CORPORATE ENERGY & EMISSIONS PLAN 2009

R E G I O N A L D I S T R I C T

SUNSHINE COAST

CORPORATE ENERGY & EMISSIONS PLAN

2009

R E G I O N A L D I S T R I C T

For the 2008 inventory year

R E G I O N A L D I S T R I C T SUNSHINE COAST

CORPORATE ENERGY & EMISSIONS PLAN

2009

Hyla Environmental Services Ltd.R.D. Haycock

400 Capilano Drive, #1708Port Moody, BC V3H 0E1

(604) [email protected]

May 2009

Prepared for:

Sunshine Coast Regional District1975 Field Road

Sechelt, B.C. V0N 3A1

About Hyla Environmental Services Ltd.HES Ltd. specializes in developing corporate and community energy and emissions plans for local government and departments within senior levels of government (regional, provincial, and federal). With over 13 years of dedicated experience to emissions management, HES’ work extends to corporate and community sustainability plans, including integrated community sustainability plans. HES has developed proprietary software, Energy and Emissions Reporting and Monitoring System™ (EEMRS™), which is used to calculate emissions, develop emissions forecasts, and integrate account-level management to produce accurate, cost effective emissions management strategies. HES is a leader in this field having completed over 105 corporate energy and emissions inventories and 21 emissions management strategies. As well, HES produces community-wide energy and emissions inventories for all local government (189) in British Columbia on behalf of the Province of British Columbia’s Ministry of Environment.

HES Ltd. is proud to be a founding reporter of The Climate Registry.

ACRONYMS

CO2 – Carbon Dioxide

CO2e– Carbon Dioxide Equivalent

SCRD – Sunshine Coast Regional District

EEMRS™ – Energy and Emissions Monitoring and Reporting System™

GHG – Greenhouse Gas

HES – Hyla Environmental Services Ltd.

Copyright © 2009, Sunshine Coast Regional District

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recorded or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photographic, sound, magnetic or other, without advance written permission from the owner.

Sunshine Coast Regional District staff are gratefully acknowledged for their efforts in the development of this plan.

Photos provided by Sunshine Coast Regional District

Table of Contents

Executive Summary xi

Introduction 11.0 Plan Development Process 1

1.1 Corporate Programs 1

1.2 Corporate Protocols 2

1.3 The Challenge of Climate Change and Clean Air Planning 3

1.4 Global Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions 3

1.5 Local Benefits of Reducing GHG Emissions 4

1.6 Regional and Local Context 4

1.7 Inventory and Plan Preparation Process and Methods 4

1.8 Report Organization 7

2 Corporate Inventory 92.1 Corporate Inventory Summary 9

2.2 Inventory by Sector 10

2.3 Inventory by Energy Type 11

3 Buildings 143.1 Buildings Overview 14

3.2 Buildings Forecast 15

3.3 Reduction Initiatives 17

3.5 Summary 23

4 Outdoor Lighting 244.1 Outdoor Lighting Overview 24

4.2 Outdoor Lighting Forecast 25


5 Water and Wastewater 275.1 Water & Wastewater Overview 27

5.2 Water and Wastewater Forecast 28


6 Vehicle Fleet 316.1 Vehicle Fleet Overview 31

6.2 Vehicle Fleet Forecast 33


7 Corporate Solid Waste 377.1 Reduction Initiatives 37

8 Summary 38Summary of Corporate Emission Reductions 38

Reduction Target Statement: 38

Glossary of Terms (IPCC 2006) 39

Appendix I - Detailed GHG Emissions Inventory (2008) 40

Appendix II - Detailed GHG Emissions Inventory (2008) - Transit Buses 55

Appendix III - Detailed GHG Emissions Inventory (2008) By Department 56

List of Tables

Table 2.1 – Energy, Costs, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector (2008) 9

Table 2.3.1 – Sources of Corporate Energy & Costs (2008) 11

Table 2.3.3 – Sources of Corporate Emissions (2008) 13

Table 3.1.1 – Summary of Buildings Sector Emissions (2008) 14

Table 3.1.2 – Buildings Ranked by Energy Consumption (2008) 14

Table 3.2.1 – Predicted Buildings Growth 16

Table 3.2.2 – Forecast of Buildings Consumption 16

Table 3.2.3 – Forecast of Buildings Costs 16

Table 3.2.4 – Forecast of Buildings GHG Emissions 17

Table 3.3.1 – Proposed Reduction Initiatives in the Buildings Sector 17

Table 3.5 – Prioritized Implementation in the Buildings Sector by CO2e Reduced 23

Table 4.1.1 – Summary of Outdoor Lighting Sector Emissions (2008) 24

Table 4.1.2 – Outdoor Lighting Ranked by Energy Consumption (2008) 24

Table 4.2.1 – Forecast of Lighting Consumption 25

Table 4.2.2 – Forecast of Lighting Costs 25

Table 4.2.3 – Forecast of Emissions 26

Table 4.3 – Summary of Proposed Reduction Initiatives for the Outdoor Lighting Sector 26

Table 5.1.1 – Summary of Water and Wastewater Sector Emissions (2008) 27

Table 5.1.2 – Water and Wastewater Ranked by Energy Consumption (2008) 28

Table 5.2.1 – Predicted Growth by Sector 29

Table 5.2.2 – Forecast of Water and Wastewater Consumption 29

Table 5.2.3 – Forecast of Water and Wastewater Costs 29

Table 5.2.4 – Forecast of Emissions 29

Table 5.3 – Summary of Proposed Reduction Initiatives for the Water and Wastewater Sector 30

Table 6.1.1 – Summary of Vehicle Fleet Sector Emissions (2008) 31

Table 6.1.2 – Ranking of Vehicle Fleet (2008) 31

Table 6.2.1 – Predicted Growth in the Vehicle Fleet Sector 33

Table 6.2.2 – Forecast of Vehicle Fleet Consumption 33

Table 6.2.3 – Forecast of Vehicle Fleet Costs 33

Table 6.2.4 – Forecast of Vehicle Fleet Emissions 34

Table 6.3.1 – Proposed Reduction Initiatives in the Vehicle Fleet Sector 34

Table 8.1 – Inventory Summary 38

Table 8.2 – Summary of Estimated Impact of Reduction Measures on the Corporate Sectors 38

List of Figures

Figure 1.6 – Local Context for the Sunshine Coast Regional District, British Columbia 5

Figure 2.1 – GHG Emissions (CO2e tonnes) by Sector (2008) 9

Figure 2.2.1 – Consumption by Sector 10

Figure 2.2.2 – Costs by Sector 10

Figure 2.2.3 – GHG Emissions by Sector 11

Figure 2.3.1 – Energy (GJ) by Type 12

Figure 2.3.2 – Costs by Type 12

Figure 2.3.3 – GHG Emissions (tonnes CO2e) by Type 13

Figure 3.1.1 – Costs for Energy in the Building Subsectors (2008) 15

Figure 4.1.1 – Costs for Energy in the Outdoor Lighting Subsectors (2008) 25

Figure 5.1.1 – Costs for Energy in the Water and Wastewater Subsectors (2008) 27

Figure 6.1.1 – Costs for Energy in the Vehicle Fleet Subsectors (2008) 32

This page intentionally blank

Executive Summary

The recommendations within the Sunshine Coast Regional District Corpo-rate Energy & Emissions Plan 2009 constitute the proposed greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction strategy for the Sunshine Coast Regional District (SCRD). Based on the inventory of greenhouse gases completed and the proposed recommendations made, the SCRD can meet the GHG emissions reduction targets described in this report.

Energy use, energy costs and GHG emissions were calculated for the base year (2008) and forecast year (2018) to determine the SCRD’s total potential GHG emissions reduction.

In the base year, the SCRD produced 1,806 tonnes CO2e and consumed

52,230 GJ at a total cost of $988,569 (see table below).

Inventory Summary

Parameter 2008

Energy Consumption 52,230 GJEnergy Costs $988,569Emissions 1,806 tonnes CO2e

Reduction Target Statement:

The Sunshine Coast Regional District can reduce GHG emissions by 27 percent by reducing its 2008 base year emissions quantity by 563 tonnes CO2e by 2018.

Reduction Target SummaryThe reduction target for the SCRD is based on a ten-year period in accor-dance with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Partners for Climate Protection Program. The ten-year reduction targets for the SCRD are pre-sented in the table and figure that follows.

xi

Sector2008 Base

Year Emissions (tonnes CO2e)

2018 Emissions Projection

(tonnes CO2e)

Reductions from 2010-2018

Implementation

Emissions after

Reductions (2018)

Overall Percent

Reduction (2018)

Buildings 1,123 1,179 469 710 -37%

Outdoor Lighting1 7 8 1 7 0%

Water and Wastewater2 81 85 5 80 -1%

Vehicle Fleet 440 444 72 372 -15%

Corporate Solid Waste3 155 159 16 143 -8%

Totals 1,806 1,875 563 1,312 -27%

1 Lighting includes all overhead streetlights owned by the SCRD, sportsfield lighting, parking lots, etc.

2 The estimate in the water and wastewater sector is qualitative

3 Solid waste from all SCRD facilities

Note: the emissions quantities in the graphical representation above for the Business as Usual Emissions Growth (fore-cast) and the Management Program Results (reductions) are hypothetical.

The targets for the building sector are aggressive, with a proposed reduction of 469 tonnes. The majority of this reduction could be achieved through a heat reclamation project that would reduce the amount of natural gas used to heat pool water at the Sechelt Aquatic Centre (note: the estimated reduction for the heat reclamation project is approximately 343 tonnes whereas the total reduction including all reduction initiatives is 408 tonnes).

Greenhouse gas emissions from outdoor lighting are insignificant relative to other sectors due to the low carbon emissions from hydroelectric power in British Columbia. A practical reduction initiative is to install dimmers and/or timers on overhead street lighting grids. LED technology, which offers savings ranging from 30 to 40 percent for over-head street lights, may become economical to implement in the near future and staff should keep apprised of the opportunities during the project period.

The water and wastewater sector will grow over the next ten years, but the majority of the additions to this sector will result in increased electricity consumption, which will not significantly affect the overall greenhouse gas emissions projection due to the low carbon emissions associated with electricity supplied by BC Hydro. The increases in emis-sions in this sector result from the proposed addition to the Chapman Creek Water Treatment Plant.

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

xii

The SCRD is a large area and staff must drive long distances to service rural parts of the district. This makes it difficult to achieve reductions in fuel consumption. The Administration Building and the public works yard could benefit from video conference systems to reduce travel to and from each building. Driver training and reducing the vehicle kilo-metres travelled may be the only practical solution in the short term until newer electric technologies are available from automobile manufacturers.

The SCRD has already implemented several initiatives to reduce corporate solid waste, although further reductions of waste to the landfill may be possible by increasing the types of waste from corporate facilities that can be recycled and composted.

Depending on when the initiatives are implemented, if the SCRD adopts the recommendations outlined in this report, savings of approximately $188,500 per year could be realized by investing approximately $1.85 million. Note that the payback for natural gas is based on the 2008 rate of $12 per GJ (note: includes all charges per GJ of natural gas consumed). As the price of natural gas rises over time, the payback period becomes shorter and, overall, the pro-posed reduction initiatives will result in a higher rate of return.

The table that follows provides a simple summary of capital investment, savings and simple payback.

SectorFive Year Capital

Investment(2010-2018)1

Annual Savings(2008 $)2

Simple Payback (2008 $)

Annual Emissions Reductions (2018)

Buildings $1,350,000 $160,000 8.4 469

Outdoor Lighting3 $250,000 $11,000 22.7 1

Water and Wastewater $150,000 17,500 8.6 5

Vehicle Fleet $80,000 N/A4 - 72

Corporate Solid Waste5 $15,000 N/A - 16

Total $1.85 Million $188,500 9.8 years 563 t

1 Projects to be approved as part of the regular budget cycle2 Savings are valued in 2008 dollars and are therefore conservative 3 Lighting measures include LED technology for streetlights, but a coarse estimate for capital costs is provided 4 Minor savings are anticipated as electric plug-in vehicles are implemented over time, although, there are very few vehicles that are appro-

priate for replacement with an electric vehicle, and those savings will be overshadowed by increasing fuel costs. Capital costs for vehicle replacements are not included. Currently, biodiesel fuel is more expensive than diesel fuel

5 Includes $10,000 for a solid waste audit

Implementing the following recommendations will enable the SCRD to reduce GHG emissions by 27 percent and achieve $188,500 in annual savings in energy costs.

Recommendations

1 Buildings and Miscellaneous Facilities

Explore, refine and incorporate energy and emissions reductions measures into existing capital projects, as de-•scribed in the table that follows and within section 3

The Sechelt Aquatic Centre is the highest priority for implementing the proposed reduction measures. with an •estimated 408 tonnes CO

2e in possible reductions. However, because this facility is new, energy projections (and

therefore energy consumption reductions) are estimates and actual implementation of the reduction initiatives at this facility cannot occur until all construction deficiencies, if any, are addressed and energy consumption patterns are firmly established.

xiii

Rank Account Account Address Capital Cost to Implement

Energy Costs Reduced

Simple Payback (years)

CO2e (tonnes) Reduced

1 Sechelt Aquatic Centre 55 0 0 S h o r n c l i f f e Avenue $559,600 $97,868 5.7 408

2 Gibsons and Area Aquatic Centre 951 Gibsons Way $79,775 $14,845 5.4 32

3 Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fit-ness Centre

13639 Sunshine Coast Hwy $363,627 $19,961 18.2 7

4 Administration Building 1975 Field Road $305,827 $17,078 12.8 6

5 Sunshine Coast Arena 5986 Shoal Ave $9,100 $2,474 3.7 6

6 Transit Building and Works Yard 5920 Mason Road $15,000 $1,864 8.0 5

7 Miscellaneous Buildings# various N/A $3,000 N/A 4

8 Gibsons and Area Community Centre# 700 Park Road N/A $1,106 N/A 1

TOTALS $1,332,929 $158,196 8.4 469

1 Eric Cardinal Hall; Granthams Landing Community Hall; Coopers Green Hall; Chaster House; Gibsons Fire Hall; Halfmoon bay VFD; Roberts Creek Fire Hall; Frank West Fire Hall and Community Hall; and, Edgmont and District Fire Hall

2 This is a new building and has been constructed to be as energy efficient as possible. Walkthrough audits did not reveal additional reduc-tion initiatives beyond a no cost ‘turn it off’ initiative in common areas and office space.

2 Outdoor Lighting

Incorporate dimmers and timers on overhead streetlights to reduce energy costs and associated emissions and •continue to keep apprised of costs associated with LED technologies to replace high pressure sodium and metal halide overhead street lights

3 Water and Wastewater

Ensure that the addition to the Chapman Creek Water Treatment Plant is as energy efficient as possible•

Increase the capital budget accordingly to accelerate the replacement of aging motors to take advantage of the •15 to 25 percent gain in efficiency of new motors

4 Vehicle Fleet

Propose a Board resolution to purchase fuel-efficient vehicles as a priority over price point •

Centralize the fleet to provide a consistent approach to vehicle purchases and allow the fleet manager to implement •policy that incorporates fuel efficiency into the purchasing and ongoing maintenance of vehicles. This initiative is to ensure that the fleet manager can integrate fuel efficiency with regular fleet maintenance

Increase the capital budget for the vehicle fleet to continuously improve the fuel efficiency of vehicles on their •re-placement schedules and to introduce new technologies to reduce fuel consumption

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

xiv

Undertake a number of programs to educate staff on methods to increase fuel efficiency. These programs include •energy aware driver training and promoting employee awareness ways to increase fuel efficiency while driving/operating vehicles

5 Recycling and Corporate Solid Waste

Increase the number of recycling receptacles and initiate a comprehensive recycling program at SCRD facilities so •that staff can recycle the same wastes that are recycled through the existing curbside recycling program

Implement an organics composting program at the Administration Building •

Initiate a solid waste audit at corporate facilities •

6 Community Energy Planning

Although not discussed in the body of the report, the SCRD should develop a region-wide community energy and •emissions plan and explore energy efficient construction standards for new and existing community buildings

Provincial Carbon Neutral Voluntary Commitment:If the Sunshine Coast Regional District Board endorsed the purchase of carbon credits to offset its corporate GHG emissions, this would require an Investment of $27,090 to reduce the carbon footprint to zero based on the 2008 emissions quantity of 1,806 tonnes CO

2e.

In 2018, if the reduction initiatives described in this report were successfully implemented, and the 2018 greenhouse gas emissions forecasts remain intact, it would cost the Sunshine Coast Regional District $19,680 to become carbon neutral.

xv


SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

xvi

Plan Development Process:

Acquire energy consump-1. tion data and direct GHG emissions dataIdentify accounts2. Develop draft energy and 3. GHG emissions inventoryConduct interviews and 4. walkthrough audits of buildings and engineering assetsDevelop the GHG emis-5. sions forecastDevelop the GHG emis-6. sions reduction initiativesDevelop the capital costs 7. for implementationDevelop the overall GHG 8. emissions reduction quan-tity

Introduction

The Sunshine Coast Regional District (SCRD) has demonstrated a commit-ment to addressing issues of climate change including policies and pro-grams relating to sustainable community development, energy efficiency and conservation, as well as greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions. Establishing a current inventory of energy consumption and GHG emis-sions and developing reduction initiatives and an implementation strategy will support ongoing energy conservation and GHG emissions reductions management into the future.

In December 2007, the SCRD endorsed participation in the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Partners for Climate Protection (PCP). Although this report complies with PCP inventory requirements, newly emerging international protocols are being introduced in the near future and the SCRD will need to update the inventory accordingly.

The SCRD has also chosen to sign the BC Climate Action Charter, which in part, is a voluntary commitment to work towards carbon neutral opera-tions by 2012. A Corporate Climate Change Plan with detailed reduction targets and reduction measures is the next step in order to fulfil ongoing voluntary requirements of both programs.

1.0 Plan Development ProcessThe development of this plan is follows a logical progression of steps that results in a strategy that is easy to follow and easy to repeat by SCRD staff in the future (see inset).

Hyla Environmental Services Ltd. (HES) was hired to develop an energy and emissions management plan. Staff from the Regional District assisted in the identification of energy consumption accounts and gathered all other energy consumption and direct emissions data. Forecasts of GHG emissions were estimated through discussions with staff and reduction initiatives were assigned to corporate assets after walkthorugh audits of buildings and engineering assets were undertaken. See section 1.9 for more details on the inventory development process.

1.1 Corporate ProgramsLocal government in B.C. have many reasons to develop corporate energy and emissions plans that extend beyond fiscal responsibility. Even in chal-lenging economic times, the social responsibilities of remaining sensitive to the impacts greenhouse gas emissions have on our changing climate is still front and centre.

There are two programs that are relevant to local government in B.C.: the Partners for Climate Protection Program; and, the Provincial Climate Action Charter.

1

Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Partners for Climate Protection Milestones

Milestone One:

Complete GHG and energy use inventories and forecasts for both operations and the community as a whole (depending upon which plan(s) is being developed).

Milestone Two:

Set Reduction Targets. PCP tar-gets vary for each local govern-ment, but must be presented in a 10 year project period.

Milestone Three:

Develop a Management Plan. Develop a plan that sets out how emissions and energy use in local government operations and the community will be reduced.

Milestone Four:

Implement the Plan. Create strong collaborations between departments and maximize benefits from greenhouse gas reductions.

Milestone Five:

Monitor and Report Progress. Maintain support by monitoring, verifying, and reporting green-house gas reductions.

Partners for Climate Protection

The Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) is an umbrella initiative that fosters municipal participation in greenhouse gas emission reduction initiatives and overall sustainability. Its goal is to assist municipalities with their greenhouse gas management initiatives by providing tools and logistical support. The PCP initiative not only focuses on reducing existing greenhouse gas emissions, but also encourages municipalities to influence future greenhouse gas emissions at a community scale through a variety of mechanisms such as land use and transportation planning, building codes, and permitting. By participating in the PCP initiative, municipalities receive up-to-date information on global cli-mate change and important information regarding strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, including innovative financing strategies and sample action plans. Participating municipalities also make a commit-ment to complete five milestones (see inset).

Climate Action Charter

The Climate Action Charter is a provincial initiative signed by the Prov-ince, the Union of BC Municipalities (UBCM) and local government in which signatories commit to a goal of becoming carbon neutral in cor-porate operations by 2012. Local governments pledge to measure and report their community’s greenhouse gas emissions profile and work to create compact, more energy efficient communities. The Climate Action Charter recognizes the need to take action on climate change and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the important role that the Provincial Government and Local Governments can play in affecting change.

1.2 Corporate ProtocolsBeyond programs that local government can use as a framework to de-velop their own climate action strategies, protocols to calculate green-house gas (GHG) emissions must be adhered to so the inventories and the resulting action strategy is credible.

Emerging ICLEI Protocol

The Partners for Climate Protection is Canada’s implementation of ICLEI–Local Governments for Sustainability’s Cities for Climate Protec-tion (CCP). Although the FCM released a protocol for PCP inventories in the spring of 20081, new protocols for local government corporate and community inventories are emerging from ICLEI USA. These emerging protocols are more comprehensive than the existing PCP protocol since the later has historically focused on GHG emissions that were policy relevant to local government. For example, corporate inventories have focused on buildings and engineering assets owned and operated by local governments. Other emissions sources that have not been tracked in the past include presumably insignificant sources such as emissions from sanitary sewer collection pipes and fugitive emissions from refrig-eration systems.

1 FCM (2008), Developing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Con-sumption Inventories: A Standards and Guidance Document for Canadian Municipalities. Federation of Canadian Municipalities: Ottawa. 59pp.

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

2

New protocols will also add lower priority GHG emission sources such as emissions from employee travel on business, employee commute, contracted services such as solid waste collection and road building, and upstream and down-stream emissions from the purchase of supplies and materials. Although it will not be mandatory to report these emissions, local government will be encouraged to begin to establish internal tracking systems to be able to develop comprehensive, data rich GHG emissions inventories.

1.3 The Challenge of Climate Change and Clean Air PlanningThe SCRD has taken a multi-faceted approach to creating a lower-carbon economy, including energy efficient build-ing design. As the Regional District moves into the next phase of its corporate climate change plan, it faces new challenges, namely more aggressive GHG emissions reduction targets and rising energy costs. An important part of managing these new challenges is the ability to measure and evaluate the impacts of climate change across all sec-tors of its operations through a credible energy and GHG emissions inventory.

Environmental accounting for GHG inventories and ongoing management is becoming a critical component of corporate and community planning worldwide. The GHG inventory provides a starting point, essential in generat-ing relevant reduction measures to help guide the SCRD through the remainder of its GHG emissions management strategy. As well, SCRD staff must identify the economic implications of reducing those emissions.

1.4 Global Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas EmissionsThe global trend toward more aggressive greenhouse gas emission reduction targets will inevitably affect the amount of detail in climate change plans that local government develop. At the beginning of post-Kyoto climate change talks in Bali, Indonesia in 2007, to determine the global climate change regime after 2012, delegates have called for not only stricter GHG reduction targets but also stricter enforcement measures. The tougher stance on emission reductions echoes the G8 summit in Germany in June 2007, where leaders of the G8 nations introduced more aggressive targets for greenhouse gas emission reductions, agreeing to halve current levels by 2050.

The meeting of world leaders followed the release by the United Nations of its toughest critique on climate change in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 4th Assessment Report - Climate Change 2007. Written by over 2500 top scientists, the report concludes that there is “unequivocal” evidence that climate change is real and happening faster than expected. Notably, it calls on nations to increase their efforts in the areas of climate change adaptation, mitigation and technology.

At the federal level, the Canadian government has committed to taking ‘real action’ in its most recent climate change plan, setting GHG emission reductions at 20 percent by 2012 while imposing mandatory reduction targets on indus-try. To support efforts to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, the Canada EcoTrust for Clean Air and Climate Change was introduced in February 2007 to co-fund with the provinces technology development, energy efficiency, and related projects.

British Columbia has received $199.2 million of the $1.5 billion in initial funding from the EcoTrust fund to put to-wards its provincial GHG reduction initiatives, which are some of the toughest in North America. Notably, BC is the first Canadian province to adopt California’s tough motor vehicle emissions reduction targets—30 percent by 2016. Together with thirty-nine U.S. states, nine Canadian provinces, six Mexican states, three native sovereign nations, and the District of Columbia, the province has become a founding member of the North American Climate Registry, a greenhouse gas emissions reporting system.

The province of British Columbia continues to take a national leadership role on climate change with the introduction of the British Columbia Climate Action Charter. Municipal signatories to the charter have agreed to achieve carbon neutral operations by 2012, measure and report GHG emissions and develop energy efficient building, transit, and energy projects (see section 1.1).

The stepped up actions on emission reductions at the global and regional levels have direct implications for local governments whose emission reduction initiatives are a key part of the global climate change solution. The Govern-ment of Canada can play an important role by providing strong leadership to ensure that any federal plan speaks to actions that can be implemented at the local level. These actions will be further supported by direct funding for the development of GHG reduction projects, conservation efforts and educational programs.

3

Since the signing of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992, countries have worked toward meeting the GHG emission reduction targets set at the first Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Under the Kyoto Protocol--the agreement that sets out the targets and options available to countries to achieve them--Canada’s target is to reduce its GHG emissions to six percent below 1990 levels in the period 2008 to 2012.

1.5 Local Benefits of Reducing GHG EmissionsAlthough the co-benefits of reducing energy use and greenhouse gases are varied and dependent upon the man-ner in which energy is consumed, a managed approach to implementation of reduction measures will have positive effects on air pollution, job creation, and energy expenditures.

For local government, reducing operating costs, improving public transit and traffic mobility, enhancing open spaces, improving livability and promoting local economic development are additional co-benefits when implementing greenhouse gas emission action plans. Many of the strategies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions affect other cost and livability factors throughout the community at large. For example, less money spent on electricity and fuel costs translates into more disposable income available to the local economy and potentially lower tax increases.

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions has the additional benefit of reducing particulate matter, nitrous oxides, sulphur oxides and volatile organic compounds–all common air contaminants that contribute to the degradation of air qual-ity.

1.6 Regional and Local ContextStretching from Port Mellon to Earls Cove, the Sunshine Coast Regional District (SCRD) provides regional government services to nearly 28,000 residents. There are five electoral areas in the Regional District, and three municipalities as follows: Area A - Egmont/Pender Harbour; Area B - Halfmoon Bay; Area D - Roberts Creek; Area E - Eliphinstone; Area F - West Howe Sound; District of Sechelt; Sechelt Indian Government District; and, Town of Gibsons.

1.7 Inventory and Plan Preparation Process and MethodsBy joining the PCP initiative, municipalities make a voluntary commitment to complete 5 milestones (see inset page 2). In order to implement an effective strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions it is necessary to develop an in-ventory of the emissions. In its absence, local government lack a starting point from which progress can be measured. Further, they will not be able to forecast future emissions and predict the benefits of proposed reduction measures.

The emissions inventory provides an analysis for all activities and operations that consume energy. This report pertains to the corporate emissions and related reduction initiatives only. The base year emissions quantity is 2008 and the project period is from 2010 to 2017 with the energy and emissions forecast extending to 2018. A review of emissions by sector allows an analysis of the activity or operation responsible for various emissions. Corporate emis-sions by sector include those resulting from buildings, fleet vehicles and other motorized equipment, street lighting, potable water, storm and sanitary sewers, and solid waste generated at facilities.

A review of emissions by source allows an analysis of the origin of various emissions. The origin of the emission is attributed to the type of fuel burned while carrying out the activity or operation. Major sources of greenhouse gas emissions include electricity, natural gas, propane, diesel fuel, and gasoline. Greenhouse gases are emitted as these fuels are burned. Methane from the decomposition of waste in landfills is also a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, but is a direct emission, as apposed to the emissions from burning fossil fuels.

From the energy consumed by various local government operations, the mass of greenhouse gas emissions are cal-culated. This information forms the data from which the overall program goal is derived, and upon which evaluation of progress can be measured in the future. Local government staff assisted with the collection of energy consump-tion data.

The SCRD’s electricity provider, BC Hydro, provided consumption data for accounts owned by the SCRD. Terasen Inc. provided consumption data and costs for consumption of natural gas for the inventory year of 2008. Vehicle fleet data was compiled from internal records while solid waste generated from operations was derived from the volume of bins at corporate facilities and the frequency of pick-up of the bins.

