CONTENTS

6.1 Introduction ........................................................................609

6.1.1 Hazard and risk .........................................................609

6.2 Risk assessment ...............................................................609

6.2.1 Approach .....................................................................609

6.2.2 Risk register ................................................................609

6.2.3 Change in risk profile ..............................................610

6.2.4 Health and safety ......................................................610

6.2.5 Wildlife Hazard Management Plan and Aerodrome Operations Manual ..........................610

6.2.6 Emergency Management Plan ............................610

6.2.7 Counter-terrorism and critical infrastructure protection .........................................610

6.2.8 Aeordrome Rescue and Fire Fighting Service ................................................610

TABLES

6.2a: Risk assessment matrix ..................................................................610

6.2b: Risk identification ...............................................................................611

E6-608 SUNSHINE COAST AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECT

E6 Impact SummaRy & management FRamewoRk

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

6.1 INTrOduCTION

6.1.1 Hazard and risk

this section provides a high level assessment of the hazards and risks to people and airport operations that may be associated with the Sunshine coast airport (Sca) expansion project (the project).

this risk assessment would provide the basis for future risk management as the project progresses.

the focus of future risk management will transition through design, construction and into operations. the form of the risk processes will be dependent on the procurement approach adopted but will be necessary to address safety in design risks, construction risks and operational risks, which will be addressed through the processes discussed in Sections 6.2 to 6.8.

6.2 rISk ASSESSmENT

6.2.1 Approacha risk assessment was completed for all aspects of the project delivery and operations based on the principles set out in Australia/New Zealand AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009 Risk management—Principles and Guidelines.

all phases of the project were considered, including:

a) preconstruction

b) civil works

c) Dredging

d) Runway and taxiway pavements

e) operations.

the risk assessment considers the combined likelihood and consequence of a potential event on personal safety and airport operations. an example of a major impact on airport operations would be a breach of airside security.

the risk assessment considered only risks that are considered to be project-specific. general site safety risks, for example, construction worker exposure to loud noise or sun, were not considered. It is expected these would be addressed in the contractor’s health and safety management plan.

the risk was determined based on the consequence and likelihood, as shown in Table 6.2a.

mitigation measures were determined for each risk, and the risk was re-assessed to determine the residual risk rating. all risks retained a residual medium or lower risk rating.

6.2.2 risk register

the risks identified for each project phase are provided in Table 6.2b. Risks have been identified as safety risks (S) or airport operations risks (ao) in the risk type column.

6.2.3 Change in risk profile

the development of the new runway would reduce the operational risk for the airport, owing to the following:

y the new runway is fully compliant with moS 139 for code 4e aircraft, including compliance for:

− Runway length and width

− Runway graded strip and flyover area

− Recommended 240 m runway and safety area.

− there are considerably fewer residences in the public Safety area of the new runway compared with Rwy 18/36

− the alignment of the new runway significantly reduces the occurrence of cross-winds compared with Rwy 18/36.

the likelihood of an aircraft crash on Rwy 13/31 is considered to be highly unlikely. as with any aircraft incident, the potential consequences of a crash would include multiple fatalities. nevertheless, given the very low likelihood of an incident (<1:10,000 chance of a fatality outside the public Safety area) the overall risk level is low.

Table 6.2a: Risk assessment matrix

Consequence

Safety No Injury Injury Fatality

Airport Operations minor moderate major

Likelihood

almost Impossible negligible (n) negligible (n) Low (L)

unlikely negligible (n) Low (L) medium (m)

possible Low (L) medium (m) High (H)

Likely medium (m) High (H) extreme (e)

E6-609environmental impact statement

6.2.4 Health and safety

Sca operates under a civil aviation Safety authority (caSa) approved Safety management System.

6.2.5 Wildlife Hazard management Plan and Aerodrome Operations manual

Sca operates in accordance with a wildlife Hazard management plan and aerodrome operations manual. these documents provide the framework to manage and mitigate operational risks at the airport.

Both of these documents will be redrafted prior to the commissioning of Runway (Rwy) 13/31 as part of the formal process for implementing the changes to airspace and aircraft management. the formal airspace change process is required to obtain certification to operate the new runway and will provide opportunity for commonwealth and State agencies to contribute to the agreed plans.

