013)
The Problem – for Medicare and Patients
41
15
Problems for Providers – Practical
Lack of Actual Control
Admission Decisions – physician ordered
Discharge Decisions – physician ordered
Patient Compliance with discharge orders
Availability of appropriate post-acute care
Effectiveness of post-acute care providers
Physician follow-up after discharge
42
Problems for Providers – Practical
Service area demographics
Poverty, high risk populations
Social circumstances, home environment, social services
Other providers/suppliers in the continuum of care
Physicians, clinics, HHAs, SNFs, PT/OT, DME, public health
43
Problems for Providers – Regulatory
• Reimbursement• Payment Denials (Not Reasonable and Necessary)
• Hospital Readmission Reduction Program
• Adverse Impact on Value-Based Purchasing
• Licensing & Certification (e.g., Discharge Planning, UR)
• QIO Review• Adverse Quality Findings
• Alleged Circumvention of the Prospective Payment System
• OIG Work Plan
• “Hospital Compare” Website Reporting Implications
• Potential CMPL/FCA/Fraud & Abuse Allegations
44
16
Between a Rock and a Hard Place
• Potential Civil Money Penalty Law (CMPL) Allegations
• HIPAA Privacy/Security Rule Implications
• Avoiding Fraud and Abuse Allegations While Trying to Avoid Unnecessary Readmissions Findings/Allegations• Beneficiary Inducement Prohibition
• Anti-kickback Implications of Provider/Supplier Arrangements
• Honoring Patient Choice
• Uncertainty in Medicine / Medical Judgment
• Not Discouraging Appropriate Readmissions
• All While Taking Care of Patients
45
CMS on the Patient Compliance Problem
We recognize that some patients choose not to follow a recommended treatment plan, even when they have access to the care they need. However, all hospitals have the opportunity to reduce the rate of readmission, even among less compliant patients. Improving readmission rates is the joint responsibility of hospitals and clinicians. Measuring readmissions will create incentives to invest in interventions to improve hospital care, better assess the readiness of patients for discharge, and facilitate transitions to outpatient status.
78 Fed. Reg. at 50652 (emphasis added).
46
Readmission Reduction Program
• Reduction to base DRG rate for hospitals with “excessive readmissions” within 30 days
• Maximum FY2013 1%, FY2014 2%, FY 2015 3%
• Excess readmission ratio: actual to expected risk-adjusted readmissions of specified DRGs/conditions
• Planned Readmission Algorithm 2.1 • 42 CFR § 412.152; 77 Fed. Reg. 53258, 53374-401
(Aug. 31, 2012); 78 Fed. Reg. 50496, 50649-76 (Aug. 19, 2013)
47
17
Factors Not in Risk Adjustment
Patient race, ethnicity, language,
Income
Lifestyle
Health literacy
Dual-eligible status; insurance status
Functional status, cognitive impairment
Post-discharge care support structure
Access to primary care
48
Readmission Reduction Program
Conditions:• FY 2013-FY 2014
• Acute myocardial infarction (MI),
• Heart failure (HF)
• Pneumonia (PN)• Add for FY 2015
• Acute exacerbation of chronic pulmonary obstructive disease (COPD)
• Total hip arthroplasty (THA)
• Total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
49
Readmission Reduction Program Penalties
• $227 million this year in penalties.
• 2225 penalized hospitals (2/3s of hospitals)
• 18 maximum 2% penalty
• 154 penalized 1% or more
• Who has the highest readmission rates?
• How does this compare to Year 1?
(Kaiser Health News, August 2013)
50
18
Approaches to Reducing Readmissions-1
Avoiding Readmissions Starts at Admission
Inpatient Care – Effective Staff Nurses
– Medication Reconciliation and Problem Lists
– Communication Among Care Teams
– Care Plan Communication – Including Patient Involvement
Comprehensive Case Management
Discharge Planning – Assess Patient Self-Care Capability, Home Circumstances
– Physician Coordination
51
Approaches to Reducing Readmissions-2
Encouraging Compliance with Discharge Instructions
Patient Coaching Initiate Implementation of Discharge Plan
– Improve Transitions/Handoffs to Post-Acute Providers
Post-Discharge Hospital Follow-Up
– Scheduling Assistance Follow Up Appointments– Follow-up Home Visits (not covered HHA?)
Integration Between Acute and Post Acute Providers
– e.g., Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), etc.
Providing or facilitating transportation for follow-up care and other patient assistance (beware fraud & abuse issues)
52
Summaries and Resources
“Preventing Hospital Readmissions: The First Test Case For Continuity Of Care” (Computer Sciences Corporation, 2012)
– http://assets1.csc.com/health_services/downloads/CSC_Preventing_Hospital_Readmission.pdf
The Revolving Door: A Report on U.S. Hospital Readmissions (Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, February 2013)
53
19
Best Practices / Compliance Risks
Patient Inducement (42 U.S.C. §1320a-7a(a)(5))
[O]ffers or transfers remuneration . . . to any individual eligible . . . that such person knows or should know is likely to influence such individual to order or to receivefrom a particular provider, practitioner or supplier any item or service for which payment may be made, . . . , under Medicare or a State health care program.
