Coordination HUB 29 July 2005 UNCLASSIFIED MPAT TE-8 Commanders Brief.
-
Upload
adelia-moore -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Coordination HUB 29 July 2005 UNCLASSIFIED MPAT TE-8 Commanders Brief.
Coordination HUBCoordination HUB
29 July 2005
UNCLASSIFIED
MPAT TE-8
Commanders BriefCommanders Brief
Scope
• Review Deliverables
• Organizational framework–Coordination Hub
• PKF Transition phases–Indicators for transition
Deliverables
Commander’s Guidance:< Develop CCC organization and procedures >• Unity of effort• Countries intent• UN/NGO/IO assessment• Facilitate coordination between military and
UN/NGO/IO
< Seamless transition from CTF to PKF >• Transitional Phases and Action
Co-ordination Hub- An Operating Framework
Facts
• Several players in the AO– CTF (Coalition forces)– Non-Coalition forces– UN, NGOs, IOs, etc.
• MNF SOP does not have a framework for Coalition Forces, Non-Coalition Forces and Civilian Organisations working together.
• Many IOs / NGOs will not necessarily come to a military coordination center of any sort as they:– View military support as an obstacle to their operations;
– May have no awareness of the military aspects of the situation*;
– May not see a need for any military support in their operations*.
Principles Applied in Peace Operations.(MNF SOP p. B7 B-13)
1. Continual military interaction with a wide variety of IOs and NGOs will make coordination of their activities difficult and challenging.
2. Unity of effort recognizes the need for a coherent approach to a common objective between the various military and civilian components of the PO.
3. Coordination with civilian agencies is facilitated by dialogue and consensus building and not by command.
4. Unity of effort can best be achieved by the development of a multifunctional multi-organizational planning approach.
5. Unity of effort at the strategic level requires close liaison between the Supported Strategic Commander / Lead Nation National Authorities and the UN Security Council.
6. Unity of effort at the operational and tactical levels requires close and frequent liaison between the military and civilian components of the PO.
The Need to for Coordination Hub
Military• Anticipate requests
for assistance (support and protection)
• Non-mil activities should be integrated, or at least deconflicted, with CTF operations
Non-Military
• Awareness of the military aspects of the situation
• Not necessarily come to a military coordination center
Principal Considerations
• One stop center for all stakeholders• Facilitate quicker decision-making &
Networked to enhance information sharing• Strives for “win-win” situation; avoiding
military domination; striving to enhance cooperation, coordination & UNITY OF EFFORT
• Seamless transition to commensurate with phases of operations
C1 – C7
Coordinating Hub
COALITION REPs
NON-COALITION REPs
UN,NGOs,IOs, etc
PL
AY
ER
SF
OR
UM
Note: The Forum Chairman must have a direct access to the CTF Commander to facilitate decision making process (possible options COS/DCS) . The Hub is 24/7 and conducted by staff of C7, supported by C3 and C5.
Conceptual Framework
Host, Key Figures
Civil-MilitaryINFO MGTOPS/INT
Joint Military Commission
(JMC)
Lead NationNon- Coalition Nation #1… x
CommanderCTF
Supported StrategicCommander
Participating Nation #2
Participating Nation #3
Participating NC Nation
#1..x
Coordinating Hub
(Forum)
HOC•UN•NGOs•IOs•CTF Liaison Offr
Others•Beneficiaries•POs
Non- Coalition
Rep
Participating Non-Coalition
NationCommander# 1..x
PL
AY
ER
SF
OR
UM
CMOCC1 – C7
Coordination Hub Concept
• The Coordination Hub is a forum that builds upon the following guiding principles:
• Sharing, co-ordination of efforts• One stop center where the military, NGOs, and
Humanitarian Organizations and beneficiaries of humanitarian activities coordinate hence establishing mutual support.
• Stakeholders are involved in planning hence there is consensus building, partnership creation leading to co-ownership and coherence of plans.
Coordination Hub Concept
• A Coordination Hub is a critical enabler for achieving coordinated and unified operations among the players in the Theater of Operations.
