CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

26
CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012

Transcript of CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Page 1: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED

NAR Nursing AssemblySan Antonio

February 2012

Page 2: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Overview

• Context: ICN TB Project

• What are Core Nursing Values?

• Why do we need to revisit them?

Page 3: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

ICN TB/MDR-TB Project• Training for transformation

(TFT) in collaboration with National Nurses Associations

– In 16 countries with high TB/MDR-TB burden

– 1300 nurses trained as trainers

– 56000 nurses and allied health workers have so far received training from these trainers

Page 4: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

ICN TB Project coverage

Page 5: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Essential Elements of TFT

AIMS ELEMENTS

To inspire and motivate using innovative teaching methods

Peer education

Tailored to context and learning needs

Active learning

To promote change in practice as well as in the care environment

People-centredness

Best Practice approach

Empowerment

To develop essential skills for broadening the scope of practice

Critical thinking

Teamwork

Leadership

Page 6: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Challenges Observed• Care starts when pt registered• Overcrowded ‘mixed’ wards• Program focus not patient focus• No system to identify non-attenders• Slow response to non-attenders• Ill-equipped Rx supporters• Lack of medical backup• Distance from hospital to family• Lack of flexibility of clinic times etc

Page 7: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Feedback from nurses• Lack of recognition • Overwhelming workloads • Frustration with defaulters• Lack of time • Fear/stigma• Lack of space• Lack of masks – stigmatizing

solutions• Patients dying for lack of drugs

Page 8: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Positive Observations

• Care • Commitment• Innovation• Skills• Leadership• Management • Tenacity• Autonomy

(hidden)• Success

Page 9: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Impact• Changing attitudes• Better patient

outcomes• Improved HCW

safety

“She taught us to take more time at the beginning with patients – now we have less default”

Kenya evaluation (2010)

Page 10: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Value of Nurse led training

• Colombia 2011

“Reawakens the participant’s identity as a nurse”. Local trainer

• Ethiopia 2010

“Unlike any other training received as it takes account of our nursing practice”. Participants

• Lesotho 2009“This course has reminded me that patients are human beings and not to focus only on the medication”. Participant

Page 11: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

What makes you feel good?

Poor care

Poor outcomes

Low morale

High morale

Good outcomes

Good care

Page 12: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Core Nursing Values

– College of Nursing, South Dakota State University (1)– National League for Nursing (2)– MUSC College of Nursing (3)– Piedmont medical Center (4)

Human dignity (1)Integrity (1, 2)Autonomy (1)Altruism (1)Social justice(1)Caring (2, 3)Integrity (2, 3)Diversity (2, 3)Excellence (2)

Scholarship (3)Lifelong learning (3)Service (3)Creativity (3)Empowerment (3)Collaboration (3)Advocacy (3)Equity (3)Leadership (3, 4)

Page 13: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Core nursing values• Piedmont Medical Center (4)

– reciprocal, respectful relationships– professional image – dedication, selflessness, professional and

personal growth, knowledge and empathy.– nurturing – accountability– education and research – strong nurse to patient relationship – patient advocate

Page 14: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Core Nursing values

• Florence Nightingale:

• “[Nurses] need to put the patient in the best state for nature to cure them”

• ENABLING ENVIRONMENTS– To access care– To make positive health choices

Page 15: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

What do patients and carers value?

• Griffiths et al (2011)– Empathy– Social skills

• Active listening• Good communication

– Patience– Confidence and competence– Honesty– Preparedness to learn from patient– Non-judgemental attitude

Page 16: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Finfgeld-Connett, 2008Expert Nursing

Practice- Clinical

competence- Assessment skills

- Empowerment

Intimate relationships

- Deep involvement

- Sharing thoughts and

feelings

Page 17: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Medicalization of care

• Glamour in medicine/hi-tech • Priority given to diagnosis and cure• Career options as nurses• Compassion and empathy seen as

luxury• Hierarchy of evidence:

– research re care is largely qualitative– research re cure is largely quantitative

Page 18: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Expert Nursing Practice• Clinical competence• Assessment skills• Empowerment

Intimate relation-

shipsInterpersonal

sensitivity

Current picture

• Patient-centredness

• Acceptance• openness • availability

• Deep involvement

• Sharing thoughts and feelings

Page 19: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Which nurse is more skilled?

Page 20: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Why does this matter?

• Taking on menial biomedical tasks and passing on menial care tasks has created a harmful hierarchy in which care is devalued

• Optimum care does not take more time than dealing with impact of lack of care (default, MDR)

• Care embracing all core values (holistic nursing care) seen as a luxury available IF time and resources allow

Page 21: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Core values and nursing care

• Holistic nursing care is complex and multi-faceted

• Simple tasks often require embodied high- level skills

• Requires academic training• Relies on research

Page 22: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Who is best placed to:

• Define what nurses do?• Decide what resources nurse need to

deliver good quality care?• Monitor what nurses do?• Assess the challenges they face?• Solve nursing issues?• Recommend level of investment?

Page 23: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Why revisitCore Nursing Values?

If we cannot articulate our values clearly

we cannot defend them

If we cannot defend them,

others will define them

for us

If we let others define them patients

will suffer

We have a duty as patient

advocates

Page 24: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

What helps or hinders you being the nurse you

want to be?

Page 25: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Tipping the balance….

• How do we make sure patients are in the best state for nature to cure them?

• How do we make sure nurses are in the best state to care?

Page 26: CORE NURSING VALUES REVISITED NAR Nursing Assembly San Antonio February 2012.

Best Practice Guide for Care of Patients with TB

• Developed with nurses from at least 20 different countries

• Defines best practice from real examples

• Published in 2007 – now due for review