Core Curriculum UNCC100: Self and Community: Exploring the ...
Transcript of Core Curriculum UNCC100: Self and Community: Exploring the ...
Page 1 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
Core Curriculum
Semester 2, 2021
UNCC100: Self and Community: Exploring the Anatomy of Modern Society
UNIT OUTLINE
Credit points: 10
Prerequisites: Nil
Incompatibles: PHCC102, PHCC104, UNCC301, UNCC302
Who to contact:
1. Questions about the unit: your Tutor
2. Tutorial selection or clash: [email protected]
3. Educational Inclusion Plan: Faculty Academic Liaison (See your local contact below)
4. Request for Extension: Faculty Academic Liaison (See your local contact below)
5. Request for Special Consideration: Faculty Academic Liaison (See your local contact below)
6. Other enquiry:[email protected]
Faculty Academic Liaison (Education & Arts):
Dr. Amy McPherson ([email protected] )
Faculty Academic Liaison (Health Sciences):
Ms. Laurine Hurley ([email protected] )
Faculty Academic Liaison (Law & Business):
Dr. Sr. Thuy-Linh Nguyen ([email protected] )
Faculty Academic Liaison (Theology & Philosophy):
Dr. Richard Colledge ([email protected] )
Page 2 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
UNIT RATIONALE, DESCRIPTION and AIM
Is polluting our environment done for the common good? Does perpetuating discrimination respect the dignity of the individual?
These are just two examples of the many real challenges we face as individuals functioning as members of our community. They highlight the fact that as humans, we are all individuals, and yet none of us lives in isolation. The African concept of ‘ubuntu’ is helpful here: “I am what I am, because of who we are” - this concept is consistent with the principles of Catholic social thought. Understanding these principles helps us to determine how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and the realisation of the common good may be addressed in our personal and professional lives now and in the future.
This knowledge and understanding is a foundation for the development of the skills needed to be able to propose ways to address challenges where shared responsibility for the common good is not being realized. Given the pervasiveness of such problems in our community, addressing this need is important to our success as a community in realizing a more just world – and each student’s role as an individual who can, and must, be part of that.
In this unit students will first learn what the principles of Catholic Social thought are, then they will build on this knowledge by developing their understanding of how these principles relate to their own life and their own community. Lastly, they will apply this understanding in a reflection on how these principles are relevant to their professional context at a local level.
This unit aims to equip students with knowledge and understanding of the ideas of "self" and "community" as interrelated concepts in the context of nine principles of Catholic Social Thought and develop basic skills to enable them to contribute to a more just society.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
On successful completion of this unit, students should be able to:
1. Describe coherently the principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST), and drawing on these produce a personal commentary that explains how the concepts of 'self' and 'community' are interrelated.
2. Analyse and evaluate the principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST) in order to show how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and the common good may be relevant to the skills and knowledge that they are acquiring in the degree program that they are studying.
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
On successful completion of this unit, students should have developed their ability to:
GA1 demonstrate respect for the dignity of each individual and for human diversity
GA2 recognise your responsibility to the common good, the environment
and society
GA4 think critically and reflectively
GA5 demonstrate values, knowledge, skills and attitudes appropriate tothe discipline and/or profession.
GA8 locate, organise, analyse, synthesise and evaluate information
GA9 demonstrate effective communication in oral and written English language and visual media
Page 3 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
CONTENT Topics will include:
• The Good Life and the Golden Rule • I am because we are; the individual and society • The history and principles of Catholic Social Thought • Human flourishing and the common good
• The common good • Challenges to the common good – freedoms and the common good • Advocacy: personal and professional challenges of Catholic Social Thought
LEARNING AND TEACHING STRATEGY AND RATIONALE In order to support students’ learning experience in ways that are the most engaging, efficient and
effective, the overall teaching strategy used in this unit is a progressive developmental one. This
applies to all the modes of delivery in which this unit is offered. In all modes, the use of the Learning
Management System (LMS) is integral to the delivery of the learning and teaching strategy. The
approach to learning and teaching is via active learning where students are supported through the
provision of learning resources and class activities (either in physical or virtual classrooms) to take
responsibility for their individual learning. Students are expected to participate in the activities
provided either in class or online and to be able to extend their learning through working alongside
other students and undertaking individual research. Students are supported in their learning through
the provision of:
• Learning modules
• Discussion forums and chat rooms
• Guided readings and links to electronic readings
• Self-assessments and other self-directed learning activities.
