Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc. Reliability and Theory of Helical Pile Sizing Howard A....
-
Upload
savanah-sympson -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc. Reliability and Theory of Helical Pile Sizing Howard A....
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Reliability and Theory of Helical Pile Sizing
Howard A. Perko, Ph.D., P.E.Magnum Geo-Solutions, LLC
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc., All Rights reserved. May be distributed
and printed by express written permission of the author only.
MAGNUM Informational Bulletin ISO-MHP3-11A
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
• Axial Capacity and Helix Spacing• Theoretical Bearing Capacity• Theoretical Pullout Capacity• Helix Sizing Charts• Reliability of Charts• Capacity to Torque Ratio Background• Variation in Capacity:Torque Ratio• Reliability of Torque Method• Combined Reliability• Contact Information
Outline
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Axial Capacity
Limit States:
Cylindrical Shear& Individual Bearing
There are two ways to calculate the theoretical capacity of a helical pile. If the helices are far apart, they behave independently and one would use the individual bearing method. If the helices are close together, they would behave as a group and one would use the cylindrical shear method.
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Helix Spacing
Most efficient spacingwhere:
Cylindrical Shear= Individual Bearing
Generally occurs at2 to 4 Helix
Diameters
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Bearing Capacity
Traditional Soil Mechanics:
Individual Bearing
Q = R2(1.3cNc+Nq)
Cylindrical Shear
Q = 2RL(c+Ktan) +
R2(1.3cNc+ Nq)Limit State: Calculate both, and report whichever is least.
From Perko (2009) Helical Piles
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Pullout Capacity
Pullout Capacity is calculated the same way as Bearling Capacity. However, generally in practice, Pullout Capacity = 82% Bearing Capacity
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Displacement (in)
Tes
t L
oad
(ki
ps)
-180
-160
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
-100 -50 0 50 100
Displacement (mm)
Tes
t L
oad
(kN
)
Compression TestPu=36 kips [160 kN]
Tesnion TestPu=30 kips [130 kN]
From Perko (2009) Helical Piles
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Magnum Helix Sizing Charts
From Magnum 2011 Product Catalog
Magnum Piering, Inc. sizing charts were created using individual bearing and cylindrical shear methods. Charts are provided for cohesive soils, non-cohesive soils, and weak bedrock. Based on the SPT Blow Count of the bearing stratum, they yield required ultimate capacity.
In helical piles, engineers typically use a factor of safety of 2.0.
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Reliability of Sizing Charts
From Perko (2009) Helical Piles
Test data indicates sizing charts are 90% reliable when used with a F.S. = 2.0.
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Hoyt and Clemence (1989)
-91 Full-scale tension load tests
-Torque is shown to be statistically a strong verification of capacity
Capacity:Torque Background
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Perko (2000)
-Torque is shown to be theoretically related to capacity
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
0 10 20 30 40
Predicted Capacity/Torque Ratio (1/ft)
Mea
sure
d C
apac
ity/
To
rqu
e R
atio
(1/
ft)
Rupiper and Edwards (1989): 14-indiameter single helix, 1.5-in square hubpier
Ghaly, Hanna, and Hanna (1991): 2-indiameter single helix, multi-pitchlaboratory models
Mitsch and Clemence (1985): 12-indiameter triple helix, square hub pier
Mitsch and Clemence (1985): 4-indiameter single and triple helix laboratorymodels
Hargrave and Thorsten (1992): 10-indiameter single helix, square hub pier
Chance (1994): 10-14 in diameter singleand multiple helix, square hub piers
Chance (1994): 12-14 in single andmultiple helices on 3.5 diameter roundhub
Atlas (1995): 8-in diameter single helix, 1-3/4-in square shaft hub pier
Atlas (1995): 12 and 14 in double helices,2-7/8 in diam round shaft pier
Magnum Piering (2001): 8" & 12" doublehelices cut-out for moment balancing, 3"diameter round-shaft pier
Capacity:Torque Background
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Variation of Torque Correlation
Capacity to Torque Ratio Varies with Helical Pile Shaft Diameter.