6.2.6 Emergency management Plan

Sca maintains an internal airport emergency plan.

the aim of the airport emergency plan is to provide a timely and coordinated response to, and recovery from, an emergency at the airport. It covers all manner of potential aviation related emergencies.

the plan details the arrangements for control and co-ordination of the response to, and initial recovery from, an emergency within the airport boundary or in the vicinity of Sunshine coast.

the airport emergency plan was developed to reflect the requirements of:

y civil aviation Safety Regulation part 139 and Icao annex 14 to the convention on International civil aviation

y Disaster Management Act 2003

y Sunshine coast council emergency operation plan

y Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS) Act 1991

y QaS multi casualty management plan.

this document is supported by a number of Standard operating procedures (Sops).

Sca would revise the existing airport emergency plan to include operations on the new runway before it is commissioned.

Sca also maintains the following:

y a cyclone plan to address severe weather at Sca and weather events farther afield that might impact on ops at Sca

y a pandemic Influenza management plan

all of these documents have been produced in concert with the relevant local, state and commonwealth agencies, including airservices, Queensland police Service, Queensland Fire and emergency Service (QFeS), Queensland ambulance Service, State emergency Service and the Local Disaster management group (LDmg). the LDmg is responsible for preparing and implementing council’s Local Disaster management plan.

6.2.7 Counter-terrorism and critical infrastructure protection

the Aviation Transport Security Act 2004 (cth) (atSa) establishes a regulatory framework to safeguard against acts of unlawful interference with aviation, in respect of australian registered aircraft in australian airspace and airports.

Sca, as the airport operator, is responsible for security at the airport and is obliged to have a transport Security program (tSp) under the atSa. the Sca transport Security program is confidential and only available to the airport and the commonwealth government.

6.2.8 Aviation rescue and Fire Fighting Service

the airport has a fully equipped aviation Rescue and Fire Fighting Service (aRFFS) facility to address all aviation related fire and rescue events. aRFFS are regulated under the civil aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (caSR 1998) part 139H, which specifies the requirements for the provision of aviation rescue and fire fighting services.

airservices australia (airservices) currently provide category 6 aRFFS for Sca. airservices is responsible for the provision of personnel, training and facilities to support aRFFS.

the project includes development of a site south of Rwy 13/31 for establishment of a joint air traffic control tower and new aRFFS station, which would be built by airservices. airservices would continue to provide aRFFS after commissioning the new runway in accordance with caSR 1998 part 139H.

with respect to fires located on adjoining lands, aRFFS may, at the request of QFeS, assist in off-site events provided that such assistance does not compromise their capacity to manage aviation incidents.

E6-610

Impact Summary & management Framework

RISK MANAGEMENT PLANE6

SunSHIne coaSt aIrport eXpanSIon proJect

Tabl

e 6.

2b: R

isk

iden

tifica

tion

Aspect

Impact

risk Type

Likelihood

Consequence

risk

mitigation

Likelihood

Consequence

residual risk

Pre

cons

truc

tion

No

proj

ect

spec

ific

risk

s id

entifi

ed

civ

il w

orks

upg

rade

to F

inla

nd

Roa

d –

inst

alla

tion

of tr

affic

ligh

ts a

t D

avid

Low

way

in

ters

ectio

n

wor

ks a

t an

activ

e in

ters

ectio

n co

uld

lead

to a

traf

fic a

ccid

ent

Sp

ossi

ble

Fata

lity

HIm

plem

ent t

raffi

c co

ntro

ls

and

man

agem

ent p

lan

durin

g co

nstr

uctio

n.

unl

ikel

yFa

talit

ym

clo

sure

of

Rw

y 1

2/30

airc

raft

may

land

on

the

clos

ed r

unw

ay.

ao

pos

sibl

em

ajor

HIm

plem

ent c

losu

re in

ac

cord

ance

with

ca

Sa

re

quire

men

ts.

unl

ikel

ym

ajor

m

airs

ide

fenc

e re

alig

nmen

tB

reac

hes

in th

e ai

rsid

e fe

nce

may

lead

to

a b

reac

h of

sec

urity

.a

op

ossi

ble

maj

orH

pre

scrib

e co

nstr

uctio

n se

quen

cing

and

sec

urity

re

quire

men

ts d

urin

g pe

rimet

er

fenc

e m

odifi

catio

ns

unl

ikel

ym

ajor

m

wor

k on

the

airs

ide

fenc

e re

alig

nmen

t cl

ose

to R

wy

18/

36 m

ay e

xten

d up

to 5

m

into

the

oLS

.

