Fred Asiri 1

Conventional Facilities and SitingConventional Facilities and SitingGlobal Group (CFS)Global Group (CFS)

SLAC UpdateSLAC Update December 10, 2007

Acknowledgment: Jerry Aarons, Clay Corvin, and Esther Kweon

Fred Asiri 2

A Tentative CF&S Work Plan Approach for EDR

CF&S Work Plan_ By FY2011

Are

a &

Tec

hnic

al

Sys

tem

sC

F&

S

Kick off

Prepare Engineering

Requirements

Develop Functional RequirementsFinal RDR

CF&S Plan

Define Work

Packages

InitiateEDR

Document in Design Control Configuration

Document

Trade StudiesA,B,C..

Perform Work PackageA,B,C,..

Configuration Management

DCCD Review Cost

Estimate

Construct-ability Study

Concept Design

Document

Concept Design Must Be Based on Validated Requirements· Requirements should have a range;

Acceptable, Preferable, Desirable

FY07-Q3 FY07-Q4 FY08 FY09

DE

SY

Reviews

Update &RefineDCCD, CDD & the

Proposal

FY10

Establish Site CriteriaInitial EnvironmentalStudy

Proposal to consider FNAL as a Candidate

site

Rev

iew

Preliminary Site Characterization Study

Rev

iew

Fred Asiri 3

• Goal: To apply the first iteration cycle of the Work-Plan, focusing on e- Sources, Beam Delivery and Interaction Region

• Approach: Will be based on Systems Engineering Management – Define physics functional requirements

• Identify the range; Acceptable, Preferable, Desirable

– Define boundaries, interfaces, utility needs and functional environment

– Define physics requirement to an engineering requirements

– Initiate a CFS Design Configuration Control Document

– Put under Interface Control

– Identify Optimization Studies• Design Alternatives Trade-Offs• Trade Studies• Constructability Studies• Value Analysis Studies

A Tentative CF&S Work Plan Approach for EDR

Fred Asiri 4

• All three regions contributed to the following CFS All three regions contributed to the following CFS accomplishments:accomplishments:– An overall Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for the CE/CF An overall Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) for the CE/CF

effort was developed that reflected work required for the effort was developed that reflected work required for the development of the EDR .development of the EDR .

– The WBS were prioritized and the highest priority items were The WBS were prioritized and the highest priority items were then developed into CE/CF work packages with suggested then developed into CE/CF work packages with suggested milestones and completion dates. milestones and completion dates.

– Project Management Plan (PMP) with milestones for the Project Management Plan (PMP) with milestones for the highest priority work packages was developed and submitted highest priority work packages was developed and submitted to the Project Management Group.to the Project Management Group.

– An initial comprehensive Area System criteria list was An initial comprehensive Area System criteria list was developed. developed.

– This criteria list will be used, with necessary adjustments, to This criteria list will be used, with necessary adjustments, to collect data from all of the Area Systems in the coming collect data from all of the Area Systems in the coming months and will serve as the basis for the EDR CFS designmonths and will serve as the basis for the EDR CFS design

Activities Update Since November 5, 07

Fred Asiri 5

• The points of contact will be the primary focus for the The points of contact will be the primary focus for the gathering of criteria. Those primary responsibilities gathering of criteria. Those primary responsibilities are: are:

– 2.2.1.4 - T. Lackowski2.2.1.4 - T. Lackowski Main Linac - T. Lackowski with A. EnomotoMain Linac - T. Lackowski with A. Enomoto

– 2.2.1.5 - J. Osborne2.2.1.5 - J. Osborne e- Source - G. Aaronse- Source - G. Aarons

e+ Source - J. Osbornee+ Source - J. OsborneDamping Ring - T. Lackowski with A. JacksonDamping Ring - T. Lackowski with A. Jackson

RTML - FNAL person to be determined RTML - FNAL person to be determined

– 2.2.1.5 - F. Asiri2.2.1.5 - F. Asiri BDS - F. AsiriBDS - F. Asiri Interaction RegionInteraction Region - J. Osborne - J. Osborne

Activities Update Since November 5, 07

Fred Asiri 6

Activities Update Since November 5, 07• Following is an excerpts from BDS –CFS criteria spreadsheet: Following is an excerpts from BDS –CFS criteria spreadsheet:

Beam Delivery-CFS Requirements DRAFT 11/27/2008

Date Required WP Beam Line Tunnel Requirements

Plan and Section Space Requirements

Description of insitu beamline componentsBeam Component LayoutPlan and cross section dimensions of major componentsMaximum Beam Component WeightsStand Configuration / Space usage

Dumps Location and configuration including beam scriptSize Access, Shielding

Cable and bus bar, if anyNumber and size of cable trays for each major areaBus Size & relationship to Beam Elements

Stability Requirements at tunnel floorPenetrations to Service Tunnel

Number, size , purposeShielding requirements for penetrations

Review and Concurrence of layouts

Life Safety/Radiation

Occupancy (between exit discharge (shafts))During InstallationDuring Maintenance

Will all cables by Halogen-FreeFlammable gases or Off GasesWater Activation

Flowing waterStationary water (sprinklers)

Comments/Contact PersonCriteriaThe form that the information requested below is provided can vary. The information is to establish the scope and criteria for establishing the space requirements required to install and operate the accellerator. Information can be transmitted and is prefered as a link to EDMS, but please remember to inform us when changes that will affect the design are made.

