Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

download Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

of 26

Transcript of Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    1/26

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    2/26

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    3/26

    The effort element is a measure of intensity ordrive. A motivated person tries hard. But highlevels of effort are unlikely to lead to favorable jobperformance

    We must consider the quality of the effort as wellas it intensity. Effort that is directed toward, andconsistent with, organizational goals

    Motivating high levels of employee performance isan important organizational problem, andmanagers keep looking for a solution

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    4/26

    Early Theories

    Three early theories of motivation

    Maslows hierarchy of needs

    McGregors Theories X and Y Herzbergs motivation-hygiene

    theory

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    5/26

    Contd.

    Maslows theory that there is ahierarchy of five human needs:

    physiological,

    safety,

    social,

    esteem, and

    self-actualization

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    6/26

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    7/26

    Maslow separated the five needs intohigher and lower levels;

    Lower order needs are physiologicaland security needs

    Higher order needs are Social,esteem and self-actualization.

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    8/26

    McGregors Theory X andTheory Y

    Theory X

    The assumption that employees dislikework, are lazy, avoid responsibility, and

    must be coerced to perform

    Theory Y

    The assumption that employees are

    creative, enjoy work, seek responsibility,and can exercise self-direction

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    9/26

    Contd.

    Theory X assumes that lower-orderneeds dominated individuals

    Theory Y assumes that higher-orderneeds dominated

    McGregor believed that assumptionsof theory Y were more valid thanthose of theoryX

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    10/26

    Herzbergs Motivation-HygieneTheory

    The motivation theory that intrinsicfactors are related to job satisfactionand motivation, whereas extrinsic

    factors are associated with jobdissatisfaction;

    He believes that individual attitude

    towards work determined success orfailure

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    11/26

    MOTIVATORS(Intrinsic factors; factors relating to job

    satisfaction) Achievement

    Recognition

    Work itself

    Responsibility

    Advancement

    Growth

    HYGIENE FACTORS

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    12/26

    HYGIENE FACTORSExtrinsic factors associated with job

    dissatisfaction Supervision

    Company policy

    Relationship with supervisor

    Relationship with peers

    Relationship with subordinates Working conditions

    Salary

    Status

    Security

    Personal life

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    13/26

    Contemporary Theories ofMotivation

    Three-Needs Theory

    Goal-Setting Theory

    Reinforcement Theory Designing Motivating Jobs

    Equity Theory

    Expectancy Theory

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    14/26

    THREE-NEEDS THEORY

    The motivation theory that says three acquired (notinnate) needs-achievement, power, and affiliation-are major motives in work

    (N-Ach)-The drive to excel, to achieve in relation to a

    set of standards, and to strive to succeed

    (N-Aff)The need to make others behave in a way thatthey would not have behaved otherwise

    (N-Pow)The desire for friendly and close

    interpersonal relationships

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    15/26

    GOAL-SETTING THEORY

    The proposition that specific goals increaseperformance and that difficult goals, whenaccepted, result in higher performance than doeasy goals

    An intention to work towards a goal is a majorsource of motivation

    Specific and challenging goals are superiormotivating forces; motivation is maximized by

    difficult goals whereas achievement motivationis stimulated by moderately challenging goals

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    16/26

    Reinforcement Theory

    The theory says that behavior is a function of itsconsequences

    Behavior is externally caused

    What controls behavior are reinforcers; Any

    consequence immediately following a responsethat increases the probability that the behaviorwill be repeated

    It ignores factors like goals, expectations andneeds; it focuses solely on what happens to aperson when he or she takes some action

    How managers use reinforcers to shape behavior

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    17/26

    B.F.Skinner explained thereinforcement theory ;

    People will most likely engage in desired

    behaviors if they are rewarded in doingso; these rewards are most effective ifthey immediately follow a desiredbehavior, and behavior that is notrewarded, or is punished, is less likely tobe repeated.

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    18/26

    Designing Motivating Jobs

    Managers are interested how to motivate people on thejob so they need to design a motivating job.

    Organization is composed of thousands of tasks and ifthese tasks are aggregated into jobs;

    Job design refers to the way tasks are combined toform complete jobs; Managers need to design the jobs deliberately and

    thoughtfully to reflect the demands of the changingcircumstances, the organizations technology, and itsemployees skills, abilities and preferences.

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    19/26

    Contd.

    Job Scope; The number of different tasks requiredin a job and the frequency with which those tasksare repeated.

    Job Enlargement; The horizontal expansion of a jobby increasing job scope

    Job Enrichment; The vertical expansion of a job byadding planning and evaluating responsibilities; itincreases job depth.

    Job depth; The degree of control employees haveover their work

    A framework for analyzing and designing jobs thatidentifies five primary job characteristics, theirinterrelationships, and their impact on outcomes

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    20/26

    Contd.

    Job Characteristics Model;

    A framework for analyzing and designing jobs thatidentifies five primary job characteristics, theirinterrelationships, and their impact on outcomes.

    Skill Variety; The degree to which a job requires a varietyof activities so that an employee can use a number ofdifferent skills and talents

    Task Identity; The degree to which a job requirescompletion of a whole and identifiable piece of work

    Task Significance; The degree to which a job has a

    substantial impact on the lives or work of other people

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    21/26

    Contd.

    Autonomy; The degree to which a jobprovides substantial freedom,independence, and direction to theindividual in scheduling work anddetermining the procedures to be used incarrying it out

    Feedback;The degree to which carrying

    out work activities required by a job resultsin the individuals obtaining direct and clearinformation about his or her performanceeffectiveness.

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    22/26

    Equity Theory

    Equity is related to the term of fairness and equaltreatment compared with others who behave in thesame ways.

    The theory that an employee compares his orher jobs input-outcomes ratio with that of relevantothers and then corrects any inequity

    J. Stacey Adams developed this theory and proposesthat employees perceive what they get from the jobsituation (outcome) in relation to what they put into

    it (inputs) and then compare their input-outcomes

    ratio with the input-outcomes ratios of relevantothers. If an employee perceives that his/her ratioto be equal to those of relevant others, a state ofequity exists.

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    23/26

    Expectancy Theory

    The theory that an individual tends toact in a certain way based on theexpectation that the act will be

    followed by a given outcome and onthe attractiveness of that outcome tothe individual.

    Individual EffortIndividualPerformanceorganizational RewardsIndividual Goals

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    24/26

    Contd.

    Victor Vrooms theory includes three variableor relationships; Expectancy or Effort-Performance linkage is the

    profitability perceived by the individual thatexerting a given amount of effort will lead to a

    certain level of performance Instrumentality or Performance-Reward Linkage is

    the degree to which the individual believes thatperforming at a particular level is instrumental inattaining the desired outcome.

    Vallence or Attractiveness of Reward is theimportance that the individual places on thepotential outcome or reward that can be achievedon the job.

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    25/26

    Integrating Contemporary Theories ofMotivation

    Many of the ideas underlying thetheories are complementary andtherefore, need to fit them together

    keeping the Expectancy Theory asbasic Foundation.

  • 8/14/2019 Copy of Motivating Employees 2003

    26/26

    Current Issues in Motivation

    Cross-Cultural Challenges Designing Appropriate Reward Programs

    Open-Book Management Employee Recognition Programs

    Pay-for-performance Stock Option Programs

    Motivating Unique Group of Workers Diverse Workforce

    Professionals Contingent Workers Low-Skilled, Minimum-Wage Employee s