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

4

Figure 1.6 – Local Context for the Sunshine Coast Regional District, British Columbia

5

Data was imported into the Energy and Emissions module of Hyla Environmental Services Ltd.’s Energy & Emissions Monitoring and Reporting System™. The emissions calculator within this software conforms to the methods de-scribed in the International Panel on Climate Change Greenhouse Gas Inventory Reference Manual2, the principles provided in the International Standards Organization (ISO) Draft International Standard for Greenhouse Gases3, and the general guidance within the FCM’s guidance document for the preparation of PCP inventories. Emissions coef-ficients are found in the IPCC document for liquid and gaseous fuels.

The emissions factor for BC Hydro-supplied electricity for the year 2007 has been used to calculate GHG emissions (0.022 kg CO

2e/kWh) because the emissions factor for 2008 is not yet available from BC Hydro.

Energy and emissions are calculated at the account level (e.g., an asset that consumes energy, such as a building or pumping facility, represents an account in the software). A detailed summary of the energy and emissions inventory is provided in Appendix I. The emissions forecast is accomplished using estimates of growth in each sector that will be provided by staff and discussed amongst the project team. Energy costs were estimated by price projections from Nesbitt Burns (http://www.bmonesbittburns.com/default.asp) and the US Energy Agency’s Fuel Economy website (http://www.fueleconomy.gov/).

Forecasting Energy Consumption and Emissions Overview

In order for this report to be recognized by the PCP Secretariat as fulfilling Milestone One of the PCP program, a forecast must be developed 10 years subsequent to the base year inventory. Accordingly, a forecast was estimated based on anticipated changes to individual accounts or new accounts that will be added during the ten year forecast period. The forecast was derived from HES’ interviews with staff. The emissions forecast is presented in the sections for each sector.

Forecasts and Their Contribution to Reduction Targets

The forecasts of energy consumption, costs, and GHG emissions is the projected growth in these parameters from the base year through to the forecast period. Forecasts allow us to understand future energy consumption, costs of con-sumption, and emissions. As stated earlier, the forecast is an essential component of the calculation of the reduction targets. However, forecasts should be considered a work in progress as new information can change the forecast and therefore the reduction targets. Since all the parameters used to calculate the reduction targets are subject to change, targets are essentially ‘moving’ as new information is gathered.

The reduction target is equal to the percent difference between the base year inventory and the forecast year inven-tory. Since reduction targets are absolute and not based on per capita emissions, to achieve an actual reduction, the total reductions achieved during the project period must be greater than the growth in emissions.

Regardless of any overall increase in emissions during the project period, implementing reduction initiatives will, at a minimum, decrease the amount of growth in emissions if the business as usual scenario is allowed to continue. The reduction initiatives that the Regional District selected are summarized in the sections for each sector.

The Reduction Quantity and Reduction Measures

To calculate the overall reduction quantity contained in this report, reduction initiatives have been selected that reduce energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from the existing infrastructure (i.e., base year energy and emissions).

Although reduction amounts are considered estimates, careful consideration has been given to the effect each reduction initiative will have on energy consumption. For each sector, the GHG reductions estimated for each reduc-tion initiative have been calculated based on HES’ estimates of the reductions that may result from implementation of various measures in the buildings, lighting, water and wastewater, and vehicle fleet sectors.

Estimates of reduction quantities are provided for energy consumption, cost for consumption, and GHG emissions. Each reduction initiative for each building and/or engineering asset is listed in the Technical Compendium of Poten-tial Reduction Initiatives and summarized herein.

2 IPCC (2006), IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National. Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K. (eds). Published: IGES, Japan. 3 ISO (2006), Draft International Standard ISO/TC 207 WG5 N162. Greenhouse Gases - Part 1: Specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals. 28pp.

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

6

A Technical Compendium of Potential Reduction Initiatives has been provided to staff that lists all the reduction initia-tives that have been applied to each account in the energy inventory. Reduction measures are not appropriate for some very small accounts (e.g., pumps that consume <5,000 kWh/year). For other accounts, there are no reduction initiatives that are possible (e.g., flat rate accounts for irrigation systems with existing rain sensors and timers). Within this document, accounts are grouped in the same manner in which they appear in the detailed energy and emissions inventory presented in Appendix I. Estimates of energy, costs for energy, and greenhouse gas emission reductions are provided for each reduction initiative for each account. Further, capital costs, simple payback, and costs per kilotonne reduced is also provided in the compendium. Staff must refer to the compendium to review the specific reduction initiatives that have been applied to individual accounts.

Report Organization

1 Introduction

2 Corporate Inventory

3 Buildings

4 Outdoor Lighting


6 Vehicle Fleet

7 Corporate Solid Waste

8 Summary

1.8 Report OrganizationThe remainder of the report is organized into seven sections. Section two presents the energy, costs, and GHG emissions inventory, while sections three to seven presents the buildings, lighting, water and wastewater, vehicle fleet, and solid waste sectors, and their respective forecasts and a summary of proposed reduction initiatives. Section eight provides the summary of emissions and the reduction target.

Appendix I presents the GHG Energy and Emissions Inventory for 2008, Appendix II presents the Energy and Emissions Inventory for Transit Buses (not included in the main inventory), and Appendix III presents the Energy and Emissions Inventory by Department.

7


SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

8

PROTOCOL FOLLOWED

The greenhouse gas emissions inventory con-tained in this report is based on current Federation of Canadian Municipalities’ Partners for Climate Protection protocols. Emerging guidance from the Province of BC may be more comprehensive and contain inventory information that has not been included in PCP inventories in the past.

2 Corporate Inventory

2.1 Corporate Inventory SummaryFigure 2.1 provides an overview of the SCRD’s corporate GHG emissions. GHG emissions from buildings out-weigh emissions from other sectors due to the number of recreational facilities owned and operated by the SCRD.

As is shown in table 2.1, the SCRD consumed 52,230 GJ of energy at a total cost of $988,569 in the 2008 inventory year, resulting in total GHG emissions of 1,806 tonnes CO

2e.

See Appendix 1 for a complete summary inventory for 2008.

Figure 2.1 – GHG Emissions (CO2e tonnes) by Sector (2008)

Build

ings

Ligh

ting

Solid

Was

te

Vehi

cle

Flee

t

Wat

er &

Was

tewat

er

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

tonnes

CO

2e

2008

Table 2.1 – Energy, Costs, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Sector (2008)

Total Emissions(CO2e tonnes)

TotalEnergy (GJ)

TotalCost

PercentEnergy

PercentCosts

SectorPercent

Emissions

36,951 $581,568 1,123Buildings 71% 59% 62%

1,090 $46,515 7Lighting 2% 5% 0%

8,051 $162,754 81Water & Wastewater 15% 16% 4%

6,137 $197,731 440Vehicle Fleet 12% 20% 24%

155Solid Waste 0% 0% 9%

100% 100% 100%Total 52,230 $988,569 1,806

The composition of energy use and GHG emissions in the 2008 inventory is typical of a regional district with several major recreational facilities. Buildings are the largest energy user and greatest source of GHG emissions, responsible for 62% of overall emissions in the 2008 inventory.

The percent of outdoor lighting is low relative to most local governments, but is typical of a regional district. The majority of the region’s street lighting is within the urban areas of Gibsons and Sechelt, and is therefore not owned by the SCRD and not part of the SCRD’s emission inventory.

Although the SCRD operates numerous water and wastewater facilities and pump stations, the only significant facility is the water treatment plant, which is new and incorporates energy-efficient construction.

9

2.2 Inventory by SectorConsumption by Sector

The buildings sector consumed the most energy at 36,951 GJ (71 percent), followed by the water and wastewater sector at 8,051 GJ (15 percent). The vehicle fleet consumed 6,137 GJ (12 percent), while outdoor lighting accounted for 1,090 GJ (two percent).

Illustrations of energy consumption, costs and greenhouse gas emissions by sector allow for a quick visualization of which sec-tors consume the majority of energy, incur the most costs for energy, and whose operations result in the majority of greenhouse gas emissions.

Although these types of illustrations direct attention to the larger pieces of the pie, reduction initiatives are not always practically applied relative to these proportions. Sections three through seven outline prac-tical reduction initiatives that are possible in each sector.

Figure 2.2.1 – Consumption by Sector

36,951 GJ(70.7%)

1,090 GJ(2.1%)

6,137 GJ(11.8%)

8,051 GJ(15.4%)

Buildings

Lighting

Vehicle Fleet

Water & Wastewater

Costs by Sector

The buildings sector had the highest energy costs at $581,568 (59 percent), followed by the vehicle fleet at $197,731 (20 percent). Energy costs for water and wastewater and outdoor lighting were $162,754 (16 percent) and $46,515 respectively (five percent). See figure 2.2.2

Figure 2.2.2 – Costs by Sector

$581,568 (58.8%)

$46,515 (4.7%)

$197,731 (20.0%)

$162,754 (16.5%)

Buildings

Lighting

Vehicle Fleet

Water & Wastewater

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

10

Emissions by Sector

Together, the buildings sector and the fleet sector were responsible for approximately 86 percent of all emissions at 1,123 tonnes CO

2e and 440

tonnes CO2e respectively. Solid waste, water and wastewater, and outdoor

lighting followed with 155 tonnes CO2e, 81 tonnes CO

2e and 7 tonnes

CO2e respectively.

Figure 2.2.3 – GHG Emissions by Sector

1,123 t(62.2%)

7 t(0.4%)

440 t(24.4%)

81 t(4.5%)

155 t(8.6%)

Buildings

Lighting

Vehicle Fleet

Water & Wastewater

Solid Waste

2.3 Inventory by Energy TypeAs is shown in table 2.3.1, the SCRD consumes six types of energy: electricity, natural gas, fuel oil, propane, gasoline and diesel fuel (note: propane is listed for buildings as ‘propaen’ and for vehicle fleet as ‘Mbl Propane’).

Table 2.3.1 – Sources of Corporate Energy & Costs (2008)T 2.1 T 2.1.4 T 2.1.5

100%

49%

Total 100%

EnergyType

TotalEnergy (GJ)Total Use Total CostUnits

Percent TotalEnergy by Source

Percent TotalCosts by Source

52,230 $988,569

$496,4767,096,344kWh 25,547

$285,07020,251GJ 20,251

$1,9011,584litres 61

$108,47394,468litres 3,274

$84,97270,511litres 2,727

9,238litres 234 $7,390

5,358litres 136 $4,286

Electricity

NaturalGas

FuelOil

Gasoline

Diesel Fuel

Propane

PropaneMbl

39%

0%

0%

6%

5%

0%

50%

29%

0%

1%

11%

9%

0%

11

Local government have tough decisions to make

about greenhouse gas emissions. The reality is

that most emissions are necessary in order to

carry out the services that are expected by the

community served. Large diesel trucks repre-

sent one such reality.

Figure 2.3.1 – Energy (GJ) by Type

2,727 GJ(5.2%)

25,547 GJ(48.9%)

61 GJ(0.1%)

3,274 GJ(6.3%)

136 GJ(0.3%)

20,251 GJ(38.8%)

234 GJ(0.4%)

Diesel Fuel

Electricity

Fuel Oil

Gasoline

Mobile Propane

Natural Gas

Propane

Figure 2.3.2 – Costs by Type

$84,972 (8.6%)

$496,476 (50.2%)

$1,901 (0.2%)

$108,473 (11.0%)

$4,286 (0.4%)

$285,070 (28.8%)

$7,390 (0.7%)

Diesel Fuel

Electricity

Fuel Oil

Gasoline

Mobile Propane

Natural Gas

Propane

Consumption by Energy Type

In terms of energy content, electricity is responsible for 49 percent of total energy consumed by the SCRD. This is followed by natural gas (39 percent), gasoline (six percent), diesel fuel (five percent), and fuel oil, stationary propane, and mobile propane, all less than one percent.

Costs by Energy Type

Electricity accounts for 50 percent of total energy costs, followed by natural gas (29 percent), gasoline (11 per-cent) and diesel fuel (nine percent). Stationary propane, mobile propane and fuel oil follow at approximately one percent combined.

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

12

Sources of Corporate Emissions

The greatest source of emissions in 2008 was from the combustion of natural gas (57 percent of total emissions), followed by gasoline (13 percent), diesel fuel (11 percent), solid waste (nine percent) and electricity (nine percent). Stationary propane, mobile propane and fuel oil produce less than one percent of the SCRD’s total emissions. Table 2.3.3 and the accompanying illustration show the contribution of each major energy source to total emissions.

Table 2.3.3 – Sources of Corporate Emissions (2008)

9%

Total 100%1,805.7

7,096,344kWh 156.1

20,251GJ 1,035.8

1,584litres 4.5

94,468litres 235.9

70,511litres 196.0

9,238litres 14.2

5,358litres 8.1

Electricity

Natural Gas

Fuel Oil

Gasoline

Diesel Fuel

Propane

PropaneMbl

57%

0%

1%

13%

11%

0%

Solid Waste 155.0 9%

EnergyType

Total UseUnitsTotal Emissions(CO2e tonnes)

Percent bySource

T 2.1 T 2.1.4 T 2.1.5

Figure 2.3.3 – GHG Emissions (tonnes CO2e) by Type

196 t(10.9%)

156 t(8.6%)

4 t(0.2%)

236 t(13.1%)

8 t(0.4%)

1,036 t(57.4%)

14 t(0.8%)

155 t(8.6%)

Diesel Fuel

Electricity

Fuel Oil

Gasoline

Mobile Propane

Natural Gas

Propane

Solid Waste

13

3 Buildings

3.1 Buildings OverviewThe SCRD owns 29 buildings across the district. The total energy consumed in all buildings in 2008 was 36,951 GJ, which is shared by four energy types: electricity (17,106 GJ), natural gas (19,550 GJ), propane (234 GJ) and fuel oil (61 GJ). This resulted in energy costs of $581,568 and total emissions of 1,123 tonnes CO

2e (Table 3.1.1). Table 3.1.2 ranks

the top ten energy consumers in the buildings sector.

In 2008, the SCRD acquired the Gibsons and Area Aquatic Facility and the Sechelt Aquatic Centre, and a new facility, the Gibsons and Area Community Centre, began operations. Each of these facilities represents a significant addition to the SCRD’s emissions inventory. Section 3.2 presents an emissions inventory forecast that includes the energy consumption and emissions from these facilities.

Table 3.1.1 – Summary of Buildings Sector Emissions (2008) T 2.1 T 2.1.4 T 2.1.5

36,951 $581,568 1,123

$299,4664,751,566kWhElectricity 17,106 104.5

$272,81119,550GJNatural Gas 19,550 1,000.0

$1,9011,584litres 61 4.5FuelOil

Propane 9,238litres 234 $7,390 14.2

Buildings

Sector

Totals

Energy Type& Units

Total Energy(GJ)

TotalCO2e (t)

TotalCosts

Total Use Fuel Efficiency

Table 3.1.2 – Buildings Ranked by Energy Consumption (2008)

2008

: Top Energy ConsumersBuildings CO2eCostsEnergy

Sechelt Aquatic Centre - 5500 Shorncliffe Avenue 16,829 GJ $234,590 664.6 t

Gibsons And Area Community Centre - 700 Park Rd Ice 6,008 GJ $96,030 118.8 t

Gibsons And Area Aquatic Facility - 951 Gibsons Way 4,135 GJ $61,840 184.0 t

Sunshine Coast Arena - 5986 Shoal Way 3,093 GJ $53,503 49.0 t

Pender Harbour Aquatic And Fitness Centre - 13639 Sunshine Coast

Highway

1,990 GJ $32,441 12.2 t

Administration Building - 1975 Field Rd 1,719 GJ $31,703 10.5 t

Transit Building And Works Yard - 5920 Mason Rd 1,159 GJ $23,945 31.1 t

Gibsons Fire Hall - 790 North Rd 354 GJ $7,535 10.3 t

Parks Hut - 5920 Mason Rd 222 GJ $4,447 10.3 t

Halfmoon Bay Fire Hall - 8972 Redrooffs Rd 213 GJ $4,823 1.3 t

Eric Cardinal Hall - Shirley Macey Park Chamberlin Rd 192 GJ $3,931 8.0 t

Roberts Creek Fire Hall - 1302 Roberts Creek Rd 176 GJ $3,996 1.1 t

Sechelt Landfill - 4901 Dusty Road 168 GJ $4,643 10.2 t

Katherine Lake Campground - Garden Bay Rd 109 GJ $2,582 0.7 t

Chaster House - 1549 Ocean Beach Esp 85 GJ $2,066 4.7 t

Granthams Landing Community Hall - 846 Church Rd 73 GJ $1,689 0.4 t

Frank West Fire Hall - 1226 Chaster Rd 62 GJ $1,457 0.4 t

Coopers Green Hall - Redrooffs Rd P164l 56 GJ $1,313 0.3 t

Gibsons And Area Community Centre - 700 Park Rd Temp 43 GJ $951 0.3 t

Frank West Hall - 1224 Chaster Rd 40 GJ $945 0.2 t

Halfmoon Bay Fire Hall Satellite Station - 7884 Fawn Rd 36 GJ $699 0.2 t

Egmont And District Fire Hall Temporary Account - 5592 Egmont Rd 35 GJ $857 0.2 t

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2007 Rank

Account Energy Costs CO2e

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

14

Table 3.1.2 presents the top 10 energy consuming buildings accounts of a total of 29 accounts (note: there are two additional accounts-- radio relay towers --included in the building sector that have been grouped in the buildings sector for lack of a more appropriate sector). The remaining buildings accounts can be viewed in Appendix I.

In 2008, the Sechelt Aquatic Centre and the Gibsons and Area Community Centre were the top two energy consum-ers, followed by the Gibsons and Area Aquatic Facility, the Sunshine Coast Arena and the Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fitness Centre. The Administration Building was ranked sixth in energy consumption amongst SCRD buildings.

The Sechelt Aquatic Centre is the top energy consumer in the district due to the natural gas used to heat pool water, while the Gibsons and Area Community Centre is the second-highest energy consumer due to the electricity used for pumps to maintain the ice surface in the arena. The Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fitness Centre is a significant energy consumer because it employs electricity to heat pool water, which is far less efficient than conventional natural gas fired boilers. Space heating is responsible for the majority of the energy consumed in the Administration Building.

Figure 3.1.1 illustrates energy costs by subcategory, where ice arenas and indoor pools account for approximately 83% of all building costs.

Figure 3.1.1 – Costs for Energy in the Building Subsectors (2008)

5.5%

0.0%

1.7%

3.3%

26.0%

56.8%

1.4%

0.0%

5.0%

0.1%0.0%

Administration Offices Cemetery

Community Hall Fire Services

Ice Arenas Indoor Pools

Misc. Parks & Sportsfields

Public Works Bldgs & Yards Radio Transmitter/Repeater/Receiver

Storage Facility

text

3.2 Buildings ForecastThis section describes anticipated changes in the buildings sector that form the basis of the overall energy and emis-sions forecast. We estimated a forecast percent based on expected changes to individual accounts or new accounts that will be added during the ten-year forecast period.

Significant changes have already occurred in the buildings sector with the addition of three facilities: the Sechelt Aquatic Centre, the Gibsons and Area Aquatic Centre and the Gibsons and Area Community Centre. These facilities are either new or were newly acquired by the SCRD in 2007. At present, the SCRD has no plans for significant addi-tions to the buildings sector with the exception of expanding the Administration Building and renovating the Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fitness Centre.

15

Table 3.2.1 provides an overall forecast for energy consumption in the buildings sector. Insignificant volumes of fuel oil, diesel fuel for generators and propane consumed in the buildings sector do not form part of the forecast. A nomi-nal growth in emissions (0.5 percent per year) has been included for energy consumption to account for extended hours of operation in buildings over time.

Table 3.2.1 – Predicted Buildings Growth

Sector Deletions and Additions from 2008 to 2018

BuildingsAdministration Building (70,000 kWh, 150 GJ Nat Gas)

Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fitness Centre (100,000 kWh Electricity)

Nominal increases for electricity and natural gas consumption were added to the forecast for the planned expan-sion of the Administration Building and an increase in electricity was added to the forecast for the renovation of the Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fitness Centre.

Table 3.2.2 – Forecast of Buildings Consumption

Energy Type/Unit Consumption Energy

(GJ)Forecasted

ConsumptionForecasted

Percent Forecasted Energy (GJ)

Forecasted Total Energy

(GJ)2008 2018

Electricity (kWh) 4,751,566 17,106 4,989,144 105 % 17,961 38,489

Nat Gas (GJ) 19,550 19,550 20,527 105 % 20,528

Local governments are paying particular attention to forecasts of energy costs to help them better prepare for future budgets. Although it is difficult to predict future energy costs, these costs will certainly increase during the forecast period. Conservative estimates of energy cost increases are provided. Table 3.2.2 provides a forecast of projected energy consumption to 2018. Table 3.2.3 provides a forecast of projected costs for energy consumption to 2018.

Table 3.2.3 – Forecast of Buildings Costs

Energy Type/Unit Consumption Unit cost Costs Forecasted

ConsumptionForecasted

Unit cost Forecasted

CostsForecasted Total Costs

2008 2018

Electricity (kWh) 4,751,566 $0.061 $299,466 4,989,144 $0.08 $399,132 $707,044

Nat Gas (GJ) 19,550 $12 $272,811 20,528 $15 $307,913

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

16

Table 3.2.4 – Forecast of Buildings GHG Emissions

Energy Type/Unit

Emissions CO2e (t) Total CO2e (t) Forecasted Emissions

CO2e (t)Total Emissions

CO2e (t)

2008 2018

Electricity (kWh) 104

1,119

110

1,175Nat Gas (GJ) 1,000 1,050

other sources 15 15

Based on predicted increases from 2008 to 2018, energy consumption is forecast to increase from 36,656 GJ to 38,489 GJ. Incorporating the cost per unit of energy into the forecast, energy costs are expected to increase from $572,277 to $707,044 and GHG emissions are forecast to increase from 1,120 tonnes CO

2e to 1,175 tonnes CO

2e, an increase of 5

percent.

3.3 Reduction InitiativesThere are many ways for the SCRD to reduce energy consumption and related GHG emissions in regional district-owned buildings. Beyond the specific reduction initiatives proposed for the buildings evaluated, awareness programs such as ‘turn it off’ should also be implemented.

The following subsections summarize the potential energy reduction initiatives for the highest energy-consuming buildings in the SCRD. See the Technical Compendium of Reduction Initiatives for a detailed listing of reduction initia-tives.

Initiatives Completed and/or Underway

Rooftop units in most buildings have been upgraded and/or replaced over time, although it is difficult to track the resulting energy reductions. Most buildings have had T12 fluorescent fixtures replaced with T8 fixtures and most magnetic ballasts have been upgraded to electronic ballasts. As expected, smaller, older buildings have not been retrofitted.

Proposed Reduction Initiatives

Table 3.3.1 shows the estimated reductions in energy use, energy costs and GHG emissions for the proposed reduc-tion initiatives (as approved by the Board on an annual basis).

Table 3.3.1 – Proposed Reduction Initiatives in the Buildings SectorReduction Measures Affecting Base Year Energy/Emissions

BuildingsConsumption CO2e (t)

Annual Savings

Costs Three Years Seven Years

Simple Payback Period

Five Years

10,746 GJ 468 t$158,416TOTAL THIS SECTOR:

SUBTOTALS 511,503 kWh8,868 GJ

$37,830 11 t$119,628 454 t

956 L $958 3 tFuel OilNatural GasElectricity $113,491

$358,884$2,875

$189,151$598,139$4,791

$264,812$837,395$6,707

17

It is estimated that approximately 11,000 GJ of energy can be saved by implementing building retrofits, resulting in energy savings of approximately $158,000. These initiatives would also reduce emissions by approximately 469 tonnes CO

2e (Note: due to rounding errors, table 3.3.1 reflects a total annual CO

2e savings of 468 t, whereas we report 469

tonnes throughout the remainder of the report).

Technology

Technology will play an important role in the actual reductions achieved during the project period. The rate of intro-duction of new technologies that increase energy efficiency -- and the availability of alternative energy sources and new technologies for energy production -- are key to achieving significant reductions in the future.

Generally, reduction initiatives do not include technologies that are not commercially viable today or that are not cur-rently cost effective.

The remainder of this section describes the results of the walk-through building audits. Each subsection summarizes the estimates of the annual energy consumption, energy costs and CO

2e savings that would result from implement-

ing the reduction measures. Capital costs and simple payback are also provided. This information is also summarized in table 3.5 and ranked by the quantity of CO

2e reduced. See the Technical Compendium of Reduction Initiatives for a

detailed listing of reduction initiatives.

Administration Building

The Administration Building only consumes electricity but would benefit from ground-source heat pumps to reduce inefficient rooftop units that are currently being used to heat and cool the building. Since an expansion of the Admin-istration Building is proposed, ground-source heat pumps should be evaluated as part of the design. A heat recovery ventilator is proposed and there is a small opportunity to reclaim heat from the server room. Solar power for domestic hot water and heating is possible and should also be explored as part of the expansion design. The estimated cost to implement reduction initiatives is ~$306,000 with a simple payback period of 13 years (see table 3.5).

Reduction Measures Affecting Base Year

Buildings 2008 - All

Administration Offices

Administration Building -1975 Field Rd

249,106 kWh $17,078 5.5

Consumption CO2e (t)

Reductions

Costs Simple Payback

(yrs)Capital Cost Ph

Affect on 2ndary Energy

Type

Cost per Kt

reduced749,663 $45,149kwh

2008 Electricity Consumption and Estimates of Reductions

16

Consumption CO2e (t)Costs

2008 Inventory

‘TURN IT OFF ‘PROGRAM1. 47,758 $3,274 1.1kWh $0 $0.0 Yes

CHANGE HEAT PUMP REFRIGERANT2. 0 $0 0.0kWh $0 $0.0 Yes

GEOEXCHANGE SYSTEM3. -76,413 $-5,239 -1.7kWh $0 $0.0 Yes

AUTO COMPUTER SHUTDOWN4. 3,152 $216 0.1kWh 1.2$250 $3.6 Yes

SOLAR HEATING - HOT WATER5. 23,879 $1,637 0.5kWh 2.1$3,500 $6.7 Yes

HEAT RECOVERY VENTILATOR6. 83,577 $5,730 1.8kWh 3.8$21,801 $11.9 Yes

GEOEXCHANGE SYSTEM7. 167,153 $11,459 3.7kWh 24.5$280,276 $76.2 Yes

ELECTRICITY SUBTOTAL 249,106 kWh $17,078 5.5 t

897 GJ 5.5 t$17,078

17.9$305,827

249,106 kWh $17,078 5.5 tElectricity

897 GJ 5.5 t$17,078

ACCOUNT SUBTOTAL 17.9$305,827


897 GJ 5 t$17,078

SUBCATEGORY TOTAL

1All

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

18

Sechelt Aquatic Centre

Implementing the proposed reduction measures at the Sechelt Aquatic Centre is the highest priority, as these initia-tives will result an estimated reduction of 408 tonnes CO

2e. Because this facility is new, energy projections (and there-

fore energy consumption reductions) are rough estimates. Actual implementation at this facility cannot occur until all construction deficiencies, if any, are addressed and energy consumption patterns are firmly established. Vending misers should be installed through the agreement with the vending machine supplier. The estimated cost to imple-ment reduction initiatives is ~$560,000 with a simple payback period of 5.7 years (see table 3.5).