ao

pos

sibl

em

oder

ate

mIs

sue

not

ice

to a

irmen

(no

tam

) an

d/or

sch

edul

e w

orks

to a

void

ai

rcra

ft m

ovem

ents

.

pos

sibl

em

inor

L

upg

rade

/co

nstr

uctio

n of

si

te r

oads

Roa

d w

orks

in a

irsid

e ar

eas

may

im

ping

e on

the

oLS

or

intr

oduc

e fo

reig

n ob

ject

dam

age

(Fo

D) t

o R

wy

18/

36.

ao

pos

sibl

em

ajor

HLi

mit

the

heig

ht o

f equ

ipm

ent

used

for

airs

ide

road

wor

k an

d/or

sch

edul

e w

orks

to a

void

ai

rcra

ft m

ovem

ent.

Impl

emen

t du

st c

ontr

ol a

nd c

lean

up

pro

cedu

res.

unl

ikel

ym

ajor

m

Site

cle

arin

gR

emov

al o

f veg

etat

ion

may

incr

ease

w

ildlif

e ac

tivity

thro

ugh

disp

ersa

l of

dist

urbe

d w

ildlif

e an

d po

tent

ially

attr

act

rapt

ors,

whi

ch c

ould

lead

to b

ird s

trik

es.

ao

Like

lym

oder

ate

HS

tage

cle

arin

g to

min

imis

e fa

una

mov

emen

t int

o op

en a

reas

(i.e

. cl

ear

tow

ards

the

rem

aini

ng

vege

tatio

n). I

mpl

emen

t bird

su

rvei

llanc

e an

d di

sper

sal

tech

niqu

es to

dis

cour

age

bird

s ne

ar th

e ex

istin

g ru

nway

.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

E6-611environmental impact statement

Aspect

Impact

risk Type

Likelihood

Consequence

risk

mitigation

Likelihood

Consequence

residual riskP

reco

nstr

uctio

nN

o pr

ojec

t sp

ecifi

c ri

sks

iden

tified

eart

hwor

ksea

rthw

orks

for

site

infra

stru

ctur

e (s

uch

as in

tern

al h

aul r

oads

) cou

ld g

ener

ate

dust

, whi

ch c

ould

pre

sent

a h

azar

d to

ai

rcra

ft m

ovem

ents

.

ao

Like

lym

oder

ate

HIm

plem

ent a

dus

t man

agem

ent

plan

, with

str

inge

nt r

equi

rem

ents

w

ithin

300

m o

f Rw

y 1

8/36

.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

con

stru

ctio

n of

nor

ther

n pe

rimet

er d

rain

the

pres

ence

of s

tand

ing

wat

er in

the

part

ially

con

stru

cted

dra

in c

ould

attr

act

bird

s, w

hich

cou

ld le

ad to

bird

str

ikes

.

ao

Like

lym

oder

ate

HIm

plem

ent b

ird s

urve

illan

ce

and

disp

ersa

l tec

hniq

ues

to

disc

oura

ge b

irds.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

the

use

of la

rge

eart

hmov

ing

mac

hine

ry a

ppro

x. 5

0 m

from

the

VHF-

omni

dire

ctio

nal r

adar

(Vo

R) w

ould

af

fect

its

perf

orm

ance

.

ao

Like

lym

ajor

eth

e Vo

R w

ould

nee

d to

be

relo

cate

d be

fore

con

stru

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es o

ccur

nea

r th

e so

uth-

east

end

of t

he c

onst

ruct

ion

area

.

alm

ost

Impo

ssib

lem

ajor

L

con

stru

ctio

n of

per

imet

er

recl

amat

ion

bund

an

d po

lishi

ng

pond

wal

l

the

pres

ence

of s

ite r

unof

f with

in th

e bu

nd c

ould

attr

act b

irds,

whi

ch c

ould

le

ad to

bird

str

ikes

.. th

e po

lishi

ng p

ond

wou

ld b

e lo

cate

d ap

prox

. 2 k

m fr

om

Ry

w 1

8/36

.

ao

pos

sibl

em

oder

ate

mIm

plem

ent b

ird s

urve

illan

ce

and

disp

ersa

l tec

hniq

ues

to

disc

oura

ge b

irds.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

Dre

dge

pipe

line

inst

alla

tion

pub

lic s

afet

y at

the

cons

truc

tion

site

on

mar

cool

a be

ach

durin

g pi

pelin

e as

sem

bly.

