Cornerstone Experience: Building First Year Students’ Foundation for Success Presented at the 2014...
-
Upload
tyler-thomas -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Cornerstone Experience: Building First Year Students’ Foundation for Success Presented at the 2014...
Cornerstone Experience: Building First Year Students’ Foundation for Success
Presented at the 2014 College Readiness Summit
Eileen DeLuca, Ph.D.Assistant Vice President, Academic Affairs
Florida SouthWestern State College
Florida SouthWestern State College
Open access, baccalaureate-granting state college. 19 Associate Degrees 10 Bachelors Degrees 10 Certificate Programs (computer science, health
professions, fire science, EMT, etc.)
Residence Hall on main campus
Two Charter Collegiate High Schools (Lee Campus, Charlotte Campus)
Five-county service district comprises three counties along Florida’s southwestern Gulf coast, and two inland counties.
Service Area for FSW
FSW Students: Fall 2013
Headcount – 15,800
Full-Time – 33.9%; Part-Time – 66.1%
65.4% of students are 24 years old or younger 34.6% of students are over the age of 24
Female – 60.1%; Male – 39.9% 58.2% White 26.7% Hispanic/Latino 12.4% African American 2.7% other minorities
Achieving the Dream Risk Factor Data: AY 2011-2012
Source: FSW Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness (2012). Focal Point.
Five risk factors from the July 2009 Achieving the Dream report (July/August 2009, Data Notes) were applied to FSW FTIC students.
Achieving the Dream Risk Factor Data: AY 2011-2012
Source: FSW Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness (2012). Focal Point.
FSW College Faculty 180 Full-time Faculty
376 Adjunct Faculty
FSW Faculty Federation Union (Chapter of United Faculty of Florida)
Foundations of Excellence: Where We Began
Fall 2008 – Identification of critical student learning issues
2009-2010 – Foundations of Excellence Study (FoE) Committees formed for each of the nine dimensions
7 out of 9 committees chaired or co-chaired by faculty (committees composed of 38%-73% faculty)
Approximately 120 faculty and staff participants on all committees
FOE RECOMMENDATIONS
STUDENT LEARNING
STUDENT SUPPORT
ORIENTATION
ASSESSMENT &
EVALUATION
COMMUNICATION
TRAINING & DEVELOPM
ENT
120 FOE RECOMMENDATIONS DIVIDED INTO 6 COMPONENTS
FYE COURSE/QEP
STUDENT LEARNING
STUDENT LEARNING
FIRST YEAR EXPERIENCE COURSE / QUALITY ENHANCEMENT PLAN
Finding a Path-FOE/FYE/QEP 2011-Steering Committee (QEP/FYE) Co-chaired by a Faculty Member
and Administrator
Six-subcommittees with faculty participants on all committees: Student Learning (with a Lead Faculty identified) Student Support Training and Development Orientation Communication Evaluation and Assessment
Spring 2012 – Initial implementation Cornerstone Experience Course.
Fall 2012-Full implementation of the Cornerstone Experience Course and FYE Program.
The Cornerstone Experience
Student Learning Outcomes based on Frameworks
Critical Thinking assists students in developing the skills of analysis and evaluation to improve thinking and guide attitudes and behavior. Apply the intellectual traits, standards, and elements of reasoning
in the context of their personal and academic lives Demonstrate intellectual rigor and problem-solving skills by
analyzing and evaluating information, generating ideas, and resolving issues
Explore how background experiences impact their values and assumptions and explain how they influence personal relationships
Applied Learning enables students to reinforce skills learned in Cornerstone Experience by applying them in other classes and settings. Enhance their awareness of the larger diverse community both
inside and outside Edison State College Apply one or more skills learned in the FYE course to other
academic endeavors
Student Learning Outcomes based on Frameworks (continued)
Relevancy promotes student engagement in learning activities that connect course content to each student’s own academic and career objectives. Through purposeful connections and meaningful experiences, students will be guided toward successful completion of educational goals. Construct a plan for a successful path into and through completion of a
degree or certificate Evaluate student-to-student and student-to-faculty interactions, and
reflect on their relationship to academic, career, and social development Reflect on the General Education competencies at Edison State College and
articulate their application to academic and career goalsSuccess Strategies help students achieve their personal and educational goals, acquire skills and knowledge, become more mature in their thinking, assume greater responsibility for their own lives and learning, and develop understanding of diversity and multiculturalism in preparation for the professional world. Develop strategies for effective written and verbal communication, use of
technology, listening, reading, critical thinking and reasoning Demonstrate independence and self-efficacy through effective personal
management, use of college resources and the development of positive relationships with peers, staff and faculty
QEP Goal and Program Outcomes
The primary goal of Edison State College’s QEP is:
to enable first-time-in-college students to become self-reliant learners imbued with critical thinking skills.
