Course No.: MEBF ZC342 MACHINE DESIGN L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta Prof. D. Datta.
-
Upload
ami-summers -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
2
Transcript of Course No.: MEBF ZC342 MACHINE DESIGN L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta Prof. D. Datta.
Course No.: MEBF ZC342MACHINE DESIGN
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Prof. D. Datta
An Overview of the Subject
The Essence of Engineering is the Utilization of resources and the Laws of Nature for the benefit of Mankind
Engineering is an applied science in the sense that it is concerned with understanding scientific principles and applying them to achieve a designated goal.
Mechanical Engineering Design is a major segment of Engineering.
Machine Design is a segment of the Mechanical Engineering Design in which decisions regarding shape and size of Machines or Machine components are taken for their satisfactory intended performance.
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Phases in Design
Identification of Need
Definition of Problem
Synthesis
Analysis and Optimization
Evaluation
Presentation
Design is a highly Iterative Process
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Steps in DesignIdntify the Need
Collect Data to Describe the System
Estimate Initial Design
Analyze the System
Check Performance Criteria
Is Design Satisfactory? Yes Stop
No
Change the Design based on Experience/Calculation
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Design Considerations
1. Functionality2. Strength3. Stiffness / Distortion4. Wear5. Corrosion6. Safety7. Reliability8. Manufacturability9. Utility10. Cost11. Friction12. Weight13. Life
14. Noise15. Styling16. Shape17. Size18. Control19. Thermal Properties20. Surface21. Lubrication22. Marketability23. Maintenance24. Volume25. Liability26. Remanufacturing
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Loads and Equilibrium
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Restraints
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Stresses
Uni-axial Stress
X
AP
x
X
2cos)cos/(cos
A
PA
P cossin)cos/(
sinA
PA
P
A
Normal Stress Shear Stress
Torsional Shear Stress
d
LinearVariation
τmax
J
Tr
J
dT )2/(max
J = Polar Moment of Inertia =32
4d
Angle of Twist
GJ
Tl
Torsion formula with slowly varying area may be used as long as they are circular
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Torsional Shear Stress (cont’d)
d
x
y
z
xz
xy
J
dTx
)2/(max
cosxz
sinxy
Here, τxz is negative as it acts opposite to the +z-axisbut τxy is positive as it acts along the +y-axis
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Normal Stresses due to Bending
I
Myx
M = Bending Momenty = Distance of the layer from Neutral AxisI = Moment of Inertia of the cross section about the axis of bending
X
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
P
P/2P/2 L/2L/2
P/2P/2 -+
PL/4
+
b
d
3
12
1bdI
-+
BM Sign
A Problem: Get the Shear Force and BM Distribution
L1: Stress Analysis Principles, Prof. D. Datta
Getting Maximum Normal and Shear Stresses
x
xyxy
X
2sin2cos22 xyxx
2cos2sin2 xyx
Combining the above two equations
22
22
22 xyxx
Equation of a circle
22
minmax, 22 xyxx
Remember this
y
Ductile Materials
• Material exhibits sufficient elongation and necking before fracture
• Yield point is distinct in stress strain curve
• Ultimate tensile and compressive strength are nearly same
• Primarily fails by shear
Engineering Stress Strain Curve
(MPa)
yp
Nyp
0
100
200
300
400
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 39.0 39.1 39.2strain /%
+
0
fracture
plastic region,extension uniformalong length
plastic region,necking hasbegun
elasticregion
Engineering Stress Strain Curve (cont’d)
Necking in a Tensile Specimen
Cup and Cone Fracture
Brittle Materials
• Material does not exhibit sufficient elongation and necking before fracture.
• Yield point is not distinct in the stress strain curve, an equivalent Proof
Stress is used in place of the Yield Stress.
• Ultimate tensile and compressive strength are not same, compressive
strength could be as high as three times of the tensile strength.
• Primarily fails by tension.
Proof Stress
Theories of failure for Ductile Materials
• Maximum Principal Stress Theory: Rankine
• Maximum Shear Stress Theory: Tresca
• Maximum Principal Strain Theory: St. Venant
• Maximum Strain Energy Theory: Beltrami and Haigh
• Maximum Distortion Energy Theory: von Mises
Maximum Shear Stress Theory: Tresca’s Theory
Statement
Failure will occur in a material if the maximum shear stress at apoint due to a given set of load exceeds the maximum shearStress induced due to a uniaxial load at the Yield Point.
YP 21For failure not to occur
With factor of safety
NYP 21
For failure not to occur
Maximum Distortion Energy Theory: von Mises Theory
Statement
Failure will occur in a material if the maximum distortion energy at apoint due to a given set of load exceeds the maximum distortionEnergy induced due to a uniaxial load at the Yield Point.
For failure not to occur
With factor of safety
22
2212
1
NYP
For failure not to occur
22221
21 YP
Theories of failure for Brittle Materials
• Maximum Principal Stress Theory: Rankine
• Mohr’s Theory
• Coulomb Mohr Theory
• Modified Mohr Theory
Maximum Normal Stress Theory for Brittle Materials
The maximum stress criterion states that failure occurs whenthe maximum principal stress reaches either the uniaxial tensionstrength σt or the uniaxial compression strength σc .
tc },{ 21For failure not to occur
Coulomb Mohr’s Theory of Failure for Brittle Materials
All intermediate stress states fall into one of the four categories in the following table. Each case defines the maximum allowable values for the two principal stresses to avoid failure.
Case Principal Stresses
Criterion Requirements
1. Both in tension
1 > 0, 2 > 0 1 < t, 2 < t
2. Both in Compression
1 < 0, 2 < 0 1 < c, 2 < c
3. One in T and other in C
1 > 0, 2 < 0
4. One in T and other in C
1 < 0, 2 > 0
Variable Loading or Fatigue Loading
S-N Diagram
Failure Criteria for Variable Loading or Fatigue Loading
Gerber (Germany, 1874):
Goodman (England, 1899):
Soderberg (USA, 1930):
Morrow (USA, 1960s):
Failure Lines for Different Fatigue Failure Criteria
Factors Affecting Endurance Limit
· Surface Finish· Temperature· Stress Concentration· Notch Sensitivity· Size· Environment· Reliability