Cost of Quality Section A

download Cost of Quality Section A

of 46

Transcript of Cost of Quality Section A

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    1/46

    COSTOF QUALITY

    Aashish AroraAgrim Verma

    Gaurav Saini

    Vilay Gupta

    MBA General (A)

    Submitted To:-

    Prof. Parmjit Kaur

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    2/46

    IMPORTANT DEFINITIONSOF QUALITY

    American Society for Quality: A subjective term for which eachperson has his or her own definition. In technical usage, quality canhave two meanings:

    i. The characteristics of a product or service that bear on its ability tosatisfy stated or implied needs;

    ii. A product or service free of deficiencies. Philip B. Crosby: Conformance to requirements . The requirements

    may not fully represent customer expectations; Crosby treats this asseparate problem.

    Peter F. Drucker: Quality in a product or service is not what thesupplier puts in. It is what the customer gets out and is willing to pay

    for. ISO 9000: Degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfil

    requirements. The standard defines requirement as need orexpectation.

    Six Sigma: Number of defects per million oppurtunities.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    3/46

    COSTOF QUALITY

    Quality Costing is the sum of costs incurred by the

    company in preventing poor quality, the cost incurred

    to ensure that the quality requirements are being met,

    and any other costs incurred as a result of poor qualityproducts.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    4/46

    TOTAL QUALITYMANAGEMENT

    TQM is the strategic commitment to improve quality

    by combining statistical quality control methods with

    a cultural commitment to seeking incremental

    improvements that increase productivity and lower

    cost.

    - Deming and Juran

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    5/46

    ISO 9000

    Developed by the International Organisation for

    Standardisation is a set of five international

    standards for quality management adopted by more

    than 85 countries.

    ISO 9000 was created to enable companies to

    effectively document and certify their quality system

    elements.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    6/46

    Consumers may focus on SPECIFICATION QUALITY of

    a product/service or how it compares to competitors in themarketplace.

    Producers might measure the CONFORMANCE

    QUALITY or degree to which the product/service wasproduced correctly.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    7/46

    Prevention

    Actions taken toensure that a

    process providesquality productsand services.

    Most cost effectiveway to controlquality.

    Appraisal

    Measuring thelevel of quality

    attained by theprocess.

    These costs areincurred duringproduction andprior to deliveries

    to customers.

    Failure

    To correct qualityin products and

    services before(internal) orafter(external)delivery to thecustomer.

    PAF MODEL

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    8/46

    USESOFQUALITYCOSTREPORT

    Firstly, the quality cost information helps managers

    see the financial significance of defects.

    Secondly, quality cost information helps managers

    identify the relative importance of the quality

    problems faced by the firm.

    Quality Cost information helps managers see

    whether their quality costs are poorly distributed. In

    general, quality costs should be distributed more

    towards prevention and appraisal activities and lesstowards failures.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    9/46

    JURANS COSTOF QUALITY GRAPH

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    10/46

    ROLEOF QUALITY

    COSTING

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    11/46

    APPLICATIONSOF QUALITY COSTING

    Operational level

    Managerial level

    Strategic policy level

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    12/46

    ICEBERGMODEL

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    13/46

    CONCEPT

    Decision making

    Return on Investment (ROI)

    Return on Quality (ROQ)

    Identification of Cost Drivers Identification of potential areas for improvement

    Move from Cost Accounting to Cost Management

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    14/46

    OBJECTIVES

    Maximise quality whilst minimising cost.

    Measure cost of quality.

    Aim to control and reduce it.

    Continually monitor it as a measure of progress.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    15/46

    COST OF QUALITY MODELSGeneric Model Cost/Activity categories

    P-A-F Model Prevention + appraisal + failure

    Crosbys model Prevention + appraisal + failure +opportunity

    Opportunity or intangible cost models Conformance + non-conformance

    Conformance + non-conformance +

    opportunity

    Tangibles + intangibles

    P-A-F (failure cost includes

    opportunity cost)

    Process cost models Conformance + non-conformance

    ABC models Value-added + non-value-added

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    16/46

    CROSSBYS MODEL

    It is similar to the P-A-F model.

