Coral bleaching response guide 2016 (Western Indian Ocean)

Responding to coral bleaching Western Indian Ocean 2016

David [email protected]

www.cordioea.net/WIO-bleaching-2016www.reefresilience.org/network

v. 13 January 2016

http://www.cordioea.net/WIO-bleaching-2016

http://www.reefresilience.org/network


Coral bleaching – 2016Western Indian Ocean

2016 may be a major bleaching year in the WIO1) 2015 has been the hottest year ever globally2) A very strong El Niño is underway in Dec

2015 – Jan 2016, in a very similar pattern to that observed in 1997-98

3) The WIO is starting the season VERY HOT4) Coral bleaching has been widespread in the

Pacific and Caribbean in mid-late 2015, which suggests major bleaching likely in the Western Indian Ocean in early 2016

El Niño IO Dipole

Coral bleaching – 2016Western Indian Ocean

This is part of the GCRMN reporting for the WIO in 2015-16, and results of monitoring will be included in it.

This presentation is heavy on text, for it to be accessible to users after this.

Nevertheless this is a simple overview of a basic bleaching response plan for any responders to undertake in the WIO during 2016. The basic elements of a 4-step response plan, and options for bleaching methods are presented, to suit different users’ needs, and assure consistency among data to help with regional reporting.

Key references and resources are listed on the last page.

Detailed explanation of the methods is available in a companion report.

December January February March April May June

A) Preparation B) First observations C) Monitor bleaching, mortality, recovery

D) Communicate, report, relate respond




A) Preparation

GUIDING QUESTIONS• Why are you monitoring

bleaching?• What staff or volunteers are

available to do monitoring?• Do you have any funding to

support monitoring?

The more complex your answers are to the above, the more detailed you are likely to be able to collect data.

A) WHY?Why are you monitoring bleaching? This should guide all decisions in subsequent steps.

B) FIRST OBSERVATIONSWho is on the water enough to provide reliable first observations of bleaching? Approach them to do this, and help prepare them.

C) MONITORINGWhat methods can you apply given your resources, expertise, etc? Prepare the main stakeholders/individuals who will do the monitoring.

D) COMMUNICATIONWho needs to know about the bleaching?• Do the responsible agencies/authorities know

anything about bleaching?• Do stakeholders (e.g. fishers, tourism operators,

hotels, etc.) know anything about bleaching• Does the public know anything about bleaching?• Is the media interested in/know anything about

bleaching?

DO THE FIRST COMMUNICATION BEFORE BLEACHING HAPPENS – PREPARE ALL STAKEHOLDERS TO HEAR MORE NEWS FROM YOU AS IT UNFOLDS.

If you need advice, consult in the WIO group on the

reef resilience forum




B) First observations

.

.

GUIDING QUESTIONS• Are you getting news/forecasts about the

progression of bleaching in the WIO?• Are there people regularly on/over the reefs

that can alert you to the first signs of bleaching? (e.g. dive/snorkel guides, fishermen, MPA rangers, pilots in low-flying/small planes)

To catch the first signs of coral bleaching you need to have frequent visitors to some reefs that can distinguish the first signs of bleaching from other things.

BE WARNED!!• http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/ for

global and http://1.usa.gov/1IWoSCq for regional information.

• Visit www.cordioea.net/bleachingalert for updated WIO alerts.

• Send an email to [email protected] to receive email alerts every 2 weeks.HOW TO OBSERVE FIRST BLEACHING

First observations of bleaching must be able to reliably distinguish bleaching from other conditions, such as dead coral skeletons, white soft corals, etc.

http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/



http://1.usa.gov/1IWoSCq



http://www.cordioea.net/bleachingalert

http://www.cordioea.net/bleachingalert

mailto:[email protected]




C) MonitoringMETHODSBased on your answers and capabilities, there are three basic levels at which you could collect data. These are described in detail in the accompanying GUIDE. Click on the buttons below to see further details on each:

Basic – approximate estimate of proportion of colonies affected at a site, little or no taxonomic information.Intermediate – visual estimates of coral colonies in basic categories of normal/bleached/dead, genus level identificationHigh – area-based census of coral colonies in continuous categories of normal/bleached/dead, genus level identification, with or without colony size information.

GUIDING QUESTIONS• How often are you able to visit your sites,

how many sites do you have? • Are there stakeholders who can help collect

data? • Do you have a system in place to

manage/hold the data?• Do you have an existing monitoring

programme that this builds on?

If you have different people/groups with different abilities, you could plan for different levels of monitoring to make the most of all contributors.




C) MonitoringWHEN TO MONITOR?

To track the progression of coral bleaching you ideally need to visit a site once very 2 weeks for as long as the event lasts.

But it depends on your budget.