The intention of this section is to

Fred Asiri 7

• All three regions contributed to the following CFS All three regions contributed to the following CFS accomplishments, continued:accomplishments, continued:– A review of the CFS cost estimate was initiated at the GDE Meeting A review of the CFS cost estimate was initiated at the GDE Meeting

held at Fermilab in October, 2007. held at Fermilab in October, 2007. – Additional work was conducted in the weeks that followed.Additional work was conducted in the weeks that followed.– The result is:The result is:

• A CFS cost estimate that has been reconciled between the three A CFS cost estimate that has been reconciled between the three regions, regions,

• Is consistent with the information contained in the Reference Is consistent with the information contained in the Reference Design Report and adjusted to correct minor discrepancies that Design Report and adjusted to correct minor discrepancies that had been identified by the Cost and Scheduling Grouphad been identified by the Cost and Scheduling Group

– The first in a series of value management reviews was organized, in The first in a series of value management reviews was organized, in conjunction with consultants from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineersconjunction with consultants from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers

• Goal; to identify options for value improvement and cost reduction Goal; to identify options for value improvement and cost reduction with respect to the ILC Main Linac process cooling water system. with respect to the ILC Main Linac process cooling water system.

• The review was held at Fermilab, Nov 27-29, with international The review was held at Fermilab, Nov 27-29, with international participation both in-person and by Video.participation both in-person and by Video.

Activities Update Since November 5, 07

Fred Asiri 8

• Main Linac Value Management Workshop-11/07Main Linac Value Management Workshop-11/07– Workshop to comprehensively examine the power and

cooling system requirements and design solutions leading to ideas that will reduce the connected power, power usage and operating costs for the project

– Followed U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Format– Agenda and presentations at:

http://ilcagenda.linearcollider.org/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=2328 – Concentrated on largest power user, the Main Linac– examined all aspects of the technical equipment and

conventional equipment as it relates to power and cooling– Speculation Phase -> Functional Analysis Phase (FAST

Diagrams) -> Development Phase Planning

Activities Update Since November 5, 07

Fred Asiri 9

Activities Update Since November 5, 07

Fred Asiri 10

Activities Update Since November 5, 07• Functional analysis methodologyFunctional analysis methodology

– How ; Why ; when

Fred Asiri 11

Activities Update Since November 5, 07

• Close-out– Over 50 items

prioritized– Top 13 listed

were developed into Work Packages

– 13 WP Proposals to be bid on by Labs or others

Fred Asiri 12

• Anticipated work in the coming months:Anticipated work in the coming months:– Generate and distribute criteria lists to all Area Generate and distribute criteria lists to all Area

Systems (tailored as needed for general as well as Systems (tailored as needed for general as well as area specific criteria).area specific criteria).

– Establish EDR points-of–contact with all Area Establish EDR points-of–contact with all Area Systems and Technical Systems as needed.Systems and Technical Systems as needed.

– Continue to develop CE/CF plan for EDR definition Continue to develop CE/CF plan for EDR definition and completion for presentation at the GDE and completion for presentation at the GDE Meeting in March, 2007 with consideration for Meeting in March, 2007 with consideration for available resources and work package available resources and work package assignments.assignments.

– The CFS Group will explore with CERN issues The CFS Group will explore with CERN issues common to the ILC and CLIC projects that have common to the ILC and CLIC projects that have strong mutual interest and overlap in the strong mutual interest and overlap in the Conventional Facilities area.Conventional Facilities area.

Activities Update Since November 5, 07

Fred Asiri 13

A Tentative CF&S Timeline for EDR

CFS 2008 2009Functional Requirements and Value Engineering N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M

2.1.1.1 - Development and consolidation of baselinetemplate - Functional requirements XFunctional requirements complete - Main linac XFunctional requirements complete -BDS IR XFunctional requirements complete - Sources, DR, RTML X

CFS - Update RDR design X

2.2.2 Cost and Schedule DevelopmentProcess water value engineering - Main linac XUnderground Space usage – Main linac XAir Handling – all areas XUnderground Space usage – non-linac XSurface buildings XElectrical – all areas XProject Schedule X