Contracts genuineness business law

13
1 Contracts Genuineness of Assent

description

Contracts genuineness business law

Transcript of Contracts genuineness business law

Page 1: Contracts genuineness business law

1

Contracts Genuinenessof Assent

Page 2: Contracts genuineness business law

2

Introduction

Contract may be unenforceable if the parties have not genuinely assented to its terms by: Mistake. Misrepresentation. Undue Influence. Duress.

Page 3: Contracts genuineness business law

3

§1: Mistakes of Fact

Only a Mistake of Fact allows a contract to be canceled.

Bilateral (Mutual) Mistakes can be rescinded by either party.

Unilateral Mistakes cannot be canceled unless: If other party to the contract knows or should have known

that a mistake of fact was made. If mistake was due to mathematical mistake in addition,

summation, subtraction, division, or multiplication and was made inadvertently and without gross negligence.

Page 4: Contracts genuineness business law

4

Mistakes of Value

Generally, contract is enforceable by either party.

Exception: Mistake of value because of a mistake of material fact.

Page 5: Contracts genuineness business law

5

§2: Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Contract Voidable by Innocent Party. Elements:

Misrepresentation of Material Fact. Intent to Deceive. Reliance on Misrepresentation. Injury to the Innocent Party.

Page 6: Contracts genuineness business law

6

Misrepresentation Has Occurred

Misrepresentation can be express or implied. Concealment. Misrepresentation of future facts and statements

of opinion are not fraud, unless person professes to be an expert.

Misrepresentation of Law is not fraud, unless person has greater knowledge of the law.

Silence is not fraud, unless serious problem or defect known or asked and person lied.

Case 13.1: Vokes v. Arthur Murray Inc. (1968).

Page 7: Contracts genuineness business law

7

Intent to Deceive

Scienter is an Intent to Deceive. Party knowledge that fact is not as stated. Party makes a reckless statement with disregard

of the truth. Party implies that statement is based on personal

knowledge or investigation. Gross negligence is considered intent. Case 13.2: Sarvis v. Vermont State Colleges

(2001).

Page 8: Contracts genuineness business law

8

Reliance on Misrepresentation

Deceived party must have Justifiable Reliance. Depends on the knowledge and experience of the

party relying.

Case 13.3: Folet v. Parlier (2002).

Page 9: Contracts genuineness business law

9

Injury to the Innocent Party

No proof of injury is required when the action is to rescind contract.

Proof of injury is universally required to recover damages.

Page 10: Contracts genuineness business law

10

§3: Nonfraudulent Misrepresentation

Innocent Misrepresentation. Negligent Misrepresentation.

Equal to Scienter. Is treated as fraudulent misrepresentation, even

though the misrepresentation was not purposeful.

Page 11: Contracts genuineness business law

11

§4: Undue Influence

Contract is Voidable. Confidential or Fiduciary Relationship. Relationship of dependence. Influence or Persuasion. Weak party talked into doing something not

beneficial to him or herself.

Presumption of Undue Influence.

Page 12: Contracts genuineness business law

12

§5: Duress

Forcing a party to enter into a contract under fear or threat makes the contract voidable.

Threatened act must be wrongful or illegal. Improper Threat.

Threat to exercise legal rights (criminal or civil suit).

Economic or physical.

Page 13: Contracts genuineness business law

13

§6: Adhesion contracts and Unconscionability

Adhesion Contracts. Preprinted contract in which the adhering party has

no opportunity to negotiate the terms of the contract.

Unconscionability. One sided bargains in which one party has

substantially superior bargaining power and can dictate the terms of the contract. “Standard-form.” “Take-it-or-leave-it” adhesion contracts.