Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee MEETING ... · 1/24/2017 · Caltrans District...

490 Mendocino Ave. #206, Santa Rosa, CA | 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov

Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee

MEETING AGENDA January 24, 2017 – 1:30 p.m.

Sonoma County Transportation Authority SCTA Large Conference Room

490 Mendocino Avenue, Suite 206 Santa Rosa, California 95401

ITEM

1. Introductions

2. Approval of Meeting Notes: November 22, 2016 - DISCUSSION / ACTION*

3. Public Comment

4. CBPAC Officer Elections for 2017 - DISCUSSION / ACTION*

5. Complete Streets Checklists 5.1. OBAG 2, Safe Routes to School - DISCUSSION / ACTION* 5.2. OBAG 2, various applications - DISCUSSION*

6. TDA3/TFCA Quarterly Report – Information*

7. TDA3 FY17/18 Call for Projects – Discussion*

8. Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan Update – Information*

9. Projects for Caltrans Bike Plan and Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Discussion

10. ATP Cycle 3 Regional Grant Recommendations – Information*

11. Roundtable updates - Discussion

12. Other Business / Comments / Announcements

13. Adjourn - ACTION *Materials attached **Materials to be handed out

The next SCTA/RCPA meeting will be held February 6, 2017 The next CBPAC meeting will be held March 28, 2017

Copies of the full Agenda Packet are available at www.scta.ca.gov

DISABLED ACCOMMODATION: If you have a disability that requires the agenda materials to be in an alternate format or that requires an interpreter or other person to assist you while attending this meeting, please contact SCTA/RCPA at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to ensure arrangements for accommodation. SB 343 DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OPEN SESSION AGENDAS: Materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the Sonoma County Transportation Authority office at 490 Mendocino Ave., Suite 206, during normal business hours.

Pagers, cellular telephones and all other communication devices should be turned off during the committee meeting to avoid electrical interference with the sound recording system. TO REDUCE GHG EMISSIONS: Please consider carpooling or taking transit to this meeting. For more information check www.511.org, www.srcity.org/citybus, www.sctransit.com or https://carmacarpool.com/sfbay

tel:707.565.5373

http://scta.ca.gov/

http://rcpa.ca.gov/

http://www.scta.ca.gov/

http://www.511.org/

http://www.srcity.org/citybus

http://www.sctransit.com/

https://carmacarpool.com/sfbay

COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES

Meeting Notes of November 22, 2016

ITEM

1. Introductions Meeting called to order at 1:30 by Chair Wendy Atkins. Committee Members: Wendy Atkins, City of Sonoma, Chair; Geoffrey Skinner, City of Sebastopol, Vice Chair; Steven Schmitz, Sonoma County Transit; Curtis Bates, City of Petaluma; Nancy Adams, City of Santa Rosa; Mona Ibrahim, Town of Windsor; Elizabeth Tyree, Sonoma County Regional Parks. Guests: Steve Weinberger, W-Trans; Tina Panza, Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition. Staff: Seana Gause, Dana Turréy.

2. Approval of Meeting Notes: September 27, 2016 - DISCUSSION / ACTION*

Approved as submitted.

3. Public Comment N/A

4. Notice of Elections – Discussion

Dana Turréy pointed to the staff report regarding the notice of elections at the first meeting of 2017. Nominations for Chair and Vice Chair are welcome at this meeting or during the elections on January 24, 2017. The current Chair, Wendy Atkins, has decided to step down from this position in 2017.

5. One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG 2) SCTA Call for Projects – Discussion

Seana Gause introduced the Call for Projects for the second round of the One Bay Area Grant (OBAG2). Ms. Gause pointed to the web links in the agenda with the application, maps, and other relevant documentation. Applications are due on January 13, 2017. All funding available through this program is now all Surface Transportation Program (STP) and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ). All eligible recipients are encouraged to apply. Anyone who is not an eligible recipient is encouraged to partner with an agency that is an eligible recipient. Discussion continued regarding specific potential projects and partnerships.

6. Roundtable updates – Discussion City of Sebastopol: Steve Weinberger reported that W-Trans is working on a bikelane design project for Sebastopol for Bodega Highway from the Dutton/Jewel intersection to the City limits, past Regal Park. Bike lanes will end at Regal and will connect with a two-way trail that will connect with West County Trail. Geoffrey Skinner noted another project is underway in the same area for a pedestrian crossing at Bodega and Nelson Way. Mr. Weinberger added that there are five intersections with pedestrian crossings improvements that have been adopted by council.

These include Florence, Washington, Robinson Road, Nelson near the Burbank Housing, and Regal. The City’s hope is to get this out to bid for construction at the beginning of next fiscal year. City of Petaluma: Curtis Bates reported that the City completed the Lakeville Street improvements between D Street and Caulfield, including green bicycle lanes on both sides of the street and an enhanced crosswalk at D Street and Copeland. The City is working with SMART on securing bike racks and lockers at the downtown station. Town of Windsor: Mona Ibrahim announced that the Town put out an RFP last week to seek help prioritizing an existing list of Class I bike/pedestrian trails with a cost analysis. Hoping to award the feasibility study in January 2017. Sonoma County: Steven Schmitz discussed the summer’s pavement preservation season and bicycle striping and signing installed in conjunction with repaving projects. These projects include striping on Rohnert Park Expressway West, Petaluma Hill Road, and Santa Rosa Avenue. Roughly 30 to 40 miles of Class 2 bike lanes installed over the past five years as part of repaving projects. The Bicycle Safety Campaign is moving along and contractors for graphic design is being sought. City of Santa Rosa: Nancy Adams provided an update on the Jennings Crossing project at SMART. The City is working with SMART on reimbursement agreement for construction work within the right of way after the start of 2017. The City will then do the Jennings Avenue portion. The City has a few TDA Article 3 projects underway, including Class II bike lanes and various green bike lanes.

The City is working on adjusting signal timing for minimum greens to try to make traffic work better for cyclists. The City is also participating in walking audits with the Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition. Sonoma County Bicycle Coalition: Tina Panza provided an update on the database for Safe Routes to School, summarizing information on all of the infrastructure recommendations from past walking audits. The database should be complete soon. Ms. Panza would like to share the database with public works departments to figure out the best way to track these projects moving forward. Ms. Panza reported that the County’s GIS Department helped SCBC map recommendations, schools, etc. This will be a very useful tool for anyone looking for data around schools. Sonoma County Regional Parks: Elizabeth Tyree reported that Regional Parks applied for funding for a feasibility study for a multi-use trail along a - 9 mile stretch of the lower Russian River, from to odd Fellows Road to Duncans Mills. This is building on recommendations in the Lower Russian River Community Based Transportation Plan prepared by SCTA. A question was asked about the feasibility study for the Sebastopol/Petaluma Trail. Ms. Tyree responded that they are currently wrapping up the gathering information phase and will be scheduling the next meeting. City of Sonoma: Wendy Atkins announced that the City of Sonoma contracted with SCBC to develop press release about the top 10 things you should know about bikes. Ms. Atkins will send around the press release to Ms. Turréy for distribution to Committee members.

7. Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan – Presentation Ms. Turréy shared a presentation that summarized the goals, objectives, and work plan for the Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan that has recently commenced. She explained that there is a simultaneous but separate statewide Caltrans bike plan that is being prepared. The statewide plan focuses on policy while the District 4 plan focuses on projects and local goals. Caltrans has set a goal to triple bicycling by 2020. The District 4 Plan will prioritize bicycle projects around the state highway system and identify barriers to bicycling. Coordination with Sonoma County jurisdictions will be focused through the CBPAC. Public meetings will be planned across the region and online outreach will be heavily relied upon. The first step is to look at existing conditions. The SCTA is working with Caltrans staff to provide data on the current bicycle network.

8. Call for Projects – Caltrans Bike Plan and Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan – Discussion

A request for updated project lists for the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan was included in the agenda packet. Updates on completed, new, and changed projects are requested by the end of the calendar year. These updates will serve to update the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan project list and maps, as well as provide information for the Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan. Project lists were sent out to local bike planning staff individually.

Jurisdictions with projects in the Community Based Transportation Plans were also asked to provide status updates on these projects.

9. TDA3/TFCA Quarterly Report – Information Dana Turréy summarized the status of various active projects as of the end of the first quarter of FY 2017.