Indoor Pools

Pender Harbour Aquatic And Fitness Centre -13639 Sunshine Coast Highway

315,100 kWh $19,961 6.9


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt



19


2008 Inventory


GEOEXCHANGE FEASIBILITY48. -92,294 $-5,847 -2.0kWh $0 $0.0 Yes

DISCONNECT PARASITIC49. 5,527 $350 0.1kWh 0.1$25 $0.2 Yes

VENDING MISERS (WT)50. 4,974 $315 0.1kWh 1.9$600 $5.5 Yes


SOLAR HOT WATER52. 14,547 $922 0.3kWh 4.9$4,500 $14.1 Yes

SOLAR HEATING - AIR53. 29,230 $1,852 0.6kWh 5.4$10,000 $15.6 Yes

LED EXIT LAMP RETROFIT KIT54. 1,105 $70 0.0kWh 6.4$447 $18.4 Yes

CONVERT TO LEDS55. 1,072 $68 0.0kWh 6.6$447 $19.0 Yes

REDESIGN HID AND T12 (WT)56. 33,160 $2,101 0.7kWh 16.7$35,000 $48.0 Yes

GEOEXCHANGE FEASIBILITY57. 138,165 $8,753 3.0kWh 33.1$290,000 $95.4 Yes


1,134 GJ 6.9 t$19,961

18.2$363,652


1,134 GJ 6.9 t$19,961


Sechelt Aquatic Centre -5500 Shorncliffe Avenue

8,057 GJ $107,753 412.2


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt

reduced12,473 $166,800GJ

2008 Natural Gas Consumption and Estimates of Reductions

638


2008 Inventory

SOLAR HOT WATER58. 200 $2,669 10.2GJ 3.4$9,000 $0.9 Yes

SOLAR HEATING - AIR59. 998 $13,344 51.0GJ 3.7$50,000 $1.0 Yes

HEAT RECLAMATION60. 6,860 $91,740 351.0GJ 5.5$500,000 $1.4 Yes

NATURAL GAS SUBTOTAL 8,057 GJ $107,753 412.2 t

8,057 GJ 412.2 t$107,753

5.2$559,000

8All

-175,839 kWh $-9,885 -3.9


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt

reduced1,992,461 $98,409kwh


44


2008 Inventory


HEAT RECLAMATION62. -302,545 $-17,007 -6.7kWh $0 $0.0 Yes


ELECTRICITY SUBTOTAL -175,839 kWh $-9,885 -3.9 t

-633 GJ -3.9 t-$9,885

-0.1$600

-175,839 kWh $-9,885 -3.9 tElectricity

8,057 GJ $107,753 412.2 tNatural Gas

7,424 GJ 408.4 t$97,868


Gibsons And Area Aquatic Facility -951 Gibsons Way

581 GJ $7,924 29.7


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt

reduced6,039 $77,512GJ


309


2008 Inventory

SOLAR HOT WATER64. 53 $720 2.7GJ 6.2$4,500 $1.7 Yes


NATURAL GAS SUBTOTAL 581 GJ $7,924 29.7 t

581 GJ 29.7 t$7,924

6.9$54,500

85,012 kWh $6,921 1.9


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt



6


2008 Inventory



VENDING MISERS (WT)68. 170 $14 0.0kWh 43.4$600 $160.7 Yes


306 GJ 1.9 t$6,921

3.7$25,275


581 GJ $7,924 29.7 tNatural Gas

887 GJ 31.6 t$14,845



8,639 GJ $115,677 442.0 tNatural Gas

9,446 GJ 447 t$132,675

SUBCATEGORY TOTAL

9All

19

Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fitness Centre

The Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fitness Centre will undergo a major renovation that will incorporate lighting ef-ficiency upgrades. This facility is relatively inefficient as it uses electricity rather than natural gas to heat pool water. Proposed measures include ground-source heat pumps, although the efficiency of this system would need further evaluation. Electrical energy consumption can also be reduced by implementing a ‘turn it off’ program, retrofitting overhead lighting, eliminating parasitic electrical losses and replacing all existing incandescent lights in office spaces, washrooms and storage areas with compact fluorescent luminaires. The estimated cost to implement reduction initia-tives is $364,000 with a simple payback period of 18 years (see table 3.5).

Indoor Pools

Pender Harbour Aquatic And Fitness Centre -13639 Sunshine Coast Highway

315,100 kWh $19,961 6.9


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt



19


2008 Inventory


GEOEXCHANGE FEASIBILITY48. -92,294 $-5,847 -2.0kWh $0 $0.0 Yes

DISCONNECT PARASITIC49. 5,527 $350 0.1kWh 0.1$25 $0.2 Yes



SOLAR HOT WATER52. 14,547 $922 0.3kWh 4.9$4,500 $14.1 Yes

SOLAR HEATING - AIR53. 29,230 $1,852 0.6kWh 5.4$10,000 $15.6 Yes

LED EXIT LAMP RETROFIT KIT54. 1,105 $70 0.0kWh 6.4$447 $18.4 Yes

CONVERT TO LEDS55. 1,072 $68 0.0kWh 6.6$447 $19.0 Yes

REDESIGN HID AND T12 (WT)56. 33,160 $2,101 0.7kWh 16.7$35,000 $48.0 Yes

GEOEXCHANGE FEASIBILITY57. 138,165 $8,753 3.0kWh 33.1$290,000 $95.4 Yes


1,134 GJ 6.9 t$19,961

18.2$363,652


1,134 GJ 6.9 t$19,961


Sechelt Aquatic Centre -5500 Shorncliffe Avenue

8,057 GJ $107,753 412.2


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt

reduced12,473 $166,800GJ


638


2008 Inventory

SOLAR HOT WATER58. 200 $2,669 10.2GJ 3.4$9,000 $0.9 Yes


HEAT RECLAMATION60. 6,860 $91,740 351.0GJ 5.5$500,000 $1.4 Yes

NATURAL GAS SUBTOTAL 8,057 GJ $107,753 412.2 t

8,057 GJ 412.2 t$107,753

5.2$559,000

8All

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

20

Gibsons and Area Aquatic Centre

Solar heating for hot water and air would reduce energy consumption at this facility by 581 GJ. A heat recovery ventilator, ‘turn it off’ program, and vending misers could save an additional 306 GJ of energy. The estimated cost to implement reduction initiatives is ~$80,000 with a simple payback period of 5.4 years (see table 3.5).

-175,839 kWh $-9,885 -3.9


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt

reduced1,992,461 $98,409kwh


44


2008 Inventory


HEAT RECLAMATION62. -302,545 $-17,007 -6.7kWh $0 $0.0 Yes


ELECTRICITY SUBTOTAL -175,839 kWh $-9,885 -3.9 t

-633 GJ -3.9 t-$9,885

-0.1$600

-175,839 kWh $-9,885 -3.9 tElectricity

8,057 GJ $107,753 412.2 tNatural Gas

7,424 GJ 408.4 t$97,868


Gibsons And Area Aquatic Facility -951 Gibsons Way

581 GJ $7,924 29.7


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt



309


2008 Inventory

SOLAR HOT WATER64. 53 $720 2.7GJ 6.2$4,500 $1.7 Yes



581 GJ 29.7 t$7,924

6.9$54,500

85,012 kWh $6,921 1.9


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt



6


2008 Inventory



VENDING MISERS (WT)68. 170 $14 0.0kWh 43.4$600 $160.7 Yes


306 GJ 1.9 t$6,921

3.7$25,275



887 GJ 31.6 t$14,845



8,639 GJ $115,677 442.0 tNatural Gas

9,446 GJ 447 t$132,675

SUBCATEGORY TOTAL

9All

21

Sunshine Coast Arena

Reduction initiatives to consider include expanding the existing heat recovery system and heating makeup air with a solar wall. Vending misers should be installed through the agreement with the vending machine supplier. The esti-mated cost to implement reduction initiatives is $9,100 with a simple payback period of 3.7 years (see table 3.5).

Ice Arenas

Sunshine Coast Arena -5986 Shoal Way

107 GJ $1,668 5.5


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt



58


2008 Inventory


EXPAND EXISTING HEAT RECOVERY45. 0 $0 0.0GJ ?$5,000 ? Yes


107 GJ 5.5 t$1,668

5.1$8,500

6,733 kWh $806 0.1


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt

reduced1,014,976 $57,674kwh


22


2008 Inventory


ELECTRICITY SUBTOTAL 6,733 kWh $806 0.1 t

24 GJ 0.1 t$806

0.7$600

6,733 kWh $806 0.1 tElectricity


131 GJ 5.6 t$2,474




131 GJ 6 t$2,474

SUBCATEGORY TOTAL

7All

Gibsons and Area Community Centre

The Gibsons and Area Community Centre is a new building that has been constructed to be as energy efficient as possible. Walkthrough audits did not reveal additional reduction initiatives beyond a no cost ‘turn it off’ program in common areas and office space. Other minor retrofits include replacing incandescent overhead spot lighting in office areas with LED lighting strips. Vending misers should be installed through an agreement with the vending machine supplier. Costs to implement reduction initiatives have not been estimated for this building (see table 3.5).

Ice Arenas

Sunshine Coast Arena -5986 Shoal Way

107 GJ $1,668 5.5


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt



58


2008 Inventory


EXPAND EXISTING HEAT RECOVERY45. 0 $0 0.0GJ ?$5,000 ? Yes


107 GJ 5.5 t$1,668

5.1$8,500

6,733 kWh $806 0.1


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt

reduced1,014,976 $57,674kW

h


22


2008 Inventory


ELECTRICITY SUBTOTAL 6,733 kWh $806 0.1 t

24 GJ 0.1 t$806

0.7$600



131 GJ 5.6 t$2,474


Gibsons And Area Community Centre -700 Park Rd Ice

16,782 kWh $1,106 0.4


Reductions




Type

Cost per Kt

reduced1,162,688 $68,700kW

h


26


2008 Inventory

‘TURN IT OFF ‘PROGRAM47. 13,952 $919 0.3kWh $0 $0.0 Yes

CONVERT OVERHEAD HALOGENS TO LED48. 2,830 $186 0.1kWh 26.8$5,000 $80.3 Yes


60 GJ 0.4 t$1,106

4.5$5,000


60 GJ 0.4 t$1,106




192 GJ 6 t$3,580

SUBCATEGORY TOTAL

7All

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

22

Transit Building and Works Yard

Reduction initiatives are limited at the Transit Building and Works Yard. Options include insulating bay doors, installing door interlocks and repairing leaks and drafts. However, heating is a problem in the main vehicle bay and staff cur-rently exercise care with the doors, particularly in colder weather conditions. Implementing these energy reduction initiatives will save approximately $1,800 in energy costs and lead to a reduction of approximately 5 tonnes CO

2e.

Estimated costs to implement reduction initiatives is $15,000 with a simple payback period of eight years.

Miscellaneous Buildings

As part of the Green Buildings BC project, walkthrough audits were conducted by the Community Energy Association on a number of smaller buildings , including: Eric Cardinal Hall, Granthams Landing Community Hall, Coopers Green Hall, Chaster House, Gibsons Fire Hall, Halfmoon Bay VFD, Roberts Creek Fire Hall, Frank West Fire Hall and Community Hall, and Egmont and District Fire Hall.

The total estimated savings in these buildings is approximately 3 tonnes CO2e and $3,000 dollars in energy costs.

Costs for individual reduction initiatives were not provided since the variability in pricing of local contractors makes cost estimates difficult to estimate and most initiatives can be undertaken by SCRD staff.

3.5 SummaryTable 3.5 ranks reduction measures throughout the SCRD’s building stock based on tonnes of greenhouse gases reduced. Implementation for each building would be considered by the Board on an annual basis.

Values for capital costs are estimated, and values for costs reduced and simple payback are calculated at the 2008 unit cost for energy. As the unit cost for energy increases over time, the simple payback associated with the project de-creases accordingly. The values for CO

2e saved that include electricity are calculated using the 2007 electricity

emissions factor provided by BC Hydro, as emissions factors for 2008 are not currently available.

Table 3.5 – Prioritized Implementation in the Buildings Sector by CO2e Reduced

Rank Account Account Address

Capital Cost to Implement

Energy Costs

Reduced

Simple Payback (years)

CO2e (tonnes) Reduced

1 Sechelt Aquatic Centre 5500 Shorncliffe Avenue $559,600 $97,868 5.7 408

2 Gibsons and Area Aquatic Centre 9 51 G i b s o n s Way $79,775 $14,845 5.4 32

3 Pender Harbour Aquatic and Fitness Centre

13639 Sunshine Coast Hwy $363,627 $19,961 18.2 7

4 Administration Building 1975 Field Road $305,827 $17,078 12.8 6

5 Sunshine Coast Arena 5986 Shoal Ave $9,100 $2,474 3.7 6

6 Transit Building and Works Yard 5 9 2 0 M a s o n Road $15,000 $1,864 8.0 5

7 Miscellaneous Buildings# various N/A $3,000 N/A 4

8 Gibsons a nd A rea Commu nit y Centre# 700 Park Road N/A $1,106 N/A <1

TOTALS $1,332,929 $158,196 8.4 469

1 Eric Cardinal Hall; Granthams Landing Community Hall; Coopers Green Hall; Chaster House; Gibsons Fire Hall; Halfmoon bay VFD; Roberts Creek Fire Hall; Frank West Fire Hall and Community Hall; and, Edgmont and District Fire Hall

23

4 Outdoor Lighting

4.1 Outdoor Lighting OverviewThe SCRD’s outdoor lighting consumed 1,090 GJ of electricity (302,901 kWh), resulting in the production of 7 tonnes of CO

2e at a cost of $46,515 (Table 4.1.1). Outdoor lighting accounted for one percent of corporate emissions (Table

2.1). Table 4.1.2 ranks the significant energy-consuming accounts in the lighting sector and figure 4.1.1 illustrates the break-down of all categories.

Table 4.1.1 – Summary of Outdoor Lighting Sector Emissions (2008) T 2.1 T 2.1.4 T 2.1.5

1,090 $46,515 7

$46,515302,901kWhElectricity 1,090 6.7Lighting

Sector

Totals

Energy Type& Units

Total Energy(GJ)

TotalCO2e (t)

TotalCosts


Table 4.1.2 – Outdoor Lighting Ranked by Energy Consumption (2008)

The highest energy-consuming outdoor lighting account in the SCRD is the parking lot lights at the Sunshine Coast Arena. Although the consumption of these lights is typical, the total energy consumption is insignificant relative to the accounts in other sectors. Table 4.1.2 presents the top 10 energy consuming outdoor lighting accounts of a total of 32 accounts. The remaining outdoor lighting accounts, which can be viewed in Appendix I, are streetlights, playing field lighting and small dock and pole lights.

Figure 4.1.1 illustrates energy costs by subcategory, where overhead streetlights and parking lot lights account for approximately 94 percent of all outdoor lighting costs.

: Top Energy ConsumersLighting CO2eCostsEnergy

Sunshine Coast Arena - 5986 Shoal Way 313 GJ $7,056 1.9 t

Sunshine Coast Arena - Sun Cst Hwy 268 GJ $6,069 1.6 t

Gibsons And Area Aquatic Facility - 951 Gibsons Way Pool 75 GJ $1,741 0.5 t

Langdale Regional Street Lighting - Overhead Street Ltg F 61 GJ $5,199 0.4 t

Sechelt [A] Regional Street Lighting - Overhead Street Ltg A 56 GJ $5,120 0.3 t

Sunshine Coast Regional District Administr Lighting - Overhead Street

Ltg D

51 GJ $4,303 0.3 t

Sechelt [B] Regional Street Lighting - Overhead Street Ltg B 42 GJ $3,617 0.3 t

Pratt Road Regional Street Lighting - Overhead Street Ltg E-Pratt Rd 39 GJ $3,409 0.2 t

Scrd Parks - Garden Bay Rd 32 GJ $804 0.2 t

Cooper’s Green Park - Redrooffs Rd 29 GJ $576 0.2 t

Cliff Gilker Park - Sun Cst Hwy 21 GJ $537 0.1 t

Woodcreek Park Local Service Area Lighting - Overhead St Ltg-Woodcreek 16 GJ $1,468 0.1 t

Granthams Landing Local Service Area Street Lighting - Overhead

Street Ltg

14 GJ $1,503 0.1 t

Langdale Local Service Area Lighting - Overhead Street Ltg 14 GJ $1,503 0.1 t

Keats Road - Keats Camp Wharf Lights On Wharf 11 GJ $309 0.1 t

Sunnyside Local Service Area Lighting - Overhead Street Ltg Sunnyside Rd 6 GJ $601 0.0 t

Keats Road - Keats Rd-8530 Pole 18 6 GJ $243 0.0 t

Hopkins Landing Port - Burns Rd 5 GJ $178 0.0 t

Shirley Macey Park - 944 Chamberlin Rd 5 GJ $170 0.0 t

Halfmoon Bay Port - Mintie Rd 3 GJ $129 0.0 t

Fircrest Road Local Service Area Lighting - Overhead Street Ltg Fircrest Rd 3 GJ $301 0.0 t

Stewart Road Local Service Lighting - Overhead Street Ltg Stewart Rd 3 GJ $301 0.0 t

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2008 Rank


SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

24

Figure 4.1.1 – Costs for Energy in the Outdoor Lighting Subsectors (2008)

1.3%

61.0%

32.3%

1.2%

4.2%

Dock Light Overhead Lighting

Parking Lot Lighting (open) Playing Field Lighting

Pole Light

developer

4.2 Outdoor Lighting ForecastAn overall forecast of one percent growth is projected for the outdoor lighting sector, which forms the basis for the overall energy and emissions forecast. The forecast percent was estimated based on anticipated changes to individual accounts or new accounts that will be added during the ten-year forecast period.

Staff could not identify any anticipated changes in this sector, with the exception of increased overhead lighting for new neighbourhoods. Although the details of those new neighbourhoods are unknown at this time, an increase of 0.1% per year was applied to accommodate annual growth for a total of one percent in ten years. Table 4.2.1 provides a forecast of projected energy consumption to 2018, table 4.2.3 provides a forecast of costs for energy consumption to 2018, and table 4.2.4 provides a forecast of emissions to 2018.

Table 4.2.1 – Forecast of Lighting Consumption

Energy Type/Unit Consumption Energy (GJ)

Forecasted Percent Forecasted Energy (GJ)

2008 2018

Electricity (kWh) 302,901 1,090 1.01 1,091

Table 4.2.2 – Forecast of Lighting Costs

Energy Type/Unit Consumption Unit Cost Costs Forecasted

ConsumptionForecasted Unit Cost

Forecasted Total Costs

2008 2018

Electricity (kWh) 302,901 $0.061 $46,515 331,191 blended rates $51,167

25

Table 4.2.3 – Forecast of Emissions

Energy Type Emissions CO2e (t)

Total CO2e (t)

Forecast Percent

Forecasted Emissions CO2e (t)

2008 2018

Electricity (kWh) 7 1.01 8

With a very small annual growth rate in this sector, GHG emissions are forecast to increase by approximately 0.07 tonnes over ten years (assuming the emissions coefficient for electricity remains constant). It should be noted that LED technology for overhead street lights is currently available, although it may not be cost effective for local govern-ments to implement at this time. This is particularly true for the SCRD, which does not own a large number of street lights.

4.3 Reduction InitiativesParking lot lights and overhead street lights consume most of the energy in this sector. There are very few options for energy reductions because of the small amount of energy consumed.

Table 4.3 summarizes the estimated reductions in energy use, energy costs and GHG emissions for the proposed reduction initiatives (as approved by the Board on an annual basis).

It is estimated that a very modest 114 GJ of energy can be saved by implementing lighting retrofits, which would result in energy savings of approximately $9,000 and a reduction of CO

2e emissions of approximately one tonne.

Table 4.3 – Summary of Proposed Reduction Initiatives for the Outdoor Lighting Sector

LightingConsumption CO2e (t)

Annual Savings



Five Years

115 GJ 1 t$10,892TOTAL THIS SECTOR:

SUBTOTALS 31,911 kWh $10,892 1 tElectricity $32,676 $54,461 $76,245

There are very limited opportunities to reduce energy use in the outdoor lighting sector due to the low number of out-door lighting accounts that consume a significant amount of energy.

Parking Lot Lighting

The parking lot lighting in all recreational facilities could be retrofitted with dimmers and/or photocells, which would result in a small savings.

Overhead Street lights

LED technology is advancing at a rapid rate and manufacturers claim a 30 percent to 40 percent reduction in electric-ity consumption over currently available technology. With better optics and brighter LEDs, this type of technology has the potential to reduce electrical consumption for street lights even further.

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

26


5.1 Water & Wastewater OverviewOverall, 8,051 GJ of energy was consumed in the water and wastewater sector, at a cost of $162,754 and resulted in the release of 81 tonnes of CO

2e (Table 5.1.1).

Table 5.1.1 – Summary of Water and Wastewater Sector Emissions (2008)T 2.1 T 2.1.4 T 2.1.5

8,051 $162,754 81

$150,4952,041,877kWhElectricity 7,351 44.9

$12,259700GJNatural Gas 700 35.8

Water & Wastewater

Sector

Totals

Energy Type& Units

Total Energy(GJ)

TotalCO2e (t)

TotalCosts


The SCRD operates a number of water and wastewater facilities in rural locations throughout the district. These include one major potable water treatment plant, one booster pump station, nine liquid waste package treatment plants, six deep water wells, 14 potable water pump stations, five potable water reservoirs, and one rechlorination station.

The potable water treatment plant is powered by electricity (717,331 kWh) and uses natural gas for space heating and domestic hot water (700 GJ). Diesel fuel is also used as a backup energy source for backup generators (note: the consumption for the backup generators is listed in the vehicle fleet sector under ‘generators’).

The potable water treatment plant and potable water pump stations incur the most costs for energy consumption (figure 5.1.1).

Figure 5.1.1 – Costs for Energy in the Water and Wastewater Subsectors (2008)

9.5%

0.1%

9.9%

0.0%

16.4%

29.3%

0.2%

32.1%

0.9%

1.5%

Booster Pump Station Liquid Waste Lift Station

Liquid Waste Treatment Plant Misc.

Potable Water Deep Well Potable Water Pump Station

Potable Water Reservoir Potable Water Treatment

Rechlorination Station Sewage Lagoon

developer

27

Table 5.1.2 – Water and Wastewater Ranked by Energy Consumption (2008)

Table 5.1.2 presents the top 10 energy consuming water and wastewater accounts of a total of 40 accounts. The remaining water and wastewater accounts can be viewed in Appendix I. The top energy consumer in the water and wastewater sector is the Chapman Creek Water Treatment Plant. Together with the related Chapman Creek Pump Sta-tion (the Booster Pump Station), the water treatment plant accounts for over half of the energy consumption, under half the energy costs and three-quarters of the emissions in this sector. The Chapman Creek Water Treatment Plant consumes a significant amount of energy relative to other accounts in the water and wastewater sector because it is the only one that uses natural gas for space heating in the treatment plant.

5.2 Water and Wastewater ForecastStaff have indicated that the capacity of the Chapman Creek Water Treatment Plant will increase in the forecast period. There are currently two treatment trains in the existing plant with one more treatment train proposed. Seven additional liquid waste treatment plants are proposed in this sector as well as additional pumps to increase capacity in some locations. The later forecast for liquid waste treatment plants is based on estimates of growth patterns in rural areas serviced by SCRD water and wastewater infrastructure.

The capacity of the Chapman Creek Water Treatment Plant will increase by one-third over the forecast period, which could increase the electricity consumption and costs in the water and wastewater sector by approximately 200,000 kWh and $14,000 annually at a rate of approximately $0.07/kWh. This increase is for motors, overhead lighting and in-creased ultraviolet lighting for disinfection. An increase in natural gas consumption for space heating is also antici-pated, but forecast at 7% relative to the amount of additional space heating required in the treatment plant.

Accordingly, the forecast percent is estimated at 11% in this sector (table 5.2.1). Table 5.2.2 provides a forecast of projected energy consumption to 2018. Table 5.2.2 provides a forecast of projected costs for energy consumption to 2018.

: Top Energy ConsumersWater & Wastewater CO2eCostsEnergy

Chapman Creek Water Treatment Plant - B-5642 Reservoir Rd 3,283 GJ $52,306 51.6 t

Chapman Creek Pump Station - 5642 Reservoir Rd A 731 GJ $15,456 4.5 t

Chaster Road Well - Chaster Road Pump Stn| Knight & V 545 GJ $10,783 3.3 t

Langdale Well - Port Mellon Hwy 488 GJ $12,303 3.0 t

Garden Bay Waterworks Dist - Garden Bay Rd 476 GJ $11,482 2.9 t

Sandy Hook Pump Station - Sechelt Inlet Rd 354 GJ $8,038 2.2 t

Payne Rd Pump Station - 1056 Reed Rd 342 GJ $7,808 2.1 t

Selma Pump Station - Patterson Rd 200 GJ $5,499 1.2 t

Emery Road Treatment Plant - 1131 Emery Rd Pump 179 GJ $4,098 1.1 t

Roberts Creek Pump Station - Sun Cst Hwy 176 GJ $4,440 1.1 t

Payne Rd Pump Station - 1056 Reed Rd 141 GJ $3,238 0.9 t

Scrd Infrastructure - 12710 Lagoon Rd Sew 107 GJ $2,470 0.7 t

Jolly Roger Sewage Treatment Plant - Jolly Roger Sewage 101 GJ $2,336 0.6 t

Secret Cove Marina Treatment Plant - 5471 Secret Cove Rd 99 GJ $2,289 0.6 t

Soames Well - Port Mellon Hwy 92 GJ $2,129 0.6 t

Woodcreek Treatment Plant - Oceanview Dr 77 GJ $1,801 0.5 t

Cove Cay Pump Station - Sun Cst Hwy 67 GJ $1,568 0.4 t

Lee Bay Treatment Plant - 4336 Orca Rd 61 GJ $1,431 0.4 t

Selma Pump Station - Patterson Rd 59 GJ $1,324 0.4 t

Rechlorination Station - Sun Cst Hwy 59 GJ $1,388 0.4 t

Square Bay Sewage Treatment Plant - 5320 Susan Way 59 GJ $1,396 0.4 t

Granthams Landing Pump Station - Marine Dr 58 GJ $1,357 0.4 t

Orca Road Pump Station - 4295 Orca Rd 53 GJ $1,261 0.3 t

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2008 Rank


SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

28

Table 5.2.1 – Predicted Growth by Sector

Sector Deletions and Additions from 2008 to 2018 Forecast Percent (2018)

Water and Wastewater

Additional capacity at Chapman Creek Water Treatment Plant of 11% translates into a blended forecast of 4% for electricity (~80,000kWh) and

7% for natural gas (~80GJ). Seven additional package treatment plants to be added up to 2018 to accommodate new construction.

11%

Table 5.2.2 – Forecast of Water and Wastewater Consumption


(GJ)Forecasted

Percent Forecasted

Consumption

Forecasted Total Energy

(GJ)2008 2018

Electricity (kWh) 2,041,877 7,351 1.04 7,645 8,394

Nat Gas (GJ) 700 700 1.07 749

Table 5.2.3 – Forecast of Water and Wastewater Costs

Energy Type/Unit Consumption Unit

Cost Costs Forecasted Consumption

Forecasted Unit Cost

Forecasted Costs

Forecasted Total Costs

2008 2018

Electricity (kWh)

2,041,877 $0.061 $150,495 2,118,877 $0.08 $169,510 $180,745

Nat Gas (GJ) 700 $12 $12,259 749 $15 $11,235

Table 5.2.4 – Forecast of Emissions

Energy Type Emissions CO2e (t)

Total CO2e (t)

Forecast Percent

Forecasted Emissions CO2e (t)

Forecasted Total Emissions CO2e (t)

2008 2018

Electricity (kWh) 4581

1.04 4785

Nat Gas (GJ) 36 1.07 39

5.3 Reduction InitiativesSmall reductions in the water and wastewater sector are possible, although quantifying these reductions is difficult since reductions will occur as older motors are replaced with newer, higher efficiency models. There are no other quantitative reduction initiatives to apply to this sector because the opportunities are limited and the payback pe-riod for new motors is generally 15 to 25 years, depending on the duty cycle of the motor and the volume of water pumped. The longer payback to replace a pump makes it difficult for SCRD staff to justify replacing a pump before its useful life has ended.

29


The SCRD has completed the following initiatives:

Selecting high-efficiency motors for new pumps and pump stations or when replacing aging pumps; i.

Launching a free bathroom fixture replacement program (e.g., showerheads, faucet aerators, and dual flush ii. toilets) for residential and commercial water customers;

Rolling out a rebate program for SCRD water customers to replace older 13 litre/flush toilets with high ef-iii. ficiency toilets ($200 rebate) or low flow toilets ($100 rebate);

Providing waterwise gardening information and maintaining a demonstration garden; and,iv.

Developing a water efficiency awards program for commercial and industrial water customers.v.

Proposed Reduction Measures, Reduction Quantity, and Capital Costs

Table 5.3 summarizes the estimated reductions in energy use, energy costs and GHG emissions for the proposed reduction initiatives (as approved by the Board on an annual basis).

