"Deleuze's Encounter With Whitehead" [Chapter 2 of Whitehead book]
Copyright Stories Hong Kong Library Association April 2009 Derek Whitehead President, ALIA .
-
Upload
alfred-snelgrove -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Copyright Stories Hong Kong Library Association April 2009 Derek Whitehead President, ALIA .
Copyright StoriesHong Kong Library Association
April 2009
Derek WhiteheadPresident, ALIA
www.alia.org.au
Where I Come From
President of ALIA (Australian Library and Information Association) 2008-2009 at http://www.alia.org.au/advocacy/copyright
Librarian since 1976 Chair, Australian Digital Alliance at
http://www.digital.org.au University Copyright Officer at Swinburne
University of Technology Member of two national committees on
copyright: IPPTAG (IP & Privacy Technical Advisory Group) and Universities Australia Expert Reference Group
Where I Come From
We provide copyright services to another university – University of Ballarat
CAIRSS Copyright Service, 2009-2010 http://www.caul.edu.au/cairss
Australian Libraries Copyright Committee Our role is to maximise the use by the
university of other people’s intellectual property.
Not a lawyer, and nothing in this paper constitutes legal advice
Greetings from ALIA
President of ALIA until 19 May and vice president since 2007
ALIA surveyed its members recently and the main issues are Lobbying and advocacy Professional development The future library workforce Accreditation of courses . . . and the global economic crisis too
Not only copyright Happy to answer questions about ALIA later
Greetings from ALIA
A particular welcome to IFLA – Brisbane, 14-19 August 2010 http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla76/index.htm
World Library and International Congress Libraries: Engaging, Embracing,
Empowering. Brisbane Convention Centre
Approach
I represent a viewpoint about copyright – a balance between the interests of owners and users
ADA: “promote balanced copyright law and provide an effective voice for a public interest perspective in the copyright debate.”
ADA members include universities, schools, consumer groups, cultural institutions, IT companies (Google), libraries and individuals.
Approach
ALIA: Relevant objective is to promote the free flow of information and ideas in the interest of all Australians and a thriving culture, economy and democracy.
ALIA also supports the interests of Australian copyright users.
ALIA has a Copyright and Intellectual Property Advisory Committee
Provides copyright advice
Approach
Swinburne: Copyright Policy at http://www.swin.edu.au/copyright
Some informal principles at Swinburne “Its not about principles, its about money.” Complete compliance is not a practical goal Intellectual property is not the same as real
or personal property – ownership is not absolute, and the primary goal is the advancement of knowledge
We take a risk management approach
What is copyright?
A bundle of exclusive rights, for a limited period, to do certain things with a work.
There are exceptions to these rights which enable others to use copyright material.
The rights of a copyright owner include to copy, publish, communicate, and perform.
The kinds of works include writing, visual images, music and moving images.
Copyright applies to the way an idea or information is expressed, not to ideas and information.
Libraries’ concerns
Exceptions – things you can do which are exceptions to the rights of owners
Fair use or fair dealing – the right to do some things because they are “fair”
Home copying and rights of owners Educational copying – most countries allow
some exceptions for schools & universities Preservation Inter-library loans Enforcement issues – libraries strongly
oppose being involved in enforcement
Moral rights
Belong to authors, not owners Most valuable copyright is not owned or
controlled by the author or artist – e.g. books, movies, music
Moral rights do not exist in all countries – e.g. not in the US
Right to be identified as the author Right to have works treated in a way that is
not derogatory Politeness is important too – sometimes it is
good to ask, even if you don’t have to
Stories
This presentation takes some stories which have been in the news, and explains What is the danger What the story tells us
Copyright is about people wanting to do things. Maybe they can and maybe they can’t
A Copyright Officer answers questions which start: “Can I . . .? And ends with “I’m afraid not” or “Yes, you can do that”.
Copyright stories are about what people want to do, and how we can find ways they can. Sometimes. And what we can learn.
What Characters?
There are six characters in these stories. A copyright owner in 2145. Accidental copyright owners Copyright owners who care more about
other things Copyright owners who care a lot about
copyright Governments – who make the rules Ordinary people doing ordinary things
Dangerous Times
These stories illustrate some trends, some of which are dangers.
The way copyright works in our world changes all the time.
Some people want to limit what we can do, others want to expand it.
Libraries generally favour expanding the rights of users, and oppose limiting those rights in favour of owners.
At the end, I will suggest some simple rules to follow for libraries and other institutions in working with copyright – to stay nice.
Today’s dangers1. Extension of copyright term2. Capture of the process by those with very
strong material interests.3. Undermining existing rights of fair use4. Criminalisation of copyright law5. Requirement of third parties to enforce the
law - denial of access is increasingly a draconian penalty.
