Contract Drafting Class 7 University of Houston Law Center Feb. 8, 2011 D. C. Toedt III.
-
Upload
octavia-hopkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Contract Drafting Class 7 University of Houston Law Center Feb. 8, 2011 D. C. Toedt III.
Contract DraftingClass 7
University of Houston Law Center
Feb. 8, 2011
D. C. Toedt III
Today’s class
Coming soon ….
In the news
Passive voice exercise
Letters of intent / prenegotiation agreements
Confidentiality agreements (“NDAs”) (if time permits)
In the news:
“Material” contract? Might have to be filed w/ SEC, available on EDGAR
News commentator is asked “will it work?” How should he respond if he thinks “no!”?
In the news:
U.S. cancels contract, demands $1.3B refund Contractors sue to rescind cancelation,
saying it’s the Government’s fault U.S. invokes state-secrets doctrine to withhold
evidence of (alleged) Govt. mismanagement Q: Should contractors have negotiated
specific contract provisions for state secrets?
Link: SCOTUSBlog
In the news: Jose Cuervo settles “crow” trademark lawsuit by Jim Beam
JC breaches settle-ment agreement; JB sues
JC says, it’s not a material breach
Court: Tough - damages anywayLink: Opinion Blog
Passive voice exercise
Instructions: Download the Word documentDo #1, 2 (others will come later)
After the exercise, I will provide a link to the article from which these examples were taken.
Passive voice exercise
1. There is a considerable range of expertise demonstrated by the spam senders.
Passive voice exercise
2. It was determined by the committee that the report was inconclusive.
Letters of intent
Letter of intent overview
Purpose – use them? Or not?
Is there a more-accurate name?
Binding or nonbinding? What parts?
EXERCISE: Brainstorm points to consider covering, then draft key language
REVIEW actual sample (DCT to show)
Defined term: Business discretion
“IF: This Agreement commits a decision, determination, or action to a person's business discretion; THEN: That decision, determination, or action may be taken in the person's sole and unfettered discretion, with a mind solely to the person's own wishes and not those of any other person, and without reference to any putative standard of reasonableness, good faith, or fair dealing.”
Confidentiality agreements
Ubiquitous Dangerous – Celeritas v. Rockwell
Celeritas v. Rockwell
NDA had a marking requirement, but jury didn’t seem to care
Video deposition excerpts were deadly
Trial counsel got fired afterwards
Appeals court reversed and rendered the patent verdict, but upheld the trade secret verdict - $57 million
Celeritas v. Rockwell
“Significantly, Rockwell did not independently
develop its own de-emphasis technology, but
instead assigned the same engineers who
had learned of Celeritas's technology under
the NDA to work on the de-emphasis
development project.”