Table 5.3 – Summary of Proposed Reduction Initiatives for the Water and Wastewater Sector

Water & WastewaterConsumption CO2e (t)

Annual Savings



Five Years

753 GJ 5 t$17,481TOTAL THIS SECTOR:

SUBTOTALS 209,038 kWh $17,481 5 tElectricity $52,442 $87,403 $122,365

The following reduction initiatives are proposed:

Install low-flow toilets, dual flush toilets, waterless urinals, tankless urinals, tap sensors and other water-i. saving de-vices in corporate buildings. The estimated costs to replace all fixtures can be calculated if the regional district counts the number and type of fixtures in their facilities that require replacement;

Install meters on all corporate facilities to account for water use and eliminate any water loss. Meters vary ii. in cost from $400 to $800;

Continue with lawn-watering restrictions;iii.

Increase water conservation awareness (e.g. through school campaigns and public awareness programs);iv.

Conduct industrial/commercial water audits and implement residential water audits to reduce demand on v. potable water pumps and to conserve water.. Costs vary and must be further explored. Collaboration with the member municipalities is imperative;

Discourage garburators in new development and encourage residents to remove existing garburators to vi. reduce demand on the wastewater treatment plants and to reduce demand on sanitary pump stations; and,

Continue to replace old motors and pumps with high-efficiency models. Costs vary depending on wheth-vii. er the motor needs replacing/rewinding or the entire pump assembly needs replacement.

It is very difficult to calculate the impact of these energy reduction initiatives on the water and wastewater sector. A reduction quantity of approximately 5 tonnes CO2e is currently estimated.

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

30

6 Vehicle Fleet

6.1 Vehicle Fleet OverviewThe vehicle fleet includes all motorized vehicles operated by the Regional District. In 2008, the SCRD’s vehicles pro-duced 440 tonnes of CO

2e and fuel costs were $197,731. Table 6.1.1 summarizes emissions by fuel type. Propane is

consumed by one vehicle and the ice-surfacing equipment at the arenas.

Table 6.1.2 ranks the top ten vehicles by energy use. The transit buses owned by BC Transit are not included in the emissions inventory because the SCRD does not own these buses. Note that for the purposes of calculating the offset required to become carbon neutral under the Climate Action Charter, the Province of BC may not require that public transit be part of the calculation. However, the SCRD must investigate whether or not the province will rebate the gas tax paid on fuel for the buses, since the SCRD pays for this fuel. For a complete list of vehicle fleet accounts, see Appendix I.

Table 6.1.1 – Summary of Vehicle Fleet Sector Emissions (2008)

6,137 $197,731 440

Gasoline $108,47394,468litres 3,274 235.9

Diesel Fuel $84,97270,511litres 2,727 196.0

5,358litres 136 $4,286 8.1PropaneMbl

Vehicle Fleet

Sector

Totals

Energy Type& Units

Total Energy(GJ)

TotalCO2e (t)

TotalCosts


Table 6.1.2 – Ranking of Vehicle Fleet (2008)

Individual vehicle records indicate that the recycling truck uses the most energy and produces the most emissions due to the number of kilometres this vehicle is driven each year. For a complete list of vehicle accounts, see Appendix I. Figure 6.1.1 illustrates the relative fuel costs across vehicle subsectors.

: Top Energy ConsumersVehicle Fleet CO2eCostsEnergy

2006 International Recycling - 409 927 GJ $28,686 66.6 t

F350 Sbody - 357 296 GJ $9,933 21.3 t

2004 Ford F350 - 397 292 GJ $9,648 21.0 t

John Deere Backhoe - 404 279 GJ $8,419 20.0 t

South Pender Harbour Water Works - 190 GJ $6,661 13.7 t

2008 F450 Superduty - 426 160 GJ $4,964 11.5 t

Gibsons Volunteer Fire Department - 149 GJ $5,198 10.7 t

2002 Ford Ranger - 361 136 GJ $4,545 9.8 t

2007 F350 4x4 Extended Cab W/ Itb Flat Deck - 415 131 GJ $4,049 9.4 t

95 Intl. 5-Ton Dump - 332 129 GJ $3,917 9.3 t

2000 Ford F250 - 354 120 GJ $3,527 8.6 t

2004 Chevrolet Silvr. P/Up - 411 114 GJ $3,771 8.2 t

2005 Pisten Bully Pb100 - 410 111 GJ $2,930 8.0 t

2007 F350 4x2 W/ Reading Service Body - 416 109 GJ $3,426 7.8 t

2007 Ford Ranger Flatdeck - 413 105 GJ $3,109 7.6 t

99 Ford F350 - 318 99 GJ $3,046 7.1 t

2004 Chev Trckr 4drht - 396 98 GJ $3,206 7.0 t

2000 F250 Ford - 354 93 GJ $3,146 6.7 t

North Pender Harbour Water System And Generator - 92 GJ $3,125 6.6 t

Ranger 4x4 2003 - 389 89 GJ $2,964 6.4 t

Water/Wastewater Vehicle - 389 89 GJ $2,964 6.4 t

2007 Ford Ranger Flat Deck - 413 89 GJ $3,025 6.4 t

2000 Suzuki Vitra - 353 86 GJ $2,814 6.2 t

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2008 Rank


31

Figure 6.1.1 – Costs for Energy in the Vehicle Fleet Subsectors (2008)

0.5%

29.3%

6.5%

5.1%

30.2%

10.5%

0.4%

8.4%

5.3%

2.8%

1.0%

Diesel Fuel Light Trucks, Vans & Buses Diesel Fuel Medium to Heavy Trucks

Diesel Fuel Off Road Vehicles & Equipment Fire Services

Gasoline Light Trucks, Vans, and SUVs Gasoline Medium to Heavy Trucks & Vans

Gasoline Off Road Vehicles & Equipment Gasoline Passenger Cars

Generators Misc.

Propane Equipment

Gasoline light trucks, vans and SUVs, and diesel-fuel medium to heavy trucks, each make up ~30 percent of fuel costs respectively. Other significant costs are incurred by gasoline medium to heavy trucks and vans (11 percent).

We calculated GHG emissions for two groups of vehicles that are either directly or indirectly associated with the op-erations of the SCRD, although they were not reported here as part of the total emissions.

The first group of vehicles is the public transit buses operated by the SCRD but owned by BC Transit. In accordance with existing protocols, these buses are not counted in the SCRD’s corporate inventory because they are not owned by the district. Transit buses consumed 240,000 litres of diesel fuel in 2008, resulting in approximately 670 tonnes CO

2e. (See Appendix II for the fuel consumption and resulting GHG emissions for transit buses).

The second group of vehicles is those owned by SCRD employees to commute to and from work. These vehicles are indirectly associated with the district and have been included for information only. The SCRD initiated a voluntary survey of staff to attempt to calculate GHG emissions related to employee commuting. Unfortunately, only 35 percent of staff (82 out of a total of 235 staff ) responded to the survey. Of the 82 respondents, the average fuel consumption of vehicles owned by SCRD staff that are driven to and from work was 10.7 litres/100 km, the total estimated distance driven in one year to and from work was 468,826 kilometres, and the estimated fuel consumption was 48,575 litres of gasoline and 898 litres of diesel fuel. The resulting estimates of GHG emissions was 124 tonnes CO

2e. A simplified

extrapolation of this data to estimate the total GHG emissions from employee commuting for 235 SCRD staff resulted in 339 tonnes CO

2e (note: due to a high variability in kilometres driven to and from work (range = 1 to 88 kilometres),

the resulting extrapolation should be used with caution).

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

32

6.2 Vehicle Fleet ForecastIt is difficult to forecast growth in the vehicle sector because it depends on the SCRD’s future service levels to the community. A forecast of one percent growth from the inventory year was estimated based on the number of vehicles that may be added to the fleet in the forecast period and the number of vehicles estimated to be replaced during the project period (e.g., at least 11 vehicles). These estimates are based on typical turnover periods, although actual fleet vehicle replacement depends on a decision by the fleet manager, the manager of the department that owns the vehicle and the Board. We have assumed that replacement vehicles are like-for-like replacements (e.g., a car replaces a car and a truck replaces a truck) and blended the reduction based on the fuel efficiencies of current model years with the addition of new vehicles. Lower fuel consumption rates for new vehicles will result in lower GHG emis-sions in this sector.

Table 6.2.1 – Predicted Growth in the Vehicle Fleet Sector

Sector Deletions and Additions from 2008 to 2018 Forecast Percent (2018)

Vehicle Fleet

No additions to the fleet are expected; however, fleet fuel consumption should rise with increasing service levels as the community grows. Replacing older vehicles will improve fuel efficiency over the forecast period. A 20% blend of biodiesel by 2010 has also been included in the forecast

1%

Fuel price uncertainty is an important factor in both the forecast of energy consumption (table 6.2.2) and energy costs (table 6.2.3). The price of gasoline and diesel fuel are the most difficult to predict. The prediction of $2.50/litre of gasoline and $2.25/litre of diesel fuel is considered conservative and is based on a reputable source (Nesbitt Burns Oil & Gas Research - Oil & Gas Weekly).

Forecasts of fuel prices are highly dependent on local and global economies and current politics in oil-producing countries. In late 2008 and early 2009, fuel price adjustments paralleled the declining global economy, and although the cur-rent downturn in the economy is not expected to extend through to the end of the project period (e.g., 10 years), a rise in gasoline and diesel fuel prices is still anticipated in the near future. In 2008, fuel costs were $190,230, and they are anticipated to rise to $373,515 in 2018.

Table 6.2.2 – Forecast of Vehicle Fleet Consumption


(GJ)Forecasted

Percent Forecasted Energy (GJ)

Forecasted Total Energy (GJ)

2008 2018

Gasoline (L) 94,468 3,274 1.01 3,307

6,197 Diesel Fuel (L) 70,511 2,727 1.01 2,754

Propane (L) 5,358 136 1 136

Table 6.2.3 – Forecast of Vehicle Fleet Costs

Energy Type/Unit Consumption Unit Costs Costs Total Cost Forecasted

Unit cost Forecasted

CostsForecasted Total Costs

2008 2018

Gasoline (L) 94,468 $1.15 108,473

$197,731

$2.25 $214,679

$398,077 Diesel Fuel (L) 70,511 $1.33 $84,972 $2.5 $178,040

Propane 5,358 $0.85 $4,286 1 $5,358

33

Table 6.2.4 – Forecast of Vehicle Fleet Emissions

Energy Type

Emissions CO2e (t)

Total CO2e (t)

Forecast Percent

Forecasted Emis-sions CO2e (t)

Forecasted Total Emissions CO2e (t)

2008 2018

Gasoline (L) 236

440

1.01 238

444 Diesel Fuel (L) 196 1.01 198

Propane (L) 8 1 8

6.3 Reduction InitiativesAdministrative Recommendations

A number of administrative recommendations are suggested as follows:

1. Propose a Board Resolution to purchase fuel-efficient vehicles as a priority over price point. This initiative will en-sure that fuel efficiency is given greater priority when making vehicle purchases.

2. Centralize the fleet to provide a consistent approach to vehicle purchases and allow the fleet manager to imple-ment policies that incorporate fuel efficiency into the purchasing and ongoing maintenance of vehicles. This initiative is to ensure that the fleet manager is able to integrate fuel efficiency with regular fleet maintenance and integrate preventative maintenance practices, replacement schedules, vehicle right sizing and shared use of vehicles among staff as appropriate.


Reduction measures in the vehicle fleet sector are difficult to track from year to year since vehicle use (as indicated by the kilometres travelled for individual vehicles in a given year) depends on factors that are not tracked (such as the number of projects undertaken by staff, location of projects within the regional district boundary, proximity of projects to vehicle home base, etc.).

One reduction initiative in this sector is the replacement of fleet vehicles’ fuel management system to i. ensure fuel consumption tracking and reporting.


Table 6.3.1 summarizes the estimated reductions in energy use, energy costs and GHG emissions for proposed reduc-tion initiatives (as approved by the Board on an annual basis).

Table 6.3.1 – Proposed Reduction Initiatives in the Vehicle Fleet Sector

Vehicle FleetConsumption CO2e (t)

Annual Savings



Five Years

1,074 GJ 72 t$32,198TOTAL THIS SECTOR:

SUBTOTALS 8,264 L $9,871 23 t19,511 L $22,327 49 tGasoline

Diesel Fuel $29,612$66,982

$49,353$111,637

$69,095$156,292

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

34

The following reduction initiatives are proposed:

Provide a pool of vehicles for staff use while on Regional District business. Staff should investigate estab-i. lishing a pool of fuel-efficient vehicles, or other sustainable transportation modes, available for their use on business so that they have the option of commuting to work by non-auto modes (e.g., if staff must use their personal vehicle for business, then they must drive their car to and from work);

Establish a video conference system in key SCRD buildings (such as the works yard and the Administration ii. Building) to reduce the need to travel to meetings. Staff should with ask their peer networks in other orga-nizations whether they have similar technology and encourage peer organizations to incorporate similar technology;

Ensure that vehicle purchases are not solely based on life-cycle costs and end residual value. Purchase iii. decisions must emphasize fuel efficiency (given the rising cost of fuel) and should ensure that the vehicle is right-sized for the task it is being purchased for. The fleet manager must adjust the weighting of price point so that vehicle equipment and fuel efficiency are carefully balanced according to specific vehicle use (equipment, number of crew, ancillary equipment, towing capabilities, etc.);

Establish regular and accurate fuel consumption and fuel efficiency reporting so that staff understand how iv. their vehicle is performing and how their driving behaviour affects fuel efficiency;

Provide driver training for new and existing staff;v.

Adopt an Idle Free Policy to discourage unnecessary vehicle idling across all departments, including per-vi. sonal vehicle use while on SCRD business;

Ensure that all new passenger vehicles are as fuel efficient as possible for their prescribed use. All new light vii. trucks and utility vehicles that do not have heavy load requirements should be as fuel efficient as possible. Testing of electric-gasoline hybrid vehicles is important, as is the availability of locally trained mechanics that are certified to work on such vehicles;

Inflate tires with nitrogen; viii.

Specify tier 3 emissions control equipment in tenders for medium to heavy trucks. The recycling truck ix. (vehicle # 409) should be retrofitted with a diesel oxidation catalyst;

Track maintenance costs to help establish a replacement schedule; and,x.

Replace two-stroke engines with four-stroke engines where available (e.g., small equipment).xi.


These reduction initiatives would result in savings of approximately 1,100 GJ of energy (e.g., 8,000 litres of diesel fuel and 19,000 litres of gasoline) at an approximate cost savings of $32,000, calculated at 2008 costs for gasoline and diesel fuel. The estimated energy reductions would result in an emissions reduction of 72 tonnes CO

2e.

The reduction estimate includes various reduction measures that have been applied to classes of similar vehicles as presented in the subsections that follow.

Diesel Fuel Fire Department Vehicles

Proposed diesel oxidation catalysts (efficient technology) for heavy fire department trucks have an insignificant effect on GHG emissions, but are included as an initiative that reduces particulate matter and nitrous oxide emissions (non-GHG emissions). An advanced fuel management system is also proposed. The total reductions in energy consump-tion, costs, and CO

2e (t) are provided in the table below.Vehicle Fleet


Annual Savings



Five Years


Reductions After Implementation

CostsDIESEL FUEL FIRE DEPT.

Three Year Seven Years

Simple Payback

Five Years

TOTAL THIS SUBSECTOR: 7 GJ 1 t$246

35

Diesel Fuel Off-Road Vehicles

Reduction initiatives for this vehicle class include using biodiesel fuel (20 percent) which would save approximately 5 tonnes CO

2e. The total reductions in energy consumption, costs, and CO

2e (t) are provided in the table below.



CostsDIESEL FUEL OFF ROAD VEHICLES


Simple Payback

Five Years

TOTAL THIS SUBSECTOR: 71 GJ 5 t$2,092

Diesel Fuel Medium to Heavy Trucks

With the large number of medium to heavy trucks consuming diesel fuel in the fleet, measures such as energy aware driver training, fuel consumption awareness, anti-idling, trip reduction measures, nitrogen tire inflation and tire audits would reduce GHG emissions from diesel fuel consumption by approximately 22 tonnes CO

2e. The total reductions in

energy consumption, costs, and CO2e (t) are provided in the table below.



CostsDIESEL FUEL MEDIUM TO HEAVY


Simple Payback

Five Years


Gasoline Cars, Light Trucks, Vans and Buses

Reduction initiatives for this vehicle class include an idle free policy, energy aware driver training, fuel consumption awareness, trip reduction measures, telecommuting and advanced fuel management systems. The total reductions in energy consumption, costs, and CO




CostsGASOLINE CARS, LIGHT TRUCKS


Simple Payback

Five Years


Gasoline Medium to Heavy Duty Trucks

The measures assigned to this vehicle class are similar to those assigned to gasoline light trucks, vans and buses. The total reductions in energy consumption, costs, and CO




CostsGASOLINE MEDIUM TO HEAVY


Simple Payback

Five Years


SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

36

7 Corporate Solid Waste

Solid waste generated in the Regional District facilities accounts for nine percent of total corporate emissions and resulted in 155 tonnes of CO

2e in 2008. The amount of solid waste produced is proportional to the occupancy and

function of the facility, and as a result, it is not appropriate to rank or compare such accounts.

In the future, the Province of BC may require local governments that have signed the Climate Action Charter to track emissions from any paper that is not recycled and ends up in a landfill or is incinerated.

7.1 Reduction InitiativesInitiatives already completed include paper, cardboard, plastic, metal and glass recycling in most SCRD facilities. Paper plates and cups are no longer used at SCRD functions that require catering, which reduces waste to the landfill (note: paper plates and cups are generally discarded and not recycled).

Unwritten policies regarding paperless systems and paper reduction initiatives include making digital copies of packages for Managers’ meetings and some departmental staff meetings, and choosing a double-sided default print setting on all network printers. The use of banner sheets for print jobs has been discontinued.

Significant reduction measures that staff can implement to reduce corporate solid waste in the SCRD’s buildings are as follows:

Expand recycling and compost facilities for staff and the public in SCRD-owned buildings;i.

Conduct a waste composition study and accurately track the volume and/or tonnes of waste from corpo-ii. rate facilities;

Ensure that all paper and cardboard are deposited in the appropriate recycling receptacle;iii.

Ensure that all staff have recycling containers either at their workstation or in close proximity to their work-iv. station. Department heads must include recycling containers for staff in their annual budgets;

Increase recycling of #4 plastic (e.g., plastic films such as plastic wrapping);v.

Convert to paperless systems wherever possible and practical;vi.

Encourage network printers and double-sided copying and printing; and, vii.

Supplement these initiatives with employee education.viii.

These initiatives could result in 16 tonnes CO2e or approximately 10 percent of the total CO

2e in the solid waste sector

in 2008. This is a rough estimate and is primarily based on reducing paper through paperless systems and double-sided copying and printing.

37

8 Summary

In 2008, the buildings sector ranked first in total energy consumed, energy costs and GHG emissions. Following build-ings, a significant amount of energy is consumed by the vehicle fleet sector.

A summary of overall emissions is provided in table 8.1.

Table 8.1 – Inventory Summary

Parameter 2008

Energy Consumption 52,230 GJEnergy Costs $988,569Emissions 1,806 tonnes CO2e

Summary of Corporate Emission Reductions There are many opportunities for new GHG reductions within the SCRD’s operations. By implementing the initiatives described in Sections 3 through 7, and further described in the Technical Compendium of Reduction Initiatives, the SCRD would be able to reduce GHG emissions by 28 percent over the forecast period. Table 8.2 provides a summary of the potential reductions in each corporate sector.

Table 8.2 – Summary of Estimated Impact of Reduction Measures on the Corporate Sectors

Sector2008 Base

Year Emissions (tonnes CO2e)

2018 Emissions Projection

(tonnes CO2e)

Reductions from 2010-2018

Implementation

Emissions after

Reductions (2018)

Overall Percent

Reduction (2018)

Buildings 1,123 1,179 469 710 -37%

Outdoor Lighting1 7 8 1 7 0%

Water and Wastewater2 81 85 5 80 -1%

Vehicle Fleet 440 444 72 372 -15%

Corporate Solid Waste3 155 159 16 143 -8%

Totals 1,806 1,875 563 1,312 -27%

1 Lighting includes all overhead streetlights owned by the SCRD, sportsfield lighting, parking lots, etc.

2 The estimate in the water and wastewater sector is qualitative

3 Solid waste from all SCRD facilities

Reduction Target Statement:

The Sunshine Coast Regional District can reduce GHG emissions by 27 percent by reducing its 2008 base year emissions quantity by 563 tonnes CO2e by 2018.

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

38

Glossary of Terms (IPCC 2006)Carbon dioxide (CO2): A naturally occurring gas; also a byproduct of burning fossil fuels and biomass, as well as land use changes and other industrial processes. It is the principal anthropogenic greenhouse gas that affects the earth’s radiative balance. It is the reference gas against which other greenhouse gases are measured and therefore has a Global Warming Potential of 1.

Climate change: A statistically significant variation in either the mean state of the climate or in its variability, persist-ing for an extended period (typically decades or longer). Climate change may be due to natural internal processes or external forcings, or to persistent anthropogenic changes in the composition of the atmosphere or in land use.

Note that the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), in its Article 1, defines “climate change” as “a change of climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate variability observed over comparable time periods.” The UNFCCC thus makes a distinction between “climate change” attributable to human activities altering the atmospheric composition and “climate variability” attributable to natural causes.

Equivalent CO2 (CO2e): The concentration of CO2 that would cause the same amount of radiative forcing as a given

mixture of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.

GJ (GigaJoules): A Canadian unit of heating value equivalent to 943,213.3 Btu. The standard gas unit in Canada is the gigajoule pursuant to GISB under Order 587-A (1997). A gigajoule (GJ) is a metric term used for measuring energy use. For example, 1 GJ is equal to 277.8 kWh of electricity, 26.9 m³ of natural gas, 25.9 litres of heating oil. Similar to the energy released when burning a million wooden matches, a gigajoule of gas will cook over 2500 hamburgers, and a gigajoule of electricity will keep a 60-watt bulb continuously lit for six months.

Greenhouse gas: Gaseous constituents of the atmosphere, both natural and anthropogenic, that absorb and emit radiation at specific wavelengths within the spectrum of infrared radiation emitted by the Earth’s surface, the atmo-sphere, and clouds. This property of greenhouse gases causes the greenhouse effect. Water vapour (H

2O), carbon

dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N

2O), methane (CH

4) and ozone (O

3) are the primary greenhouse gases in the Earth’s

atmosphere. Moreover, there are a number of entirely human-made greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as the halocarbons and other chlorine- and bromine-containing substances, dealt with under the Montreal Protocol. Besides CO

2, N

2O, and CH

4, the Kyoto Protocol deals with the greenhouse gases sulphur hexafluoride (SF

6), hydrofluorocar-

bons (HFCs), and perfluorocarbons (PFCs).

Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC): The Kyoto Proto-col was adopted at the Third Session of the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UNFCCC in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan. It contains legally binding commitments in addition to those included in the UNFCCC. Countries included in Annex B of the Protocol (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries and countries with economies in transition) agreed to reduce their anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, and SF6) by at least 5% below 1990 levels in the commitment period 2008 to 2012. The Kyoto Protocol entered into force on February 16, 2005.

Methane (CH4): An odorless, colorless, flammable gas, CH4, the major constituent of natural gas, that is used as a fuel

and is an important source of hydrogen and a wide variety of organic compounds.

Nitrous Oxide (N2O): A powerful greenhouse gas with a global warming potential most recently evaluated at 310. Major sources of nitrous oxide include soil cultivation practices, especially the use of commercial and organic fertil-izers, fossil fuel combustion, nitric acid production, and biomass burning.

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC): The Convention was adopted on May 9, 1992, in New York and signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro by more than 150 countries and the European Community. Its ultimate objective is the “stabilisation of greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system.” It contains commit-ments for all parties. Under the Convention, parties included in Annex I aim to return greenhouse gas emissions not controlled by the Montreal Protocol to 1990 levels by the year 2000. The convention entered into force in March 1994. See: Kyoto Protocol.

39

Appendix I - Detailed GHG Emissions Inventory (2008)

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

dd

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mp

tion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

2008

BU

ILD

ING

S

Ad

min

istr

atio

n O

ffice

s

AD

MIN

ISTR

ATI

ON

BU

ILD

ING

- 19

75 F

IELD

RD

$3

1,7

03

1,7

19

GJ

$3

1,7

03

10

.5 t

10

.5 t

47

7,5

81

kW

h1

,71

9G

JE

lectr

icity

Ad

min

istr

atio

n O

ffice

s Su

bto

tal

1,7

19

GJ

$3

1,7

03

10

.5 t

$3

1,7

03

47

7,5

81

kW

hE

lectr

icity

1,7

19

GJ

10

.5 t

Cem

eter

y

SEA

VIEW

CEM

ETER

Y - 1

706

LOW

ER R

D$

66

0 G

J$

66

0.0

t0

.0 t

21

kW

h0

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Cem

eter

y Su

bto

tal

0 G

J$

66

0.0

t$

66

21

kW

hE

lectr

icity

0G

J0

.0 t

Com

mu

nit

y H

all

CH

AST

ER H

OU

SE -

1549

OC

EAN

BEA

CH

ESP

$4

69

$1

,90

1

84

GJ

$2

,37

04

.6 t

0.1

t

4.5

t

6,3

92

kW

h

1,5

84

litre

s

23

GJ

61

GJ

Fu

elO

il

Ele

ctr

icity

CO

OPE

RS G

REEN

HA

LL -

RED

ROO

FFS R

D P

164L

$1

,31

35

6 G

J$

1,3

13

0.3

t0

.3 t

15

,55

5kW

h5

6G

JE

lectr

icity

ERIC

CA

RDIN

AL H

ALL

- SH

IRLE

Y M

AC

EY P

ARK

CH

AM

BERL

IN R

D$

96

9

$2

,96

2

19

2 G

J$

3,9

31

8.0

t0

.2 t

7.7

t

11

,21

3kW

h

15

1G

J

40

GJ

15

1G

JN

atu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

F RA

NK

WES

T HA

LL -

1224

CH

AST

ER R

D$

94

54

0 G

J$

94

50

.2 t

0.2

t1

1,0

62

kW

h4

0G

JE

lectr

icity

GRA

NTH

AM

S LA

ND

ING

CO

MM

UN

ITY

HA

LL -

846

CH

URC

H R

D$

1,6

89

73

GJ

$1

,68

90

.4 t

0.4

t2

0,1

81

kW

h7

3G

JE

lectr

icity

Com

mun

ity

Hal

l Sub

tota

l4

45

GJ

$1

0,2

48

13

.7 t

$5

,38

56

4,4

03

kW

hE

lectr

icity

23

2G

J1

.4 t

$2

,96

21

51

GJ

Na

tura

lG

as

15

1G

J7

.7 t

$1

,90

11

,58

4lit

res

61

GJ

4.5

tF

ue

lO

il

Fire

Ser

vice

s

28/0

6/20

0920

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Ener

gy

& E

mis

sion

s M

onit

orin

g a

nd

Rep

orti

ng

Sys

tem

™

v.3.

