Consumption - 2 ECN 201 -Economic Data Analysis Lawlor.
-
Upload
reynold-page -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Consumption - 2 ECN 201 -Economic Data Analysis Lawlor.
Consumption - 2
ECN 201 -Economic Data Analysis
Lawlor
Review
• Linear form of consumption function:– C = a + b*Y
– where a is “autonomous spending”– b = MPC
– Fits Keynes’s “Fundamental Psychological Law”
– Fits the U. S. post-war data: Gretl• LR MPC = .96
– Fits the U. S. Great Depression• MPC = .76
Further Explore The MPC
APC = the Average Propensity to Consume– = C/Y = (a + by)/Y = a/y + b
• Define MPC and APC graphically
• Show how to simulate it on Excell
Explore meaning of “a”
• Statistically is the measure of our ignorance• Algebraically, Graphically a’s arithmetic sign
related to the rate of change of APC while income changes– If it is negative, a/Y<MPC, APC <MPC, and falls as
income rises– If it is positive, a/Y>MPC, APC>MPC, and rises as
income rises– If it is zero, a/Y = MPC, APC = MPC, and is constant
as income rises
Can Simulate this with Excel• Decide on the parameters “a” and “b”
• Fill in different values of Y to get different values of C
• Show on Excel
Does the l.r. Cons. Fn. Make Sense
• Remember in Keynes’s discussion of “units” he said aggregate variables were only comparable over the s. r.– Meant aggregate Y, C, P
• We may want to restrict our comparisons to “decade” long units at the most– We ask you to do some of this type of
modeling in Gretl in your assignment - show
Or, both in the s.r. and the l.r. may want to add more variables
• Keynes mentioned “windfall changes in capital values”
• Perhaps the way Americans, and American society, has altered the way that average people save, and so changed the average household balance sheet, has effected the MPS
• Discuss this, and the difference between “defined benefit” plans and “defined contribution plans”
What sorts of assets are important to Households
• Mutual Fund saving suggest that financial market instruments might be important– Could proxy this effect statistically with stocks
• See the St. Louis Fed database
• The Current period suggest some people are saving through speculation in housing
Note relation to cons. Fn.
• We are saying there is more than one variable responsible for a con. fn, and so a savings fn.– C = f(Y, stock values, house values, culture,
financial market innovation (sub-prime mortgages))
– Statistically, this increase in rhs variables means we are entering into the realm of “multiple variable regression”
One linear form of this
• C = a + b1Y + b2S&P500
• Note we are asking you to explore this possibility in the LR in your project
• Look at TRSP in Gretl, graph it as a time series, explain its dynamics
• Explore time series plot alone and with C, with APC• Show how to construct APC
• Class example might be to consider a recent s.r. period: – Note: first consider data availability, what we know of institutional
and economic history
• TRSP Limits us to 2003:12, so lets run a regression for the period 1983:12 – 1993:12– Captures the period of run up in stock values
• Show how in Gretl “range” and “model”
• Model the cons. fn. for this period with and without TRSP