6. The use of threats – chilling effects.7. Divorce between the law and what ordinary
people believe is right or common sense8. Threat to innovation and creativity.
What Stories? New Zealand’s Section 92 Punishment Shepard Fairey The Kindle Cliff Richard Child criminals Secrets and lies DRM Trespass: the public domain Copyright-free zones Orphans Creative Commons Popular movements
New Zealand: Sect 92
In 2008 New Zealand amended the Copyright Act
ISPs must act against customers who infringe copyright – repeat offenders
Libraries are covered by this – they are “downstream ISPs.”
Advice by LIANZA – libraries would need to ban infringers from Internet services other than online databases
New Zealand: Sect 92
Libraries may not be able to identify users They may disagree about the alleged
infringement Libraries must have a policy which
provides termination for infringers Libraries become part of the enforcement
mechanism for copyright owners Infringement is mostly not a criminal
offence
New Zealand: Sect 92
Implementation was postponed to the end of March.
The legislation has now been cancelled pending review.
But similar legislation is pending elsewhere – called “three strikes” (a baseball metaphor)
Aim is to have someone else deal with repeat offenders
The penalty – disconnection – is draconian.
Punishment
Copyright legislation includes penalties for infringing other peoples rights – mainly fines, prison for commercial-scale infringement (piracy)
Statutory damages are becoming more common – where the law prescribes a specific fine
Disconnection from the Internet is sought by owners – someone else would do it.
Punishment
Making examples of people. YouTomb – http://youtomb.mit.edu – has
examples of material taken down from YouTube for copyright infringement. E.g.
A 4-year-old miming a song, Juke Box Hero A baby dancing to a Prince song A rodeo association agreed to pay $25,000
to an animal rights group These are all fair use – no infringement, no
harm to the owner’s interests
Punishment
French legislation pending 57% of French 18-24 yr olds illegally
download HADOPI = Haute Autorite pour la diffusion
des oeuvres et la protection des droits sur Internet
Will manage graduated response Opposed by civil liberties advocates Alternatives? A monthly subscription for
music? File sharing for non-commercial purposes legalised and a fund for creators? Levy on ISP account holders of 2 Euros pm
Shepard Fairey
Shepard Fairey is a street artist based in Los Angeles.
He produced as red white and blue portrait of Barack Obama
The portrait has appeared on posters and t-shirts, and is now in the National Portrait Gallery in Washington and other places too
The image was based on a photograph taken by Mannie Garcia, a photographer working for Associated Press (AP)
The main version, Obama Hope, became Obama’s iconic image – see http://www.popcultureshock.com/blogs/shepard-fairey-obama-posters/
Shepard Fairey
AP is suing Shepard Fairey for in- fringing its copyright in the image
Fairey claims that the use is fair If no-one could ever build one work
from another, what happens to creativity?
Fair use in the United States is a right everyone has to make use of copyright material if that use is “fair”
Should the copyright owner have the right to control all versions, variants, developments?
The Kindle 2 Last year Amazon, the well-known Internet
bookseller, introduced a device for reading e-books, called the Kindle.
As well as putting the e-book onto a screen convenient for reading, the Kindle can actually read the book out loud to you.
It uses a synthesised voice – the kind you get in GPS systems, or recorded telephone messages. You couldn’t confuse it with an actor or the author.
Great for people who can’t see or handle the machine easily.
The Kindle 2
What’s the problem? Last year the Authors Guild sued Amazon
saying “They don’t have the right to read a book out loud.”
Authors would lose revenue from audio books – they get royalties for an ebook, but lose out on audio rights, they said
What if reading aloud was a plug-in on the home computer? Or a software download.
The world has moved on, but not the authors
Cliff Richard
Sir Cliff Richard is a popular musician who has the distinction of having a longer career as a pop singer than almost anyone.
His first hit was in the 1950s, and he is still singing and selling pretty well.
He must be quite well off nowadays. However, he is at the centre of a debate
taking place in the European Community about copyright.
What is the problem?
Cliff Richard Copyright in sound recordings expires after
50 years – now extension to 95 proposed Copyright exists to encourage creativity and
invention But term of copyright has lately extended
massively – to life + 70 years “Copyright fuels innovation in the short
term, by bringing an income to creators, but stifles it in the long term, by creating monopolies and preventing new and creative re-uses, or even any use at all, as most music is hidden away . . .”
80% of funds will go to recording companies
Cliff Richard
Why does copyright get extended?
“enhanced prospects for global earnings in an increasingly international copyright market”
(Jane Ginsburg)
Free trade agreements are being used to extend the term.
