COUNCIL MINUTES Monday 20 February 2017 - bodc.tas.gov.au · Planning Coordinator, Paula...

COUNCIL MINUTES Monday 20 February 2017

Council Chambers

John Brown

General Manager

Break O’Day Council

20 February 2017

| CONTENTS 2

| CONTENTS 3

CONTENTS CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... 3

02/17.1.0 ATTENDANCE .................................................................................................................. 5

02/17.1.1 Present ......................................................................................................................... 5

02/17.1.2 Apologies ...................................................................................................................... 5

02/17.1.3 Leave of Absence ......................................................................................................... 5

02/17.1.4 Staff in Attendance ...................................................................................................... 5

02/17.2.0 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME .................................................................................................. 6

02/17.3.0 DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST OF A COUNCILLOR OR CLOSE ASSOCIATE ...... 6

02/17.4.0 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES ......................................................................................... 6

02/17.4.1 Confirmation of Minutes – Council Meeting 16 January 2017 .................................... 6

02/17.5.0 COUNCIL WORKSHOPS HELD SINCE 16 JANUARY 2017 COUNCIL MEETING .................. 7

02/17.6.0 PLANNING AUTHORITY ................................................................................................... 8

02/17.6.1 DA266-2016 – Demolition of Wooden Bridge and Construction of New Concrete Bridge ........................................................................................................................... 8

02/17.6.2 DA232-2016 – New Shed and Amenities – 107 Tasman Highway, Beaumaris .......... 12

02/17.7.0 PETITIONS ...................................................................................................................... 19

02/17.8.0 NOTICES OF MOTION .................................................................................................... 19

02/17.8.1 Notice of Motion – Nespresso Recycling Facility – Clr J Drummond ......................... 19

02/17.8.2 Notice of Motion – Request to Take Over Lease on Jetty – Clr M Tucker ................. 20

02/17.9.0 COUNCILLOR’S QUESTIONS ON NOTICE ....................................................................... 23

02/17.10.0 COUNCILLOR’S QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE ............................................................ 23

02/17.12.0 MAYOR’S & COUNCILLOR’S COMMUNICATIONS.......................................................... 23

02/17.11.1 Mayor’s Communications for Period Ending 16 January 2017 .................................. 23

02/17.11.2 Councillor’s Reports for Period Ending 20 February 2017 ......................................... 24

02/17.12.0 BUSINESS AND CORPORATE SERVICES .......................................................................... 25

02/17.12.1 Corporate Services Department Report .................................................................... 25

02/17.12.2 Monthly Financial Report ........................................................................................... 26

02/17.12.3 Visitor Information Centre Report ............................................................................. 27

02/17.12.4 Review of LG11 – Rating Exemptions and Remissions Policy .................................... 28

02/17.12.5 Review of LG18 – Debt Collection Policy ................................................................... 28

02/17.12.6 Review of LG20 – Distribution of Unclaimed Funds Policy ........................................ 29

02/17.12.7 Review of LG27 – Information Management Policy .................................................. 30

02/17.12.8 Review of LG29 – Privacy Policy ................................................................................. 30

02/17.12.9 Review of LG37 – Telephone Answering Procedure Policy ....................................... 31

02/17.12.10 Review of LG41 – Customer Service Charter ............................................................. 31

02/17.12.11 Budget Review as 31 December 2016 ....................................................................... 32

| CONTENTS 4

02/17.13.0 WORKS AND INFRASTRUCTURE .................................................................................... 34

02/17.13.1 Works and Infrastructure Report ............................................................................... 34

02/17.13.2 Animal Control Report ............................................................................................... 35

02/17.14.0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ....................................................................................... 36

02/17.14.1 Community Services Report ....................................................................................... 36

02/17.14.2 Binalong Bay Foreshore Master Plan – Foreshore Pedestrian Link ........................... 37

02/17.14.3 Break O’Day Bike Project ........................................................................................... 38

02/17.14.4 Catering Fit-Out of Bendigo Bank Community Stadium (Bendigo BOCS) .................. 39

02/17.15.0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES .............................................................................................. 39

02/17.15.1 Development Services Report.................................................................................... 39

02/17.15.2 Planning Approvals Issued ......................................................................................... 40

02/17.15.3 Building Services Approvals ....................................................................................... 40

02/17.16.0 GOVERNANCE................................................................................................................ 40

02/17.16.1 General Manager’s Report ......................................................................................... 40

02/17.16.2 Gaming Control Act Community Interest Test – Discussion Paper ........................... 42

02/17.16.3 TasWater – Consultation Issues Paper – Price and Service Plan 3 (December 2016)43

02/17.16.4 Redistribution of Legislative Council Electoral Boundaries ....................................... 45

02/17.16.5 Review as at 31 December 2016 – Break O’Day Council Annual Plan 2016/2017 .... 46

02/17.17.0 CLOSED COUNCIL .......................................................................................................... 48

02/17.17.1 Outstanding Actions List for Closed Council .............................................................. 48

02/17.17.2 Contract 030\001\097\ - 2016/2017 Bridge Replacement Package2016 - Closed Council Item Pursuant To Section 15(2)D Of The Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 ................................................................................... 48

02/17.17.3 Contract 030\001\098\ - Design & Construction of Bridge 1128, Ryans Road Bridge, Scamander River - Closed Council Item Pursuant To Section 15(2)D Of The Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 .............................................. 48

| 02/17.1.1 Present 5

02/17.1.0 ATTENDANCE

02/17.1.1 Present Mayor Mick Tucker Deputy Mayor John McGiveron Councillor John Tucker Councillor Janet Drummond Councillor Hannah Rubenach-Quinn Councillor Kylie Wright Councillor Barry LeFevre Councillor Glenn McGuinness Councillor Margaret Osborne OAM

02/17.1.2 Apologies Nil

02/17.1.3 Leave of Absence Nil

02/17.1.4 Staff in Attendance General Manager, John Brown Manager Community Services, Chris Hughes (Item 1.0 – 17.3) Creditors/Debtors Officer, Rachel Lewis (Item 1.0 – 17.3) Works Supervisor, Wayne Polden (Item 1.0 – 14.0) Building Services Coordinator, Jake Ihnen (Item 6.0 – 11.2 / 13.2 – 15.2) Planning Coordinator, Paula Kloosterman (Item 6.0 – 6.2) Planning Officer, Chris Triebe (Item 6.0 – 6.2) Planning Consultant, Rebecca Green (Item 6.0 – 6.2) Manager Corporate Services, Bob Hoogland (Item 6.1 – 13.0) Works Project Officer, David Jolly (Item 16.5 – 17.3) Project Officer, Stuart Barwick (Item 16.5 – 17.3) Community Services Project Officer, Erica Lowry (Item 14.2 – 15.0)

| 02/17.4.1 Confirmation of Minutes – Council Meeting 16 January 2017 6

02/17.2.0 PUBLIC QUESTION TIME Two (2) people in the gallery.

In accordance with Section 31(1) of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2005 the following

questions were submitted in writing prior to the Council Meeting.

Nil.

02/17.3.0 DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST OF A COUNCILLOR OR CLOSE ASSOCIATE

Section 48 or 55 of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that a Councillor or Officer who has an interest in any matter to be discussed at a Council

Meeting that will be attended by the Councillor or Officer must disclose the nature of the interest in a written notice given to the General Manager before the meeting; or at the meeting before the matter is discussed.

A Councillor or Officer who makes a disclosure under Section 48 or 55 must not preside at the part of the meeting relating to the matter; or

participate in; or be present during any discussion or decision making procedure relating to the matter, unless allowed by the Council.

Nil.

02/17.4.0 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

02/17.4.1 Confirmation of Minutes – Council Meeting 16 January 2017 OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the minutes of the Council Meeting held on the 16 January 2017 be confirmed. DISCUSSION: No discussion of significance took place on this item. COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.4.1.19 Moved: Clr G McGuinness / Seconded: Clr J Tucker That the minutes of the Council Meeting held on the 16 January 2017 be confirmed with an amendment to include within the discussion on item 01/17.14.4 regarding the triathlon thatClr Rubenach-Quinn felt that adequate information had not been provided to enable her to make an informed decision”. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

| 02/17.4.1 Confirmation of Minutes – Council Meeting 16 January 2017 7

02/17.5.0 COUNCIL WORKSHOPS HELD SINCE 16 JANUARY 2017 COUNCIL MEETING

There was a Workshop held on Monday 6 February – the following items were listed for discussion.

