Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who...
-
Upload
devon-martindale -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who...
![Page 1: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Corporate Responsibility
5. Stakeholder theory
![Page 2: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Who are the stakeholders?
“Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the firm’s objectives” (Freeman, 1984: 46)
Terrorists? Generations yet unborn? Need for some clarity / distinction – “if everyone is a
stakeholder of everyone else, little value is added by the theory” (Phillips, 2003)
![Page 3: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
More precise definition of ‘affects’ and ‘affected by’ (Evan and Freeman 1993)
Principle of corporate rights - the corporation has the obligation not to violate the rights of others
Principle of corporate effect – companies are responsible for the effects of their actions on others
C&M: “A stakeholder of a corporation is an individual or a group which either: is harmed by, or benefits from, the corporation; or whose rights can be violated, or have to be respected, by the corporation”
![Page 4: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
This might get over the problem of terrorists but still draws a very wide boundary around who the stakeholders are
Legitimacy often used as another test – does the stakeholder have a legitimate claim on the corporation?
![Page 5: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Stakeholder mapping
Power
Low
High
InterestLow High
Minimaleffort
Keepsatisfied
Keepinformed
Keyplayers
![Page 7: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Stakeholder theory of the firm:traditional management model
Firm
Shareholders
EmployeesSuppliers
Customers
![Page 8: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Stakeholder theory of the firm
Firm
Shareholders
EmployeesSuppliers
Customers
Civilsociety
CompetitorsGovernment
![Page 9: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Stakeholder theory of the firm:a network model
Firm
Shareholders
Supplier stakeholder 1
Suppliers
Customers
Civil society
CompetitorsGovernment
Employees
Civil society stakeholder 2
Civil society stakeholder 1
Employee stakeholder 2
Employee stakeholder 1
Customer stakeholder 1
Customer stakeholder 2
![Page 10: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
But the real question is: “In whose interests should the business be run?”
Is it just for the shareholders? Or is there a wider group of stakeholders in
whose interest the business should be run? If so, who are these stakeholders?
![Page 11: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Stakeholder theory generally answers the question “In whose interests should the firm be run?” with “Stakeholders not just shareholders”
This is a distributive view – it doesn’t ask much if anything about the purpose of the firm (so tobacco companies can be excellent at CSR?!)
But something on purpose and values is beginning to emerge: What do we stand for? What are our aspirations?
(Freeman et al. 2007: 86)
![Page 12: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
A typical stakeholder diagram of a firm
FIRM
Shareholders
Customers
Employees
Suppliers
CommunityEnvironment
MediaGovernment
NGOs
CreditorsCompetitors
![Page 13: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Stakeholder division
Stakeholders normally split into two groups – primary / secondary, active / passive, participant / non-participant
One, convincing, division is as follows: Normative stakeholders are those to whom the
organisation has a moral obligation, an obligation of stakeholder fairness because the organisation voluntarily accepts their contribution as part of a mutually beneficial scheme of co-operation.
Derivative stakeholders are those groups whose actions and claims must be accounted for by managers due to their potential effects upon the organisation and its normative stakeholders. (Phillips, 2003)
The normative stakeholders are those in whose interest the business should be run.
![Page 14: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
A refined stakeholder diagram of a firm
FIRM
Shareholders
Customers
Employees
Suppliers
CommunityEnvironment
MediaGovernment
NGOs
CreditorsCompetitors
Normative stakeholders
Derivative stakeholders
![Page 15: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Two issues in stakeholder theory
1. Which stakeholders? The five shown are usually those that are referred to;
environment is the odd one out (can / should the firm be run in the interests of the environment?)
Kaler (2009) has argued for shareholders and employees as the only normative stakeholders
2. Position of management (Directors)? Management as a stakeholder in its own right? But management as responsible for allocating harms
and benefits So management as representative of the firm – at the
centre of a “hub and spoke” model, because they contract with all other stakeholders
![Page 16: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Analysing the stakeholder theory of the firm
Descriptive / empiricalDescriptive / empiricalDescribes the firm as a constellation of co-operative and competitive interests
InstrumentalInstrumentalFirm assumed to have conventional objectives, such as maximisation of shareholder value.Recognition that other stakeholders are instrumental (a means to an end) in pursuit of those objectives
![Page 17: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
NormativeNormativeStakeholders are identified by their interests in the firm.The interests of all (some) stakeholders are of intrinsic valueThe firm should be run in the interests of these stakeholders
ManagerialStakeholder theory offers managers prescriptive solutions to practical problems. It recommends attitudes, structures and practices that, taken together, constitute stakeholder management
(Donaldson & Preston, 1995)
![Page 18: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Descriptive
Instrumental
Normative
Nesting of stakeholder theories
![Page 19: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Stakeholding regarded as …
An end in itself(intrinsic)
Stakeholder theory
A means to an end(instrumental)
Shareholder theory
Stoney & Winstanley (2001)
![Page 20: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Implications
All organisations are stakeholder organisations (descriptively, instrumentally or normatively speaking) – so we need to be clear which ‘level’ we are working at / talking about
The normative basis (which moral principles might be used to justify stakeholder theory) is left open – see Moore (1999)
By implication, the shareholder theory of the firm (the instrumental level) is normatively wrong – but see Moore (1999) again
![Page 21: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Stakeholder theory - summary
[Normative / Pure] “Stakeholder theory is a theory of organisational management and ethics … [and] is distinct because it addresses morals and values explicitly as a central feature of managing organizations … attention to the interests and well-being of some non-shareholders is obligatory for more than the prudential and instrumental purposes of wealth maximisation of equity shareholders.” (Phillips, Freeman & Wicks, 2003)
See Smith (2003) for a good summary of stakeholder vs. shareholder theory
![Page 22: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Or to put it another way …
“Executives ignore stakeholders at the peril of the survival of their companies … All of us need to come to see capitalism and business for what it really is: a system of voluntary social cooperation through which we create value for each other.” (Freeman, 2006)
Freeman in person: http://www.corporate-ethics.org/masters_seminar_business_ethics.htm - “What is stakeholder theory?”