The progressive and developmental strategy for teaching this unit means that the unit starts simply by
helping students to acquire the content knowledge that they will need to progress. It then builds on
this knowledge by engaging them in activities that will support the development of their understanding
of this content and what it means to them personally. Lastly, it supports students in reflecting on that
meaning in ways that help them to apply their understanding to situations beyond their immediate and
personal context, as they relate to their individual disciplines of study and the profession(s) they may
enter.
The unit is delivered in different modes. Students will only study in one of these modes. The modes
are:
• Intensive mode over a 2-week period in Winter and Summer Terms; and,
• Online mode over a 10-week period in a normal university semester.
The rationale for offering this unit in different modes is that each mode appeals to different people in
different circumstances. The rationale for the face-to-face mode is that this is often preferred by
students because of the personal engagement they experience studying alongside other students. The
rationale for intensive mode is that this is often preferred by students who are working (and cannot
Page 4 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
attend weekly classes), but who still value a face-to-face component. This mode offers learning
activities in ways that allow such people to take blocks of time in which they study intensively, and
which can therefore be fitted around their work commitments. The rationale for the on-line mode in
addition allows participation in learning by those who are unable to participate in any face-to-face
activities, or who simply prefer to work from a remote location.
Face-to-face and intensive modes adopt a ‘flipped classroom’ approach with no lectures. Instead of
lectures, small group classes of one hour’s duration involving ‘active learning’ methods are used. This
means that students’ learning will involve engaging with others, as a participant, not simply listening or
reading. Active learning methods may include but are not limited to the use of facilitated group
discussions; ice-breakers; buzz groups; role play and advocacy. Face-to-face and intensive modes are
both supported by resources that will be available through the university’s Learning Management
System (LMS) known as “LEO” – the Learning Environment Online. Accessing and using these on-line
resources and activities is integral to the student’s study. Accessing and using these on-line resources
and activities is integral to the student’s study
Please note: all classes in Semester 2 are taught remotely, via Zoom (due to the COVID- 19 pandemic).
ASSESSMENT STRATEGY AND RATIONALE
The design of the assessment in this unit is aligned with, and supportive of, the progressive and
developmental learning and teaching strategy. In this way, the assessment tasks scaffold and
support students’ learning in a sequence that is designed to make their learning as simple as
possible by supporting them as much as possible. The assignments relate progressively to their
achievement of the learning outcomes of this unit and the graduate attributes. A variety of
assessment methods is used. Where possible, students will be encouraged to present their work
using multi-media in preparation for presentation styles they may encounter in their professional life.
Some flexibility may be exercised in the options available to students, consistent with achieving the
learning outcomes and meeting the graduate attributes.
In practical terms this means that the assessments start with an “early and low stakes” assessment
which helps students to progress to more complex and more challenging assessments. In this unit,
this sequential support is provided through three assessment tasks so that they get feedback that
supports their learning as they progress throughout the unit.
The same assessment strategy is used regardless of the mode of study.
The first task relates to the foundations of Learning Outcome 1. It is scheduled early in the unit to
encourage students’ early participation in the simple first stages of learning they will need to
progress. It is low stakes to ensure that there is minimal risk to them but is simultaneously of
maximum learning benefit. It will consist of multiple-choice questions.
Page 5 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
Thus, the first assessment is designed as a helpful stepping-stone to the later tasks. Its focus is on
assessing students’ knowledge of the first basic content they will need, that is, their understanding of
the principles of Catholic social thought. The marks for the first assignment are therefore low, but the
value to students’ learning, and their ability to do the later tasks is high. This is designed to
encourage students to participate in the task in a meaningful and engaged way – it helps them to
progress.