BASELINE (WITH GREATER RESOURCESIdeally baseline conditions should be established at monitoring sites, so as far as possible:

• Pre-select your sites (moderate/good corals)

• Apply a first set of measurements before bleaching, then re-start the monitoring after 1st observations of bleaching are confirmed.

IF YOU CAN ONLY GO OUT ONCE OR TWICE (LIMITED RESOURCES)The most important time to monitor is at the PEAK of the bleaching event, to get the maximum levels. Before is too early … after all the mortality has happened its very hard to identify what mortality was due to bleaching.

If you can go out again, then about 6-8 weeks later should give a full picture of mortality vs. recovery from bleaching.

Through contacts with observers in the field (Part B), and the regional or other national teams, you can identify the best time to go out and do the monitoring



D) Communicating KEY AUDIENCES AND METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING

Reef Users• Use email/sms/whatsapp groups• Prepare briefings/messages for staff to

give with users Decision-makers/Senior management• prepare a meeting or email/letter brief

Colleagues• Use email lists, the reef resilience forum

and network web-page

The media/Public• Prepare press releases to be handed out,

and/or delivered verbally

.

GUIDING QUESTIONS• Who do you need to reach and why? • Can you consult with them first on how, when

and why they want to receive information? • Do you have photographs and information on

bleaching easily available to give to them?• Do you or others in your group social media –

facebook, twitter, instagram, linkedin? Use it!

Keep key people updated monthly during the bleaching season .


KEY RESOURCES to help you reach out to audiences- Videos explaining coral bleaching- Photographs of bleached coral- Some key text and explanations you can copy

and paste into press releases/letters, etc.

HASHTAG IT!!

#wiobleaching2016

Monitoring methods

The next pages give details on recommended monitoring methods at basic, intermediate and high levels of expertise/effort.

The final pages show photographs of the typical appearance of bleaching, and of other features underwater that are white, but are NOT bleaching.

Component Basic

Sampling location Arbitrary, use 5-6 minute timed swim for standardization

Spatial Broad area of reef in view, perhaps 10-50 m along

Corals All hard corals, key genera noted where possible.

Bleaching & mortality observations

None (<1%), low (1-10%), medium (10-50%), high (50-90%), extreme (>90%) bleaching. Can also use the same levels to estimate mortality.

Method – in situ Estimate overall “look” of coral community, for all corals combined, and estimate proportion in categories given above.

Can do an overall count of colonies affected or not, to help estimation of %, but be aware of tendency to focus on larger colonies.

Note key features, such as principal genera affected, and estimate proportion for those, if possible

Method - photographic Take 2-3 general views of the reef area, plus 10 or more vertical images 1m above substrate, separated by 2 or more meters.

Two methods for analysis:o proportion of corals is estimated as a % of coral community in each category in each photo, averaged

across the photos.o using 5*5 grid of points (25 per frame), score number of corals in each category, add together for

total, and calculate % per category. Use a 1m long PVC stick/ monopod to help with camera-benthos distance, but try and keep it out of the

frame to maximize the utility of photos for other purposes.Pros Most accessible for users with low technical skills.

Most rapid, can be applied over many sample sites in a short time.Cons Very open to personal bias in estimation of area affected and estimating impact.

Minimum taxonomic resolutionModifications Can add detail on taxonomy (genera) and the proportion affected.

Photos/video can be collected to verify estimates, or for experienced observers to assess basic bleaching levels remotely.

Ideal target population People ‘on the job’ (dive-masters, snorkel guides, MPA rangers/staff doing routine patrols), volunteers with limited experience – e.g. dedicate an additional 15-20 minutes of time to do bleaching monitoring.

C) Monitoring method - BASIC

Component Medium

Sampling location Arbitrary

Spatial Multiple areas selected by eye. Sizes of 1-2 up to 12 m2 in size have been used.

Corals All coral genera, no size


Fixed classes, e.g. normal, pale, part-bleached (10-50%), bleached (100%), part-dead, fully dead (recent mortality only).

More detailed categories have also been used: 0%, pale (any amount), <20%, 20-50%, 50-80%, 80-100% bleached, recently dead.

Method – in situ Score ALL coral colonies >10 cm diameter in the sampling area, recording their genus and condition. Take care to not exclude normal colonies.

If uncertain of genus ID, record (‘other’)Method - photographic Take 4-5 general views of the reef area.

Take 20 or more vertical images 1m above substrate, separated by 2 or more meters – follow same guidelines as for basic method.

Analysis same as in basic category, including genus identification and greater replication.Pros Relatively rapid, allows for sample selection over wide area of reef.

Can be undertaken more easily while doing other work.

