Corpo digest

2
Red Line Trans. vs. Rural Transit GR No. 41570 Sept. 6, 1934 Facts: This is a petition for review of an order of the Public Service Commission granting to the Rural Transit Company, Ltd., a certificate of public convenience to operate a transportation service between Ilagan in the Province of Isabela and Tuguegarao in the Province of Cagayan, and additional trips in its existing express service between Manila Tuguegarao. On June 4, 1932, Rural Transit filed an application for certification of a new service between Tuguegarao and Ilagan with the Public Company Service Commission (PSC), since the present service is not sufficient Rural Transit further stated that it is a holder of a certificate of public convenience to operate a passenger bus service between Manila and Tuguegarao Red Line opposed said application, arguing that they already hold a certificate of public convenience for Tuguegarao and Ilagan, and is rendering adequate service. They also argued that granting Rural Transit’s application would constitute a ruinous competition over said route On Dec. 21, 1932, Public Service Commission approved Rural Transit’s application, with the condition that "all the other terms and conditions of the various certificates of public convenience of the herein applicant and herein incorpor ated are made a part hereof." Issue: Can the Public Service Commission authorize a corporation to assume the name of another corporation as a trade name? Ruling: NO. The Rural Transit Company, Ltd., and the Bachrach Motor Co., Inc., are Philippine corporations and the very law of their creation and continued existence requires each to adopt and certify a distinctive name The incorporators "constitute a body politic and corporate under the name stated in the certificate ." A corporation has the power " of succession by its corporate name ." It is essential to its existence and cannot change its name except in the manner provided by the statute. By that name alone is it authorized to transact business.

description

Corpo digest

Transcript of Corpo digest

Red Line Trans. vs. Rural TransitGR No. 41570 Sept. 6, 1934

Facts:This is apetition for review of an order of the Public Service Commission granting to the Rural Transit Company, Ltd., a certificate of public convenience to operate a transportation service between Ilagan in the Province of Isabela and Tuguegarao in the Province of Cagayan, and additional trips in its existing express service between Manila Tuguegarao. On June 4, 1932, Rural Transit filed an application for certification of a new service between Tuguegarao and Ilagan with the Public Company Service Commission (PSC), since the present service is not sufficient Rural Transit further stated that it is a holder of a certificate of public convenience to operate a passenger bus service between Manila and Tuguegarao Red Line opposed said application, arguing that they already hold a certificate of public convenience for Tuguegarao and Ilagan, and is rendering adequate service. They also argued that granting Rural Transits application would constitute a ruinous competition over said route On Dec. 21, 1932, Public Service Commission approved Rural Transits application, with the condition that "all the other terms and conditions of the various certificates of public convenience of the herein applicant and herein incorporated are made a part hereof."

Issue:Can the Public Service Commission authorize a corporation to assume the name of another corporation as a trade name?

Ruling: NO. The Rural Transit Company, Ltd., and the Bachrach Motor Co., Inc., are Philippine corporations and the very law of their creation and continued existence requires each to adopt and certify a distinctive name The incorporators "constitute a body politic and corporateunder the name stated in the certificate." A corporation has the power "of succession by its corporate name." It is essential to its existence and cannot change its name except in the manner provided by the statute. By that name alone is it authorized to transact business.

The law gives a corporation no express or implied authority to assume another name that is unappropriated: still less that of another corporation, which is expressly set apart for it and protected by the law. If any corporation could assume at pleasure as an unregistered trade name the name of another corporation, this practice would result in confusion and open the door to frauds and evasions and difficulties of administration and supervision.