History Room – Updated Policy Documents

Review of LG18 – Debt Collection Policy

Review of LG20 – Distribution of Unclaimed Funds Policy

Review of LG27 – Information Management Policy

Review of LG29 – Privacy Policy

Review of LG37 – Telephone Answering Procedure Policy

Review of LG41 – Customer Service Charter

Restricting Locals Using Tourist Water Supply

Budget Review as 31 December 2016

Discussion Paper – Cost Benefit Analysis Halfway Hill Landfill Site

Stieglitz Street, Falmouth – Sealing Requests

Bike Proposal

Binalong Bay Foreshore Master Plan – Foreshore Pedestrian Link

Review of Policy AM13 – Memorial Gardens Policy

Review of Policy AM14 – Mowing Policy

TasWater – Consultation Issues paper – Price and Service Plan 3 (December 2016)

Gaming Control Act Community Interest Test – Discussion Paper

Discussion of a Permanent BBQ outside the Memorial Hall

Parking Signs in the Main Centres of Town

Nespresso Recycling Facility

Tree Harvesting Utilising Dakins Road, St Marys and the Junction onto Elephant Pas Road, St Marys

Northern Side of Main Street, St Marys – Business Request for Seating and Bins

Bridges – Replacing Bridges if only one Property access them

| 02/17.6.1DA266-2016 – Demolition of Wooden Bridge and Construction of New Concrete Bridge 8

02/17.6.0 PLANNING AUTHORITY Pursuant to Section 25 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 the Mayor informed the Council that it was now acting as a Planning Authority under the Land Use Planning and Approvals Act 1993.

02/17.6.1 DA266-2016 – Demolition of Wooden Bridge and Construction of New Concrete Bridge

FILE REFERENCE DA 218-2015

OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: After due consideration of the representation received and pursuant to Section 57 of the Land Use Planning & Approvals Act 1993 and the Break O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013 that the application for BRIDGE REPLACEMENT on land situated at BRIDGE ACROSS GOLDEN FLEECE RIVULET - ARGONAUGT ROAD ST HELENS described in Certificate of Title LAST RECORD, 1-999-99999 be APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. Development must accord with the Development Application DA 266-16 received by Council 23

December 2016, together with all submitted documentation received and forming part of the development application, except as varied by conditions on this Planning Permit.

2. No road construction works are to commence within any Council maintained road until a

permit to undertake works in the road reservation has been issued by Council’s Works Manager.

3. Use of the development must not create a nuisance as defined by the Environmental

Management and Pollution Control Act 1994. 4. Works on the site must not result in a concentration of water flowing onto other properties or

cause ponding or other stormwater nuisance. 5. Standard Phytophthora and frog chytrid pathogen hygiene measures must be implemented for

the construction and maintenance of works in accordance with and using the Weed and Disease Planning and Hygiene Guidelines - Preventing the spread of weeds and diseases in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2015, Eds. K. Stewart & M. Askey-Doran. DPIPWE, Hobart, Tas). A copy of the Weed and Disease Management Plan prepared from these Guidelines is to be provided to and approved by Council prior to works beginning, including commissioning of the work site.

6. All underground infrastructure including all forms of water, storm water, power, gas and telecommunication systems must be located prior to the commencement of any on-site excavation and / or construction works. Any works to be undertaken within 2 metres of any Council owned infrastructure must be done in consultation with Council’s Works Manager.

7. A management plan must be submitted to and approved by Council’s Planning Co-ordinator prior to the commencement of works, demonstrating how all proposed demolition and construction works will be undertaken in a manner that does not create environmental nuisances through noise, smoke, odour, dust or illumination.


8. No works are to commence on site until revegetation and weed management plans relevant to all works associated with the demolition of the existing bridge and construction of the proposed bridge, have been submitted to and approved by Council’s Planning Co-ordinator. The revegetation plan is to prevent future erosion through the use of seeds or rootstock derived from provenance taken within the boundaries of or vicinity of the site.

9. A soil and water management plan for the demolition of the existing bridge and construction

of the new bridge must be submitted to and approved by Council prior to any works commencing.

10. All building wastes are to be removed to the appropriate waste disposal facility to prevent an environmental nuisance being caused outside of the works site.

11. No on-site works are to occur until all necessary permits have been issued and copies provided to Council’s Planning Co-ordinator.

ADVICE

All works associated with the development should be conducted in accordance with Guidelines for Soil and Water Management, Hobart City Council, available on Council’s website (http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Guidelines_for_Soil_and_Water_Management.pdf). All worked areas not covered by structures must be promptly and progressively stabilised (eg revegetated) so that they will not erode and/or act as a source of sediment transfer.

Use or development which may impact on Aboriginal cultural heritage is subject to the Aboriginal Relics Act 1975. If Aboriginal relics are uncovered during works, all works are to immediately cease and an Aboriginal site survey is required to determine the level of impact and the appropriate mitigation procedures.

Prior to the commencement of any works within the development site, a copy of the Permit for the ‘Taking of Native Flora’ species as issued under the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 and issued by the Natural and Cultural Heritage Division of the Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment, is to be provided to Council’s Planning Co-ordinator. This Permit is for the disturbance of the Hierochloe rariflora that is listed as rare under the above Tasmanian Act.

Activities associated with construction works are not to be performed outside the permissible time frames listed:

o Mon-Friday 7 am to 6 pm o Saturday 9 am to 6 pm o Sunday and public holidays 10 am to 6 pm

INTRODUCTION: Application is made for the demolition of an existing wooden road bridge and the construction of a replacement concrete bridge over the Golden Fleece Rivulet on Argonaut Road. As the construction of the bridge requires the issuance of a Planning Permit, the demolition of the

http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Guidelines_for_Soil_and_Water_Management.pdf



existing bridge is not deemed to be exempt under General Exemption 5.9.1 of the Planning Scheme. The bridge provides the only all-weather vehicular access for residents to the local businesses on the eastern bank as well as access to properties west of St Helens and for emergency services to those on the western bank. The works will occur on a section of Argonaut Road, to the north-western outskirts of the St Helens township predominantly within the Environmental Management Zone; some road realignment works will be undertaken within the adjoining Rural Living and Environmental Living Zones. The Utilities Use is a qualified discretionary Use in these zones when not for minor utilities. Break O’Day Council applied for and received Federal funding for the replacement of the existing 43m long single lane wooden bridge with a 38.7m long, 2 lane concrete bridge that will use two 17m spans of prestressed girders with an in-situ topping slab. DISCUSSION:

- Clr McGiveron stated that he agreed that we need to do the work. - Clr Rubenach-Quinn sought clarity on a point of reference regarding if any representations

had been received and it was established that there had not been any representation made with respect to this development.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.6.1.20 Moved: Clr J McGiveron / Seconded: Clr B Le Fevre After due consideration of the representation received and pursuant to Section 57 of the Land Use Planning & Approvals Act 1993 and the Break O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013 that the application for BRIDGE REPLACEMENT on land situated at BRIDGE ACROSS GOLDEN FLEECE RIVULET - ARGONAUGT ROAD ST HELENS described in Certificate of Title LAST RECORD, 1-999-99999 be APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. Development must accord with the Development Application DA 266-16 received by Council

23 December 2016, together with all submitted documentation received and forming part of the development application, except as varied by conditions on this Planning Permit.

2. No road construction works are to commence within any Council maintained road until a

permit to undertake works in the road reservation has been issued by Council’s Works Manager.

3. Use of the development must not create a nuisance as defined by the Environmental

Management and Pollution Control Act 1994. 4. Works on the site must not result in a concentration of water flowing onto other properties or

cause ponding or other stormwater nuisance. 5. Standard Phytophthora and frog chytrid pathogen hygiene measures must be implemented

for the construction and maintenance of works in accordance with and using the Weed and Disease Planning and Hygiene Guidelines - Preventing the spread of weeds and diseases in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2015, Eds. K. Stewart & M. Askey-Doran. DPIPWE, Hobart, Tas). A copy of


the Weed and Disease Management Plan prepared from these Guidelines is to be provided to and approved by Council prior to works beginning, including commissioning of the work site.

6. All underground infrastructure including all forms of water, storm water, power, gas and telecommunication systems must be located prior to the commencement of any on-site excavation and / or construction works. Any works to be undertaken within 2 metres of any Council owned infrastructure must be done in consultation with Council’s Works Manager.

7. A management plan must be submitted to and approved by Council’s Planning Co-ordinator prior to the commencement of works, demonstrating how all proposed demolition and construction works will be undertaken in a manner that does not create environmental nuisances through noise, smoke, odour, dust or illumination.

8. No works are to commence on site until revegetation and weed management plans relevant to all works associated with the demolition of the existing bridge and construction of the proposed bridge, have been submitted to and approved by Council’s Planning Co-ordinator. The revegetation plan is to prevent future erosion through the use of seeds or rootstock derived from provenance taken within the boundaries of or vicinity of the site.

9. A soil and water management plan for the demolition of the existing bridge and construction

of the new bridge must be submitted to and approved by Council prior to any works commencing.


11. No on-site works are to occur until all necessary permits have been issued and copies provided to Council’s Planning Co-ordinator.

