COUNTRY BULGARIA PROFILE€¦ · BULGARIA VERALL ERFORMANCE 63 ountries Rank Sofia ... Future...
Transcript of COUNTRY BULGARIA PROFILE€¦ · BULGARIA VERALL ERFORMANCE 63 ountries Rank Sofia ... Future...
COUNTRYPROFILE BULGARIA
1
WORLD COMPETITIVENESSRANKING 2019
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
Statistical tables
Factor I: Economic Performance
2
1
BASIC FACTS
Capital
Land area (square km '000) 1112018
Exchange Rate (per $) 1.6572018
Population - market size (millions) 7.052018
46
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (US$ billions) 65.12018
54
GDP (PPP) per capita (US$) 23,0242018
48
Real GDP growth (%) 3.12018
25
Consumer price inflation (%) 2.632018
42
Unemployment rate (%) 5.202018
31
Labor force (millions) 3.362017
46
Current account balance (% of GDP) 2.382018
25
Direct investment stocks inward ($bn) 47.82017
52
Direct investment flows inward (% of GDP) 3.962018
13
PEER GROUPS RANKINGSEUROPE - MIDDLE EAST - AFRICA (40 countries) POPULATIONS < 20 MILLION (34 countries)
COMPETITIVENESS TRENDS - OVERALL
BULGARIAOVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries) Rank
Sofia
CHALLENGES IN 2019Economic institutions lack a strong judicial system and control of
corruption.
Centre for the Study of Democracy, Sofia
COMPETITIVENESS LANDSCAPE
5550 49 48 48
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
56
36
5046
5
2025
49 49 4751
5653 55
4650
47 49 4946
Dom
estic
Eco
nom
y
Inte
rnat
iona
l Tra
de
Inte
rnat
iona
l Inv
estm
ent
Empl
oym
ent
Pric
es
Publ
ic F
inan
ce
Tax
Pol
icy
Inst
itutio
nal F
ram
ewor
k
Busi
ness
Leg
isla
tion
Soci
etal
Fra
mew
ork
Prod
uctiv
ity &
Effi
cien
cy
Labo
r M
arke
t
Fina
nce
Man
agem
ent
Prac
tices
Att
itude
s an
d V
alue
s
Basi
c In
fras
truc
ture
Tec
hnol
ogic
al In
fras
truc
ture
Scie
ntifi
c In
fras
truc
ture
Hea
lth a
nd E
nvir
onm
ent
Educ
atio
n
Economic Performance Government Efficiency Business Efficiency Infrastructure
3633 32 33 32
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
3129
27 28 28
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
• Economic institutions lack a strong judicial system and control of corruption.
• Further efforts should be made to curb the informal economy.• Structural reforms to join ERM II and the Banking Union are
slow.• Insufficient action in reforming the energy sector.• Access to skilled labour is a growing challenge.
Provided by:Centre for the Study of Democracy, Sofia
3
2
IMPROVEMENTSWCY 2018
WCY 2019 DECLINES
WCY 2018
2.1.02 Government budget surplus/deficit (%) 0.93 1.99 1.5.01 Consumer price inflation 1.19
1.1.18 Gross fixed capital formation - real growth 3.80 6.53 2.3.08 Exchange rate stability 0.025
4.3.20 Scientific research legislation 3.07 4.70 2.1.10 Tax evasion 4.40
4.3.10 Researchers in R&D per capita 2.0 3.0 2.4.02 Protectionism 6.07
2.5.01 Justice 1.87 2.77 1.2.02 Current account balance 3.94
2.3.09 Legal and regulatory framework 3.10 4.53 2.3.12 Bureaucracy 2.07
4.5.15 University education 2.53 3.65 2.2.12 Real personal taxes 8.13
3.1.07 Workforce productivity 3.67 5.16 2.4.07 Government subsidies 1.10
4.2.12 Public-private partnerships 3.87 5.40 3.2.03 Remuneration in services professions 7,891
2.5.02 Homicide 1.8 1.1 4.5.01 Total public expenditure on education 4.2
3.3.08 Stock markets 3.33 4.56 3.2.01 Compensation levels 3.00
2.5.05 Social cohesion 2.80 3.79 1.5.02 Cost-of-living index 54.90
3.3.17 Venture capital 3.93 5.32 1.1.14 Real GDP growth 3.6
2.1.11 Pension funding 2.00 2.70 3.5.06 Digital transformation in companies 5.73
4.5.16 Management education 2.87 3.86 3.2.20 Attracting and retaining talents 6.00
COMPETITIVENESS EVOLUTION & ATTRACTIVENESS INDICATORS
BULGARIACOMPETITIVENESS EVOLUTION
2.63
2.38
1.51
5.96
1.38
9,351
3.6
5.02
The criteria below highlight the 15 biggest Improvements and the 15 biggest Declines in the overall performance of the economy. They are
determined by the largest percentage changes in the value of each criterion from one yearbook to the next.