The second task is designed to build on the first. Thus, engaging in the first task helps students with
the second. The second task is designed to assess students’ understanding of key concepts and
principles, but in a relatively simple way. It is given more marks than the first task as a reflection of
its value. In this unit, it assesses how the principles they will learn relate to them, and to how self
and community interrelate (the assessment requires them to describe the principles of Catholic
social thought and explain the inter-relationship between “self” and “community”).
Students should refer to their professional practice or degree discipline based in their address of
community for the assessment. This deliberately helps to make the assessment personally and
professionally relevant and valuable. This encourages students to participate in it in a meaningful
way – the unit is designed to help students to learn something that is relevant to themselves and
their chosen discipline.
The final assessment task is designed to build on the first two. Thus, engaging in the first two tasks
helps students with the last. The final task is designed to assess their ability to apply their
understanding of key concepts and principles. It is given more marks than the first and second
tasks as a reflection of its value. This task assesses students’ ability to apply their understanding of
the key principles to the themes of the unit. As with the second task, this helps to make the
assessment personally relevant and valuable to them and helps them to learn something useful.
Study schedule:
For the most up-to-date information, please check your LEO unit and also note advice from your
teaching staff for changes to this schedule.
Please note the schedule below reflects ACU's decision to offer all classes remotely due
to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Page 6 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
Week beginning Topics and class activities Preparation and other important information for classes
1
Monday
August 2
Introduction to UNCC100
Ice breaker
Read Unit Outline (on LEO)
2
Monday
August 9
The history and principles of Catholic Social
Thought (I)
Complete Module 1 in LEO
3
Monday
August 16
The history and principles of Catholic Social
Thought (II)
Complete Module 1 in LEO
4
Monday
August 23
“I am because we are”; individual and
society
Complete Module 2 in LEO
5
Monday
August 30
The Good Life and the Golden Rule Complete Module 3 in LEO
Page 7 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
6
Monday
September 6
Human Flourishing and the Common Good Complete Module 4 in LEO
7
Monday
September 13
The Common Good
Understanding the common good and
inequality
Complete Module 5 in LEO
8
Monday
September 20
Case study – challenges to the common
good – freedoms and the common good
Vacation Week: September 27- October 3
Read Case Study Handouts provided in LEO
9
Monday
October 4
Advocacy – personal and professional
challenges of Catholic social thought
Complete Module 6 in LEO
10
Monday
October 11
Unit “wrap-up”.
Assessment 3
Complete Module 6 in LEO
Page 8 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
OVERVIEW OF ASSESSMENTS
The summary table presented below applies to all three modes of delivery for this unit.
Brief Description of Kind and Purpose of Assessment Tasks
Weighting Learning
Outcome/s Assessed
Graduate Attributes/
Generic Skills
Assessment task 1: Online quiz consisting of
questions that allow students to demonstrate their
learning of the knowledge components of LO1.
The quiz will focus on the principles of Catholic
Social Thought covered in the unit. The knowledge
components demonstrated here scaffold the
comprehension and application tasks that follow in
AT2 and AT3, hence this early low-stakes
assessment prepares students to develop their
knowledge, comprehension and application
progressively.
15%
LO1
GA5
Assessment task 2: written task; assessment of
comprehension in relation to LO1: for example, by
use of a reflective written paper or equivalent in
which students describe principles of Catholic
Social Thought (CST), and drawing on these,
produce a personal commentary that explains how
the concepts of 'self' and 'community' are
interrelated. For this assessment, “community”
includes the student’s discipline area.
35%
LO1 LO2
GA1, GA2
Assessment task 3: creative task and written
reflection; assessment of application skills in
relation to LO1 and LO2: following the generation
of a creative work, students will produce a written
paper in which they reflect on the creation of the
work and the ways in which the piece produced
articulates the connection between the themes
of the unit and principles of Catholic Social
Thought.
50%
LO1, LO2
GA4, GA5, GA8, GA9
Page 9 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
ASSESSMENT
In order to pass this unit, you are required to achieve a final grade of 50% or better as an aggregate score of all points from assessment tasks completed in this unit.