01

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

40

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

EGM

ON

T AN

D D

ISTR

ICT F

IRE H

ALL

TEM

PORA

RY A

CC

OU

NT -

559

2 EG

MO

NT R

D$857

35 G

J$857

0.2

t0.2

t9,6

34

kW

h35

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

FRA

NK

WES

T FIR

E HA

LL -

1226

CH

AST

ER R

D$1,4

57

62 G

J$1,4

57

0.4

t0.4

t17,3

45

kW

h62

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GIB

SON

S FIR

E HA

LL -

790

NO

RTH

RD

$3,9

33

$3,6

02

354 G

J$7,5

35

10.3

t1.1

t

9.3

t

47,8

94

kW

h

181

GJ

172

GJ

181

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

HA

LFM

OO

N B

AY

FIRE

HA

LL -

8972

RED

ROO

FFS R

D$4,8

23

330 G

J$8,5

26

8.4

t

$3,7

03

1.3

t

7.1

t

59,1

29

kW

h

4,6

29

litre

s

213

GJ

117

GJ

Pro

pane

Ele

ctr

icity

HA

LFM

OO

N B

AY

FIRE

HA

LL S

ATE

LLIT

E STA

TIO

N -

7884

FA

WN

RD

$699

36 G

J$699

0.2

t0.2

t9,9

25

kW

h36

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

ROBE

RTS C

REEK

FIR

E HA

LL -

1302

RO

BERT

S CRE

EK R

D$3,9

96

176 G

J$3,9

96

1.1

t1.1

t48,9

31

kW

h176

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Fire

Ser

vice

s Su

bto

tal

993 G

J$23,0

70

20.6

t$15,7

65

192,8

58

kW

hE

lectr

icity

694

GJ

4.2

t

$3,6

02

181

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

181

GJ

9.3

t

Pro

pane

4,6

29

litre

s117

$3,7

03

GJ

7.1

t

Ice

Are

nas

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

ENTR

E - 7

00 P

ARK

RD

TEM

P$951

43 G

J$951

0.3

t0.3

t11,9

57

kW

h43

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

ENTR

E - 7

00 P

ARK

RD

$68,7

00

$27,3

30

6,0

08 G

J$96,0

30

118.8

t25.6

t

93.2

t

1,1

62,6

88

kW

h

1,8

22

GJ

4,1

86

GJ

1,8

22

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

S UN

SHIN

E CO

AST

ARE

NA -

598

6 SH

OA

L WA

Y$43,0

78

$10,4

25

3,0

93 G

J$53,5

03

49.0

t14.8

t

34.2

t

673,3

08

kW

h

669

GJ

2,4

24

GJ

669

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

Ice

Are

nas

Sub

tota

l9,1

44 G

J$150,4

84

168.1

t$112,7

29

1,8

47,9

52

kW

hE

lectr

icity

6,6

53

GJ

40.7

t

$37,7

55

2,4

91

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

2,4

91

GJ

127.4

t

Ind

oor P

ools

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA A

QU

ATI

C F

AC

ILIT

Y - 9

51 G

IBSO

NS W

AY

$13,8

13

$48,0

27

4,1

35 G

J$61,8

40

184.0

t3.7

t

180.2

t

169,6

84

kW

h

3,5

24

GJ

611

GJ

3,5

24

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

P EN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

AQ

UA

TIC &

FIT

NES

S CEN

TRE -

136

39 S

UN

SHIN

E CO

AST

HW

Y$32,4

41

1,9

90 G

J$32,4

41

12.2

t12.2

t552,6

61

kW

h1,9

90

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SEC

HEL

T AQ

UA

TIC C

ENTR

E - 5

500

SHO

RNC

LIFF

E AVE

NU

E$67,7

90

$166,8

00

16,8

29 G

J$234,5

90

664.6

t26.6

t

638.0

t

1,2

10,1

81

kW

h

12,4

73

GJ

4,3

57

GJ

12,4

73

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 2

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

41

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Indo

or P

ools

Sub

tota

l22,9

53 G

J$328,8

70

860.7

t$114,0

44

1,9

32,5

26

kW

hE

lectr

icity

6,9

57

GJ

42.5

t

$214,8

27

15,9

96

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

15,9

96

GJ

818.2

t

Mis

c.

KATH

ERIN

E LA

KE C

AM

PGRO

UN

D -

GA

RDEN

BA

Y RD

$2,5

82

109 G

J$2,5

82

0.7

t0.7

t30,1

90

kW

h109

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

PEN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

LAN

DFI

LL O

FFIC

E AN

D S

CA

LE -

5545

GA

RDEN

BA

Y RD

A$507

20 G

J$507

0.1

t0.1

t5,5

16

kW

h20

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

PEN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

LAN

DFI

LL S

HA

RE S

HED

- 55

45 G

ARD

EN B

AY

RD B

$244

8 G

J$244

0.0

t0.0

t2,2

33

kW

h8

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

ROBE

RTS C

REEK

PIE

R PA

RK -

1012

RO

BERT

S CRE

EK R

D$71

0 G

J$71

0.0

t0.0

t29

kW

h0

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SEC

HEL

T LA

ND

FILL

- 49

01 D

UST

Y RO

AD

117 G

J$3,6

87

7.1

t$3,6

87

7.1

t4,6

09

litre

s117

GJ

Pro

pane

Mis

c. S

ubto

tal

253 G

J$7,0

91

7.9

t$3,4

04

37,9

68

kW

hE

lectr

icity

137

GJ

0.8

t

Pro

pane

4,6

09

litre

s117

$3,6

87

GJ

7.1

t

Park

s &

Pla

yin

g F

ield

s

PEN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

SPO

RTSF

IELD

- 13

776

SUN

CST

HW

Y FL

D$158

6 G

J$158

0.0

t0.0

t1,7

13

kW

h6

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Park

s &

Pla

ying

Fie

lds

Sub

tota

l6 G

J$158

0.0

t$158

1,7

13

kW

hE

lectr

icity

6G

J0.0

t

Pub

lic W

orks

Bld

gs

& Y

ard

s

PARK

S HU

T - 5

920

MA

SON

RD

$592

$3,8

55

222 G

J$4,4

47

10.3

t0.1

t

10.1

t

6,5

83

kW

h

198

GJ

24

GJ

198

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

P UBL

IC W

ORK

S - 5

920

MA

SON

RD

$628

25 G

J$628

0.2

t0.2

t7,0

33

kW

h25

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

TRA

NSI

T BU

ILD

ING

AN

D W

ORK

S YA

RD -

5920

MA

SON

RD

$14,1

35

$9,8

10

1,1

59 G

J$23,9

45

31.1

t3.8

t

27.2

t

173,9

51

kW

h

532

GJ

626

GJ

532

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

Pub

lic W

orks

Bld

gs &

Yar

ds S

ubto

tal

1,4

06 G

J$29,0

20

41.5

t$15,3

55

187,5

66

kW

hE

lectr

icity

675

GJ

4.1

t

$13,6

65

731

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

731

GJ

37.4

t

Rad

io T

ran

smit

ter/

Rep

eate

r/Re

ceiv

er

RAD

IO R

ELA

Y ST

ATI

ON

- W

ESTW

OO

D R

D$728

30 G

J$728

0.2

t0.2

t8,2

76

kW

h30

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

RAD

IO R

ELA

Y ST

ATI

ON

9-1

-1 -

6400

APP

LEC

ROSS

RD

$114

2 G

J$114

0.0

t0.0

t649

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 3

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

42

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Radi

o Tr

ansm

itter

/Rep

eate

r/Re

ceiv

er S

ubto

tal

32 G

J$842

0.2

t$842

8,9

25

kW

hE

lectr

icity

32

GJ

0.2

t

Stor

age

Faci

lity

STO

RAG

E - B

ROW

NIN

G R

D$15

0 G

J$15

0.0

t0.0

t52

kW

h0

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Stor

age

Faci

lity

Sub

tota

l0 G

J$15

0.0

t$15

52

kW

hE

lectr

icity

0G

J0.0

t

Consum

ption

CO

e 2C

osts

Energ

y

9,2

38

36,9

51 G

J$581,5

68

1,1

23.3

t

$299,4

66

4,7

51,5

66

kW

hE

lectr

icity

17,1

06

GJ

104.5

t

$272,8

11

19,5

50

GJ

Natu

ral

Gas

19,5

50

GJ

1,0

00.0

t

$1,9

01

1,5

84

litre

s61

GJ

4.5

tF

uelO

il Pro

pane

litre

s234

$7,3

90

GJ

14.2

tS

tnry

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

LIG

HTI

NG

Doc

k Li

gh

t

HA

LFM

OO

N B

AY

PORT

- M

INTI

E RD

$129

3 G

J$129

0.0

t0.0

t837

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

HO

PKIN

S LA

ND

ING

PO

RT -

BURN

S RD

$178

5 G

J$178

0.0

t0.0

t1,4

32

kW

h5

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

KEA

TS R

OA

D -

KEA

TS C

AM

P W

HA

RF$309

11 G

J$309

0.1

t0.1

t3,0

38

kW

h11

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Doc

k Li

ght S

ubto

tal

19 G

J$616

0.1

t$616

5,3

07

kW

hE

lectr

icity

19

GJ

0.1

t

Ove

rhea

d L

igh

tin

g

AU

STIN

RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G -

AU

STIN

RD

$141

3 G

J$141

0.0

t0.0

t697

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

BURN

S RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G -

BURN

S RD

$150

1 G

J$150

0.0

t0.0

t398

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

FIRC

REST

RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G -

FIRC

REST

RD

$301

3 G

J$301

0.0

t0.0

t802

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GA

MBI

ER S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

- G

AM

BIER

RD

$141

3 G

J$141

0.0

t0.0

t697

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GRA

NTH

AM

S LA

ND

ING

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G -

GRA

NTH

AM

S LA

ND

ING

$1,5

03

14 G

J$1,5

03

0.1

t0.1

t4,0

10

kW

h14

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

HYD

AW

AY

ROA

D S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

- H

YDA

WA

Y RD

$150

1 G

J$150

0.0

t0.0

t398

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 4

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

43

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

LAN

GD

ALE

STR

EET L

IGH

TIN

G -

$1,5

03

14 G

J$1,5

03

0.1

t0.1

t4,0

10

kW

h14

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

LAN

GD

ALE

STR

EET S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

- F

$5,1

99

61 G

J$5,1

99

0.4

t0.4

t16,8

42

kW

h61

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

PRA

TT R

OA

D S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

- PR

ATT

RD

$3,4

09

39 G

J$3,4

09

0.2

t0.2

t10,8

24

kW

h39

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SEC

HEL

T [A

] STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G -

A$5,1

20

56 G

J$5,1

20

0.3

t0.3

t15,6

36

kW

h56

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SEC

HEL

T [B]

STR

EET L

IGH

TIN

G -

B$3,6

17

42 G

J$3,6

17

0.3

t0.3

t11,6

26

kW

h42

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SPRU

CE R

OA

D S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

- SP

RUC

E RD

$150

1 G

J$150

0.0

t0.0

t398

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

STEW

ART

RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G -

STEW

ART

RD

$301

3 G

J$301

0.0

t0.0

t802

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SUN

NYS

IDE A

REA S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

- SU

NN

YSID

E RD

$601

6 G

J$601

0.0

t0.0

t1,6

04

kW

h6

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

VETE

RAN

S RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G -

VETE

RAN

S RD

$301

3 G

J$301

0.0

t0.0

t802

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

WO

OD

CRE

EK P

ARK

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G -

WO

OD

CRE

EK$1,4

68

16 G

J$1,4

68

0.1

t0.1

t4,4

08

kW

h16

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Ove

rhea

d Li

ghtin

g Su

bto

tal

266 G

J$24,0

55

1.6

t$24,0

55

73,9

53

kW

hE

lectr

icity

266

GJ

1.6

t

Park

ing

Lot

Lig

hti

ng

(op

en)

AD

MIN

ISTR

ATI

ON

BU

ILD

ING

- D

$4,3

03

51 G

J$4,3

03

0.3

t0.3

t14,1

83

kW

h51

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA A

QU

ATI

C F

AC

ILIT

Y - 9

51 G

IBSO

NS W

AY

$1,7

41

75 G

J$1,7

41

0.5

t0.5

t20,7

02

kW

h75

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SHIR

LEY

MA

CEY

PA

RK -

944

CH

AM

BERL

IN R

D$170

5 G

J$170

0.0

t0.0

t1,3

38

kW

h5

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SUN

SHIN

E CO

AST

ARE

NA -

598

6 SH

OA

L WA

Y$7,0

56

313 G

J$7,0

56

1.9

t1.9

t87,0

40

kW

h313

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Park

ing

Lot L

ight

ing

(op

en) S

ubto

tal

444 G

J$13,2

70

2.7

t$13,2

70

123,2

63

kW

hE

lectr

icity

444

GJ

2.7

t

Park

s &

Pla

yin

g F

ield

s

CLI

FF G

ILKE

R PA

RK -

SUN

CST

HW

Y$6,0

69

268 G

J$6,0

69

1.6

t1.6

t

Inclu

des c

are

taker

build

ing a

nd w

ashro

om

s

74,5

30

kW

h268

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Park

s &

Pla

ying

Fie

lds

Sub

tota

l268 G

J$6,0

69

1.6

t$6,0

69

74,5

30

kW

hE

lectr

icity

268

GJ

1.6

t

Pole

Lig

ht

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 5

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

44

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

CLI

FF G

ILKE

R PA

RK -

SUN

CST

HW

Y$537

21 G

J$537

0.1

t0.1

t5,9

27

kW

h21

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

CO

NN

OR

PARK

- N

ORT

HW

OO

D R

D$105

2 G

J$105

0.0

t0.0

t430

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

CO

OPE

R’S G

REEN

PA

RK -

RED

ROO

FFS R

D$576

29 G

J$576

0.2

t0.2

t7,9

74

kW

h29

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

DA

N B

OSC

H P

ARK

- 15

555

SUN

CST

HW

Y$78

2 G

J$78

0.0

t0.0

t455

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

FRA

NK

WES

T HA

LL A

ND

FIR

E HA

LL -

1224

CH

AST

ER R

D L

GT

$93

2 G

J$93

0.0

t0.0

t435

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

HIL

LSID

E IN

D P

ARK

- PO

RT M

ELLO

N H

WY

$68

$68

0.0

t

KATH

ERIN

E LA

KE C

AM

PGRO

UN

D -

GA

RDEN

BA

Y RD

$804

32 G

J$804

0.2

t0.2

t9,0

26

kW

h32

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

KEA

TS R

OA

D -

KEA

TS R

D-8

530

POLE

18

$243

6 G

J$243

0.0

t0.0

t1,6

01

kW

h6

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Pole

Lig

ht S

ubto

tal

93 G

J$2,5

05

0.6

t$2,5

05

25,8

48

kW

hE

lectr

icity

93

GJ

0.6

t

Consum

ption

CO

e 2C

osts

Energ

y1,0

90 G

J$46,5

15

6.7

t

$46,5

15

302,9

01

kW

hE

lectr

icity

1,0

90

GJ

6.7

t

Ligh

ting

Sub

tota

l

WA

TER

& W

AST

EWA

TER

Boo

ster

Pum

p S

tati

on

CH

APM

AN

CRE

EK P

UM

P ST

ATI

ON

- 56

42 R

ESER

VOIR

RD

A$15,4

56

731 G

J$15,4

56

4.5

t4.5

t203,1

00

kW

h731

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Boos

ter P

ump

Sta

tion

Sub

tota

l731 G

J$15,4

56

4.5

t$15,4

56

203,1

00

kW

hE

lectr

icity

731

GJ

4.5

t

Ch

lori

nat

ion

Sta

tion

GRA

Y C

REEK

CH

LORI

NA

TIO

N S

TATI

ON

- G

RAY

CRE

EK$152

4 G

J$152

0.0

t0.0

t1,0

99

kW

h4

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Chl

orin

atio

n St

atio

n Su

bto

tal

4 G

J$152

0.0

t$152

1,0

99

kW

hE

lectr

icity

4G

J0.0

t

Liq

uid

Was

te L

ift S

tati

on

TRU

MA

N R

OA

D L

IFT S

TATI

ON

- 92

33 T

RUM

AN

RD

FRT

$141

4 G

J$141

0.0

t0.0

t981

kW

h4

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Liqu

id W

aste

Lift

Sta

tion

Sub

tota

l4 G

J$141

0.0

t$141

981

kW

hE

lectr

icity

4G

J0.0

t

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 6

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

45

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Liq

uid

Was

te T

reat

men

t Pla

nt

CU

RRA

N R

OA

D S

EWA

GE T

REA

TMEN

T PLA

NT -

552

1 C

URR

AN

RD

$1,0

71

45 G

J$1,0

71

0.3

t0.3

t12,4

39

kW

h45

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

EMER

Y RO

AD

TRE

ATM

ENT P

LAN

T - 1

131

EMER

Y RD

PU

MP

$4,0

98

179 G

J$4,0

98

1.1

t1.1

t49,7

83

kW

h179

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

JOLL

Y RO

GER

TRE

ATM

ENT P

LAN

T -$2,3

36

101 G

J$2,3

36

0.6

t0.6

t28,0

48

kW

h101

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

LAN

GD

ALE

TRE

ATM

ENT P

LAN

T - J

AN

SEN

RD

$496

19 G

J$496

0.1

t0.1

t5,4

00

kW

h19

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

LEE B

AY

TREA

TMEN

T PLA

NT -

433

6 O

RCA R

D$1,4

31

61 G

J$1,4

31

0.4

t0.4

t16,8

75

kW

h61

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

LILY

LA

KE T

REA

TMEN

T PLA

NT -

127

10 L

AG

OO

N R

D$2,4

70

107 G

J$2,4

70

0.7

t0.7

t29,6

23

kW

h107

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

MER

RILL

CRE

S TRE

ATM

ENT P

LAN

T - M

ERRI

LL R

D$1,2

17

51 G

J$1,2

17

0.3

t0.3

t14,2

35

kW

h51

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SEC

RET C

OVE

MA

RIN

A T

REA

TMEN

T PLA

NT -

547

1 SE

CRE

T CO

VE R

D$2,2

89

99 G

J$2,2

89

0.6

t0.6

t27,4

49

kW

h99

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SQU

ARE

BA

Y TR

EATM

ENT P

LAN

T - 5

320

SUSA

N W

AY

$1,3

96

59 G

J$1,3

96

0.4

t0.4

t16,4

56

kW

h59

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

WO

OD

CRE

EK T

REA

TMEN

T PLA

NT -

OC

EAN

VIEW

DR

$1,8

01

77 G

J$1,8

01

0.5

t0.5

t21,4

86

kW

h77

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Liqu

id W

aste

Tre

atm

ent P

lant

Sub

tota

l798 G

J$18,6

06

4.9

t$18,6

06

221,7

95

kW

hE

lectr

icity

798

GJ

4.9

t

Mis

c.

MET

ERIN

G C

HA

MBE

R - 1

103

SUN

CST

HW

Y$63

$63

0.0

t

Mis

c. S

ubto

tal

$63

0.0

t$63

Pota

ble

Wat

er D

eep

Wel

l

CH

AST

ER R

OA

D W

ELL -

CH

AST

ER R

OA

D P

UM

P ST

ATI

ON

$10,7

83

545 G

J$10,7

83

3.3

t3.3

t151,3

82

kW

h545

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

EAST

BOU

RNE W

ELL A

ND

WA

TER

TREA

TMEN

T FA

CIL

ITY

- GA

VIN

RD

$1,0

45

44 G

J$1,0

45

0.3

t0.3

t12,1

00

kW

h44

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GO

RDO

N W

ELL -

KEA

TS IS

LAN

D -

OA

K A

VE$154

4 G

J$154

0.0

t0.0

t1,1

16

kW

h4

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

KATH

ERIN

E LA

KE P

OTA

BLE W

ELL -

GA

RDEN

BA

Y RD

$256

9 G

J$256

0.1

t0.1

t2,3

90

kW

h9

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

LAN

GD

ALE

WEL

L - P

ORT

MEL

LON

HW

Y$12,3

03

488 G

J$12,3

03

3.0

t3.0

t135,4

80

kW

h488

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SOA

MES

WEL

L - P

ORT

MEL

LON

HW

Y$2,1

29

92 G

J$2,1

29

0.6

t0.6

t25,4

40

kW

h92

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 7

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

46

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Pota

ble

Wat

er D

eep

Wel

l Sub

tota

l1,1

80 G

J$26,6

69

7.2

t$26,6

69

327,9

08

kW

hE

lectr

icity

1,1

80

GJ

7.2

t

Pota

ble

Wat

er P

ump

Sta

tion

CA

LETA

PU

MP

STA

TIO

N -

SUN

CST

HW

Y$108

2 G

J$108

0.0

t0.0

t540

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

CO

VE C

AY

PUM

P ST

ATI

ON

- SU

N C

ST H

WY

$1,5

68

67 G

J$1,5

68

0.4

t0.4

t18,6

85

kW

h67

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GA

RDEN

BA

Y W

ATE

RWO

RKS D

IST -

GA

RDEN

BA

Y RD

$11,4

82

476 G

J$11,4

82

2.9

t2.9

t132,1

16

kW

h476

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GRA

NTH

AM

S LA

ND

ING

PU

MP

STA

TIO

N -

MA

RIN

E DR

$1,3

57

58 G

J$1,3

57

0.4

t0.4

t15,9

91

kW

h58

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

HO

TEL L

AKE

PU

MP

STA

TIO

N -

IRVI

NES

LD

G R

D$914

39 G

J$914

0.2

t0.2

t10,8

26

kW

h39

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

MT.