Sp

ossi

ble

Fata

lity

Hth

e be

ach

wou

ld b

e te

mpo

raril

y cl

osed

dur

ing

asse

mbl

y of

th

e sa

nd p

ipel

ine.

. pro

visi

on

for

alte

rnat

ive

publ

ic a

nd

emer

genc

y ve

hicl

e ac

cess

wou

ld

be p

rovi

ded

arou

nd th

e ac

tive

cons

truc

tion

site

.

unl

ikel

yIn

jury

L

pub

lic s

afet

y w

hen

the

pipe

line

is b

eing

dr

agge

d fro

m th

e be

ach

to th

e m

oorin

g po

int.

Sp

ossi

ble

Fata

lity

Hth

e pu

blic

wou

ld b

e as

ked

to

stay

cle

ar o

f the

ope

ratio

nal a

rea

durin

g th

e w

orks

. not

e: t

he

Reg

iona

l Har

bour

mas

ter

may

re

quire

a te

mpo

rary

exc

lusi

on

zone

bet

wee

n th

e be

ach

and

the

off-

shor

e pu

mp

out l

ocat

ion.

unl

ikel

yFa

talit

ym

E6-612

Impact Summary & management Framework

RISK MANAGEMENT PLANE6

SunSHIne coaSt aIrport eXpanSIon proJect

Aspect

Impact

risk Type

Likelihood

Consequence

risk

mitigation

Likelihood

Consequence

residual riskP

reco

nstr

uctio

nN

o pr

ojec

t sp

ecifi

c ri

sks

iden

tified

Dre

dge

pipe

line

inst

alla

tion

pub

lic s

afet

y w

hen

the

pipe

line

is b

eing

dr

agge

d fro

m th

e be

ach

to th

e pu

mp-

out s

ite.

Sp

ossi

ble

Fata

lity

Hth

e pu

blic

wou

ld b

e as

ked

to

stay

cle

ar o

f the

ope

ratio

nal a

rea

durin

g th

e w

orks

. not

e: t

he

Reg

iona

l Har

bour

mas

ter

may

re

quire

a te

mpo

rary

exc

lusi

on

zone

bet

wee

n th

e be

ach

and

the

off-

shor

e pu

mp

out l

ocat

ion.

unl

ikel

yFa

talit

ym

a m

embe

r of

the

publ

ic c

ould

fall

whi

le

tryi

ng tr

y to

cro

ss th

e sa

nd p

ipel

ine.

SLi

kely

Inju

ryH

ped

estr

ian

acce

ss w

ould

be

prov

ided

ove

r th

e sa

nd p

ipel

ine

abov

e th

e hi

gh-t

ide

mar

k on

ce it

is in

stal

led.

the

acc

ess

wou

ld b

e de

sign

ed to

ens

ure

safe

and

uni

vers

al a

cces

s. a

ve

hicl

e cr

ossi

ng p

oint

wou

ld b

e pr

ovid

ed fo

r em

erge

ncy

vehi

cles

.

unl

ikel

yIn

jury

L

eart

hwor

ks fo

r si

te in

frast

ruct

ure

(suc

h as

inte

rnal

hau

l roa

ds) c

ould

gen

erat

e du

st, w

hich

cou

ld p

rese

nt a

haz

ard

to

airc

raft

mov

emen

ts.

ao

Like

lym

oder

ate

HIm

plem

ent a

dus

t man

agem

ent

plan

, with

str

inge

nt r

equi

rem

ents

w

ithin

300

m o

f Rw

y 1

8/36

.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

pip

elin

e in

stal

latio

n eq

uipm

ent t

alle

r th

an 4

.5 m

cou

ld im

ping

e on

the

oLS

of

Rw

y 1

8/36

.