The assessment tasks for this unit are designed for you to demonstrate your achievement of each learning outcome.
Assessment tasks
Due date
Weighting (%) Learning outcome/s assessed
Graduate Attributes assessed
Quiz (online) September 1 5pm
15% 1 GA1, GA7, GA8, GA9
Reflection (essay) September 22
5pm
35% 1,2 GA1, GA7, GA8, GA9
Creative work and reflection October 20, 5pm 50% 1,2 GA2, GA4, GA7,
ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION, MARKING AND RETURN
Assessments 2 and 3 will be submitted and returned electronically through LEO. In accordance with University policy, penalties are applied for late submission without formal approval from the Faculty Academic Liaison. These penalties are 5% of the assignment’s value if the assignment is submitted up to 24 hours after the specified day and time (one day late); 10% if submission is between 24 and 48 hours after the due date (two days late) and 15% if the submission is received between 48 and 72 hours after the due date (three days late). Submissions after this time will not receive a mark. NB: the numerical grade for the unit will be released at the end of the unit.
Word limits
Students may exceed the word limit on assessments by up to 10% without penalty. However, the marking penalty for exceeding the word limit by more than 10% will be calculated in this way: 5% of the total available marks for the assessment will be deducted from the student’s mark for each further 10% by which the number of words in the student’s assessment exceeds the limit. Similar penalties are imposed for assessments that are below the required word limit. Word limits do not include the reference list or the in-text references. (References do not count in the word limit.)
ASSESSMENT TASK 1
Online quiz (LEO)
Answer questions worth 15 marks about the principles of Catholic Social Thought
Due date:
Weighting:
Length and/or format:
Purpose:
Opens August 27, 9am; closes September 1, 5pm
15%
Quiz (15 questions)
To test your comprehension of the nine principles of Catholic Social Thought
Learning outcomes assessed: 1
ASSESSMENT TASK 2
Page 10 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
Write a personal reflection (in essay form) explaining the meaning and value of some of the principles of Catholic Social Thought in your own life (and/or experience).
1. Choose and state two or three principles of Catholic Social Thought which are covered in the unit content, other than the principle of the common good and the principle of the dignity of the human person; define and explain what you understand each one to mean. 2. Explain how the chosen principles are relevant and valuable in relation to the skills and knowledge that you are acquiring in the degree program that you are studying. 3. Identify one specific community that you belong to and explain, with examples, how the chosen principles may be relevant and valuable in relation to the aims or objectives of this community 4. Explain how the principles of the dignity of the human person and the common good are relevant and valuable in relation to the degree program that you are studying
Readings for this assessment:
The readings from the modules available to you and the additional resources on LEO and through any wider
or further reading you wish to include.
Please note that you are not required to read outside of the reading list in the unit in order to achieve a
high distinction in this assessment task.
General Instructions:
• The nine principles are: the Dignity of the Human Person; the Common Good; the Preferential
Option for the Poor; Subsidiarity; the Universal Purpose of Goods; the Stewardship of Creation; the Promotion of Peace; Participation; Global Solidarity.
• From this assessment you will receive constructive feedback to assist you in completing assessment 3.
• The reflection is to be between 1,000-1,200 words in length (penalties will apply for assessments that exceed the word limit and also for late submissions: please see the assessment overview and instructions on LEO)
• All material must be referenced, if it is not original (see the notes on the UNCC100 LEO page for how to reference according to your discipline area).
• References and in-text citations do not count in the word limit. Please include a Bibliography or reference list for this assessment. Please see the General Instructions on LEO for this assessment
Due date:
Weighting:
September 22, 5pm
35%
Page 11 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
Length and/or format: 1,000-1200 words.
Purpose: Write a reflection explaining principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST), and how “self” and “community” are interrelated.
Learning outcomes assessed:
1. Describe coherently in writing the principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST), and drawing on these produce a personal commentary that explains how the concepts of 'self' and 'community' are
interrelated.
2. Analyse and evaluate the principles of Catholic Social Thought (CST) in order to show how issues relating to the dignity of the human person and the common good may be relevant to the skills and knowledge that they are acquiring in the degree program that they are studying.