RIC

HA

RDSO

N P

UM

P ST

ATI

ON

- 68

96 M

T RIC

HA

RDSO

N R

D$541

22 G

J$541

0.1

t0.1

t5,9

94

kW

h22

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

ORC

A R

OA

D P

UM

P ST

ATI

ON

- 42

95 O

RCA R

D$1,2

61

53 G

J$1,2

61

0.3

t0.3

t14,8

12

kW

h53

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

PAYN

E RD

PU

MP

STA

TIO

N -

1056

REE

D R

D$7,8

08

342 G

J$7,8

08

2.1

t2.1

t95,0

08

kW

h342

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

PAYN

E RD

PU

MP

STA

TIO

N -

1056

REE

D R

D$3,2

38

141 G

J$3,2

38

0.9

t0.9

t39,1

10

kW

h141

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

ROBE

RTS C

REEK

PU

MP

STA

TIO

N -

SUN

CST

HW

Y$4,4

40

176 G

J$4,4

40

1.1

t1.1

t48,8

09

kW

h176

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SAN

DY

HO

OK

PUM

P ST

ATI

ON

- SE

CH

ELT I

NLE

T RD

$8,0

38

354 G

J$8,0

38

2.2

t2.2

t98,3

92

kW

h354

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SELM

A P

UM

P ST

ATI

ON

- PA

TTER

SON

RD

$5,4

99

200 G

J$5,4

99

1.2

t1.2

t55,5

87

kW

h200

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

SELM

A P

UM

P ST

ATI

ON

- PA

TTER

SON

RD

$1,3

24

59 G

J$1,3

24

0.4

t0.4

t16,4

91

kW

h59

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Pota

ble

Wat

er P

ump

Sta

tion

Sub

tota

l1,9

89 G

J$47,5

77

12.2

t$47,5

77

552,3

62

kW

hE

lectr

icity

1,9

89

GJ

12.2

t

Pota

ble

Wat

er R

eser

voir

LEE R

OA

D R

ESER

VOIR

- LE

E RO

AD

WA

TER

TOW

ER$86

1 G

J$86

0.0

t0.0

t196

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

REED

RO

AD

RES

ERVO

IR -

1044

REE

D R

D$66

0 G

J$66

0.0

t0.0

t32

kW

h0

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

TRO

UT L

AKE

RES

ERVO

IR -

TRO

UT L

AKE

RES

ERVO

IR$77

1 G

J$77

0.0

t0.0

t142

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

WA

TER

TOW

ER K

EITH

RD

- C

EMET

ERY

RD$103

2 G

J$103

0.0

t0.0

t423

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

Pota

ble

Wat

er R

eser

voir

Sub

tota

l3 G

J$331

0.0

t$331

793

kW

hE

lectr

icity

3G

J0.0

t

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 8

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

47

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Pota

ble

Wat

er T

reat

men

t

CH

APM

AN

CRE

EK W

ATE

R TR

EATM

ENT P

LAN

T - B

-564

2 RE

SERV

OIR

RD

$40,0

47

$12,2

59

3,2

83 G

J$52,3

06

51.6

t15.8

t

35.8

t

717,3

71

kW

h

700

GJ

2,5

83

GJ

700

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

Pota

ble

Wat

er T

reat

men

t Sub

tota

l3,2

83 G

J$52,3

06

51.6

t$40,0

47

717,3

71

kW

hE

lectr

icity

2,5

83

GJ

15.8

t

$12,2

59

700

GJ

Natu

ralG

as

700

GJ

35.8

t

Rech

lori

nat

ion

Sta

tion

REC

HLO

RIN

ATI

ON

STA

TIO

N -

SUN

CST

HW

Y$1,3

88

59 G

J$1,3

88

0.4

t0.4

t16,4

69

kW

h59

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

RED

ROO

FFS R

OA

D S

TATI

ON

- RE

DRO

OFF

S RD

$65

$65

0.0

t

Rech

lorin

atio

n St

atio

n Su

bto

tal

59 G

J$1,4

53

0.4

t$1,4

53

16,4

69

kW

hE

lectr

icity

59

GJ

0.4

t

Consum

ption

CO

e 2C

osts

Energ

y8,0

51 G

J$162,7

54

80.7

t

$150,4

95

2,0

41,8

77

kW

hE

lectr

icity

7,3

51

GJ

44.9

t

$12,2

59

700

GJ

Natu

ral

Gas

700

GJ

35.8

t

Wat

er &

Was

tew

ater

Sub

tota

l

VEH

ICLE

FLE

ET

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s

1996

INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L 2W

HD

R - 3

99$1,0

42

35 G

J$1,0

42

2.5

t2.5

t907

litre

s35

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

1999

4W

HD

R FO

RD F

550

- 382

$554

18 G

J$554

1.3

t1.3

t458

litre

s18

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2000

F35

0 F O

RD F

LATD

ECK

- 352

$2,2

60

73 G

J$2,2

60

5.3

t5.3

t1,8

92

litre

s73

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2005

GM

C 2

WH

DR

(RED

) - 4

00$653

21 G

J$653

1.5

t1.5

t537

litre

s21

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2006

I NTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L REC

YCLI

NG

- 40

9$28,6

86

927 G

J$28,6

86

66.6

t66.6

t23,9

68

litre

s927

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2007

F35

0 4 X

2 W

/ REA

DIN

G S

ERVI

CE B

OD

Y - 4

16$3,4

26

109 G

J$3,4

26

7.8

t7.8

t2,8

24

litre

s109

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2007

F35

0 4 X

4 EX

TEN

DED

CA

B W

/ ITB

FLA

T DEC

K - 4

15$4,0

49

131 G

J$4,0

49

9.4

t9.4

t3,3

97

litre

s131

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2008

F45

0 S U

PERD

UTY

- 42

6$4,9

64

160 G

J$4,9

64

11.5

t11.5

t4,1

29

litre

s160

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 9

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

48

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

2008

FO

RD F

350

4X4

SUPE

R C

AB

- 439

$1,9

26

62 G

J$1,9

26

4.4

t4.4

t1,5

99

litre

s62

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

94 F

ORD

F70

0 4T

ON

- 31

6$814

27 G

J$814

2.0

t2.0

t707

litre

s27

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

95 I N

TL. 5

-TO

N D

UM

P - 3

32$3,9

17

129 G

J$3,9

17

9.3

t9.3

t3,3

35

litre

s129

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

99 F

ORD

F35

0 - 3

18$3,0

46

99 G

J$3,0

46

7.1

t7.1

t2,5

52

litre

s99

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

R ESC

UE T

RUC

K - 4

00$400

17 G

J$400

1.2

t1.2

t431

litre

s17

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s Su

bto

tal

1,8

08 G

J$55,7

38

129.9

tD

iesel

Fuel

$55,7

38

46,7

36

litre

s1,8

08

GJ

129.9

t

Die

sel F

uel O

ff R

oad

Veh

icle

s &

Eq

uip

men

t

1987

GA

TOR

JOH

N D

EERE

- 33

9$139

4 G

J$139

0.3

t0.3

t102

litre

s4

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2005

PIS

TEN

BU

LLY

PB10

0 - 4

10$2,9

30

111 G

J$2,9

30

8.0

t8.0

t2,8

77

litre

s111

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

J OH

N D

EERE

BA

CKH

OE -

404

$8,4

19

279 G

J$8,4

19

20.0

t20.0

t7,2

11

litre

s279

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

TRA

CTO

R - 4

01$815

24 G

J$815

1.7

t1.7

t629

litre

s24

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

Die

sel F

uel O

ff R

oad

Vehi

cles

& E

quip

men

t Sub

tota

l418 G

J$12,3

03

30.1

tD

iesel

Fuel

$12,3

03

10,8

19

litre

s418

GJ

30.1

t

Fire

Ser

vice

s

1981

INTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L 2 W

HD

R. F

IRE T

RUC

K (Y

ELLO

W) -

405

$94

3 G

J$94

0.2

t0.2

t94

litre

s3

GJ

Gaso

line

1985

2 W

HD

R RE

D G

MC -

368

$856

25 G

J$856

1.8

t1.8

t716

litre

s25

GJ

Gaso

line

1997

FO

RD E

XPL

R 4

DRS

W -

395

$1,1

26

38 G

J$1,1

26

2.8

t2.8

t1,1

03

litre

s38

GJ

Gaso

line

1998

PU

MPE

R FR

EIG

HTL

INER

- 36

7$375

12 G

J$375

0.9

t0.9

t318

litre

s12

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

E GM

ON

T VO

LUN

TEER

FIR

E DEP

ART

MEN

T -$766

22 G

J$766

1.6

t1.6

t638

litre

s22

GJ

Gaso

line

GIB

SON

S VO

LUN

TEER

FIR

E DEP

ART

MEN

T -$4,5

51

$4,2

29

257 G

J$8,7

80

18.5

t9.5

t

9.0

t

3,7

92

litre

s

3,2

53

litre

s

131

GJ

126

GJ

Gaso

line

Die

sel

Fuel

R OBE

RTS C

REEK

FIR

E HA

LL -

$1,2

10

35 G

J$1,2

10

2.5

t2.5

t1,0

08

litre

s35

GJ

Gaso

line

S EA

RCH

AN

D R

ESC

UE -

$458

$138

18 G

J$596

1.3

t1.0

t

0.3

t

381

litre

s

116

litre

s

13

GJ

4G

JG

aso

line

Die

sel

Fuel

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

020

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

49

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Fire

Ser

vice

s Su

bto

tal

411 G

J$13,8

04

29.6

tG

aso

line

$9,0

61

7,7

33

litre

s268

GJ

19.3

t

Die

sel

Fuel

$4,7

43

3,6

87

litre

s143

GJ

10.2

t

Gas

olin

e M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s &

Van

s

2004

FO

RD F

350

- 397

$9,6

48

292 G

J$9,6

48

21.0

t21.0

t8,4

17

litre

s292

GJ

Gaso

line

2007

FO

RD 5

50 R

ESC

UE T

RUC

K - 4

21$240

7 G

J$240

0.5

t0.5

t205

litre

s7

GJ

Gaso

line

2008

F35

0 4 X

4 W

ITH

SER

VIC

E BO

DY

- 436

$225

7 G

J$225

0.5

t0.5

t197

litre

s7

GJ

Gaso

line

F350

SBO

DY

- 357

$9,9

33

296 G

J$9,9

33

21.3

t21.3

t8,5

39

litre

s296

GJ

Gaso

line

Gas

olin

e M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s &

Van

s Su

bto

tal

602 G

J$20,0

47

43.3

tG

aso

line

$20,0

47

17,3

58

litre

s602

GJ

43.3

t

Gas

olin

e O

ff R

oad

Veh

icle

s &

Eq

uip

men

t

2005

JO

HN

DEE

RE T

RAIL

BUC

K A

TV -

402

$17

0 G

J$17

0.0

t0.0

t12

litre

s0

GJ

Gaso

line

2006

SKA

ND

IC S

WT 5

50F S

KID

OO

- 41

7$393

14 G

J$393

1.0

t1.0

t396

litre

s14

GJ

Gaso

line

MO

WER

- 36

0$319

9 G

J$319

0.6

t0.6

t259

litre

s9

GJ

Gaso

line

Gas

olin

e O

ff R

oad

Vehi

cles

& E

quip

men

t Sub

tota

l23 G

J$728

1.7

tG

aso

line

$728

667

litre

s23

GJ

1.7

t

Gas

olin

e Pa

ssen

ger

Car

s

2000

SU

ZUKI

VIT

RA -

353

$2,8

14

86 G

J$2,8

14

6.2

t6.2

t2,4

75

litre

s86

GJ

Gaso

line

2002

FO

RD R

AN

GER

- 36

1$4,5

45

136 G

J$4,5

45

9.8

t9.8

t3,9

26

litre

s136

GJ

Gaso

line

2003

GEO

TRA

CKE

R - 3

86$869

26 G

J$869

1.8

t1.8

t739

litre

s26

GJ

Gaso

line

2003

GEO

TRA

CKE

R - 3

87$1,5

59

47 G

J$1,5

59

3.4

t3.4

t1,3

59

litre

s47

GJ

Gaso

line

2003

GEO

TRA

CKE

R - 3

88$1,7

96

54 G

J$1,7

96

3.9

t3.9

t1,5

71

litre

s54

GJ

Gaso

line

2004

CH

EV T

RCKR

4D

RHT -

396

$3,2

06

98 G

J$3,2

06

7.0

t7.0

t2,8

22

litre

s98

GJ

Gaso

line

92 T

RAC

KER

- 315

$858

26 G

J$858

1.9

t1.9

t756

litre

s26

GJ

Gaso

line

95 G

EO T

RAC

KER

- 333

$414

12 G

J$414

0.9

t0.9

t352

litre

s12

GJ

Gaso

line

Gas

olin

e Pa

ssen

ger C

ars

Sub

tota

l485 G

J$16,0

61

35.0

tG

aso

line

$16,0

61

14,0

00

litre

s485

GJ

35.0

t

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

120

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

50

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Gen

erat

or S

tati

on

FIEL

D R

OA

D G

ENER

ATO

R -

$605

18 G

J$605

1.3

t1.3

t465

litre

s18

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

NO

RTH

PEN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

WA

TER

SYST

EM -

$98

3 G

J$98

0.2

t0.2

t81

litre

s3

GJ

Gaso

line

NO

RTH

PEN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

WA

TER

SYST

EM A

ND

GEN

ERA

TOR

-$5,3

12

158 G

J$5,3

12

11.4

t11.4

t

Inclu

des a

n u

ndis

clo

sed v

olu

me o

f fu

el fo

r a v

ehic

le

4,0

86

litre

s158

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

S ELM

A S

IMPS

ON

MA

XW

ELL G

ENSE

T -$122

3 G

J$122

0.2

t0.2

t89

litre

s3

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

S OU

TH P

END

ER H

ARB

OU

R W

ATE

R W

ORK

S -$2,6

25

$4,0

36

190 G

J$6,6

61

13.7

t5.5

t

8.2

t

Inclu

des a

n u

ndis

clo

sed v

olu

me o

f fu

el fo

r a v

ehic

le

2,2

06

litre

s

2,9

46

litre

s

76

GJ

114

GJ

Gaso

line

Die

sel

Fuel

WA

TER

TREA

TMEN

T PLA

NT G

ENER

ATO

R -

$1,4

22

42 G

J$1,4

22

3.0

t3.0

t1,0

94

litre

s42

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

Gen

erat

or S

tatio

n Su

bto

tal

415 G

J$14,2

20

29.8

tG

aso

line

$2,7

23

2,2

87

litre

s79

GJ

5.7

t

Die

sel

Fuel

$11,4

97

8,6

80

litre

s336

GJ

24.1

t

Lig

ht T

ruck

s, V

ans,

an

d S

UV

s

1979

CH

EVY

VAN

- 37

4$577

16 G

J$577

1.2

t1.2

t467

litre

s16

GJ

Gaso

line

1985

WH

DR

RED

GM

C -

368

$796

27 G

J$796

1.9

t1.9

t779

litre

s27

GJ

Gaso

line

1986

2W

HD

R RE

D G

MC -

365

$438

12 G

J$438

0.9

t0.9

t341

litre

s12

GJ

Gaso

line

1995

CH

EV S

-10

- 330

$68

3 G

J$68

0.2

t0.2

t73

litre

s3

GJ

Gaso

line

1996

FO

RD A

ERO

STA

R - 3

36$692

20 G

J$692

1.5

t1.5

t589

litre

s20

GJ

Gaso

line

1997

CH

EVRO

LET V

AN

2D

RSW

- 42

9$189

5 G

J$189

0.4

t0.4

t144

litre

s5

GJ

Gaso

line

1997

FO

RD E

XPL

OR

4DRS

W (R

ED) -

395

$1,2

47

38 G

J$1,2

47

2.7

t2.7

t1,0

86

litre

s38

GJ

Gaso

line

2000

F25

0 F O

RD -

354

$3,1

46

93 G

J$3,1

46

6.7

t6.7

t2,6

73

litre

s93

GJ

Gaso

line

2000

FO

RD F

250

- 354

$3,5

27

120 G

J$3,5

27

8.6

t8.6

t3,4

53

litre

s120

GJ

Gaso

line

2000

FO

RD R

AN

GER

- 35

1$2,1

98

65 G

J$2,1

98

4.7

t4.7

t1,8

86

litre

s65

GJ

Gaso

line

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

220

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

51

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

2001

FO

RD W

DST

R - 3

55$1,0

27

30 G

J$1,0

27

2.2

t2.2

t872

litre

s30

GJ

Gaso

line

2002

F15

0 4 X

2 FO

RD -

364

$2,3

96

73 G

J$2,3

96

5.2

t5.2

t2,1

00

litre

s73

GJ

Gaso

line

2003

CH

EV V

ENTU

RE V

AN

- 38

5$1,1

76

36 G

J$1,1

76

2.6

t2.6

t1,0

39

litre

s36

GJ

Gaso

line

2003

FO

RD F

250

P/U

- 36

3$2,2

61

67 G

J$2,2

61

4.8

t4.8

t1,9

34

litre

s67

GJ

Gaso

line

2004

CH

EVRO

LET S

ILVR

. P/U

P - 4

11$3,7

71

114 G

J$3,7

71

8.2

t8.2

t3,3

01

litre

s114

GJ

Gaso

line

2004

FO

RD F

250

REG

CA

B 2W

D -

394

$2,4

86

77 G

J$2,4

86

5.5

t5.5

t2,2

14

litre

s77

GJ

Gaso

line

2005

CH

EVRO

LET C

OLO

RAD

O (W

HIT

E) -

406

$1,9

47

59 G

J$1,9

47

4.2

t4.2

t1,6

94

litre

s59

GJ

Gaso

line

2005

CH

EVRO

LET C

OLO

RAD

O (W

HIT

E) -

407

$2,5

61

78 G

J$2,5

61

5.6

t5.6

t2,2

61

litre

s78

GJ

Gaso

line

2005

CH

EVRO

LET S

ILVR

PIC

K-U

P - 4

08$1,4

27

44 G

J$1,4

27

3.2

t3.2

t1,2

81

litre

s44

GJ

Gaso

line

2007

FO

RD R

AN

GER

FLA

T DEC

K - 4

13$3,0

25

89 G

J$3,0

25

6.4

t6.4

t2,5

76

litre

s89

GJ

Gaso

line

2007

FO

RD R

AN

GER

FLA

TDEC

K - 4

13$3,1

09

105 G

J$3,1

09

7.6

t7.6

t3,0

43

litre

s105

GJ

Gaso

line

2008

FO

RD R

AN

GER

P/P

- 43

0$583

17 G

J$583

1.2

t1.2

t500

litre

s17

GJ

Gaso

line

2008

FO

RD R

AN

GER

P/U

P W

/ SER

VIC

E BO

DY

- 434

$1,8

82

56 G

J$1,8

82

4.1

t4.1

t1,6

22

litre

s56

GJ

Gaso

line

2008

FO

RD R

AN

GER

P/U

P W

/ SER

VIC

E BO

DY

- 435

$1,9

93

61 G

J$1,9

93

4.4

t4.4

t1,7

51

litre

s61

GJ

Gaso

line

2008

FO

RD R

AN

GER

W/ C

AN

OPY

- 44

1$181

5 G

J$181

0.4

t0.4

t154

litre

s5

GJ

Gaso

line

2008

FO

RDF2

50 S

UPE

R C

AB

- 433

$1,4

48

42 G

J$1,4

48

3.0

t3.0

t

Costs

split

betw

een four

facili

ties1,2

12

litre

s42

GJ

Gaso

line

95 F

ORD

RA

NG

ER -

331

$689

21 G

J$689

1.5

t1.5

t619

litre

s21

GJ

Gaso

line

97 F

ORD

3/4

TO

N -

337

$692

23 G

J$692

1.6

t1.6

t589

litre

s23

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

CH

EV S

ILVE

RAD

O 2

DR.

- 1

$2,8

03

80 G

J$2,8

03

5.8

t5.8

t2,3

10

litre

s80

GJ

Gaso

line

E150

2D

R P/

U -

356

$2,6

20

77 G

J$2,6

20

5.5

t5.5

t2,2

12

litre

s77

GJ

Gaso

line

E250

VA

N -

358

$2,4

63

72 G

J$2,4

63

5.2

t5.2

t2,0

73

litre

s72

GJ

Gaso

line

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

320

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

52

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

F250

- 43

8$257

9 G

J$257

0.6

t0.6

t253

litre

s9

GJ

Gaso

line

F ORD

ESC

APE

- 43

7$340

10 G

J$340

0.7

t0.7

t290

litre

s10

GJ

Gaso

line

F ORD

ESC

APE

- 44

0$1,1

91

35 G

J$1,1

91

2.5

t2.5

t1,0

20

litre

s35

GJ

Gaso

line

R AN

GER

4X4

2003

- 38

9$2,9

64

89 G

J$2,9

64

6.4

t6.4

t2,5

82

litre

s89

GJ

Gaso

line

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l1,7

70 G

J$58,1

71

127.5

tG

aso

line

$57,4

79

50,4

03

litre

s1,7

47

GJ

125.9

t

Die

sel

Fuel

$692

589

litre

s23

GJ

1.6

t

Mis

c.

PARK

S MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S EQ

UIP

. - 3

41$1,1

11

32 G

J$1,1

11

2.3

t2.3

t919

litre

s32

GJ

Gaso

line

WO

RKS M

ISC

ELLA

NEO

US -

345

$1,2

63

38 G

J$1,2

63

2.7

t2.7

t1,1

01

litre

s38

GJ

Gaso

line

Mis

c. S

ubto

tal

70 G

J$2,3

74

5.0

tG

aso

line

$2,3

74

2,0

19

litre

s70

GJ

5.0

t

Prop

ane

Equi

pm

ent

FORK

LIF

T -7 G

J$218

0.4

t0.4

t272

litre

s$218

7G

JP

ropane

Mbl

S EC

HEL

T ARE

NA Z

AM

BON

I -129 G

J$4,0

68

7.7

t7.7

t5,0

86

litre

s$4,0

68

129

GJ

Pro

pane

Mbl

Prop

ane

Equi

pm

ent S

ubto

tal

136 G

J$4,2

86

8.1

t5,3

58

litre

s136

$4,2

86

GJ

8.1

tP

ropane

Mbl

Consum

ption

CO

e 2C

osts

Energ

y6,1

37 G

J$197,7

31

440.0

t

Gaso

line

$108,4

73

94,4

68

litre

s3,2

74

GJ

235.9

t

Die

sel

Fuel

$84,9

72

70,5

11

litre

s2,7

27

GJ

196.0

t

Pro

pane

5,3

58

litre

s136

$4,2

86

GJ

8.1

tM

bl

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

SOLI

D W

AST

E

Ad

min

istr

atio

n O

ffice

s

13.4

tA

DM

INIS

TRA

TIO

N B

UIL

DIN

G -

25.2

013.4

t168

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Offi

ces

Sub

tota

l13.4

tS

olid

Waste

168

cu. yds

25.2

013.4

t

Com

mun

ity

Cen

tre

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

420

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

53

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyEs

timat

ion

Met

hod

Volu

me

Mas

sC

O2e

Typ

eA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mp

tion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

5.7

tG

IBSO

NS A

ND

ARE

A C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

ENTR

E - C

ARD

BOA

RD R

ECYC

LIN

G -

10.7

65.7

t72

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

Com

mun

ity C

entr

e Su

bto

tal

5.7

tS

olid

Waste

72

cu. yds

10.7

65.7

t

Fire

Ser

vice

s

0.1

tE G

MO

NT F

IRE H

ALL

-0.1

90.1

t1

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

2.1

tG

IBSO

NS F

IRE H

ALL

-3.9

62.1

t26

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

6.7

tH

ALF

MO

ON

BA

Y FI

RE H

ALL

-12.6

06.7

t84

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

1.9

tR O

BERT

S CRE

EK F

IRE H

ALL

-3.5

91.9

t24

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

Fire

Ser

vice

s Su

bto

tal

10.8

tS

olid

Waste

136

cu. yds

20.3

410.8

t

Ice

Are

nas

13.4

tS E

CH

ELT A

REN

A -

25.2

013.4

t168

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

Ice

Are

nas

Sub

tota

l13.4

tS

olid

Waste

168

cu. yds

25.2

013.4

t

Ind

oor P

ools

8.9

tG

IBSO

NS A

ND

ARE

A A

QU

ATI

C F

AC

ILIT

Y -

16.8

08.9

t112

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

4.4

tP E

ND

ER H

ARB

OU

R A

QU

ATI

C A

ND

FIT

NES

S CEN

TRE -

8.3

94.4

t56

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

26.7

tS E

CH

ELT A

QU

ATI

C C

ENTR

E -

50.4

026.7

t336

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

Indo

or P

ools

Sub

tota

l40.1

tS

olid

Waste

504

cu. yds

75.6

040.1

t

Park

s &

Pla

yin

g F

ield

s

18.4

tP A

RKS D

EPA

RTM

ENT -

34.7

118.4

t

Annual park

s w

aste

.

231

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

Park

s &

Pla

ying

Fie

lds

Sub

tota

l18.4

tS

olid

Waste

231

cu. yds

34.7

118.4

t

Pub

lic W

orks

Bld

gs

& Y

ard

s

53.3

tP U

BLIC

WO

RKS -

592

0 M

ASO

N R

D100.6

253.3

t671

cu. yds

Solid

Waste

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

520

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.294

0

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

54

Appendix II - Detailed GHG Emissions Inventory (2008) - Transit Buses

Corp

orat

e En

ergy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory:

200

8

CO2e

Cost

sEn

ergy

Cons

umpt

ion

Ener

gyCo

sts

CO2e

Type

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

2008

VEH

ICLE

FLE

ET

Buse

s (L

ease

d - D

o N

ot C

ount

)

1995

D40

LF N

EW F

LYER

808

32,0

09 G

J144.4

t144.4

t51,9

41

litre

s2,0

09

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

1995

D40

LF N

EW F

LYER

808

51,5

49 G

J111.3

t111.3

t40,0

48

litre

s1,5

49

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

1995

D40

LF N

EW F

LYER

809

1995 G

J71.5

t71.5

t25,7

24

litre

s995

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

1995

D40

LF N

EW F

LYER

809

31,7

79 G

J127.8

t127.8

t45,9

85

litre

s1,7

79

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

1995

D40

LF N

EW F

LYER

809

41,6

14 G

J116.0

t116.0

t41,7

34

litre

s1,6

14

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2001

FO

RD E

350

953

193 G

J13.9

t13.9

t5,0

00

litre

s193

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

2007

FO

RD B

US

2113

1,1

70 G

J84.1

t84.1

t30,2

55

litre

s1,1

70

GJ

Die

sel

Fuel

Buse

s (L

ease

d - D

o N

ot C

ount

) Sub

tota

l9,3

10 G

J669.0

tD

iesel

Fuel

240,6

87

litre

s9,3

10

GJ

669.0

t

Consum

ption

CO

e 2C

osts

Energ

y9,3

10 G

J669.0

t

Die

selF

uel

240,6

87

litre

s9,3

10

GJ

669.0

t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

4/26

/200

920

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Ener

gy &

Em

issi

ons

Mon

itori

ng a

nd R

epor

ting

Syst

em™

v.

3.01

55

Appendix III - Detailed GHG Emissions Inventory (2008) By Department

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

2008

BU

ILD

ING

S/B

YLA

W

Gas

olin

e Pa

ssen

ger

Car

s

$2

,81

48

6 G

J$

2,8

14

6.2

t6

.2 t

2,4

75

litre

s8

6G

JG

aso

line

2000

SU

ZUKI

VIT

RA. C

OST

CEN

TRE 5

20

$4

,54

51

36

GJ

$4

,54

59

.8 t

9.8

t3

,92

6lit

res

13

6G

JG

aso

line

2002

FO

RD R

AN

GER

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 290

$1

,55

94

7 G

J$

1,5

59

3.4

t3

.4 t

1,3

59

litre

s4

7G

JG

aso

line

2003

GEO

TRA

CKE

R. C

OST

CEN

TRE 5

20

$1

,79

65

4 G

J$

1,7

96

3.9

t3

.9 t

1,5

71

litre

s5

4G

JG

aso

line

2003

GEO

TRA

CKE

R. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

00

$3

,20

69

8 G

J$

3,2

06

7.0

t7

.0 t

2,8

22

litre

s9

8G

JG

aso

line

2004

CH

EV T

RCKR

4D

RHT.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 520

Gas

olin

e Pa

ssen

ger C

ars

Sub

tota

l4

21

GJ

$1

3,9

20

30

.4 t

Ga

so

line

$1

3,9

20

12

,15

3lit

res

42

1G

J3

0.4

t

Lig

ht T

ruck

s, V

ans,

an

d S

UV

s

$2

,46

37

2 G

J$

2,4

63

5.2

t5

.2 t

2,0

73

litre

s7

2G

JG

aso

line

E250

VA

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 5

20

$1

,19

13

5 G

J$

1,1

91

2.5

t2

.5 t

1,0

20

litre

s3

5G

JG

aso

line

F ORD

ESC

APE

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 520

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l1

07

GJ

$3

,65

47

.7 t

Ga

so

line

$3

,65

43

,09

3lit

res

10

7G

J7

.7 t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y5

28

GJ

$1

7,5

74

38

.1 t

Ga

so

line

$1

7,5

74

15

,24

6lit

res

52

8G

J3

8.1

t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

BU

ILD

ING

MA

INTE

NA

NC

E

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s

$1

,92

66

2 G

J$

1,9

26

4.4

t4

.4 t

1,5

99

litre

s6

2G

JD

iese

lF

ue

l20

08 F

ORD

F35

0 4X

4 SU

PER

CA

B. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

13

28/0

6/20

0920

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Ener

gy

& E

mis

sion

s M

onit

orin

g a

nd

Rep

orti

ng

Sys

tem

™

v.3.

01

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

56

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s Su

bto

tal

62

GJ

$1

,92

64

.4 t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

1,9

26

1,5

99

litre

s6

2G

J4

.4 t

Lig

ht T

ruck

s, V

ans,

an

d S

UV

s

$5

77

16

GJ

$5

77

1.2

t1

.2 t

46

7lit

res

16

GJ

Ga

so

line

1979

CH

EVY

VAN

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 313

$2

57

9 G

J$

25

70

.6 t

0.6

t2

53

litre

s9

GJ

Ga

so

line

F250

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 313

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l2

5 G

J$

83

41

.8 t

Ga

so

line

$8

34

71

9lit

res

25

GJ

1.8

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y8

7 G

J$

2,7

60

6.2

t

Ga

so

line

$8

34

71

9lit

res

25

GJ

1.8

t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

1,9

26

1,5

99

litre

s6

2G

J4

.4 t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

CO

RPO

RATE

SER

VIC

ES

Ad

min

istr

atio

n O

ffice

s

$3

1,7

03

1,7

19

GJ

$3

1,7

03

10

.5 t

10

.5 t

47

7,5

81

kW

h1

,71

9G

JE

lectr

icity

AD

MIN

ISTR

ATI

ON

BU

ILD

ING

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 114

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Offi

ces

Sub

tota

l1

,71

9 G

J$

31

,70

31

0.5

t$

31

,70

34

77

,58

1kW

hE

lectr

icity

1,7

19

GJ

10

.5 t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y1

,71

9 G

J$

31

,70

31

0.5

t

$3

1,7

03

47

7,5

81

kW

hE

lectr

icity

1,7

19

GJ

10

.5 t

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

Lig

ht T

ruck

s, V

ans,

an

d S

UV

s

$1

,17

63

6 G

J$

1,1

76

2.6

t2

.6 t

1,0

39

litre

s3

6G

JG

aso

line

2003

CH

EV V

ENTU

RE V

AN

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 112

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l3

6 G

J$

1,1

76

2.6

tG

aso

line

$1

,17

61

,03

9lit

res

36

GJ

2.6

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y3

6 G

J$

1,1

76

2.6

t

Ga

so

line

$1

,17

61

,03

9lit

res

36

GJ

2.6

t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

Ad

min

istr

atio

n O

ffice

s

13

.4 t

25

.20

13

.4 t

16

8cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

AD

MIN

ISTR

ATI

ON

BU

ILD

ING

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 114

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 2

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

57

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyEs

timat

ion

Met

hod

Volu

me

Mas

sC

O2e

Typ

eA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mp

tion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Offi

ces

Sub

tota

l1

3.4

tS

olid

Wa

ste

16

8cu

. yd

s2

5.2

01

3.4

t

Ma

ss

Vo

lum

e1

3.4

t

So

lidW

aste

16

8cu

. yd

s2

5.2

0t

13

.4 t

Solid

Was

te S

ubto

tal

CO

e 2

PARK

S

Com

mun

ity

Hal

l

$4

69

$1

,90

1

84

GJ

$2

,37

04

.6 t

0.1

t

4.5

t

6,3

92

kW

h

1,5

84

litre

s

23

GJ

61

GJ

Fu

elO

il

Ele

ctr

icity

CH

AST

ER H

OU

SE. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$1

,31

35

6 G

J$

1,3

13

0.3

t0

.3 t

15

,55

5kW

h5

6G

JE

lectr

icity

CO

OPE

RS G

REEN

HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$9

69

$2

,96

2

19

2 G

J$

3,9

31

8.0

t0

.2 t

7.7

t

11

,21

3kW

h

15

1G

J

40

GJ

15

1G

JN

atu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

E RIC

CA

RDIN

AL H

ALL

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

$9

45

40

GJ

$9

45

0.2

t0

.2 t

11

,06

2kW

h4

0G

JE

lectr

icity

F RA

NK

WES

T HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$1

,68

97

3 G

J$

1,6

89

0.4

t0

.4 t

20

,18

1kW

h7

3G

JE

lectr

icity

GRA

NTH

AM

S LA

ND

ING

CO

MM

UN

ITY

HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

Com

mun

ity H

all S

ubto

tal

44

5 G

J$

10

,24

81

3.7

t$

5,3

85

64

,40

3kW

hE

lectr

icity

23

2G

J1

.4 t

$2

,96

21

51

GJ

Na

tura

lG

as

15

1G

J7

.7 t

$1

,90

11

,58

4lit

res

61

GJ

4.5

tF

ue

lO

il

Fire

Ser

vice

s

$1

,45

76

2 G

J$

1,4

57

0.4

t0

.4 t

17

,34

5kW

h6

2G

JE

lectr

icity

F RA

NK

WES

T FIR

E HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

Fire

Ser

vice

s Su

bto

tal

62

GJ

$1

,45

70

.4 t

$1

,45

71

7,3

45

kW

hE

lectr

icity

62

GJ

0.4

t

Mis

c.

$2

,58

21

09

GJ

$2

,58

20

.7 t

0.7

t3

0,1

90

kW

h1

09

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

K ATH

ERIN

E LA

KE C

AM

PGRO

UN

D .

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

$7

10

GJ

$7

10

.0 t

0.0

t2

9kW

h0

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

R OBE

RTS C

REEK

PIE

R PA

RK. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

Mis

c. S

ubto

tal

10

9 G

J$

2,6

53

0.7

t$

2,6

53

30

,21

9kW

hE

lectr

icity

10

9G

J0

.7 t

Park

s &

Pla

yin

g F

ield

s

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 3

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

58

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e $1

58

6 G

J$

15

80

.0 t

0.0

t1

,71

3kW

h6

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

P EN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

SPO

RTSF

IELD

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

Park

s &

Pla

ying

Fie

lds

Sub

tota

l6

GJ

$1

58

0.0

t$

15

81

,71

3kW

hE

lectr

icity

6G

J0

.0 t

Pub

lic W

orks

Bld

gs

& Y

ard

s

$5

92

$3

,85

5

22

2 G

J$

4,4

47

10

.3 t

0.1

t

10

.1 t

6,5

83

kW

h

19

8G

J

24

GJ

19

8G

JN

atu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

P ARK

S HU

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

Pub

lic W

orks

Bld

gs &

Yar

ds S

ubto

tal

22

2 G

J$

4,4

47

10

.3 t

$5

92

6,5

83

kW

hE

lectr

icity

24

GJ

0.1

t

$3

,85

51

98

GJ

Na

tura

lG

as

19

8G

J1

0.1

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y8

44

GJ

$1

8,9

63

25

.0 t

$1

0,2

45

12

0,2

63

kW

hE

lectr

icity

43

3G

J2

.6 t

$6

,81

73

50

GJ

Na

tura

lG

as

35

0G

J1

7.9

t

$1

,90

11

,58

4lit

res

61

GJ

4.5

tF

ue

lO

il

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

Park

ing

Lot

Lig

hti

ng

(op

en)

$1

70

5 G

J$

17

00

.0 t

0.0

t1

,33

8kW

h5

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S HIR

LEY

MA

CEY

PA

RK. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$7

,05

63

13

GJ

$7

,05

61

.9 t

1.9

t8

7,0

40

kW

h3

13

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S UN

SHIN

E CO

AST

ARE

NA .