WCY 2019
5.26
KEY ATTRACTIVENESS INDICATORS
From a list of 15 indicators, respondents of the Executive Opinion Survey were asked to select 5 that they perceived as the key
attractiveness factors of their economy. The chart shows the percentage of responses per indicator from the highest number of responses
to the lowest.
0.045
2.60
3.61
3.44
62.10
3.1
7.0%8.8%12.3%17.5%19.3%22.8%22.8%28.1%28.1%29.8%38.6%40.4%49.1%56.1%57.9%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Competency of governmentStrong R&D culture
Effective legal environmentEffective labor relations
Quality of corporate governanceBusiness-friendly environment
Reliable infrastructurePolicy stability & predictability
Open and positive attitudesAccess to financing
High educational levelDynamism of the economy
Competitive tax regimeSkilled workforce
Cost competitiveness
4
WORLD COMPETITIVENESSDIGITAL RANKING 2019
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
5
Alpha AlphaLabelBeta BetaLabel Gamma GammaLabel1 2 2 2 2 2 24 4 4 2 2
6.5 4 4 2 28.5 4 4 2 2
10.5 4 4 2 2
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
54 47 45 43 45
45 38 41 41 46
42 38 42 42 42
59 58 57 55 48
COMPETITIVENESS & DIGITAL RANKINGS
PEER GROUPS RANKINGS
EUROPE - MIDDLE EAST - AFRICA (40 countries) POPULATIONS < 20 MILLION (34 countries)
Knowledge
Technology
Future readiness
OVERALL
DIGITAL TRENDS - OVERALL
BULGARIA
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries)
OVERALL & FACTORS - 5 years
5447 45 43 45
55 50 49 48 48
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Digital
Competitiveness
37 33 32 30 31
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
32 30 28 26 27
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
46 50 46 37
42 46 42 4445
48 43 56 47
Knowledge Talent Training & education Scientific concentration
Technology Regulatory framework Capital Technological framework
Future readiness Adaptive attitudes Business agility IT integrationThe direction of the triangle indicates the performance change from the last year: improved or stabledeclined
Overall Factors Sub-Factors
N.B. This graph provides only a comparison of the country’s performance in the two rankings.
6
u Overall top strengths
w Overall top weaknesses
Subfactors 2015 2016 2017 2018 201954 52 51 53 50
47 40 39 42 46
32 31 30 33 37
Talent Rank Rank Rank
Educational assessment PISA - Math 43 w 55 46w International experience 55 47 29 Foreign highly-skilled personnel 50 42 u 8 Management of cities 39 u 16 52 Digital/Technological skills 32 47 39 Net flow of international students 52 u 25 u 15 49
Subfactors 2015 2016 2017 2018 201951 48 50 52 46
43 36 46 50 42
35 34 34 36 44
Regulatory framework Rank Rank Rank
Starting a business 44 36 37 Enforcing contracts 32 43 42 Immigration laws 44 41 24 Development and application of technology52 45 44 Scientific research legislation 50 32 45 Intellectual property rights 49 u 24 47
Subfactors 2015 2016 2017 2018 201959 58 47 48 43
60 60 61 59 56
52 53 55 54 47
Adaptive attitudes Rank Rank Rank
E-Participation 33 w 55 39 Internet retailing 50 45 44 Tablet possession 45 w 56 46 Smartphone possession 38 38 50 Attitudes toward globalization 55 w 55
Talent
Robots in Education and R&D
Training & education Scientific concentration
TECHNOLOGY
Scientific concentration
Capital Technological framework
FUTURE READINESS
IT integration
Business agility IT integration
FACTORS BREAKDOWN - STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
BULGARIA
Technological framework
Opportunities and threats E-GovernmentWorld robots distribution Public-private partnerships
Total expenditure on R&D (%)Total public expenditure on education Total R&D personnel per capita
Training & education
Adaptive attitudes
Business agility
Venture capital Internet bandwidth speedInvestment in Telecommunications High-tech exports (%)
Regulatory framework
Capital
IT & media stock market capitalization Communications technologyFunding for technological development Mobile Broadband subscribersBanking and financial services Wireless broadbandCountry credit rating Internet users
Higher education achievement Female researchersPupil-teacher ratio (tertiary education) R&D productivity by publicationGraduates in Sciences Scientific and technical employmentWomen with degrees High-tech patent grants
Employee training
KNOWLEDGE
Agility of companies Cyber securityUse of big data and analytics Sofware piracyKnowledge transfer
7
WORLD TALENTRANKING 2019
All data are available from theWorld Competitiveness Online.
