Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South...

46
Developed by: Pamela E. Aeppel, MA Shawna Thomas, BA University of South Florida Child Welfare Training Consortium Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?

Transcript of Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South...

Page 1: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Developed by:

Pamela E. Aeppel, MA

Shawna Thomas, BA

University of South Florida

Child Welfare Training

Consortium

Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?

Page 2: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Welcome all…Let’s talk about coaching

others, shall we?

Page 3: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Who do we have in the room?

Who are YOU?

Supervisors? Judges?

GALs? Administrators?

CPT? Attorneys?

Clinicians? CPIs?

Trainers? Case Managers?

Page 4: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Objective:

• Classify how coercing and controlling

behaviors are distinguished from

coaching behaviors in child welfare

work.

Page 5: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Objective:

• Differentiate approaches when

coaching others that is neither coercive

nor controlling.

Page 6: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Objective:

• Identify and demonstrate strategies that

are tied to a constructive performance

driven cognitive and action oriented

behavior change.

Page 7: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Is it telling what to do?

Is it taking over?

Is it showing?

How far do you go to

“coach” and what does

that look like?

What is Coaching?

Page 8: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

What is the distinction between

coaching and controlling and/or

coercing others to “do” it YOUR

way?

Page 9: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Definition of Control:

• To exercise restraining or directing

influence over.

• To have power over.

Synonyms:

Constrain, Contain,

Curb, Govern, Hold,

Inhibit, Restrain, Rule.

Page 10: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Definition of Coerce:

• To restrain or dominate.

• To compel to an act or choice.

• To achieve by force or threat.

Synonyms:

Force, Compel, Constrain,

Dragoon, Impel, Muscle,

Obligate, Pressure, Press

Page 11: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Definitions of Coaching:

A person who trains, directs and gives instruction.

(condensed version) – American Heritage Dictionary

Helping successful leaders achieve positive, lasting

change in behavior for themselves, their people and

their teams. – Marshall Goldsmith

Page 12: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Definitions of Coaching:

Unlocking a person’s potential to

maximize his or her own performance.

– John Whitmore

The art of facilitating the unleashing of people’s potential to

reach meaningful, important objectives. – Phillipe Rosinski

Page 13: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Coaching Strategies

• Attitude

• Approach

• Action

Page 14: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

What kind of Coaching

is advocated for in

Social Services?

Page 15: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

The Humanistic Guide to Coaching

Principle 1: The Nature of the Coaching Relationship is

Essential.

• Listen for understanding.

• Cultivate acceptance and look for positive points of

connection.

• Give honest feedback in the moment.

• Establish collaboration as the process of the coaching

relationship.

Reference: Grant, Anthony M, Stober, Dianne R. Evidence Based Coaching Handbook

Page 16: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

The Humanistic Guide to Coaching

Principle 2: The Individual being Coached is the Source

and Director of Change.

• Facilitate the individual to set the agenda, goals, and

direction.

• Use the self-subject matter expertise of the individual

as the point of connection.

Reference: Grant, Anthony M, Stober, Dianne R. Evidence Based Coaching Handbook

Page 17: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

The Humanistic Guide to Coaching

Principle 3: The Individual being Coached is Whole and

Unique.

• Assess thoroughly and check for accuracy.

• Look for interconnections.

• Facilitate integrating/aligning.

Reference: Grant, Anthony M, Stober, Dianne R. Evidence Based Coaching Handbook

Page 18: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

The Humanistic Guide to Coaching

Principle 4: The Coach is the Facilitator of the Individual’s

Growth.

• Direct the process, not the content.

• Maintain an attitude of exploration.

• Expand the person’s awareness of strengths,

resources, challenges.

• Point out choices to help facilitate conscious choices.

• Facilitate goal-setting and accountability.

Reference: Grant, Anthony M, Stober, Dianne R. Evidence Based Coaching Handbook

Page 19: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

The ACE Cycle of Change

Awareness Choice Execution

Page 20: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Characteristics of

Coaching:

• Coaching is a deliberate process using focused

conversations to create an environment for individual

growth, purposeful action and sustained

improvement.

• Coaching is generally a one to one relationship.

• Usually involves gathering and sharing feedback for

the person being coached.

• Depends primarily on supportive rather than directive

communication from the coach.

Reference---Homan, Madeleine, and Linda J. Miller. Coaching in Organizations: Best Coaching Practices from Ken Blanchard and

Companies.

Page 21: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

What about Strengths Based

Coaching?