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

Park

ing

Lot L

ight

ing

(op

en) S

ubto

tal

31

8 G

J$

7,2

25

1.9

t$

7,2

25

88

,37

8kW

hE

lectr

icity

31

8G

J1

.9 t

Park

s &

Pla

yin

g F

ield

s

$6

,06

92

68

GJ

$6

,06

91

.6 t

1.6

t

Inclu

de

s c

are

take

r b

uild

ing

an

d w

ash

roo

ms

74

,53

0kW

h2

68

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

CLI

FF G

ILKE

R PA

RK. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

Park

s &

Pla

ying

Fie

lds

Sub

tota

l2

68

GJ

$6

,06

91

.6 t

$6

,06

97

4,5

30

kW

hE

lectr

icity

26

8G

J1

.6 t

Pole

Lig

ht

$5

37

21

GJ

$5

37

0.1

t0

.1 t

5,9

27

kW

h2

1G

JE

lectr

icity

CLI

FF G

ILKE

R PA

RK. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$1

05

2 G

J$

10

50

.0 t

0.0

t4

30

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

CO

NN

OR

PARK

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

$5

76

29

GJ

$5

76

0.2

t0

.2 t

7,9

74

kW

h2

9G

JE

lectr

icity

CO

OPE

R’S G

REEN

PA

RK. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 4

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

59

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e $7

82

GJ

$7

80

.0 t

0.0

t4

55

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

DA

N B

OSC

H P

ARK

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

$9

32

GJ

$9

30

.0 t

0.0

t4

35

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

F RA

NK

WES

T HA

LL A

ND

FIR

E HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$8

04

32

GJ

$8

04

0.2

t0

.2 t

9,0

26

kW

h3

2G

JE

lectr

icity

K ATH

ERIN

E LA

KE C

AM

PGRO

UN

D .

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

Pole

Lig

ht S

ubto

tal

87

GJ

$2

,19

40

.5 t

$2

,19

42

4,2

47

kW

hE

lectr

icity

87

GJ

0.5

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y6

74

GJ

$1

5,4

88

4.1

t

$1

5,4

88

18

7,1

55

kW

hE

lectr

icity

67

4G

J4

.1 t

Ligh

ting

Sub

tota

l

Die

sel F

uel O

ff R

oad

Veh

icle

s &

Eq

uip

men

t

$1

39

4 G

J$

13

90

.3 t

0.3

t1

02

litre

s4

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

l19

87 G

ATO

R JO

HN

DEE

RE. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$2

,93

01

11

GJ

$2

,93

08

.0 t

8.0

t2

,87

7lit

res

11

1G

JD

iese

lF

ue

l20

05 P

ISTE

N B

ULL

Y PB

100.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 680

$8

15

24

GJ

$8

15

1.7

t1

.7 t

62

9lit

res

24

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

lTR

AC

TOR.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

Die

sel F

uel O

ff R

oad

Vehi

cles

& E

quip

men

t Sub

tota

l1

40

GJ

$3

,88

41

0.0

tD

iese

lF

ue

l$

3,8

84

3,6

08

litre

s1

40

GJ

10

.0 t

Gas

olin

e O

ff R

oad

Veh

icle

s &

Eq

uip

men

t

$1

70

GJ

$1

70

.0 t

0.0

t1

2lit

res

0G

JG

aso

line

2005

JO

HN

DEE

RE T

RAIL

BUC

K A

TV. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$3

93

14

GJ

$3

93

1.0

t1

.0 t

39

6lit

res

14

GJ

Ga

so

line

2006

SKA

ND

IC S

WT 5

50F S

KID

OO

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 680

$3

19

9 G

J$

31

90

.6 t

0.6

t2

59

litre

s9

GJ

Ga

so

line

MO

WER

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

Gas

olin

e O

ff R

oad

Vehi

cles

& E

quip

men

t Sub

tota

l2

3 G

J$

72

81

.7 t

Ga

so

line

$7

28

66

7lit

res

23

GJ

1.7

t

Gas

olin

e Pa

ssen

ger

Car

s

$8

58

26

GJ

$8

58

1.9

t1

.9 t

75

6lit

res

26

GJ

Ga

so

line

92 T

RAC

KER.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

Gas

olin

e Pa

ssen

ger C

ars

Sub

tota

l2

6 G

J$

85

81

.9 t

Ga

so

line

$8

58

75

6lit

res

26

GJ

1.9

t

Lig

ht T

ruck

s, V

ans,

an

d S

UV

s

$3

,14

69

3 G

J$

3,1

46

6.7

t6

.7 t

2,6

73

litre

s9

3G

JG

aso

line

2000

F25

0 F O

RD. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 5

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

60

Cor

por

ate

Ener

gy &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mp

tion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

pe

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

$3

,52

71

20

GJ

$3

,52

78

.6 t

8.6

t3

,45

3lit

res

12

0G

JG

aso

line

2000

FO

RD F

250.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

$2

,26

16

7 G

J$

2,2

61

4.8

t4

.8 t

1,9

34

litre

s6

7G

JG

aso

line

2003

FO

RD F

250

P/U

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

$2

,48

67

7 G

J$

2,4

86

5.5

t5

.5 t

2,2

14

litre

s7

7G

JG

aso

line

2004

FO

RD F

250

REG

CA

B 2W

D. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$3

,02

58

9 G

J$

3,0

25

6.4

t6

.4 t

2,5

76

litre

s8

9G

JG

aso

line

2007

FO

RD R

AN

GER

FLA

T DEC

K. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$3

,10

91

05

GJ

$3

,10

97

.6 t

7.6

t3

,04

3lit

res

10

5G

JG

aso

line

2007

FO

RD R

AN

GER

FLA

TDEC

K. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

$2

,80

38

0 G

J$

2,8

03

5.8

t5

.8 t

2,3

10

litre

s8

0G

JG

aso

line

CH

EV S

ILVE

RAD

O 2

DR.

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 650

$2

,62

07

7 G

J$

2,6

20

5.5

t5

.5 t

2,2

12

litre

s7

7G

JG

aso

line

E150

2D

R P/

U. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l7

08

GJ

$2

2,9

77

51

.0 t

Ga

so

line

$2

2,9

77

20

,41

4lit

res

70

8G

J5

1.0

t

Mis

c.

$1

,11

13

2 G

J$

1,1

11

2.3

t2

.3 t

91

9lit

res

32

GJ

Ga

so

line

P ARK

S MIS

CEL

LAN

EOU

S EQ

UIP

.. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

Mis

c. S

ubto

tal

32

GJ

$1

,11

12

.3 t

Ga

so

line

$1

,11

19

19

litre

s3

2G

J2

.3 t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y9

28

GJ

$2

9,5

58

66

.9 t

Ga

so

line

$2

5,6

74

22

,75

6lit

res

78

9G

J5

6.8

t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

3,8

84

3,6

08

litre

s1

40

GJ

10

.0 t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

Park

s &

Pla

yin

g F

ield

s

18

.4 t

34

.71

18

.4 t

An

nu

al p

ark

s w

aste

.

23

1cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

PARK

S DEP

ART

MEN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

50

Park

s &

Pla

ying

Fie

lds

Sub

tota

l1

8.4

tS

olid

Wa

ste

23

1cu

. yd

s3

4.7

11

8.4

t

Ma

ss

Vo

lum

e1

8.4

t

So

lidW

aste

23

1cu

. yd

s3

4.7

1t

18

.4 t

Solid

Was

te S

ubto

tal

CO

e 2

PLA

NN

ING

Lig

ht T

ruck

s, V

ans,

an

d S

UV

s

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 6

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

61

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

$1

,02

73

0 G

J$

1,0

27

2.2

t2

.2 t

87

2lit

res

30

GJ

Ga

so

line

2001

FO

RD W

DST

R. C

OST

CEN

TRE 5

04

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l3

0 G

J$

1,0

27

2.2

tG

aso

line

$1

,02

78

72

litre

s3

0G

J2

.2 t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y3

0 G

J$

1,0

27

2.2

t

Ga

so

line

$1

,02

78

72

litre

s3

0G

J2

.2 t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

PRO

TEC

TIV

E SE

RVIC

ES

Fire

Ser

vice

s

$8

57

35

GJ

$8

57

0.2

t0

.2 t

9,6

34

kW

h3

5G

JE

lectr

icity

E GM

ON

T AN

D D

ISTR

ICT F

IRE H

ALL

TEM

PORA

RY A

CC

OU

NT.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 218

$3

,93

3

$3

,60

2

35

4 G

J$

7,5

35

10

.3 t

1.1

t

9.3

t

47

,89

4kW

h

18

1G

J

17

2G

J

18

1G

JN

atu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

GIB

SON

S FIR

E HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

10

$4

,82

33

30

GJ

$8

,52

68

.4 t

$3

,70

3

1.3

t

7.1

t

59

,12

9kW

h

4,6

29

litre

s

21

3G

J

11

7G

JP

rop

an

e

Ele

ctr

icity

HA

LFM

OO

N B

AY

FIRE

HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

$6

99

36

GJ

$6

99

0.2

t0

.2 t

9,9

25

kW

h3

6G

JE

lectr

icity

HA

LFM

OO

N B

AY

FIRE

HA

LL S

ATE

LLIT

E STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

$3

,99

61

76

GJ

$3

,99

61

.1 t

1.1

t4

8,9

31

kW

h1

76

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

R OBE

RTS C

REEK

FIR

E HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

12

Fire

Ser

vice

s Su

btot

al9

30

GJ

$2

1,6

14

20

.3 t

$1

4,3

08

17

5,5

14

kW

hE

lectr

icity

63

2G

J3

.9 t

$3

,60

21

81

GJ

Na

tura

lGa

s1

81

GJ

9.3

t

Pro

pa

ne

4,6

29

litre

s1

17

$3

,70

3G

J7

.1 t

Rad

io T

rans

mit

ter/

Rep

eate

r/Re

ceiv

er

$7

28

30

GJ

$7

28

0.2

t0

.2 t

8,2

76

kW

h3

0G

JE

lectr

icity

R AD

IO R

ELA

Y ST

ATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 216

$1

14

2 G

J$

11

40

.0 t

0.0

t6

49

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

R AD

IO R

ELA

Y ST

ATI

ON

9-1

-1. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

20

Radi

o Tr

ansm

itter

/Rep

eate

r/Re

ceiv

er S

ubto

tal

32

GJ

$8

42

0.2

t$

84

28

,92

5kW

hE

lectr

icity

32

GJ

0.2

t

Stor

age

Faci

lity

$1

50

GJ

$1

50

.0 t

0.0

t5

2kW

h0

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S TO

RAG

E. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

22

Stor

age

Faci

lity

Subt

otal

0 G

J$

15

0.0

t$

15

52

kW

hE

lectr

icity

0G

J0

.0 t

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 7

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

62

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y

4,6

29

96

2 G

J$

22

,47

12

0.5

t

$1

5,1

66

18

4,4

91

kW

hE

lectr

icity

66

4G

J4

.1 t

$3

,60

21

81

GJ

Na

tura

lG

as

18

1G

J9

.3 t

Pro

pa

ne

litre

s1

17

$3

,70

3G

J7

.1 t

Stn

ry

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

Pole

Lig

ht

$6

8$

68

0.0

tH

ILLS

IDE I

ND

PA

RK. C

OST

CEN

TRE 5

40

Pole

Lig

ht S

ubto

tal

$6

80

.0 t

$6

8

$6

80

.0 t

$6

8Li

ghtin

g Su

btot

al

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s

$5

54

18

GJ

$5

54

1.3

t1

.3 t

45

8lit

res

18

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

l19

99 4

WH

DR

FORD

F55

0. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

$6

53

21

GJ

$6

53

1.5

t1

.5 t

53

7lit

res

21

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

l20

05 G

MC 2

WH

DR

(RED

). C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

$4

00

17

GJ

$4

00

1.2

t1

.2 t

43

1lit

res

17

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

lR E

SCU

E TRU

CK.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 216

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s Su

btot

al5

5 G

J$

1,6

08

4.0

tD

iese

lF

ue

l$

1,6

08

1,4

26

litre

s5

5G

J4

.0 t

Fire

Ser

vice

s

$9

43

GJ

$9

40

.2 t

0.2

t9

4lit

res

3G

JG

aso

line

1981

I NTE

RNA

TIO

NA

L 2 W

HD

R. FI

RE T

RUC

K (Y

ELLO

W).

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 218

$8

56

25

GJ

$8

56

1.8

t1

.8 t

71

6lit

res

25

GJ

Ga

so

line

1985

2 W

HD

R RE

D G

MC. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

$1

,12

63

8 G

J$

1,1

26

2.8

t2

.8 t

1,1

03

litre

s3

8G

JG

aso

line

1997

FO

RD E

XPL

R 4

DRS

W. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

12

$3

75

12

GJ

$3

75

0.9

t0

.9 t

31

8lit

res

12

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

l19

98 P

UM

PER

FREI

GH

TLIN

ER. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

$7

66

22

GJ

$7

66

1.6

t1

.6 t

63

8lit

res

22

GJ

Ga

so

line

E GM

ON

T VO

LUN

TEER

FIR

E DEP

ART

MEN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

18

$4

,55

1

$4

,22

92

57

GJ

$8

,78

01

8.5

t9

.5 t

9.0

t

3,7

92

litre

s

3,2

53

litre

s

13

1G

J

12

6G

JG

aso

line

Die

se

lF

ue

l

GIB

SON

S VO

LUN

TEER

FIR

E DEP

ART

MEN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

10

$1

,21

03

5 G

J$

1,2

10

2.5

t2

.5 t

1,0

08

litre

s3

5G

JG

aso

line

R OBE

RTS C

REEK

FIR

E HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

12

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 8

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

63

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype $4

58

$1

38

18

GJ

$5

96

1.3

t1

.0 t

0.3

t

38

1lit

res

11

6lit

res

13

GJ

4G

JG

aso

line

Die

se

lF

ue

l

S EA

RCH

AN

D R

ESC

UE.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 222

Fire

Ser

vice

s Su

btot

al4

11

GJ

$1

3,8

04

29

.6 t

Ga

so

line

$9

,06

17

,73

3lit

res

26

8G

J1

9.3

t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

4,7

43

3,6

87

litre

s1

43

GJ

10

.2 t

Gas

olin

e M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s &

Van

s

$2

40

7 G

J$

24

00

.5 t

0.5

t2

05

litre

s7

GJ

Ga

so

line

2007

FO

RD 5

50 R

ESC

UE T

RUC

K. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

22

Gas

olin

e M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s &

Van

s Su

btot

al7

GJ

$2

40

0.5

tG

aso

line

$2

40

20

5lit

res

7G

J0

.5 t

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UV

s

$7

96

27

GJ

$7

96

1.9

t1

.9 t

77

9lit

res

27

GJ

Ga

so

line

1985

WH

DR

RED

GM

C. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

$4

38

12

GJ

$4

38

0.9

t0

.9 t

34

1lit

res

12

GJ

Ga

so

line

1986

2W

HD

R RE

D G

MC. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

$6

92

20

GJ

$6

92

1.5

t1

.5 t

58

9lit

res

20

GJ

Ga

so

line

1996

FO

RD A

ERO

STA

R. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

10

$1

89

5 G

J$

18

90

.4 t

0.4

t1

44

litre

s5

GJ

Ga

so

line

1997

CH

EVRO

LET V

AN

2D

RSW

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 216

$1

,24

73

8 G

J$

1,2

47

2.7

t2

.7 t

1,0

86

litre

s3

8G

JG

aso

line

1997

FO

RD E

XPL

OR

4DRS

W (R

ED).

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 212

$3

,77

11

14

GJ

$3

,77

18

.2 t

8.2

t3

,30

1lit

res

11

4G

JG

aso

line

2004

CH

EVRO

LET S

ILVR

. P/U

P. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l2

16

GJ

$7

,13

31

5.6

tG

aso

line

$7

,13

36

,24

0lit

res

21

6G

J1

5.6

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y6

89

GJ

$2

2,7

85

49

.6 t

Ga

so

line

$1

6,4

34

14

,17

7lit

res

49

1G

J3

5.4

t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

6,3

50

5,1

13

litre

s1

98

GJ

14

.2 t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

Fire

Ser

vice

s

0.1

t0

.19

0.1

t1

cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

EGM

ON

T FIR

E HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

18

2.1

t3

.96

2.1

t2

6cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

GIB

SON

S FIR

E HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

10

6.7

t1

2.6

06

.7 t

84

cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

HA

LFM

OO

N B

AY

FIRE

HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

16

1.9

t3

.59

1.9

t2

4cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

ROBE

RTS C

REEK

FIR

E HA

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 2

12

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 9

2008

Ene

rgy

& G

reen

hous

e G

as E

mis

sion

s In

vent

ory

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

64

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyEs

timat

ion

Met

hod

Volu

me

Mas

sC

O2e

Type

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e

Fire

Ser

vice

s Su

btot

al1

0.8

tS

olid

Wa

ste

13

6cu

. yd

s2

0.3

41

0.8

t

Ma

ss

Vo

lum

e1

0.8

t

So

lidW

aste

13

6cu

. yd

s2

0.3

4t

10

.8 t

Solid

Was

te S

ubto

tal

CO

e 2

PUB

LIC

HEA

LTH

SER

VIC

ES

Cem

eter

y

$6

60

GJ

$6

60

.0 t

0.0

t2

1kW

h0

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S EA

VIEW

CEM

ETER

Y. C

OST

CEN

TRE 4

00

Cem

eter

y Su

btot

al0

GJ

$6

60

.0 t

$6

62

1kW

hE

lectr

icity

0G

J0

.0 t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y0

GJ

$6

60

.0 t

$6

62

1kW

hE

lectr

icity

0G

J0

.0 t

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

REC

REA

TIO

N

Ice

Are

nas

$9

51

43

GJ

$9

51

0.3

t0

.3 t

11

,95

7kW

h4

3G

JE

lectr

icity

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

ENTR

E. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

17

$6

8,7

00

$2

7,3

30

6,0

08

GJ

$9

6,0

30

11

8.8

t2

5.6

t

93

.2 t

1,1

62

,68

8kW

h

1,8

22

GJ

4,1

86

GJ

1,8

22

GJ

Na

tura

lGa

s

Ele

ctr

icity

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

ENTR

E. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

17

$4

3,0

78

$1

0,4

25

3,0

93

GJ

$5

3,5

03

49

.0 t

14

.8 t

34

.2 t

67

3,3

08

kW

h

66

9G

J

2,4

24

GJ

66

9G

JN

atu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

S UN

SHIN

E CO

AST

ARE

NA .

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 620

Ice

Are

nas

Subt

otal

9,1

44

GJ

$1

50

,48

41

68

.1 t

$1

12

,72

91

,84

7,9

52

kW

hE

lectr

icity

6,6

53

GJ

40

.7 t

$3

7,7

55

2,4

91

GJ

Na

tura

lGa

s2

,49

1G

J1

27

.4 t

Ind

oor P

ools

$1

3,8

13

$4

8,0

27

4,1

35

GJ

$6

1,8

40

18

4.0

t3

.7 t

18

0.2

t

16

9,6

84

kW

h

3,5

24

GJ

61

1G

J

3,5

24

GJ

Na

tura

lGa

s

Ele

ctr

icity

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA A

QU

ATI

C F

AC

ILIT

Y. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

16

$3

2,4

41

1,9

90

GJ

$3

2,4

41

12

.2 t

12

.2 t

55

2,6

61

kW

h1

,99

0G

JE

lectr

icity

P EN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

AQ

UA

TIC &

FIT

NES

S CEN

TRE.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 625

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

020

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

65

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

$6

7,7

90

$1

66

,80

0

16

,82

9 G

J$

23

4,5

90

66

4.6

t2

6.6

t

63

8.0

t

1,2

10

,18

1kW

h

12

,47

3G

J

4,3

57

GJ

12

,47

3G

JN

atu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

S EC

HEL

T AQ

UA

TIC C

ENTR

E. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

21

Indo

or P

ools

Sub

tota

l2

2,9

53

GJ

$3

28

,87

08

60

.7 t

$1

14

,04

41

,93

2,5

26

kW

hE

lectr

icity

6,9

57

GJ

42

.5 t

$2

14

,82

71

5,9

96

GJ

Na

tura

lGa

s1

5,9

96

GJ

81

8.2

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y3

2,0

97

GJ

$4

79

,35

51

,02

8.8

t

$2

26

,77

33

,78

0,4

78

kW

hE

lectr

icity

13

,61

0G

J8

3.2

t

$2

52

,58

21

8,4

87

GJ

Na

tura

lG

as

18

,48

7G

J9

45

.6 t

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

Park

ing

Lot L

ight

ing

(op

en)

$1

,74

17

5 G

J$

1,7

41

0.5

t0

.5 t

20

,70

2kW

h7

5G

JE

lectr

icity

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA A

QU

ATI

C F

AC

ILIT

Y. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

16

Park

ing

Lot L

ight

ing

(ope

n) S

ubto

tal

75

GJ

$1

,74

10

.5 t

$1

,74

12

0,7

02

kW

hE

lectr

icity

75

GJ

0.5

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y7

5 G

J$

1,7

41

0.5

t

$1

,74

12

0,7

02

kW

hE

lectr

icity

75

GJ

0.5

t

Ligh

ting

Subt

otal

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UV

s

$5

83

17

GJ

$5

83

1.2

t1

.2 t

50

0lit

res

17

GJ

Ga

so

line

2008

FO

RD R

AN

GER

P/P

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 617

$1

81

5 G

J$

18

10

.4 t

0.4

t1

54

litre

s5

GJ

Ga

so

line

2008

FO

RD R

AN

GER

W/ C

AN

OPY

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 617

$1

,44

84

2 G

J$

1,4

48

3.0

t3

.0 t

Co

sts

sp

lit b

etw

ee

n f

ou

r fa

cili

tie

s1,2

12

litre

s4

2G

JG

aso

line

2008

FO

RDF2

50 S

UPE

R C

AB.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

$6

89

21

GJ

$6

89

1.5

t1

.5 t

61

9lit

res

21

GJ

Ga

so

line

95 F

ORD

RA

NG

ER. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

10

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l8

6 G

J$

2,9

01

6.2

tG

aso

line

$2

,90

12

,48

5lit

res

86

GJ

6.2

t

Prop

ane

Equi

pm

ent

7 G

J$

21

80

.4 t

0.4

t2

72

litre

s$

21

87

GJ

Pro

pa

ne

Mb

lF O

RK L

IFT.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

12

9 G

J$

4,0

68

7.7

t7

.7 t

5,0

86

litre

s$

4,0

68

12

9G

JP

rop

an

eM

bl

S EC

HEL

T ARE

NA Z

AM

BON

I. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

20

Prop

ane

Equi

pmen

t Sub

tota

l1

36

GJ

$4

,28

68

.1 t

5,3

58

litre

s1

36

$4

,28

6G

J8

.1 t

Pro

pa

ne

Mb

l

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

120

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

66

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y2

22

GJ

$7

,18

71

4.4

t

Ga

so

line

$2

,90

12

,48

5lit

res

86

GJ

6.2

t

Pro

pa

ne

5,3

58

litre

s1

36

$4

,28

6G

J8

.1 t

Mb

l

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

Com

mun

ity

Cen

tre

5.7

t1

0.7

65

.7 t

72

cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA C

OM

MU

NIT

Y C

ENTR

E - C

ARD

BOA

RD R

ECYC

LIN

G. C

OST

C61

7C

omm

unity

Cen

tre

Subt

otal

5.7

tS

olid

Wa

ste

72

cu

. yd

s1

0.7

65

.7 t

Ice

Are

nas

13

.4 t

25

.20

13

.4 t

16

8cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

SEC

HEL

T ARE

NA. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

20

Ice

Are

nas

Subt

otal

13

.4 t

So

lidW

aste

16

8cu

. yd

s2

5.2

01

3.4

t

Ind

oor P

ools

8.9

t1

6.8

08

.9 t

11

2cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

GIB

SON

S AN

D A

REA A

QU

ATI

C F

AC

ILIT

Y. C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

16

4.4

t8

.39

4.4

t5

6cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

PEN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

AQ

UA

TIC A

ND

FIT

NES

S CEN

TRE.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 625

26

.7 t

50

.40

26

.7 t

33

6cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

SEC

HEL

T AQ

UA

TIC C

ENTR

E . C

OST

CEN

TRE 6

21

Indo

or P

ools

Sub

tota

l4

0.1

tS

olid

Wa

ste

50

4cu

. yd

s7

5.6

04

0.1

t

Ma

ss

Vo

lum

e5

9.1

t

So

lidW

aste

74

4cu

. yd

s1

11

.56

t5

9.1

t

Solid

Was

te S

ubto

tal

CO

e 2

SOLI

D W

AST

E

Mis

c.

$5

07

20

GJ

$5

07

0.1

t0

.1 t

5,5

16

kW

h2

0G

JE

lectr

icity

P EN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

LAN

DFI

LL O

FFIC

E AN

D S

CA

LE. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

51

$2

44

8 G

J$

24

40

.0 t

0.0

t2

,23

3kW

h8

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

P EN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

LAN

DFI

LL S

HA

RE S

HED

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 351

11

7 G

J$

3,6

87

7.1

t$

3,6

87

7.1

t4

,60

9lit

res

11

7G

JP

rop

an

eS E

CH

ELT L

AN

DFI

LL. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

52

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

220

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

67

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

Mis

c. S

ubto

tal

14

5 G

J$

4,4

38

7.3

t$

75

17

,74

9kW

hE

lectr

icity

28

GJ

0.2

t

Pro

pa

ne

4,6

09

litre

s1

17

$3

,68

7G

J7

.1 t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y

4,6

09

14

5 G

J$

4,4

38

7.3

t

$7

51

7,7

49

kW

hE

lectr

icity

28

GJ

0.2

t

Pro

pa

ne

litre

s1

17

$3

,68

7G

J7

.1 t

Stn

ry

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s

$1

,04

23

5 G

J$

1,0

42

2.5

t2

.5 t

90

7lit

res

35

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

l19

96 I N

TERN

ATI

ON

AL 2

WH

DR.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 353

$2

8,6

86

92

7 G

J$

28

,68

66

6.6

t6

6.6

t2

3,9

68

litre

s9

27

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

l20

06 I N

TERN

ATI

ON

AL R

ECYC

LIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

53

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s Su

btot

al9

62

GJ

$2

9,7

28

69

.1 t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

29

,72

82

4,8

75

litre

s9

62

GJ

69

.1 t

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UV

s

$6

83

GJ

$6

80

.2 t

0.2

t7

3lit

res

3G

JG

aso

line

1995

CH

EV S

-10.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 351

$1

,94

75

9 G

J$

1,9

47

4.2

t4

.2 t

1,6

94

litre

s5

9G

JG

aso

line

2005

CH

EVRO

LET C

OLO

RAD

O (W

HIT

E). C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

52

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l6

1 G

J$

2,0

15

4.4

tG

aso

line

$2

,01

51

,76

7lit

res

61

GJ

4.4

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y1

,02

3 G

J$

31

,74

37

3.6

t

Ga

so

line

$2

,01

51

,76

7lit

res

61

GJ

4.4

t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

29

,72

82

4,8

75

litre

s9

62

GJ

69

.1 t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

TRA

NSP

ORT

ATI

ON

SER

VIC

ES

Pub

lic W

orks

Bld

gs &

Yar

ds

$1

4,1

35

$9

,81

0

1,1

59

GJ

$2

3,9

45

31

.1 t

3.8

t

27

.2 t

17

3,9

51

kW

h

53

2G

J

62

6G

J

53

2G

JN

atu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

TRA

NSI

T BU

ILD

ING

AN

D W

ORK

S YA

RD. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

10, 3

12

Publ

ic W

orks

Bld

gs &

Yar

ds S

ubto

tal

1,1

59

GJ

$2

3,9

45

31

.1 t

$1

4,1

35

17

3,9

51

kW

hE

lectr

icity

62

6G

J3

.8 t

$9

,81

05

32

GJ

Na

tura

lGa

s5

32

GJ

27

.2 t

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

320

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

68

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y1

,15

9 G

J$

23

,94

53

1.1

t

$1

4,1

35

17

3,9

51

kW

hE

lectr

icity

62

6G

J3

.8 t

$9

,81

05

32

GJ

Na

tura

lG

as

53

2G

J2

7.2

t

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

Doc

k Li

ght

$1

29

3 G

J$

12

90

.0 t

0.0

t8

37

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

HA

LFM

OO

N B

AY

PORT

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 345

$1

78

5 G

J$

17

80

.0 t

0.0

t1

,43

2kW

h5

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

HO

PKIN

S LA

ND

ING

PO

RT. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

45

$3

09

11

GJ

$3

09

0.1

t0

.1 t

3,0

38

kW

h1

1G

JE

lectr

icity

K EA

TS R

OA

D. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

45

Doc

k Li

ght S

ubto

tal

19

GJ

$6

16

0.1

t$

61

65

,30

7kW

hE

lectr

icity

19

GJ

0.1

t

Ove

rhea

d L

ight

ing

$1

41

3 G

J$

14

10

.0 t

0.0

t6

97

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

AU

STIN

RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

20

$1

50

1 G

J$

15

00

.0 t

0.0

t3

98

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

B URN

S RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

40

$3

01

3 G

J$

30

10

.0 t

0.0

t8

02

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

F IRC

REST

RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

32

$1

41

3 G

J$

14

10

.0 t

0.0

t6

97

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GA

MBI

ER S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 320

$1

,50

31

4 G

J$

1,5

03

0.1

t0

.1 t

4,0

10

kW

h1

4G

JE

lectr

icity

GRA

NTH

AM

S LA

ND

ING

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G .