1. The QEP will facilitate an increase in student retention rates, rates of persistence, and graduation rates.
2. The QEP will foster increased rates of student satisfaction and student engagement.
3. Faculty will apply newly obtained knowledge to their practices to promote critical thinking and enhance the likelihood of success for first-year students.
4. Staff and administrators will apply practices that promote critical thinking and success to their interactions with first-year students.
.
Cornerstone Experience Five-Year Implementation Timeline
Cornerstone ExperienceImplementation Timeline 2012 – 2017Initial ImplementationBeginning Spring 2012
All FTIC degree-seeking students testing into 2 or more developmental courses will be required to enroll in Cornerstone Experience course
Open sections for students electing to enroll in an SLS course
YEAR 12012 - 2013
All FTIC degree-seeking students testing into 2 or more developmental courses will be required to enroll in Cornerstone Experience course
YEAR 2 2013 – 2014
All FTIC degree-seeking students testing into any number of developmental courses will be required to enroll in Cornerstone Experience course
YEAR 32014 - 2015
All FTIC degree-seeking students will be required to enroll in and successfully complete Cornerstone Experience course
YEAR 42015 – 2016
All FTIC degree-seeking students will be required to enroll in and successfully complete Cornerstone Experience course
YEAR 5 2016 - 2017
All FTIC degree-seeking students will be required to enroll in and successfully complete Cornerstone Experience course
Faculty Teaching CornerstoneCourse
Staff and Administrator Training
Required Modules Through TLC:
•QEP Course Overview and Objectives•QEP Course Assignments and•Assessments•Universal Design Strategies •Understanding the First-Year Student •Diversity on the College Campus and Beyond•The Way I Learn•Introduction to College Services, Programs, Support•Constructivist Pedagogy and the Student-Centered Classroom•Critical Thinking•Discipline Paradigms and Career Goals
Required Modules Through TLC:
•QEP Course Overview and Objectives•Understanding the First-Year Student•Diversity on the College Campus and Beyond•Introduction to College Services, Programs, Support•Critical Thinking
Training Module Completers
As of August 2014, 140 faculty and staff have completed the ten Cornerstone Instructor Training Modules.
602 faculty, staff and administrators have attended one or more QEP Cornerstone Module.
All departments are encouraged to set training completion goals in the 2014-2015 Unit Plans.
Additional In-House Training Framework
Understanding the First Year Student
This annual summer conference is held at FSW and open to all faculty, staff and
administrators. The content is similar to the module for teaching faculty, but
presented as a half or full-day seminar and conducted by a nationally-known
expert.
Critical
Thinking
Applied
Learning
Relevancy
Success
Strategies
Critical Thinking
This annual summer conference is held at FSW and is open to all faculty, staff
and administrators. The content is similar to the module for teaching faculty,
but presented as a one or two-day seminar and conducted by a nationally-
known expert.
Critical
Thinking
Communities of Practice
Communities of Practice are open to participation by all faculty, staff and
administrators for SLS 1515 Cornerstone Experience and occur twice a month
throughout the academic year.
Critical
Thinking
Applied
Learning
Relevancy
Success
Strategies
Professional Conferences Framework
International Critical Thinking Conference
A contingent of faculty and QEP administrators attend this
conference annually.
Critical Thinking
Annual Conference on the First-Year Experience
A contingent of faculty and appropriate staff attend this
conference annually.