10. TDA3 Draft Score Card for FY17/18 Call for Projects – Discussion

Dana Turréy presented a draft scorecard with estimated TDA3 funds for each jurisdiction for consideration of projects. The final revised scorecard will be included in the call for projects, which will come out in early 2017.

11. ATP Cycle 3 State Grant Recommendations – Information

Dana Turréy pointed to a list of the recommended projects for the Statewide ATP Cycle 3 grant. The SMART Pathway segment in Petaluma is included on the list. None of the other Sonoma County projects submitted were recommended for the Statewide program. The separate Regional ATP program recommendations are expected to come out in December.

12. Other Business / Comments / Announcements Tina Panza announced that the Bicycle Coalition is looking for hosts for Family Bike Workshops from March through November 2017. If anyone is interested or knows someone with a suitable facility like a school or church with a large parking lot and access to bathrooms, please let Ms. Panza know.

13. Adjourn – ACTION 2:28 p.m.

490 Mendocino Ave. #206, Santa Rosa, CA| 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov

Staff Report

To: Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee

From: Dana Turrey, Transportation Planner

Item: CBPAC Officer Elections for 2017

Date: January 24, 2017

Issue:

Who shall serve as Chair and Vice Chair of the Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (CBPAC) for 2017?

Background:

The committee’s purpose is to provide technical assistance to the Sonoma County Transportation Authority (SCTA) related to bicycle and pedestrian planning and funding. The CBPAC meetings serve as a forum for the exchange of information about bicyclist and pedestrian issues and to coordinate efforts countywide.

Officers: SCTA’s Ordinance No.3 requires that a Chair and Vice Chair be elected at the first meeting of the year to lead the CBPAC during the calendar year. Officers must be members of the CBPAC. There are no other requirements or term limits.

Wendy Atkins, City of Sonoma staff member, has been Chair during 2011-2016 and has decided to step down from this role in 2017. Geoffrey Skinner, City of Sebastopol citizen member, has been Vice Chair during 2015-2016.

Nominations: Incumbent and/or additional nominations, including self-nomination, from the pool of members may be made for either office at the January meeting or earlier.

Organization: The officers elected in January are to accept responsibility for conducting the CBPAC meetings, as well as representing the CBPAC before the SCTA Board and at other venues as necessary.

Meetings: There are to be approximately six regular meetings of the CBPAC in 2017. Additional meetings may be scheduled, or meetings cancelled, according to need. Meetings are open to the public.

Membership: The membership of CBPAC is designated as up to twenty (20) members, based on the ten (10) jurisdictions of Sonoma County (the County and its nine city/town entities). Each jurisdiction may appoint a staff person and a resident representative. Regional and other agencies that may send representatives are considered ex-officio, non-voting members.

Voting: Each member, excluding non-voting members, shall have one vote on any matter to come before the committee for a vote. SCTA, however, recommends the CBPAC reach consensus on issues. If consensus is not reached, a minority opinion report can and should be made at the SCTA Board meeting if the issue is to go to the Board for a decision.

Action Requested:

Voting members are requested to elect a Chair and Vice-Chair for service on the CBPAC in 2017.

tel:707.565.5373

http://scta.ca.gov/

http://rcpa.ca.gov/


Staff Report To: Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee

From: Dana Turréy, Transportation Planner

Item: Complete Streets Checklist for Safe Routes to School Non-Infrastructure Program, One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG2)


Issue:

Shall the CBPAC approve the Complete Streets Checklist for the Safe Routes to School Non-Infrastructure Program through One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2?

Background:

In order to program Federal funding through MTC, it is regional policy that each project produce a Complete Streets Checklist, which must be reviewed and approved by a countywide Bicycle Committee prior to programming. The above referenced project is a safety and education program implemented through K-8 schools in Sonoma County. The referenced project does not include any bicycle or pedestrian facilities, or other infrastructure components.

Policy Impacts:

None

Fiscal Impacts:

None

Staff Recommendation:

Staff recommends that the CBPAC review and approve the attached Complete Streets Checklist for the Safe Routes to School Non-Infrastructure Program.

Attachment:

Complete Streets Checklist

tel:707.565.5373

http://scta.ca.gov/

http://rcpa.ca.gov/

1!&".2017 MTC I Ccmpleta streal8

@~' Wlloo1119 p. lfmem• u..,J1Medb) ( IRnam• Oaumy DwrwpgrMPn Aylln1!hrl/mpg-nQZ2lwllft ) I loo.., flwlem" '" ntmm

Ill.

Project: IH0 .. 1poqo4*I la.-1 lct1•I (1poo-I lirn:-rol 1-..-,.1

~ .. ,.......,,,.,,..I)~,,,,,,,...,,,,,,.,, Countywicle Safe Routes to Schools Program - 2017 (fprojectsl971l

Checklist Countywide Safe Routes to Schools Program - 2017

11 ----..---... - .... ., ..,.nllJ-ud..ion .. • ,_..or.., ,_.._.,.,.._orc_, _clleckall.,ll•t't'lr·

~--ID-...~·2017 .............. _.,_Edu __ ,.,. '1 M .... ooll '18olulm•~ -..-.....-ID-ht-_,....,......,_,..., .... ,.,, -qi_... 01 ll!aNld modMI ol._rtdltft ID -8.lbm-Omg,.,...JWw9m•tp--pw,., .. zg1z't41s! tT11 9oft-Cllr.illly Soaftl L 9. Gou• -1111•MflM:lio.c1*" 70~72

490 M!lndoc:il'll ~ua, Sua. 208 S.nlll -. CA lll5401

au.1 b11¥:1• pd-. au.1111..,...._ cta..lllbqde""'IM au.IVb~ ..,...too.. Rllllllcl~~ mc,ci.eo • .._ llqo:le portllng llld-lman OMlldeorbotll _ol _ _ .._.. ... -w..-. Ptllnlod canllct-Nllll'UW .......... poll!

............... -1n1111c ..... 11 --poclefttln.,. .......... llqo:le ""*--...... OI rol/IM ~Ill Ql'clt Hah-.....-111 ..... --11111111111 ~rt-r.-........... -.. ,_..., _on,.....

Trwllll-r Wllleulllln• Righi tum ontf la• • Trlnlllwihlclll ..... f'edlllrtln counldwntllln• ~ .... Otdnctlo•• ....... -G-1/4mle

111 ltl-- ••-1"1 p..i.otiton or bl.,.........._ _fllrhm..., pro,._ 1/4m'"11> 112 m'" Pl"J9d-MI• ......,..,.,.1111 ~1-.p and_....,., 112m'"11> 1 mlla

1+mlle

mpiuwad lllhlng ------..-.. -•tlrh-Wt1t_.....,or_l_cl!'*'" -1111·-Trlnlll-ADAl.aWllianedcull-

1c P-- _.,. 1111111--. ~,.,..., or11Ma111.....,.._n111n tlN pftlllct lllqode poiMng

·---•rt1Mpulill9hew- n.ftlallan•l8llllO-•blofd•

hUp:/lcompl8'8etreels.mtc.ca.p/checklists/1141

-fthitulartnllllc19'1I.,,... .-.idrMe1•11-"'*'9or 1111141 npedollrtan r:tr1111¥* RR..-ig1

ei•nidclonbuWldonodar-...ior.....ingo Rlom.,.....llpll-Rlghl tum ontf Ian• -1bl9 lo• Coun~ ,,,.,..,,,

113

1/6/2017

1• What exlatlng challeng• could the prupoMd prvJect 1~- torblcyele,

plldeatrlan, ortninalt tniv.l In the vicinity of the propOffd project?

""'"

Wh.t trip g1111anitors (nlstlng and futurs) .,. In the vicinity of the proposed 2a project that might attract -lklng or bicycling cuetomers, emplopN, student.,

vlaltoni or olhars?

""'"

MTC I Canplele Slreels unrwp!JIJljlY11J 1111j1m11s w 1.11i;:yc1R Lack of bk:ycie parking Freeway on-ofl' rempa Narrow curb lllnas Clloke points RR crossings No blka raeka on busas Wide roadway crossings Long signal cycles whldl requhl pedeetrtans to -It long parloda of time Short signal croeuing time9 Narrow undercrouhgs, ovara'Ollings Slip lanes Sidewalk obstruction or missing sldewalk Pedeatrtan-leval lighting Lack of ADA complant faclltlee Lack ofTranlJil vehicle sloPlil

Educatlonal Institutions Transit 818.tlons Senior centers High-denaily lllnd u.,.,__ Shopping areas Medlclll centers Major public venuas Government bulldlnp ......