    It sees quality as conformance to requirements

    Defines CoQ as the sum of price of conformance(PoC) and price of non-conformance (PoNC).

    The price of conformance is the cost involved inmaking certain that things are done right the firsttime, which includes actual prevention andappraisal costs

    The price of non-conformance is the money wastedwhen work fails to conform to customerrequirements, usually calculated by quantifying thecost of correcting, reworking or scrapping, whichcorresponds to actual failure costs.

    O O O

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    17/46

    OPPORTUNITYOR

    INTANGIBLECOSTMODELS Intangible costs are costs that can be only

    estimated such as profits not earned because oflost customers and reduction in revenue owing tonon-conformance.

    This model emphasizes the role of intangible costwithin the overall quality cost scheme.

    In this group of models intangible or opportunitylosses cost is incorporated into a typical P-A-Fmodel.

    Opportunity losses may be broken down into threecomponents: underutilization of installed capacity,inadequate material handling and poor delivery ofservice

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    18/46

    PROCESSCOSTMODEL

    It represents quality cost systems that focus on

    process rather than products or services.

    Process cost is the total cost of conformance and

    non-conformance for a particular process.

    The CoC is the actual process cost of providing

    products or services to the required standards, first

    time and every time, by a given specified process.

    The CoNC is the failure cost associated with a

    process not being operated to the required

    standard

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    19/46

    CONTD...

    These costs can be measured at any step of the process. Accordingly, it can be determined whether high non-

    conformance costs show the requirement for further

    expenditure on failure prevention activities or whether

    excessive conformance costs indicate the need for a process

    redesign. The use of a process cost model is suggested as a preferred

    method for quality costing within TQM as it recognizes the

    importance of process cost measurement and ownership, and

    presents a more integrated approach to quality than a P-A-F

    model.

    This model also helps in continuous improvement policy on

    key processes within the organization and innovates where

    appropriate

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    20/46

    STRUCTUREOF PROCESSCOSTMODEL

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    21/46

    ACTIVITYBASEDCOSTING MODEL

    Prevention-appraisal-failure (PAF) approach (both old andnew) and process cost approach are the two main approachesto measuring CoQ. However, these approaches still cannotprovide appropriate methods to include overhead costs inCoQ systems

    These deficiencies could be overcome under activity-basedcosting (ABC) developed by Cooper and Kaplan of HarvardBusiness School.

    ABC uses the two-stage procedure to achieve the accuratecosts of various cost objects (such as departments, products,customers, and channels), tracing resource costs (includingoverhead costs) to activities, and then tracing the costs ofactivities to cost objects.

    It is an alternative approach that can be used to identify,quantify and allocate quality costs among products, andtherefore, helps to manage quality costs more effectively.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    22/46

    ABC CONTD...

    It can be easily concluded that the PAF approach ofCoQ is activity-oriented, the process cost approachof CoQ is process-oriented, and ABC is activity-oriented for the cost assignment view and process-

    oriented for the process view.An integrated CoQ-ABC framework was proposed

    in 1998 and it was stated that the cost and non-financial information achieved from the integratedCoQ-ABC system can be used to identify the

    magnitude of the quality improvement opportunities,to identify where the quality improvementopportunities exist, and to continuously plan thequality improvement programs and control qualitycosts .

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    23/46

    TWO-DIMENSIONALMODELOF ABC

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    24/46

    Six Sigma

    Sigma

    Is a measurement Scale upon which improvements can be

    gauged.

    Six Sigma

    Is a methodology that drives business improvement.

    Is a management System for governing the high impact

    improvement efforts.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    25/46

    Some of the Six Sigma Companies

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    26/46

    DMAIC

    Definethe project goals and customer (internal and external) deliverables

    Measurethe process to determine current performance

    Analyzeand determine the root cause(s) of the defects

    Improve the process by eliminating defects

    Contro lfuture process performance

    When To Use DMAIC

    When a product or process is in existence at your company but is notmeeting customer specification or is not performing adequately.

    The causes are not explicitly known.

    The project is strategically important

    DEFINE MEASURE ANALYSE IMPROVE CONTROL

    What is

    impor tant ?

    How are we

    doing ?

    What is

    wrong ?

