Conventional Stormwater Management vs. LID · LID Tools: Reduce Impervious Areas Alternate roadway...
Transcript of Conventional Stormwater Management vs. LID · LID Tools: Reduce Impervious Areas Alternate roadway...
Conventional Stormwater Management vs. LID
Carmen Agouridis, Ph.D., P.E.Assistant Professor
Biosystems and Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of Kentucky
January 5, 2012
Overview
Philosophy of conventional stormwater management
Philosophy of LID
LID Tools
Benefits and limitations of each
Conventional (Gray) Stormwater Management
Collect
Convey
Concrete
Site Drainage
Quickly drain stormwater from site using curbs, gutters and pipes
Typically does not address water quality – high pollutant transport capacity
Off‐site Flood Control
Alteration to natural hydrology increases off‐site flooding potential
Primarily use detention basins to control peak flows for given storm size (e.g. 10 year) “End of pipe” control
approach
Hydrograph 1: Pre-development
Hydrograph 2: Post-development w/ no stormwater BMPs
Hydrograph 3: Post-development w/ conventional stormwater BMPs
Impact of Stormwater on Streams
LID Stormwater Management
Runoff volume control Increase in imperviousness = increase in runoff volume for a
given size storm
Peak runoff rate control Time of concentration
Time it takes flow to reach basin outlet from most hydraulically remote point in watershed
Water quality control Treatment of at least first ½ inch
of runoff via retention
LID Tools: Reduce Impervious Areas
Alternate roadway layout
Change road design Width
Permeable pavement
Rooftops Vertical vs. horizontal construction
Density
Driveways Sharing, limiting size, minimizing building setbacks, permeable
pavement
LID Tools: Minimize Connected Impervious Areas
Direct roof drain and driveway flows to vegetated areas
Encouraging sheet flow through vegetated areas
Break‐up flow directions from large paved areas
LID Tools: Increase Drainage Flow Paths
Factors affecting time of concentration Travel distance
Slope
Surface roughness
Maximize overland sheet flow
Use vegetated open swales
Remember …
Spread it
Slow it
Soak it
Store it
LID Techniques to Reduce Runoff Volume (Reduce Curve Number)
Limit use of s
idew
alks
Red
uce road le
ngth and w
idth
Red
uce drivew
ayleng
th and w
idth
Cons
erve natural re
source
sarea
s
Minim
izedisturba
nce
Prese
rve high
er in
filtrationso
ils
Prese
rve na
tural d
epression area
s
Use veg
etated swales
Prese
rve ve
getation
Land cover type X X X X
% Imperviousness X X X
Hydrologic soil group
X X
Natural hydrologic condition
X X X X X
Disconnectivity ofimpervious area
X X X
LID Techniques to Maintain Pre‐development Time of Concentration
LID Technique
LID Objective
On‐lot b
ioretention
Wider
and fla
tter
swales
Maintain sh
eet flow
Clusters of trees and
shrubs in flow path
Prov
ide tree
cons
erva
tion/tran
sitio
n zo
nes
Minim
ize storm drain
pipe
s
Disco
nnec
t impe
rvious
area
s
Save tree
s
Preserve existing
topo
grap
hy
Minimize disturbance
X X X X X X X X
Flatten grades X X XX
maybe
Reduce height of slopes
XX
maybe
Increase flow path(divert and redirect)
X XX
X X X
Increase roughness X X X X X X X
Hydrologic Parameter Conventional LID
Impervious cover Increased Minimized
Vegetation/naturalcover
Decreased Maximized
Time of concentration ShortenedMaximized;
predevelopmentconditions
Runoff volume IncreasedMinimized;
predevelopmentconditions
Peak dischargeControlled to design
storm
Minimized; predevelopment
conditions
Rainfall abstractions (interception,
infiltration, depression storage)
DecreasedMinimized;
predevelopmentconditions
Groundwater rechargeDecreased Minimized;
predevelopmentconditions
LID Considerations
Zoning and regulatory statutes Minimum street width and school buses, ambulances, and
garbage trucks
Safety concerns regarding ice formation
Mosquito concerns
Economics Building and maintenance costs
Who pays?
LID Considerations
Ownership of captured pollutants Heavy metal accumulation
Harvest vegetation
Periodic removal of mulch and media
Urban sprawl
Aesthetics