Cost Analysis of Levofloxacin IV Compared to Other Guideline

download Cost Analysis of Levofloxacin IV Compared to Other Guideline

of 4

Transcript of Cost Analysis of Levofloxacin IV Compared to Other Guideline

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Analysis of Levofloxacin IV Compared to Other Guideline

    1/4

    Cost Analysis of Levofloxacin IV Compared to

    Other Guideline-endorsed Therapies for

    Patients

    Hospitalized with Community-acquired

    Pneumonia

    Objective:

    Levofloxacin IV (LEV) has been shown to

    reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients

    hospitalized with community-acquired

    pneumonia (CAP) compared to other Infection

    Diseases

    Society of America/American Thoracic Society

    guideline-recommended antibiotic regimens,

    including moxifloxacin (MOX) and ceftriaxone(CEF) plus azithromycin (AZT) combination

    therapy. This study aimed to estimate the

    budgetary impact of utilizing LEV in a hospital

    formulary for methods.

    Methods:

    The Excel-based model was designed to

    be flexible, transparent, and user-friendly. The

    model

    was developed in accordance with the Good

    Research Practices for Budget Impact Analysis

    disseminated by the International Society for

    Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

    (ISPOR).

    Model inputs included:

    Annual hospital admissions for CAP.

    Current proportional share of CAP antibiotic

    regimens (i.e., current resource utilization of

    LEV,

    MOX, CEF, and AZT combination therapy, and

    other antibiotic regimens). Future proportional share of CAP antibiotic

    regimens (i.e., future resource utilization of LEV,

    MOX, CEF, and AZT combination therapy, and

    other antibiotic regimens).

    CAP antibiotic drug costs.

    Average LOS.

    Hospital costs per day.

    Model outputs included:

    Estimated LOS under future resource

    utilization.

    Estimated annual total hospitalization costs

    under current and future resource utilization.

    Estimated annual total pharmacy costsunder current and future resource utilization.

    Average hospitalization costs per treated

    patient under current and future resource

    utilization.

    Absolute and percentage cost savings in

    hospital budget compared to current resource

    utilization.

    Key assumptions included the following:

    Increased use of LEV does not alter the

    number of hospital admissions.

    Treatment duration is the same as hospitalLOS.

    A schematic of the model design is provided in

    Figure 1.

    FIGURE 1: Budget Impact Model Flow Diagram

    Using the Model

    Users were able to input hospital-

    specific data and calculate budget impact for

    the hospital of interest by comparing thecurrent resource utilization with the future

    resource utilization.

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Analysis of Levofloxacin IV Compared to Other Guideline

    2/4

    Base-case Analysis

    Prevalence and Hospital Utilization Data

    1,000 patients with CAP were

    assumed to be hospitalized per year.

    The current and future utilization ofeach CAP antibiotic regimen were hypothetical

    numbers selected for the purpose of illustration

    (Table 1).

    CAP Antibiotic Costs Data

    Drug costs per day (Table 2) were

    based on wholesale acquisition cost.

    The cost for combination therapy

    was calculated as the sum of CEF and AZT costs.

    Hospital LOS Data

    Current average LOS for each CAP

    case was calculated as 5.2 days, based on thenational

    summary in the Diagnosis Related

    Group of Simple Pneumonia and Pleurisy Age

    >17 in the

    2007 Medicare Provider Analysis and

    Review (MEDPAR) records.1

    Published data were observed on

    shorter LOS with use of LEV compared to MOX

    (5.83 vs. 6.38 days with 0.54 days or 8.48%

    reduction),2 or compared to the CEF and AZT

    combination therapy (4.6 vs. 5.4 days with 0.8

    days or 14.81% reduction).3 The user was allowed to choose

    how to apply the LOS reduction (absolute

    reduction or relative reduction) due to use of

    LEV compared to MOX and the combination

    therapy.

    The absolute LOS reduction due to

    LEV was applied in this analysis (Table 3).

    The method to calculate average LOS

    under the future resource utilization varied with

    the type of LOS reduction applied.

    With absolute LOS reduction, thefuture average LOS was the current average LOS

    adjusted by the days saved from increased

    utilization of LEV.

    With relative LOS reduction, the

    future average LOS also depended on the LOS

    associated with LEV.

    LOS associated with LEV was

    derived based on the current average LOS,

    relative LOS

    reduction due to LEV, and currentresource utilization, with the assumption that

    LOS associated with other antibiotic regimens

    was the same as the current average LOS.

    Hospitalization Costs

    The current total hospitalization

    costs were the product of current hospital cost

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Analysis of Levofloxacin IV Compared to Other Guideline

    3/4

    per day,current average LOS, and total number

    of hospitalized CAP patients.

    Current average LOS and total

    number of hospitalized CAP patients were user

    inputs as described previously.

    Current hospitalization cost per day(2007 US dollars) was calculated as $1,327

    based on the same data source for hospital LOS

    (MEDPAR data1).

    The current total pharmacy costs

    were assumed to account for 12% of the total

    hospitalization costs, derived from

    MEDPAR data.1

    Current utilization of LEV, MOX, and

    CEF and AZT combination therapy were

    normalized to calculate the total costs of CAP

    antibiotic treatments.

    The difference between the total

    pharmacy costs and the CAP antibiotic costs

    was defined as other pharmacy costs.

    The future total hospitalization

    costs were the sum of future pharmacy costs

    and future non-pharmacy costs.

    The future total pharmacy costs

    were the sum of future CAP antibiotic costs and

    future other pharmacy costs.

    Future utilization of LEV, MOX, and

    CEF and AZT combination therapy were

    normalized to calculate the total costs of CAP

    antibiotic treatments.

    Future other pharmacy costs were

    the product of future average LOS and the daily

    other pharmacy costs derived under current

    resource utilization.

    The future non-pharmacy costs

    were the product of future average LOS and the

    daily

    non-pharmacy costs derived under current

    resource utilization (i.e., [total

    currenthospitalization costs total current

    pharmacy costs]/current average LOS)

    Model results

    By increasing LEV utilization from 30% to

    60%, the overall annual hospital budget was

    estimated to decrease by 3.91% or $270,143

    ($270 per patient).

    The majority of the savings came from

    shorter LOS due to use of LEV, where the

    average

    LOS per patient was estimated to decrease by3.87% or 0.2 days.

    Savings in total pharmacy costs were a small

    fraction of the savings in total hospital costs

    (13% or $35,423).

    Savings in total pharmacy costs included

    savings from CAP antibiotic costs (8.62% or

    $6,193)

    and savings from other pharmacy costs (3.87%

    or $29,230).

    Scenarios with a greater proportion of LEV

    use resulted in larger savings to the hospital

    budget ($540 per patient under the utilization

    of 90% LEV, 0% MOX, 0% CEF and AZT

    combination therapy, and 10% other antibiotic

    regimens).

  • 7/28/2019 Cost Analysis of Levofloxacin IV Compared to Other Guideline

    4/4