Cooling in MI. Myocardial Protection and Preservation "Cell protection is the new challenge for...
-
Upload
justin-hubbard -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
2
Transcript of Cooling in MI. Myocardial Protection and Preservation "Cell protection is the new challenge for...
Cooling in MI
Myocardial Protection and Preservation
"Cell protection is the new challenge for patient management in coronary
care units, the catheterization laboratory, and the operating room,
broadening our management strategies for acute coronary
syndromes"
"Cell protection may be the next breakthrough in clinical cardiology"
Pierre Theroux (Circulation 2000:101: 2874-2876)
The Continuum of Carefor the Ischemic Myocardium
• Reperfusion is not enough• Protecting and preserving the
myocardium is the next evolution of care for these patients
Reperfusion(PCI, Lytics, Anti-thrombotic)
Mechanical Prevention/ Support(Filters, Traps, LVAD)
MyocardialProtection &Preservation(EndovascularTemperatureTherapy)
Regeneration(EGF, Angiogenesis)
PRESENT FUTURE
Metabolic Support &Myocardial Preservation
• There is considerable research that demonstrates that cooling to mildly hypothermic levels (32-33°C)*:– Reduces infarct size– Decreases myocardial and whole body
metabolism and 02 demand on ischemic myocardium
– Enhances ATP retention and prolongs tissue viability
– Reduces inflammatory response– Decreases platelet aggregation– Increases myocardial efficiency
* Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 2002; 285: H1584-91, Basic Res Cardiol 1998; 93: 372-83, Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 1996; 270: H1189-99, Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 1998; 274: H786-793, Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 1200-5, Thromb Haemost 1994; 71: 633-40, Basic Res Cardiol 2001; 86: 195-205
Endovascular Temperature Therapy in
MIGoal: Cell protection and preservation in
ischemic tissues
• No current therapies preserve cells. Focus has been on reperfusion and mechanical barriers, i.e. filters
• Cell death continues during and after reperfusion is established
• Closed loop, 10 Fr central venous heat exchange catheter 0ptimized for rapid cooling and warming
• Easy-to-use heat exchange cassette facilitates rapid initiation of therapy and patient transfer
• Easy-to-use second generation controller efficiently delivers thermal energy
• U.S. FDA 510(k) clearance in June, 2002 for use in cardiac surgery to achieve and/or maintain normothermia
Endovascular TemperatureTherapy System
TM
Cooling in MIPre-Clinical Evidence
Pre-Clinical ResearchTemperature & Infarct Size*
100
80
60
40
20
0
34 35 36 37 38 39 40
Infa
rct
Siz
e(%
of
Are
a at
Ris
k)
Body Core Temperature (º C)
y = 20x - 720r = 0.84, p < 0.001
* Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 1996; 270: H1189-99
Pre-Clinical ResearchEndovascular Cooling in MI*
• Study Design– 22 human sized swine with LAD ligation to
simulate MI– Randomized to endovascular cooling (34°
C) or normothermia (38° C) utilizing the Reprieve™ System
– Measured hemodynamics, area at risk and infarct size
• Heart rate, Systolic BP, Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output
• Blue dye to identify area at risk• TTC and sestamibi TC99m to measure infarct
size
* Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 2002; 285: H1584-91
Pre-Clinical ResearchEndovascular Cooling in MI*
Ligation Reperfusion
Cooling
1 hour 3 hours
Occlusion Reperfusion
Re-Occlusion
Blue DyeTTC & Sestamibi
HR, SBP, SV, CO
* Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 2002; 285: H1584-91
Pre-Clinical Research -Endovascular Cooling in MI*
Normothermic (Red) vs. Cooled (Blue) Temperature Plots
Note: Temperature is not dependent on open artery.
* Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 2002; 285: H1584-91
Pre-Clinical ResearchEndovascular Cooling in MI*
• Results– Cooling reduced infarct size by 80%
• Major protection occurred at target temp of 34°C
• No increase in arrhythmia
– Cardiac output maintained during ischemia and reperfusion• Decrease in heart rate• Increase in stroke volume
* Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 2002; 285: H1584-91
Pre-Clinical Research - Endovascular Cooling in MI*
Area at Risk & Infarct Size
Sestamibi
AAR/TTC
HypothermiaNormothermia
White area = infarcted tissue* Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 2002; 285: H1584-91
0
10
20
30
40
50
AAR (% LV) IF (% AAR)
%
Normothermia
Cooled
P = 0.6
P < .000001
Pre-Clinical Research - Endovascular Cooling in MI*
Area at Risk & Infarct Size
* Am J Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol 2002; 285: H1584-91
Cooling in MIThe COOL MI™ Feasibility
Trial
Systemic Hypothermia as an Adjunct
to Primary Angioplasty for Acute Myocardial Infarction*
Results of a Safety and Feasibility Study
SR Dixon, MBChB; RJ Whitbourn, MBBS, FRACP; Michael W. Dae, MD, FACC; Eberhard Grube, MD; Warren Sherman, MD,
FACC; Gary L. Schaer, MD, FACC; Stephen Jenkins, MD, FACC; Donald S. Baim, MD, FACC; Raymond J. Gibbons, MD, FACC;
Richard E. Kuntz, MD, FACC; Jeffrey J. Popma, MD, FACC; Thanh T. Nguyen, DO; William W. O'Neill, MD, FACC
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Clinical Sites
• St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Australia
• William Beaumont Hospital Royal Oak, MI
• Rush-Presbyterian-St.Luke’s Medical Center Chicago, IL
• Alton-Oschner Medical Center New Orleans, LA
• Beth Israel Medical Center New York, NY
• Brigham & Women's Hospital Boston, MA
• Stanford University Medical Center Palo Alto, CA
• Heart Center Siegburg Siegburg, Germany
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Study Objective
• To determine:– Feasibility and safety of endovascular
cooling in patients with acute MI undergoing
primary PCI– Feasibility of shivering management– Preliminary efficacy assessment
• Infarct size at 30-days with 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT imaging
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Study Design
42 PatientsKey Inclusion: Acute MI < 6 Hours, Anterior and Large Inferior MI’s
Key Exclusion: Prior MI < 1 month, Cardiogenic Shock, Hypersensitivity to cold or anti-shivering agents
42 PatientsKey Inclusion: Acute MI < 6 Hours, Anterior and Large Inferior MI’s
Key Exclusion: Prior MI < 1 month, Cardiogenic Shock, Hypersensitivity to cold or anti-shivering agents
PCI + Endovascular
Cooling
PCI + Endovascular
Cooling
PCI
Alone
PCI
Alone
Endpoints: In-hospital & 30-day MACE, SPECT Infarct size at 30 daysEndpoints: In-hospital & 30-day MACE, SPECT Infarct size at 30 days
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
COOL MI Feasibility Trial Endovascular Cooling
Protocol• Cooling initiated before PCI (in ER or cath
lab)
• Target temperature 33o C
• Cooling maintained for 3-hours after PCI
• Re-warming over 1-2 hours
• Core temperature monitored with naso-esophageal probe
• Skin warming (forced air blanket), oral buspirone and, intravenous meperidine used to prevent shivering
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Shivering Management
Skin Sensor
Management
Drug-Brain
Threshold
Endovascular
Temperature
Optimal Endovascular Therapy is dependent on successfully managing three interdependent
factors•Adequate dosing with Buspirone and Meperidine to reduce shivering threshold
•Use of warm air blanket to “fool” skin receptors
•Rate of cooling the core and temperature maintentance
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Patient Demographics*
Cooling (n=21)
Control (n=21)
Age 52 9 (39 - 73)
58 ± 14 (32 - 83)