Critical Thinking
Applied Learning
Relevancy
Success Strategies
SLS 1515 Enrollment
Campus
Semester
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Summer 2013
Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Summer 2014
Fall 2014
Sections Enrollment Sections Enrollment Sections Enrollment Sections Enrollment Sections Enrollment Sections Enrollment Sections Enrollment
Charlotte 3 43 1 29 1 13 5 113 4 74 1 9 9 210
Collier 6 124 4 64 2 30 13 347 10 157 3 54 26 608
Hendry/ Glades 1 15 1 19 1 19 2 52 2 40 1 11 5 94
Lee 20 430 11 191 7 138 34 902 20 379 8 160 68 1619
College Total 30 612 17 303 11 200 54 1414 36 650 13 234 108 2531
SLS 1515 Section Coverage
SemesterFall
2012Spring
2013Summer
2013Fall
2013Spring
2014Summer
2014Fall
2014
CampusTotal # of Sections
% Taught by full-time faculty or staff
Total # of Sections
% Taught by full-time faculty or staff
Total # of Sections
% Taught by full-time faculty or staff
Total # of Sections
% Taught by full-time faculty or staff
Total # of Sections
% Taught by full-time faculty or staff
Total # of Sections
% Taught by full-time faculty or staff
Total # of Sections
% Taught by full-time faculty or staff
College Total 30 50% 17 65% 11 18.% 55 65% 37 84% 13 69% 108 74%
Course Grades Based on
Critical Thinking Journal 25%Group Presentation 15% FSW GPS (Go, Picture, Scribe) 15%Final Essay Assignment 25%Attendance and In-Class Assignments 20%
Peer Architects are student leaders who help students with their transition to Florida SouthWestern State College. Each Peer Architect will act as a mentor for first-year students. Peer Architects are assigned to a specific section of the Cornerstone Experience Class (SLS 1515), have office hours in the First Year Experience (FYE) office, and put on workshops throughout the semester specifically geared towards enhancing a first year student’s overall experience.
Navigating the Path: Peer Support
Showcasing the Talent
Faculty-Driven Committee Work
• Implementation Team
• Advisory Committee
Faculty-Driven Committee Work
• Orientation, Registration, Advising Committee
• Assessment Committee
• Cornerstone Curriculum Committee
Faculty-Driven Committee Work
• Marketing Committee
• Early Alert Committee
Faculty-Driven Committee Work
• Marketing Committee
• Early Alert Committee
Faculty-Driven Committee Work
• FYE Programming Committee
• Training and Development Committee
Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Success Within course completion rates
Term-to-term and Year-to-year retention reports
Cohort graduation reports.
Survey of Entering Student Engagement (SENSE) weighted scores
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) weighted scores
Mean scores on the Student Instructional Report (SIR II)
Critical Thinking Journal assessment scored with the faculty-designed rubric
Quantitative and Qualitative Measures of Success
Results of the Final Essay Assignment scored with the faculty-designed rubric
Pre and Post-test scores on the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI)
Pre and post-test scores on the Scores Smarter Measure Learning Readiness Indicator
Results of the Success Strategies presentation scored with the faculty-designed rubric
Student self-report on the Success Strategies Survey
Qualitative data from student focus group sessions
Professional Development Surveys completed by faculty, staff and administrators
View Annual Reports
http://www.fsw.edu/fye/qep
Success Strategies SurveyTable 1 Percentage of Respondents Reporting Utilization of Cognitive and Goal Attainment Strategies
Support ServiceFall
2012Spring
2013Summer
2013Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Summer 2014
Academic Success Centers 92.5% 94.6% 82.0% 85.0% 86.76% 96.30%
Career Services 47.5% 55.4% 54.0% 32.8% 48.53% 70.37%
Peer Mentoring 40.0% 60.7% 58.0% 47.2% * *
Peer Tutoring 27.5% 37.5% 34.0% 22.2% 33.82% 48.15%
FYE Staff or Academic Coaching 40.0% 75.0% 62.0% 49.4% * *
Advising Staff 55.0% 69.6% 76.0% 63.9% 79.41% 81.48%
Financial Aid Staff 50.0% 60.7% 72.0% 48.3% 69.12% 77.78%
Library Staff 60.0% 67.9% 66.0% 48.3% 58.82% 81.48%
New Student Programs * * * * 72.06% 88.89%
*Item did not appear on survey. The "New Student Programs" category was added in spring 2014 and replaced two categories that were formerly measured separately, "Peer Mentoring" and "FYE Staff or Academic Coaching."
