Copyright Alcohol Medical Scholars Program1 Pathological Gambling and Alcohol Use Disorders Timothy...

Copyright Alcohol Medical Scholars Program 1

Pathological Gambling and Alcohol Use Disorders

Timothy W. Fong MD

UCLA Gambling Studies Program

Alcohol Medical Scholars Program

2005-2007


Introduction

• Lifetime risk – Pathological gambling (PG) ~ 2%– Alcohol use disorders (AUD) 13%

• PG + AUD – Often co-occur– Worse outcomes


This lecture will cover

Pathological Gambling (PG)

Alcohol Use Disorders (AUD)

• Diagnostic criteria• Epidemiology• Consequences• Screening• Risk factors• Treatment


PathologicalGambling


Gambling in the United States

• 85% of Americans gamble • Available in 48 states• Gambling revenue: $72 billion/year• Increasing cultural acceptance

– 80% parents not opposed

(www.americangaming.org)


Social Gambling

• Similar in meaning to social drinking

• 85% of gamblers

• No negative impacts


Pathological Gambling

• Maladaptive use → impairment

Preoccupation Lying

Tolerance Withdrawal

Chases Bailed Out

Can’t stop Chases losses

Illegal Acts Gambles to escape


Epidemiology - USA

0

2

4

6

8

10

Kal

ick,

1976

Ger

stei

n,19

99

Wel

te,

2001

Pet

ry, i

npr

ess

%

Problem Pathological


Consequences ofPathological Gambling

Financial Ave. debt = $45,000

Relationships Divorce, child abuse

Time 25 hrs/wk

Crime Non-violent

Substance use disorders 4x risk

Medical Worse health


Screening Tools

• South Oaks Gambling Screen

• Lie/Bet Questionnaire– “Have you lied about your gambling?”– “Have you ever increased bets to get same

sense of action?”

• No objective tests


Risk Factors

• Genetic– 60% risk

• Psychological– Impulsive

• Social– Increased access– Heavy gambling peers


Treatment:Social Assistance

• Self-exclusion programs– Self-bar entrance into casinos

• Financial counseling

• Gambler’s Anonymous– >1500 chapters– Similar to Alcoholics Anonymous– 8% abstinent at 12 months


Psychosocial Treatment

• Cognitive behavioral therapy– Addresses cognitive distortions– 40% stopped gambling– Long-term data needed

• Helplines– 24-hour crisis interventions– No data on effectiveness– Widely available


Treatment:Pharmacotherapy

• Preliminary evidence

– Naltrexone– Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhbitiors

(SSRIs)– Valproic Acid– Lithium


Alcohol Use Disorders


Alcohol Use in the United States

• 63% drank over last 12 months

• Alcohol beverage industry: 2005– $6 billion gross revenue

• Alcohol use disorders– Abuse– Dependence


Alcohol Dependence

• Maladaptive use → impairment• ≥ 3 over 12 months

– Tolerance– Withdrawal– Larger amts than intended– Can’t decrease use– Excessive time– Decreased activities– Use despite problems

(American Psychiatric Association, 1994)


Epidemiology of AUD

• Lifetime prevalence – Males 15%– Females 8%

• 15 million meet criteria

• Economic burden: $155 billion


Consequences

• Medical– Cardiovascular: hypertension– Gastrointestinal: fatty liver– Neurological: peripheral neuropathy

• Work– ↑lateness, ↓performance, ↑injury

• Family– >80% spousal violence


Screening

• Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

• Michigan Alcohol Screening Test

• Lab tests

GGT>35

MCV>91.5

CDT>20


Risk Factors

• Gender– males > females

• Genetics– 60% risk

• Co-occurring psychiatric disorders– 45% lifetime prevalence

• Heavy drinking peers


Social Assistance

• 12-step, Alcoholics Anonymous– >75,000 groups in US– Peer support and fellowship

• SMART Recovery (Self-Management and Recovery Training)

– Self-reliance, personal responsibility


Psychosocial Treatment

• Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy– Identify motivations and triggers– Longer in treatment, better outcome

• Relapse Prevention– Identify risky situations– Develop alternative behaviors


Treatment: Pharmacotherapy

• Disulfiram– Efficacy: equivocal

• Naltrexone– Efficacy: ↓ drinks, ↓ # drinking days

• Acamprosate– Efficacy: ↑ tx completion and time to

first drink


Pathological Gambling&

Alcohol Use Disorders


PG and AUD

• More difficult to treat and retain

–2x rate of dropout

• Lower compliance rates

• Other comorbidities likely

• More likely to relapse


Epidemiology

• PG: ↑rates of AUD (40%)– ↑severity of PG = ↑risk for AUD

• AUD: ↑rates of PG (10%)– Lack of screening

• PG or AUD can occur first


Differences: PG and AUD

• No objective tests– No intoxicated states – No physical signs and symptoms

• Financial impact– PG may win or lose large amount at one

time


Treatment Considerations

• More data needed

• Must treat both disorders

• Get collateral information

• Periodic drug and alcohol testing

• Insurances don’t cover PG


Conclusions

• PG has serious life consequences

• PG + AUD = common occurrence

• Importance of screening

• Treatments available for both PG and AUD

Copyright Alcohol Medical Scholars Program1 Pathological Gambling and Alcohol Use Disorders Timothy...

Documents

Transcript of Copyright Alcohol Medical Scholars Program1 Pathological Gambling and Alcohol Use Disorders Timothy...