ADVICE

All works associated with the development should be conducted in accordance with Guidelines for Soil and Water Management, Hobart City Council, available on Council’s website (http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au/webdata/resources/files/Guidelines_for_Soil_and_Water_Management.pdf). All worked areas not covered by structures must be promptly and progressively stabilised (eg revegetated) so that they will not erode and/or act as a source of sediment transfer.

Use or development which may impact on Aboriginal cultural heritage is subject to the Aboriginal Relics Act 1975. If Aboriginal relics are uncovered during works, all works are to immediately cease and an Aboriginal site survey is required to determine the level of impact and the appropriate mitigation procedures.

Prior to the commencement of any works within the development site, a copy of the Permit for the ‘Taking of Native Flora’ species as issued under the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 and issued by the Natural and Cultural Heritage Division of the Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment, is to be provided to Council’s Planning Co-



| 02/17.6.2 DA232-2016 – New Shed and Amenities – 107 Tasman Highway, Beaumaris 12

ordinator. This Permit is for the disturbance of the Hierochloe rariflora that is listed as rare under the above Tasmanian Act.

Activities associated with construction works are not to be performed outside the permissible time frames listed: o Mon-Friday 7 am to 6 pm o Saturday 9 am to 6 pm o Sunday and public holidays 10 am to 6 pm

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.6.2 DA232-2016 – New Shed and Amenities – 107 Tasman Highway, Beaumaris

FILE REFERENCE DA 232-2016

OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: After due consideration of the representation received pursuant to Section 57 of the Land Use Planning & Approvals Act 1993 and the Break O’Day Council Interim Planning Scheme 2013 that the application for Shed with amenities on land situated at 107 Tasman Highway, Beaumaris described in Certificate of Title CT 138498/1 be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

1. Development must accord with the Development Application DA 232-2016 received by Council 27 October 2016, together with all submitted documentation received and forming part of the development application, except as varied by conditions of this Planning Permit.

2. The shed is approved for non-habitable residential use only and may not be changed without written consent from Council.

3. All stormwater runoff from the proposed shed must be detained by on-site water storage systems and overflow disposed of by means to roadside drain and disposed of by means that will not result in soil erosion or other stormwater nuisance in accordance with Part 14.4.1 A9 of the Break O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013.

4. A Soil and Water Management Plan must be submitted to Council for approval prior to a Building Permit being issued, prepared in accordance with Guidelines for Soil and Water Management, published by Hobart City Council and available on Council’s website (http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au/webdata /resources/files/Guidelines_for_Soil_and_Water_Management.pdf). All works associated with the development must be conducted in accordance with the approved Soil and Water Management Plan. All worked areas not covered by structures must be promptly and progressively stabilised (eg revegetated) so that they will not erode and/or act as a source of sediment transfer.

http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au/webdata%20/resources/files/Guidelines_for_Soil_and_Water_Management.pdf



5. Reflective materials must not be used as visible external elements in the building and the colours of external surfaces must be the same shades and tones of the surrounding landscape and vegetation elements in accordance with Part 14.4.1 A7 of the Break O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013.

6. Effluent disposal is subject to a technical assessment and issue of a Plumbing Permit by Council’s Plumbing Permit Authority.

7. The vehicle crossover from the carriageway to the property boundary must be constructed in accordance with the vehicular crossing requirements of the Department of State Growth, Tasmania, and must be financed by the applicant.

8. No works are to commence on the crossover until an Access Works Permit has been issued by the Department of State Growth, Tasmania, for the crossover construction (details can be found at http://www.transport.tas.gov.au/roads/permits/road-access).

9. The driveway must be constructed in a manner that ensures sediment is neither tracked nor eroded across the property boundary.

10. The areas shown to be set aside for vehicle access and car parking must be: a. Completed before the use of the development commences; b. Designed and laid out in accordance with the provisions of Table E6.0 of the Break

O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013; c. Provided with space for access, turning and manoeuvring of vehicles on-site to

enable them to enter and leave the site in a forward direction; d. Surfaced with a pervious dust free surface and drained in a manner that will not

cause stormwater nuisance.


12. All conditions of this permit must be completed to the satisfaction of the responsible authority, prior to the completion of the shed on the subject site.

ADVICE

All underground infrastructure including all forms of water, storm water, power, gas and telecommunication systems must be located prior to the commencement of any on-site excavation and/or construction works. Any works to be undertaken within two (2) metres of any Council owned infrastructure must be done in consultation with Council’s Manager Works and Infrastructure.

Activities associated with construction works are not to be performed outside the permissible time frame listed:

o Monday-Friday 7am to 6pm

o Saturday 9am to 6pm

o Sunday and public holidays 10am to 6pm

http://www.transport.tas.gov.au/roads/permits/road-access


INTRODUCTION: Application is made for the use and development of a steel kit shed with amenities at 107 Tasman Highway, Beaumaris. Residential use in the Environmental Living Zone is a permitted use, under Table 14.2 of the Break O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013.

Gate to subject site

Subject site


Location of proposed access (looking south)

Tasman Highway (lookng north along frontage of subject site)

Subject site


Subject site

Subject site

Subject site


DISCUSSION:

- The Planning Consultant advised that Council is only dealing with representation two (2) and three (3) as representation one (1) has been withdrawn as a result of an email which had been received from the representor.

- Clr Wright stated that she was of the understanding that a representation had been put in about the creek bed being altered and during heavy rain, water flows along the original site of the creek and may cause flooding to neighbouring properties.

- The Planning Consultant advised that the shed is at the highest point and non-inhabitable. - Clr Wright asked whether there is something that can be done in regards to re-routing the

course of the creek. - The General Manager advised that this was done by previous owners, not sure how long

ago it was done. - Clr Rubenach-Quinn stated she was concerned about the removal of the covenant and

referred to a tribunal decision in August 2012 which ordered the Council to refuse the amendment.

- The Planning Consultant advised that the Resource Management Appeals predated this, it is a separate issue. The applicant originally sought a minor amendment on 13 November 2012.

- Clr Rubenach-Quinn stated that she is concerned that Councillors were not provided with all information to make a uniformed decision.

- Mayor Tucker stated that the Planning Consultant clarified the points, so Councillors now all have the information.

- Clr Drummond stated that she has the same concerns as Clr Rubenach-Quinn and would have liked this information prior to making a decision in relation to this issue and to be able to make an informed decision.

- Clr Wright questioned access from the Highway – other properties have petitioned for access from the highway and have been denied.

- Mayor Tucker advised that Council can only deal with the item in front of us. COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.6.2.21 Moved: Clr G McGuinness / Seconded: Clr B Le Fevre After due consideration of the representation received pursuant to Section 57 of the Land Use Planning & Approvals Act 1993 and the Break O’Day Council Interim Planning Scheme 2013 that the application for Shed with amenities on land situated at 107 Tasman Highway, Beaumaris described in Certificate of Title CT 138498/1 be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:

1. Development must accord with the Development Application DA 232-2016 received by Council 27 October 2016, together with all submitted documentation received and forming part of the development application, except as varied by conditions of this Planning Permit.

2. The shed is approved for non-habitable residential use only and may not be changed without written consent from Council.

3. All stormwater runoff from the proposed shed must be detained by on-site water storage systems and overflow disposed of by means to roadside drain and disposed of by means


that will not result in soil erosion or other stormwater nuisance in accordance with Part 14.4.1 A9 of the Break O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013.

4. A Soil and Water Management Plan must be submitted to Council for approval prior to a Building Permit being issued, prepared in accordance with Guidelines for Soil and Water Management, published by Hobart City Council and available on Council’s website (http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au/webdata /resources/files/Guidelines_for_Soil_and_Water_Management.pdf). All works associated with the development must be conducted in accordance with the approved Soil and Water Management Plan. All worked areas not covered by structures must be promptly and progressively stabilised (eg revegetated) so that they will not erode and/or act as a source of sediment transfer.

5. Reflective materials must not be used as visible external elements in the building and the

colours of external surfaces must be the same shades and tones of the surrounding landscape and vegetation elements in accordance with Part 14.4.1 A7 of the Break O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013.

6. Effluent disposal is subject to a technical assessment and issue of a Plumbing Permit by Council’s Plumbing Permit Authority.

7. The vehicle crossover from the carriageway to the property boundary must be constructed in accordance with the vehicular crossing requirements of the Department of State Growth, Tasmania, and must be financed by the applicant.

8. No works are to commence on the crossover until an Access Works Permit has been issued by the Department of State Growth, Tasmania, for the crossover construction (details can be found at http://www.transport.tas.gov.au/roads/permits/road-access).

9. The driveway must be constructed in a manner that ensures sediment is neither tracked nor eroded across the property boundary.

10. The areas shown to be set aside for vehicle access and car parking must be: a. Completed before the use of the development commences; b. Designed and laid out in accordance with the provisions of Table E6.0 of the Break

O’Day Interim Planning Scheme 2013; c. Provided with space for access, turning and manoeuvring of vehicles on-site to

enable them to enter and leave the site in a forward direction; d. Surfaced with a pervious dust free surface and drained in a manner that will not

cause stormwater nuisance.