38 Han you consldaNd colllslons lnvoMng blcycllsts and pedestrians dong the No route of the fllclllty?

If llO, pl-• prvvlde the nunMrof colllalona and de11erlbe Iha outcon.. of each:

If so, what Naourcu hava you consulted?

48 Do anr lldopted plans call for the d11Hlopmant of blcycla or pedestrian tacllltln on, crossing or adjacent to the proposlld facllltylproject.?

""'" le the propoHd project canal.tent with th- plane?

Sa Do any IOGlll, .tatewlda or fedend pollcl• call for lm::orponi.tlng blqrde .,.dlor pedestrian fllcllltlas Into this project?

""'" If llO, have the pollcln been followed?

lib NIA

Sc If this project Includes a bicycle andforpedutl'llln faclllty, which applle11bla dnlgn slllndarcla orguldellnn h.ve b•n followed?

Wh.t: comments have bean made nigardlng blcycla and pedutrtan

City or town bicycle plan Countywlde bicycle plan City or town padeliltrian plan Countywide pad811bian plan Combined bicycle and pedeslrian plan ADA transition pllln General plan Spaclncplan Regional tranlilportatlon Plan Salee tax expenditure plan Station area eCC8119 plan No plans

NIA

Caltran9 Deputy Directive 84 Caltranlil Highway Design Manuel {Chapter 1000)

ACR211

MlJTCD2003 MlJTCD Calfomla supplement Amerk:anlil with Dllilablllllelil Ad Aece9slblllty Guldalinee (ADMG) MTC Pedelillrlan Dllillrtcla study None ~N

NIA

No

No

AASliTO bicycle and pedestrian design guides Amerk:anlil with Dllilablllllelil Ad Acces&lblllty Guldallnas Caltrans Deelgn Information Buliedn 89 Caltrane Highway Delillgn Manual Caltranlil Cdfomia MUTCD Caltran9 PedeWian end Bicyda Facililielil in California FHWAMUTCD

ITE Designing Urban W811able Thoroughfares NACTO Urban~ Design Gulde NIA· no bicycle or pedestrtan faclltles Included Nona

la accommodation• at BPAC, llU.kllholder, or publlc IM8tlnga Ill which the proposed NIA project hn been dlscuned?

htlpJ/canpletestreets.mtc.ca.gov/checklis1s/1141 213

1/6l2017

How hfta you rMponded lo colnnM!lte recetnd?

la Wl111t KCOinnodlltlona, If •ny, • .., lnclud•d for blcydl.ta •nd padHl~•na In th• p1Dpo- p1DjKI dulgn?

Oth•r

MTC I Can plate Streets

Nona, uyat.

Ci111a I blcyclo paths Cla• II bicycle lenM ci. .. Ill blcyde route& ClalOl\lbikewayo Bicycle bmcao Raioad oaparalad biim'Mlys

BicycleBoul8vatds Bicycle par1dng Sidewalks on one - or both aldM of_ Widened 1ld8Wlllk11 Ma_r;ro_lkll Pn:Jtactad intermction Painted connict zonM Narrow unpawd palh Ped-n .... clllllllld traffic algnala or routine pedoatrlan cycle Bult><>ut Bicycle acti.Jalad tniftlc algnala or routine blcycllat cycle High Ylelblllly CltJlllWlllke Ped-n- lighting .ADA-a:lmpliant ramp1

Traftlc signal push buttons Rell.Jge lalandl on roadways

Tranelt 1heltlln Wide curb lanes Right tum only lenM Tnmaitvahicleo!Dpa Pad81bi&n countdown signals

W.y.ftndlng or dlrectlon1l slg1111ge None

None, thl8 I• a non-lnfraatructurw pn:ag,.m.

la Wiii th• p1Dp011ad p1Djacl "'""'- •n al.ting blc:yci. or pad-•n f11cHtt,. or block No or hind• blCJcl• or plldutrt1111 mownwnt?

If yu, pl-• dMcrtb9 allu.tlon In detall.

If th• PIDPGMd PIDl•ct lncoipo,.1 .. nelthw bicycle nor INld-n flcllltl .. , or If lb the PIDP""ad project -uld hinder bl(:ycle or INld-•n 1-1, 11.t "'aeon• why NIA

the proJitet cennot b9 reodMlgnad lo accommodat8 the•• facllltlea.

What would b9 Illa coat of th• •d- blC)'Cle andlorped-n faclln,.?

If tho propoMd prol•ct lncoipo,.loo blcycle or ped .. t~an lmp...,,_n .. , what p1Dpolllon I• th• blc:yci. andh>rpo1d-n f•clltt,. of Illa tot.I p1Djacl coat?

11 rlght-of..way challeng ..... Iha IHSOn for th• hlnd .. nce, pll ... aplaln the an•lyala thal lod to this con..,•lon.

la H-wlll IO<teQ for blqdl.ta and padHl~ana b9 maintained du~ng projact con.tructlan?

NIA

NIA

AltamalMI algned blcycle roule AlternaM oigned ped-an roule Sepa- ped-an pathway

oth•r

Other NIA

1 OaWhat agency wlll be ... ponalbi. for ongoing rnolnlenance of th• facllltr? NIA

.,. __ San F...,..oo, CA94105

Edit GbPGklwt Clcbeckljlil{1141 ledjU 11 P.lete chectJiR UctJgkljltaM 141 l

Pl'IOllC415.719..871XI ........ '1'1 Cnalp~Qf!?Op!p 9' goy>

http://completestreets.mtc.ca.gov/checkl is1s/1141

02017MTC

313


Staff Report To: Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee / Planning Advisory Committee

From: Dana Turrey, Transportation Planner

Item: Complete Streets Checklists for Proposed One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG2) Projects


Issue:

Review Complete Streets Checklists of the various applications for One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 funding and provide comments to SCTA prior to or at the Planning Advisory Committee Meeting on February 16, 2017.

Background:

As part of Regional Complete Streets (and Routine Accommodation of Pedestrian and Bicyclists) Policy, project applicants for One Bay Area Grant Cycle 2 (OBAG2) funding are required to fill out a Complete Streets Checklist on the MTC website that is available for all members of the public, but in particular, members of the county’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committees to review prior to consideration by the SCTA Board of Directors.

All OBAG2 applicants have created checklists associated with their proposed projects and those projects are available for review at: http://completestreets.mtc.ca.gov/. Once at this website, at the left hand side of the page there is a search engine with pull down menus. Search for Sonoma County Projects for the years 2016 and 2017 (the years should be searched separately, there is no way to search for both years at the same time). This should provide you with a complete list of projects currently under consideration. By selecting each individual project, you will be taken to another link where the checklist may be selected. The project titles, in no particular order, are as follows:

Project Title Project Sponsor Petaluma Boulevard South Road Diet Petaluma Caufield Roadway Rehabilitation Petaluma Lakeville Complete Street - E. Washington to Petaluma Blvd N. Petaluma Windsor River Rd at Windsor Rd Intersection Windsor Bodega Avenue Bike Lanes and Pavement Rehabilitation Sebastopol Pavement Rehabilitation of Various Streets in Santa Rosa Santa Rosa Highway 101 Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge (Design Only) Santa Rosa Class II Bicycle Lane Gap Closures and Pedestrian Gap Closure Santa Rosa E Cotati Avenue Street Rehab Project Cotati SMART Pathway - Payran to Southpoint, Petaluma SMART SMART Rail crossing Improvements - Windsor River Rd at Windsor Rd. SMART SMART Pathway - West Steele Ln to San Miguel, Santa Rosa SMART

tel:707.565.5373

http://scta.ca.gov/

http://rcpa.ca.gov/

http://completestreets.mtc.ca.gov/

Project Title Project Sponsor 2019 Rehab Various Streets in Sonoma County SC TPW Crocker Bridge Bike and Pedestrian Passage SC TPW Pavement Rehab of River Road (FAS) SC TPW Joe Rodota Trail Bridges Replacement (PCA) SC RP Fryer Creek Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge Sonoma City 2019 Rehab of Various Streets in Rohnert Park Rohnert Park Healdsburg Avenue Complete Streets Improvements Healdsburg

Policy Impacts:

None

Fiscal Impacts:

All projects have been submitted for consideration of OBAG 2 funding.