![Page 23: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Pure versions of the rival theories
Pure stakeholder theory
Multi-fiduciary dutiesAccountable to all / somestakeholders or to the corporation
Pure shareholder theory
Single fiduciary dutyAccountable to shareholders alone
(Note: fiduciary duties are duties of trust and care and are sometimes considered to be owed to the firm as an entity rather than to particular stakeholders. Others argue the firm amounts to the shareholders. There is also the issue of it being unethical to be a fiduciary to more than one party where this might involve conflicts of interest.)
![Page 24: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Tinged shareholder theory
It has been argued that neither side has the stronger moral claim (see Moore, 1999)
Tinged shareholder theory as a way forward? – instrumental approach to stakeholding, but moral and social duties added to legal and implied constraints
Directors owe fiduciary duties to shareholders and are accountable to them alone. But take responsibilities to other stakeholders seriously / to the corporation (see also Hampel, 1998)
![Page 25: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Locating tinged shareholder theory
Pure stakeholder theory
Multi-fiduciary dutiesAccountable to all / somestakeholders or to the corporationIntrinsic approach
Pure shareholder theory
Single fiduciary dutyAccountable to shareholders aloneInstrumental approach
Tinged shareholder theorySingle fiduciary duty but responsibilities to otherstakeholders / the corporation as a whole, taken seriously
Tinged shareholder theory = Enlightened shareholder value
![Page 26: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Companies Act 2006
General duties of directors
“A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other things) to –
![Page 27: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
a) The likely consequences of any decision in the long term,
b) The interests of the company’s employees,c) The need to foster the company’s business relationships
with suppliers, customers and others,d) The impact of the company’s operations on the
community and the environment,e) The desirability of the company maintaining a reputation
for high standards of business conduct, andf) The need to act fairly as between members of the
company.”
![Page 28: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Contents of directors’ report: general
“In the case of a quoted company the business review must, to the extent necessary for an understanding of the development, performance or position of the company’s business, include –
a) The main trends and factors likely to affect the future development, performance and position of the company’s business; and
![Page 29: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
b) Information about –
(i) environmental matters (including the impact of the company’s business on the environment),
(ii) the company’s employees, and
(iii) social and community issues,including information about any policies of the company in relation to those matters and the effectiveness of those policies …”
![Page 30: Corporate Responsibility 5. Stakeholder theory. Who are the stakeholders? “Any group or person who is affected by or can affect the achievement of the.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081519/56649c8f5503460f9494811d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
References / reading
Donaldson, T., and L. Preston (1995), ‘The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications,’ Academy of Management Review, 20 (1), 65-91.
Evan, W. & R.E Freeman (1993), A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism, in G. Chryssides & J. Kaler (1993), An introduction to Business Ethics, (London: Chapman & Hall), pp.254-266.
Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: a stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman.Freeman, R.E., (2006), ‘The Wal-Mart effect and business, ethics, and society’, Academy of
Management Perspectives, 20 (3): 38-40. Freeman, R.E., J. Harrison & A. Wicks (2007), Managing for stakeholders. Survival, reputation and
success, New Haven: Yale University Press.Hampel, R. (1998), Committee on Corporate Governance: Final Report, London: Gee & Co. Ltd.Kaler, J. (2009), ‘An optimally viable version of stakeholder theory’, Journal of Business Ethics, 86
(3), 297-312.Mitchell, R., B. Agle & D. Wood (1997), ‘Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience:
defining the principle of who and what really counts’, Academy of Management Review, 22 (4): 853-886.
Moore, G. (1999), ‘Tinged shareholder theory, or, what so special about stakeholders?’, Business ethics, a European Review 8(2), 117-127.
Moore, G. (2007), Podcast on DUO.Phillips, R. (2003), ‘Stakeholder legitimacy’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 25-41.Phillips, R., R.E. Freeman and A. Wicks (2003), ‘What stakeholder theory is not’, Business Ethics
Quarterly, 13(4): 479-502.Smith, J. (2003), ‘The shareholders vs. stakeholders debate’, MIT Sloan Management Review,
Summer, 85-90.Stoney C. & D. Winstanley (2001), ‘Stakeholding: confusion or Utopia? Mapping the conceptual
terrain’, Journal of Management Studies, 38(5), 603-626.