Patient Steering and Patient Choice
• HHA, SNF, DME, Provider-Affiliated Physicians
Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) Allegations
54
Additional Compliance Issues
Patient confidentiality/privacy
Licensure (for outreach/follow-up personnel
Credentials (for outreach/follow-up personnel)
Consent for treatment
Orders for treatment and evaluation
Liability
State-specific requirements
Managed care contract
55
Shared Savings Program Waivers
• Protect certain beneficiary inducements by ACOs in the program, 76 Fed. Reg. 67992 (Nov. 2, 2011) if:– There is a reasonable connection between the
items/services and patient medical care– The items or services are in-kind.– The items or services are preventative; or– The inducements a\dvance one or more of the
following clinical goals:• i. Adherence to a treatment regime.• ii. Adherence to a drug regime.• iii. Adherence to a follow-up care plan.• iv. Management of a chronic disease or condition.
56
20
Favorable OIG Advisory Opinion 13-10First AO specifically addressing readmissions
Contract with hospital to provide services to patients with certain diagnoses following hospital discharge to reduce preventable readmissions
–Patient liaison
–24-hour nurse hotline
–Reports, e.g., on patient medication adherence and post-discharge physician appointment completion
57
Other OIG Guidance -1
OIG Advisory Opinion: 06-01—Free Pre-Operative Home Safety Assessment By HHA: Unfavorable
“[T]he purpose of the assessment is to ascertain whether the patient’s home is suitable for postoperative recovery. During the assessment, a physical therapist gathers basic information about the patient (e.g., past surgical history and history of falls) and basic information about the patient’s residence (e.g., number of stories, number of steps, and presence of tripping hazards). The therapist conducting the assessment may also offer limited suggestions about simple home safety improvements (e.g., removing throw rugs and placing a telephone in an accessible location), but the assessment does not include any skilled care, significant patient education, or exercise or other therapeutic instruction.”
“Requestor delivers the free services in a manner that would lead a reasonable beneficiary to believe that he or she is receiving a valuable service, and that may actually comprise a valuable service.”
58
Other OIG Guidance-2
OIG Advisory Opinion 12-13 – Free Hearing Tests: Favorable
OIG Advisory Opinion: 02-14 – Free Safety Equipment and Pagers for Hemophilia Patients/Parents: Unfavorable
OIG Advisory Opinion: 03-04 – Medical Alert Pagers For Homebound: Favorable
OIG Advisory Opinion: 07-16 – Educational Videos by HHA for Prospective Ortho Patients: Favorable
59
21
Other OIG Guidance-3
OIG Advisory Opinion: 8-14 – Motivational Incentives at Substance Abuse Center: Favorable
OIG Advisory Opinion: 11-7 – Vaccine Reminder Program Without Incentives: Favorable
OIG Advisory Opinion: 02-12 – Online Clinical Compliance Program With Incentives: Favorable
OIG Advisory Opinion: 10-08 – Radiation Therapy Center Provision of Dietitian and Social Worker Services Without Additional Charge: Favorable
– Analysis of scope of “covered services”• OIG Advisory Opinion: 07-19 – Radiology Reports Part of
Professional Service: Favorable
60
Key Questions for AKS Risk Assessment
Does the arrangement or practice have a potential to interfere with, or skew, clinical decision-making?
Does the arrangement or practice have a potential to increase costs to Federal health care programs, beneficiaries, or enrollees?
Does the arrangement or practice have a potential to increase the risk of overutilization or inappropriate utilization?
Does the arrangement or practice raise patient safety or quality of care concerns?
OIG Supp. Compliance Guidance; 70 Fed. Reg. 4858, 4864 (Jan. 31, 2005) (emphasis added).
61
Final Thoughts
First, Do No Harm
Don’t Forget the Patient
Don’t Forget Compliance Review
Don’t Forget to Get Legal Advice
Don’t Forget State Law and State Oversight
Don’t Forget Risk Management Concerns
Focus on the Fundamentals and Follow Up
62
22
Fundamentals and Follow-Up
Documenting orders (planned admits, ED, OBS)
– What were the instructions?
Supporting medical record documentation
– What was the clinical thinking?
Case Management and Discharge Planning
Prompt, concurrent if possible, Utilization Review
Post discharge coordination and communication– Follow up on the follow up
Handling unavoided re-admission situations
63
Questions
Timothy P. BlanchardBlanchard Manning LLP
Myla R. ReizenJones Walker LLP
Robert H. OssoffVanderbilt University Medical Center
64