ao

Like

lym

ajor

eIf

equi

pmen

t gre

ater

than

4.5

m

in h

eigh

t is

used

to in

stal

l the

sa

nd p

ipel

ine,

thes

e w

orks

wou

ld

be s

ched

uled

in c

onsu

ltatio

n w

ith a

ir tr

affic

con

trol

(atc

) to

occu

r du

ring

non-

flyin

g ho

urs.

th

e co

ntra

ctor

wou

ld b

e in

co

nsta

nt c

omm

unic

atio

n w

ith

atc

so

that

wor

ks c

ould

be

halte

d an

d th

e ar

ea c

lear

ed if

an

unpl

anne

d fli

ght w

ere

to o

ccur

.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

m

E6-613environmental impact statement

Aspect

Impact

risk Type

Likelihood

Consequence

risk

mitigation

Likelihood

Consequence

residual riskP

reco

nstr

uctio

nN

o pr

ojec

t sp

ecifi

c ri

sks

iden

tified

Dre

dge

pipe

line

inst

alla

tion

the

pipe

line

coul

d in

hibi

t acc

ess

by

avi

atio

n R

escu

e an

d Fi

refig

htin

g S

ervi

ce

(aR

FFS

) veh

icle

s to

the

site

of a

n in

cide

nt a

t the

airp

ort.

ao

pos

sibl

em

ajor

Ha

n ac

cess

ram

p ov

er th

e pi

pelin

e w

ould

be

prov

ided

to

ensu

re a

cces

s to

all

area

s of

the

airp

ort..

the

pip

elin

e in

stal

latio

n w

ould

be

stag

ed to

ens

ure

that

acc

ess

over

the

pipe

line

is

avai

labl

e at

all

times

.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

the

pipe

line

coul

d in

hibi

t acc

ess

by a

RFF

S v

ehic

les

to th

e si

te o

f an

inci

dent

at t

he a

irpor

t.

ao

pos

sibl

em

ajor

Ha

n ac

cess

ram

p ov

er th

e pi

pelin

e w

ould

be

prov

ided

to

ensu

re a

cces

s to

all

area

s of

the

airp

ort..

the

pip

elin

e in

stal

latio

n w

ould

be

stag

ed to

ens

ure

that

acc

ess

over

the

pipe

line

is

avai

labl

e at

all

times

.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

San

d pu

mpi

nga

pip

e bu

rst c

ould

occ

ur o

n m

arco

ola

beac

h.S

unl

ikel

yIn

jury

Lth

e co

nditi

on o

f the

san

d pi

pelin

e w

ould

be

mon

itore

d an

d im

med

iate

act

ion

wou

ld b

e ta

ken

in th

e ev

ent o

f a s

igni

fican

t le

ak.

unl

ikel

yn

o in

jury

n

a p

ipe

burs

t cou

ld o

ccur

in a

n ai

rsid

e ar

ea.

ao

unl

ikel

ym

ajor

Hth

e co

nditi

on o

f the

san

d pi

pelin

e w

ould

be

mon

itore

d an

d im

med

iate

act

ion

wou

ld b

e ta

ken

in th

e ev

ent o

f a s

igni

fican

t le

ak.

unl

ikel

ym

inor

n

pot

entia

l int

erac

tion

betw

een

the

dred

ger

and/

or tu

g, a

nd r

ecre

atio

nal o

r fis

hing

ves

sels

.

Sp

ossi

ble

Fata

lity

Hth

e pu

mp-

out a

rea

wou

ld

be m

arke

d-ou

t with

buo

ys

and

advi

sory

sig

ns w

ould

be

inst

alle

d. n

ote:

the

Reg

iona

l H

arbo

ur m

aste

r m

ay r

equi

re a

te

mpo

rary

exc

lusi

on z

one

for

the

dura

tion

of th

e pu

mpi

ng

activ

ities

.

unl

ikel

yIn

jury

L

E6-614

Impact Summary & management Framework

RISK MANAGEMENT PLANE6

SunSHIne coaSt aIrport eXpanSIon proJect

Aspect

Impact

risk Type

Likelihood

Consequence

risk

mitigation

Likelihood

Consequence

residual riskP

reco

nstr

uctio

nN

o pr

ojec

t sp

ecifi

c ri

sks

iden

tified

tailw

ater

m

anag

emen

tta

ilwat

er in

the

polis

hing

pon

d an

d w

ater

bei

ng p

umpe

d to

site

cou

ld

attr

act b

irds,

whi

ch c

ould

lead

to

bird

str

ikes

.