How to submit: Your reflection must be uploaded to LEO via Turnitin.
Return of assignment: Assignments will be returned on October 8 providing feedback for
preparation of assignment 3.
Assessment criteria: A rubric outlining the criteria you will be marked on and the standard for
each criterion required to achieve each grade for Assignment 2 is attached below
UNCC100 Marking Rubrics
Assessment Task 2
Pass Fail
States 2-3 Catholic Social Thought Principles (other than the principles of the common good and human dignity)
(4 marks)
States 2-3 Catholic Social Thought Principles accurately. Fails to state 2-3
Catholic Social
Thought
Principles
HD
85-100
DI
75-84
CR
65-74
P
50-64
NN
0-49
Page 12 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
Explains 2-3 Catholic Social Thought Principles (other than the principles of the common good and human dignity)
(7 marks)
Exemplary, coherent, clear and accurate explanation of 2-3 Catholic Social Thought Principles.
Shows deep engagement with the unit materials.
Explains 2-3
Catholic Social
Thought
Principles very
coherently,
clearly and
accurately.
Shows evidence
of deep
engagement with
the unit materials
Explains 2-3
Catholic Social
Thought
Principles
coherently,
clearly and
accurately.
Shows evidence
of engagement
with the unit
materials
Explains 2-3
Catholic Social
Thought
Principles
coherently, and in
a largely clear and
accurate way
Fails to explain
clearly, coherently
and accurately 2-3
Catholic Social
Thought Principles
(descriptions of
the principles are
generally very
vague, or
inaccurate).
Page 13 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
Explains how the principles chosen are relevant and valuable in relation to the skills and knowledge that the student is acquiring in the degree program that they are studying and in relation to one specific community that they belong to
(12 marks)
Explains with exemplary clarity and coherence how the principles chosen are relevant and valuable in relation to the skills and knowledge that the student is acquiring in the degree program that they are studying and in relation to one specific community that they belong to
Explains in a very
clear and
coherent way how
the principles
chosen are
relevant and
valuable in
relation to the
skills and
knowledge that
the student is
acquiring in the
degree program
that they are
studying and in
relation to one
specific
community that
they belong to
Explains in a clear
and coherent way
how the principles
chosen are
relevant and
valuable in
relation to the
skills and
knowledge that
the student is
acquiring in the
degree program
that they are
studying and in
relation to one
specific
community that
they belong to
Explains in a
largely clear and
coherent way how
the principles
chosen are
relevant and
valuable in
relation to the
skills and
knowledge that
the student is
acquiring in the
degree program
that they are
studying and in
relation to one
specific
community that
they belong to
Fails to explain
how the principles
chosen are
relevant and
valuable in
relation to the
skills and
knowledge that
the student is
acquiring in the
degree program
that they are
studying and in
relation to one
specific
community that
they belong to
Explains how the principles of the dignity of the human person and the common good are relevant and valuable in relation to the degree program that they are studying
(6 marks)
Exemplary, coherent, clear and accurate explanation of how the principles of the dignity of the human person and the common good are relevant and valuable in relation to the degree program that they are studying
Explains very
coherently clearly
and accurately
how the principles
of the dignity of
the human person
and the common
good are relevant
and valuable in
relation to the
degree program
that they are
studying
Explains
coherently clearly
and accurately
how the principles
of the dignity of
the human person
and the common
good are relevant
and valuable in
relation to the
degree program
that they are
studying
Explains in a
largely clear and
accurate way how
the principles of
the dignity of the
human person
and the common
good are relevant
and valuable in
relation to the
degree program
that they are
studying
Fails to explain
clearly coherently
and accurately
how the principles
of the dignity of
the human person
and the common
good are relevant
and valuable in
relation to the
degree program
that they are
studying
(descriptions of
the principles are
generally very
vague, or
inaccurate).
