Cost Allocaton

download Cost Allocaton

of 22

Transcript of Cost Allocaton

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    1/22

    1

    COST ALLOCATION

    A reference to help with cost

    allocation.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    2/22

    2

    Course Objective Learn how to correctly apply your cost

    allocation plan to your center.

    Learn how to implement your costallocation plan and document costsbased on your plan.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    3/22

    3

    Allocating Costs

    If an organization has only one activity that is

    funded by one funding source and if all costsassociated with the organization are for thatactivity, no allocation is needed.

    If an organization has multiple activities, and oneor more funding sources, a cost allocation isneeded.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    4/22

    4

    Direct CostsDirect costs are those which are clearly and

    easily attributable to a specific program.

    Examples of direct cost are:

    Employee time devoted to one or moreactivity.

    Materials purchased for one or more activity. Equipment bought for a specific activity.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    5/22

    5

    Indirect CostIndirect costs are those which are not easily

    identifiable with a specific program, but which

    are, nonetheless, necessary to the operationof the program.

    These costs are shared among programs and,

    in some cases, among functions (program,management and general, and fundraising).

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    6/22

    6

    Indirect Cost Examples

    ExecutiveD

    irectors salary Chief Financial Officers salary

    Single Audit report costs

    Shared office costs, such as rent and utilities

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    7/22

    7

    Why Allocate Indirect Costs to

    the Programs?

    The full cost of a program rightfully includes ashare of the overall costs of theorganization.

    Knowing the full cost of a program sets abasis for financial analysis of the program,

    and for requesting reimbursement fromfunders for the full costs of providingservices.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    8/22

    8

    What Are the Methods for

    Allocating Indirect Costs?

    There are several methods for allocatingindirect costs . The most common are:

    case-by-case allocation,

    developing an indirect cost rate, and Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    9/22

    9

    Case-by-Case Allocation

    One method of allocating indirect costs is to determine a rateof actual usage for each program. For example:

    You may decide to keep track of long distance telephone callsand charge them to the appropriate program when you pay thephone bill each month.

    Some organizations use a counter or log to track copying

    expenses for each program and/or function. Time sheets may form the basis for allocation of salaries for the

    executive director, accountant, and staff whose work benefitsmore than one program or activity.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    10/22

    10

    Case-by-Case Allocation (cont)

    The advantage of this method is that it seemsto make sense.

    A major disadvantage, however, is that it

    often requires a great deal of timeconsuming record keeping.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    11/22

    11

    Case-by-Case Allocation

    (cont)Even if you keep the records needed to precisely

    allocate shared expenses among programs, not all

    expenses will be covered.If, for example:

    The rent is allocated by square feet, how should

    you allocate the hallway and rest rooms?What about local phone calls which can not be

    tracked using a code?

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    12/22

    12

    Developing an Indirect Cost RateThe first step in determining an indirect cost rate

    is to separate all costs into two groups: direct

    and indirect costs.

    The indirect costs are aggregated into anindirect cost pool and then allocated to theprograms based on a set proportion or rate.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    13/22

    13

    Developing an Indirect Cost Rate

    (cont)

    There are several measures used todetermine the proportion of indirect coststo allocate (apply) to each program.

    The following simple example illustrates anindirect cost rate based on the relationship

    between total indirect costs and total directcosts.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    14/22

    14

    Crisis CenterThe Crisis Center has a total budget of

    $3,300. The budget is distributed as

    follows: Program A has direct costs of $1,000.

    Program B has direct costs of $2,000.

    Indirect costs to run the programs isbudgeted at $300.

    Total costs are $3,300.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    15/22

    15

    Crisis Center (cont)

    Since Program As direct costs are one-third of the total direct cost of theshelter center ($1,000 out of $3,000), it should bear one-third of theindirect costs. Similarly, since Program B incurs two-thirds of the total

    direct costs of the shelter center, it should bear two-thirds of theindirect costs, as well.

    An indirect cost rate (using direct costs as a base) is established by dividingthe total indirect costs by the total direct cost.

    Total Indirect costs divided by Total Direct Costs = $300/$3,000=10percent of total costs

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    16/22

    16

    Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)Training/Conferences/

    Seminars-Allocated to the

    programbenefiting fromthe training,conferences orseminars. Thefollowing exampleshows how coststhat benefit twoor more specificprograms, but notall programs.

    Program Grant FTEs % Amount Allocated

    1 A .20 10% $ 500

    3 C .80 40% $2,000

    5 E 1.0 50% $2,500

    Total 2.0 100% $5,000

    Expense Amount = $5,000

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    17/22

    17

    OMB Circular A-122 and UGMSPass-through recipients from the HHSC Family

    Violence Program funding, are required to

    reference the OMB Budget Circular A-122 andUGMS using these same principles.

    However, even within these guidelines, indirect costrates for the same organization may vary fromfederal agency to federal agency.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    18/22

    18

    Direct vs. Indirect AllocationContrary to popular belief, indirect costs are not an

    easy measure of an organizations efficiency.

    Imagine a multi-service agency where eachprogram has its own bookkeeper, purchases itsown supplies, and has all its own equipment.

    Such an organization would have no indirect costsat all, but would be clearly less efficient than ifthe programs shared bookkeeping costs,supplies and equipment.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    19/22

    19

    Final CommentsBecause the presentation of financial information influences the way we access

    a providers finances, the selection of indirect costing methods andaccounting procedures has an important impact on decision-making.

    Several urgent and perhaps conflicting demands are made of the indirectcosting process:

    to attribute indirect costs in the fairest way possible, to attribute the most indirect costs to the programs that can best afford

    them, to eliminate as many indirect costs as possible by having each program buy

    its own supplies, etc.

    Finding a balance among these demands that clears confusion and informsdecision-makers is a responsibility of all participants in the nonprofit sector.

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    20/22

    20

    HHSC Family Violence Program

    Katie Ray-Jones, Program Manager

    512-206-5143

    [email protected]

    Judy Forbes, Program Specialist 512-206-5040

    [email protected]

    Robyn Mobley, Contract Specialist

    512-206-5137

    [email protected]

    Susie Roberts, Contract Manager 512-206-5517

    [email protected]

    Humphrey Matthews, Contract Manager

    512-206-5123

    [email protected]

    Helen Oh, Contract Manager

    512-206-5565

    [email protected]

    Sandra Steward, Program Specialist

    512-206-5125 [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    21/22

    21

    Budget RevisionsThe HHSC Family Violence Program allows each provider to

    submit a budget revision to ensure your grant monies are fullyexpended.

    According to the HHSC FVP contract, Article 13, Section 13.06 (j),a budget revision should be submitted:

    only for allowable expenses,

    does not contradict other rules or policies, or

    indicate a change in the scope of the contract.

    All budget revisions must be submitted using HHSC FVP BudgetRevision forms (included in the Excel BudgetWorkbook).

  • 8/6/2019 Cost Allocaton

    22/22

    22

    Budget Revisions (cont)

    If the total amount of the budget revision is:

    less than 5.0% of the contract amount or $5,000, (or aprorated portion if the contract term is less than one year,whichever is lower), the budget revision must besubmitted within 30 days of implementation.

    More than 5.0% of the contract amount or $5,000, (or a

    prorated portion if the contract term is less than one year,whichever is lower), the budget revision must besubmitted prior to implementation and approved by theCommission.

    Retroactive budget revisions will not be accepted by HHSC.