Fair return to creators becomes enhanced profits for large corporations – RIAA & MPAA lead the charge
Child criminals Tendency for copyright infringement to
become criminalised In the US, the music industry (RIAA) has
targeted individuals – elsewhere less so Over 30,000 individual prosecutions. New strategy is to aim to work with ISPs
whether they like it or not. Why? Too much negative publicity when you
sue your customers.
Child criminals Brianna Laharra, a 12 year old girl from New
York, faced a penalty of $150,000 per song when sued by the RIAA. Her mother settled for $2000.
Durward Pickle, a 71-year old grandfather from Texas, faced similar penalties when his grandsons downloaded music while they were visiting.
Secrets and lies Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) Early discussions under way About “enforcement best practice” and
“enhancing the enforcement legal framework.”
Fears of “increased search powers for customs officers” and airport security officials
Concern that there is no public consultation on the treaty.
Concern about “asymmetrical release of information.”
Secrets and lies In the US, the draft text of the treaty has
been “classified in the interests of national security …”
Of 806 pages, 796 are classified In Australia, an alliance of Choice (the
consumer association), ALIA, ADA and Internet Industry Association has created a statement of principles.
Digital Rights Management DRM is a software lock which stops you
from doing things the copyright owner does not want done.
Such as printing, copying, cutting and pasting.
But iTunes has now begun to abandon this, and others are following. Why?
People hate DRM Rival firms were negotiating Software issues were significant Technology may not be the answer to a social
and market challenge Privacy issues are major Legal protection exists without DRM
Digital Rights Management If something is locked down, it only takes
one unlocked copy to make the lock useless
There is no evidence that DRM provides a clear benefit to copyright owners – and it does annoy the customers
The law increasingly permits people to do things which DRM tries to stop them doing – e.g. domestic copying
Trespass - the public domain
Victorian Government bushfire map Google wanted to overlay bushfire data
onto Google Maps Country Fire Authority (CFA) agreed to use
of its data and it went live But Victorian Government said no Access to the National Public Toilet Map –
also sought as an overlay to Google Maps In NSW Railcorp vetoed a railway timetable
application developed for iPhone and sold for $2.50 by Transit Sydney
Copyright-free zones
In some areas, copyright is mainly ignored Email Blogs Presentations like this Print, email & other buttons–implied licences Is advertising, PR and marketing copyright? http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=vkXSMZBdTLUThere are many areas where WE DON’T
WANT copyright to apply.
Orphans
Definition: works where the copyright owner cannot be traced or has abandoned the work.
Major report by the Library of Congress in 2008. Danger is that we will have a cumbersome system
Copyright is often unintended Older works more likely to be orphaned Mostly a trivial commercial value
What to do about orphans
Take these steps: A reasonably diligent search Clear and adequate attribution Remuneration or restitution if the copyright
owner appears Use should be non-exclusive Use disclaimers
Creative Commons Founded in 2001 by Lawrence Lessig, author
of Free Culture Standardised licences which give more rights
to the user – “open licences” Contrast with “all rights reserved” They reserve only attribution, commercial
use, derivative works New licence is CC0 – it waives all rights http://www.creativecommons.org
Creative Commons
This has a CC licence My staff put it there There are advanced search
functions in Flickr and Google for CC content
e.g. China Open Resources for Education at http://www.core.org.cn/core/default.aspx
Much much more
Popular movements New copyright
legislation and new rights but . . .
Limits to right to copy Harsh anti-
circumvention provisions
“the law should stop treating paying customers like criminals by giving them the right to legally shift their music to the device of their choice.” (Michael Geist)
Popular movements New copyright
legislation and new rights but . . .
Limits to right to copy Harsh anti-
circumvention provisions
“the law should stop treating paying customers like criminals by giving them the right to legally shift their music to the device of their choice.” (Michael Geist)
Popular Movements Lawrence Lessig has a
bloghttp://www.lessig.org/blog
And this book:Free Culture by Lawrence LessigHow Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control CreativityHardcover | 5.00 x 7.51 in | 348 pages | ISBN 1594200068 | 25 Mar 2004 | The Penguin Press
Don’t panic – eight rules
Some rules for getting by Understand the copyright owner’s interests. It
is mainly about money – high value content like films, music and software are more likely to be pursued by owners.
Understand risks – financial, reputational, operational.
Respect contractual obligations. Use disclaimers and a formal procedure for
investigation and takedown to mitigate risk. Easy to say sorry.
More rules
Use/promote open licences. Creative Commons provides a guide to open licensing and tools to use. All of these images have CC licences.
Respect the rights of authors and creators to be acknowledged as such.
There is an international movement to slow the growth of the copyright octopus. Join it.
And of course, be cool. Join your local library association.
Thank You
QUESTIONS?
Derek WhiteheadDirector, Information Resources and University
Copyright OfficerSwinburne University of Technology