• A Coordination Hub is normally used to facilitate coordination, exchange of information, planning, and preparation of CTF and other forces to support humanitarian organizations’ activities.
• The composition of the Coordination Hub comprises staff of C3, C5 and C7 (CCC and CMOC) and UN Agencies, IOs, NGOs and beneficiaries.
NE
TW
OR
KE
DCo-ordination Hub
Co-ordination Forum Possible Chairman: COS / DCS Co-Secretariat by C3/C7
– Impetus: Co-ordinate the application of force and resources from the right source to the right people at the right place and time.
– Supported by an extensive network centric CCIS system – linkage to relief web. – CTF Liaison Officers will attend relevant UN meetings.Scope: 1. Security update2. Humanitarian situation update3. Host nation/faction rep requests4. Management and Prioritisation of RFA5. Ops Co-ordination.
End States/Outcomes
•Execution of Tasks/ Coordination of … Routes used, heli/air taskings, transportation, passage of lines, point-of-contact, time and space, convoy security, link-up pts, etc.
Military Co-ordination Forum
Coalition/Non-coalition members (C3, C5, or C7 led)
1. Security and situation update
2. Assets Management
3. Priorisation of RFA and Assets
4. Ops Co-ordination
5. CONOPS Co-ordination
Civilian Co-ordination Forum
UN agencies, IOs & NGOs, C7 Rep (OCHA or UN led)
1. Security and situation Update
2. Sector/functional co-ordination
3. Request for Assistance (RFA)
• Lift, movement, protection, etc
Information Management Forum
Coalition/Non-coalition mbers (C3 or CTF IO Chief)
1. Coord & Synch Opsec measures
2. Coord & Synch Info Theme(s)
3. Deconflict Info Challenges
4. Coord Info Dissem/Control measures
Host Nation / Faction Rep / Key Leaders
Possible Hub Cycle0001/1200
0600/1800
0900/2100 0300/1500
1000/2200
1100/23000100/1300
0200/1400
0500/1700
0400/16000800/2000
0700/1900
Mil
Coo
rd
Foru
m
Info Mgt Forum
Civ
il C
oord
Fo
rum
Hub Coord Forum
Potential Shortcomings
• More risk of civilian inputs– Cannot compromise military requirements– Implication to Ops critical
• Risk of much flexibility– Exercise control measures?
• Too many non-military entities– Lead agencies and credible NGOs only?
Transition Phases
Indicators for Transition
• Cease fire agreement enforced reduced fighting (MOE).
• Secure operating environment established.
• Buffer zones established.
• Transitional Federal Government functional.
• Civilian organisations operate independently.
Transition Phases
T
C2 Change Over Point
Deployment Phase
Initial Transition Phase
Key Transition Phase
CTF led
UN Support
1. Establishment and operation of Coordination Hub.
2. Lead Nation led.
3. Coalition, Non-coalition, UN, IOs, NGOs, Host/ Country Reps. Concentration
of forces
1. Mobilisation
2. National Training
3. Inter-ministry Co-ordination with UN
1. Execution of Tasks of Co-ordination Hub
2. Lead Nation led.
3. New members of Non-coalition forces and key members of IO/NGOs.
1. Force Integration Training (FMB)
1. Transition / situational awareness handover/ training
2. Exchange of functions, areas, information and C2 relationship
T -30T -60
Graduated Scaling Down of CTF forces
Transition Phases
T
C2 Change Over Point
Final Transition Phase Overwatch CTF Withdrawal
UN led
CTF Support
1. Transfer of leadership in Coordination Hub.
2. UN led.
3. Coalition, Non-coalition, UN, IOs, NGOs, Host/ Country Reps.
Graduated Scaling Down of CTF forces
1. Continued exchange of functions (MOE)
2. C2 Relationship
1. Execution of Tasks of Co-ordination Hub.
2. UN led.
3. New members of Non-coalition forces and key members of IO/NGOs.
1. Contingency Forces / Rapid Reaction Capability
1. CTF withdrawal mandate established
T+30T+20
Questions?
UNCLASSIFIED