12. All conditions of this permit must be completed to the satisfaction of the responsible authority, prior to the completion of the shed on the subject site.



http://www.transport.tas.gov.au/roads/permits/road-access

| 02/17.8.1 Notice of Motion – Nespresso Recycling Facility – Clr J Drummond 19

ADVICE

All underground infrastructure including all forms of water, storm water, power, gas and telecommunication systems must be located prior to the commencement of any on-site excavation and/or construction works. Any works to be undertaken within two (2) metres of any Council owned infrastructure must be done in consultation with Council’s Manager Works and Infrastructure.

Activities associated with construction works are not to be performed outside the permissible time frame listed:

o Monday-Friday 7am to 6pm

o Saturday 9am to 6pm

o Sunday and public holidays 10am to 6pm

FOR Clr J McGiveron, Clr J Tucker, Clr M Osborne, Clr G McGuinness, Clr B LeFevre, Clr M

Tucker AGAINST Clr K Wright, Clr J Drummond, Clr Rubenach-Quinn CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Clr’s Rubenach-Quinn and Drummond abstained from voting and they stated that it was due to not having information to make an informed decision. The Mayor advised the Council that it had now concluded its meeting as a Planning Authority under Section 25 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations.

02/17.7.0 PETITIONS Nil.

02/17.8.0 NOTICES OF MOTION

02/17.8.1 Notice of Motion – Nespresso Recycling Facility – Clr J Drummond MOTION: A report is sought providing advice in accordance with the requirements of Section 65 of the Local Government Act 1993 for the information of Council at a future meeting, and consider any advice as required from relevant State Agencies: That Council provide a Nespresso recycling facility alongside of the Mobile Muster collection point in Council offices. In the alternative, or as well as, investigate placing a box in each of our Waste Transfer Stations.

| 02/17.8.2 Notice of Motion – Request to Take Over Lease on Jetty – Clr M Tucker 20

SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION: Noting the level of interest and positive community responses to a recent post on the Burnie Council Facebook page, regarding the placement of a Nespresso recycling facility in Council offices; and being aware of our own community’s desire to recycle where possible, I made contact with Bev Cummings at Burnie Council. Nespresso provide the recycling boxes, of a similar size to the mobile muster stations, free of charge, and proved willing to work with Council with the provision of images and support to get the recycling message out to the community. Please see attached email from Bev Cumming at Burnie Council for further information. DISCUSSION:

- Clr Drummond stated that Burnie City Council have a recycling station and it works well, it just adds another recycling service to our area.

- Clr McGuinness asked what sort of service do they get? - Clr Rubenach-Quinn stated that it is a great idea to bring to our community at no cost and

it could reduce our landfill. COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.8.1.22 Moved: Clr J Drummond/ Seconded: Clr H Rubenach-Quinn A report is sought providing advice in accordance with the requirements of Section 65 of the Local Government Act 1993 for the information of Council at a future meeting, and consider any advice as required from relevant State Agencies: That Council provide a Nespresso recycling facility alongside of the Mobile Muster collection point in Council offices. In the alternative, or as well as, investigate placing a box in each of our Waste Transfer Stations. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Mayor Tucker removed himself from the Chair and Deputy Mayor McGiveron took the Chair.

02/17.8.2 Notice of Motion – Request to Take Over Lease on Jetty – Clr M Tucker

MOTION: 1. That Council rescind its motion 12/16.14.4 refusing the request to take over the lease of Jetty

020815 from the existing lessee and enter into a new lease arrangement with Crown Land Services for this jetty located between Beauty Bay and Kirwans Beach once all repairs works have been undertaken in accordance with the instructions provided by Crown Land Services to the current lessee.


2. That Council take over the lease of Jetty 020815 from the existing lessee and enter into a new lease arrangement with Crown Land Services for this jetty located between Beauty Bay and Kirwans Beach once all repairs works have been undertaken in accordance with the instructions provided by Crown Land Services to the current lessee.

SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION: As previously advised when this item was originally put to Council in December 2016, Council has been contacted by Crown Land Services asking whether Council was interested in taking the lease of this Jetty as the current lessee is not interested in renewing their lease arrangement with Crown Land Services. The current lessee of this jetty (Lord), no longer wishes to lease the jetty from Crown Land Services. Crown Land Services are asking whether Council would like to take over the lease of this jetty on behalf of the community. Substantial works are currently being undertaken by the current lessee after Crown Land Services advised “this letter is to direct you to repair the jetty so that it is structurally sound, or provide an engineer’s report certifying that it is already structurally sound.” Council has been advised by the current lessee:

1. They have put new piles in, bearers and are working to finish the decking replacement, about 12 boards right out at the end left to go plus fixing down with bugle head screws.

2. They have materials for cross bracing but are waiting for the water to warm up and will then install.

DISCUSSION:

- Mayor Tucker stated that we did not have the full story before us when this item was discussed by Council. Conditions have been put on the current lessee and they have now been met. Mayor Tucker stated that he would hate to see the Council lose a piece of infrastructure.

- Clr Osborne advised that she supported the motion. - Clr Drummond advised that she would like a structural engineer’s report. - Clr Wright stated that it would require handrails and barriers. - Clr LeFevre stated that we do not need a structural engineer’s report. - Clr Wright asked whether we could use our own staff to do works. - Clr LeFevre stated that the jetty is in good condition and that he doesn’t believe that we

need to waste money. - Clr McGuinness stated that we are about to lose Moulting Bay jetty which is similar to this

jetty. Jetties are an asset to our community, this jetty is a replacement of Moulting Bay jetty.

- Clr McGiveron stated that it is hard to get a permit to replace jetties. If the lease is cancelled then the jetty would be removed.

- Clr Drummond stated that the current lessee of the jetty should provide a structural engineers report.

- Clr Osborne stated that the lessee has been asked to do what was required and is MAST compliant.


- Clr Rubenach-Quinn asked for a point of clarification - is this the jetty that would require an extension to make it usable; what is the cost of the extension; is the jetty really needed; how much use does it get; what would be the annual depreciation; we should seek a report first and foreshadowed an amendment to the motion

- Clr McGuinness spoke against the amendment – this is not a fishing jetty it is more a photographic point and he does not believe that we need to extend same.

- Clr Wright spoke for the amendment – we need an in house officers report, and does not believe that we should spend money.

- Mayor Tucker stated that he is against the amendment, it is not relevant for what we are dealing with, we are dealing with the jetty as it is. Grant funding may become available and it has been bought up to Crown Lands standards.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.8.2.23 Moved: Clr M Tucker/ Seconded: Clr M Osborne 1. That Council rescind its motion 12/16.14.4 refusing the request to take over the lease of Jetty

020815 from the existing lessee and enter into a new lease arrangement with Crown Land Services for this jetty located between Beauty Bay and Kirwans Beach once all repairs works have been undertaken in accordance with the instructions provided by Crown Land Services to the current lessee.

2. That Council take over the lease of Jetty 020815 from the existing lessee and enter into a new

lease arrangement with Crown Land Services for this jetty located between Beauty Bay and Kirwans Beach once all repairs works have been undertaken in accordance with the instructions provided by Crown Land Services to the current lessee.

An amendment was moved: 02/17.8.2.24 Moved: Clr H Rubenach-Quinn / Seconded: Clr J Drummond That Council seek a report as to the cost to extend the jetty for a further 15 metres and the cost of depreciation. FOR Clr K Wright, Clr J Drummond, Clr H Rubenach-Quinn AGAINST Clr J McGiveron, Clr J Tucker, Clr M Osborne, Clr G McGuinness, Clr B LeFevre, Clr M

Tucker LOST The original motion was put: FOR Clr J McGiveron, Clr J Tucker, Clr M Osborne, Clr G McGuinness, Clr B LeFevre, Clr M

Tucker AGAINST Clr K Wright, Clr J Drummond, Clr H Rubenach-Quinn CARRIED Mayor Tucker resumed the Chair.

| 02/17.11.1 Mayor’s Communications for Period Ending 16 January 2017 23

02/17.9.0 COUNCILLOR’S QUESTIONS ON NOTICE Nil.

02/17.10.0 COUNCILLOR’S QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE Regulation 29 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2005 specifies that in putting a Question Without Notice a Councillor must not offer an argument or opinion, draw any inference or make any imputations except so far as may be necessary to explain the question. The Chairperson must not permit any debate of a Question without Notice or its answer.

Nil.