Staff Recommendation:

Staff recommends that committee members navigate to the above mentioned website and review each of the projects and provide comments on said projects to SCTA staff at or before the Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) meeting on February 16, 2017 at 9:00 a.m. Comments can be submitted by email to Dana Turrey at [email protected] or in person at the PAC meeting on February 16, 2017.

mailto:[email protected]


Staff Report To: SCTA Technical Advisory Committee


Item: Quarterly Status Report of TDA3 and TFCA Projects –FY 2017 Q2


Issue:

This report provides the status of TDA3 and TFCA projects not yet fully expended as of December 31, 2016.

Background:

Transportation Development Act, Article 3 (TDA3) Projects

Jurisdiction Project ID Programmed Amount

Funds Expended

Funds Remaining

Funds Expire

Santa Rosa SMART Crossing at Jennings 16-0010-01 $503,313.00 $0.00 $503,313.00 6/30/2018

Santa Rosa Montecito Boulevard Bike Enhancements 17-0010-01

$40,000 $0.00 $40,000 6/30/2019

Santa Rosa Citywide Green Bike Lane Transition Enhancements 17-0010-02

$78,000 $0.00 $78,000 6/30/2019

Santa Rosa Citywide Pedestrian Enhancements 17-0010-03

$47,000 $0.00 $47,000 6/30/2019

Sonoma County - TPW

Bicycle Safety Education Campaign 17-0010-04

$50,000 $0.00 $50,000 6/30/2019

Sonoma County - RP

West County Trail – Forestville 17-0010-05

$200,000 $0.00 $200,000 6/30/2019

Sebastopol Class 2 and 3 - Local Streets, Class 2 - SR 116 17-0010-06

$8,842 $0.00 $8,842 6/30/2019

Project costs must be incurred prior to the TDA3 expiration date (typically June 30). Sponsors must submit invoices no later than August 31 for any funds expiring June 30. Please submit invoices to MTC (Cheryl Chi [email protected]) and copy SCTA (Dana Turréy [email protected]).

tel:707.565.5373

http://scta.ca.gov/

http://rcpa.ca.gov/



Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) Projects, County Program Manager Fund

Jurisdiction Project ID Programmed Amount

Funds Expended

Funds Remaining

Funds Expire

Sonoma County Transit (Sebastopol)

Sebastopol Bus Stop Improvements 14-SON-05 $75,000.00 $8,630.00 $66,370.00 4/30/2017

Windsor Protective-Permissive Left Turn Phasing 15-SON-05 $132,941.84 $42,654.90 $90,286.94 12/19/2017

Santa Rosa Free Rider Trip Reduction Incentive Program 16-SON-01 $230,892.00 $196,631.80 $34,260.20 10/26/2017

Sonoma County Transit Transit Marketing Program 16-SON-02 $ 140,199.00 $65,189.38 $75,009.62 10/26/2017 Petaluma Transit Transit Marketing Program 16-SON-04 $64,006.00 $38,283.12 $25,722.88 10/26/2017

Petaluma Traffic Signal Coordination Timing Project 16-SON-05 $100,000.00 $0 $ 100,000.00 10/26/2017

Santa Rosa CityBus

Trip Reduction Incentive Programs 17-SON-01 $234,670.00 $0 $234,670.00 12/08/2018

Santa Rosa Public Works

Public Access EV Chargers, Courthouse Square 17-SON-02 $25,000.00 $0 $25,000.00 12/08/2018

Sonoma County Transit Transit Marketing 17-SON-03 $71,265.00 $0 $71,265.00 12/08/2018 Sonoma County Transit

Airport Business Park Shuttle 17-SON-04 $70,000.00 $0 $70,000.00 12/08/2018

Sebastopol Public Works

Local Streets Bicycle Gap Closures 17-SON-05 $50,000.00 $0 $50,000.00 12/08/2018

Petaluma Transit Youth Bus Pass Subsidy 17-SON-06 $13,000.00 $0 $13,000.00 12/08/2018 Petaluma Transit Transit Marketing 17-SON-07 $67,731.00 $0 $67,731.00 12/08/2018 Petaluma Transit Transit Signal Priority 17-SON-08 $52,724.26 $0 $52,724.26 12/08/2018

Final Reports for TFCA projects completed before December 31, 2016 will be due to SCTA in May 2017.

Please submit all TFCA invoices by June 24 for any expenses incurred in that fiscal year.

Recommendation:

Please contact Dana Turréy at [email protected] with any questions or corrections.


490 Mendocino Ave. #206, Santa Rosa, CA | 707.565.5373 | scta.ca.gov | rcpa.ca.gov

Memorandum

To: Eligible Applicants


Re: Transportation Development Act, Article 3, Call for Projects FY 2017-2018


APPLICATIONS DUE BY 5:00 P.M. ON MARCH 17, 2017

Call for Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects:

All eligible jurisdictions are invited to submit projects for the Transportation Development Act, Article 3 Program. Please see the attached “scorecard” showing funds available to each eligible entity.

Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds are generated from a statewide ¼ cent sales tax. Article 3 of TDA (TDA3) is a set-aside of approximately 2% of those funds for bicycle and pedestrian planning and projects. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) administers TDA3, which is distributed based on population. The TDA3 program manager at MTC is Cheryl Chi.

Sonoma County’s incorporated cities/town and the County of Sonoma are eligible to apply. Each year an annual fund estimate (entitlement) is developed for each jurisdiction based on population, with unused entitlements allowed to accumulate from year to year as “credit.” A jurisdiction’s claim for any given year is not allowed to exceed the amount equal to the accumulated credit plus the following two years of projected entitlement. This mechanism allows jurisdictions to gather sufficient amounts, from past and future entitlements, to fund projects. Programming in any given year, however, cannot exceed the sum of the total revenues available to Sonoma County as a whole.

TDA3 funds may be used for bicycle lanes, bicycle and pedestrian paths, and related planning and marketing efforts. There are no matching requirements with this funding source. Projects are required to meet Caltrans safety design criteria and CEQA requirements; be completed within three years; be maintained; be consistent with adopted bicycle plans; and be authorized by a city/town council or county board.

Projects are recommended by existing city, town and county bicycle and pedestrian advisory committees (BPACs).

tel:707.565.5373

http://scta.ca.gov/

http://rcpa.ca.gov/

FY 2017-2018 TDA3 Schedule: January 17 SCTA issues TDA3 Call for Projects

March 17 Deadline for TDA3 Project Application Forms and any required environmental documentation, project maps, or supplemental materials to be submitted to Dana Turrey at [email protected]

March 28 CBPAC to review project proposals and make recommendation to Board Project sponsors are requested to attend this meeting

April 24 Deadline for project sponsor’s council or board adopted resolutions Please send to Dana Turrey: [email protected]

May 8 SCTA Board considers CBPAC recommendations and approves the 2017/2018 TDA3 Program of Projects

End of May Approved TDA3 Program of Projects and required supporting documentation submitted to MTC by SCTA

May / June MTC reviews SCTA submittal

July 1 Funds available for approved projects

Attachments: • TDA3 Scorecard – Estimated funding available for programming in FY 17/18 • TDA3 Model Resolution and Project Application Form • MTC’s Resolution 4108 (June 26, 2013)

Please direct questions to Dana Turréy: [email protected] or 707-565-5376.



TDA 3 FUNDING ESTIMATE FOR FY 2017/2018

Cloverdale Cotati Healdsburg Petaluma Rohnert Park Santa Rosa Sebastopol Sonoma Windsor County Total

2016 Population 8,825 7,153 11,699 60,375 42,003 175,667 7,527 10,865 27,031 150,814 501,959

Population Percentage 1.76% 1.43% 2.33% 12.03% 8.37% 35.00% 1.50% 2.16% 5.39% 30.05% 100%

Carryover $65,476 $71,903 $78,349 $24,374 $233,635 $32,631 $386 $38,277 $118,497 $62,011 725,538$

Estimated New Apportionment $8,026 $6,505 $10,640 $54,908 $38,200 $159,762 $6,845 $9,881 $24,584 $137,159 456,510$

Estimate for FY 2017/18 $73,502 $78,408 $88,989 $79,283 $271,835 $192,392 $7,231 $48,159 $143,081 $199,169 $1,182,048

Caltrans District 4 | 1

Caltrans District 4 Bicycle Plan: Vision, Goals, & Objectives

2 | Caltrans District 4

Caltrans District 4 Bike Plan – Vision, Goals, and Objectives

Caltrans District 4 | 3

Emphasis Areas for District 4 Bicycle Plan

Metropolitan Transportation Commission Programming and Allocations Committee

January 11, 2017 Item Number 4a

Resolution No. 4218, Revised

Subject: Cycle 3 Regional Active Transportation Program (ATP) of Projects

Background: The State established the Active Transportation Program (ATP) in September 2013. The ATP funding is distributed as follows: 50% to the state for a statewide competitive program (“Statewide

Competitive ATP”); 10% to the small urban and rural area competitive program to be

managed by the state; and 40% to the large urbanized area competitive program, with funding

distributed by population and managed by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (“Regional ATP”).