Page 22: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

What is a Strength?

Page 23: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

A Strength is:

“A naturally recurring pattern of thought,

feeling or behavior that can be productively

applied.”

(Clifton & Anderson, 2002).

Page 24: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Approach to Coaching

“The art of creating an environment, through

conversation and a way of being, that facilitates the

process by which a person can move toward desired

goals in a fulfilling manner.” – Gallwey (2002, The Inner

Game Approach).

Page 25: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Should we change our approach

from “Problem” Focused to

Strength Focused?

Page 26: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Coaching Forces us to Think of

People - Not just Problems!

As a coach to each other,

the focus must be on

developing, empowering

and encouraging others,

as opposed to simply

“fixing” the case scenario,

legal intervention or

agency conflict in front of

us!

Page 27: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Coaching means:

We shift from “problem focused” to

“potential-guided” and “solution focused.”Reference: Linley and Harrington, International Coaching Psychology Review, 2006

Page 28: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Non Directive and Person

Centered Approach to Coaching

A Coach is a keen observer of the ebb and flow of

the coaching conversation, being finely attuned to

the subtle nuances of language and emotion that

might indicate the presence of a strength.

Page 29: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Non Directive and Person

Centered Approach to Coaching

The Coach chooses to reflect conversations back

to raise the strength, explore, develop, refine and

help with application of the strength. – Joseph & Linley

Page 30: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Pragmatic Application and

Application of Strength Based

Coaching

Some strengths can only be seen in context of the

environment and are not seen unless the

opportunity is created and the environment is

conducive to the display of the strengths.

Page 31: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Creating a “Coaching” environment

in an agency requires:

• Seeing people as capable.

• Developing people as a

priority.

• Viewing errors as

opportunities instead of

“gotcha” moments.

• Giving feedback with a

forward–focus.

Page 32: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

How do you use your skills in Child

Welfare to Coach others?

• Use your interview skills

• Use your questioning

skills

• Use your affirmation

skills

• Use behaviorally

specific feedback

Page 33: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Evoking Change Talk in Coaching

Circumstances:

• Evocative Questions: Open – Ended

• Elaborating Questions: Clarifying: “In what

ways?” Asking for specific examples. Asking for

descriptions.

• Querying Extremes: Extremes of concerns.

Best consequences and worst consequences?

Page 34: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Coaching is: Therapy is:

• Concerned with action and

how tasks get done and

work is accomplished.

• Has a focus on

performance at work.

• Can be delivered in a one

to one, peer to peer or

group format.

• More introspective and

focused on the “why.”

• More focused on personal

crisis and problems.

• Usually in a one to one

interaction only.

What is the Difference?

Page 35: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

What is the Difference between

Coaching and Supervision?

Coaching is: Supervision is:

Goal Oriented. Process Oriented, through

systemic review.

Evolves from a more

accepted mutual

relationship.

Is defined by the mutual

obligation within the

supervision process.

Creating solutions with

the “coachee” rather than

“telling” what to do.

The supervisor can and will

tell the employee what to

do.

Page 36: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Coaching requires the ability

to provide effective feedback.

Page 37: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Effective Feedback:

• Effective communication and

interpersonal rapport

between coach and coachee.

• The coach is seen as

credible.

• The feedback message is

behaviorally based.

• The coach believes in the

ability of coachee to change.

Page 38: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Ineffective Feedback:

• No goals or insufficiently

specified goals have been

identified and pursued.

• The coach lacks credibility.

• The coach is reluctant to

provide constructive and

specific feedback.

• The feedback message is

threatening and personal.

Page 39: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

There are many feedback models

to use in Coaching.

Let’s look at a simple feedback

strategy to apply!

Page 40: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

• What did they

do?

• Provide the

facts.

• Be

specific/non-

emotional.

• Describe the

impact of the

actions.

• Encourage

coachee to identify

change and

describe what

could have been

done differently.

• Reinforce and

affirm.

EEC Feedback Strategy in Coaching:

Example/Fact Effect/Impact Change

Page 41: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Let’s Practice your

Coaching Skills!

Page 42: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

Verbal Volley Game and Wrap Up

Page 43: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”
Page 44: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

References and Citations:

Strengths Coaching: A potential-guided approach to coaching psychology: P. Alex Linley and

Susan Harrington, International Coaching Psychology Review-Vol. 1, April 2006. The British

Psychological Society 2006 2006-ISSN: 1750-2764.

Performance Coaching Skills for Social Work; Jane Holroyd and Richard Field, SAGE Publications.