02/17.12.0 MAYOR’S & COUNCILLOR’S COMMUNICATIONS

02/17.11.1 Mayor’s Communications for Period Ending 16 January 2017

25.01.17 St Helens – Bendigo Bank Launch

26.01.17 St Helens – Australia Day Celebrations

01.02.17 St Helens – Meeting with Local Government Association (LGAT) President nad Chief Executive Officer

03.02.17 Derby – Meeting with Minister Guy Barnett

06.02.17 St Helens – Council Workshop

07.02.17 St Marys – Morning tea St Marys Day Centre – Dr Cyril Latt

08.02.17 Hobart – Meeting with Premier Will Hodgman, and East Coast Tourism. Discuss Blue Derby Stage 2 and the request for State Government support.

09.02.17 Mathinna – TasWater community briefing about regional town water supply strategy

16.02.17 St Helens – Meeting with Cassie O’Connor (Leader of the Tasmanian Greens Party) and Rosalie Woodruff (Greens MP) – discuss East Coast issues including impacts of the sewage spills

17.02.17 Launceston – LGAT General Meeting

20.02.17 St Helens – Council Meeting

| 02/17.11.2 Councillor’s Reports for Period Ending 20 February 2017 24

02/17.11.2 Councillor’s Reports for Period Ending 20 February 2017 This is for Councillors to provide a report for any Committees they are Council Representatives on and will be given at the Council Meeting.

St Helens and Districts Chamber of Commerce and Tourism – Mayor Mick Tucker/Clr Barry LeFevre

- Report from January meeting. - The main discussion points were;

o The Tobruk- disappointment expressed regarding losing the bid. It was felt that the State Government could have been more supportive. Further bids are likely in the future.

Council was acknowledged for their continual support. o Considerable discussion about promotional material for our area and the associated

costs, outlets and who should be promoted ie members vs non-members. There will be the potential for businesses to purchase new advertising in the next run of pamphlets.

o Questions were raised regarding the Binalong Bay Foreshore Master Plan. Is it a draft only with little action or will it be enacted, become policy and acted on? Barry LeFevre and Glenn McGuinness offered to meet with the General Manager on Chamber’s behalf to clarify the situation, including the possible provision of snack food near the wharf area, after numerous requests from tourists.

o The question was asked 'why can't agencies get together in the one room and work through issues co-operatively'. This was widely supported by the group.

o Chamber was appreciative of Craig Lockwood's presentation at the last meeting and very sympathetic to the plight of the Oyster Growers at the time of the meeting.

NRM Special Committee – Clr Margaret Osborne No meeting held

Barway Committee – Clr John McGiveron

- No change - meeting scheduled for the 22 March 2017. - Currently there are three (3) channels. - MAST at the next meeting will advise which channel will have remedial work undertaken

on it.

Regional Tourism Organisation (RTO) – Clr Glenn McGuinness - RTO is a constituted Board – he is a board member and unable to report on everything

which has happened at the Board level. - Facebook page RTO has reached 90,000 people in seven (7) days. Australia, UK and USA are

the top countries. - Bay of Fires is ahead of Freycinet. - Review done of the Tourism Awards – strong preference to continue the Gala Awards

event. - Chinese signage will not be occuring. - Disappointed by lack of engagement with our community in relation to the Destination

Action Plan after the launch. It was suggested that somebody may need to run with this Plan as the Plan needs to be taken forward and there are strong recommendations within the document.

| 02/17.12.1 Corporate Services Department Report 25

- Had a meeting with Council officers who gave a presentation on mountain biking in our municipality. People on the RTO were blown away with what is proposed, it is very exciting and the RTO a strong supportive of this project.

Titley Shack & Binalong Bay Reference Group – Clr Glenn McGuinness No report – no meeting.

Mental Health Action Group – Clr Barry LeFevre - Mental Health Action Group meeting was held on the 17 February 2017. - Trish O'Duffy was acknowledged for her community work and winning the recent Australia

Day Award. - It was acknowledged that given we are a non-funded volunteer group we had an

outstanding year providing many tangible opportunities for our community. - Discussion took place regarding a comprehensive planning meeting in the near future to

map our plans and direction for 2017. This may be late afternoon to enable greater participation.

- Feedback was obtained from the recent Coroner's Office visit. Whilst the group found the session informative further discussion around future initiatives/plans would have been beneficial.

o We will re-contact the Health Department who were going to supply speakers but unfortunately didn't.

- There was a lengthy discussion about the provision of PHT funding. What will happen to our services, where will the gaps be if funding is reduced and what action should be taken to make sure our concerns are heard?

02/17.12.0 BUSINESS AND CORPORATE SERVICES

02/17.12.1 Corporate Services Department Report

FILE REFERENCE 018\018\001\

OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the report be received. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this report is to provide Councillors with an update of various issues which have been dealt with in the Business and Corporate Service Department since the previous Council Meeting. DISCUSSION: No discussion of significance took place on this item.

| 02/17.12.2 Monthly Financial Report 26

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.1.25 Moved: Clr J Tucker/ Seconded: Clr M Osborne That the report be received. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.2 Monthly Financial Report


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the following reports for the month ending 31 January 2017 be received:

1. Trading Account Summary 2. Profit and Loss Statements 3. Financial Position 4. Cash Flow 5. Capital Expenditure

INTRODUCTION: Presented to Council are the monthly financial statements. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services went through the budget when the budget was reviewed – nothing has changed since then.

- Clr LeFevre stated that there are two (2) figures in the budget as follows: o Kirwans jetty – CD805 - $7,500 o Jetty Upgrade - CD830 - $110,000

Can these two (2) amounts be amalgamated? and do we need to put in extra for jetties for the future?

- The General Manager advised that we will look at those particular items during the budget process.

- Clr Osborne agrees with Clr LeFevre – Parkside has something wrong with it and it needs to be fixed.

- Mayor Tucker stated that we need to have money set aside through the budget process to fix these jetties.

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that we need to have money set aside for a particular asset, not necessarily for jetties.

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that we identify works requirements via the Asset Management Plan and if something goes wrong we adjust to react. Clr J Tucker stated that he agrees with the Manager Corporate Services, we have an Assessment Management Plan, we need to stick to it.

| 02/17.12.3 Visitor Information Centre Report 27

- Clr LeFevre asked if anything is going to happen with Young Street? The General Manager stated that he would check on status and report back to Council.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.2.26 Moved: Clr K Wright/ Seconded: Clr J Tucker That the following reports for the month ending 31 January 2017 be received:

1. Trading Account Summary 2. Profit and Loss Statements 3. Financial Position 4. Cash Flow 5. Capital Expenditure

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.3 Visitor Information Centre Report


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the report be received. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this report is to provide Councillors with an update of various issues which are being dealt with by the Visitor Information Centre. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services advised that within the History Room report the comments back from a visitor spoke volumes about how the History Room is working.

- Mayor Tucker stated that the numbers are down, it is more of a retail outlet which is what appears to be happening.

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that this is not the intention of what should be happening, numbers are down through the door, but the town is not a reflection of what is happening. People are not visiting centres, there is more online usage for location of services.

- Clr Wright stated that there might be a lot of repeat guest visitors who have already been there.

| 02/17.12.4 Review of LG11 – Rating Exemptions and Remissions Policy 28

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.3.27 Moved: Clr B Le Fevre/ Seconded: Clr K Wright That the report be received. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.4 Review of LG11 – Rating Exemptions and Remissions Policy


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt Policy LG11 Rating Exemptions and Remissions as amended. INTRODUCTION: Council has a schedule for regular review of Policies. This Policy is now overdue for review according to that Schedule, Council having adopted an annual review period. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that this policy was reviewed at the workshop. There is not much change to policy, just reflecting a couple of decisions of Council and a change of the General Manager’s delegation in line with the policy.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.4.28 Moved: Clr G McGuinness/ Seconded: Clr J McGiveron That Council adopt Policy LG11 Rating Exemptions and Remissions as amended. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.5 Review of LG18 – Debt Collection Policy


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt Debt Collection Policy as amended. INTRODUCTION: Council has a schedule for regular review of Policies. This Policy is not due for review until August 2017.

| 02/17.12.6 Review of LG20 – Distribution of Unclaimed Funds Policy 29

DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services advised that this policy was not due for review for a little while however there have been issues with the time taken for mail delivery between ratepayers.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.5.29 Moved: Clr J Tucker / Seconded: Clr J Drummond That Council adopt Debt Collection Policy as amended. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.6 Review of LG20 – Distribution of Unclaimed Funds Policy


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt Policy LG20 Distribution of Unclaimed Funds as amended. INTRODUCTION: Council has a schedule for regular review of Policies. This Policy is now due for review according to that Schedule, being three (3) years since the last review. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that this policy is unchanged, however it was due for review and policy works fine therefore there are no suggested changes.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.6.30 Moved: Clr J McGiveron/ Seconded: Clr K Wright That Council adopt Policy LG20 Distribution of Unclaimed Funds as amended. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

| 02/17.12.7 Review of LG27 – Information Management Policy 30

02/17.12.7 Review of LG27 – Information Management Policy


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt Policy LG27 Information Management as amended INTRODUCTION: Council has a schedule for regular review of Policies. This Policy is now due for review according to that Schedule, being three (3) years since the last review. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that this policy did not require a lot of changes. COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.7.31 Moved: Clr J Tucker / Seconded: Clr M Osborne That Council adopt Policy LG27 Information Management as amended CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.8 Review of LG29 – Privacy Policy