    What needs

    to be done ?

    How do we

    guarantee

    performance ?

    Six Sigma Models - DMAIC

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    27/46

    Road Map Six Sigma Implementation

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    28/46

    Techniques For Identifying And Analyzing

    Quality Problems

    Control Chart

    Pareto Diagram

    Cause & Effect Diagrams

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    29/46

    Control Chart

    Graph of a series of successive observations of a particular

    step, procedure, or operation taken at regular intervals of time.

    Indicates upper and lower statistical control limits, and an

    average line, for samples or subgroups of a given process.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    30/46

    Ways to analyze pareto data

    Pareto Chart-A way to stratify data.

    Pareto Analysis is used to organize the data to show which major

    factors make up the subject being analyzed. Frequently it is

    referred to as the search for significance.

    The Pareto chart is arranged with its bars descending in order,

    beginning from the left.

    The basis for building a Pareto is the 80/20 rule. Typically,

    approximately 80% of the problem(s) result from approximately20% of the causes.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    31/46

    Ways to analyze pareto data

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    32/46

    Cause & Effect Diagrams

    Invented by Professor Kaoru Ishikawa of Tokyo University.

    Also called the fishbone diagram.

    The most frequently recurring and costly problemsidentified by the Pareto diagram are analyzed using these

    diagrams.

    The major purpose of the CE Diagram is to act as a first

    step in problem solving by generating a comprehensivelist of possible causes.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    33/46

    Cause & Effect Diagrams

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    34/46

    Other tools of quality control

    Check sheet

    The scatter diagram

    Flow chart

    The histogram

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    35/46

    Check sheet

    The check sheet is a document used for

    collecting data in real-time and at the location

    where the data is generated.

    The document is typically a blank form that isdesigned for the quick, easy, and efficient

    recording of the desired information, which can

    be either quantitative or qualitative.

    When the information is quantitative, thecheck sheet is sometimes called a tally sheet.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    36/46

    Check sheet

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    37/46

    Scatter Diagram

    A tool for analyzing relationships between two

    variables.

    It can suggest various kinds of correlations

    between variables with a certain confidence

    interval.

    A scatter diagram is used to prove or disprove

    cause and effect relationship.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    38/46

    Scatter Diagram

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    39/46

    Flow chart

    Aflow chart reflects the cause and effect and the

    sequential linkage among various process

    activities.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    40/46

    HISTOGRAM

    A Histogram is a graphic summary of variation in a

    set of data.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    41/46

    Quantify the size of the quality problem.

    Identify major opportunities for cost reductions.

    It helps in Identification of opportunities for reducing customer

    dissatisfaction and associated threats to product saleability.

    Measures the results of quality improvement activities.

    Align quality goals with organizational goals.

    Set Cost Reduction Targets.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    42/46

    The system is more complex

    Different types of expenses and allocation of expensesDifferent forms and formulas to collect the data and preparing the reports.

    It is expensive

    Installing and maintaining cost accounting system requires more man powerand resources.

    If the expenses incurred in ascertaining the cost is more than what is derived

    from it, then the process of cost accounting is meaningless.

    Not suitable for small scale unitsThrough the traditional accounting, small scale units can control the cost

    effectively.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    43/46

    Need preparation of frequent reconciliation to verify accuracy

    Preparation of reconciliation statements with financial accounts

    Leads to unnecessary increase in workload.

    Does not control Cost by itself

    It only bring out the possibility of areas which needs control.

    If the organization does not have a efficient management, the reports and

    results brought out by the cost accountant is useless.

    Lack of cooperation of employees:

    Depends heavily on the cooperation of employees concerned. Lack of

    cooperation of employees will affect the overall results.

    Inapplicability of costing method and technique

    Differ from organization to organization

    Depends on the nature of business and the type of service/product

    manufactured by the firm.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    44/46

    It serves the information need of the management

    It only serves the requirement of information needed by the management not by

    shareholders etc.

    Duplication of Work

    Many industrial units function effectively and control the cost effectively with the

    financial accounting. Preparing cost accounting is unnecessary for them and it

    involves duplication of accounting work.

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    45/46

  • 7/29/2019 Cost of Quality Section A

    46/46