Contents page questionnaire summary

In total 8 people answered my questionnaire, there are several things that the respondents both

liked and disliked. Throughout the questionnaire it was agreed that my contents page looked

conventional. The font received mixed views however the majority were positive comments such as,

the font is legible and easy to read. On the other hand a reoccurring point was that the Editors note

font, was too large and bold.

The colour scheme was praised in the way that, the red and white complemented each other, but

the use of colour was, at points criticised, or, more specifically the lack of colour used. Some

respondents found the persistent use of white plain. When asked about the layout many of those

who replied said it was pleasant to look at and easy to follow. Criticisms included the blank space at

the bottom of the page, it was said that it should be filled with another article.

The question that asked if the articles were appropriate for a music magazine was met with no

criticism. Question about whether the images were suitable also had positive answers; the only

negative point made was that there should be a few more images

In order to improve my magazine there are several things I need to do. Firstly I should modify the

Editors note font to a sleeker, smaller style. Along with this, I will also substitute the use of white

colour to make the contents page more appealing. The blank space will also be filled with text,

perhaps a subscription offer. Finally I will also aim to use more images. All of this will be done, in

order to improve my magazine front cover.