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt Policy LG29 Privacy as amended. INTRODUCTION: Council has a schedule for regular review of Policies. This Policy is now due for review according to that Schedule, being three (3) years since the last review. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that this policy had very little change.

| 02/17.12.9 Review of LG37 – Telephone Answering Procedure Policy 31

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.8.32 Moved: Clr J Tucker/ Seconded: Clr H Rubenach- Quinn That Council adopt Policy LG29 Privacy as amended. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.9 Review of LG37 – Telephone Answering Procedure Policy


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council cancel Policy LG37 Telephone Answering Procedure and replace this with Procedure LG37 Telephone Answering. INTRODUCTION: Council has a schedule for regular review of Policies. This Policy is now due for review according to that Schedule, being three (3) years since the last review. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that he was recommending that the policy be changed to a procedure.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.9.33 Moved: Clr H Ruebanch-Quinn / Seconded: Clr K Wright That Council cancel Policy LG37 Telephone Answering Procedure and replace this with Procedure LG37 Telephone Answering. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.10 Review of LG41 – Customer Service Charter


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Policy LG41 Customer Service Charter as amended be adopted.

| 02/17.12.11 Budget Review as 31 December 2016 32

INTRODUCTION: Council has a schedule for regular review of Policies. This Policy is required to be reviewed every two (2) years by the Local Government Act. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services stated that this had some changes which were discussed at the Council Workshop which included the inclusion of Council’s facebook page.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.10.34 Moved: Clr K Wright / Seconded: Clr M Osborne That Policy LG41 Customer Service Charter as amended be adopted. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.12.11 Budget Review as 31 December 2016


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council receive the Budget Estimates 2016/2017 Review as at 31 December 2016 and the following variances be applied to the original 2015/2016 budget as set by Council Minute:

Amend Capital Expenditure (brackets denote an adverse variance) $

CE025 Dual Cab Ute not replaced 38,000

CE030 Replacement of Canter upgraded using Dual Cab Ute funds (19,000)

CE080 Additional Desktop Computers (6,000)

CE760 Heat Pump for Server Room (3,000)

Community Stadium Projectors (14,000)

CE745 Bus Shelter Beaumaris 5,000

Resheeting annual allocation 30,000

CE310 Resheeting Eddystone Point Road, Ansons Bay (60,000)

CE305 Resheeting North Ansons Bay Road (30,000)

CD305 Resheeting Mathinna Plains Road 60,000

Reconstruct Argyle/Elizabeth St Intersection, Mangana (5,000)

CC210 Cornwall Road Bridge (40,000)

CD201 Ryans Road Bridge (Scamander River) carried forward to 2018/2019 353,995

CC605 St Helens Waste Transfer Station Retaining Wall & Platform (90,000)

TOTAL 219,995

| 02/17.12.11 Budget Review as 31 December 2016 33

Amend Profit and Loss Items (brackets denote an adverse variance ) $

1792 Financial Assistance Grant 54,359

1794 Grant – DPIPWE – Lottah to Poimena Road 217,540

1796 Grant – LGAT – Asset Management 5,000

1791 Grant – Community Stadium Projectors 14,000

1793 Grant – Cornwall Bridge 110,000

1795 Grant – Waste Oil Recovery 2,617

1897 Materials (Flood repairs & Lottah – Poimena Road grant works) (138,000)

1971 Contractors (Flood repairs & Lottah – Poimena Road grant works) (189,000)

1997 Professional Fees – Strategic Plan (49,000)

TOTAL 27,516

TOTAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT (133,291)

INTRODUCTION: The 2016-2017 budget has been reviewed by senior managers, recognising carry forwards from 2015-2016, grants received subsequent to budget adoption, additional capital expenditure items, identifying compensating actions and other operational adjustments. DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Corporate Services advised that this is a comprehensive six (6) month review with changes to what we are doing around capital and operational matters ie the recognition of grants and flooding issues.

- Clr Rubenach-Quinn asked for clarification around Poimena Road – The Manager Corporate Services advised that there would be no negative impact on the budget.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.12.11.35 Moved: Clr K Wright / Seconded: Clr J McGiveron That Council receive the Budget Estimates 2016/2017 Review as at 31 December 2016 and the following variances be applied to the original 2015/2016 budget as set by Council Minute:

Amend Capital Expenditure (brackets denote an adverse variance) $

CE025 Dual Cab Ute not replaced 38,000

CE030 Replacement of Canter upgraded using Dual Cab Ute funds (19,000)

CE080 Additional Desktop Computers (6,000)

CE760 Heat Pump for Server Room (3,000)

Community Stadium Projectors (14,000)

CE745 Bus Shelter Beaumaris 5,000

Resheeting annual allocation 30,000

CE310 Resheeting Eddystone Point Road, Ansons Bay (60,000)

CE305 Resheeting North Ansons Bay Road (30,000)

CD305 Resheeting Mathinna Plains Road 60,000

Reconstruct Argyle/Elizabeth St Intersection, Mangana (5,000)

CC210 Cornwall Road Bridge (40,000)

| 02/17.13.1 Works and Infrastructure Report 34

CD201 Ryans Road Bridge (Scamander River) carried forward to 2018/2019 353,995

CC605 St Helens Waste Transfer Station Retaining Wall & Platform (90,000)

TOTAL 219,995

Amend Profit and Loss Items (brackets denote an adverse variance ) $

1792 Financial Assistance Grant 54,359

1794 Grant – DPIPWE – Lottah to Poimena Road 217,540

1796 Grant – LGAT – Asset Management 5,000

1791 Grant – Community Stadium Projectors 14,000

1793 Grant – Cornwall Bridge 110,000

1795 Grant – Waste Oil Recovery 2,617

1897 Materials (Flood repairs & Lottah – Poimena Road grant works) (138,000)

1971 Contractors (Flood repairs & Lottah – Poimena Road grant works) (189,000)

1997 Professional Fees – Strategic Plan (49,000)

TOTAL 27,516

TOTAL BUDGET ADJUSTMENT (133,291)

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.13.0 WORKS AND INFRASTRUCTURE

02/17.13.1 Works and Infrastructure Report


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the report be received by Council. INTRODUCTION: This is a monthly summary update of the works undertaken through the Works and Infrastructure Department for the previous month and a summary of the works proposed for the coming month, and information on other items relating to Council’s infrastructure assets and capital works programs. DISCUSSION:

- The Works Supervisor advised that the works at Wrinklers and Four Mile Creek will be finished this week.

- Clr LeFevre asked for clarification from the December Council meeting in relation to St Helens Point Road from the Quarry to Blanche Beach – the road work has still not been repaired. The Works Supervisor advised that the work is still to be undertaken by MAST and they have engaged a Contractor for the works..

| 02/17.13.2 Animal Control Report 35

- Clr McGiveron stated that he sent a message to MAST on behalf of Fishing Club asking when the work on St Helens Point Road is to be undertaken.

- - Clr McGuinness asked if we were aware of any closures at Trout Creek Road, have Parks &

Wildlife Services closed this off because there was so much damage done by campers? The Works Supervisor stated that he thinks it has been closed however he will look into it.

- The General Manager advised that he believed Trout Creek road closure was due to the Ryans Road bridge flood damage and closure..

- - Clr McGiveron raised concerns about the quality of the seal at the end of St Marys, it is

rough, noisy and poor job and noted that Council argued for a better quality seal. Clr Osborne stated that the Mayor and GM should be talking to State Growth. The Works Supervisor agreed with what is being said. The seal is not what was said it would be. Clr Drummond stated that it is really bad, worse than before it was done. The General Manager advised that we can write expressing our disappointment and noting the comments. Clr Osborne stated that we should talk to the Politicians who represent our municipality and let them know that we are not happy, they assure us that it is going to be better and then do something like that.

- Clr J Tucker stated that the Weeds Officer provided a positive report and enquired about the mobile app? The Works Supervisor advised that he was not sure what it was used for, maybe for information to be related through an app. Clr Drummond stated that it is used by Green Army for uploading GPS of weeds etc and overlay. The General Manager stated that if it is a company sponsored app, it may be free. The Planning Coordinator advised that the NRM Facilitator has access to the app.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.13.1.36 Moved: Clr M Osborne / Seconded: Clr K Wright That the report be received by Council. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.13.2 Animal Control Report


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the report be received by Council. INTRODUCTION: This is a monthly update for animal control undertaken since the last meeting of Council.

| 02/17.14.1 Community Services Report 36

DISCUSSION:

- The Works Supervisor stated that the Dog Control Officer has been quite busy over the last month – last two (2) weeks things have quietened down.