Page 14 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
Style and Writing
Mechanics
(3 marks)
Presents all information clearly in a highly engaging style with no errors
Presents
information
clearly, overall, in
a very engaging
style with
occasional or no
errors in grammar,
capitalization,
punctuation and
spelling
Presents
information clearly
overall, in an
engaging style
with occasional
errors in grammar,
capitalization,
punctuation and
spelling
Presents
information
clearly, overall,
with few errors in
grammar,
capitalization,
punctuation and
spelling
Presents
information
unclearly Many
errors in grammar,
capitalization,
punctuation and
spelling, in
general.
Referencing
(3 marks)
Exemplary
citation.
Provides entirely accurate information about all sources used
Accurately cites
all sources of
information,
provides accurate
information about
all sources used
Sources are cited
accurately, and
student provides
accurate
information about
the sources used,
in general.
Sources are cited
and student
provides
information about
sources used, in
general.
No referencing or
sources not cited
accurately
throughout.
Page 15 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
ASSESSMENT TASK 3
The themes of the unit reflect a wide range of existential concerns that have an impact on us at various
times in our lives: for example, our concern for the promotion of human dignity and our desire for
flourishing.
Your first task is to identify one theme from the list below:
• The meaning and value of communities
• Ubuntu (I am because we are) and flourishing
• Virtues the “good life” and flourishing
• Human dignity and justice
• The Golden Rule and advocacy
• Self, community and belonging (local)
• Self, community and interconnectedness
Second task: think about the ways in which your selected theme connects with your own experience of
a community that you belong to. The community that you belong to can be small and must be local
(possibly a family, or a local volunteering group) or bigger such as a civic community or online
community.
Third task: create an original imaginative piece of work that expresses the theme that you have chosen
(and the way it connects with a community you belong to) and which relates to some of the principles of
Catholic Social Thought.
Your creative work should be based on your own experience in a local community that you belong to and
reflect the theme that you have selected.
Your creative work should be up to 300 words or the equivalent of 1-2 pages if it is a work of art.
Examples of a creative work might be:
• a diary entry
• a letter (to a political party, your local member, a leader in the community, and so on)
• a short story
• a poem
• a piece of art (a photo, a sketch, a painting, a collage, a short film etc.)
Finally, write a personal reflection in essay form on the work that you have created, explaining the
relationships between your created work, your selected theme and 3 or 4 principles (in total) of
Catholic Social Thought which are covered in the unit.
Page 16 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
General Instructions: The reflection should clearly explain to readers what the relationship is between your created work, the unit content and at least 3 or 4 principles of Catholic Social Thought.
• Please see the marking rubric at the end of the Unit Outline
• The idea is to express your thoughts clearly and concisely and make your reflection as clear,
accurate (in terms of your understanding of the principles) and coherent as you can.
• The reflection does require correct and full referencing. Please include a Bibliography or reference list for this assessment.
• References and in-text citations do not count in the word limit.
• See referencing guidelines on the UNCC100 LEO page (You can find it under
Assessment>How do I reference materials in UNCC units?
Due date: October 20, 5pm
Weighting: 50%
Length and/or format: 1200 words long.
Learning outcomes assessed: 1, 2
How to submit: The assessment must be uploaded to LEO via Turnitin.
Return of assignment: Assignments will be returned via LEO when final grades are released.
If you are unsure how to find your assignment results and feedback you can read how to do this on
LEO under Assessment > How to find your results and feedback
Assessment criteria: A rubric outlining the criteria you will be marked on and the
standard for each criterion required to achieve each grade for Assignment 3 is attached
below.
Page 17 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
UNCC100 Marking Rubrics
Assessment Task 3
PA NN
Creates an original imaginative piece of work that expresses the theme that has been chosen from the list in the Unit Outline (and the way it connects with a community the student belongs to) and relates to some of the principles of Catholic Social Thought.
10 marks (Pass/Fail)
Creates an original imaginative piece of work that clearly and coherently expresses the theme that has been chosen (and the way it connects with a community the student belongs to) and relates to some of the principles of Catholic Social Thought.
