COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor...

24
COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer

Transcript of COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor...

Page 1: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006

Class 5September 11, 2006

Idea/Expression DichotomyFunctionality

Professor Fischer

Page 2: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

WRAP-UP: FIXATION

Page 3: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

S. 1101

• Can Congress avoid the restrictions in the Copyright Clause of the Constitution by basing its legislative authority on the Commerce Clause instead?

Page 4: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Contrast:

• U.S. v. Martignon, 326 F. Supp.2d 413 (S.D.N.Y.), appeal pending (CB p. 92)

• And KISS Catalog v. Passport Int’l Prods., 350 F.Supp.2d 823 (C.D. Cal. 2005) (on reconsideration)

Page 5: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

IDEA-EXPRESSION DICHOTOMY

Page 6: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

IDEA-EXPRESSION DICHOTOMY

• COPYRIGHT PROTECTS EXPRESSION, NOT IDEAS

• EASY TO STATE, HARD TO APPLY

Page 7: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Functionality

• Functional aspect of works are excluded from copyright protection

Page 8: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Functionality

• Functional aspect of works are excluded from copyright protection So are they in the public domain?

Page 9: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Baker v. Selden (1879)

• Copyrightability of:

• System?

• Essay?

• Blank forms?

Page 10: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Baker v. Selden (1879)

• Where the use of the ''art,'' i.e., the idea, which a copyrighted work explains (or embodies) necessarily requires a copying of the work itself, then such copying will not constitute an infringement of copyright.

• However, if such copying occurs not in using the art but rather in explaining it, then such copying will constitute an infringement.

Page 11: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

To what extent is Baker v. Selden current law?

Page 12: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

17 U.S.C. § 102(b)

• In no case does copyright protection for an original work of authorship extend to any idea, procedure, process, system, method of operation, concept, principle, or discovery, regardless of the form in which it is described, explained, illustrated, or embodied in such work.

Page 13: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

17 U.S.C. 113(b)

• This title does not afford, to the owner of copyright in a work that portrays a useful article as such, any greater or lesser rights with respect to the making, distribution, or display of the useful article so portrayed than those afforded to such works under the law, whether title 17 or the common law or statutes of a State, in effect on December 31, 1977, as held applicable and construed by a court in an action brought under this title.

Page 14: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Blank Forms

• What is the blank form rule in Copyright Office Regulation 202.1(c)?

Page 15: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

The Blank Forms Rule (see Supp 243)

• Copyright Office Regulation 202.1(c): The following are examples of works not subject to copyright . . . Blank forms, such as time cards, graph paper, account books, diaries, bank checks, scorecards, address books, report forms, order forms and the like, which are designed for recording information and do not in themselves convey information.

• Is this good law?

Page 16: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Bibbero Systems, Inc. v. Colwell Systems, Inc. (9th Cir. 1990) CB p.

106• Copyrightability of medical superbill

• Court says it is “required to examine the scope of the blank forms rule.”

Page 17: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Bibbero Systems, Inc. v. Colwell Systems, Inc. (9th Cir. 1990) CB p.

106• Copyrightability of medical superbill

• According to the Ninth Circuit, did the blank form convey information?

• Did the “text with forms” exception apply?

Page 18: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Criticism of Bibbero

• Second Circuit in Kregos v. Associated Press, 937 F2d. 700 (2d Cir. 1991) (copyrightability of pitching form)

Page 19: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Morrissey v. Procter & Gamble, 379 F.2d 675 (1st Cir. 1967)

• Was the defendant liable for copyright infringement? Why or why not?

Page 20: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

Morrissey v. Procter & Gamble, 379 F.2d 675 (1st Cir. 1967)

• Was the defendant liable for copyright infringement? Why or why not? Merger doctrine (extension of Baker)

Page 21: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

COPYRIGHTABILITY OF INSTRUCTIONS

• E.g. operating manual for a digital camera

Page 22: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

COPYRIGHTABILITY OF RECIPE

• Julia Grownup perfects a recipe for pumpkin pie. She writes down the ingredients and a straightforward set of instructions for making the dish using standard terms/style for recipe writers. Emeril copies her recipe verbatim in his bestselling cookbook. Can she win a copyright infringement case?

Page 23: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

LEGAL FORMS: COPYRIGHTABLE?

• See Continental Casualty Co. v. Beardsley, 253 F.2d 701 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 816 (1958) (CB p. 105)

Page 24: COPYRIGHT LAW FALL 2006 Class 5 September 11, 2006 Idea/Expression Dichotomy Functionality Professor Fischer.

The Blank Forms Rule (see Supp 243)

• Copyright Office Regulation 202.1(c): The following are examples of works not subject to copyright . . . Blank forms, such as time cards, graph paper, account books, diaries, bank checks, scorecards, address books, report forms, order forms and the like, which are designed for recording information and do not in themselves convey information.