MTC is responsible for developing the region’s guidelines for the

Regional ATP, and for submitting the proposed projects to the California Transportation Commission (CTC) for adoption. CTC approved MTC’s Regional ATP Guidelines in March 2016, and applications for the Regional Program were due to MTC on June 15, 2016. Roughly $22 million is available for programming under the Cycle 3 Regional ATP. MTC staff’s recommended regional project awards and recommended contingency projects are listed in Attachment 1. Statewide Competitive ATP Results The CTC adopted the Statewide Competitive ATP list of projects on December 7, 2016. The approved Bay Area projects are listed in Attachment 2. CTC funded six projects in the MTC region for a total of $32 million, out of a statewide program of $132 million (24%). Revised ATP Regional Share Targets and Schedule The CTC approved a revised ATP Fund Estimate in October that adds funding from federal sources and the State Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. This amount was distributed among all three ATP subprograms. The revised amount provides $1.5 million in additional funds to the MTC program, and allows MTC to program $22.2 million in the 2017 Regional ATP. This is reflected in MTC Resolution No. 4218, Revised, Attachment A, Appendix A-2. Further, MTC staff proposes to update the ATP schedule, which is included in the same resolution as Appendix A-1. Regional Project Selection Process MTC received 61 applications totaling about $166 million in response to the Regional ATP Call for Projects. Of these, Caltrans deemed one project in San Francisco ineligible for ATP funds due to scope. MTC enlisted a 18-member multi-disciplinary evaluation committee to score and rank the remaining applications (see Attachment 3). The review committee used the same evaluation form and scoring criteria from Statewide Competitive ATP, plus an additional 10 maximum points for regional priorities, for a maximum point score of 110.

Programming and Allocations Committee Item 4a January 11, 2017 Page 2 of 3

Each application was assigned to a team of three members of the evaluation committee. In order to ensure an objective review, staff assigned applications to evaluators from another county when possible, and evaluators did not review applications from their own agency. Each evaluator independently scored the applications, then met with the team to agree on a consensus score. Staff ranked all responsive applications from highest to lowest based on the consensus score. Staff recommends fully funding 13 projects and partially funding one project for a total of $22.2 million. This figure includes 9 projects requesting less than $1 million to meet MTC’s 20% funding target for smaller projects. Staff also recommends adoption of a list of contingency projects totaling $18 million, ranked in order based on the project’s evaluation score. MTC would fund projects on the contingency list should there be any project failures, ineligibility determinations, or savings in the Cycle 3 Regional ATP. The recommended projects are listed in Attachment 1. Note that 94% of regional ATP funding as proposed would benefit Communities of Concern, greatly exceeding the 25% target. While there is no regional target for Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS) projects, 79% of regional ATP funding would benefit SRTS type projects.

Issues: 1. Tie Score: Both SFMTA’s Vision Zero Safer Intersection project and Suisun City’s McCoy Creek Trail project scored 87.0. In order to break the tie score, staff examined three score metrics, based on State and Regional ATP Guidelines and sub-element scores, and determined Suisun City’s project scored higher.

2. Partial Funding: The McCoy Creek Trail project sponsored by Suisun City requested $4.1 million in ATP funds; however, only $1.8 million of ATP remains after funding higher-scoring projects. Therefore, staff recommends partially funding the McCoy Creek Trail project at $1.8 million. Should Suisun City not be able to scale the project to deliver the full project benefits, or to fully fund the project using other funds, staff recommends funding projects on the contingency list to fully program the remaining $1.8 million.

3. Caltrans Eligibility Determination Pending: Caltrans performed an initial examination of scope eligibility and deliverability for all projects applying for ATP funds, and found that a number of projects have potential issues. Once MTC releases its staff recommendations, Caltrans will begin a more in-depth review of eligibility and deliverability, and will work with the affected project sponsors. Therefore, it is important for sponsors to note that MTC’s proposed funding amounts are not final, and are subject to this review. Following review and agreement, MTC and CTC may amend the project descriptions and funding amounts.

Programming and Allocations Committee Item 4a January 11, 2017 Page 3 of 3

4. Improvements for Cycle 4: Between the Statewide and Regional ATP, every Bay Area county received at least one project from Cycle 3. However, the funding amounts in the regional program very significantly by county, especially for the two largest counties in the Bay Area. State law requires MTC to hold a competitive process to determine the funding program, and does not allow for geographic guarantees in the competitive process. Further, with 100% of Statewide ATP funding benefiting Disadvantaged Communities, and 94% of Regional ATP funding benefiting Communities of Concern, it is clear that projects not benefiting DACs/COCs are at a distinct disadvantage competing for ATP funds. In light of these results in Cycle 3, staff will consider the following options in developing the Cycle 4 Regional Program Guidelines (in no particular order):

Reduce or eliminate additional points for Disadvantaged Communities, while ensuring the 25% statutory target is met;

Reduce or eliminate 20% funding set-aside for projects requesting under $1 million;

Increase the points assigned to regional priorities; Delegate scoring of “regional priorities” section of application to

MTC staff, rather than the review teams; Revise evaluation process to allow for a second level review for

the highest scoring third or half of applications; Cap the number of applications a sponsor can submit; Cap the number of projects for which a sponsor can receive ATP

funds; Cap the amount of ATP funds a sponsor can receive; and Institute a maximum funding request amount by project and/or

sponsor.

MTC anticipates the Cycle 4 process to begin in 2018. Staff will consult with stakeholders on any changes to the scoring process and will return to this committee for approval of any revised review process.

Recommendation: Refer MTC Resolution No. 4218, Revised to the Commission for

approval, and direct staff to transmit the recommended project list to the CTC.

Attachments: Attachment 1: Recommended 2017 Regional ATP Program of Projects and

Contingency Projects Attachment 2: Approved Statewide ATP Projects in the Bay Area Attachment 3: List of Project Evaluators Attachment 4: 2017 Regional ATP List Applications Received – Scores

MTC Resolution No. 4218, Revised: Attachment A, Appendices A-1 and A-2, and Attachment B

J:\PROJECT\Funding\T4-MAP21\MAP21 - TAP and ATP\ATP\Regional ATP\2017 rATP (Cycle 3)\Draft Res 4218\tmp-4218.docx

Attachment 1 Agenda Item 4a

Page 1

Attachment 1: Recommended 2017 Regional ATP Program of Projects (Alphabetical Order)

County Sponsor Project

Requested Amount ($1,000s) Project Description

Alameda Alameda County Public Works

Active Oakland Comprehensive SRTS Program (Non-Infrastructure)

$977 Active Oakland will provide a range of program services and activities for participating schools, including: educational seminars, enhanced traffic safety patrols, participatory activities (e.g. Golden Sneaker contests), and participatory learning and program leadership/design amongst middle schoolers. The project goal is to increase walking or biking by 15%.


Fairview Elementary School SRTS (Final Design Only)

$542 The D Street Safe Routes to School project will reduce injuries as well as increase walking & biking along D St. between Fairview Ave. & Hayward City Limits by installing sidewalks, curbs, gutters and crosswalks.


Somerset Ave School Corridor SRTS (Final Design Only)

$330 The Somerset Ave. School Corridor SRTS project will increase walking & biking, as well as reduce injuries along Somerset Ave. between Stanton Ave. and Redwood Rd. by installing sidewalks, curbs, gutters, crosswalks, and Class III bicycle routes.


Lewelling Blvd SRTS (Final Design Only)

$400 The Lewelling Bl. Safe Routes to School project will increase walking and biking, as well as reduce injuries along Lewelling Bl. between Meekland Ave. and E. 14th St. by installing sidewalks, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and Class II bike lanes.

Alameda Berkeley SRTS Improvements - John Muir Elementary

$270 Address speeding and lack of vehicle yielding at a school crossing where recent collisions have occurred by installing speed feedback signs along Claremont south of Ashby (SR 13) and crossing improvements at Claremont Crescent, including RRFBs, signs, curb bulb-outs, and better pedestrian lighting.