Does not create an original imaginative piece of work that clearly and coherently expresses the theme that has been chosen (and the way it connects with a community the student belongs to) and relates to some of the principles of CST
HD
85-100
DI
75-84
CR
65-74
PA
50-64
NN
0-49
States and defines at least 3 or 4 principles of
Catholic Social Thought
(5 marks)
States and defines at least 3 or 4 principles of Catholic Social Thought in completely clear and accurate terms
States and defines at least 3 or 4 principles of Catholic Social Thought in very clear and accurate terms
States and defines at least 3 or 4 principles of Catholic Social Thought in clear and accurate terms
States and defines at least 3 or 4 principles of Catholic Social Thought in largely clear and accurate terms
Fails to state and define clearly and accurately at least 3 or 4 principles of
Catholic Social
Thought
Provides a
personal
reflection on
the work that
they created,
explaining the
relationship
between the
created work,
the chosen
theme
Provides a fully clear, accurate and coherent reflection on the work that they created, explaining the relationship between the created work, the chosen theme and at least 3 or 4 principles
Provides a very clear, accurate and coherent reflection on the work that they created, explaining the relationship between the created work, the chosen theme and at least 3 or 4 principles
Provides a clear, accurate and coherent reflection on the work that they created, explaining the relationship between the created work, the
chosen theme
and at least 3 or 4 principles of
Provides a largely clear, accurate and coherent reflection on the work that they created, explaining the relationship between the created work, the
chosen theme
and at least 3 or 4 principles of
Fails to provide a clear accurate and coherent reflection on the work that they created, explaining the relationship between the created work,
the chosen theme and at least 3 or 4 principles of Catholic Social Thought
Page 18 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
and at least
3 or 4
principles of
Catholic
Social
Thought
(25 marks)
of Catholic Social Thought
of Catholic Social Thought
Catholic Social
Thought
Catholic Social
Thought
Style and Writing
Mechanics
(5 marks)
Presents all information clearly and coherently in a highly engaging style with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling.
Presents
information
clearly and
coherently,
overall, in a
very
engaging
style with
occasional
or no errors
in grammar,
capitalization, punctuation and spelling.
Presents information clearly and coherently, overall, in an engaging style with occasional errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation and spelling.
Presents
information
clearly and
coherently,
overall, with
few errors in
grammar,
capitalization, punctuation and spelling.
Presents information in a largely unclear way.
Many errors in grammar,
capitalization, punctuation and spelling, in general.
Referencing (5 marks)
Provides fully accurate information about all sources used.
Accurately
cites all
sources of
information,
provides
accurate
information
about all
sources used
Sources are cited accurately, and student provides accurate information about the sources used, in general.
Sources are
cited and
student
provides
information
about
sources
used, in
general.
No referencing or sources not cited accurately throughout.
Page 20 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL ASSESSMENTS IN THIS UNIT
Referencing:
This unit requires you to use the referencing system used by your discipline area. See the
‘Academic referencing’ page of the Student Portal for more details.
ACU Policies and Regulations:
It is your responsibility to read and familiarise yourself with ACU policies and regulations, including
regulations on examinations; review and appeals; acceptable use of IT facilities; and conduct and
responsibilities. These are in the ACU Handbook, available from the website.
A list of these and other important policies can be found at the University policies page of the
Student Portal.
Assessment Policy and Procedures:
You must read the Assessment Policy and Assessment Procedures in the University Handbook: they include rules on deadlines; penalties for late submission; extensions; and special consideration. If you have any queries on Assessment Policy, please see your Lecturer in Charge.
Academic integrity:
You have the responsibility to submit only work which is your own, or which properly acknowledges the
thoughts, ideas, findings and/or work of others. The Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy and the
Academic Misconduct Procedures are available from the website. Please read them, and note in particular
that cheating, plagiarism, collusion, recycling of assignments and misrepresentation are not acceptable.
Penalties for academic misconduct can vary in severity and can include being excluded from the course. If you wish to reuse your own work (from any unit) you must have written permission from your Faculty Liaison in advance and attach this to your assignment; otherwise, this is considered recycling, which is not permitted.
