Contingent Theories of Leadership
-
Upload
pawanshrestha1 -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Contingent Theories of Leadership
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
1/22
Leadership Theories
Contingency Theories
Fiedler Model (by Fred Fiedler)
Leader-member relations
the degree of confidence, trust, and respectemployees had for their leader.
Task structure
the degree to which job assignments wereformalized and procedurized.
Position power the degree of influence a leader had over power-
based activities such as hiring, firing, discipline,promotions, and salary increases.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
2/22
Conclusion
task-oriented leaders performed better in very favorablesituations and in very unfavorable situations.
relationship-oriented leaders performed better inmoderately favorable situations.
Only two ways to improve leader effectiveness First, you could bring in a new leader whose style better fit
the situation. (replacement of relationship-oriented leaderby task-oriented leader)
Second, change the situation to fit the leader. (relationship-oriented into task-oriented by restructuring tasks orincreasing or decreasing the power that the leader hadover factors such as salary increases, promotion, anddisciplinary actions)
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
3/22
Situational Leadership Theory (by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard)
Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) focuses on followersreadiness.
The emphasis on the followers in leadership effectivenessreflects the reality that it isthe followers who accept or
reject the leader.
Regardless of what the leader does, effectivenessdepends on the actions of his or her followers.
This is an important dimension that has been overlookedor underemphasized in most leadership theories.
Readiness refers to the extent to which people have theability and willingness to accomplish a specific task.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
4/22
SLT uses the same two leadership dimensions thatFiedler identified: task and relationship behaviours.
A step further by considering each as either high orlow and then combining them into four specificleadership styles:
Telling(high task-low relationship): The leader defines
roles and tells people what, how, when, and where to dovarious tasks.
Selling(high task-high relationship): The leader providesboth directive and supportive behaviour.
Participating(low task-high relationship): The leader andfollower share in decision making; the main role of theleader is facilitating and communicating.
Delegating(low task-low relationship): The leader provideslittle direction or support.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
5/22
The SLT says if followers are unableand unwillingto do a task, the
leader needs to give clear and specific directions;
if followers are unableand willing, the leader needs todisplay high task orientation to compensate for thefollowers lack of ability and high relationship orientation
to get followers to buy into the leaders desires;
if followers are ableand unwilling, the leader needs touse a supportive and participative style; and
if employees are both ableand willing, the leaderdoesnt need to do much.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
6/22
Leader Participation Model (by Victor Vroom and Phillip Yetton)
Relates leadership behaviour and participation in decisionmaking.
Leader behaviour must adjust to reflect the task structure
whether it was routine, non-routine, or in between.
The model has changed as research continues to provideadditional insights into effective leadership style.
A current model reflects howand with whomdecisions are made and
uses variations of the same five leadership styles identified in the originalmodel.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
7/22
Leadership Styles in the Vroom Leader Participation Model (original)
Decide:Leader makes the decision alone and eitherannounces or sells it to group.
Consult Individually:Leader presents the problem togroup members individually, gets their suggestions, and
then makes the decision. Consult Group:Leader presents the problem to group
members in a meeting, gets their suggestions, and themmakes the decision.
Facilitate:Leader presents the problem to the group in ameeting and, acting as facilitator, defines the problem andthe boundaries within a decision must be made.
Delegate:Leader permits the group to make the decisionwithin prescribed limits.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
8/22
It also expands upon the decision-makingcontingencies leaders look at in determining whatleadership style would be most effective.
These contingencies - decision significance,importance of commitment, leader expertise,likelihood of commitment, group support, groupexpertise, and team competence are either
present or absent.
The current leader participation model
the Time-Driven Model, is short-term in its orientation and
concerned with making effective decisions with minimumcost.
the Development-Driven Model emphasizes makingeffective decisions with maximum employee developmentoutcomes and places no value on time.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
9/22
Path-Goal Model (by Robert House)
One of the most respected approaches tounderstanding leadership.
The path-goal theory states that its the leadersjob to assist his or her followers in attaining theirgoals and to provide the direction or supportneeded to ensure that their goals are compatiblewith the overall objectives of the group ororganization.
The term path-goalis derived from the belief thateffective leaders clarify the path to help theirfollowers get from where they are to theachievement of their work goals and make the
journey along the path easier by reducingroadbacks and pitfalls.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
10/22
House identified four leadership behaviours: Directive leader:Lets subordinates know whats expected
of them, schedules work to be done, and gives specificguidance on how to accomplish tasks.
Supportive leader:Is friendly and shows concern for theneeds of followers.
Participative leader:Consults with group members anduses their suggestions before making a decision.
Achievement-oriented leader:Sets challenging goals andexpects followers to perform at their highest level.