Alameda Emeryville Bike/Ped Greenway Safety & Connectivity Improvement Project

$265 The Emeryville Bicycle & Pedestrian Greenway Safety & Mobility Improvement Project will improve Emeryville’s existing Greenway trail crossings at 65th, 66th, and 67th with raised crosswalks, RRFBs, parking adjustments and signage. The project will also add a bike share station to the existing regional bike share network and bike/ped counter.

Contra Costa

Contra Costa County Public Works

Fred Jackson Way First Mile/ Last Mile Connection

$3,298 Construct ADA accessible sidewalks with street trees along 0.3-mile roadway from Grove Avenue to Wildcat Creek Trail. Extend an additional 0.3 miles northerly to Brookside Drive to construct sidewalk and Class II bike lanes, for a total of 0.6 miles of continuous pedestrian and bicycle access.


Page 2



Contra Costa

Contra Costa County Public Works

Pacheco Blvd Sidewalk Gap Closure Phase 3

$619 Construct a pedestrian path and bike lane gap closure to connect residents east of Vine Hill Creek to Las Juntas Elementary School. This work will require a concrete box culvert extension at Vine Hill Creek. An additional 65-foot sidewalk gap east of Vine Hill Creek will also be closed.

Marin San Rafael Francisco Blvd East Avenue Bridge Bike Ped Connectivity

$4,025 Promote pedestrian/bicyclist’s safety and connectivity by: widening existing sidewalk and constructing a pedestrian/bicyclist bridge over the Canal Waterway and a sidewalk on the west side of Grand Avenue, installing ADA-compliant curb ramps, providing crosswalk enhancements, restriping roadway to accommodate widened sidewalk, providing streetlights and minor landscaping.

Napa City of Napa SR 29 Bike/Ped Undercrossing $531 To construct a Class I multiuse trail along the northern bank of Napa Creek, providing a needed connection across SR29 for bicyclists and pedestrians that is safe and convenient to use. This gap closure project will link the existing active transportation infrastructure network on either side of SR29.

San Francisco

SFMTA Powell Street Safety Project $4,400 The Powell Street Safety Project will improve Powell Street between Ellis and Post, and will improve pedestrian safety and reduce sidewalk crowding to encourage more people to walk, especially to jobs. Moreover, it provides significant benefits to the over 20,000 at-risk residents that live in the community.

San Mateo Woodside Woodside Elementary School Student Pathway Phase 3

$528 The project creates a separated, 6-foot-wide pathway for Woodside Elementary School students traveling to and from school along SR 84, paves the road shoulder for cyclists and extends an improvement project currently underway, connecting the school to Woodside's commercial center.

Solano Vallejo Bay Trail/Vine Trail Gap Closure

$4,216 The Bay Trail/Vine Trail Gap Closure Project will construct Class I and Class II gap closures along the Bay Trail and Vine Trail regional networks in the City of Vallejo from the Vallejo Ferry Terminal north to the City of American Canyon.


Page 3



Solano Suisun City McCoy Creek Trail (Partial Funding)

$1,770 Install a concrete Class I bikeway, a pedestrian/bike bridge, fencing, railing, site furnishings, monument entrance signs, wayfinding signs, educational kiosk signs, roadway signs, striping, chokers, rectangular rapid flashing beacons, utility infrastructure, landscaping and shaded vista areas.

Total $22,171

Staff Recommendations for MTC 2017 Regional ATP – Contingency List (Line indicates split between Large and Small projects)

MTC Score County Sponsor Project

Requested Amount ($1,000s)

87.0 Solano Suisun City McCoy Creek Trail *Remaining Amount* $2,367 87.0 San Francisco SFMTA Vision Zero SF Safer Intersections $2,002 85.0 Contra Costa Concord Downtown Corridors Bike/Ped Improvement $3,718 84.3 San Mateo San Carlos Route 101 Holly Street Bike Ped Overcrossing $4,200 84.0 Alameda Oakland Oakland SRTS: Crossing to Safety $3,714

77.0 Napa Napa County Office of Education

Napa County SRTS $437

74.7 Alameda Alameda County Public Works

Royal Ave SRTS $456

74.0 Alameda Berkeley SRTS Improvements for Oxford & Jefferson Elementary Schools

$267

74.0 Contra Costa Pittsburg Pittsburg Active Transportation & Safe Routes Plan (WalkBikePittsburg2035)

$312

71.0 Alameda Alameda County Public Works

Proctor Elementary School SRTS $600

Total $18,073


Page 1

Attachment 2 CTC Approved 2017 Statewide ATP Projects in the Bay Area

County Agency Description

Funded Amount

($1,000s) Alameda Alameda, City of Central Avenue Complete Street Project $7,326

Alameda Oakland 14th Street: Safe Routes in the City $10,578

Alameda Oakland Fruitvale Alive Gap Closure Project $5,850 Santa Clara Sunnyvale Sunnyvale SNAIL Neighborhood Active

Transportation Connectivity Improvements $4,847

Solano Fairfield East Tabor/Tolenas Safe Routes to School Gap Closure Project

$1,700

Sonoma SMART SMART Pathway - Petaluma (Payran to Southpoint)

$1,461

Total $31,762 J:\PROJECT\Funding\T4-MAP21\MAP21 - TAP and ATP\ATP\Regional ATP\2017 rATP (Cycle 3)\Draft Res 4218\tmp-4218.docx


Page 1

Attachment 3

Metropolitan Transportation Commission 2017 Regional Active Transportation Program - Cycle 3

List of Project Evaluators

Affiliation Description ABAG Bay Trail Project Recreational Trails AC Transit Transit California Walks Safe Routes to School/ Pedestrian

Safety Castro Valley Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee

Bike & Pedestrian Safety

ChangeLab Solutions Public Health City of Menlo Park City; Public Health City of San Ramon City City of Santa Rosa City San Mateo City/County Association of Governments

Congestion Management Agency

Contra Costa Transportation Authority Congestion Management Agency County of Marin County Public Works Metropolitan Transportation Commission (1) Metropolitan Planning Organization Metropolitan Transportation Commission (2) Metropolitan Planning Organization MTC Policy Advisory Council Policy Advisory Council/ Public Health Petaluma Transit Transit Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (1) Congestion Management Agency Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (2) Congestion Management Agency San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency City/Transit (Sustainable Streets)

Attachment 4Metropolitan Transportation Commission2017 Regional Active Transportation Program ‐ Cycle 3

List of Applications Received ‐ Scores (Descending Score Order)

Color KeyWhite on Black: Projects Funded by the Statewide ATPBlack on Green: Projects Recommended in the Regional ATPBlack Strikeout on White: Withdrawn or Ineligible Project

Co Agency Project TitleTotalProject

Cost ($1,000s)

TotalFund

Request ($1,000s)

MTC Reg'l Score

MRN San Rafael Francisco Blvd East Avenue Bridge Bike Ped Connectivity 7,358$ 4,025$ 97.0ALA Alameda County Public Works Active Oakland Comprehensive SRTS Program 977$ 977$ 96.0CCC Contra Costa County Public Works Fred Jackson Way First Mile/ Last Mile Connection 4,298$ 3,298$ 95.3SOL Vallejo Bay Trail/Vine Trail Gap Closure 5,218$ 4,216$ 93.0ALA Oakland Fruitvale Alive Gap Closure Project 8,241$ 5,850$ 92.7SON SMART SMART Pathway‐ Petaluma Payran to Southpoint 3,272$ 1,461$ 92.0ALA Alameda County Public Works Fairview Elementary School SRTS 3,366$ 542$ 92.0ALA Alameda County Public Works Somerset Ave School Corridor SRTS 3,652$ 330$ 90.0ALA Oakland 14th St Safe Routes in the City 13,939$ 10,578$ 89.7SF SFMTA Powell Street Safety Project 9,309$ 4,400$ 89.7ALA Berkeley SRTS Improvements ‐ John Muir Elementary 336$ 270$ 88.7SOL Suisun City McCoy Creek Trail (Partial Funding Recommended, $1,770k) 4,287$ 4,137$ 87.0SF SFMTA Vision Zero SF Safer Intersections 2,062$ 2,002$ 87.0ALA Alameda, City of Central Avenue Complete Street Project 12,471$ 7,326$ 86.0SOL Fairfield East Tabor/Tolenas SRTS Gap Closure 1,860$ 1,700$ 85.0CCC Concord Downtown Corridors Bike/Ped Improvement 4,349$ 3,718$ 85.0SM Woodside Woodside Elementary School Student Pathway Phase 3 745$ 528$ 84.7ALA Alameda County Public Works Lewelling Blvd SRTS 3,065$ 400$ 84.7SM San Carlos Route 101 Holly Street Bike Ped Overcrossing 5,250$ 4,200$ 84.3ALA Oakland Oakland SRTS: Crossing to Safety 4,071$ 3,714$ 84.0CCC Contra Costa County Public Works Pacheco Blvd Sidewalk Gap Closure Phase 3 1,239$ 619$ 83.3MRN Corte Madera Central Marin Regional Pathways Gap Closure 2,968$ 2,626$ 82.7NAP Napa, City of SR 29 Bike/Ped Undercrossing 742$ 531$ 82.0