Visit our eShop
8
Alpha AlphaLabel Beta BetaLabel Gamma GammaLabel1 2 2 2 2 2 24 4 4 2 2
Value
3.6 % 48u 21.7 % 27 1,464 US$ 50 17.61 ratio 46u 12.64 ratio 36 4.00 Survey [0..10] 53 4.84 Survey [0..10] 55u 46.48 % 25 2.84 Survey [0..10] 58
Value
u 62.10 index 4w 5.26 Survey [0..10] 60 4.32 Survey [0..10] 57 2.67 Survey [0..10] 56w 3.96 Survey [0..10] 59 3.89 Survey [0..10] 50 9,351 US$ 52w 49,907 US$ 58 19.89 % 36 2.77 Survey [0..10] 53 20.18 micrograms 45
Value
u 2.86 % 3 4.35 Survey [0..10] 51 4.60 Survey [0..10] 57 4.60 Survey [0..10] 55 4.60 Survey [0..10] 51 4.04 Survey [0..10] 51 19.66 % 47w 3.65 Survey [0..10] 59w 3.86 Survey [0..10] 63 5.82 Survey [0..10] 39 1.71 number 37 443 Average 42
Investment & Development 2019 Rank
Health infrastructure meets the needs of society
2019 Rank
Total public expenditure on education Percentage of GDP
Pupil-teacher ratio (secondary education)Apprenticeships are sufficiently implemented
Readiness 2019 Rank
Educational assessment - PISA PISA survey of 15-year olds
Appeal
Exposure to particle pollution Mean population exposure to PM2.5, Micrograms per cubic metre
is readily available
Labor force growth Percentage change
Skilled labor
Management education meets the needs of the business community
Language skills are meeting the needs of enterprises
Student mobility inbound Foreign tertiary-level students per 1000 inhabitants
Primary and secondary education meets the needs of a competitive economy
Graduates in Sciences % of graduates in ICT, Engineering, Math & Natural Sciences
University education meets the needs of a competitive economy
Finance skills are readily available
International experience of senior managers is generally significant
Competent senior managers are readily available
Justice is fairly administered
Remuneration in services professions Gross annual income including supplements such as bonuses, US$
Remuneration of management Total base salary plus bonuses and long-term incentives, US$
Effective personal income tax rate Percentage of an income equal to GDP per capita
Brain drain (well-educated and skilled people) does not hinder competitiveness in your economy
Quality of life is high
Foreign highly-skilled personnel are attracted to your country's business environment
Cost-of-living index Index of a basket of goods & services in the main city, including housing (New York City = 100)
Attracting and retaining talents is a priority in companies
Worker motivation in companies is high
Gov. expenditure on education per student Percentage of GDP per capita (secondary education)
Total public exp. on education per student
BULGARIA
Spending per enrolled pupil/student, all levels
Pupil-teacher ratio (primary education) Ratio of students to teaching staff
Ratio of students to teaching staff
Employee training is a high priority in companies
Female labor force Percentage of total labor force
IMD World Talent Ranking 2019
OVERALL PERFORMANCE (63 countries)
61
58 5857
52
47
44 4445
46
60
57 5758 58
59
57
5958
55
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Overall
Investment &Development
Appeal
Readiness
46
5852
55
Investment & Development
Appeal
Readiness
The direction of the triangle indicates the performance change from the last year: improved or stabledeclined
IMD
, IMD
INTE
RNAT
ION
AL R
EAL
WOR
LD. R
EAL
LEAR
NIN
G, IM
D B
USI
NES
S SC
HOO
L an
d IM
D W
ORLD
COM
PETI
TIVE
NES
S YE
ARB
OOK
are
trade
mar
ks o
f IM
D –
Inte
rnat
iona
l Ins
titut
e fo
r Man
agem
ent D
evel
opm
ent.
©IM
D 2
017
IMD SwitzerlandChemin de Bellerive 23 P.O. Box 915CH-1001 Lausanne SwitzerlandCentral tel: +41 21 618 01 11
IMD SingaporeIMD SE Asia Pte. LtdSouth Beach Tower38 Beach Road #17-11Singapore 189767Central tel: +65 6715 9988
Connect with us
Developing leaders Transforming organizations Impacting your future
IMD is ranked in open programs worldwide – 7 years in a row.Financial Times 2012 – 2018
Talk with us+41 21 618 07 00 [email protected]