- The Works Supervisor stated that we need to increase signage in certain areas, this would make it better for the Dog Control Officer to address issues.

- Clr Wright asked whether there was any follow up from the incident on the 27 January 2017 regarding two (2) dogs chasing shorebirds near Tidal Waters. The Works Supervisor advised that the Dog Control Officer did speak to the owners.

- Clr LeFevre stated that it is positive that the Dog Control Officer has done additional hours and varied times.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.13.2.37 Moved: Clr G McGuinness / Seconded: Clr B Le Fevre That the report be received by Council. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Meeting adjourned for morning tea at 10.58 am Meeting resumed after morning tea at 11.08 am Clr Osborne not yet returned to the meeting at 11.08am Clr Osborne returned to the meeting at 11.10am

02/17.14.0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

02/17.14.1 Community Services Report


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the report be received. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this report is to provide Councillors with an update of various issues which are being dealt with by the Community Services Department.

| 02/17.14.2 Binalong Bay Foreshore Master Plan – Foreshore Pedestrian Link 37

DISCUSSION:

- The Manager Community Services advised that a meeting took place which also included the General Manager and Manager Corporate Services with the Scamander Sports Complex Committee regarding the lease for the facility.

- Australia Day Event was the best in History, a big thank you to Erica Lowry. COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.14.1.38 Moved: Clr J Tucker / Seconded: Clr J McGiveron That the report be received. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.14.2 Binalong Bay Foreshore Master Plan – Foreshore Pedestrian Link


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: 1. That Council extend their current lease area of the Binalong Bay Foreshore to include Grants

Lagoon and Skeleton Bay. 2. Once Council enters into a new lease arrangement, that Council commences planning for the

development of a foreshore walkway. INTRODUCTION: The Binalong Bay Foreshore Master Plan was undertaken in 2014 in consultation with the community. Council will need to complete a Reserve Activity Assessment (RAA) for any proposed development along the foreshore and Parks & Wildlife have suggested that we look at the project as a whole. DISCUSSION:

- Clr Wright stated that there should be more community consultation. - Clr Osborne stated that there has already been extensive consultation on this. - Clr LeFevre stated that the people want action not more consultation. Clr McGuinness

agreed with Clr LeFevre and stated that the Chamber want to see the MMP (Municipal Management Plan) enacted.

| 02/17.14.3 Break O’Day Bike Project 38

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.14.2.39 Moved: Clr M Osborne / Seconded: Clr B LeFevre 1. That Council extend their current lease area of the Binalong Bay Foreshore to include Grants

Lagoon and Skeleton Bay. 2. Once Council enters into a new lease arrangement, that Council commences planning for the

development of a foreshore walkway. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.14.3 Break O’Day Bike Project


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council support the running of a 12 month trial period to run the Break O’Day Bike Club Project. INTRODUCTION: Council has the opportunity to support a project to engage young people in our municipality and for those engaged to develop some skills. DISCUSSION:

- Clr LeFevre stated that he was fully supportive but asked why the person is being paid for six (6) hours and only two (2) hours are face to face? The Manager Community Services advised that there is preparation work involved as well, however she will clarify this.

- Clr Rubenach-Quinn asked who would be employing this person? The Manager Community Services advised they would be employed by Council.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.14.3.40 Moved: Clr M Osborne / Seconded: Clr J McGiveron That Council support the running of a 12 month trial period to run the Break O’Day Bike Club Project. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

| 02/17.14.4 Catering Fit-Out of Bendigo Bank Community Stadium (Bendigo BOCS) 39

02/17.14.4 Catering Fit-Out of Bendigo Bank Community Stadium (Bendigo BOCS)


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION:

Council consider the provision of funding as part of formulating the 2017-18 Council budget. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an update on demand for the Stadium use for larger scaled events and the requirements for catering supply which currently cannot be met anywhere along the whole of East Coast of Tasmania for larger scaled intra and interstate events (more than 200 attendees). DISCUSSION: No discussion of significance took place on this item. COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.14.4.41 Moved: Clr M Osborne / Seconded: Clr J Tucker That Council consider the provision of funding as part of formulating the 2017-2018 Council budget. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.15.0 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

02/17.15.1 Development Services Report


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the report be received. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this report is to provide Councillors with an update of various issues which have been dealt with by the Development Services Department since the previous Council meeting.

| 02/17.15.2 Planning Approvals Issued 40

DISCUSSION:

- Clr Rubenach-Quinn asked why the item in regards to the nomenclature of Royals Lane is not progressing? This will be followed up by Council staff.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.15.1.42 Moved: Clr B Le Fevre/ Seconded: Clr G McGuinness That the report be received. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.15.2 Planning Approvals Issued

Received.

02/17.15.3 Building Services Approvals Received.

02/17.16.0 GOVERNANCE

02/17.16.1 General Manager’s Report


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the General Manager’s report be received. INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this report is to provide Councillors with an update of various issues which are being dealt with by the General Manager and with other Council Officers where required. DISCUSSION:

- The General Manager advised that there were 25 community members the Mayor and Deputy Mayor at the Taswater meeting at Mathinna. Taswater talked about the quality of the water and the options that they have ie a treatment plant at Mathinna or pipeline from Fingal. It was a positive meeting, there were a few side issues raised including concerns around water quality.

- LGAT General Meeting last Friday – strategic planning session – reviewing the document – engaged with members to get our thoughts and what the issues were.

| 02/17.16.1 General Manager’s Report 41

- Strategic plan process was progressing through the process to engage a Consultant, community engagement will commence late March and Council workshops will start around the same time.

- Clr Drummond asked in relation to the RFDS and the PHT funding. o The General Manager advised that there is a meeting on the 10 March, and that the

Hub4Health have been advised of the funding amounts, however changes may need to be made in relation to the reduced funding as the Hub4health have high administration costs compared to others.

o Clr Drummond stated that they have cut the administration costs by 35% this places the Hub4health in a difficult situation. Clr Drummond advised that there is transitional funding currently in place until end of March therefore they are unable to do budgeting as they are unsure of the funding.

o The General Manager advised that he is unable to defend PHT, there are other departments involved as well which is causing delays.

o Clr Osborne stated that three (3) years ago they were told there will be a change to the funding regime.

o The General Manager advised that the Hub4Health have been advised of the funding for the next 18 months – 6 months – then 12 months.

o Clr Drummond stated that the mental health funding was meant to be announced last week and they have heard nothing from PHT. Hub4Health don’t know if they can continue to provide these services.

o Clr LeFevre stated that he agrees with Clr Drummond around the uncertainty of services being provided. As Chair of the mental health action group he is being asked what is happening in relation to services.

o Clr Drummond stated that as a community we look to be losing quite heavily in relation to services – providing local services by local people.

o Clr Osborne asked who at the RFDS is Council dealing with? o The General Manager advised they are dealing with John Kirwan and Nicole Grose

and he advised of funding and direction that we are taking, they are more than happy to talk to Council – to look at where health delivery services are going.

o Clr Osborne asked are the RFDS talking to local people who are delivering the services on the ground.

o The General Manager stated that John Kirwan has said that he is more than happy to talk to Council and talk to Hub4Health Board about health services. The Federal Government were not going to fund the same services, the focus was shifted, organisations that did not look at a different model were not funded. They worked towards a model to benefit the whole community, we need to look at funding to meet community needs, funding programs change and need to move with the times and the best possible services from the community.

o Clr LeFevre stated that some services on paper through the data would be taken away, therefore they did not support the services that were visiting.

o Clr Drummond stated that Diabetes funding has been given to Diabetes Tasmania and the educator and dietician will be serviced from Hobart.

o The General Manager stated that there is opportunity for Hub4Health to talk to the provider about how they can work together.

o Clr McGuinness stated that John Kirwan has indicated that he would be happy to talk to Councillors – we should have a meeting.

o Clr J Tucker stated that some people can come and talk to us and all organisations should be invited to attend.

| 02/17.16.2 Gaming Control Act Community Interest Test – Discussion Paper 42

o Mayor Tucker stated that it may be a bit unfair to have everyone in attendance. o Clr J Tucker stated that the facts need to be got out to these groups. o Mayor Tucker stated that John Kirwan will be invited to address Council. o The General Manager stated that John Kirwan can let us know what insight is going

on, we will try and arrange a meeting for the 10 March when he is down here, PHT will be down here as well.

o Clr Drummond stated that it would be very positive to have a meeting, it would also be very positive for them to be invited to speak with the Hub4Health Board.

o Clr LeFevre stated that we need to keep it local – services provided – building a rapport with local service providers – got to go local.

