Contract strategy Traditional ApproachIncreasing Traditional ApproachIncreasing Accelerated...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
5
Transcript of Contract strategy Traditional ApproachIncreasing Traditional ApproachIncreasing Accelerated...
Contract strategy
Traditional ApproachTraditional Approach IncreasingIncreasing Accelerated TraditionalAccelerated Traditional integrationintegration Management ContractingManagement Contracting of designof design Construction ManagementConstruction Management andand Project ManagementProject Management constructionconstruction Design and Build/TurnkeyDesign and Build/Turnkey Build Operate TransferBuild Operate Transfer
CONSULTANTSCONSULTANTS THE THE CLIENT’S CLIENT’S and/or MINISTRYand/or MINISTRY CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION OWN OWN of WORKSof WORKS PROJECT PROJECT
RESOURCESRESOURCES
SUBCON-SUBCON- CON- CON- SUPPLIERSSUPPLIERS TRACTORSTRACTORS TRACTORSTRACTORS
Procurement : the acquisition of project resources
1. Client concern to1. Client concern to 2. Competitive tendering 2. Competitive tendering ‘ ‘get the best deal’get the best deal’ for all aspects of the for all aspects of the projectproject 5. Increase surveillance5. Increase surveillance and control systemsand control systems
4. Contractor/professional4. Contractor/professional 3. Reduction in expected 3. Reduction in expected opportunistic behaviour opportunistic behaviour profit for contractor/ profit for contractor/ directed at increasingdirected at increasing professionals professionals expected profitexpected profit
Vicious circles in construction procurement
Organisation theory and the project process
InterdependenceInterdependence
Differentiation & specialisationDifferentiation & specialisation
Integration & coordinationIntegration & coordination
Universal vs contingency approachesUniversal vs contingency approaches
appointmentappointment appointmentappointment consultantsconsultants main contractormain contractor
designingdesigning + + constructingconstructing GENERICGENERIC
The traditional approach
appointmentappointment design and construct companydesign and construct company
tendering tendering designing designing constructing constructing
The design-and-construct approach
appointmentappointment appointmentappointment consultantsconsultants specialist contractorsspecialist contractors
designingdesigning tenderingtendering earthworkearthwork frameworkframework mechanical work mechanical work electrical workelectrical work completioncompletion
The divided contract approach
Selection Process Selection Process
ExerciseExercise
Draw up a list of criteria that a Draw up a list of criteria that a typicaltypical client client might have in selecting a procurement path.might have in selecting a procurement path.
What were/are the criteria of the client on What were/are the criteria of the client on your current project?your current project?
A comparison of USA and UK practice
USA practice
Client
C.M.
Design Construction
Client
C.M.
Design
Principalarchitect
Q.S.
Construction
UK practice
Construction Construction Management Design and Management Design and Design,Design, managementmanagement contracting contracting manage manage andmanage manage and constructconstruct
ProfessionalProfessional Contractoral Contractoral
The range of management systems and their professional contract
Management contracting systems
Construction management
Constructionmanager
Designorganisation
Workscontractors
Client
(a)
Management contracting
Management contractorDesign
Works contractors
Client
(b)
Management contracting systems (cont)
Design and manage
Design and managecontractor
ScopeDesigners
Client
(c)
DesignersWorks
contractors
Design, manage and construct
Design, manage andconstruct contractor
ScopeDesigners
Client
(d)
DesignersWorks contractors(portion of works)
Criteria for your projectCriteria for your project
timingtiming
variationvariation
complexitycomplexity
qualityquality
price certaintyprice certainty
competitioncompetition
division of responsibilitydivision of responsibility
professional responsibilityprofessional responsibility
risk avoidancerisk avoidance
Contract strategy variables
Overlap of project phasesOverlap of project phases Contractor selection processContractor selection process Source of project financeSource of project finance Contract documentsContract documents Leadership / AuthorityLeadership / Authority
Organisation formOrganisation form Payment methodPayment method
Selection Exercise Selection Exercise
Using the chart in “Thinking about Building” select Using the chart in “Thinking about Building” select a contract strategy for your current project.a contract strategy for your current project.
Is the path with the highest score the one that you Is the path with the highest score the one that you actually chose?actually chose?
If not, why not?If not, why not?
Construction contracts
FlexibilityFlexibility
Price to be paidPrice to be paid
The fallacy of cost certaintyThe fallacy of cost certainty
Release of controlRelease of control
Comparisons Comparisons
Pros & ConsPros & Cons
TraditionalTraditional
Design BuildDesign Build
ManagementManagement
Comparisons - Traditional Comparisons - Traditional
Advantages Competitive tendering; Bill of quantities makes for ease of valuation of varieties; High quality and functional standards; Cost certainty at start of construction; Independent advice on most aspects of the process; Clear lines of accountability; Combination of best design and construction skills possible; Flexibility for design changes.
Comparisons - Traditional Comparisons - Traditional
Disadvantages
Slow and convoluted decision processes; Total project time longest of all options; Low levels of buildability; Many organisational interfaces to be managed.
Comparisons - Design build Comparisons - Design build
Advantages
Single point responsibility;Integration of design and construction;Fixed price bids;High levels of buildability;Short total project times;Client involvement in the process can be minimised;Package deal systems offer off-the-shelf solutions;Competition on price and product.
Comparisons - Design build Comparisons - Design build
Disadvantages
Lack of independent advice;Valuation of variations Detailed brief at outset;High levels of buildability;Changes can be expensiveClient control of quality is minimised;Tender process can be expensive ;Lower levels of competition at tender.
Comparisons:DB Organisation Comparisons:DB Organisation
O :BuilderQ :QSEo :Services EngineerI :Structural Enginr :Architect
* :Sub-contractor PURE DESIGN BUILD
INTEGRATED DESIGN BUILD
FRAGMENTED DESIGN BUILD
Comparisons - Management Comparisons - Management
Advantages
Early start to construction work;Quick total project times;Value management and buildability ;Flexibility for change;Competition for each work package;Increased specialisation of trades contractor inputs;Extra layer of management leads to strong organisation ;In-depth planning of the whole process.
Comparisons - Management Comparisons - Management
Disadvantages
No firm price at start of construction;Complicated contractual relations and unclear liability;Extra layer of management leads to extra costs;Client must be deeply involved ;Conducive to “buck-passing”;Risk taken by client;Conflict between professional participants ;Changed roles.
Comparisons Comparisons
Time vs CostTime vs Cost
TraditionalTraditional
Design BuildDesign Build
ManagementManagement
Selection Processes Selection Processes
Mini-assignmentMini-assignment
Write a 2500 word report outlining a Write a 2500 word report outlining a methodology for selecting a contract methodology for selecting a contract strategy. This should be written from the strategy. This should be written from the perspective of an advisor to a prospective perspective of an advisor to a prospective client.client.
Submit by March, 2003Submit by March, 2003