Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

download Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

of 6

Transcript of Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

  • 8/14/2019 Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

    1/6

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruptionsaynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruptionsaynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruptionsaynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    saynotocorruptionsaynotocorruptionsaynotocorruptionsaynotocorruption

    Corruption Motivesof

    Agus Sjafiin Panemicro and semi-macro approach

    Ellen Maharani

    12 - 09460004964

  • 8/14/2019 Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

    2/6

    Page | 2

    Introduction

    Crime has been committed by different motives, so has corruption as one of white-

    collar crime. Criminals might claim several reasons to justify their motives, but some others

    choose to confess. By the classification of motives we say that a murderer kill someone

    might stand for several reasons such as defending, doing revenge or being commanded by

    other. Pick-pockets, shop-lifters, thieves, robbers, and corruptors, even if they all commit

    the same crime called stealing in general, they come from different social-level. Corruptors,

    for example, they come from upper level of social status but they still steal the money of the

    state. Like quote said, life is always enough to fulfill humans need but not their greed. This

    paper would analyze the motives that trigger corruptors especially Agus Sjafiin Pane to

    commit punitive measure of corruption through micro and semi-macro approach.

    Case in a nutshell

    Agus Sjafiin Pane (later, we will call Sjafiin), a functionary of green-line document-

    examiner in Kantor Pelayanan Utama of Directorate General of Customs and Excise, was

    presumed routinely receiving bribes. The Bribery had been given for simplifying the

    procedures of analyzing-point processing and issuing approval letters of import-commodity

    releasing (Surat Persetujuan Pengeluaran Barang). This crime was detected while Internal

    Compliance Team of Directorate General of Customs and Excise together with the Team

    from Commission Eradication Corruption were suddenly inspecting the office of Kantor

    Pelayanan Utama on May 30th

    2008. From the inspection, they found some money about

    the amount of Rp 87,5 millions, USD 1.000, AUD 50, and SGD 23. The money was presumed

    from some of importirs weekly or monthly bribery. By the presumption, Sjafiin was

    prosecuted for three years six months of prison and 250 millions of fine for breaking the

    Article 12th section (b) Corruption Act (UU No. 31 Tahun 1999 which had been amended by

    UU No. 20 Tahun 2001 about Pemberantasan Tipikor).

    An analysisWe would examine and analyze factors that trigger punitive measure of corruption

    through micro and semi-macro approach. Micro approach would examine the case of Sjafiin

  • 8/14/2019 Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

    3/6

    Page | 3

    based on Vroomand Maslowtheories. Semi-macro would examine the case of Sjafiin

    based on Klitgaardand Torrestheories. At the end, we hoped that this analysis would

    give additional information and contribution to society in order to know first and later

    minimize the punitive measure of corruption to optimize the eradication and the

    enforcement of the Law.

    Based on the equation formulated by Victor Vroom,performance is the function

    of ability multiply with inner motivation. Motivation itself is consist of expectation and

    valance. By the theory, if we want to increase someones positive performance, we have to

    assure the positive substances ofabilityand motivation (also expectation and valance). If we

    analyze Sjafiin, we might conclude that he has positive ability. Positive ability with high-

    intelectuality standardly characterized for almost all functionaries of the green-line

    document-examiner in Kantor Pelayanan Utama of Directorate General of Customs and

    Excise. To be accepted as functionary even just ordinary employee in Kantor Pelayanan

    Utama of Directorate General of Customs and Excise, everyone had to pass the assessment

    tests. The chosen people there are usually them who are profesional and have high-integrity

    character, so is Sjafiin. Based on Vroom, if someone want something (expectation) and

    there is a way to get them, he or she will try (motivation) to get (performance) them

    respectively. Sjafiin expected to fulfill his family needs, bring happines to them and also

    expect to be rich. This expectation was somehow still in a positive valance. But then the

    valance might be turned into negative which made Sjafiin permitted all ways even white-

    collar crime like corruption to achieve his expectation. When one substance turned into

    negative, the performance as the result ofabilitymultiply with the motivation, would also

    turn into negative. Once people had been found in committing crime white-collar such as

    corruption, all formerly performance seemed to be nothing for society and everything

    became negative.

    The negative valance might caused by the temptation of money and high-class life-

    style. Abraham Harold Maslow identified five levels of needs in the pyramid

    hierarchy which could be mentioned asphysical needs, security needs, social needs (the first

    three is called the basic needs), self-esteem needs and self-actualization needs. If we looked

    up at the case of Sjafiin, he received bribery ranged from hundred thousands untill hundred

  • 8/14/2019 Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

    4/6

    Page | 4

    millions rupiah. He accepted all rupiahs without any higher bargaining upon. Moreover, in

    such kind of situations he often called importir to give him some money in order to simplify

    the now and the later standard of import-commodity realesing procedures. By then, we

    might conclude that Sjafiin was still trying to accomodate the basic needs of him, his wife

    and his familiy. Once Sjafiin become bribe-receiver in the state of fulfilling the basic needs,

    he would be addicted to continue and later he would become a badly compulser. This bad

    habit continued even Sjafiin had already been accepted in Kantor Pelayanan Utama Tanjung

    Priok that already adopted new system of Customs and Excises excellent service. He poorly

    could not reform his self to the new system of his office. He was still committing bad habit

    of receiving the bribery for simplifying green-line procedures in the document-examination

    phase. The old mind-set was still on him.