2012

Evidence Based Coaching Handbook; Dianne R. Stober, Anthony M. Grant, Editors, John Wiley &

Sons, Inc. 2006

Coaching for Performance (4th Edition); John Whitmore; 2004-2009 published; Nicholas Brealey

Publishing

Child Welfare Matters: Coaching in Child Welfare; Summer 2012; National Child Welfare Resource

Center for Organizational Improvement, Edmund S. Muskie School of Public Service, University of

Southern Maine.

Strengths based Leadership, Great Leaders, Teams and Why People Follow; Tom Rath and Barry

Conchie; Gallup Press; 2008.

Page 45: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

“Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?” 2015 Dependency Summit, Orlando, Florida

9/9/15

Facilitated by:

Pamela E. Aeppel, MA Shawna Thomas, BA

USF Child Welfare Training Consortium

Humanistic Guide to Coaching Principle 1: The nature of the coaching relationship is essential. Principle 2: The individual being coached is the source and director of their own change. Principle 3: The individual being coached is whole and unique. Principle 4: The coach is the facilitator of the individual’s growth. ACE cycle of change:

Use your questioning techniques to prime for critical thinking with the “coachee” just like we do when we work with families:

Use of evocative questions: Open-Ended

Use of elaborating questions: Clarifying: “In what ways would you…? “How would you_ _ _ ?”

Use of querying extremes: “What is the best outcome if you _ __ _ _” “What would be the worst outcome if you _ _ _ _ _?”

Benefits of Feedback

Reduces uncertainty

Proposes solutions to challenges

Builds Trust

Strengthens relationships

Improves work quality

Reinforces behavior

Aligns expectations and priorities

Fills in gaps in knowledge

Allows for revisions in action

Alleviates fears of the unknown

Choice

Execution

Awareness

Strength based coaching presumes people are capable, can be seen in context of opportunity within the work environment and builds upon an individual’s potential, as opposed to a “problem focused” perception of the individual or their behavior.

Page 46: Controlling, Coercing or Coaching? - University of South Floridacenterforchildwelfare.fmhi.usf.edu/Training/2015cpsummit... · 2015-08-26 · “Controlling, Coercing or Coaching?”

A Feedback Model for “coaching” others:

“EEC”: Example/Effect/Change

Example/Fact—What did they do? Provide facts Be specific/non-emotional

Effect/Impact: Describe the impact of the actions

Change: Encourage “coachee” to identify change and describe what could have been done differently. Reinforce/Affirm

Providing coaching feedback to others requires you to work at:

Credibility--- not as an expert with everything, but instead as someone who wants others to achieve their goals and succeed.

A solution focused approach with the coachee and avoidance of “gotcha” mentality!

Being goal oriented, as to the purpose of your relationship with the coachee and transparency about role clarity.

External Barriers to Coaching frequently seen, heard and/or verbalized: The agency culture is against this type of approach! People are cynical of any new approach. “They” will think it is just a new management gimmick. It takes too long---I don’t have time to coddle my staff. “They” want to be told what to do—they don’t want responsibility. I’ll lose my authority if I try to talk like that! I am the expert and they expect me to have all the answers. I know how to talk to my people---I don’t need to change anything. I don’t believe in this new “warm and fuzzy” way of doing things. Benefits of Coaching: Improved performance and productivity Staff development Improved learning Improved relationships More supervisory time due to less reliance on micromanagement of every task Better use of people, skills and resources Faster and more effective emergency responses Better flexibility and adaptability to change More motivated staff who are able to do deeper levels of critical thinking

References & Sources

Strengths Coaching: A potential-guided approach to coaching psychology: P. Alex Linley and Susan Harrington, International Coaching Psychology Review-

Vol. 1, April 2006. The British Psychological Society 2006 2006-ISSN: 1750-2764.

Performance Coaching Skills for Social Work; Jane Holroyd and Richard Field, SAGE Publications. 2012

Evidence Based Coaching Handbook; Dianne R. Stober, Anthony M. Grant, Editors, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2006

Coaching for Performance (4th Edition); John Whitmore; 2004-2009 published; Nicholas Brealey Publishing

Child Welfare Matters: Coaching in Child Welfare; Summer 2012; National Child Welfare Resource Center for Organizational Improvement, Edmund S.

Muskie School of Public Service, University of Southern Maine.

Strengths based Leadership, Great Leaders, Teams and Why People Follow; Tom Rath and Barry Conchie; Gallup Press; 2008.