Turnitin:
The Turnitin application (a text-matching tool) will be used in this unit, in order to enable:
• students to improve their academic writing by identifying possible areas of poor citation and
referencing in their written work;and
• teaching staff to identify areas of possible plagiarism in students’ written work.
While Turnitin can help in identifying problems with plagiarism, avoiding plagiarism is more important. Information on avoiding plagiarism is available from the Academic Skills Unit. For any assignment that has been created to allow submission through Turnitin (check the Assignment submission details for each assessment task), you should submit your draft well in advance of the due date (ideally, several days before) to ensure that you have time to work on any issues identified by Turnitin. On the assignment due date, lecturers will have access to your final submission and the Turnitin Originality Report.
Please note that electronic marking, Grademark, is used in this unit using Turnitin. Turnitin will be used as a means of submitting, marking and returning assessment tasks and so a text matching percentage will appear on your submission automatically.
Page 21 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
FIRST PEOPLES AND EQUITY PATHWAYS DIRECTORATE FOR ABORIGINAL AND
TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER STUDENTS
Every campus provides information and support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students.
Indigenous Knowings are embedded in curricula for the benefit of all students at ACU.
STUDENT SUPPORT
If you are experiencing difficulties with learning, life issues or pastoral/spiritual concerns, or have a
disability/medical condition which may impact on your studies, you are advised to notify your Lecturer in
Charge, Course Coordinator and/or one of the services listed below as soon as possible.
For all aspects of support please visit ACU Info section in the Student Portal.
• Academic Skills offers a variety of services, including workshops (on topics such as
assignment writing, time management, reading strategies, referencing), drop-in sessions,
group appointments and individual consultations. It has a 24-hour online booking system
for individual or group consultations.
• Campus Ministry offers pastoral care, spiritual leadership and opportunities for you to
be involved with community projects.
• The Career Development Service can assist you with finding employment, preparing
a resume and employment application and preparing for interviews.
• The Counselling Service is a free, voluntary, confidential and non-judgmental service
open to all students and staffed by qualified social workers or registered psychologists.
• Disability Services can assist you if you need educational adjustments because of a
disability or chronic medical condition; please contact them as early as possible.
ONLINE RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGY REQUIREMENTS
The LEO page for this unit contains further readings/discussion forums.
Campus URL
UNCC100 Semester 2 2021 Ballarat https://leo.acu.edu.au/course/view.php?id=38718
UNCC100 Semester 2 2021 Blacktown https://leo.acu.edu.au/course/view.php?id=38724
UNCC100 Semester 2 2021 Brisbane https://leo.acu.edu.au/course/view.php?id=38719
UNCC100 Semester 2 2021 Canberra https://leo.acu.edu.au/course/view.php?id=38720
UNCC100 Semester 2 2021 Melbourne https://leo.acu.edu.au/course/view.php?id=38721
UNCC100 Semester 2 2021 North Sydney https://leo.acu.edu.au/course/view.php?id=38722
UNCC100 Semester 2 2021 Strathfield https://leo.acu.edu.au/course/view.php?id=38723
Page 22 of 22
Updated 12/07/2021
REPRESENTATIVE TEXTS AND REFERENCES
Witenberg, Rivka, “A Refugee Like Me: Why the Golden Rule Matters in an Era of Mass Migration”,
in The Conversation, 26 November, 2015, at https://www.dailybulletin.com.au/the-
conversation/10183-
a-refugee-like-me-why-the-golden-rule-matters-in-an-era-of-mass-migration (4 pages online)
United Nations, The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, http://www.un.org/en/universal-
declaration-human-rights/index.html (4 pages online)
Pagnucco, Ron and Ensalaco, Mark, “Human Rights, Catholic Social Thought and the Liberal Rights
tradition”, in A Vision of Justice, Edited by Susan Crawford Sullivan and Ron Pagnucco, Liturgical Press,
Collegeville, Minnesota, 2014, pp. 139-160
United for Human Rights (UHR), http://www.humanrights.com/what-are-human-rights/brief- history/
declaration-of-independence.html (A Brief History of Human Rights, United for Human Rights)
There are many other recommended e-readings on LEO.