Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

26
Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect and mean-field dynamo effect I. Rogachevskii, N. Kleeorin, A. Brandenburg, & D. Eichler (ApJ, submitted)

description

Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect. I. Rogachevskii, N. Kleeorin, A. Brandenburg , & D. Eichler (ApJ, submitted). MHD plasma with CRs. To be solved with induction equation and continuity equation, isothermal EOS. Introduces pseudoscalar. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

Page 1: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effectand mean-field dynamo effect

I. Rogachevskii, N. Kleeorin, A. Brandenburg, & D. Eichler(ApJ, submitted)

Page 2: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

2

MHD plasma with CRsMHD plasma with CRs

FEBJU

eic nnePt

1

ecri nnn cr4 JJB c

FBUBJBU

crcr1

41 enP

t c

To be solved with induction equationand continuity equation, isothermal EOS

Page 3: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

3

Introduces pseudoscalarIntroduces pseudoscalar

effect 0cr BJstarsin effect gΩ

/JbuBUB

t

... Bbu E

... jijjiji JB E

effect important for large-scale field in the Sun

Page 4: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

4

Comparison: alpha effect & inverse cascade in MHD (no CRs)

decaying turbulence forced turbulence

Here: magnetic helicity of opposite signs at small and large scale!

Page 5: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

5

Bi-helical fields from UlyssesBi-helical fields from Ulysses

• Taylor hypothesis– Broad k bins– Southern latitude with

opposite sign

• Small/large distances– Positive H at large k– Break point with

distance to larger k

Brandenburg, Subramanian, Balogh, & Goldstein (2011, ApJ 734, 9)

Page 6: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

6

Bell instabilityBell instability22cr42AzcB vkk

B

J

0cr

4 / kBJcJ

Bell (2004): J=2 Zirakashvili et al (2008): J=16

Continued growth in both cases! effect important?

Page 7: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

7

New simulationsNew simulations

• 5123 resolution, non-ideal (Re=Lu < 300)

• larger J parameter (80 and 800)

• most unstable k /k1= 40 and 400 (unresolved)

• measure alpha and turbulent diff. tensor

• Related to earlier work by Bykov et al. (2011)

Page 8: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

8

Bell instability Bell instability turbulence ( turbulence (JJ=80)=80)

Page 9: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

9

AnimationAnimation

Page 10: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

10

Power Power spectraspectra

• Bell mode ~25k1

• k4 spectrum

• k-5/3 at late time turbulence

Page 11: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

11

Spectral growthSpectral growth

Page 12: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

12

3 stages3 stages

• Bell instability,small scale, k/k1=40

• Accelerated large-scale growth

• Slow growth after initial saturation

Page 13: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

13

IsotropizationIsotropization

Page 14: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

14

Growth of length scaleGrowth of length scale

Page 15: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

15

Alpha tensor (test-field method)Alpha tensor (test-field method)

parallel

perp

Page 16: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

16

Normalized alpha effectNormalized alpha effect

crcr / 4/ Jc

Scales with kinetic helicity, prefactor ~0.5

Page 17: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

17

Dynamo number, turb diffDynamo number, turb diff

Critical value 1, turb diff >> microscopic value

Page 18: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

18

JJ and resolution dependence and resolution dependence

Larger resolution runs longer, can scale to higher J

Page 19: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

19

Equipartition ratio: Equipartition ratio: JJ dependent dependent

Page 20: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

20

Instantaneous Instantaneous growth rategrowth rate

• Agrees with non-ideal theory

• Amplification by many orders of magnitude

• Box Reynolds number ~ 1000

Page 21: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

21

Convergence of alphaConvergence of alpha

Page 22: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

22

Conclusions

• Growth by many orders of magnitude

• effect and turbulent diffusivity tensors

• dynamo number > 1 at late times

• k-5/3 spectrum at late times

• growth at larger length scales

• numerically converged

Page 23: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

23

Inverse cascadeInverse cascade

Page 24: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

24

Animation (poor)Animation (poor)

Page 25: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

25

Animation5Animation5

Page 26: Cosmic ray current-driven turbulence and mean-field dynamo effect

26

Inverse cascade of magnetic helicityInverse cascade of magnetic helicity

kqp EEE |||||| kqp HHH and

||2 pp HpE ||2 qq HqE Initial components fully helical: and

||||||2|||| qpkkqp HHkHkEHqHp

),max(||||

||||qp

HH

HqHpk

qp

qp

argument due to Frisch et al. (1975)

k is forcedto the left