Date Printed: 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 3



Cost ($1,000s)

TotalFund

Request ($1,000s)

MTC Reg'l Score

ALA ACTC I‐80 Gilman Interchange Bike/Ped Over‐crossing & Access Improvements 33,016$ 8,418$ 82.0SF SFMTA Play Streets Pilot SF 545$ 485$ 81.7SON Sonoma County/Cloverdale Crocker Bridge Bike Ped Passage 2,292$ 1,946$ 81.0SCL Sunnyvale Sunnyvale SNAIL Neighborhood Active Transportation Connectivity Program 6,059$ 4,847$ 80.0ALA Emeryville Bike/Ped Greenway Safety & Connectivity Improvement Project 330$ 265$ 80.0ALA Berkeley Sacramento Street Complete Streets Improvements 1,814$ 1,542$ 79.3ALA Oakland West Grand Ave 10,929$ 8,676$ 79.0SCL Sunnyvale Sunnyvale SRTS 2,362$ 1,889$ 79.0SF SFMTA Geneva Avenue Bike Ped Safety Improvement 9,987$ 2,350$ 78.0SCL Santa Clara VTA Montague Expressway Ped Overcrossing at Milpitas BART 12,818$ 5,000$ 77.7NAP Napa County Office of Education Napa County SRTS 542$ 437$ 77.0CCC Contra Costa County Public Works Appian Way Complete Streets 12,182$ 10,265$ 77.0SF San Francisco PW Jefferson Street Improvements Phase 2 14,847$ 9,024$ 76.0ALA Fremont Walnut Ave Complete Street Improvement 5,864$ 5,189$ 75.0ALA Alameda County Public Works Royal Ave SRTS 636$ 456$ 74.7ALA Berkeley SRTS Improvements for Oxford & Jefferson Elementary Schools 302$ 267$ 74.0CCC Pittsburg Pittsburg Active Transportation & Safe Routes Plan (WalkBikePittsburg2035) 312$ 312$ 74.0SM Belmont Belmont and San Carlos 4 Corners School Safety Corridor Improvements 2,781$ 2,031$ 73.0ALA Piedmont Ped Safety and Bike Lane Implementation 3,313$ 2,933$ 73.0SCL Palo Alto San Antonio Ave Enhanced Bikeway 2,180$ 1,744$ 72.7CCC Pittsburg Railroad Ave Multi‐Use Trail 1,766$ 1,546$ 72.0ALA Alameda County Public Works Proctor Elementary School SRTS 6,040$ 600$ 71.0SCL Gilroy Lions Creek Trail West Santa Teresa Blvd/Day Road 538$ 476$ 68.7ALA Hayward Tennyson Rd Ped/ Bike Bridge Project 1,164$ 931$ 68.0CCC Contra Costa County Public Works San Miguel Dr Complete Streets Improvements 1,570$ 1,160$ 68.0SCL Cupertino SR2S Creating Safer Schools, Streets, and Sidewalks for Students (CSSSS) 2,554$ 2,116$ 67.0ALA Alameda County Public Works Castro Valley High School SRTS 2,677$ 2,175$ 66.0MRN SMART SMART San Rafael McInnis to Smith Ranch 2,468$ 2,050$ 64.0CCC Lafayette Pleasant Hill Rd. Complete Street Project 3,967$ 3,480$ 64.0




Cost ($1,000s)

TotalFund

Request ($1,000s)

MTC Reg'l Score

CCC Contra Costa County Public Works Lone Tree Pt Bay Trail ‐ Hercules to Rodeo CCC 3,359$ 2,492$ 62.0CCC Walnut Creek Walnut Blvd Bike/Ped Improvements at Walnut Heights Elementary School 540$ 478$ 61.0SCL Gilroy Lions Creek Trail Kern to Day Road 1,500$ 1,327$ 61.0ALA Alameda County Public Works Heyer Ave School Corridor SRTS 1,990$ 290$ 57.3ALA East Bay Regional Parks District Doolittle Dr Bay Trail ‐ MLK, Jr Shoreline, Oak 7,950$ 4,000$ 54.3SM South San Francisco South San Francisco Bike Trail Safety and Connectivity Improvements 1,276$ 1,126$ 51.0ALA San Leandro Scramble Pedestrian Crosswalk at E 14th/San Joaquin Ave Intersection 419$ 369$ 49.0CCC Oakley Laurel Rd and Rose Ave Intersection and Gap Closure Improvements 1,272$ 952$ 44.0SM Belmont Ralston Ave Corridor Improvements Segments 3&4 8,337$ 5,280$ 35.061 Applications Received. Totals 275,573$ 166,372$


Date: February 24, 2016 W.I.: 1515 Referred by: PAC Revised: 05/25/16-ED 01/25/17-C

ABSTRACT

Resolution No. 4218, Revised

This resolution adopts the Active Transportation Program (ATP) Regional Program Cycle 3

Guidelines and Program of Projects for the San Francisco Bay Area, for submission to the

California Transportation Commission (CTC), consistent with the provisions of Senate Bill 99

and Assembly Bill 101.

This resolution includes the following attachments:

Attachment A – Guidelines: Policies, Procedures and Project Selection Criteria

Attachment B – Regional Active Transportation Program of Projects

This resolution was revised via Executive Director Authority on May 25, 2016 to update the

funding targets identified in Attachment A, Appendix A-2, to reflect the adopted 2017 Active

Transportation Program Fund Estimate adopted by the California Transportation Commission on

May 18, 2016.

This resolution was amended via Commission Action on January 25, 2017 to include Attachment

B, Regional Active Transportation Program of Projects, and to update various appendices in

Attachment A, Guidelines: Policies, Procedures, and Project Selection Criteria.

Further discussion of these actions is contained in the Summary Sheet to the MTC Programming

and Allocations Committee dated February 10, 2016 and January 11, 2017.

Date: February 24, 2016 W.I.: 1515 Referred by: PAC RE: Adoption of Regional Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Guidelines and Program of Projects

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

RESOLUTION NO. 4218

WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is the regional

transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay Area pursuant to Government Code

Section 66500 et seq.; and

WHEREAS, MTC has adopted and periodically revises, pursuant to Government Code

Sections 66508 and 65080, a Regional Transportation Plan (RTP); and

WHEREAS, MTC is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the

nine-county San Francisco Bay Area region and is required to prepare and endorse a

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) which includes federal funds; and

WHEREAS, MTC is the designated recipient for federal funding administered by the

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) assigned to the MPO/Regional Transportation

Planning Agency (RTPA) of the San Francisco Bay Area for the programming of projects

(regional federal funds); and

WHEREAS, the California State Legislature passed and the Governor signed into law

Senate Bill 99 (Chapter 359, Statutes 2013) and Assembly Bill 101 (Chapter 354, Statutes 2013),

establishing the Active Transportation Program (ATP); and

WHEREAS, MTC adopts, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2381(a)(1), an

Active Transportation Program of Projects using a competitive process consistent with

guidelines adopted by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) pursuant to Streets and

Highways Code Section 2382(a), that is submitted to the CTC and the California Department of

Transportation (Caltrans); and

WHEREAS, MTC has developed, in cooperation with CTC, Caltrans, operators of

publicly owned mass transportation services, congestion management agencies, countywide

MTC Resolution No. 4218Page 2

transportation planning agencies, and local governments, guidelines to be used in thedevelopment of the ATP; and

WHEREAS. a multi-disciplinary advisory group evaluates and recommends candidateATP projects for MTC inclusion in the Active Transportation Program of Projects; and

WHEREAS, the ATP is subject to public review and comment; now, therefore, be it

RESOLVED, that MTC approves the guidelines to be used in the evaluation of candidateprojects for inclusion in the ATP, as set forth in Attachment A of this resolution, and be it further

RESOLVED, that MTC approves the Active Transportation Program of Projects, as setforth in Attachment B of this resolution, and be it further

RESOLVED that the Executive Director or designee can make technical adjustments andother non-substantial revisions; and be it further

RESOLVED, that the Executive Director shall forward a copy of this resolution, andsuch other information as may be required to the CTC, Caltrans, and to such other agencies asmay be appropriate.