ao

pos

sibl

em

oder

ate

mIm

plem

ent b

ird s

urve

illan

ce

and

disp

ersa

l tec

hniq

ues

to

disc

oura

ge b

irds.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

the

polis

hing

pon

d w

all c

ould

fail,

re

leas

ing

tailw

ater

. pot

entia

l dam

age

from

a fa

ilure

wou

ld b

e lim

ited

to o

n-si

te c

onst

ruct

ion-

phas

e in

frast

ruct

ure

(suc

h as

the

perim

eter

roa

d).

Su

nlik

ely

Fata

lity

mD

esig

n th

e po

nd w

all w

ith a

n ap

prop

riate

fact

or o

f saf

ety.

R

egul

ar in

spec

tion

of b

und

wal

l int

egrit

y.

alm

ost

Impo

ssib

leFa

talit

yL

tailw

ater

m

anag

emen

tth

e pr

esen

ce o

f app

rox.

1.5

m d

eep

of w

ater

in th

e po

lishi

ng p

ond

coul

d pr

esen

t a s

afet

y ha

zard

. the

pol

ishi

ng

pond

wou

ld b

e se

cure

d to

pre

vent

pu

blic

acc

ess

to th

e ar

ea.

Su

nlik

ely

Fata

lity

mth

e po

nd w

all w

ould

be

desi

gned

with

a w

ide

enou

gh

cres

t to

allo

w s

afe

acce

ss

arou

nd th

e po

nd.

unl

ikel

yFa

talit

ym

pav

emen

t c

onst

ruct

ion

San

d tr

imm

ing

eart

hwor

ks d

urin

g sa

nd tr

imm

ing

coul

d ge

nera

te d

ust,

whi

ch c

ould

pre

sent

a

haza

rd to

airc

raft

mov

emen

ts.

ao

Like

lym

oder

ate

HIm

plem

ent a

dus

t man

agem

ent

plan

, with

str

inge

nt r

equi

rem

ents

w

ithin

300

m o

f Rw

y 1

8/36

.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

pav

emen

t co

nstr

uctio

nD

eliv

ery

of p

avem

ent m

ater

ials

to s

ite

wou

ld in

crea

se th

e m

ovem

ent o

f lar

ge

vehi

cles

bet

wee

n th

e so

urce

qua

rry

and

the

site

, whi

ch c

ould

intr

oduc

e tr

affic

ha

zard

s.

Sp

ossi

ble

Fata

lity

HIm

plem

ent a

traf

fic m

anag

emen

t pl

an, w

hich

wou

ld c

onsi

der

haul

rou

tes

and

appr

oved

trav

el

times

.

unl

ikel

yFa

talit

ym

Sto

ckpi

ling

and

prep

arin

g pa

vem

ent

mat

eria

ls c

ould

gen

erat

e du

st,

whi

ch c

ould

pre

sent

a h

azar

d to

airc

raft

mov

emen

ts.

ao

Like

lym

oder

ate

HLo

cate

the

pave

men

t sto

ckpi

ling

and

batc

hing

are

a aw

ay fr

om

Rw

y 1

8/36

. Im

plem

ent a

dus

t m

anag

emen

t pla

n, w

ith s

trin

gent

re

quire

men

ts w

ithin

300

m o

f R

wy

18/

36.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

E6-615environmental impact statement

Aspect

Impact

risk Type

Likelihood

Consequence

risk

mitigation

Likelihood

Consequence

residual riskP

reco

nstr

uctio

nN

o pr

ojec

t sp

ecifi

c ri

sks

iden

tified

pav

emen

t co

nstr

uctio

n w

ithin

Rw

y 1

8/36

ru

nway

str

ip

con

stru

ctio

n ac

tiviti

es w

ithin

the

runw

ay

strip

pre

sent

an

obst

acle

and

dus

t/Fo

D

haza

rd to

airc

raft.