Success Strategies Survey
Table 2Percentage of Respondents Reporting Participation in Campus Engagement Activities
Activity TypeFall 2012
Spring 2013
Summer 2013
Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Summer 2014
FYE Activities 38.2% 78.9% 68.8% 74.1% 80.30% 92.59%
Student Life Activities 67.6% 61.4% 64.6% 74.1% 69.18% 55.56%
Academic Success and FYE Workshops 44.1% 63.2% 89.6% 69.3% 89.39% 85.19%
Clubs 26.5% 29.8% 10.4% 16.9% 15.15% 14.81%
Service Saturday 35.3% 26.3% 0.0% 15.7% 27.27% 18.52%
Intramural sports 5.9% 7.0% 4.2% 4.2% 4.55% 11.11%
Career Events 58.8% 29.8% 6.3% 21.1% 30.30% 25.93%Lighthouse Commons Activities or Events 11.8% 21.1% 20.8% 9.6% 12.12% 25.93%
Success Strategies Survey
Table 3Percentage of Respondents Reporting Improvement in Goal Attainment Strategies
Success StrategyFall
2012Spring
2013Summer
2013Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Summer 2014
Time Management 87.5% 85.2% 84.1% 77.1% 80.3% 80.77%
Goal Setting 87.5% 87.0% 84.1% 77.6% 83.1% 80.77%
Organizational Skills 82.1% 85.2% 81.8% 75.1% 81.8% 76.92%
Persistence 82.5% 83.3% 84.1% 73.5% 81.5% 80.77%
Avoiding activities and behaviors that may make me unsuccessful 82.5% 70.4% 72.7% 70.6% 81.5% 76.92%
Success Strategies Survey
Table 4Percentage of Respondents Reporting Improvement in Communication Strategies
Success StrategyFall
2012Spring
2013Summer
2013Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Summer 2014
Communication and Listening Skills 76.9% 83.3% 86.4% 77.7% 83.6% 84.61%
Considering opinions different from my own 87.2% 81.5% 86.4% 82.1% 84.8% 80.77%
Relating to people that are different from me * * 86.4% 73.7% 84.8% 84.62%
Working in a small group to complete a task or assignment * * 97.4% 72.5% 82.1% 88.46%
Forming a social network with other students * * 97.4% 64.7% 79.1% 73.08%
*Item did not appear on survey.
Success Strategies SurveyTable 5
Percentage of Respondents Reporting Application of Communication, Goal Attainment, and Cognitive Strategies
Success StrategyFall
2012Spring
2013Summer
2013Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Summer 2014
Note-taking 74.4% 80.8% 81.8% 75.2% 85.0% 75.00%
Critical Thinking 84.6% 86.5% 86.4% 81.2% 86.7% 83.33%
Study Skills 71.8% 76.9% 88.6% 81.2% 86.7% 91.67%
Creating a schedule 69.2% 78.8% 90.9% 72.5% 76.7% 83.33%
Creating a budget 56.4% 59.6% 70.5% 51.7% 61.7% 70.83%
Test-taking strategies 79.5% 86.5% 72.7% 73.2% 78.3% 87.50%
Forming study groups 43.6% 46.2% 68.2% 42.3% 50.0% 62.50%
Success Strategies Survey
Table 6Percentage of Students Reporting Application of Communication and Goal Attainment Strategies
Success StrategyFall
2012Spring
2013Summer
2013Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Summer 2014
Choosing a major 69.2% 56.9% 83.7% 63.3% 66.1% 76.00%
Choosing a career goal 59.0% 68.6% 88.4% 64.6% 57.8% 84.00%
Forming relationships 66.7% 72.5% 76.7% 57.1% 69.4% 64.00%
Changing study habits 79.5% 80.4% 81.4% 72.1% 74.2% 88.00%
Communicating with others 71.8% 80.4% 83.7% 68.7% 83.9% 80.00%Researching professors for future classes 56.4% 64.7% 67.4% 61.2% 62.9% 68.00%
Appreciating diversity 61.5% 78.4% 81.4% 65.3% 79.0% 72.00%
Success Strategies Survey
Table 7
Percentage of Respondents Reporting Substantial Improvement in Goal Attainment, Communication, and Cognitive Strategies
Success StrategyFall
2012Spring
2013Summer
2013Fall 2013
Spring 2014
Summer 2014
Arriving to class on time. 5.0% 7.3% 6.3% 6.3% 11.8% 7.69%
Attending class. 10.0% 7.3% 4.2% 6.9% 8.8% 11.54%
Reviewing the course schedule. 10.3% 20.4% 18.8% 12.6% 21.7% 19.23%
Using the calendar or lists. 17.5% 25.9% 25.0% 20.1% 13.2% 26.92%
Working on large projects incrementally 22.5% 27.3% 20.8% 18.3% 29.0% 24.00%
Using small group communication skills. 35.0% 52.9% 25.0% 21.3% 34.9% 38.46%Participating and asking questions when appropriate. 22.5% 52.9% 26.7% 20.6% 35.8% 15.38%
Forming a relationship with other students. 20.0% 24.1% 22.2% 18.3% 29.9% 19.23%Meeting with the professor outside of class for help. 10.3% 27.8% 20.0% 21.9% 36.4% 23.08%
Thinking critically about texts and lectures. 35.9% 38.9% 20.0% 19.0% 40.3% 30.77%
Honors Sections
Fall 2014
Spring 2015
Linked Courses
SLS 1515 Linked Courses
Fall 2014 SLS 1515 (13190) “linked” to BSC 1010 (21835) and 1010L (21841)
Spring 2015
SLS 1515 (22251) “linked” to BSC 1010 (21835) and 1010L (21841)
Spring 2014 Career Interest by Meta-Major
Meta-Major Declaration Fall 2014
Industry/Manufacturing and Construction
Public Safety
Education
Social and Behavioral Sciencs and Human Sciences
Arts, Humanities, Communication, and Design
Business
Science, Technology, Engineering & Math
Health Science
0.00% 5.00% 10.00% 15.00% 20.00% 25.00% 30.00% 35.00%
Critical Thinking in Careers
QUESTIONS?