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 324

$1

50

1 G

J$

15

00

.0 t

0.0

t3

98

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

HYD

AW

AY

ROA

D S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 334

$1

,50

31

4 G

J$

1,5

03

0.1

t0

.1 t

4,0

10

kW

h1

4G

JE

lectr

icity

L AN

GD

ALE

STR

EET L

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

20

$5

,19

96

1 G

J$

5,1

99

0.4

t0

.4 t

16

,84

2kW

h6

1G

JE

lectr

icity

L AN

GD

ALE

STR

EET S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 322

$3

,40

93

9 G

J$

3,4

09

0.2

t0

.2 t

10

,82

4kW

h3

9G

JE

lectr

icity

P RA

TT R

OA

D S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 320

$5

,12

05

6 G

J$

5,1

20

0.3

t0

.3 t

15

,63

6kW

h5

6G

JE

lectr

icity

S EC

HEL

T [A

] STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

20

$3

,61

74

2 G

J$

3,6

17

0.3

t0

.3 t

11

,62

6kW

h4

2G

JE

lectr

icity

S EC

HEL

T [B]

STR

EET L

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

20

$1

50

1 G

J$

15

00

.0 t

0.0

t3

98

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S PRU

CE R

OA

D S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 328

$3

01

3 G

J$

30

10

.0 t

0.0

t8

02

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S TEW

ART

RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

42

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

420

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

69

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype $6

01

6 G

J$

60

10

.0 t

0.0

t1

,60

4kW

h6

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S UN

NYS

IDE A

REA S

TREE

TLIG

HTI

NG

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 336

$3

01

3 G

J$

30

10

.0 t

0.0

t8

02

kW

h3

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

V ETE

RAN

S RO

AD

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

26

$1

,46

81

6 G

J$

1,4

68

0.1

t0

.1 t

4,4

08

kW

h1

6G

JE

lectr

icity

WO

OD

CRE

EK P

ARK

STR

EETL

IGH

TIN

G. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

30

Ove

rhea

d Li

ghtin

g Su

btot

al2

66

GJ

$2

4,0

55

1.6

t$

24

,05

57

3,9

53

kW

hE

lectr

icity

26

6G

J1

.6 t

Park

ing

Lot L

ight

ing

(op

en)

$4

,30

35

1 G

J$

4,3

03

0.3

t0

.3 t

14

,18

3kW

h5

1G

JE

lectr

icity

AD

MIN

ISTR

ATI

ON

BU

ILD

ING

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 114

Park

ing

Lot L

ight

ing

(ope

n) S

ubto

tal

51

GJ

$4

,30

30

.3 t

$4

,30

31

4,1

83

kW

hE

lectr

icity

51

GJ

0.3

t

Pole

Lig

ht

$2

43

6 G

J$

24

30

.0 t

0.0

t1

,60

1kW

h6

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

K EA

TS R

OA

D. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

45

Pole

Lig

ht S

ubto

tal

6 G

J$

24

30

.0 t

$2

43

1,6

01

kW

hE

lectr

icity

6G

J0

.0 t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y3

42

GJ

$2

9,2

18

2.1

t

$2

9,2

18

95

,04

4kW

hE

lectr

icity

34

2G

J2

.1 t

Ligh

ting

Subt

otal

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UV

s

$2

,56

17

8 G

J$

2,5

61

5.6

t5

.6 t

2,2

61

litre

s7

8G

JG

aso

line

2005

CH

EVRO

LET C

OLO

RAD

O (W

HIT

E). C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

10

$1

,42

74

4 G

J$

1,4

27

3.2

t3

.2 t

1,2

81

litre

s4

4G

JG

aso

line

2005

CH

EVRO

LET S

ILVR

PIC

K-U

P. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

12

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l1

23

GJ

$3

,98

88

.8 t

Ga

so

line

$3

,98

83

,54

2lit

res

12

3G

J8

.8 t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y1

23

GJ

$3

,98

88

.8 t

Ga

so

line

$3

,98

83

,54

2lit

res

12

3G

J8

.8 t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

Pub

lic W

orks

Bld

gs &

Yar

ds

53

.3 t

10

0.6

25

3.3

t6

71

cu

. yd

sS

olid

Wa

ste

PUBL

IC W

ORK

S. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

Publ

ic W

orks

Bld

gs &

Yar

ds S

ubto

tal

53

.3 t

So

lidW

aste

67

1cu

. yd

s1

00

.62

53

.3 t

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

520

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

70

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyEs

timat

ion

Met

hod

Volu

me

Mas

sC

O2e

Type

Acc

ount

& A

ddre

ssA

ccou

nt S

ubto

tal

Acc

ount

Con

sum

ptio

n &

Cos

ts b

y En

ergy

Typ

e Ma

ss

Vo

lum

e5

3.3

t

So

lidW

aste

67

1cu

. yd

s1

00

.62

t5

3.3

t

Solid

Was

te S

ubto

tal

CO

e 2

WA

TER/

WA

STEW

ATE

R

Pub

lic W

orks

Bld

gs &

Yar

ds

$6

28

25

GJ

$6

28

0.2

t0

.2 t

7,0

33

kW

h2

5G

JE

lectr

icity

P UBL

IC W

ORK

S. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

Publ

ic W

orks

Bld

gs &

Yar

ds S

ubto

tal

25

GJ

$6

28

0.2

t$

62

87

,03

3kW

hE

lectr

icity

25

GJ

0.2

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y2

5 G

J$

62

80

.2 t

$6

28

7,0

33

kW

hE

lectr

icity

25

GJ

0.2

t

Build

ings

Sub

tota

l

Boo

ster

Pum

p S

tati

on

$1

5,4

56

73

1 G

J$

15

,45

64

.5 t

4.5

t2

03

,10

0kW

h7

31

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

CH

APM

AN

CRE

EK P

UM

P STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

79

Boos

ter P

ump

Stat

ion

Subt

otal

73

1 G

J$

15

,45

64

.5 t

$1

5,4

56

20

3,1

00

kW

hE

lectr

icity

73

1G

J4

.5 t

Chl

orin

atio

n St

atio

n

$1

52

4 G

J$

15

20

.0 t

0.0

t1

,09

9kW

h4

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GRA

Y C

REEK

CH

LORI

NA

TIO

N S

TATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

Chl

orin

atio

n St

atio

n Su

btot

al4

GJ

$1

52

0.0

t$

15

21

,09

9kW

hE

lectr

icity

4G

J0

.0 t

Liq

uid

Was

te L

ift S

tati

on

$1

41

4 G

J$

14

10

.0 t

0.0

t9

81

kW

h4

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

TRU

MA

N R

OA

D L

IFT S

TATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 387

Liqu

id W

aste

Lift

Sta

tion

Subt

otal

4 G

J$

14

10

.0 t

$1

41

98

1kW

hE

lectr

icity

4G

J0

.0 t

Liq

uid

Was

te T

reat

men

t Pla

nt

$1

,07

14

5 G

J$

1,0

71

0.3

t0

.3 t

12

,43

9kW

h4

5G

JE

lectr

icity

CU

RRA

N R

OA

D S

EWA

GE T

REA

TMEN

T PLA

NT.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 391

$4

,09

81

79

GJ

$4

,09

81

.1 t

1.1

t4

9,7

83

kW

h1

79

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

E MER

Y RO

AD

TRE

ATM

ENT P

LAN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

92

$2

,33

61

01

GJ

$2

,33

60

.6 t

0.6

t2

8,0

48

kW

h1

01

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

J OLL

Y RO

GER

TRE

ATM

ENT P

LAN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

84

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

620

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

71

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype $4

96

19

GJ

$4

96

0.1

t0

.1 t

5,4

00

kW

h1

9G

JE

lectr

icity

L AN

GD

ALE

TRE

ATM

ENT P

LAN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

88

$1

,43

16

1 G

J$

1,4

31

0.4

t0

.4 t

16

,87

5kW

h6

1G

JE

lectr

icity

L EE B

AY

TREA

TMEN

T PLA

NT.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 386

$2

,47

01

07

GJ

$2

,47

00

.7 t

0.7

t2

9,6

23

kW

h1

07

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

L ILY

LA

KE T

REA

TMEN

T PLA

NT.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$1

,21

75

1 G

J$

1,2

17

0.3

t0

.3 t

14

,23

5kW

h5

1G

JE

lectr

icity

MER

RILL

CRE

S TRE

ATM

ENT P

LAN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

90

$2

,28

99

9 G

J$

2,2

89

0.6

t0

.6 t

27

,44

9kW

h9

9G

JE

lectr

icity

S EC

RET C

OVE

MA

RIN

A T

REA

TMEN

T PLA

NT.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 385

$1

,39

65

9 G

J$

1,3

96

0.4

t0

.4 t

16

,45

6kW

h5

9G

JE

lectr

icity

S QU

ARE

BA

Y TR

EATM

ENT P

LAN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

87

$1

,80

17

7 G

J$

1,8

01

0.5

t0

.5 t

21

,48

6kW

h7

7G

JE

lectr

icity

WO

OD

CRE

EK T

REA

TMEN

T PLA

NT.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 382

Liqu

id W

aste

Tre

atm

ent P

lant

Sub

tota

l7

98

GJ

$1

8,6

06

4.9

t$

18

,60

62

21

,79

5kW

hE

lectr

icity

79

8G

J4

.9 t

Mis

c.

$6

3$

63

0.0

tM

ETER

ING

CH

AM

BER.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

Mis

c. S

ubto

tal

$6

30

.0 t

$6

3

Pota

ble

Wat

er D

eep

Wel

l

$1

0,7

83

54

5 G

J$

10

,78

33

.3 t

3.3

t1

51

,38

2kW

h5

45

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

CH

AST

ER R

OA

D W

ELL.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$1

,04

54

4 G

J$

1,0

45

0.3

t0

.3 t

12

,10

0kW

h4

4G

JE

lectr

icity

E AST

BOU

RNE W

ELL A

ND

WA

TER

TREA

TMEN

T FA

CIL

ITY.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$1

54

4 G

J$

15

40

.0 t

0.0

t1

,11

6kW

h4

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GO

RDO

N W

ELL -

KEA

TS IS

LAN

D. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$2

56

9 G

J$

25

60

.1 t

0.1

t2

,39

0kW

h9

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

K ATH

ERIN

E LA

KE P

OTA

BLE W

ELL.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$1

2,3

03

48

8 G

J$

12

,30

33

.0 t

3.0

t1

35

,48

0kW

h4

88

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

L AN

GD

ALE

WEL

L. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$2

,12

99

2 G

J$

2,1

29

0.6

t0

.6 t

25

,44

0kW

h9

2G

JE

lectr

icity

S OA

MES

WEL

L. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

Pota

ble

Wat

er D

eep

Wel

l Sub

tota

l1

,18

0 G

J$

26

,66

97

.2 t

$2

6,6

69

32

7,9

08

kW

hE

lectr

icity

1,1

80

GJ

7.2

t

Pota

ble

Wat

er P

ump

Sta

tion

$1

08

2 G

J$

10

80

.0 t

0.0

t5

40

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

CA

LETA

PU

MP S

TATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$1

,56

86

7 G

J$

1,5

68

0.4

t0

.4 t

18

,68

5kW

h6

7G

JE

lectr

icity

CO

VE C

AY

PUM

P STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

720

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

72

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

$1

1,4

82

47

6 G

J$

11

,48

22

.9 t

2.9

t1

32

,11

6kW

h4

76

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

GA

RDEN

BA

Y W

ATE

RWO

RKS D

IST.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$1

,35

75

8 G

J$

1,3

57

0.4

t0

.4 t

15

,99

1kW

h5

8G

JE

lectr

icity

GRA

NTH

AM

S LA

ND

ING

PU

MP S

TATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$9

14

39

GJ

$9

14

0.2

t0

.2 t

10

,82

6kW

h3

9G

JE

lectr

icity

HO

TEL L

AKE

PU

MP S

TATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$5

41

22

GJ

$5

41

0.1

t0

.1 t

5,9

94

kW

h2

2G

JE

lectr

icity

MT.

RIC

HA

RDSO

N P

UM

P STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$1

,26

15

3 G

J$

1,2

61

0.3

t0

.3 t

14

,81

2kW

h5

3G

JE

lectr

icity

ORC

A R

OA

D P

UM

P STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$7

,80

83

42

GJ

$7

,80

82

.1 t

2.1

t9

5,0

08

kW

h3

42

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

P AYN

E RD

PU

MP S

TATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$3

,23

81

41

GJ

$3

,23

80

.9 t

0.9

t3

9,1

10

kW

h1

41

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

P AYN

E RD

PU

MP S

TATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$4

,44

01

76

GJ

$4

,44

01

.1 t

1.1

t4

8,8

09

kW

h1

76

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

R OBE

RTS C

REEK

PU

MP S

TATI

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$8

,03

83

54

GJ

$8

,03

82

.2 t

2.2

t9

8,3

92

kW

h3

54

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S AN

DY

HO

OK

PUM

P STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$5

,49

92

00

GJ

$5

,49

91

.2 t

1.2

t5

5,5

87

kW

h2

00

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

S ELM

A P

UM

P STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$1

,32

45

9 G

J$

1,3

24

0.4

t0

.4 t

16

,49

1kW

h5

9G

JE

lectr

icity

S ELM

A P

UM

P STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

Pota

ble

Wat

er P

ump

Stat

ion

Subt

otal

1,9

89

GJ

$4

7,5

77

12

.2 t

$4

7,5

77

55

2,3

62

kW

hE

lectr

icity

1,9

89

GJ

12

.2 t

Pota

ble

Wat

er R

eser

voir

$8

61

GJ

$8

60

.0 t

0.0

t1

96

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

L EE R

OA

D R

ESER

VOIR

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

$6

60

GJ

$6

60

.0 t

0.0

t3

2kW

h0

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

R EED

RO

AD

RES

ERVO

IR. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$7

71

GJ

$7

70

.0 t

0.0

t1

42

kW

h1

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

TRO

UT L

AKE

RES

ERVO

IR. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$1

03

2 G

J$

10

30

.0 t

0.0

t4

23

kW

h2

GJ

Ele

ctr

icity

WA

TER

TOW

ER K

EITH

RD

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 375

Pota

ble

Wat

er R

eser

voir

Subt

otal

3 G

J$

33

10

.0 t

$3

31

79

3kW

hE

lectr

icity

3G

J0

.0 t

Pota

ble

Wat

er T

reat

men

t

$4

0,0

47

$1

2,2

59

3,2

83

GJ

$5

2,3

06

51

.6 t

15

.8 t

35

.8 t

71

7,3

71

kW

h

70

0G

J

2,5

83

GJ

70

0G

JN

atu

ralG

as

Ele

ctr

icity

CH

APM

AN

CRE

EK W

ATE

R TR

EATM

ENT P

LAN

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

79

Pota

ble

Wat

er T

reat

men

t Sub

tota

l3

,28

3 G

J$

52

,30

65

1.6

t$

40

,04

77

17

,37

1kW

hE

lectr

icity

2,5

83

GJ

15

.8 t

$1

2,2

59

70

0G

JN

atu

ralG

as

70

0G

J3

5.8

t

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

820

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

73

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

Rech

lori

nati

on S

tati

on

$1

,38

85

9 G

J$

1,3

88

0.4

t0

.4 t

16

,46

9kW

h5

9G

JE

lectr

icity

R EC

HLO

RIN

ATI

ON

STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

$6

5$

65

0.0

tRE

DRO

OFF

S RO

AD

STA

TIO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

75

Rech

lorin

atio

n St

atio

n Su

btot

al5

9 G

J$

1,4

53

0.4

t$

1,4

53

16

,46

9kW

hE

lectr

icity

59

GJ

0.4

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y8

,05

1 G

J$

16

2,7

54

80

.7 t

$1

50

,49

52

,04

1,8

77

kW

hE

lectr

icity

7,3

51

GJ

44

.9 t

$1

2,2

59

70

0G

JN

atu

ral

Ga

s7

00

GJ

35

.8 t

Wat

er &

Was

tew

ater

Sub

tota

l

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s

$2

,26

07

3 G

J$

2,2

60

5.3

t5

.3 t

1,8

92

litre

s7

3G

JD

iese

lF

ue

l20

00 F

350

F ORD

FLA

TDEC

K. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

$3

,42

61

09

GJ

$3

,42

67

.8 t

7.8

t2

,82

4lit

res

10

9G

JD

iese

lF

ue

l20

07 F

350

4 X2

W/ R

EAD

ING

SER

VIC

E BO

DY.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

$4

,04

91

31

GJ

$4

,04

99

.4 t

9.4

t3

,39

7lit

res

13

1G

JD

iese

lF

ue

l20

07 F

350

4 X4

EXTE

ND

ED C

AB

W/ I

TB F

LAT D

ECK.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

$4

,96

41

60

GJ

$4

,96

41

1.5

t1

1.5

t4

,12

9lit

res

16

0G

JD

iese

lF

ue

l20

08 F

450

S UPE

RDU

TY. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

$8

14

27

GJ

$8

14

2.0

t2

.0 t

70

7lit

res

27

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

l94

FO

RD F

700

4TO

N. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

$3

,91

71

29

GJ

$3

,91

79

.3 t

9.3

t3

,33

5lit

res

12

9G

JD

iese

lF

ue

l95

I NTL

. 5-T

ON

DU

MP.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

$3

,04

69

9 G

J$

3,0

46

7.1

t7

.1 t

2,5

52

litre

s9

9G

JD

iese

lF

ue

l99

FO

RD F

350.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

Die

sel F

uel M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s Su

btot

al7

29

GJ

$2

2,4

76

52

.4 t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

22

,47

61

8,8

36

litre

s7

29

GJ

52

.4 t

Die

sel F

uel O

ff R

oad

Veh

icle

s &

Eq

uip

men

t

$8

,41

92

79

GJ

$8

,41

92

0.0

t2

0.0

t7

,21

1lit

res

27

9G

JD

iese

lF

ue

lJ O

HN

DEE

RE B

AC

KHO

E. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

Die

sel F

uel O

ff R

oad

Vehi

cles

& E

quip

men

t Sub

tota

l2

79

GJ

$8

,41

92

0.0

tD

iese

lF

ue

l$

8,4

19

7,2

11

litre

s2

79

GJ

20

.0 t

Gas

olin

e M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s &

Van

s

$9

,64

82

92

GJ

$9

,64

82

1.0

t2

1.0

t8

,41

7lit

res

29

2G

JG

aso

line

2004

FO

RD F

350.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

$2

25

7 G

J$

22

50

.5 t

0.5

t1

97

litre

s7

GJ

Ga

so

line

2008

F35

0 4 X

4 W

ITH

SER

VIC

E BO

DY.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 366

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 1

920

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

74

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype

$9

,93

32

96

GJ

$9

,93

32

1.3

t2

1.3

t8

,53

9lit

res

29

6G

JG

aso

line

F350

SBO

DY.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

Gas

olin

e M

ediu

m to

Hea

vy T

ruck

s &

Van

s Su

btot

al5

95

GJ

$1

9,8

07

42

.8 t

Ga

so

line

$1

9,8

07

17

,15

3lit

res

59

5G

J4

2.8

t

Gas

olin

e Pa

ssen

ger C

ars

$8

69

26

GJ

$8

69

1.8

t1

.8 t

73

9lit

res

26

GJ

Ga

so

line

2003

GEO

TRA

CKE

R. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

$4

14

12

GJ

$4

14

0.9

t0

.9 t

35

2lit

res

12

GJ

Ga

so

line

95 G

EO T

RAC

KER.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

Gas

olin

e Pa

ssen

ger C

ars

Subt

otal

38

GJ

$1

,28

32

.7 t

Ga

so

line

$1

,28

31

,09

1lit

res

38

GJ

2.7

t

Gen

erat

or S

tati

on

$6

05

18

GJ

$6

05

1.3

t1

.3 t

46

5lit

res

18

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

lF I

ELD

RO

AD

GEN

ERA

TOR.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 114

$9

83

GJ

$9

80

.2 t

0.2

t8

1lit

res

3G

JG

aso

line

NO

RTH

PEN

DER

HA

RBO

UR

WA

TER

SYST

EM .

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 365

$5

,31

21

58

GJ

$5

,31

21

1.4

t1

1.4

t

Inclu

de

s a

n u

nd

isclo

se

d v

olu

me

of

fue

l fo

r a

ve

hic

le

4,0

86

litre

s1

58

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

lN

ORT

H P

END

ER H

ARB

OU

R W

ATE

R SY

STEM

AN

D G

ENER

ATO

R. C

OST

CEN

TRE

365

$1

22

3 G

J$

12

20

.2 t

0.2

t8

9lit

res

3G

JD

iese

lF

ue

lS E

LMA S

IMPS

ON

MA

XW

ELL G

ENSE

T. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

$2

,62

5

$4

,03

61

90

GJ

$6

,66

11

3.7

t5

.5 t

8.2

t

Inclu

de

s a

n u

nd

isclo

se

d v

olu

me

of

fue

l fo

r a

ve

hic

le

2,2

06

litre

s

2,9

46

litre

s

76

GJ

11

4G

JG

aso

line

Die

se

lF

ue

l

S OU

TH P

END

ER H

ARB

OU

R W

ATE

R W

ORK

S. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

66

$1

,42

24

2 G

J$

1,4

22

3.0

t3

.0 t

1,0

94

litre

s4

2G

JD

iese

lF

ue

lW

ATE

R TR

EATM

ENT P

LAN

T GEN

ERA

TOR.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

Gen

erat

or S

tatio

n Su

btot

al4

15

GJ

$1

4,2

20

29

.8 t

Ga

so

line

$2

,72

32

,28

7lit

res

79

GJ

5.7

t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

11

,49

78

,68

0lit

res

33

6G

J2

4.1

t

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UV

s

$2

,19

86

5 G

J$

2,1

98

4.7

t4

.7 t

1,8

86

litre

s6

5G

JG

aso

line

2000

FO

RD R

AN

GER

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

$2

,39

67

3 G

J$

2,3

96

5.2

t5

.2 t

2,1

00

litre

s7

3G

JG

aso

line

2002

F15

0 4 X

2 FO

RD. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

$1

,88

25

6 G

J$

1,8

82

4.1

t4

.1 t

1,6

22

litre

s5

6G

JG

aso

line

2008

FO

RD R

AN

GER

P/U

P W/ S

ERVI

CE B

OD

Y. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

$1

,99

36

1 G

J$

1,9

93

4.4

t4

.4 t

1,7

51

litre

s6

1G

JG

aso

line

2008

FO

RD R

AN

GER

P/U

P W/ S

ERVI

CE B

OD

Y. C

OST

CEN

TRE 3

70

$6

92

23

GJ

$6

92

1.6

t1

.6 t

58

9lit

res

23

GJ

Die

se

lF

ue

l97

FO

RD 3

/4 T

ON

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 365

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 2

020

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

75

Cor

pora

te E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y: 2

008

Suns

hine

Coa

st R

egio

nal D

istr

ict

CO

2eC

osts

Ener

gyC

onsu

mpt

ion

Ener

gyC

osts

CO

2eTy

peA

ccou

nt &

Add

ress

Acc

ount

Sub

tota

lA

ccou

nt C

onsu

mpt

ion

& C

osts

by

Ener

gy T

ype $3

40

10

GJ

$3

40

0.7

t0

.7 t

29

0lit

res

10

GJ

Ga

so

line

F ORD

ESC

APE

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

$2

,96

48

9 G

J$

2,9

64

6.4

t6

.4 t

2,5

82

litre

s8

9G

JG

aso

line

R AN

GER

4X4

2003

. CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

Ligh

t Tru

cks,

Van

s, a

nd S

UVs

Sub

tota

l3

77

GJ

$1

2,4

65

27

.2 t

Ga

so

line

$1

1,7

72

10

,23

1lit

res

35

5G

J2

5.6

t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

69

25

89

litre

s2

3G

J1

.6 t

Misc.

$1

,26

33

8 G

J$

1,2

63

2.7

t2

.7 t

1,1

01

litre

s3

8G

JG

aso

line

WO

RKS M

ISC

ELLA

NEO

US.

CO

ST C

ENTR

E 370

Mis

c. S

ubto

tal

38

GJ

$1

,26

32

.7 t

Ga

so

line

$1

,26

31

,10

1lit

res

38

GJ

2.7

t

Co

nsu

mptio

nC

O e 2

Co

sts

En

erg

y2

,47

0 G

J$

79

,93

21

77

.7 t

Ga

so

line

$3

6,8

49

31

,86

4lit

res

1,1

04

GJ

79

.6 t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

43

,08

43

5,3

17

litre

s1

,36

6G

J9

8.2

t

Vehi

cle

Flee

t Sub

tota

l

Co

nsu

mptio

nTo

tal

CO

e 2C

osts

En

erg

y

Ma

ss

Vo

lum

e

9,2

38

52

,23

0 G

J$

98

8,5

69

1,8

05

.7 t

$4

96

,47

67

,09

6,3

44

kW

hE

lectr

icity

25

,54

7G

J1

56

.1 t

$2

85

,07

02

0,2

51

GJ

Na

tura

lG

as

20

,25

1G

J1

,03

5.8

t

$1

,90

11

,58

4lit

res

61

GJ

4.5

tF

ue

lOil

Ga

so

line

$1

08

,47

39

4,4

68

litre

s3

,27

4G

J2

35

.9 t

Die

se

lF

ue

l$

84

,97

27

0,5

11

litre

s2

,72

7G

J1

96

.0 t

So

lidW

aste

1,9

50

cu

. yd

s2

92

.43

t1

55

.0 t

Pro

pa

ne

litre

s2

34

$7

,39

0G

J1

4.2

t

Pro

pa

ne

5,3

58

litre

s1

36

$4

,28

6G

J8

.1 t

Mb

l

Stn

ry

CO

e 2

Type

28/0

6/20

09Pa

ge 2

120

08 E

nerg

y &

Gre

enho

use

Gas

Em

issi

ons

Inve

ntor

y

Hyl

a En

viro

nmen

tal S

ervi

ces

Ltd.

, 169

Asp

enw

ood

Driv

e, P

ort M

oody

, BC

V3H

5A

5 rh

ayco

ck@

hesl

td.c

a M

: 604

.469

.291

0 F

: 604

.469

.575

3

SUN

SHIN

E C

OA

ST R

EGIO

NA

L D

ISTR

ICT

CO

RPO

RATE

EN

ERG

Y A

ND

EM

ISSI

ON

S PL

AN

200

9

76

CORPORATE ENERGY & EMISSIONS PLAN 2009

Documents

Transcript of CORPORATE ENERGY & EMISSIONS PLAN 2009