Cons Bias due to selection of sample points Bias due to preferential recording of bleaching bleached corals over normal ones, particularly for smaller

colonies Inadequate sampling of all corals - reefs can have >40 colonies/m2, so counting all colonies reliably in larger

samples (e.g. 2m radius) is unreliable and unlikely to be done consistently. Fixed classes for pale, bleaching and partial mortality ignore complex interactions between classes,

especially partial morality with partial bleaching.Modifications Disease and other conditions can be added.

Add rugosity measurement to give a more complete description of the site. Use radial lines/quadrats to standardize sampling of unit areas.

Ideal target population Management and monitoring programmes with semi-experienced staff/students/etc, but contributors are of varying experience levels

C) Monitoring method - INTERMEDIATE

Component High

Sampling location Arbitrary or fixed.

Spatial Belt transects (e.g. 25*1 m) Due to the higher accuracy of this method, for repeated sampling it is advisable to fix a transect during the first

sample(s), using nails at the beginning and intermediate points (e.g. 5 m apart) in the transect. Ideally, record 2 or more transects per site.

Corals Genus, with or without size


Continuous scale - proportion (%) of colony pale, bleached, dead. Include disease and other conditions.

Method – in situ Score ALL coral colonies >10 cm diameter whose centers are within the quadrats/belts. Record their genus and % of each condition on the coral colony. If included, record size – IUCN method uses size classes of 11-20; 21-40; 41-80; 81-160; 161-320; and > 320 cm. If uncertain of genus ID, record (‘other’) If using fixed transects, only need to record all colonies on the first sample. After that, only record those colonies

that show some degree of bleaching/mortality (and disease).Method - photographic Take 4-5 general shots of the reef area,

Take vertical images 1m above substrate along the full line of the transect. Make sure the images overlap enough to show the continuity of the transect. This is unlikely to record the full 1m width of the transect, but the degree of sampling should be comparable (e.g. of a 25*0.6 m belt).

Analysis same as in medium category, with greater replication. If sizes are to be included, must use a length scale. This can be a right-angle at the benthic end of the 1m spacer/mono-pod. Use a 20 cm length, marked clearly at 10 and 20 cm.

Pros Most unbiased method to prevent over-counting of bleached and large corals (forces counting of normal and small corals)

Bleaching and mortality estimates are standardize to coral biomass (area) and density of corals on the reef. Accommodates variation in bleaching and mortality state of corals. Addresses size-dependent variation in bleaching

Cons Time consuming. Sampling constrained to smaller areas of a reef due to the higher detail, so risk of bias due to spot-selection. Likely to be too detailed for most management applications, most applicable to research programmes.

Modifications Multiple additions can be done –e.g. of disease, rugosity, benthic cover, algae characteristics, etc. to extend the detail of sampling.

Ideal target population Research programmes and/or well-established management and monitoring programmes with dedicated/fixed staff and the ability to analyse the detailed information and/or use it in management decisions.

C) Monitoring method - HIGH

Examples of bleaching

Examples of other white conditions on corals – not bleaching …

Normal (pale) corals

Diseases

References and resources …ManualObura DO (2016). Coral Bleaching Monitoring Guide, Western Indian Ocean – 2016. Biodiversity Project, Indian Ocean Commission, CORDIO East Africa.

References in the main manualFlorida Reef Resilience Program (xx) Florida Reef Tract: Coral

Bleaching Response Plan Marshall, P. (2003). Great Barrier Reef Coral Bleaching Response

Program. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Australia.Marshall and Schuttenberg 2006 – Reef Managers guideMcClanahan TR, Ateweberhan M, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Ruiz

Sebastián C, Guillaume MMM, Bruggemann JH (2007) Western Indian Ocean coral communities: bleaching responses and susceptibility to extinction. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 337: 1–13

Obura, D.O., and Grimsditch, G., (2009) Resilience assessment of coral reefs- Assessment protocol for coral reefs, focussing on coral bleaching and thermal stress. IUCN Working group on Climate change and coral reefs. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, www.iucn.org/cccr/publications 70pp.

Oliver, J, P. Marshall, N. Setiasih and L. Hansen, 2004. A global protocol for assessment and monitoring of coral bleaching. WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia and WWF Indonesia, Jakarta. 35 p.

All the above references are available at www.cordioea.net/WIO-bleaching

WebsitesResources associated with this guide:• www.cordioea.net/WIO-bleaching• www.reefresilience.org/network

NOAA Coral Reef Watch homepage: http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/research/coral_bleaching_report.php

http://www.cordioea.net/WIO-bleaching




http://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/satellite/research/coral_bleaching_report.php



Coral bleaching response guide 2016 (Western Indian Ocean)

Environment

Transcript of Coral bleaching response guide 2016 (Western Indian Ocean)