Connect with the Cornerstone Experience
http://www.fsw.edu/fye/contact
ReferencesAllen, J., & Robbins, S. B. (2008). Prediction of college major persistence based on vocational
interests, academic preparation, and first-year academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 49(1), 62-79.
Ash, S. & Clayton, P. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The Power of critical reflection in applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education. Vol. 1, pp. 25 – 48.
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (AAC&U) 2002. Greater expectations: A New vision for learning as a nation foes to college. http://www.greaterexpectations.org/
Barton, A., & Donahue, C. (2009). Multiple assessments of a first-year seminar pilot. The Journal of General Education, 58(4), 259-278.
Charles A. Dana Center, Complete College America, Inc., Education Commission of the States, Jobs for the Future (2012). Core Principles for Transforming Remedial Education: A Joint Statement.
Coughlin, K, and DeLuca, E. (2014). The Impact of a First-Year Experience Course on the
Retention and Academic Achievement of Students with Remedial Needs. Manuscript in preparation.
DeLuca, E. and Coughlin, K. (February 26, 2013). Using Mixed Methods to Assess the Efficacy of
a First-Year Experience Course and Program Presented at the Annual Conference on The
First-Year Experience Orlando, Fla.
Derby, D. C., & Smith, T. (2004). An orientation course and community college retention. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(9), 763-773.
Edison State College. (2012). Cornerstone Experience: Building the Foundation for Success, A Quality Enhancement Plan Prepared for the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Revised-April, 2012
(http://www.edison.edu/assets/pdf/fye/QEP%20FINAL%20with%20Bookmarks.pdf)
Edison State College Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness (2012). Focal Point.
Engberg, M. E., & Mayhew, M. J. (2007). The influence of first-year" success" courses on student learning and democratic outcomes. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 241-258.
Hunter, M. S. (2006). Fostering student learning and success through first-year programs. Peer
Review, 8(3).
Jenkins, D. and Cho, S. (2012). Get With the Program: Accelerating Community College
Students’ Entry into and Completion of Programs of Study. CCR Working Paper No. 32.
Jamelske, E. (2009). Measuring the impact of a university first-year experience program on
student GPA and retention. Higher Education, 57(3), 373-391.
Lang, D. J. (2007). The impact of a first-year experience course on the academic performance, persistence, and graduation rates of first-semester college students at a public research university. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 19(1), 9-25.
Karp, M. M., Hughes, K. L., & O'Gara, L. (2010). An exploration of Tinto's integration framework for community college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 12(1), 69-86.
Miller, J. W., Janz, J. C., & Chen, C. (2007). The retention impact of a first-year seminar on
students with varying pre-college academic performance. Journal of the First-Year
Experience & Students in Transition, 19(1), 47-62.
Murray, J., & Summerlee, A. (2007). The Impact of Problem-Based Learning in an
Interdisciplinary First-Year Program on Student Learning Behaviour. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(3).
Porter, S. R., & Swing, R. L. (2006). Understanding how first-year seminars affect persistence.
Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 89-109.
Potts, G., & Schultz, B. (2008). The freshman seminar and academic success of at-risk students. College Student Journal, 42(2).
Ryan, M. P., & Glenn, P. A. (2004). What Do First-Year Students Need Most: Learning Strategies Instruction or Academic Socialization?. Journal of College Reading & Learning, 34(2).
Tuckman, B. W., & Kennedy, G. J. (2011). Teaching learning strategies to increase success of first-term college students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 79(4), 478-504.