ao

Like

lym

ajor

eIt

is p

lann

ed to

tem

pora

rily

oper

ate

Rw

y 1

3/31

with

a

disp

lace

d th

resh

old

so th

at

Rw

y 1

8/36

cou

ld b

e te

mpo

raril

y cl

osed

dur

ing

the

wor

ks. a

t thi

s tim

e, a

ll fli

ghts

wou

ld b

e fro

m/

to R

wy

13/

31. c

onst

ruct

ion

activ

ities

wou

ld b

e m

anag

ed

unde

r a

‘met

hod

of w

orki

ng

pla

n’, w

hich

will

be

prep

ared

in

conj

unct

ion

with

Sc

a a

irpor

t op

erat

ions

per

sonn

el a

nd

airs

ervi

ces

aus

tral

ia.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

apr

on e

xten

sion

an

d ta

xiw

ay

chan

ges

at th

e w

este

rn g

ener

al

avi

atio

n (g

a) a

rea

con

stru

ctio

n of

the

apro

n ex

pans

ion

and

chan

ges

to th

e R

wy

12/

30

taxi

way

s in

trod

uces

con

flict

s fo

r th

e ex

istin

g g

a fa

cilit

ies

wes

t of

the

term

inal

.

ao

Like

lym

oder

ate

Hth

e pr

ojec

t pha

sing

wou

ld

need

to c

onsi

der

prov

idin

g ac

cess

from

the

wes

tern

ga

ar

ea to

Rw

y 1

8/36

thro

ugho

ut

the

wor

ks. t

his

may

incl

ude

cons

truc

tion

of te

mpo

rary

ta

xiw

ays

arou

nd c

onst

ruct

ion

area

s or

sim

ilar

tem

pora

ry

wor

ks.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

E6-616

Impact Summary & management Framework

RISK MANAGEMENT PLANE6

SunSHIne coaSt aIrport eXpanSIon proJect

Aspect

Impact

risk Type

Likelihood

Consequence

risk

mitigation

Likelihood

Consequence

residual riskP

reco

nstr

uctio

nN

o pr

ojec

t sp

ecifi

c ri

sks

iden

tified

term

inal

upg

rade

pub

lic a

cces

s to

an

activ

e co

nstr

uctio

n si

te p

rese

nts

safe

ty h

azar

ds.

Sp

ossi

ble

Inju

rym

cor

don

off c

onst

ruct

ion

area

s an

d di

vert

the

publ

ic a

roun

d un

safe

are

as. e

rect

app

ropr

iate

w

arni

ng s

igns

.

unl

ikel

yIn

jury

L

wor

ks in

airs

ide

area

s co

uld

intr

oduc

e du

st a

nd F

oD

haz

ards

for

airc

raft.

ao

pos

sibl

em

oder

ate

mc

onst

ruct

ion

activ

ities

wou

ld

be m

anag

ed u

nder

a ‘m

etho

d of

wor

king

pla

n’, w

hich

will

be

pre

pare

d in

con

junc

tion

with

Sc

a a

irpor

t ope

ratio

ns

pers

onne

l and

airs

ervi

ces

aus

tral

ia.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

una

utho

rised

airs

ide

acce

ss p

rese

nts

a se

curit

y ha

zard

.a

op

ossi

ble

maj

orm

mai

ntai

n an

d im

plem

ent

airs

ide

secu

rity

mea

sure

s. o

nly

auth

oris

ed c

onst

ruct

ion

wor

kers

to

hav

e ai

rsid

e ac

cess

.

unl

ikel

ym

oder

ate

L

ope

ratio

ns

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

new

ope

ratin

g pr

oced

ures

Impr

oper

impl

emen

tatio

n of

flig

ht

proc

edur

es p

rese

nts

airc

raft

oper

atio

ns

haza

rds.

ao

pos

sibl

em

ajor

Hu

nder

take

com

mis

sion

ing

and

intr

oduc

tion

of n

ew p

roce

dure

s in

acc

orda

nce

with

est

ablis

hed

guid

elin

es a

nd in

liai

son

with

c

aS

a a

nd a

irser

vice

s a

ustr

alia

in

clud

ing

upda

te o

f man

agem

ent

plan

s to

obt

ain

runw

ay

cert

ifica

tion.

Issu

e ap

prop

riate

n

ota

m in

lead

-up

to r

unw

ay

open

ing.

unl

ikel

ym

ajor

m

E6-617environmental impact statement