Path-goal theory assumes that the same leader can
display any or all of these leadership styles
depending on the situation.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
11/22
Leader Behaviour
DirectiveSupportiveParticipative
Achievement Oriented
Subordinate ContingencyFactors
Locus of ControlExperience
Perceived Ability
Outcomes
Performance Satisfaction
Environment ContingencyFactors
Task StructureFormal Authority SystemWork Group
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
12/22
Some predictions from path-goal theory are:
Directive leadership leads to greater satisfaction
when tasks are ambiguous or stressful than whenthey are highly structured and well laid out.
Supportive leadership results in high employeeperformance and satisfaction when subordinatesare performing structured tasks.
Directive leadership is likely to be perceived asredundant among subordinates with high perceived
ability or with considerable experience. The clearer and more bureaucratic the formal
authority relationships, the more leaders shouldexhibit supportive behaviour and deemphasize
directive behaviour.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
13/22
Directive leadership will lead to higher employee
satisfaction when there is substantive conflictwithin a work group.
Subordinates with an internal locus of control willbe more satisfied with a participative style.
Subordinates with an external locus of control willbe more satisfied with directive style. Achievement-oriented leadership will increase
subordinates expectancies that effort will lead tohigh performance when tasks are ambiguouslystructured.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
14/22
Cutting-Edge Approaches to Leadership
Latest views of leadership in organizationsThree contemporary approaches to leadership
1. Transformational-Transactional Leadership
Transactional leaders Leaders who guide ormotivate their followers in the direction ofestablished goals by clarifying role and taskrequirement.
Transformational leaders Leaders who provideindividualized consideration and intellectual
stimulation, and who possess charisma.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
15/22
2. Charismatic-Visionary Leadership
Charismatic leader An enthusiastic, self-confidentleader whose personality and actions influencepeople to behave in certain ways.
The most comprehensive analysis identifiedfive personal characteristics of a charismaticleader that differentiate charismatic leadersform non-charismatic ones:
They have vision
They are able to articulate that vision
They are willing to take risks to achieve that vision
They are sensitive to both environmental constraintsand followers needs, and
They exhibit behaviours that are out of the ordinary.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
16/22
2. Charismatic-Visionary Leadership
Visionary leadership The ability to create andarticulate a realistic, credible, and attractivevision of the future that improves upon thepresent situation.
Visionis often linked with charismatic leadership.
A vision should offer clear and compellingimagery that taps into peoples emotions and
inspires enthusiasm to pursue the organizations
goals.
It should be able to generate possibilities that areinspirational and unique and offer new ways ofdoing things that are clearly better for the
organization and its members.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
17/22
Visions that are clearly articulated and havepowerful imagery are easily grasped andaccepted.
Once vision is identified, these leaders appear tohave three qualities that are related to effectives
in their visionary roles: First is the ability to explain the vision to othersby
making the vision clear in terms of required goals andactions through clear oral and written communication.
The second skill is the ability to express the vision notjust verbally but through behaviour, which requiresbehaving in ways that continually covey and reinforcethe vision.
The third skill visionary leaders need is the ability toextend or apply the vision to different leadershipcontexts.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
18/22
3. Team LeadershipThe challenge for many managers is learninghow to become an effective team leader.
They have to learn skills such as having the patience to share information, being able to trust others and to give up
authority, and understanding when to intervene.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
19/22
A more meaningful way to describe the team leadersjob is to focus on two priorities:
(1) managing the teams external boundary and
(2) facilitating the team process.
These priorities entail four specific leadership roles:
Coach
Team Leader RolesConflict Manager Troubleshooter
Liaison withExternal
Constituencies
Team Leader
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
20/22
Issues Governing Leadership
Organizations need effective leaders.Two issues pertinent to becoming an effective
leader are leader training and recognizing thatsometimes being an effective leader means
notleading.
Leader Training Some people dont have what it takes to be a
leader. For instance, evidence indicates that leadership
training is more likely to be successful withindividuals who are high self-monitors than with lowself-monitors.
Such individuals have the flexibility to change theirbehaviour as different situations may require.
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
21/22
Organizations may find that individuals with higher
levels of a trait called motivation to lead are morereceptive to leadership development opportunities. It may be a bit optimistic to think that vision-creation
can be taught, but implementation skills can betaught.
People can be trained to develop an understandingabout content themes critical to effective visions.
Skills for trust building and mentoring can also betaught.
Leaders can be taught situational analysis skills.They can learn how to evaluate situations, how to modify situations to make them fit better with their
style, and
how to assess which leader behaviours might be mosteffective in given situations.
Sometimes Leadership is Irrelevant
-
8/3/2019 Contingent Theories of Leadership
22/22
Sometimes Leadership is Irrelevant Leadership may not always be important! Certain individual, job, and organizational variables
can act as substitutes for leadership, negating theinfluence of the leaders.
For instance, follower characteristics such asexperience, training, professional orientation, orneed for independence can neutralize the effect of
leadership. These characteristics can replace the employees
need for a leaders support or ability to createstructure and reduce task ambiguity.