o Clr Drummond stated that she is on the Hub4Health Board as a private individual not as a Councillor.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.16.1.43 Moved: Clr M Osborne/ Seconded: Clr K Wright That the General Manager’s report be received. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.16.2 Gaming Control Act Community Interest Test – Discussion Paper


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the Break O’Day Council respond to the discussion paper on Community Interest Test Relevant Matters under the Gaming Control Act 1993 advising that Council supports the introduction of a community interest test process to all applications for a Licensed Premises Gaming Licence. INTRODUCTION: Council received correspondence from the Tasmanian Liquor and Gaming Commission advising that the Tasmanian Government has enacted changes to the Gaming Control Act 1993. The discussion paper provides Council with the opportunity to provide feedback on the matters proposed and responses to the specific questions raised in the discussion paper. Submissions must be made by close of business on Monday 27 February 2017. DISCUSSION: No discussion of significance took place on this item.

| 02/17.16.3TasWater – Consultation Issues Paper – Price and Service Plan 3 (December 2016) 43

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.16.2.44 Moved: Clr M Osborne / Seconded: Clr K Wright That the Break O’Day Council respond to the discussion paper on Community Interest Test Relevant Matters under the Gaming Control Act 1993 advising that Council supports the introduction of a community interest test process to all applications for a Licensed Premises Gaming Licence. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

02/17.16.3 TasWater – Consultation Issues Paper – Price and Service Plan 3 (December 2016)


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the Break O’Day Council respond to the TasWater PSP3 Consultation Issues Paper advising as follows: 1. The Council broadly supports the priorities and directions outlined in the Paper. 2. There is no strategy to address stormwater infiltration issues which can be substantially

affecting the capacity of the sewage network to cope. 3. That TasWater must provide the highest priority to sewage scheme upgrade works where the

failure of infrastructure can result in a significant economic loss to a local industry, e.g. the oyster industry in Georges Bay at St Helens.

4. Construction standards should be reviewed to address the concerns which have been

expressed regarding the complexity of the designs which are being proposed or implemented. 5. Service standard monitoring needs to be expanded to include response times to Councils and

developers seeking permission from TasWater to undertake works. INTRODUCTION: Council received correspondence from TasWater which advises Council that the Tasmanian Economic Regulator has determined the regulatory period for TasWater’s third Price and Service Plan to be 1 July 2018 to 30 June 2021. The consultation paper seeks feedback from Council on the key issues for the 2018-2021 regulatory period. Submissions must be made by close of business on Friday 17 February 2017.

| 02/17.16.3TasWater – Consultation Issues Paper – Price and Service Plan 3 (December 2016) 44

DISCUSSION:

- Mayor Tucker stated that everyone is watching and reading the newspaper and watching the news, the Treasurer will be making a statement this afternoon. Mayor Tucker’s personal belief is that the Government will try to take TasWater over as Government business, and this will result in the loss of the dividend that we receive from Taswater.

- The General Manager stated that Local Government has agreed to a reduction of dividends resulting in a reduction of, $200,000 starting in 2018-19, if the State Government take it over we will lose over $500,000 which will result in reduced cash flow to maintain our services, this will affect the community.

- The General Manager stated that the consultation paper underpins what Taswater need to fix our issues. The Minister is demanding that everything should happen now in relation to fixing the delivery of services – Council has discussed this and this is our response to the consultation paper.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.16.3.45 Moved: Clr J Drummond / Seconded: Clr B Le Fevre That the Break O’Day Council respond to the TasWater PSP3 Consultation Issues Paper advising as follows: 1. The Council broadly supports the priorities and directions outlined in the Paper.

2. There is no strategy to address stormwater infiltration issues which can be substantially

affecting the capacity of the sewage network to cope. 3. That TasWater must provide the highest priority to sewage scheme upgrade works where the

failure of infrastructure can result in a significant economic loss to a local industry, e.g. the oyster industry in Georges Bay at St Helens.

4. Construction standards should be reviewed to address the concerns which have been

expressed regarding the complexity of the designs which are being proposed or implemented. 5. Service standard monitoring needs to be expanded to include response times to Councils and

developers seeking permission from TasWater to undertake works. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Clr Drummond left the meeting at 11.56am

| 02/17.16.4 Redistribution of Legislative Council Electoral Boundaries 45

02/17.16.4 Redistribution of Legislative Council Electoral Boundaries


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That the Council advise the Legislative Council Electoral Redistribution Tribunal that it rejects the proposed boundary redistribution on the following basis: 1. That it has been presented as a fait accompli with no other options canvassed or presented

for consideration. 2. It has failed to take into account the community of interest which exists along the length of

the East Coast and between the communities of the East Coast. 3. It has also failed to consider a broader redistribution involving the Launceston based

electorates which could bring the George Town area into Apsley. That Council express its disappointment that the opportunity to access the complex mapping software to examine options for redistribution was effectively only available in Hobart except for a few hours in the north. This is despite the statements on availability in the proposal paper which was provided. INTRODUCTION: Late November 2016 Council became aware of an advertisement which was circulated in the three (3) daily newspapers in Tasmanian advertising the 2016/2017 Legislative Council Boundary Redistribution. On the 28 January 2017 the Redistribution Proposal was advertised for public comment inviting persons and/or organisations to make, comment, suggestion or objection in relation to the Initial Redistribution Proposal by close of business on the 25 February 2017. DISCUSSION:

- The General Manager Noted that no other options have been canvassed within the Discussion Paper. The opportunity to look at modelling has been offered to be provided at Campbell Town this Wednesday (Launceston Cup Day) and seemed to be a token effort.

- The General Manager also stated that he understands that NTD have provided a submission more broadly around Launceston but including some issues around McIntyre, we can present at the hearing as we have provided a submission.

| 02/17.16.5 Review as at 31 December 2016 – Break O’Day Council Annual Plan 2016/2017 46

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.16.4.46 Moved: Clr J McGiveron / Seconded: Clr M Osborne That the Council advise the Legislative Council Electoral Redistribution Tribunal that it rejects the proposed boundary redistribution on the following basis: 1. That it has been presented as a fait accompli with no other options canvassed or presented

for consideration. 2. It has failed to take into account the community of interest which exists along the length of

the East Coast and between the communities of the East Coast. 3. It has also failed to consider a broader redistribution involving the Launceston based

electorates which could bring the George Town area into Apsley. That Council express its disappointment that the opportunity to access the complex mapping software to examine options for redistribution was effectively only available in Hobart except for a few hours in the north. This is despite the statements on availability in the proposal paper which was provided. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Clr Drummond returned to the meeting at 11.59am

02/17.16.5 Review as at 31 December 2016 – Break O’Day Council Annual Plan 2016/2017


OFFICER’S RECOMMENDATION: That Council endorse the Review as at the 31 December 2016 of the Break O’Day Council Annual Plan 2016 / 2017. INTRODUCTION: The Annual Plan is a requirement of Section 71 of the Local Government Act 1993 as follows: An Annual Plan is to –

(a) be consistent with the strategic plan; and (b) include a statement of the manner in which the Council is to meet the goals and objectives

of the strategic plan; and (c) include a summary of the estimates adopted under section 82; and (d) include a summary of the major strategies to be used in relation to the Council’s public

health goals and objectives.

| 02/17.16.5 Review as at 31 December 2016 – Break O’Day Council Annual Plan 2016/2017 47

DISCUSSION:

- The General Manager went through the Annual Plan with Council page by page providing opportunity for discussion if required.

COUNCIL DECISION: 02/17.16.5.47 Moved: Clr B Le Fevre / Seconded: Clr J Tucker That Council endorse the Review as at the 31 December 2016 of the Break O’Day Council Annual Plan 2016 / 2017. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Pursuant to Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015 that Council move into Closed Council.\

Moved: Clr J McGiveron / Seconded: Clr M Osborne That Council move into Closed Council. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

| 02/17.17.1 Outstanding Actions List for Closed Council 48

02/17.17.0 CLOSED COUNCIL

02/17.17.1 Outstanding Actions List for Closed Council

02/17.17.2 Contract 030\001\097\ - 2016/2017 Bridge Replacement Package2016 - Closed Council Item Pursuant To Section 15(2)D Of The Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015

02/17.17.3 Contract 030\001\098\ - Design & Construction of Bridge 1128, Ryans Road Bridge, Scamander River - Closed Council Item Pursuant To Section 15(2)D Of The Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2015

Pursuant to Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2005 that Council move out of Closed Council.

Moved: Clr J McGiveron / Seconded: Clr J Drummond: That Council move out of Closed Council. CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Mayor Tucker thanked everyone for their attendance and declared the meeting closed at 12.25pm. ……………………………………….. MAYOR ……………………………………… DATE

IN CONFIDENCE

COUNCIL MINUTES Monday 20 February 2017 - bodc.tas.gov.au · Planning Coordinator, Paula...

Documents

Transcript of COUNCIL MINUTES Monday 20 February 2017 - bodc.tas.gov.au · Planning Coordinator, Paula...