    After analyzing in micro approach term, the first semi-macro approach that would be

    discussed is about Klitgaardtheory. Robert Klitgaard, the professor of International

    Development and Security di RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica in California stated that

    corruption might happen as the combination ofmonopoly of powerand discretion by official

    laid down without proper accountability. Sjafiin, as functionary in Kantor Pelayanan Utama

    Tanjung Priok, had enough monopoly power to issue approval letter to release import-

    commodity without additional examination. He had discretion to determine classification of

    importir, as green-line or red-line. By then, he want some more money to increase the

    intensity of simplifying the service or even enabling to release the commodity without

    additional examination. This practice was pretended to be common or usual for Sjafiin. To

    minimize this badly negative practice of bribery, the needs of accountability increasingly

    demanded. This accountabilityof issuing the approval letter, classifying importir in such line

    and making decisions for additional examination should be doubled-increased to equalize

    the monopoly of power and discretion by official. The Internal Compliance Team of

    Directorate General of Customs and Excise are on charge of control this practice. The team

    had already do their best and had to increase and maintain this best performance all and all

    in the name of bureaucracy reformation.

    Ramirez Torresclaimed that corruption is still thriving caused by the mind-set

    of thought. The thought that state reward of corruption is bigger than thepenalty if caught

    even if it is multiply with the probability of being caught. Reward of corruption acquired by

  • 8/14/2019 Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

    5/6

    Page | 5

    Sjafiin was somehow weekly or monthly routine for years. Sjafiin thought that this bad habit

    was usual or common-sense in Directorate General of Customs and Excise because almost

    everyone accept and legalize it. By then, Sjafiin assumed that theprobability of being caught

    drew toward zero or almost impossible. It was so, because bribery in custom is somehow

    like other common practice and everyone thinks that it wont be classified as punitive

    measure. Penalty if caught multiply with the number zero of probability of being caught

    assumption made reward of corruption in the eyes of Sjafiin became so valuable. Every

    hush-money attained, could exceed the nominal of his fifteen millions salary per receiving.

    This fact seemed so okay for him whose basic need had not yet fulfilled. Sjafiin forgot that

    this zero number of probability of being caughtwas rubbed down by the Corruption

    Eradication Commission actions and enforcements day by day. Poorly unfortunately, Sjafiin

    got caught and sentenced for four years prison and 250 millions of fine. His formerly

    assumption went wrong. He made a try again and again by receiving again and again bribery

    in order to fulfill his family basic needs and now he fell down and sentenced.

    Before reformation system of bureaucracy took place, bribery was so common habit

    to simplify procedures especially in Directorate General of Customs and Excise as one of

    composition of high-cost economy harbour. The people there thought that it was common

    practice, nothing was wrong indeed. Based on Torrez, corruptors would like to continue

    this practice until they change their mind that the probability to be caughtmultiply with the

    penalty of being caughtseems to be higher than the reward of corruption itself.

    Conclusion and ClosingTo minimize the punitive measure of corruption, we could classify by the four

    classification of theories namely Vroom, Maslow,Klitgaardand Torres. Based on

    Vroom, we might start to campaignpositive value towards achieving goals through printed

    or electronic media by the statement of motivation or by model figure. Klitgaardhad

    warned society with his equation that shown the existence of monopoly of powermixed by

    official discretion without proper accountability would lead someone into committing

    corruption. He warned us all to increase and double the accountabilityof the state in any

    level of bureaucracy, turn down the monopoly of powerby controlling system and minimize

  • 8/14/2019 Corruption Motives of Agus Sjafiin Pane

    6/6

    Page | 6

    the official discretion through separation of functions. The process of this idealism have to

    be guarded by people that already pass the fulfillment of basic needs based on Maslow

    (put aside greedy people). The last, we can work together with Corruption Eradication

    Commission to achieve the goal of eradicated-corruption of the state. Like the warning of

    Torres, we, the poeple of society, may increase the probability to be caught and the

    institution of Corruption Eradication Commission may optimize the penalty of being caught.

    This will take a process, hard and long process but not impossible if we want to change

    ourself.

    ReferencesFat. 2009. Terdakwa Menerima Suap via Petugas Cleaning Service. Accessed from

    http://cms.sip.co.id/hukumonline/detail.asp?id=21431&cl=Berita

    Git. 2009. Jaksa Tuntut Penyidik Bea Cukai 3,5 Tahun Penjara. Accessed from

    http://antikorupsi.org/indo

    Humas. 2009. Pejabat Bea Cukai Divonis 4 Tahun. Accessed from

    http://www.kpk.go.id/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3244

    Ifa. 2007. Kantor Pelayanan Utama Bea dan Cukai Langkah Strategis Memperbaiki Citra dan

    Kinerja Institusi. Accessed from

    http://www.beacukai.go.id/news/readNews.php?ID=1431

    Siswanto, Purborini. 2009.Agus Sjafiin Pane Hadapi Putusan Sela. Vivanews. Accessed from

    http://korupsi.vivanews.com/news/read/44748-pagi_ini_kasus_agus_sjafiin_pane_

    diputus

    http://cms.sip.co.id/hukumonline/detail.asp?id=21431&cl=Beritahttp://antikorupsi.org/indohttp://www.kpk.go.id/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3244http://www.beacukai.go.id/news/readNews.php?ID=1431http://korupsi.vivanews.com/news/read/44748-pagi_ini_kasus_agus_sjafiin_pane_%20diputushttp://korupsi.vivanews.com/news/read/44748-pagi_ini_kasus_agus_sjafiin_pane_%20diputushttp://korupsi.vivanews.com/news/read/44748-pagi_ini_kasus_agus_sjafiin_pane_%20diputushttp://korupsi.vivanews.com/news/read/44748-pagi_ini_kasus_agus_sjafiin_pane_%20diputushttp://www.beacukai.go.id/news/readNews.php?ID=1431http://www.kpk.go.id/modules/news/article.php?storyid=3244http://antikorupsi.org/indohttp://cms.sip.co.id/hukumonline/detail.asp?id=21431&cl=Berita