Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

23
Coupled Model Exercise Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3 Exercise 3 George H. Leavesley, Research Hydrologist, USGS, Denver,

description

Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3. George H. Leavesley, Research Hydrologist, USGS, Denver, CO. TOOL BOX MODELING VIEWS. Research Model Developer Complex Detail Application Model Developer Model User Resource Manager Policy Maker Condensed Analysis. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Page 1: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Coupled Model ExerciseCoupled Model Exercise

Exercise 3Exercise 3

George H. Leavesley, Research Hydrologist, USGS, Denver, CO

Page 2: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

TOOL BOX MODELING TOOL BOX MODELING VIEWSVIEWS

Research Model Developer Research Model Developer Complex Complex DetailDetail

Application Model DeveloperApplication Model Developer Model UserModel User Resource ManagerResource Manager Policy Maker Policy Maker Condensed Condensed

AnalysisAnalysis

Page 3: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

LEVELS OF MODULAR LEVELS OF MODULAR DESIGNDESIGN

PROCESSPROCESS MODELMODEL FULLY COUPLED MODELSFULLY COUPLED MODELS LOOSELY COUPLED MODELSLOOSELY COUPLED MODELS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMSDECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT ANALYSIS AND SUPPORT

TOOLSTOOLS

Single Purpose

Multi-objective, Complex

Page 4: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3
Page 5: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

CRITERIA AND RULES CRITERIA AND RULES FOR GOOD MODULE FOR GOOD MODULE

DESIGNDESIGN

relate directly to real world relate directly to real world components or processescomponents or processes

have input and output variables have input and output variables that are measurable valuesthat are measurable values

communicate solely via these communicate solely via these input and output variablesinput and output variables

Modules should

Reynolds J.F., and Acock, B., 1997, Modularity and genericness in plant and ecosystem models: Ecological Modeling 94, p 7-16

Page 6: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3
Page 7: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Model Building Tool - XMBUILD

Page 8: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

LOOSELEY COUPLED LOOSELEY COUPLED MODELSMODELS

Watershed Model

Hydraulics Model

Database

Fish Model

Data Management Interface (DMI)

MMS Model

Off-the-shelf Model

Page 9: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

LOOSELEY COUPLED LOOSELEY COUPLED MODELSMODELS

Watershed Model

Hydraulics Model

Fish Model

PRMSPRMS

Habitat Habitat Suitability Suitability

IndexIndex

Channel Geometry Analysis Program

(CGAP)

Page 10: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

OBJECT USER INTEFACE (OUI)

Page 11: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Other Model Integration Other Model Integration ApproachesApproaches

U.S.U.S. BASINS (EPA)BASINS (EPA) FRAMES (DOE, NRC, DOD, EPA)FRAMES (DOE, NRC, DOD, EPA) DIAS (DOE)DIAS (DOE) XMS (WMS, GMS, SMS, … - EMS XMS (WMS, GMS, SMS, … - EMS

Inc.)Inc.) OMS (USDA)OMS (USDA)

InternationalInternational HarmonIT (Europe)HarmonIT (Europe) Catchment Modeling Toolkit Catchment Modeling Toolkit

(Australia)(Australia)

Page 12: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Exercise 3 ProblemsExercise 3 Problems

1.0 MMS_PET1.0 MMS_PET Process comparisonProcess comparison

2.0 MMS PRMS Daily Mode2.0 MMS PRMS Daily Mode Watershed model evaluationWatershed model evaluation

3.0 MMS PRMS-HIS3.0 MMS PRMS-HIS Coupled watershed-hydraulics-habitat Coupled watershed-hydraulics-habitat

modelmodel

Page 13: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Potential Potential Evapotranspiration (potet)Evapotranspiration (potet)

- Hamon

- Jensen - Haise

potet(HRU) = hamon_coef(mo) * dyl2 * vdsat

potet(HRU) = jh_coef(mo) * --------------------------- -- (tavf(HRU) - jh_coef_hru) * rin

Page 14: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

PRMSPRMS

Page 15: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

HRUs

Page 16: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

LOOSELEY COUPLED LOOSELEY COUPLED MODELSMODELS

Watershed Model

Hydraulics Model

Fish Model

PRMSPRMS

Habitat Habitat Suitability Suitability

IndexIndex

Channel Geometry Analysis Program

(CGAP)

Page 17: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Channel Cross-Channel Cross-sectionsection

Page 18: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Channel Channel CharacteristicsCharacteristics

Page 19: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Q = A*VQ = A*V

V = 1.486/n * RV = 1.486/n * R2/3 * * SS1/2

n is Mannings n n is Mannings n R is R is hydraulic radius hydraulic radius S is channel S is channel slope slope

Basic Channel Basic Channel HydraulicsHydraulics

Page 20: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Velocity HSI - Brown Trout

00.20.40.6

0.81

1.2

0 1 2 3 4

velocity m/s

HS

I

Adult

Juvenile

Fingerling

Spawning

Habitat Suitability Index – Habitat Suitability Index – VelocityVelocity

Page 21: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

Depth HSI - Brown Trout

00.20.40.6

0.81

1.2

0 1 2 3

Depth m

HS

I

Adult

Juvenile

Fingerling

Spawning

Habitat Suitability Index Habitat Suitability Index - Depth- Depth

Page 22: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

WUA = ( velocity_hsi *

depth_hsi * x-sect_width * 100.)

Weighted Usable Weighted Usable Area (WSU)Area (WSU)

Page 23: Coupled Model Exercise Exercise 3

MORE INFORMATIONMORE INFORMATION

http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/mmshttp://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/mms

http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/weaselweasel

http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/http://wwwbrr.cr.usgs.gov/warsmpwarsmp

http://oms.ars.usda.govhttp://oms.ars.usda.gov

http://www.iscmem.orghttp://www.iscmem.org