Female 2 (10%) 5 (24%)Diabetes 4 (19%) 6 (29%)*Hypertension 5 (24%) 12 (57%)Hyperlipidemia 9 (43%) 5 (24%)Smoker 14 (67%) 11 (52%)Previous MI 3 (14%) 1 (5%)Previous PCI 1 (5%) 0Previous CABG 1 (5%) 0Anterior infarct 9 (40%) 10 (48%)Inferior infarct 12 (60%) 11 (52%)
*p=0.02*p=0.02* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Procedural Data*
Cooling (n=21)
Control (n=21)
PCI performed 20 (95%) 21 (100%)Door-to-balloon (mins)
87 ± 30 104 ± 44
Initial TIMI flow 0/1
16 (76%) 14 (67%)
2
0 3 (14%)
3
5 (29%) 4 (19%)
Stent 15 (71%) 16 (76%)AngioJet use 3 (14%) 4 (19%)GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor
15 (71%) 18 (86%)
Final TIMI-3 flow 19 (90%) 19 (90%)* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Core Temperature During Cooling*
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Hemodynamics During Cooling*
020406080
100120140160180
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240TIME (Mins)
Aos Aod HR
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
In-hospital Adverse Events*
Cooling (n=21)
Control (n=21)
DeathRecurrent MIRepeat PCICABGMACEStroke/TIACardiogenic shockPulmonary edemaVT/VFBradycardiaHematoma >6cmTransfusion
000
1 (5%)000
1 (5%)3 (14%)3 (14%)1 (5%)1 (5%)
2 (10%)0
2 (10%)0
2 (10%)0
2 (10%)0
6 (29%)4 (19%)
00
* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
Final Infarct Size at 30-days(Tc-99m SPECT)*
Control Test % Reduction
Median 8 2 75%
Mean 10.8 6.6 39%* JACC 2002; 40: 1928-34
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Infa
rct
Siz
e a
t 3
0 d
ay
s (
%L
V) TIMI 0-1
TIMI 2-3
Testn=18
Controln=18
TIMI 0-1 TIMI 2-3 Median Group Infarct Size
Assigned infarct size for patients who died
COOL MI Pivotal Trial
COOL MI Pivotal TrialSummary
Multi-center, prospective randomized study consisting of 400 patients at up to 25 sites
Designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of endovascular cooling as an adjunctive therapy to PCI in patients with AMI when compared to PCI alone
Adult patients with chest pain >30 min but <6 hrs, diagnosed with anterior or large inferior infarcts and eligible for primary PCI
Study Design
400 Patients
Key Inclusion: Acute MI >30 min and< 6 Hours, Anterior and Large Inferior MIs
Key Exclusion: Prior MI < 1 month, Cardiogenic Shock, Hypersensitivity to cold or anti-shivering agents
400 Patients
Key Inclusion: Acute MI >30 min and< 6 Hours, Anterior and Large Inferior MIs
Key Exclusion: Prior MI < 1 month, Cardiogenic Shock, Hypersensitivity to cold or anti-shivering agents
PCI + Endovascular Cooling
PCI + Endovascular Cooling
PCI AlonePCI
Alone
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: SPECT Infarct size at 30 days
Primary Safety Endpoint: MACE, all-cause mortality and adverse events
Secondary Endpoints: LVEF (using SPECT at 30 days), Cardiac Enzymes, Myocardial Blush, ST-segment resolution and hematological responses
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: SPECT Infarct size at 30 days
Primary Safety Endpoint: MACE, all-cause mortality and adverse events
Secondary Endpoints: LVEF (using SPECT at 30 days), Cardiac Enzymes, Myocardial Blush, ST-segment resolution and hematological responses
COOL MI Pivotal Trial Study Management
• Principal Investigator: William O’Neill, MD, Director Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital
• Data Management & Analysis: Harvard Clinical Research Institute (HCRI) – Richard Kuntz, MD
• Nuclear Imaging Core Laboratory: Mayo Clinic – Raymond Gibbons, MD
• Angiographic Core/Blush Laboratory: HCRI – Jeffrey Popma, MD
• ECG Core Laboratory: HCRI – Peter Zimetbaum, MD
COOL MI Pivotal Trial Summary
• Initial clinical results with endovascular temperature therapy in AMI support the pre-clinical findings of decreased infarct size.
• Pivotal trial initiated in late 2001, enrollment nearly complete as of 1/1/2003
• Results to be presented in 2003