From Perko (2009) Helical Piles
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Ultimate(tons)
Bare / Galv
Allowable(tons)
Bare / Galv
Ultimate(tons)
Allowable(tons)
MHL313 0.13 3.00 3.8 26 / 35 13 / 17 4,000 8.0 16 8 8,10,12,14 0.375 B (1) standard 6, 12, 24
MHL313R 0.13 3.00 3.8 26 / 35 13 / 17 6,000 8.0 24 12 8,10,12,14 0.375 B (1) standard 6, 12, 24
MHL325 0.25 3.00 7.3 60 / 68 30 / 34 8,700 8.0 35 17 8,10,12,14 0.375 B (1) standard 6, 12, 24
MHL325R 0.25 3.00 7.3 60 / 68 30 / 34 12,700 8.0 51 25 8,10,12,14 0.375 B (1) standard 6, 12, 24
MHL425 0.25 4.50 11.6 93 / 105 47 / 53 24,000 5.7 68 34 10,12,14,16 0.625 B (2) optional 7, 10, 24
MHL425R 0.25 4.50 11.6 93 / 105 47 / 53 28,000 5.7 80 40 10,12,14,16 0.625 B (2) optional 7, 10, 24
MHL431 0.31 4.50 14.3 118 / 131 59 / 65 29,000 5.7 83 41 10,12,14,16 0.625 B (2) optional 7, 10, 24
MHL431R 0.31 4.50 14.3 118 / 131 59 / 65 34,000 5.7 97 48 10,12,14,16 0.625 B (2) optional 7, 10, 24
MHL625 0.25 5.72 15.0 120 / 136 60 / 68 40,000 4.6 92 46 12,16,20,24 0.875 W or B (3) optional 6, 9, 18, 24
MHL625R 0.25 5.72 15.0 120 / 136 60 / 68 45,000 4.6 104 52 12,16,20,24 0.875 W or B (3) optional 6, 9, 18, 24
MHL637 0.37 5.72 21.2 180 / 196 90 / 98 58,000 4.6 133 67 12,16,20,24 0.875 W or B (3) optional 6, 9, 18, 24
MHL637R 0.37 5.72 21.2 180 / 196 90 / 98 65,000 4.6 150 75 12,16,20,24 0.875 W or B (3) optional 6, 9, 18, 24
MHL646 0.46 5.72 27.2 238 / 253 119 / 127 74,000 4.6 170 85 12,16,20,24 0.875 W or B (3) optional 6, 9, 18, 24
MHL646R 0.46 5.72 27.2 238 / 253 119 / 127 83,000 4.6 191 95 12,16,20,24 0.875 W or B (3) optional 6, 9, 18, 24
System Ratings & Capacity Specifications
HelixGauge
(in)
Bolted (B)or
Welded (W)Connection
Hot DipGalvanized
ASTMA153
StandardSection Lengths
(custom sizes available)
(ft)
Capacityto
TorqueRatio
(ft-1)
ShaftWall
Gauge(in)
ShaftO.D.(in)
Approx Weight
(plf)
End Bearing CapacityCapacity by Torque (Tension & Comp)
MaximumTorque(ft-lbs)
Helix Sizes(available in
standard & dual cutting edge)
(in)
Capacity-to-Torque RatiosMagnum’s Product Catalog Contains Suggested Capacity:Torque Ratios.
From Magnum 2011 Product Catalog
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 4.4
Popu
lati
on
Measured Axial CapacityPredicted Axial Capacity
Tension
Compression
TensionMean= 1.06Std Dev= 0.46
CompressionMean= 1.14Std Dev= 0.54
Installation Torque Correlation243 Load Tests
Reliability of Torque Method
From Perko (2009) Helical Piles
Test data indicates torque is 98% reliable when used with a F.S. = 2.0.
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
0.3% with FS=2.0
Statistically Independent
Variables
Combined Reliability
From Perko (2009) Helical Piles
Using Sizng Charts in Combination with Torque Verification yields 99.7% Reliability.
Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc.
Contact InformationMagnum Piering, Inc.
www.magnumpiering.com800-822-PIER (7437)
6082 Schumacher Park DriveWest Chester, OH 45069