The above resolution was enteredinto by the Metropolitan TransportationCommission at a regular meeting ofthe Commission held in Oakland,California, on February 24, 2016.

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Dave Cortese,

MTC Resolution No. 4218 Attachment A, Appendix A-1 Adopted: 02/24/16-C 01/25/17-C

J:\PROJECT\Funding\T4‐MAP21\MAP21 ‐ TAP and ATP\ATP\Regional ATP\2017 rATP (Cycle 3)\Staff Recs\tmp‐4218_Attachment‐A_Appendix_A‐1.docx

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (MTC)

2017 Regional Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Appendix A‐1: ATP Development Schedule (Subject to Change)

January 25, 2017

January 2016 CTC releases draft ATP Guidelines

January‐February 2016 Draft Regional ATP Guidelines presented to Working Groups

February 10, 2016 MTC Programming and Allocations Committee (PAC) scheduled review and recommendation of final proposed Regional ATP Guidelines

February 24, 2016 MTC Commission scheduled adoption of Regional ATP Guidelines MTC submits adopted Regional ATP Guidelines to CTC for consideration

March 17, 2016 CTC scheduled adoption of State ATP Guidelines CTC scheduled approval of MTC’s Regional ATP Guidelines

March 30, 2016 CTC scheduled release of ATP Call for Projects for Statewide Competitive Program MTC scheduled release of ATP Call for Projects for Regional Program

June 15, 2016 State ATP Applications Due to CTC (Statewide Program) Regional ATP Applications Due to MTC (Regional Program)

October 28, 2016 CTC releases staff recommendation for ATP Statewide Competitive Program

December 7, 2016 ATP Statewide Program Adoption: CTC scheduled to adopt statewide program and transmit unsuccessful projects to the Regions for consideration

December 21, 2016 MTC releases staff recommendation for ATP Regional Program

January 2017 Working Group discussions of staff recommendations

January 11, 2017 MTC Programming and Allocation Committee (PAC) scheduled review and recommendation of final ATP Regional Program

January 25, 2017 ATP Regional Program Adoption: MTC Commission scheduled approval of ATP regional program and transmittal to CTC for consideration

March 15‐16, 2017 CTC Approval of ATP Regional Program: CTC scheduled to approve Regional Program

April 1, 2017 TIP Amendment Deadline: Successful ATP project sponsors to submit 2017 TIP Amendment, including Resolution of Local Support

May 24, 2017 MTC Commission scheduled to approve TIP Amendment to add ATP projects into federal TIP

June 30, 2017 TIP Approval: FHWA/FTA anticipated approval of ATP projects in federal TIP

November 1, 2019 Allocation/Obligation Submittal Deadline for Regional ATP projects programmed in FY 2019‐20

January 31, 2020 Allocation/Obligation Deadline for Regional ATP projects programmed in FY 2019‐20

November 1, 2020 Allocation/Obligation Submittal Deadline for Regional ATP projects programmed in FY 2020‐21

January 31, 2021 Allocation/Obligation Deadline for Regional ATP projects programmed in FY 2020‐21

Shaded Area – Actions by State, CTC or Caltrans

2017 Regional Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3

Appendix A‐2: MTC ATP Regional Share Targets

FY 2019‐20 and FY 2020‐21

January 2017

ATP Regional Share All numbers in thousands

Fund Source FY 2019‐20 FY 2020‐21 Total

$5,506 $5,506 $11,012

$6,174 $5,506 $11,680

Federal Other $1,915 $1,915 $3,830

$2,908 $2,908 $5,816

$3,753 $2,908 $6,661

Total ATP Regional Share $11,842 $10,329 $22,171

State's 25% Disadvantaged Communities Minimum Requirement

Classification FY 2019‐20 FY 2020‐21 Total

$2,582 $2,582 $5,164

$2,767 $2,582 $5,349

$7,747 $7,747 $15,494

$9,075 $7,747 $16,822

Total ATP Regional Share $11,842 $10,329 $22,171

MTC Resolution No. 4218Attachment A, Appendix A-2

Adopted: 02/24/16-CRevised: 05/25/16-ED

Revised: 01/25/17-C

J:\PROJECT\Funding\T4‐MAP21\MAP21 ‐ TAP and ATP\ATP\Regional ATP\2017 rATP (Cycle 3)\Staff Recs\[tmp‐4218_Attachment‐A_Appendix_A‐2.xlsx]Appendix A‐2

Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)

Federal STBG (TAP)

75% ‐ Anywhere in the Region

25% ‐ Benefiting Disadvantaged Communities

State

Attachment BMetropolitan Transportation Commission2017 Active Transportation Program (ATP)Cycle 3FY 2019‐20 through FY 2020‐21Regional ATP Cycle 3 List of ProjectsJanuary 2017

Regional ATP Cycle 3 Projects (in county order)County Implementing Agency Project Regional ATPAlameda Alameda County PWA Active Oakland Comprehensive SRTS Program 977,000$ Alameda Alameda County PWA Fairview Elementary School SRTS 542,000$ Alameda Alameda County PWA Somerset Ave School Corridor SRTS 330,000$ Alameda Alameda County PWA Lewelling Blvd SRTS 400,000$ Alameda Berkeley SRTS Improvements ‐ John Muir Elementary 270,000$ Alameda Emeryville Bike/Ped Greenway Safety & Connectivity Imp. Project 265,000$ Contra Costa Contra Costa County PW Fred Jackson Way First Mile/ Last Mile Connection 3,298,000$ Contra Costa Contra Costa County PW Pacheco Blvd Sidewalk Gap Closure Phase 3 619,000$ Marin San Rafael Francisco Blvd East Ave Bridge Bike Ped Connectivity 4,025,000$ Napa City of Napa SR 29 Bike/Ped Undercrossing 531,000$ San Francisco SFMTA Powell Street Safety Project 4,400,000$ San Mateo Woodside Woodside ES Student Pathway Ph. 3 528,000$ Solano Suisun City McCoy Creek Trail 1,770,000$ Solano Vallejo Bay Trail/Vine Trail Gap Closure 4,216,000$

TOTAL: $22,171,000

Regional ATP Cycle 3 Contingency List (in descending score order)County Implementing Agency Project Regional ATPSolano Suisun City McCoy Creek Trail *Remaining Amount* $2,367,000San Francisco SFMTA Vision Zero SF Safer Intersections $2,002,000Contra Costa Concord Downtown Corridors Bike/Ped Improvement $3,718,000San Mateo San Carlos Route 101 Holly Street Bike Ped Overcrossing $4,200,000Alameda Oakland Oakland SRTS: Crossing to Safety $3,714,000Napa Napa Co. Office of Education Napa County SRTS $437,000Alameda Alameda County PWA Royal Ave SRTS $456,000Alameda Berkeley SRTS Improvements for Oxford & Jefferson ES $267,000Contra Costa Pittsburg Active Trans. & Safe Routes Plan (WalkBikePittsburg2035) $312,000Alameda Alameda County PWA Proctor Elementary School SRTS $600,000

TOTAL: $18,073,000

J:\PROJECT\Funding\T4‐MAP21\MAP21 ‐ TAP and ATP\ATP\Regional ATP\2017 rATP (Cycle 3)\Staff Recs\[tmp‐4218_Attachment‐B.xlsx]rATP3‐ 2017‐01‐25

J:\PROJECT\Funding\T4‐MAP21\MAP21 ‐ TAP and ATP\ATP\Regional ATP\2017 rATP (Cycle 3)\Staff Recs\[tmp‐4218_Attachment‐B.xlsx]rATP3‐ 2017‐01‐25

MTC Resolution No. 4218Attachment B

Adopted: 02/24/16‐CRevised: 05/25/16‐ED

01/25/17‐C

Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee MEETING ... · 1/24/2017 · Caltrans District...

Documents

Transcript of Countywide Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee MEETING ... · 1/24/2017 · Caltrans District...